Journal List > J Nutr Health > v.47(4) > 1081344

Park, Suh, and Chung: Comparison of chronic disease risk by dietary carbohydrate energy ratio in Korean elderly: Using the 2007–2009 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Abstract

Purpose

It is reported that most senior people consume a high carbohydrate diet, while a high carbohydrate diet could contribute to the risk of chronic disease. The aim of this study is to determine whether a high carbohydrate diet can increase the risk of chronic disease in elderly Koreans. Methods: Using the 2007–2009 Korean National Health Nutrition Examination Survey data, out of a total of 3,917 individuals aged 65 and above, final 1,535 subjects were analyzed, divided by dietary carbohydrate energy ratio into two groups of moderate carbohydrate ratio (MCR, 55–70%) and excessive carbohydrate ratio (ECR, > 70%). All data were processed after the application of weighted value, using a general linear model or logistic regression. Results: Eighty one percent of elderly Koreans consumed diets with carbohydrate energy ratio above 70%. The ECR group included more female subjects, rural residents, lower income, and lower education level. The ECR group showed lower waist circumference, lower diastolic blood pressure, and lower frequency of consumption of meat and egg, milk, and alcohol. The intake of energy and most nutrients, with the exception of fiber, potassium, vitamin A, and carotene, was lower in the ECR group compared to the MCR group. When analyzed by gender, the ECR group showed lower risk of dyslipidemia in male and obesity in female subjects, even though the ECR group showed low intake of some nutrients. No difference in the risk of hypertension, diabetes, and anemia was observed between the two groups in male or female subjects. Conclusion: This result suggested that a high carbohydrate diet would not be a cause to increase the risk of chronic disease in the elderly. Further study is needed in order to determine an appropriate carbohydrate energy ratio for elderly Koreans to reduce the risk of chronic disease.

References

1. Statistics Korea. Population and proportion by age groups. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2011.
2. Shim JE, Paik HY, Lee SY, Moon HK, Kim YO. Comparative analysis and evaluation of dietary intake of Koreans by age groups: (4) the Korean diet quality index. Korean J Nutr. 2002; 35(5):558–570.
3. Song YJ, Joung HJ, Paik HY. Socioeconomic, nutrient, and health risk factors associated with dietary patterns in adult populations from 2001 Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey. Korean J Nutr. 2005; 38(3):219–225.
4. Lee MS, Woo MK. A study on health-related habits, dietary behaviors and health status of the middle aged and the elderly living in Chonju area. Korean J Nutr. 2000; 33(3):343–352.
5. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. A study on the general property and environmental conditions of elderly. In: A survey on the living status of elderly 2011. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2012. p. 97–110.
6. Kim MW, Han HK, Choi SS, Lee SD. A study on dietary pattern and nutritional status of the long-lived elderly people by food habit index in Ganghwa-gun area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005; 10(6):892–904.
8. Moon HK, Kong JE. Assessment of nutrient intake for middle aged with and without metabolic syndrome using 2005 and 2007 Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey. Korean J Nutr. 2010; 43(1):69–78.
crossref
9. Kim EK, Lee JS, Hong H, Yu CH. Association between glycemic index, glycemic load, dietary carbohydrates and diabetes from Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005. Korean J Nutr. 2009; 42(7):622–630.
crossref
10. Coulston AM, Hollenbeck CB, Swislocki AL, Chen YD, Reaven GM. Deleterious metabolic effects of high-carbohydrate, sucrose-containing diets in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1987; 82(2):213–220.
crossref
11. Oh KW, Nam CM, Kim CI, Lee-Kim YC. The effects of dietary carbohydrate on serum triglyceride concentrations in Korea. Korean J Nutr. 2004; 37(6):448–454.
12. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Income classification criteria 2007–2008. In: Korea Health Statistics 2008: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV-2). Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2009. p. 504.
13. Kim EI, Suh YW, Jung SH, Kim EY, Kim HY, Park MS, Yu KD, Kim KI, Kim CH. Clinical significance of anemia in frail elderly patients admitted to the acute elderly care unit. Korean J Med. 2007; 72(1):44–51.
14. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994; 32:1–407.
15. Lee HS, Kwon IS, Kwon CS. Nutritional risks analysis based on the food intake frequency and health-related behaviors of the older residents (50 years and over) in Andong area (1). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2008; 37(8):998–1008.
crossref
16. Han HK, Choi SS, Kim MW, Lee SD. Food habits and nutritional status of the long-lived elderly people in Ganghwa-gun area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005; 10(1):101–110.
17. Kim OS, Ryu HS. The study on blood lipid levels according to the food habits and food intake patterns in Korean elderly. Korean J Food Nutr. 2009; 22(3):421–429.
18. Kim Y. Food and nutrient consumption patterns of Korean adults by socioeconomic status. Korean J Community Nutr. 2001; 6(4):645–656.
19. Fraser GE, Welch A, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE. The effect of age, sex, and education on food consumption of a middle-aged English cohort-EPIC in East Anglia. Prev Med. 2000; 30(1):26–34.
crossref
20. Chung HK, Yang EJ, Song WO. Carbohydrate intake associated with risk factors of coronary heart disease in the adults: NHANES III. Korean J Nutr. 2000; 33(8):873–881.
21. Lee HS, Kwon CS. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and related risk factors of elderly residents in Andong rural area 2. Based on the biochemical measurements and nutrient intakes. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2010; 39(10):1459–1466.
crossref
22. Merchant AT, Anand SS, Kelemen LE, Vuksan V, Jacobs R, Davis B, Teo K, Yusuf S. SHARE and SHARE-AP Investigators. Carbohydrate intake and HDL in a multiethnic population. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85(1):225–230.
23. Jeppesen J, Schaaf P, Jones C, Zhou MY, Chen YD, Reaven GM. Effects of low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets on risk factors for ischemic heart disease in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 65(4):1027–1033.
crossref
24. Lee L. Associations between dietary intake and health status in Korean elderly population. Korean J Nutr. 2002; 35(1):124–136.

