Mulberry (Morus alba L.) ethanol extract attenuates lipid metabolic disturbance and adipokine imbalance in high-fat fed rats

Da-jung Noh; Gun-Ae Yoon

doi:10.4162/nrp.2022.16.6.716

Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.16(Suppl 1) > 1516080369

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Noh and Yoon: Mulberry (Morus alba L.) ethanol extract attenuates lipid metabolic disturbance and adipokine imbalance in high-fat fed rats

Original Research

Nutrition Research and Practice 2022; 16(6): 716-728.

Published online: 9 May 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2022.16.6.716

Mulberry (Morus alba L.) ethanol extract attenuates lipid metabolic disturbance and adipokine imbalance in high-fat fed rats

Da-jung Noh

, Gun-Ae Yoon

Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Nursing, Healthcare Sciences and Human Ecology, Dongeui University, Busan 47340, Korea.

Correspondence Author: Gun-Ae Yoon. Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Nursing, Healthcare Sciences and Human Ecology, Dongeui University, 176 Eomgwang-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47340, Korea. Tel. +82-51-890-1592, Fax. +82-505-182-6873, gayoon@deu.ac.kr

Received 23 November 2021 Revised 21 February 2022 Accepted 25 March 2022

The Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

An imbalanced adipokine profile in obesity increases the susceptibility to obesity-related cardiometabolic alterations, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The mulberry plant has been reported to have health benefits, such as hypolipidemic and hepatoprotective effects. This study examined the effects of a mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit ethanol extract (MBEE) on dyslipidemia, liver steatosis, and adipokine imbalance in response to a high-fat diet.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to one of 4 groups containing 6 rats each and fed either a control diet (CON), a high-fat diet (HFD), or a high-fat diet with MBEE of 150 mg/kg/day (LMB) or 300 mg/kg/day (HMB). The triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities were measured spectrophotometrically. The leptin, adiponectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The plasma TG levels were similar in the 4 groups. Plasma cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and TC/HDL-C ratio increased in the HFD group compared with the CON group, whereas those values decreased in the LMB group (P < 0.05), indicating that MBEE had a plasma lipid-lowering effect. HDL-C decreased in the HFD group, but MBEE did not affect the HDL-C level. The HFD rats significantly increased hepatic TG and cholesterol levels and plasma ALT and AST activities compared to the CON group. The hepatic TG level and ALT and AST activities were reduced markedly by the MBEE treatment. The HFD group showed a higher PAI-1 level, whereas MBEE treatment, especially in the HMB group, significantly reduced leptin level, and leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios. These findings suggest that MBEE altered the imbalance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines to a more anti-inflammatory state.

CONCLUSIONS

MBEE could protect against abnormal lipid metabolism and hepatic steatosis induced by a high-fat diet, lowering plasma cholesterol, LDL-C and TC/HDL-C, and hepatic TG. These findings are associated with the regulating effect of MBEE on the leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios.

Keywords: Mulberry ethanol extract, dyslipidemia, fatty liver, adipokines

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is the central component of the pathogenesis of obesity-related diseases, including metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), dyslipidemia, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and several forms of cancer. The increased susceptibility to these diseases in obese individuals has become a significant public health issue worldwide [1]. The mechanisms linking obesity to these metabolic and vascular disorders have been proposed, but they are not completely understood. Recent evidence highlighted the action of adipose tissue in triggering a systemic inflammatory response and the role of the altered adipokines levels in the pathogenesis of obesity-associated complications [2].

Obesity is characterized by an enlarged adipose tissue mass. Adipose tissue is involved in the storage and mobilization of lipids. In addition, it is also an endocrine organ that releases numerous adipokines, affecting the metabolism and vascular function [3]. Adipokines play critical roles in different biological processes, including inflammation, glucose and lipid metabolism, blood pressure, hemostasis, endothelial function, and feeding behavior, thereby regulating the metabolism and function of many organs, such as muscle, liver, vasculature, and brain [4]. Therefore, changes in adipokines secretion promote susceptibility to inflammatory, metabolic, and cardiovascular obesity-related disorders, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear [5 6].

Leptin and adiponectin are 2 major adipokines related to the risk of metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), playing contrasting roles in the pathogenesis of many obesity-related diseases [7]. Leptin enhances lipotoxicity and insulin resistance and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [8]. In contrast, adiponectin reduces the pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, protecting against obesity-related disorders, including type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and CVD [9]. Hence, the development of obesity-related disorders has been attributed to an imbalance in adipokines. Recent accumulating data have suggested the leptin-to-adiponectin (L/A) ratio or adiponectin-to-leptin (A/L) ratio as a useful marker to determine the insulin resistance in patients with and without diabetes [10 11].

