Abstract
Background
To date, no study has investigated whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have a clinical value in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-pulmonary disease (PD).
Methods
We aimed to assess whether the baseline NLR and MLR were different according to the severity of MAC-PD based on the radiologic classification by retrospectively analyzing 549 patients treated in a tertiary referral center in South Korea.
Graphical Abstract
The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are readily available laboratory markers calculated from a complete blood count (CBC). Previous studies have reported that both NLR and MLR were useful laboratory markers of the severity, treatment response, or recurrence of pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis.12345 Although the clinical characteristics of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-pulmonary disease (PD) are similar to those of tuberculosis in many aspects, such as symptoms, radiologic findings, or treatment regimen,6 to date, no study has investigated the value of NLR and MLR in MAC-PD. Therefore, we aimed to assess this issue in patients with MAC-PD. Considering that, notably, NLR and MLR were associated with tuberculosis severity, we investigated whether the baseline NLR and MLR were different according to the severity of MAC-PD based on the radiologic classification.
Patients were enrolled in the Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea. From 2001 to 2019, 1,148 patients with MAC-PD who had initiated treatment with a macrolide-containing regimen were identified. We excluded those 1) who did not undergo CBC examination within 90 days prior to treatment initiation (n = 384), 2) whose computed tomography (CT) findings were categorized as unclassifiable type (n = 150), and 3) who had comorbidities that could affect the results of white blood cell differential count, including liver disease (n = 24), infectious disease such as pneumonia (n = 21), were receiving calcineurin inhibitor (n = 7) or anti-cancer chemotherapy (n = 6), and others (n = 7). The medical records of the remaining patients were retrospectively analyzed in November 2021.
Radiologic findings on chest CT were classified into one of the three major types: fibrocavitary (FC), cavitary nodular bronchiectatic (C-NB), and non-cavitary nodular bronchiectatic (NC-NB) types.7 The baseline NLR and MLR were compared according to each radiologic type. NLR and MLR were calculated from peripheral CBC. An automatic blood count device was employed for the analysis of CBC. NLR and MLR were determined as follows: NLR = Absolute Neutrophil Count/Absolute Lymphocyte Count, MLR = Absolute Monocyte Count/Absolute Lymphocyte Count.4
All data are presented as means ± standard deviation or as medians (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables. The baseline NLR and MLR values according to radiologic classification were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. For statistical analysis, an IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used.
The eligibility screening identified 549 patients with MAC-PD, including 95, 176, and 278 patients with FC, C-NB, and NC-NB types, respectively. Their median age was 64.0 (IQR, 56.0–72.0) years, and women were predominant (61.4%). The mean body mass index was 20.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2. Sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear positivity was noted in 49.0% of the patients. As shown in Table 1, a statistically significant difference was noted in terms of age, gender, body mass index, smoking history, etiologic organism, and sputum AFB smear positivity.
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or frequencies (%).
FC = fibrocavitary, C-NB = cavitary nodular bronchiectatic, NC-NB = non-cavitary nodular bronchiectatic.
aThe extent of the involved lobe was assessed according to how many of the six lung lobes were involved, considering the lingular segment to be a separate lobe.
The baseline NLR of the 549 patients was 2.16 (IQR, 1.47–3.25). As shown in Fig. 1A, NLR was significantly higher in the FC type (3.33 [IQR, 2.49–4.50]), followed by that in the C-NB type (2.34 [IQR, 1.60–3.55]), and significantly lower in the NC-NB type (1.88 [IQR, 1.30–2.44]) (P < 0.001). In addition, the baseline MLR of the 549 patients was 0.27 (IQR, 0.20–0.39), and it was significantly higher in the FC type (0.43 [IQR, 0.30–0.57]), followed by that in the C-NB type (0.27 [IQR, 0.21–0.40]), and NC-NB type (0.23 [IQR, 0.18–0.31]) (P < 0.001), as shown in Fig. 1B.
Although previous studies have shown that NLR and MLR are related to the treatment outcomes or severity of tuberculosis,1245 whether these two laboratory markers would also have a clinical value in MAC-PD has not been assessed, so far. This study investigated this aspect by retrospectively analyzing 549 patients with MAC-PD in a tertiary referral center in South Korea. We found a distinct difference in the baseline NLR and MLR according to the radiologic severity of MAC-PD; both NLR and MLR showed higher values when the radiologic findings of MAC-PD were more severe.