Table 1.
General characteristics and distribution of energy intake by dietary carbohydrate energy ratio in total subjects
Variable Dietary carbohydrate energy ratio χ2-value 2)
MCR 1) ECR
Sex Men
Women
149 (52.3) 3)
136 (47.7)
527 (42.2)
723 (57.8)
7.12
Age (yrs) 65–74
75–84
≥ 85
213 (74.7)
59 (20.7)
13 (04.6)
861 (68.9)
344 (27.5)
45 (03.6)
1.84
Residential area Urban
Rural
169 (59.3)
116 (40.7)
564 (45.1)
686 (54.9)
15.70∗∗
Income Low
Middle low
Middle high
High
54 (19.7)
62 (22.6)
73 (26.6)
85 (31.0)
365 (30.5)
320 (26.7)
265 (22.1)
247 (20.6)
18.25
Education level Primary school
Middle school
High school
College
173 (61.3)
43 (15.2)
39 (13.8)
27 (09.6)
991 (80.4)
116 (09.4)
86 (07.0)
39 (03.2)
65.79∗∗∗
Energy intake <EER 4)
≥EER
Total
191 (27.7)
91 (32.3)
285 (18.6)
945 (76.0)
299 (24.0)
250 (81.4)
14.57∗∗

1) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR: Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

2) Calculated by Complex Samples χ2-test

3) n (%)

