Journal List > J Nutr Health > v.46(6) > 1081322

Lee, You, and Chang: Dietary habits score, nutrients intake and dietary quality related to coffee consumption of college students in Incheon*

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the food habits score, nutrients intake and dietary quality with regard to coffee consumption of college students in Incheon. The data were collected with a self-reports questionnaire with a total of 190 subjects, comprised with 101 male and 89 female college students. We classified these subjects into three groups using percentile of coffee intake to assess the nutrients intake and dietary quality. The correlations among coffee intake, food habits score, nutrients intake and dietary quality were evaluated. The average coffee intake of male and female college students were 156.8 mL and 157.4 mL, respectively. The coffee preferences with respect to specialty coffee were caramel macchiato, cafe latte, americano, cafe mocha, and cappucino in male college students, and caramel macchiato, ameri-cano, cafe mocha, cafe latte, and cappucino in female college students, in preference order. The coffee intake motivation score of the high 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake was higher than that of the low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake in emotion motivation and utilitarian motivation. The highest scores were ‘flavor and aroma’ in emotion motivation, and ‘prevention of sleepness’ in utilitarian motivation. The average food habits score of “I often eat the natural food” was significantly higher in the low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). There was a significantly positive correlation between coffee intake and ‘I purchase the processed food after examining nutrition labels’ of food habits score (r = 0.280; p < 0.01) in female college students. The energy intake of the high 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake was significantly higher in that of the moderate 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake in male college students (p < 0.05). Therefore, it may be necessary for college students to undergo a well-planned nutrition education regarding proper coffee intake, choice of coffee, energy intake related to coffee intake, and dietary habits. (J Nutr Health 2013; 46(6): 560 – 572)