The incidence of NAFLD has also increased in parallel with the prevalence of obesity [12]. Excessive lipids usually accumulate in the liver when the influx of lipids or synthesis of hepatic lipids exceeds their export or oxidation. In an obese state, the free fatty acids from adipose tissue directly enter the liver via the portal circulation, which promotes the accumulation of lipids in the liver [13 14]. Adiponectin is an adipokine with potential beneficial effects on NAFLD, whereas others, such as leptin, resistin, and interleukin (IL)-6, have an adverse effect on NAFLD. Adiponectin reduces hepatic lipogenesis by suppressing the lipogenic transcription factor, sterol regulatory element-binding protein1-c (SREBP1-c), and enhances glucose utilization and fatty acid oxidation in the liver through activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). In addition, adiponectin exerts anti-inflammatory properties that might prevent the progression of hepatic steatosis to fibrosis [15 16]. Leptin is one of the potent regulators of NAFLD. A positive correlation of leptin with hepatic steatosis or serum ALT has been reported. Leptin has also been reported to play a role in liver fibrosis leading to cirrhosis by activating hepatic stellate cells [17].

Many bioactive food components have been assessed for their ability to prevent a wide array of chronic disorders. Natural bioactive compounds found in fruits and vegetables have attracted increasing attraction owing to their antioxidant activities and health benefits in obesity and obesity-associated metabolic abnormalities [18]. Among the natural products, mulberry, which belongs to the genus Morus of the Moraceae family, has been cultivated in many countries, including China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan [19]. Although there are limited studies on the beneficial health effects of mulberry fruits, recent studies have reported that mulberry fruit has protective properties against dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity, and liver damage [18]. Mulberry extracts have potential effects, including inhibiting hepatic triglyceride (TG) accumulation, anti-obesity, and hypolipidemic effects, and preventing atherosclerosis in a non-alcohol-induced liver disease model [20].

This study examined the protective effects of mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit ethanol extract (MBEE) on metabolic disturbances using high-fat diet-fed rats. The relationship between lipid metabolism disturbance and adipokine balance was examined in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. The effects of an MBEE treatment on dyslipidemia, hepatic fat accumulation, and adipokine imbalance were also evaluated with respect to the leptin/adiponectin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)/adiponectin ratios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal care and experimental design

Male Sprague-Dawley rats at 6 wk of age were acclimatized for 1 wk with normal rat chow pellet at room temperature. After the acclimatization period, the rats were assigned randomly to one of 4 groups of 6 rats each. The normal control group (CON) received a normal control diet (Table 1). Three groups were given a high-fat diet, of which the HFD group was given no MBEE, and the LMB and HMB groups received low-dose (150 mg/kg/day) and high-dose of MBEE (300 mg/kg/day), respectively. The rats in the LMB and HMB groups were administered MBEE through an oral gavage for 6 wk, and those in the CON and HFD groups were given an equal volume of water. The HFD, LMB, and HMB diets included 2% soybean oil to ensure sufficient essential fatty acid. MBEE was prepared from dried mulberry (Morus alba L.), which was harvested in South Chungcheong Province. Briefly, the cleaned mulberry fruits were finely powdered and extracted with 20 volumes of 80% ethanol. After incubation for 2 h in a shaking water bath set to 40°C, the extract was filtered, and the solvent was removed using a vacuum rotary evaporator. Subsequently, the filtrate was collected and lyophilized to obtain MBEE and stored at −20°C. The animals were given free access to tap water and feed. The feed consumption and weight gain were recorded weekly. This experimental protocol was approved by the Dongeui University Laboratory Animal Care Committee (R2018-010).

Table 1

Composition of the experimental diets (g/kg)

Ingredients	Control diet	High-fat diet
Casein	200	200
L-cysteine	3	3
Corn starch	530	250
Sucrose	100	200
Soybean oil	70	20
Lard	0	220
Cellulose	50	50
AIN-93 mineral mix (TD.94046)	35	35
AIN-93 vitamin mix (TD.94047)	10	10
Choline Bitartrate	2.5	2.5
Tertiary butylhydroquinone	0.014	0.014
Cholesterol	0	10

Rats were fed either a control diet, high- fat diet with no mulberry fruit ethanol extract (MBEE), high-fat diet with MBEE of 150 mg/kg/day, or high-fat diet with MBEE of 300 mg/kg/day.

Preparation of samples

After 6 wk of feeding, all animals were fasted overnight and euthanized. Blood from the abdominal aorta was collected into a lithium-heparinized tube and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The plasma was separated and stored at −70°C for later analysis. The epididymal adipose tissue was harvested and rinsed with ice-cold saline. The liver was perfused with ice-cold saline to remove the residual blood, excised, and rinsed with ice-cold 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline.

Determination of plasma lipids

The TG, total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations were quantified in plasma by spectrophotometry using a commercially available enzymatic colorimetric kit (Asan Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea). The TG levels were determined using a lipase-glycerol phosphate assay. The cholesterol measurements were based on the cholesterol oxidase method. HDL-C was determined after separating the HDL fraction using a heparin-manganese precipitation procedure. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration was calculated using the Friedewald formula [21].