4) Estimated Energy Requirements

: p < 0.05,

∗∗ : p < 0.01,

∗∗∗ : p < 0.001

Table 2.
Anthropometric, blood pressure and blood biochemical indices by carbohydrate energy ratio in total subjects 1)
Variable Dietary carbohydrate energy ratio F-value 3)
n MCR 2) n ECR
Anthropometric
Height 282 158.04 ± 0.714) 1,244 155.65 ± 0.35 0.40
Weight 282 058.68 ± 0.69 1,245 55.39 ± 0.36 6.32
Body mass index (kg/m2) 282 023.44 ± 0.20 1,244 22.82 ± 0.11 2.83
Waist circumference (cm) 283 083.35 ± 0.69 1,241 81.20 ± 0.34 5.87
Blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 285 128.13 ± 1.44 1,250 127.72 ± 0.83 0.31
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 285 079.14 ± 0.74 1,250 76.46 ± 0.46 5.53
Blood biochemical indices
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 274 199.14 ± 3.34 1,174 194.24 ± 1.35 2.84
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 274 133.55 ± 7.05 1,174 137.92 ± 3.21 0.07
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 274 048.64 ± 0.96 1,174 46.72 ± 0.53 1.46
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 272 013.82 ± 0.13 1,162 13.60 ± 0.05 0.14
Hematocrit (%) 272 041.22 ± 0.38 1,162 40.59 ± 0.15 0.25
Serum ferritin (ng/ml) 273 104.57 ± 7.15 1,177 100.76 ± 6.35 0.02
Glu-FBS (mg/dl) 273 096.20 ± 1.04 1,174 96.42 ± 0.61 0.07
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl) 274 016.64 ± 0.41 1,177 16.03 ± 0.17 2.67

1) Adjusted for sex, residential area, income, and education level

2) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

3) Calculated by Complex Samples General Linear Model ANOVA

4) Mean ± SE

: p < 0.05

Table 3.
Daily food group consumption frequency by carbohydrate energy ratio in total and male and female subjects 1)
Food group Total Male Female
MCR 2)
(n = 285)
ECR
(n = 1,250)
F-value 3) MCR
(n = 149)
ECR
(n = 527)
F-value MCR
(n = 136)
ECR
(n = 723)
F-value
Total grain 5.07 ± 0.10 4) 4.93 ± 0.06 0.01 4.94 ± 0.14 4.96 ± 0.09 0.92 5.21 ± 0.15 4.91 ± 0.07 0.57
Staples 4.77 ± 0.11 4.72 ± 0.06 0.34 4.66 ± 0.14 4.70 ± 0.09 0.72 4.88 ± 0.16 4.74 ± 0.07 0.03
Snacks 0.30 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.01 3.25 0.27 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.02 0.37 0.33 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.01 8.16∗∗
Potatoes 0.21 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 4.35 0.20 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.02 3.64 0.21 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.01 1.40
Beans 1.63 ± 0.10 1.43 ± 0.05 1.38 1.60 ± 0.13 1.39 ± 0.07 0.20 1.66 ± 0.14 1.46 ± 0.07 0.85
Meats and eggs s 0.58 ± 0.03 0.39 ± 0.02 9.62∗∗ 0.63 ± 0.04 0.47 ± 0.03 4.63 0.52 ± 0.06 0.33 ± 0.02 4.66
Fishes 0.79 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.03 0.35 0.84 ± 0.06 0.72 ± 0.05 0.08 0.74 ± 0.06 0.59 ± 0.03 1.30
Salted fishes 0.14 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.01 1.36 0.17 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.02 0.48 0.11 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.01 0.88
Total vegetables s 4.99 ± 0.14 4.54 ± 0.09 0.62 5.04 ± 0.20 4.86 ± 0.12 0.38 4.94 ± 0.18 4.30 ± 0.11 2.82
Green and yellow 1.21 ± 0.08 1.01 ± 0.03 1.17 1.24 ± 0.08 1.06 ± 0.05 0.49 1.18 ± 0.14 0.98 ± 0.04 0.48
White 3.12 ± 0.10 3.02 ± 0.07 0.08 3.16 ± 0.13 3.25 ± 0.09 1.55 3.08 ± 0.14 2.86 ± 0.09 0.50
Mushrooms 0.14 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.73 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 2.67 0.14 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.01 0.22
Seaweeds 0.51 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.02 3.81 0.50 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.02 0.12 0.53 ± 0.06 0.36 ± 0.02 5.77
Fruits 1.20 ± 0.15 0.83 ± 0.03 1.52 0.97 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.05 0.50 1.46 ± 0.29 0.83 ± 0.04 2.42
Milk products 0.42 ± 0.04 0.24 ± 0.02 8.73∗∗ 0.38 ± 0.04 0.25 ± 0.02 2.28 0.46 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.02 8.89∗∗
Drinks 1.24 ± 0.07 1.16 ± 0.04 0.45 1.52 ± 0.10 1.40 ± 0.06 0.002 0.94 ± 0.11 0.99 ± 0.05 0.85
Alcohols 0.31 ± 0.04 0.20 ± 0.02 4.11 0.49 ± 0.06 0.37 ± 0.03 3.09 0.12 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.01 1.61
Fast food 0.04 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 2.81 0.04 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 2.05 0.03 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.00 0.81