Radiologic classification has vital importance in MAC-PD regarding various aspects including the treatment regimen, outcome, and prognosis. In terms of drug regimen composition, an intermittent oral-drug therapy is recommended for patients with NC-NB type, whereas an aminoglycoside-containing daily regimen is recommended for those with cavitary type (i.e., FC and C-NB types).6 Notably, the treatment success rate for cavitary MAC-PD was reported to be significantly lower than that for NC-NB type despite receiving standard treatment.7 In addition, significant difference in the mortality rate was noted according to the radiologic type of MAC-PD. A recent study reported that the overall survival rates were higher in patients with NC-NB type than in those with a cavitary disease, and those patients with C-NB type showed mortality rates intermediate between those of NC-NB and FC forms.8
These clinical differences according to radiologic classification could be explained by cavitation, which indicates a higher mycobacterial burden in MAC-PD.9 Therefore, it can be predicted that the presence of cavity is accompanied by a severe overall inflammatory response. In general, the immune responses of circulating leukocytes to various inflammatory events are characterized by an increased number of neutrophils in the peripheral blood.10 In the case of tuberculosis, extensive neutrophilic response is a sign of severity and has been particularly related to tissue destruction.11 Neutrophilia is independently associated with a higher risk of cavity formation.12 Additionally, an increase in matrix metalloproteinase-8-expressing neutrophil was related to cavitation in tuberculosis.9 Moreover, monocytes are one of the essential components of the innate immune responses and act as a link to the adaptive immune system.4 Therefore, as the disease progresses, the number of monocytes derived from the hematopoietic stem cells could increase to phagocytize and restrict mycobacterium.13 An ongoing immune response against the cavitary lesion could result in further increase in the percentage of blood monocytes.141516 Moreover, lymphopenia could result from the accumulation of lymphocytes at the infection site, leading to their decreased number in the peripheral blood.17 These theoretical changes in neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes can reasonably explain why NLR and MLR were increased in accordance with the radiologic severity in MAC-PD.
Only those patients who received treatment were included in this study. This is because patients with cavitary form MAC-PD without treatment are rarely encountered, as immediate treatment initiation is recommended for this type.18 When we performed the same analysis in patients with MAC-PD who did not receive treatment using the data of the patients enrolled in our previous study,19 we found a statistical difference in NLR and MLR between the cavitary vs. non-cavitary type (Supplementary Fig. 1). However, the number of patients with cavitary type was too small to analyze.
There may be other laboratory test results that can be related to the radiologic severity of MAC-PD including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), or platelet count considering that previous studies have shown these inflammatory markers were associated with severity or the immune response of mycobacterial disease.202122 We compared the ESR, CRP, or platelet count according to the radiologic classification among a portion of patients in this study for whom these inflammatory markers were measured, the results of which are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. As the Figure denotes, statistically significant differences in CRP and platelet count were noted among the three groups. Besides laboratory markers, the extent of radiologic involvement could also reflect the severity of MAC-PD. Additional analysis and results regarding whether the baseline NLR and MLR differ according to the number of involved lobes in each radiologic type, are summarized in Supplementary Fig. 3.
This study had some limitations; the most significant limitation being that it was conducted at a single referral center, and it had a retrospective design. Second, although NLR and MLR were measured in all the enrolled patients within 90 days of treatment initiation, the measured time points were slightly different for each patient. It was unclear whether the slightly different measurement time points for each patient affected the overall results of NLR and MLR. Finally, whether NLR and MLR could be used as a marker to predict treatment outcomes was not assessed. Further studies are needed to determine whether these values at baseline or during treatment are related to treatment outcomes in terms of treatment success or mortality.
In conclusion, this study showed that the baseline NLR and MLR had a distinct difference in accordance with the radiologic severity of MAC-PD.
Notes
References
1. Han Y, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Sim YS, Ryu YJ, Chang JH, et al. High blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio associated with poor outcomes in miliary tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(1):339–346. PMID: 29600065.