Determination of adipokines

Adipokines in plasma were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using commercially available kits. Leptin, PAI-1, and adiponectin were measured on a Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan, Grödig, Austria), using an ELISA kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA), Simple Step ELISA™ kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and Quankine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), respectively. All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Determination of hepatic lipids

The hepatic lipids were extracted using a modified method reported by Folch et al. [22]. Briefly, the liver tissues were homogenized with chloroform/methanol (v/v, 1:2) using a Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder. Chloroform/distilled water (v/v, 1:1) was then added and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C to separate into 2 phases. The lower chloroform layer was collected and evaporated under N₂ gas. The liver lipid extract was dissolved in chloroform/methanol and stored at −20°C. The hepatic TG and cholesterol contents in the lipid extract were quantified using a colorimetric assay with a commercial kit (Asan Pharmaceuticals) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Determination of activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)

The plasma ALT and AST activities were determined using a colorimetric assay with commercially available kits (Asan Pharmaceuticals). The absorbance was read at 505 nm according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The values were presented as the means and SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine the differences between the means of the experimental groups. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Changes in body weight and fat mass

All 4 groups showed a similar initial body weight and feed intake, as listed in Table 2. The average weight gain and final body weight were higher in the HFD group than in the CON group, but were similar in the HFD, LMB, and HMB groups. Epididymal fat mass was significantly higher in the HFD group than in the CON group (P < 0.05). The significance remained, even when represented as mass per 100 g body weight. On the other hand, the fat mass and fat index were similar in the HFD, LMB, and HMB groups, but there was a 10% reduction of each in the HMB group compared to HFD.

Table 2

Effects of the mulberry ethanol extract on the body weight and epididymal fat mass

Variables	CON	HFD	LMB	HMB
Initial body weight (g)	221.23 ± 3.65^NS	222.46 ± 3.13	221.31 ± 3.89	221.93 ± 3.23
Final body weight (g)	401.43 ± 13.42^b	489.14 ± 15.51^a	492.57 ± 13.84^a	488.43 ± 16.12^a
Weight gain (g/week)	30.03 ± 1.90^b	44.45 ± 2.26^a	45.21 ± 2.10^a	44.42 ± 2.43^a
Feed intake (g/week)	147.13 ± 4.50^NS	137.84 ± 4.54	142.99 ± 4.86	140.20 ± 3.09
Epididymal fat (g)	7.56 ± 0.72^b	16.18 ± 1.25^a	16.37 ± 2.36^a	14.52 ± 1.16^a
Fat index	1.88 ± 0.18^b	3.29 ± 0.19^a	3.28 ± 0.41^a	2.95 ± 0.18^a

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Fat index is fat mass per 100 g body weight.

CON, control diet; HFD, high-fat diet with no mulberry fruit ethanol extract (MBEE); LMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 150 mg/kg/day; HMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 300 mg/kg/day.

^a,bValues within raw not sharing common superscript letters are significantly different using Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Changes in plasma markers of dyslipidemia

The cholesterol and LDL-C levels and TC/HDL-C ratio were significantly higher in the HFD group than in the CON group (Table 3). On the other hand, the HDL-C was lower in the HFD group than in the CON group (P < 0.05). Significant decreases in cholesterol, LDL-C, and TC/HDL-C were observed in MBEE-treated groups, particularly in the LMB group, indicating mulberry extracts had plasma lipid-lowering effects. There was no significant difference in HDL-C with MBEE administration, even though HDL-C was increased in the LMB group. No significant difference in the plasma TG level was observed among the groups. On the other hand, there was a higher tendency of TG in the HFD group, whereas the HMB group showed lower levels than the HFD group. The plasma glucose levels were significantly higher in the HFD group than in the CON group. The plasma glucose level of the HFD group was not attenuated by the MBEE treatment, but the LMB and HMB groups tended to be lower than the HFD group.

Table 3

Effects of mulberry ethanol extract on the plasma glucose and lipid metabolic parameters

Variables	CON	HFD	LMB	HMB
Glucose (mg/dL)	105.09 ± 4.85^b	128.77 ± 6.05^a	117.12 ± 7.51^ab	116.98 ± 5.40^ab
TG (mg/dL)	43.18 ± 4.05^NS	52.09 ± 4.44	47.51 ± 4.57	39.03 ± 3.70
TC (mg/dL)	93.91 ± 6.89^b	116.58 ± 6.44^a	96.81 ± 4.53^b	101.76 ± 4.10^ab
LDL-C (mg/dL)	21.25 ± 3.20^c	72.62 ± 8.81^a	43.71 ± 3.46^b	57.96 ± 4.81^ab
HDL-C (mg/dL)	71.34 ± 3.09^a	37.40 ± 4.05^b	45.44 ± 5.30^b	36.88 ± 2.77^b
TC/HDL-C ratio	1.38 ± 0.05^c	3.36 ± 0.45^a	2.27 ± 0.20^b	2.68 ± 0.16^ab

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

CON, control diet; HFD, high-fat diet with no mulberry fruit ethanol extract (MBEE); LMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 150 mg/kg/day; HMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 300 mg/kg/day; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

^a-cValues within raw not sharing common superscript letters are significantly different using Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Changes in plasma markers of inflammation

Adiponectin level was not different among the 4 groups, as shown in Fig. 1. The leptin level was significantly greater in the CON and HFD groups but lower in the LMB and HMB groups (P < 0.05). The HFD group showed a significant increase in the PAI-1 level compared to the CON group, whereas the PAI-1 levels tended to be lower in the LMB and HMB groups. The leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios in the HFD group were similar to those in the CON group. The MBEE treatment reduced both the leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios, showing a significant decrease, especially in the HMB group (P < 0.05). Overall, the MBEE treatment alters the adipokine balance to the anti-inflammatory state by reducing leptin and the leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios.