1) Adjusted for sex, residential area, income, and education level in total subjects, and adjusted for the same variables except sex in male and female subjects

2) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR: Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

3) Calculated by Complex Samples General Linear Model ANOVA

4) Mean ± SE

: p < 0.05,

∗∗ : p < 0.01

Table 4.
Daily nutrients intake and macronutrient energy ratio by carbohydrate energy ratio in total and male and female subjects 1)
Nutrients Total Male Female
MCR 2)
(n = 285)
ECR
(n = 1,250)
F-value 3) MCR
(n = 149)
ECR
(n = 527)
F-value MCR
(n = 136)
ECR
(n = 723)
F-value
Energy (kcal)4) 1,722 ± 39 5) 1,492 ± 22 11.98∗∗ 1,836 ± 47 1,645 ± 30 6.66 1,601 ± 57 1,375 ± 28 4.91
Protein (g) 69.2 ± 1.88 43.7 ± 0.69 228.93∗∗∗ 74.1 ± 2.37 50.0 ± 1.02 137.77∗∗∗ 62.9 ± 2.56 38.9 ± 0.79 105.55∗∗∗
Fat (g) 36.5 ± 1.07 14.2 ± 0.35 587.45∗∗∗ 39.1 ± 1.36 16.6 ± 0.59 319.63∗∗∗ 33.7 ± 1.60 12.4 ± 0.36 272.03∗∗∗
Fiber (g) 7.36 ± 0.38 6.22 ± 0.17 0.45 7.86 ± 0.52 6.71 ± 0.22 0.076 6.83 ± 0.49 5.84 ± 0.24 0.62
Calcium (mg) 530 ± 28.9 342 ± 8.94 30.79∗∗∗ 540 ± 30.7 397 ± 16.2 9.67∗∗ 520 ± 43.1 301 ± 9.66 28.26∗∗∗
Phosphorus (mg) 1,147 ± 34.2 858 ± 13.1 66.48∗∗∗ 1,221 ± 37.0 972 ± 20.2 34.17∗∗∗ 1,069 ± 51.0 772 ± 15.3 36.48∗∗∗
Iron (mg) 14.9 ± 0.78 11.1 ± 0.42 3.95 14.8 ± 0.83 12.4 ± 0.58 0.54∗∗ 15.0 ± 1.30 10.2 ± 0.55 5.71
Sodium (mg) 4,977 ± 235 3,579 ± 99 15.88∗∗∗ 5,587 ± 235 4,205 ± 147 12.08∗∗ 4,328 ± 332 3,104 ± 116 6.93
Potassium (mg) 2,819 ± 102. 2,282 ± 50.7 2.60 3,080 ± 128 2,508 ± 67.1 2.62 2,543 ± 129 2,110 ± 67.3 0.84
Vitamin A (μgRE) 727 ± 44.5 535 ± 36.3 0.07 790 ± 57.4 549 ± 35.6 1.40 660 ± 66.5 524 ± 52.9 0.20
Retinol (μg) 76.7 ± 6.63 25.3 ± 2.28 33.04∗∗∗ 73.8 ± 8.51 32.1 ± 4.09 6.76 79.8 ± 9.03 20.2 ± 2.15 35.35∗∗∗
β-carotene (μg) 3,777 ± 253 3,039 ± 217 0.42 4,115 ± 313 3,078 ± 210 0.29 3,418 ± 397 3,009 ± 316 1.24
Thiamin (mg) 1.22 ± 0.05 0.83 ± 0.02 46.17∗∗∗ 1.34 ± 0.07 0.93 ± 0.02 22.90∗∗∗ 1.08 ± 0.06 0.76 ± 0.02 30.14∗∗∗
Riboflavin (mg) 1.11 ± 0.04 0.67 ± 0.02 77.61∗∗∗ 1.18 ± 0.05 0.75 ± 0.02 46.56∗∗∗ 1.03 ± 0.06 0.60 ± 0.02 44.95∗∗∗
Niacin (mg) 15.9 ± 0.53 10.5 ± 0.17 80.04∗∗∗ 17.5 ± 0.70 11.9 ± 0.24 62.09∗∗∗ 14.1 ± 0.65 9.42 ± 0.20 31.08∗∗∗
Vitamin C (mg) 86.6 ± 4.87 79.9 ± 3.0 4.95 93.2 ± 7.04 87.4 ± 4.61 3.136 79.5 ± 6.35 74.3 ± 3.75 2.03
Water (g) 865 ± 40.2 591 ± 15.3 13.09∗∗∗ 966 ± 55.6 693 ± 22.9 6.87∗∗ 758 ± 52.7 514 ± 18.1 7.00∗∗
Carbohydrate (%) 64.88 ± 0.31 79.87 ± 0.19 522.78∗∗∗ 64.58 ± 0.44 79.12 ± 0.27 644.54∗∗∗ 65.20 ± 0.41 80.45 ± 0.26 939.08∗∗∗
Protein (%) 16.18 ± 0.25 11.66 ± 0.08 266.62∗∗∗ 16.36 ± 0.30 12.06 ± 0.13 165.04∗∗∗ 15.98 ± 0.39 11.36 ± 0.10 109.82∗∗∗
Fat (%) 18.94 ± 0.31 8.46 ± 0.15 771.09∗∗∗ 19.06 ± 0.42 8.81 ± 0.21 409.80∗∗∗ 18.82 ± 0.42 8.19 ± 0.20 155.30∗∗∗

