5 results  1 of 1 

1 The impact of incontinence etiology on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes
Adam R. Miller, Brian J. Linder, Laureano J. Rangel, David Y. Yang, Daniel S. Elliott
Investig Clin Urol.2017;58(4):241-246.   Published online 2017 June 27     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.4.241
      
2 The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?
Craig V. Comiter, Amy D. Dobberfuhl
Investig Clin Urol.2016;57(1):3-13.   Published online 2016 January 11     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.1.3
      
3 Functional Outcomes and Long-term Durability of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Application: Review of 56 Patients With Long-term Follow-up
Ömer Gülpınar, Evren Süer, Mehmet İlker Gökce, Ahmet Hakan Haliloğlu, Erdem Öztürk, Nihat Arıkan
Korean J Urol.2013;54(6):373-376.   Published online 2013 June 12     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.6.373
      
4 Efficacy and Safety of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Stress Urinary Incontinence after Prostate Surgery
Jin Bak Yang, Young-Suk Lee, Deok Hyun Han, Kyu-Sung Lee
Korean J Urol.2009;50(9):854-858.   Published online 2009 September 18     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2009.50.9.854
      
5 Twenty Years of Experience with Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation
Cheol Young Oh, Seung Hwan Lee, Hyun Jin Jung, Young Jae Yim, Sang Yol Mah
Korean J Urol.2008;49(6):520-525.   Published online 2008 January 21     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2008.49.6.520
   

 1 of 1