INTRODUCTION
The infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPBSN) is a purely sensory branch of the femoral nerve, originating from the third and fourth lumbar nerve roots. Within the proximal third of thigh, the nerve enters the adductor canal. Here, the nerve joins with descending genicular artery and both the nerve and the artery pierce the adductor canal. After the saphenous nerve exits the adductor canal, it gives rise to the IPBSN. The IPBSN runs under the sartorius muscle. After penetrating the sartorius muscle and fascia lata to become subcutaneous, it runs superficially over the anteroinferior and medial aspect of knee [
12345]. IPBSN is connected to the medial and intermediate femoral cutaneous nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the proximal to the knee, and to the other branches of the saphenous nerve in the distal to the knee, to form a cutaneous network called the peripatellar plexus [
6].
IPBSN injury may result from non-traumatic, traumatic, or iatrogenic cause. Especially, there are numerous reports on IPBSN injury due to various surgical procedures on the medial aspect of knee [
789].
Since patients with IPBSN injury suffer solely reported sensory abnormality around the knee (a subjective complaint dependent upon patient report) and in the absence of objective evidence such motor weakness, many clinicians overlook other evidence of trauma during clinical evaluation, diagnosis. This, in turn, effects the nature and duration of the treatment plan. Furthermore, the source of the knee pain is not always clear; knee/leg pain may be mistaken for an abnormality arising from a variety of anatomic structures, focal to the knee joint or actually emanating from another body part, such as the lumbar spine in the form of radicular symptoms or actual lumbar radiculopathy [
1011]. Therefore, IPBSN nerve conduction studies are critical and integral for the purpose of ruling in, or gruling out, a focal knee joint problem or medical issue arising from other etiology when IPBSN injury is suspected.
However, there have been documented variations in course and branching pattern of IPBSN by several studies and in particular, anatomical reference point(s) for IPBSN nerve conduction studies have not, as yet, been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the relative location of the IPBSN based on anatomical landmarks through cadaveric study, and to identify the optimal stimulation and recording point for use in IPBSN nerve conduction studies. In addition, we performed sensory nerve conduction studies at the obtained optimal stimulation and recording site to confirm that the obtained location is clinically applicable, and to propose the reference value.
DISCUSSION
The goal of this study was to identify the optimal stimulation and recording point for use and reference value of IPBSN nerve conduction studies, through cadaveric and clinical study.
This study contributed to our understanding of the course of IPBSN. It exits the sartorius muscle to subcutaneous in thigh, extends distally toward knee and terminates at the level of the patella ligament.
Since IPBSN runs superficially right below the knee, there is significant chance of injury due to trauma or and iatrogenic procedure [
78910]. Clinically, patients with IPBSN lesion complain of pain and sensory disturbance such as numbness, lack of feeling, or paresthesia on the anteroinferior and medial knee. These clinical symptoms may masquerade as pes anserine bursitis, patellofemoral disorder, tear of medial meniscus and/or arthritis of knee. Also, IPBSN neuropathy is often misinterpreted as lumbar radiculopathy or femoral neuropathy. This is why proper electrophysiological evaluation of IPBSN is fundamental to the evaluation of sensory disturbance of knee.
There are number of studies about IPBSN conduction study. There is an electrophysiological study of IPBSN neuropathy regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstrings technique. In this study, authors applied electric stimulation 4 cm below the articular line, medial to the patella [
12]. However, it is difficult to conduct such studies en bloc on IPBSN, due to its high variability. Also, although the recording site was not explicitly stated, the orthodromic sensory nerve conduction study recorded on the medial surface of the leg does not clearly suggest a lesion of IPBSN. Furthermore, depending on the thigh circumference, SNAP may not be observed, or might be discerned only at low amplitude.
Another electrophysiological study of IPBSN set the stimulation site 2 cm below the patella in medial knee, and the recording site at 2 cm lateral to the femoral artery in the inguinal region using needle electrode [
3]. As an aside, this particular method could lead to pain and complication(s) such as hematoma due to needle insertion. Moreover, the long distance between stimulation site and recording site cause phase cancellation and temporal dispersion, which cause diminished SNAP amplitude.
