71 results  1 of 4 

1 Comparative accuracy of implant impression techniques with different splinting materials
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2023;39(1):9-20.   Published online 2023 March 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2023.39.1.9
      
2 Effectiveness of the novel impression tray “cleftray” for infants with cleft lip and palate: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Ritesh Kalaskar, Priyanka Bhaje, Shruti Balasubramanian, Ashita Kalaskar
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.2021;47(2):82-90.   Published online 2021 April 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.2.82
      
3 Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: In vivo analysis of trueness and precision
Miran Kwon, Youngmok Cho, Dong-Wook Kim, MyungSu Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Minho Chang
Korean J Orthod.2021;51(2):95-104.   Published online 2021 March 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.95
      
4 Three-dimensional printed complete denture fabrication using the scan data from the conventional denture-making process
Hyun-Min Kim, Jong-Jin Kim, Joo-Hee Lee, Hyun-Suk Cha, Jin Baik
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2020;36(3):196-202.   Published online 2020 September 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.3.196
      
5 임플란트 디지털 인상용 코핑의 정확성 비교
Gyo-Zin Ahn, Joon-Seok Lee
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2020;36(1):29-40.   Published online 2020 March 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.1.29
      
6 A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study
Mikel Iturrate, Erlantz Lizundia, Xabier Amezua, Eneko Solaberrieta
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(6):331-340.   Published online 2019 December 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.331
      
7 Evaluation of marginal adaptation in three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and powder-free digital impression techniques
Hasan Kocaağaoğlu, Haydar Albayrak, Sezgi Cinel Sahin, Ayşegül Güleryüz Gürbulak
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(5):262-270.   Published online 2019 October 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.262
      
8 Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study
Agne Gedrimiene, Rimas Adaskevicius, Vygandas Rutkunas
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(5):271-279.   Published online 2019 October 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.271
      
9 Complete denture making in a patient of partial glossectomy using polished surface impression taking and direct metal laser sintering method: A case report
Yeon-Wook Jung, Gyeong-Je Lee, Hee-Jung Kim
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2019;57(4):350-355.   Published online 2019 October 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.4.350
      
10 Functional impression technique using temporary denture for rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillary and mandibular ridges
Young-Kyo Suh, Jung-Yoon Bae, Hyun-Hee Kim
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2019;57(3):238-244.   Published online 2019 July 26     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.238
      
11 Comparison of different impression techniques for edentulous jaws using three-dimensional analysis
Sua Jung, Chan Park, Hong-So Yang, Hyun-Pil Lim, Kwi-Dug Yun, Zhai Ying, Sang-Won Park
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(3):179-186.   Published online 2019 June 26     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.3.179
      
12 Accuracy of casts produced from conventional and digital workflows: A qualitative and quantitative analyses
Jaafar Abduo
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(2):138-146.   Published online 2019 April 26     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.138
      
13 Implant-assisted removable partial denture for severely atrophied mandible
Bada Choi, Yeun Ju Kim, Jae Hoon Lee
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2019;57(2):171-175.   Published online 2019 April 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.171
      
14 Complete denture made with closed-mouth impression technique on severely atrophied edentulous jaw
Suk-Hwan Lee, Richard Leesungbok, Suk-Won Lee
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2019;57(2):195-202.   Published online 2019 April 25     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.195
      
15 The accuracy of Colposcopic impression among patients undergoing directed biopsy
Hye Sook Chon, Seon Kyung Lee, Seung Bo Kim
Korean J Gynecol Oncol Colposc.2002;13(2):116-123.   Published online 2019 March 12     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/kjgoc.2002.13.2.116
      
16 Questionnaire survey for the clinical trial participants who experienced both digital and conventional impression
Eunbee Yang, Bongju Kim, Jun Jae Lee, Seung-Pyo Lee, Young-Jun Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(4):270-279.   Published online 2018 December 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.270
      
17 Neutral zone approach and external impression for rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillary and mandibular ridges: a case report
Yujin Jo, Chang-woo Ko, Sang-Won Park, Kwi-Dug Yun, Chan Park, Hyun-Pil Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(4):324-330.   Published online 2018 December 31     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.324
      
18 Neutral zone approach and external impression for rehabilitation of macroglossia: a case report
Hyeon Kang, Nu-Ri Seo, Sang-Won Park, Kwi-Dug Yun, Chan Park, Hyun-Pil Lim
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(3):218-224.   Published online 2018 September 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.218
      
19 Rehabilitation of a patient with atrophic ridges using gothic arch tracing and nonpressure impression: a case report
Shin-Yeop Lee, Jung-Hyun Yu
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.2018;34(3):232-238.   Published online 2018 September 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.232
      
20 Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping
Shin-Eon Lee, Sung-Eun Yang, Cheol-Won Lee, Won-Sup Lee, Su Young Lee
J Adv Prosthodont.2018;10(4):265-270.   Published online 2018 August 17     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265
      

 1 of 4