Journal List > J Nutr Health > v.48(5) > 1081410

J Nutr Health. 2015 Oct;48(5):407-418. Korean.
Published online October 30, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2015.48.5.407
© 2015 The Korean Nutrition Society
Development of dietary behavior items available in Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
A-Hyun Lim,1 Suk-Young Choi,1 Jae-Eun Shim,2 Ji-Yun Hwang,3 Hyun-Kyung Moon,1 and Kirang Kim1
1Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Chungnam 31116, Korea.
2Department of Food and Nutrition, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea.
3Nutrition Education Major, Graduate School of Education, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: kirangkim@dankook.ac.kr
Received September 15, 2015; Revised October 01, 2015; Accepted October 01, 2015.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Purpose

Given that the indicators related to chronic diseases are important to evaluating goals of the national health policy, the aim of this study was to develop dietary behavior items available in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Methods

The dietary behavior items were developed based on the literature reviews, need assessment of the field, expert focus-group interviews, and expert advisory meeting. Questions for each dietary behavior item were developed by reflecting on environmental, personal, and behavior factors of the ecological frame and then revised through expert focus-group interview and expert advisory meeting. The understanding and reliability of the developed questionnaire were assessed by cognitive interview and test-retest reliability.

Results

The developed items were sodium and salt intake, added and simple sugar intake, enough time to consume a meal for all ages, caffeine drinks and fresh/healthy food intake for children and adolescents, and limited dietary intake, fresh/healthy food intake for seniors. In most questions except some questions on sodium and salt intake, subjects understood over 70% and consistency of responses based on the kappa values was acceptable.

Conclusion

Developed dietary behavior items are expected to be useful for evidence-based nutrition policy, interventions and research targeting dietary patterns through investigating and monitoring dietary behavior patterns.

Keywords: dietary behavior; food behavior survey; eating behavior survey; Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Figures


Fig. 1
The development procedure of dietary behavior questionnaire.
Click for larger image

Tables


Table 1
General characteristics of participants in the cognitive interview
Click for larger image


Table 2
Candidates of survey items that are not included in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey based on the literature review
Click for larger image


Table 3
Result of need assessment of dietary behavior items for Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Click for larger image


Table 4
The number of questions for dietary behavior items developed by social cognitive theory
Click for larger image


Table 5
Reliability of dietary behavior questionnaires for all subjects
Click for larger image


Table 6
Reliability of dietary behavior questionnaire for children and elders
Click for larger image


Table 7
Dietary behavior questionnaire for all subjects
Click for larger image


Table 8
Dietary behavior questionnaire for children
Click for larger image


Table 9
Dietary behavior questionnaire for elders
Click for larger image

Notes

This research was supported by a fund by Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014-E3500600).

