5 results  1 of 1 

1 All-ceramic versus titanium-based implant supported restorations: Preliminary 12-months results from a randomized controlled trial
Paul Weigl, Georgia Trimpou, Eleftherios Grizas, Pablo Hess, Georg-Hubertus Nentwig, Hans-Christoph Lauer, Jonas Lorenz
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(1):48-54.   Published online 2019 February 26     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.48
      
2 Comparison of marginal and internal fit of zirconia abutments with titanium abutments in internal hexagonal implants
Young-Ho Kim, Hye-Won Cho
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2016;54(2):93-102.   Published online 2016 December 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.2.93
   
3 Evaluation of effect of galvanic corrosion between nickel-chromium metal and titanium on ion release and cell toxicity
Jung-Jin Lee, Kwang-Yeob Song, Seung-Geun Ahn, Jung-Yun Choi, Jae-Min Seo, Ju-Mi Park
J Adv Prosthodont.2015;7(2):172-177.   Published online 2015 April 23     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.172
      
4 A comparative study of gold UCLA-type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments
Ji-Man Park, Jai-Bong Lee, Seong-Joo Heo, Eun-Jin Park
J Adv Prosthodont.2014;6(1):46-52.   Published online 2014 February 14     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.46
      
5 Surface roughness changes caused by the galvanic corrosion between a titanium abutment and base metal alloy
Jung-Jin Lee, Kwang-Yeob Song, Seung-Keun Ahn, Ju-Mi Park
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2011;49(1):65-72.   Published online 2011 December 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.1.65
   

 1 of 1