1) Adjusted for sex, residential area, income, and education level in total subjects, and adjusted for the same variables except sex in male and female subjects

2) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR: Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

3) Calculated by Complex Samples General Linear Model ANOVA

4) Adjusted not for energy intake

5) Mean ± SE

: p < 0.05,

∗∗ : p < 0.01,

∗∗∗ : p < 0.001

Table 5.
Nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) and mean adequacy ratio (MAR) by carbohydrate energy ratio in total and male and female subjects 1)
NAR Total F-value 3) Male F-value Female F-value
MCR 2)
(n = 285)
ECR
(n = 1,250)
MCR
(n = 149)
ECR
(n = 527)
MCR
(n = 136)
ECR
(n = 723)
Protein 0.96 ± 0.01 4) 0.81 ± 0.01 117.95∗∗∗ 0.98 ± 0.01 0.85 ± 0.01 80.04∗∗∗ 0.94 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.01 34.24∗∗∗
Calcium 0.65 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.01 61.02∗∗∗ 0.69 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.02 29.23∗∗∗ 0.60 ± 0.04 0.41 ± 0.01 45.01∗∗∗
Phosphorus 0.98 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.00 19.88∗∗∗ 0.99 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0.02 22.12∗∗∗ 0.96 ± 0.02 0.89 ± 0.01 5.04
Iron 0.94 ± 0.01 0.81 ± 0.01 49.22∗∗∗ 0.96 ± 0.01 0.83 ± 0.01 38.39∗∗∗ 0.92 ± 0.02 0.80 ± 0.01 15.96∗∗∗
Vitamin A 0.72 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.01 26.25∗∗∗ 0.76 ± 0.03 0.53 ± 0.02 37.04∗∗∗ 0.67 ± 0.04 0.53 ± 0.02 4.28
Thiamin 0.83 ± 0.02 0.67 ± 0.01 71.65∗∗∗ 0.87 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.01 49.75∗∗∗ 0.80 ± 0.03 0.64 ± 0.01 21.46∗∗∗
Riboflavin 0.74 ± 0.02 0.48 ± 0.01 138.49∗∗∗ 0.72 ± 0.02 0.49 ± 0.01 61.88∗∗∗ 0.73 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.01 48.44∗∗∗
Niacin 0.86 ± 0.02 0.67 ± 0.01 70.55∗∗∗ 0.89 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.01 67.03∗∗∗ 0.83 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.01 19.36∗∗∗
Vitamin C 0.67 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.01 1.66 0.71 ± 0.03 0.64 ± 0.02 2.51∗∗∗ 0.62 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.02 0.71
MAR 0.82 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.01 98.92∗∗∗ 0.84 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.01 82.56∗∗∗ 0.79 ± 0.02 0.64 ± 0.01 27.79∗∗∗

