Two of the six dental colleges in Bhopal were randomly selected, and the questionnaire was distributed to the available dental faculty members. Direct interview was used to explain the questionnaire and answer any questions relating to it. Of a total of 62 dental faculty members, 50 participated in the study. Simple percentages of the various responses were used for analysis

Table 1 presents the distribution of responses to this questionnaire. Of the 50 respondents, 16 (32%) strongly agreed that EBP is a process of making decisions based on scientifically proven evidence. Fourteen faculty members (28.0%) strongly agreed with the item stating that EBD involves a series of steps including identifying the clinical question, finding the answer/evidence, assessing the validity of the evidence, and ultimately applying it if clinically suitable. Sixteen faculty members (32.0%) strongly agreed with the item stating that EBD benefits patients by improving the quality and effectiveness of clinical treatments. However, 30 respondents (60.0%) had the incorrect impression that all evidence from articles published in scientific journals can be used in EBD. Twenty-five respondents (50.0%) agreed or strongly agreed with the item stating that the best and quickest way to find evidence is by reading textbooks or asking experienced colleagues.

Only some faculty members (32.0%) were able to clearly identify that EBD is a process of making decisions based on scientifically proven evidence, which strongly contrasts with the results of studies conducted among Iranian [2] and Malaysian dentists [1], of whom 82.0% and 94.2%, respectively, correctly responded to this item. This finding indicates that Indian dentists are unable to define EBD and show a fundamental deficit in essential modern clinical skills that are sought after by knowledgeable patients and technologically savvy dental students, who hope to identify clinicians with the best practices and the most up-to-date clinical decision-making. In other questionnaire items, Malaysian [1] and Iranian [2] dentists were also found to have more knowledge about EBD than the Indian dentists surveyed in this study. This finding shows that the dental faculty members of Bhopal have not been exposed to important aspects of EBD. Half of the respondents had the incorrect impression that evidence from all articles published in scientific journals can be used in evidence-based practice. This reveals their failure to recognize the strengths, weaknesses, and types of available evidence. Ideally, clinicians should consult electronic databases, such as PubMed and Cochrane, and seek evidence from systematic reviews or meta-analyses of randomized control trials when possible, in order to identify the best current evidence that can help guide decision-making [3]. The results of the present study are comparable to those of a study of dental faculty members in Nigeria, who had little information about the principles of EBD, although they were aware of it in general [4]. The use of self-reported data containing a variety of potential sources of bias should be noted as a limitation of this preliminary survey.

The major benefits of evidence-based practice are as follows: students and the entire dental team are informed about the latest available treatments, treatment decisions are easier to justify to the students, and the entire dental team provides the best available treatment to patients. EBD is a relatively new paradigm in Indian dentistry and therefore may not be a familiar concept for every dentist. According to the above results, EBD educational programs should be developed for dental practitioners in India in order to enhance their knowledge and skills. Follow-up studies may focus more on EBD-related behaviours, attitudes, and practices that could improve the current state of knowledge, along with potential barriers to doing so. In conclusion, the above results offer important directions for improving EBD in Indian dental colleges and improving and modernising dental education overall.