Likewise, there are only a few IPBSN conduction study and each study demonstrate different locations of stimulation and recording sites. Accordingly, proper localization of stimulation and recording site using anatomical landmarks for IPBSN conduction study is necessary. This is the first study to propose an ideal stimulation site and recording sites of the IPBSN with objective coordinates based on anatomical landmarks for effective IPBSN nerve conduction study.
In this study, optimal stimulation site was defined as ‘the location where the IPBSN exits the sartorius muscle, penetrates the fascia lata and becomes superficial’. This point enables the stimulation to reach directly over the nerve. Placement of the stimulator at the optimal location assures the highest SNAP amplitude with the least stimulus intensity. Also, stimulating the nerve at this location provides supramaximal stimulation with little current which minimizes the pain of patients and reduces the technical errors such as depolarizing nearby adjacent nerves.
In antidromic study of the sensory nerve, the entire nerve including motor branch is depolarized frequently, inducing a volume-conducted motor potential. This potential is often misinterpreted as SNAP in pathologic condition where sensory potential is absent. However, in this study, the possibility of volume conduction could be excluded because IPBSN is pure sensory branch of femoral nerve.
We identified three anatomical variations of the IPBSN in relation to the sartorius muscle. In this study, most common type was the penetrating type (50.0%), which was consistent to previous studies [
24], but contradictory to one of the studies [
1] where the most common was anterior type. Pes anserine type was not observed in this study, which was observed in one of the previous studies [
4]. This differences between the cadaveric studies may be due to the difference in number of specimen(s) or ethnic variation(s).
There are several cadaveric studies about injury of terminal branch of IPBSN with the history of surgery on knee. In this cadaveric study, the IPBSN commonly gave its terminal branches in between patella and tibial tuberosity, as was demonstrated in previous cadaveric study(s) [
1]. This location is 15.92 mm below inferior pole of patella in average and is consistent with a IPBSN nerve conduction study, where stimulation site is 2 cm below the patella in medial knee [
3]. In addition, we measured the acute angle of the terminal branch of the IPBSN in relation to a perpendicular line to the imaginary line connecting patella and tibial tuberosity (considering the arc-like course of the IPBSN). The mean angle was 16.58°, which was consistent with the findings revealed by a previous cadaveric study [
5].
Based on our findings, we recommend the optimal stimulation site for IPBSN nerve conduction study as approximately 5.0–6.0 cm medial to medial pole of the patella and 25% of thigh length proximal to the reference line, which connects medial and lateral pole of patella. Also, we recommend the optimal recording sites to be approximately 1.5–2.0 cm below inferior pole of patella and place the pair of recording electrodes along the course of IPBSN, which is approximately 17° to the horizontal line.
In sensory nerve conduction studies, if sufficient SNAP of IPBSN was not observed, we moved the stimulator slightly anterior or posterior to the sartorius muscle, and the recording electrodes repositioned slightly proximally or distally between patella and tibial tuberosity regarding anatomical variations. In this process, muscle twitching occurred easily by direct muscle stimulation. In this case, the stimulation position, duration, and intensity were changed to avoid volume conduction artifact. Also, in order to select a clear stimulation location, patients were asked whether the pins-and-needles sensation occurred at the medial knee site during stimulation.
There are few limitations in our study. We dissected total of 12 lower limbs which are, relatively speaking, a small sample size. Also, the mean age of specimens was 69 years old, which is quite elderly. In electrophysiologic study, there was no significant correlation between the mean values of each group divided by age and gender, which may be due to the relatively small sample size. In addition and in accordance with the anatomical variation(s) mentioned above, there also exists the possibility that other sensory nerves in the vicinity may be stimulated in the electrophysiologic study. However, we have confirmed through clinical studies that this location is applicable to healthy adults of various ages. Moreover and as best as we can determine, our study is the first to demonstrate the optimal stimulation site, recording site and its reference value for IPBSN nerve conduction study, therefore, this study can serve as a starting point for further studies using a lager age variation and larger sample size.
In conclusion, we have explored and evaluated the anatomical location of optimal stimulation site and recording site for more effective IPBSN conduction study. The optimal stimulation site was located 5.0–6.0 cm medial to medial pole of the patella and 25% of thigh length proximal to the X-axis, and the optimal recording site was located 1.5–2.0 cm below inferior pole of patella. Mean peak latency of SNAP was 4.11±0.30 ms and mean amplitude of SNAP was 4.16±1.49 µV. The findings of this study may also prove useful for IPBSN conduction study.