References
1. Kim HR. Nutrition transition and shifting diet linked non-communicable diseases and policy issues. Health Welf Policy Forum 2013;198:27–37.
2. Shim JE, Kim JH, Nam GY, Paik HY, Moon HK, Kim YO. Comparative analysis and evaluation of dietary intakes of Koreans by age groups: (3) Risk factors for chromic degenerative diseases. Korean J Nutr 2002;35(1):78–89.
3. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76(6):1261–1271.
4. Kim MK, Kim K, Kim CI, Oh K, Oh YJ, Choi BY. The current status and the perspectives of nutrition survey. Korean J Epidemiol 2007;29(2):111–128.
5. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2003;916:i–viii. 1–149.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). National health and nutrition examination survey 2011-12 [Internet]. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). 2012 behavioral risk factor surveillance system questionnaire [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
8. Department of Health (GB). Diet and nutrition survey of infants and young children, 2011 [Internet]. London: Department of Health; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
9. Department of Health (GB). National diet and nutrition survey:headline results from years 1 and 2 (combined) of the rolling programme 2008-9 - 2009-10 [Internet]. London: Department of Health; 2011 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
10. Statistics Canada. Canadian community health survey (CCHS) cycle 2.2 nutrition: Questionnaire [Internet]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2005 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
11. National Institute of Health and Nutrition (JP). National health and nutrition survey Japan, 2004 [Internet]. Tokyo: National Institute of Health and Nutrition; 2004 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
12. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian health survey 2011-13 (AHS) [Internet]. Sydney: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012 [cited 2014 Jan 5].
13. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013 community health survey [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
14. Ministry of Education; Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean youth risk behavior online survey [Internet] (The 9th). Seoul: Ministry of Education; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
Available from: http://yhs.cdc.go.kr/.
15. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES) [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
16. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2013 consumer behavior survey for food [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
17. Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-OzzzBrien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29(1):253–272.
18. Park YS, Lee JW, Seo JS, Lee BK, Lee HS, Lee SK. In: Nutrition education & counseling. 5th revision. Paju: Kyomunsa; 2013.
19. Baranowski T, Perry CL, Parcel GS. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: social cognitive theory. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edition. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1997. pp. 153-178.
20. Booth SL, Sallis JF, Ritenbaugh C, Hill JO, Birch LL, Frank LD, Glanz K, Himmelgreen DA, Mudd M, Popkin BM, Rickard KA, St Jeor S, Hays NP. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutr Rev 2001;59(3 Pt 2):S21–S39.
21. Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot 2005;19(5):330–333.
22. Willis GB. In: Cognitive interviewing - a "how to" guide. Research Triangle Park (NC): Research Triangle Institute; 1999.
23. Fowler FJ. Getting beyond pretesting and cognitive interviews: the case for more experimental pilot studies. In: Presser S, Rothged JM, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, editors. Questionnaire Development Evaluation and Testing Methods. New York (NY): John Wiley; 2004. pp. 109-130.
24. Madans J, Miller K, Maitland A, Willis G. In: Question evaluation methods: contributing to the science of data quality. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
25. Jobe JB, Mingay DJ. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health 1989;79(8):1053–1055.
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174.
27. Brug J. Determinants of healthy eating: motivation, abilities and environmental opportunities. Fam Pract 2008;25 Suppl 1:i50–i55.
28. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999;29(6 Pt 1):563–570.
29. Washington State Department of Health (US). Nutrition & physical activity plan: policy & environmental approach. Olympia(WA): Washington State Department of Health; 2008.
30. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statistics 2012: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-3) [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013 [cited 2014 Aug 13].
31. Kim HJ, Paik HY, Lee SY, Shim JE, Kim YS. Salt usage behaviors are related to urinary sodium excretion in normotensive Korean adults. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007;16(1):122–128.
32. Ahn SH, Kwon JS, Kim K, Yoon JS, Kang BW, Kim JW, Heo S, Cho HY, Kim HK. Study on the eating habits and practicability of guidelines for reducing sodium intake according to the stage of change in housewives. Korean J Community Nutr 2012;17(6):724–736.
33. Bjelland M, Lien N, Grydeland M, Bergh IH, Anderssen SA, Ommundsen Y, Klepp KI, Andersen LF. Intakes and perceived home availability of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit and vegetables as reported by mothers, fathers and adolescents in the HEIA (HEalth In Adolescents) study. Public Health Nutr 2011;14(12):2156–2165.
34. Hedrick VE, Savla J, Comber DL, Flack KD, Estabrooks PA, Nsiah-Kumi PA, Ortmeier S, Davy BM. Development of a brief questionnaire to assess habitual beverage intake (BEVQ-15): sugar-sweetened beverages and total beverage energy intake. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112(6):840–849.
35. Park S, Sherry B, Foti K, Blanck HM. Self-reported academic grades and other correlates of sugar-sweetened soda intake among US adolescents. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112(1):125–131.
36. Davis JN, Whaley SE, Goran MI. Effects of breastfeeding and low sugar-sweetened beverage intake on obesity prevalence in Hispanic toddlers. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95(1):3–8.
37. Sinn DH, Shin DH, Lim SW, Kim KM, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Rhee PL. The speed of eating and functional dyspepsia in young women. Gut Liver 2010;4(2):173–178.
38. Thivel D, Aucouturier J, Isacco L, Lazaar N, Ratel S, Doré E, Meyer M, Duché P. Are eating habits associated with physical fitness in primary school children? Eat Behav 2013;14(1):83–86.
39. Wolfe WS, Olson CM, Kendall A, Frongillo EA Jr. Understanding food insecurity in the elderly: a conceptual framework. J Nutr Educ 1996;28(2):92–100.
40. Suh Y, Seok YH, Chung YJ. Relationship of dietary self-efficacy and illness beliefs, perceived benefits and perceived barriers for the reduction of sodium intake in the elderly. Korean J Nutr 2012;45(4):324–335.