Fig. 1

Effects of mulberry ethanol extract on the plasma leptin, PAI-1, and adiponectin levels.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

^a,bData not sharing common superscript letters are significantly different using Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Changes in markers of hepatic lipid accumulation

Fig. 2 shows fat accumulation in the liver and the ALT and AST activities. The hepatic TG level was higher in the HFD group than in the CON group and significantly lower in the LMB and HMB groups. The hepatic cholesterol was higher in the HFD group than in the CON group, but was similar in the HFD, LMB, and HMB groups. The HFD group showed higher ALT and AST activities than the CON group (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the AST activity was markedly lower in the LMB and HMB groups, and the ALT activity was lower in the HMB. Moreover, the HMB group showed lower ALT and AST activities. These results suggest that HFD caused hepatic lipid accumulation accompanied by an increase in the ALT and AST activities, which could be improved by MBEE.

Fig. 2

Effects of mulberry ethanol extract on the accumulation of hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol and activities of ALT and AST.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

CON, control diet; HFD, high-fat diet with no mulberry fruit ethanol extract (MBEE); LMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 150 mg/kg/day; HMB, high-fat diet with MBEE of 300 mg/kg/day; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.

^a,bData not sharing common superscript letters are significantly different using Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Obesity, particularly visceral obesity, is related to a metabolic and cardiovascular disturbances, including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and NAFLD. The mechanism whereby the increased body fat has an adverse effect is poorly understood. An expansion of adipose tissue induces the filtration of macrophages and an imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines secreted by adipose tissue, thereby affecting inflammation, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysregulation of lipid. Adipose tissue can affect the metabolism and function of many tissues, such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and heart, by releasing free fatty acids and producing several adipokines [23]. The present study investigated the protective effects of MBEE supplementation against high-fat-induced dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, and adipokine imbalance between pro-inflammatory leptin and PAI-1 and anti-inflammatory adiponectin.

In most experimental obesity studies, the degree of obesity has been assessed by comparing the body weight or body fat of the high-fat-fed animals with the control group given a low-fat diet [24]. After feeding the experimental diets for 6 wk in this study, the body weight of the HFD group increased. Moreover, the HFD rats gained significantly higher visceral adipose tissue measured by epididymal fat mass than CON rats, resulting in an obese state. On the other hand, the MBEE treatment in LMB and HMB groups did not markedly reduce the high-fat diet-induced weight gain and adipose tissue increase. One study reported that the rats supplemented with 5% or 10% mulberry fruit powder for 4 wk showed no significant decrease in high-fat-induced body weight gain [25]. By contrast, it was reported that administration of mulberry ethanol extract for 14 wk or purified anthocyanins for 12 wk resulted in a significant decrease in weight gain and adipose hypertrophy in high-fat-fed mice, suggesting mulberry has an anti-obesity effect [26 27]. These studies suggest that the anti-obesity effects of mulberry fruits might differ according to the treatment duration and supplementation as whole food extract or isolated compounds and their preparation methods, resulting in different biological compounds.

Obesity is linked to an increased prevalence of dyslipidemia. According to Woods et al. [28], high-fat-fed rats weighed more and developed more adipose tissue than the control, having insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia typically associated with obesity. One of the major mechanisms behind dyslipidemia is the increased flux of free fatty acid (FFA) from adipose tissue to the liver through the portal vein when visceral TG stores are increased. Increased lipolytic activity in obese subjects triggers the release of FFA by adipocytes. The uncontrolled release of FFA from adipose tissue, particularly visceral adipose tissue, causes the increased flux of FFA to the liver and stimulates the synthesis and secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), as well as the suppression of lipoprotein lipase in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, leading to hypertriglyceridemia [29 30]. Hypertriglyceridemia promotes the formation of small-dense LDL particles and a decrease in HDL by cholesteryl ester transport protein and subsequent hepatic lipase [31].

HFD rats caused a disturbance of the lipid profile in the present study. The cholesterol and LDL-C plasma levels and the TC/HDL-C ratio were significantly higher in the HFD group than in the CON group. The HDL-C level was significantly lower in the HFD group than in the CON group. Significant decreases in the cholesterol and LDL-C levels and TC/HDL-C ratio were observed in the MBEE-treated groups compared to the HFD group, particularly in the LMB group. On the other hand, the plasma triglyceride levels were lower in the HMB group, but the difference was not significant. Based on these results, the dyslipidemic picture induced by a high-fat diet in the present study was alleviated by the MBEE treatment. Nevertheless, the HMB group appeared to show fewer effects on LDL-C and TC/HDL-C than a low-dose in the LMB group. Despite the lower efficacy of HMB in lowering plasma lipids, a high-dose of MBEE in HMB helped reduce the plasma lipids when comparing each variable in the HFD and HMB groups.