1) Adjusted for sex, residential area, income, and education level in total subjects, and adjusted for the same variables except sex in male and female subjects

2) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR: Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

3) Calculated by Complex Samples General Linear Model ANOVA

4) Mean ± SE

: p < 0.05,

∗∗∗ : p < 0.001

Table 6.
Index of nutrient quality (INQ) by carbohydrate energy ratio in total and male and female subjects 1)
INQ Total F-value 3) Male F-value Female F-value
MCR 2)
(n = 285)
ECR
(n = 1,250)
MCR
(n = 149)
ECR
(n = 527)
MCR
(n = 136)
ECR
(n = 723)
Protein 1.53 ± 0.03 4) 1.09 ± 0.01 274.71∗∗∗ 1.64 ± 0.03 1.21 ± 0.01 165.17∗∗∗ 1.42 ± 0.04 1.01 ± 0.01 111.64∗∗∗
Calcium 0.81 ± 0.04 0.59 ± 0.01 28.92∗∗∗ 0.85 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.03 7.89∗∗ 0.77 ± 0.06 0.51 ± 0.01 26.49∗∗∗
Phosphorus 1.73 ± 0.04 1.46 ± 0.01 65.16∗∗∗ 1.92 ± 0.03 1.69 ± 0.02 33.46∗∗∗ 1.53 ± 0.05 1.29 ± 0.01 31.79∗∗∗
Iron 1.85 ± 0.09 1.53 ± 0.05 6.48 1.80 ± 0.09 1.65 ± 0.08 1.29 1.90 ± 0.16 1.45 ± 0.06 7.90∗∗
Vitamin A 1.17 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.05 3.99 1.26 ± 0.10 0.91 ± 0.05 4.27 1.07 ± 0.10 0.93 ± 0.07 0.51
Thiamin 1.09 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.01 53.57∗∗∗ 1.21 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.02 32.57∗∗∗ 0.97 ± 0.04 0.81 ± 0.01 26.83∗∗∗
Riboflavin 0.86 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.01 109.27∗∗∗ 0.87 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.01 57.28∗∗∗ 0.86 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.01 61.83∗∗∗
Niacin 1.11 ± 0.03 0.84 ± 0.01 79.66∗∗∗ 1.20 ± 0.03 0.91 ± 0.01 71.67∗∗∗ 1.10 ± 0.04 0.78 ± 0.01 26.88∗∗∗
Vitamin C 0.90 ± 0.05 0.92 ± 0.03 2.12 1.02 ± 0.07 1.03 ± 0.05 1.28 0.76 ± 0.05 0.84 ± 0.04 1.07

1) Adjusted for sex, residential area, income, and education level in total subjects, and adjusted for the same variables except sex in male and female subjects

2) MCR: Moderate carbohydrate energy ratio group, ECR: Excessive carbohydrate energy ratio group

3) Calculated by Complex Samples General Linear Model ANOVA

4) Mean ± SE

: p < 0.05,

∗∗ : p < 0.01,

∗∗∗ : p < 0.001

TOOLS
Similar articles