2. Yin Y, Kuai S, Liu J, Zhang Y, Shan Z, Gu L, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood was associated with pulmonary tuberculosis retreatment. Arch Med Sci. 2017; 13(2):404–411. PMID: 28261295.
3. Iliaz S, Iliaz R, Ortakoylu G, Bahadir A, Bagci BA, Caglar E. Value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis and tuberculosis. Ann Thorac Med. 2014; 9(4):232–235. PMID: 25276243.
4. Ngahane BH, Ebenezer AT, Eveline ND, Raïssa MN, Fernando KL, Lum CV, et al. Diagnostic value of leukocyte count abnormalities in newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients. Open J Respir Dis. 2019; 10(1):1–10.
5. Wang W, Wang LF, Liu YY, Yang F, Zhu L, Zhang XH. Value of the ratio of monocytes to lymphocytes for monitoring tuberculosis therapy. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019; 3270393. PMID: 31263513.
6. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ Jr, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71(4):e1–36. PMID: 32628747.
7. Koh WJ, Moon SM, Kim SY, Woo MA, Kim S, Jhun BW, et al. Outcomes of Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease based on clinical phenotype. Eur Respir J. 2017; 50(3):1602503. PMID: 28954780.
8. Jhun BW, Moon SM, Jeon K, Kwon OJ, Yoo H, Carriere KC, et al. Prognostic factors associated with long-term mortality in 1445 patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a 15-year follow-up study. Eur Respir J. 2020; 55(1):1900798. PMID: 31619468.
9. Ong CW, Elkington PT, Friedland JS. Tuberculosis, pulmonary cavitation, and matrix metalloproteinases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 190(1):9–18. PMID: 24713029.
10. Yoon NB, Son C, Um SJ. Role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in the differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Lab Med. 2013; 33(2):105–110. PMID: 23482854.
11. Lyadova IV. Neutrophils in tuberculosis: heterogeneity shapes the way? Mediators Inflamm. 2017; 2017:8619307. PMID: 28626346.
12. de Melo MG, Mesquita ED, Oliveira MM, da Silva-Monteiro C, Silveira AK, Malaquias TS, et al. Imbalance of NET and alpha-1-antitrypsin in tuberculosis patients is related with hyper inflammation and severe lung tissue damage. Front Immunol. 2019; 9:3147. PMID: 30687336.
13. Fenton MJ, Vermeulen MW. Immunopathology of tuberculosis: roles of macrophages and monocytes. Infect Immun. 1996; 64(3):683–690. PMID: 8641767.
14. Lavalett L, Ortega H, Barrera LF. Infection of monocytes from tuberculosis patients with two virulent clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces alterations in myeloid effector functions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020; 10:163. PMID: 32391286.
15. Rakotosamimanana N, Richard V, Raharimanga V, Gicquel B, Doherty TM, Zumla A, et al. Biomarkers for risk of developing active tuberculosis in contacts of TB patients: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46(4):1095–1103. PMID: 26250497.
16. Urbanowski ME, Ordonez AA, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Jain SK, Bishai WR. Cavitary tuberculosis: the gateway of disease transmission. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(6):e117–e128. PMID: 32482293.
17. Cohen R, Muzaffar S, Capellan J, Azar H, Chinikamwala M. The validity of classic symptoms and chest radiographic configuration in predicting pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 1996; 109(2):420–423. PMID: 8620716.
18. Kwon YS, Koh WJ. Diagnosis and treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(5):649–659. PMID: 27134484.
19. Kwon BS, Lee JH, Koh Y, Kim WS, Song JW, Oh YM, et al. The natural history of non-cavitary nodular bronchiectatic Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Respir Med. 2019; 150:45–50. PMID: 30961950.
20. Kim HJ, Kwak N, Hong H, Kang N, Im Y, Jhun BW, et al. BACES score for predicting mortality in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 203(2):230–236. PMID: 32721164.
21. Kwas H, Guermazi E, Zendah I, Ben Jemia E, Khattab A, Khouaja I, et al. C-reactive protein and pulmonary tuberculosis: what correlation with disease severity. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46:PA2751.
22. Kirwan DE, Chong DL, Friedland JS. Platelet activation and the immune response to tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:631696. PMID: 34093524.