Journal List > Investig Clin Urol > v.57(5) > 1088080

TOOLS
Lee, Kim, Ko, Kim, Kim, Chung, Kim, Jung, Yoon, and Oh: Corrigendum: Correction of the unit for stone size in the ABSTRACT and RESULTS section. The Gachon University Ureteral Narrowing score: A comprehensive standardized system for predicting necessity of ureteral dilatation to treat proximal ureteral calculi
Corrigendum

Investigative and Clinical Urology 2016; 57(5): 372.

Published online: 7 September 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.372

Corrigendum: Correction of the unit for stone size in the ABSTRACT and RESULTS section. The Gachon University Ureteral Narrowing score: A comprehensive standardized system for predicting necessity of ureteral dilatation to treat proximal ureteral calculi

Seung Kyu Lee, Tae Beom Kim, Kwang-Pil Ko, Chang Hee Kim, Kwang Taek Kim, Kyung Jin Chung, Khae Hawn Kim, Han Jung, Sang Jin Yoon, Jin Kyu Oh

© The Korean Urological Association, 2016

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Investig Clin Urol 2016;57:280-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.280
In the ABSTRACT and RESULTS section of this paper, the unit for stone size was incorrectly printed as cm. The authors sincerely regret this error. The unit for stone size should be corrected to mm as follows:
Corrected unit for stone size in the ABSTRACT and RESULTS section
ABSTRACT
Results: Mean patients' age and their stone size were 48.53±12.90 years and 7.79±2.57 mm, respectively. Significantly smaller stone size (p=0.009), lower stone density (p=0.005), and lower ureteral density differences between ureteral narrowing level and far distal ureter (UD) (p<0.001) were observed in group 1 (n=34) than in group 2 (n=49).
RESULTS
Mean stone size and BMI were 7.70 (±2.49) mm and 25.37 (±3.48) kg/m2, respectively.
TOOLS
Similar articles