Adipose tissue is considered an endocrine organ releasing many bioactive mediators termed adipokines, which have diverse actions on lipid and glucose metabolism, hemostasis, blood pressure, inflammation, and endothelial function. The well-characterized adipokines are adiponectin, leptin, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and PAI-1, which could be divided into those having a positive or negative impact [32]. Leptin has pro-inflammatory and atherogenic activities, whereas adiponectin has insulin-sensitizing, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherogenic properties, as well as anti-steatotic activity in non-adipose tissues [33]. PAI-1 is involved in the inflammatory processes and inhibition of endogenous fibrinolysis. Thus, an increased PAI-1 level is responsible for thrombosis and endothelial dysfunction. PAI-1 is increased in obese subjects, which is related to dyslipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, and high blood pressure. Therefore, when aberrant production of adipokines is persistent, the body is likely to face an inflammatory and prothrombotic milieu, which can contribute to the development of obesity-linked metabolic diseases [5 6 34]. A single adipokine may not cause metabolic syndrome, but the interaction between the pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines induces systemic abnormalities while a balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines is disrupted as perivascular and visceral obesity increases. The balance between the anti- and pro-inflammatory adipokines is vital for preventing metabolic syndrome, particularly in central obese subjects [35]. The correlations of the adiponectin/leptin ratio with variations in systolic blood press, insulin sensitivity, TC, and LDL have been observed in obese metabolic syndrome patients [36]. According to a study on the relevance of the L/A ratio and lipid profiles in NAFLD, the L/A ratio correlated directly with the triglyceride level and TC/HDL-C ratio and inversely with HDL-C [37]. The L/A ratio was proposed as a parameter to determine the risk of obesity- and metabolic syndrome-related CVD. Regarding the capacity to discriminate the risk of metabolic syndrome, the L/A ratio was better than adiponectin and leptin alone among healthy individuals, suggesting that the ratio could be a significant predictor of the risk of metabolic syndrome [38].

In the present study, the adiponectin level was similar in the 4 groups. Leptin was not increased in the HFD group, but there was a significant increase in PAI-1 in the HFD group. Leptin was significantly lower in both LMB and HMB groups with MBEE treatment, and the PAI-1 level, albeit not significant, tended to be lower. Subsequently, leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios also decreased with MBEE. As a result, the HFD group appeared to show an imbalance in the production of anti-/pro-inflammatory adipokines based on the higher PAI-1 level and the higher tendency of the PAI-1/adiponectin ratio. The MBEE treatment, especially in the HMB group, altered the balance of adipokines to an anti-inflammatory state, as shown by the decrease in leptin level and the leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios. Hence, the dyslipidemia-improving effect appears to be associated with regulating the adipokine balance.

NAFLD is one of the most common complications of obesity and is generally regarded as a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Hepatic steatosis, the hallmark of NAFLD, is the progression of excessive triglyceride accumulation by the metabolic disturbances between lipid uptake, synthesis, catabolism, and secretion [39]. The HFD group showed significantly higher hepatic TG and cholesterol levels than the CON group and higher plasma ALT and AST activities, which are serum indicators of liver injury and function. The hepatic TG was higher in the HFD groups but lower in the LMB and HMB groups. In addition, the ALT and AST activities were significantly lower in the MBEE-treated groups, notably in the HMB group. Overall, the HFD induced hepatic lipid accumulation, accompanied by an elevation of ALT and AST activities. The MBEE treatment improved the hepatic steatosis and lowered the ALT and AST activities.

A previous study reported that body fat mass and liver fat were positively correlated with the amount of VLDL1 apolipoprotein B and VLDL1 TG production rate [40] and that hypertriglyceridemia in metabolic syndrome is related to the over-secretion of TG-rich VLDL particles [30]. On the other hand, a positive correlation was not always observed between the plasma TG and hepatic steatosis [41]. Some studies suggested that the effects of mulberry on the relationship between the plasma TG and hepatic TG were inconsistent. The MBEE in the present study induced a significant decrease in hepatic TG but not at the plasma TG level. In agreement with the present findings, the administration of mulberry ethanol extract (100 mg/kg/day) to high-fat-fed mice revealed a decrease in hepatic TG and no change in plasma TG [26]. By contrast, supplementation of high-fat-fed rats with freeze-dried mulberry powder reduced the serum and hepatic TG levels [25]. Furthermore, mice fed black elderberry extract rich in anthocyanins showed a significant reduction in serum TG level but no improvement in the hepatic TG [42].

