22 results  1 of 2 

1 Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
Eun-Jeong Bae, Eun-Jin Woo
Anat Cell Biol.2022;55(1):72-78.   Published online 2022 March 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.136
      
2 3D analysis of soft tissue around implant after flap folding suture
Sae-Young Jung, Dae-Young Kang, Hyun-Seung Shin, Jung-Chul Park
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2021;37(3):130-137.   Published online 2021 September 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2021.37.3.130
      
3 Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: In vivo analysis of trueness and precision
Miran Kwon, Youngmok Cho, Dong-Wook Kim, MyungSu Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Minho Chang
Korean J Orthod.2021;51(2):95-104.   Published online 2021 March 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.95
      
4 Full mouth rehabilitation of a severely worn dentition using intraoral scanner and the CAD/CAM double scanning technique
Se-Na Yoon, Jung-Suk Han, In-Sung Yeo, Hyung-In Yoon
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2020;58(1):67-76.   Published online 2020 January 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.67
      
5 A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study
Mikel Iturrate, Erlantz Lizundia, Xabier Amezua, Eneko Solaberrieta
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(6):331-340.   Published online 2019 December 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.331
      
6 A review on the accuracy assessment methods of 3-dimensional digital dental models
Ji-Su Park, Young-Jun Lim, Jungwon Lee, Bongju Kim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2019;35(2):55-63.   Published online 2019 June 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.2.55
      
7 Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanner by three-dimensional analysis in single and 3-unit bridge abutment model: In vitro study
Mei-Yang Huang, Keunbada Son, Wan-Sun Lee, Kyu-Bok Lee
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2019;57(2):102-109.   Published online 2019 April 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.102
      
8 Questionnaire survey for the clinical trial participants who experienced both digital and conventional impression
Eunbee Yang, Bongju Kim, Jun Jae Lee, Seung-Pyo Lee, Young-Jun Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(4):270-279.   Published online 2018 December 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.270
      
9 Comparison of the accuracy of digital impressions and traditional impressions: Systematic review
Kyoung-Rok Kim, Kweonsoo Seo, Sunjai Kim
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2018;56(3):258-268.   Published online 2018 July 20     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.3.258
      
10 Clinical application of an intraoral scanner for serial evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement: A preliminary study
Dalsun Yun, Dong-Soon Choi, Insan Jang, Bong-Kuen Cha
Korean J Orthod.2018;48(4):262-267.   Published online 2018 July 6     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.262
      
11 Comparative study on quality of scanned images from varying materials and surface conditions of standardized model for dental scanner evaluation
Ju-Hee Park, Jeong-Hwan Seol, Jun Jae Lee, Seung-Pyo Lee, Young-Jun Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(2):104-115.   Published online 2018 June 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.2.104
      
12 구강스캐너 5종의 협측 악간관계 스캔 정확성 비교 연구
Ji-Man Park, Jin Jeon, Seong-Joo Heo
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(1):17-31.   Published online 2018 March 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.1.17
      
13 A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator
Hye-Nan Park, Young-Jun Lim, Won-Jin Yi, Jung-Suk Han, Seung-Pyo Lee
J Adv Prosthodont.2018;10(1):58-64.   Published online 2018 February 12     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.58
      
14 Immediate loading of mandibular single implant by using surgical guide and modeless digital prosthesis: a case report
Hyun-jeong Lim, Myung-Joo Kim, Ho-Beom Kwon, Young-Jun Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2017;33(4):299-306.   Published online 2017 December 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.4.299
      
15 Superimposition: a simple method to minimize occlusal adjustment of monolithic restoration
Changhun Choi, Sunjai Kim
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2016;54(3):253-258.   Published online 2016 December 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.253
   
16 Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form
Ji-Man Park
J Adv Prosthodont.2016;8(5):354-362.   Published online 2016 October 21     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.354
      
17 Creating a digitized database of maxillofacial prostheses (obturators): A pilot study
Mahmoud Elbashti, Mariko Hattori, Yuka Sumita, Amel Aswehlee, Shigen Yoshi, Hisashi Taniguchi
J Adv Prosthodont.2016;8(3):219-223.   Published online 2016 June 17     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.219
      
18 The user-friendly, ergonomic design aspect of recent intraoral scanners: a literature review
Hye-Nan Park, Won-Hee Kim, Young-Jun Lim, Won-Jin Lee, Jung-Suk Han, Seung-Pyo Lee
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2015;31(3):221-230.   Published online 2015 September 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2015.31.3.221
      
19 Clinical case of implant restoration using customized healing abutment
Jung-Wan Park, Min-Ho Hong, Kyu-Bok Lee
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2015;53(3):222-227.   Published online 2015 February 9     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.222
   
20 Digital intraoral impression for immediate provisional restoration of maxillary single implant: A case report
Yun-Jeong Chang, Hong-Jun Kim, Mi-Kyoung Song, Ji-Eun Moon, Hal-La Lee, Chan-Ik Park
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2015;53(3):234-243.   Published online 2015 February 9     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.234
   

 1 of 2