3. Rampton S, Tea C, Miesi K, Hamilton C. PG30 How to do a remote OSCE successfully: converting face to face simulation into a virtual E-consult in the pandemic crisis. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020; 6(Suppl_1):A45–A46.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.78.

4. Taylor S, Haywood M, Shulruf B. Comparison of effect between simulated patient clinical skill training and student role play on objective structured clinical examination performance outcomes for medical students in Australia. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019; 16:3.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.3.

5. Nagoshi Y, Cooper LA, Meyer L, Cherabuddi K, Close J, Dow J, Markham MJ, Stalvey C. Application of an objective structured clinical examination to evaluate and monitor intern’s proficiency of hand hygiene and personal protective equipment use in the United States. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019; 16:31.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.31.

6. Ilgen JS, Ma IW, Hatala R, Cook DA. A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med Educ. 2015; 49:161–173.
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12621.

8. Elnaem MH, Akkawi ME, Nazar NI, Ab Rahman NS, Mohamed MH. Malaysian pharmacy students’ perspectives on the virtual objective structured clinical examination during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021; 18:6.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.6.

9. Khamisa K, Halman S, Desjardins I, Jean MS, Pugh D. The implementation and evaluation of an e-Learning training module for objective structured clinical examination raters in Canada. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018; 15:18.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.18.

10. Felthun JZ, Taylor S, Shulruf B, Allen DW. Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021; 18:11.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.11.

11. Shulruf B, Damodaran A, Jones P, Kennedy S, Mangos G, O’Sullivan AJ, Rhee J, Taylor S, Velan G, Harris P. Enhancing the defensibility of examiners’ marks in high stake OSCEs. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18:10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1112-z.

12. Klein Nulend R, Harris P, Shulruf B. Predictive validity of a tool to resolve borderline grades in OSCEs. GMS J Med Educ. 2020; 37:Doc31.
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001324.

14. Ellis PD. The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2010.
16. Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013; 35:e1437–e1446.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634.

17. Chong L, Taylor S, Haywood M, Adelstein BA, Shulruf B. Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018; 15:17.
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.17.

20. Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Tejasvi T, Kvedar JC, Gates M. The empirical foundations of teledermatology: a review of the research evidence. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21:953–979.
https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0146.

22. Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M, Masoomi R, Shirazi M, Nedjat S, Norcini J. The utility of mini-clinical evaluation exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: a BEME review: BEME guide no. 59. Med Teach. 2020; 42:125–142.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652732.