The pathogenesis of NAFLD involves dysfunction in adipose tissue, insulin resistance, and inflammation, but the mechanism is not yet completely understood [39]. The roles of leptin and adiponectin have attracted increasing attention regarding the NAFLD pathophysiology, diagnosis, and even treatment. A recent study examined the role of circulating adipokines as a potential non-invasive biomarker for NAFLD diagnosis and stratification. Higher circulating leptin was related to a higher serum lipid profile and a higher hepatic steatosis grade when evaluated using histology and imaging.

Adiponectin was negatively correlated with the liver fat contents, suggesting a protective role of adiponectin by causing lipid disposal from the liver into circulation [43]. Furthermore, adiponectin inhibits hepatic lipid deposition by stimulating fatty acid oxidation via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) [44]. In addition, the adiponectin level is inversely correlated with the serum indicators of liver injury, ALT and AST, suggesting a role in preventing liver damage. The serum leptin level was higher in patients with severe liver steatosis, whereas adiponectin decreased with the severity of steatosis [43].

Considering the relationship between leptin and adiponectin and liver steatosis, these hepatoprotective results by MBEE appeared to be related to the lower leptin level, and the lower leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios. A recent study reported that ALT and AST had a positive correlation with hepatic triglyceride accumulation [45]. The high-fat diet-induced increases in hepatic TG and cholesterol levels and serum ALT and AST levels were reduced significantly by the mulberry ethanol extract [26]. The anti-hepatosteatosis effects of mulberry were attributed to its ability to inhibit fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis and promote fatty acid oxidation [26 46]. In ethanol-induced liver injury mice, a mulberry water extract (MWE) reduced both hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol and reduced the levels of liver injury biomarkers, ALT and AST. The hepatoprotective effect of MWE might be mediated by multiple pathways. A previous study suggested that MWE treatment inhibits lipogenesis and hepatic lipid accumulation and increases the hepatic expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein for fatty acid oxidation or transport by activating AMPK and PPAR-α. In addition, MWE suppresses lipid peroxidation and inflammation by enhancing the antioxidative activity and decreasing pro-inflammatory mediators [20]. Based on previous reports and the present results, mulberry might be a potential candidate for preventing NAFLD by reducing hepatic lipid deposition and inhibiting hepatic steatosis.

Polyphenols provide health benefits. Mulberry fruit contains considerable amounts of biologically active ingredients, including phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and many other antioxidants, which might have some beneficial activities, such as anti-obesity, anti-cholesterol, and hepatoprotective effects [18]. Given the complexity and breadth of polyphenols as a chemical family, the physicochemical characteristics of polyphenols are likely to contribute to the disparity in results between studies. As the main components of mulberry fruit, anthocyanins could play a significant role in promoting health. On the other hand, it was suggested that the health outcomes observed might not be due to the action of a single bioactive compound in mulberry fruit but to the cooperative action of diverse compounds, including anthocyanins, flavonoids, and phenolics [47]. Furthermore, freeze-dried mulberry fruit powder has high dietary fiber contents, antioxidant vitamins, and linoleic acid, which might play a role in the hypolipidemic effects [25]. Therefore, further studies will be needed to determine the main bioactive components and mechanisms that may be responsible for the effects of mulberry on metabolic disturbances. In addition, it is important to consider the adverse effects of MBEE. Information on the safe dose of mulberry regarding the possible adverse effects on animal health is lacking. No adverse effects on the changes in liver or renal functions were reported in rabbits fed high cholesterol diet supplemented with a 0.5% and 1.0% water extract of mulberry fruit [48]. The 2 levels of MBEE used in the present study also appear harmless, based on no significant decreases in growth and feed intake and no significant liver damage. Nevertheless, the safe dose of mulberry fruit and its treatment duration remains to be determined owing to limited data regarding adverse effects.

This study showed that a high-fat diet induced dyslipidemia with increases in plasma cholesterol and LDL-C level and TC/HDL-C ratio. Increases in hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol accumulation and higher activities of ALT and AST were also observed, suggesting the risk of developing hepatic steatosis. The administration of MBEE improved the plasma cholesterol and LDL-C levels and TC/HDL-C ratio. In addition, it also attenuated the hepatic triglyceride level and ALT and AST activities. Moreover, the adipokine equilibrium was altered towards a more anti-inflammatory state, as revealed by the lower leptin level and leptin/adiponectin and PAI-1/adiponectin ratios. Therefore, mulberry fruit ethanol extract could have anti-lipidemic and hepatoprotective effects by regulating the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines.

Notes

Funding: This work was supported by Dongeui University Foundation Grant (2019).

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.

Author Contributions:

Conceptualization: Yoon GA.
Data curation: Noh DJ.
Formal analysis: Noh DJ.
Funding acquisition: Yoon GA.
Investigation: Noh DJ.
Writing - original draft: Yoon GA.
Writing - review & editing: Yoon GA.

References

1. Kishida K, Funahashi T, Shimomura I. Clinical importance of assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with visceral obesity. A Japanese perspective. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2012; 8:84–91. PMID: 22309596.

