This corrects the article "Cardioprotection via mitochondrial transplantation supports fatty acid metabolism in ischemia-reperfusion injured rat heart" on page 209.
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2024;28(3):209-217.
Published online May 1, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.3.209
The original published version of this article contained an error of figure numbers in the main text.
We would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers.
1. On page 213, in the fifth line of the right paragraph, change ‘Fig. 1’ to ‘Fig. 2’
Before correction: However, we observed inconsistencies in this result, as all isolated hearts maintained a HR within the normal range [28] seen ex vivo from stabilization to the termination of the experiment, and no statistically significant differences were detected (Fig. 1).
After correction: However, we observed inconsistencies in this result, as all isolated hearts maintained a HR within the normal range [28] seen ex vivo from stabilization to the termination of the experiment, and no statistically significant differences were detected (Fig. ).
2. On page 213, in the twelfth line of the right paragraph, change ‘Fig. 2’ to ‘Fig. 1B’
Before correction: The results revealed that the non-ischemic area in the IR group was distinctly smaller than that in the control group; this was not restored in the IR + transpl group (Fig. 2).
After correction: The results revealed that the non-ischemic area in the IR group was distinctly smaller than that in the control group; this was not restored in the IR + transpl group (Fig. 1B).
3. On page 215, in the ninth line of the left paragraph, change ‘Fig. 1’ to ‘Fig. 3’
Before correction: While our findings showed that oxygen consumption capacity was lower in the IR group than in the control group, the oxygen consumption capacity of the IR + transpl group was higher than that of the IR group, although it improved compared to that of the IR group, it did not improve sufficiently to match that of the control group (Fig. 1).
After correction: While our findings showed that oxygen consumption capacity was lower in the IR group than in the control group, the oxygen consumption capacity of the IR + transpl group was higher than that of the IR group, although it improved compared to that of the IR group, it did not improve sufficiently to match that of the control group (Fig. 3).