2. Calabrò P, Limongelli G, Pacileo G, Di Salvo G, Golino P, Calabrò R. The role of adiposity as a determinant of an inflammatory milieu. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008; 9:450–460. PMID: 18403996.

3. Golia E, Limongelli G, Natale F, Fimiani F, Maddaloni V, Russo PE, Riegler L, Bianchi R, Crisci M, Palma GD, et al. Adipose tissue and vascular inflammation in coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol. 2014; 6:539–554. PMID: 25068015.

4. Fasshauer M, Blüher M. Adipokines in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015; 36:461–470. PMID: 26022934.

5. Ouchi N, Parker JL, Lugus JJ, Walsh K. Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011; 11:85–97. PMID: 21252989.

6. Maresca F, Di Palma V, Bevilacqua M, Uccello G, Taglialatela V, Giaquinto A, Esposito G, Trimarco B, Cirillo P. Adipokines, vascular wall, and cardiovascular disease: a focused overview of the role of adipokines in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Angiology. 2015; 66:8–24. PMID: 24535638.

7. Adolph TE, Grander C, Grabherr F, Tilg H. Adipokines and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: multiple interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18:1649–1663. PMID: 28758929.

8. Ge F, Zhou S, Hu C, Lobdell H 4th, Berk PD. Insulin- and leptin-regulated fatty acid uptake plays a key causal role in hepatic steatosis in mice with intact leptin signaling but not in ob/ob or db/db mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010; 299:G855–G866. PMID: 20595619.

9. Yanai H, Yoshida H. Beneficial effects of adiponectin on glucose and lipid metabolism and atherosclerotic progression: mechanisms and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:1190–1214. PMID: 30857216.

10. López-Jaramillo P, Gómez-Arbeláez D, López-López J, López-López C, Martínez-Ortega J, Gómez-Rodríguez A, Triana-Cubillos S. The role of leptin/adiponectin ratio in metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2014; 18:37–45.

11. Kotani K, Sakane N, Saiga K, Kurozawa Y. Leptin : adiponectin ratio as an atherosclerotic index in patients with type 2 diabetes : relationship of the index to carotid intima-media thickness. Diabetologia. 2005; 48:2684–2686. PMID: 16261311.

12. López-Velázquez JA, Silva-Vidal KV, Ponciano-Rodríguez G, Chávez-Tapia NC, Arrese M, Uribe M, Méndez-Sánchez N. The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas. Ann Hepatol. 2014; 13:166–178. PMID: 24552858.

13. Bradbury MW, Berk PD. Lipid metabolism in hepatic steatosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2004; 8:639–671. PMID: 15331068.

14. Heilbronn L, Smith SR, Ravussin E. Failure of fat cell proliferation, mitochondrial function and fat oxidation results in ectopic fat storage, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004; 28(Suppl 4):S12–S21. PMID: 15592481.

15. Shklyaev S, Aslanidi G, Tennant M, Prima V, Kohlbrenner E, Kroutov V, Campbell-Thompson M, Crawford J, Shek EW, Scarpace PJ, et al. Sustained peripheral expression of transgene adiponectin offsets the development of diet-induced obesity in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:14217–14222. PMID: 14617771.

16. Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Minokoshi Y, Ito Y, Waki H, Uchida S, Yamashita S, Noda M, Kita S, Ueki K, et al. Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nat Med. 2002; 8:1288–1295. PMID: 12368907.

17. Ikejima K, Honda H, Yoshikawa M, Hirose M, Kitamura T, Takei Y, Sato N. Leptin augments inflammatory and profibrogenic responses in the murine liver induced by hepatotoxic chemicals. Hepatology. 2001; 34:288–297. PMID: 11481614.

18. Zhang H, Ma ZF, Luo X, Li X. Effect of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.) consumption and health outcomes: a mini-review. Antioxidants. 2018; 7:69–81. PMID: 29883416.

19. Ahanger MR, Ramegowda GK, Rizvi G, Dhar A, Sahaf KA. Reaction of mulberry germplasm to frost damage in Kashmir. Res J Agric Sci. 2013; 4:180–184.

20. Tang CC, Huang HP, Lee YJ, Tang YH, Wang CJ. Hepatoprotective effect of mulberry water extracts on ethanol-induced liver injury via anti-inflammation and inhibition of lipogenesis in C57BL/6J mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013; 62:786–796. PMID: 24140469.

21. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18:499–502. PMID: 4337382.

22. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226:497–509. PMID: 13428781.

23. Jung UJ, Choi MS. Obesity and its metabolic implications: the Role of adipokines and the relationship between obesity, inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15:6184–6223. PMID: 24733068.

24. Abdul Kadir NA, Rahmat A, Jaafar HZ. Protective effects of Tamarillo (Cyphomandra betacea) extract against high fat diet induced obesity in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Obes. 2015; 2015:846041. PMID: 26171246.

25. Yang X, Yang L, Zheng H. Hypolipidemic and antioxidant effects of mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruit in hyperlipidaemia rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48:2374–2379. PMID: 20561945.

26. Song H, Lai J, Tang Q, Zheng X. Mulberry ethanol extract attenuates hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice. Nutr Res. 2016; 36:710–718. PMID: 27262537.

27. Kim HB, Go EJ, Ryu BR, Shin YR, Yang SJ, Back JS, Lim JD. Anti-obesity effect of mulberry anthocyanins in C57BL/6J mice. Hanguk Yakyong Changmul Hakhoe Chi. 2021; 29:317–327.

28. Woods SC, Seeley RJ, Rushing PA, D’Alessio D, Tso P. A controlled high-fat diet induces an obese syndrome in rats. J Nutr. 2003; 133:1081–1087. PMID: 12672923.

29. Saleh J, Sniderman AD, Cianflone K. Regulation of plasma fatty acid metabolism. Clin Chim Acta. 1999; 286:163–180. PMID: 10511290.

30. Marsh JB. Lipoprotein metabolism in obesity and diabetes: insights from stable isotope kinetic studies in humans. Nutr Rev. 2003; 61:363–375. PMID: 14677571.

31. Aguilera CM, Gil-Campos M, Cañete R, Gil A. Alterations in plasma and tissue lipids associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008; 114:183–193. PMID: 18184112.

32. Hutley L, Prins JB. Fat as an endocrine organ: relationship to the metabolic syndrome. Am J Med Sci. 2005; 330:280–289. PMID: 16355012.

33. Goldstein BJ, Scalia R. Adiponectin: a novel adipokine linking adipocytes and vascular function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89:2563–2568. PMID: 15181024.

34. Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC, Mavri A, Morange PE. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, inflammation, obesity, insulin resistance and vascular risk. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1:1575–1579. PMID: 12871293.

35. Meiliana A, Wijaya A, As’ad S. The relationship of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory adipokines in the development of metabolic syndrome in centrally obese men. Indones Biomed J. 2010; 2:118–125.

36. Masquio DC, de Piano A, Campos RM, Sanches PL, Carnier J, Corgosinho FC, Netto BD, Carvalho-Ferreira JP, Oyama LM, Nascimento CM, et al. The role of multicomponent therapy in the metabolic syndrome, inflammation and cardiovascular risk in obese adolescents. Br J Nutr. 2015; 113:1920–1930. PMID: 25907896.

37. Mikami K, Endo T, Sawada N, Igarashi G, Kimura M, Hasegawa T, Iino C, Tomita H, Sawada K, Nakaji S, et al. Leptin/adiponectin ratio correlates with hepatic steatosis but not arterial stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese population. Cytokine. 2020; 126:154927. PMID: 31756645.

38. Adejumo EN, Adejumo OA, Azenabor A, Ekun AO, Enitan SS, Adebola OK, Ogundahunsi OA. Leptin: adiponectin ratio discriminated the risk of metabolic syndrome better than adiponectin and leptin in Southwest Nigeria. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019; 13:1845–1849. PMID: 31235104.

39. Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2018; 24:908–922. PMID: 29967350.

40. Packard CJ, Boren J, Taskinen MR. Causes and consequences of hypertriglyceridemia. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020; 11:252–266. PMID: 32477261.

41. Alves-Bezerra M, Cohen DE. Triglyceride metabolism in the liver. Compr Physiol. 2017; 8:1–8. PMID: 29357123.

42. Farrell NJ, Norris GH, Ryan J, Porter CM, Jiang C, Blesso CN. Black elderberry extract attenuates inflammation and metabolic dysfunction in diet-induced obese mice. Br J Nutr. 2015; 114:1123–1131. PMID: 26314315.

43. Marques V, Afonso MB, Bierig N, Duarte-Ramos F, Santos-Laso Á, Jimenez-Agüero R, Eizaguirre E, Bujanda L, Pareja MJ, Luís R, et al. Adiponectin, leptin, and IGF-1 are useful diagnostic and stratification biomarkers of NAFLD. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:683250. PMID: 34249975.

44. Achari AE, Jain SK. Adiponectin, a therapeutic target for obesity, diabetes, and endothelial dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18:1321–1337. PMID: 28635626.

45. Bril F, Barb D, Portillo-Sanchez P, Biernacki D, Lomonaco R, Suman A, Weber MH, Budd JT, Lupi ME, Cusi K. Metabolic and histological implications of intrahepatic triglyceride content in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2017; 65:1132–1144. PMID: 27981615.

46. Chang JJ, Hsu MJ, Huang HP, Chung DJ, Chang YC, Wang CJ. Mulberry anthocyanins inhibit oleic acid induced lipid accumulation by reduction of lipogenesis and promotion of hepatic lipid clearance. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61:6069–6076. PMID: 23731091.

47. Jiang Y, Dai M, Nie WJ, Yang XR, Zeng XC. Effects of the ethanol extract of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) fruit on experimental atherosclerosis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017; 200:228–235. PMID: 28242382.

48. Chen CC, Liu LK, Hsu JD, Huang HP, Yang MY, Wang CJ. Mulberry extract inhibits the development of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Food Chem. 2005; 91:601–607.

TOOLS

Similar articles