References

1). Choi MK, Lee YS. The relationships among coffee consumption, blood pressure, and serum lipids in Korean adult men and women. Korean J Food Nutr. 2007; 20(4):460–466.
2). Kim WS, Oh KN, Lee YH, Cho KO. Marketing strategy for service quality improvement of specialty Starbucks coffeeshop: a case study. J Foodserv Manage. 2002; 5(1):3–22.
3). Na YS, Kang SU. The analysis toward consumption state, import and export in the world coffee market – the case of Korea, U.S.A., Japan market. Korean J Culinary Res. 2004; 10(3):65–82.
4). Dórea JG, da Costa TH. Is coffee a functional food? Br J Nutr. 2005; 93(6):773–782.
crossref
5). Lee SY, Kozukue N, Han JS, Cho YS. A study of recognition and preference research of coffee. Foodserv Ind J. 2006; 4:25–37.
6). Uto-Kondo H, Ayaori M, Ogura M, Nakaya K, Ito M, Suzuki A, Takiguchi S, Yakushiji E, Terao Y, Ozasa H, Hisada T, Sasaki M, Ohsuzu F, Ikewaki K. Coffee consumption enhances high-den-sity lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol efflux in macrophages. Circ Res. 2010; 106(4):779–787.
crossref
7). van Dam RM, Willett WC, Manson JE, Hu FB. Coffee, caffeine, and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study in younger and middle-aged U.S. women. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(2):398–403.
8). Eskelinen MH, Kivipelto M. Caffeine as a protective factor in dementia and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010; 20(Suppl 1):S167–S174.
crossref
9). Greenberg JA, Chow G, Ziegelstein RC. Caffeinated coffee consumption, cardiovascular disease, and heart valve disease in the elderly (from the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102(11):1052–1058.
crossref
10). Bonnet MH, Arand DL. Caffeine use as a model of acute and chronic insomnia. Sleep. 1992; 15(6):526–536.
11). Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean National health and nutrition examination survey 2010. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2010.
12). Won HR. A study of the relationship between the eating attitude influenced by eating disorder and body shape, nutritional knowledge among female college students in Won Ju province. Korean J Community Nutr. 1998; 3(2):308–316.
13). Kang KJ. A study on food behavior to related health and daily food intakes of female dormitory students according to BMI. Korean J Soc Food Sci. 2001; 17(1):43–54.
14). Ha TS, Park MH, Choi YS, Cho SH. A study on beverage consumption pattern associated with food and nutrient intakes of college students. J Korean Diet Assoc. 1999; 5(1):21–28.
15). Park KM. A study of college students' actual conditions of using coffee shops and choice attributes – focused on Seongnam area. Korean J Food Nutr. 2010; 23(1):52–62.
16). Byun GI, Lee SY, Cho WJ. Study on the importance and customer satisfaction of coffee-shop type according to the choice attributes by university students-focused on Daegu-. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2009; 19(4):503–514.
17). Choi MK, Jun YS. A study on Nutrient Intake status according to coffee intake in Korean female college students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 1997; 7(3):375–382.
18). Bae YJ, Kim MH. A study evaluating nutrient intake and diet quality in female college students according to coffee consumption. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2009; 15(2):128–138.
19). Yeon JY, Bae YJ, Kim MH, Jo HK, Kim EY, Lee JS, Kim MH. Evaluation of nutrient intake and bone status of female college students according to the calorie consumption from coffee containing beverage. Korean J Food Nutr. 2009; 22(3):430–442.
20). Lohman TG. Advances in body composition assessment. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Books;1992. (Current Issues in Exercise Science Series Monograph No.3).
21). Kim JY, Ahn KM. Market segmentation based on emotional-utilitarian motivation – focused on specialty coffee shops. Korean J Culinary Res. 2010; 16(5):103–117.
22). You JS, Chin JH, Kim MJ, Chang KJ. College students' dietary behavior, health-related lifestyles and nutrient intake status by physical activity levels using international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) in Incheon area. Korean J Nutr. 2008; 41(8):818–831.
23). Ko MS. The comparison in daily intake of nutrients and dietary habits of college students in Busan. Korean J Community Nutr. 2007; 12(3):259–271.
24). Song B, Cho J, Lee I, Kim M. A study of the nutritional knowledge and diet practice behavior of college students. Korean J Food Cult. 2008; 23(4):538–542.
25). Lee KA, Cho EJ, Yoon HS. A study on consumption of convenience foods of university students by residing types in Changwon and Masan area. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2010; 16(3):279–290.
26). Cho JY, Song JC. Dietary behavior, health status, and perceived stress of university students. Korean J Food Nutr. 2007; 20(4):476–486.
27). Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statistics 2010: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V-1) [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2011. [cited 2013 Aug 8]. Available from:. http://kn-hanes.cdc.go.kr.
28). Hong MS, Pak HO, Sohn CY. A study on food behaviors and nutrient intakes according to Body Mass Index and body image recognition in female university students from Incheon. Korean J Food Nutr. 2011; 24(3):386–395.
crossref
29). Ki MO, Lee DI. Influence of perceived quality and brand image on the perceived value and loyalty in specialty coffee shop – moderating role of the consumer knowledge. J Foodserv Man30) Jung YW. A study on the positioning strategy of coffee house. Korean J Hosp Adm. 2006; 15(1):269–289.
31). Small Enterprise Development Agency (KR). Trade area information system [Internet]. Daejeon: Small Enterprise Development Agency;2013. [cited 2013 Aug 11]. Available from:. http://sg.seda.or.kr/.
32). Korea Food & Drug Administration. Information for caffeine [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Food & Drug Administration;2013. [cited 2013 Aug 22]. Available from:. http://www.mfds.go.kr.
33). Kwon IB, Lee YS, Woo SK, Lee CY, Suh JG. A study on the determination of caffeine in coffee, black tea and green tea by high performance liquid chromatography. J Food Hyg Saf. 1990; 5(4):213–218.
34). Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79(4):537–543.
crossref
35). Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84(2):274–288.
crossref
36). Lustig RH. Fructose: metabolic, hedonic, and societal parallels with ethanol. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(9):1307–1321.
crossref
37). Korea Food & Drug Administration. Information for sugar [Internet]. Cheongwon: Korea Food & Drug Administration;2013. [cited 2013 Aug 19]. Available from:. http://www.mfds.go.kr.
38). Mosdøl A, Christensen B, Retterstøl L, Thelle DS. Induced changes in the consumption of coffee alter ad libitum dietary intake and physical activity level. Br J Nutr. 2002; 87(3):261–266.
crossref
39). Lim YH, Kim SH. Survey on consumption of coffee beverages and energy contribution ratios of coffee beverages and accompanying snacks by college students in Daejeon city and Chungnam province in Korea. Korean J Food Cult. 2012; 27(3):240–250.
crossref
40). Chung HK, Kim HY, Lee HY. The antecedents of coffee satisfaction by lifestyle segments for Korean and Chinese university students in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr. 2011; 16(6):782–793.
crossref
41). You JS, Park JY, Chang KJ. Correlation among dietary habits score, life stress score and health-related quality of life (HRQL) score for female college students with functional comstipation. Korean J Nutr. 2010; 43(6):620–627.
42). Daly LE, Kirke PN, Molloy A, Weir DG, Scott JM. Folate levels and neural tube defects. JAMA. 1995; 274(21):1698–1702.
crossref
43). Lashner BA, Heidenreich PA, Su GL, Kane SV, Hanauer SB. Effect of folate supplementation on the incidence of dysplasia and cancer in chronic ulcerative colitis. A case-control study. Gastroenterology. 1989; 97(2):255–259.
44). Lim HS, Jin HO, Lee JA. Dietary intakes and status of folate in Korean women of childbearing potential. Korean J Nutr. 2000; 33(3):296–303.
45). Yeon JY, Hong SH, Bae YJ. A study on nutritional status and dietary quality of university students by body image. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012; 17(5):543–554.
crossref
46). Lee MS, Kwak CS. The comparison in daily intake of nutrients, quality of diets and dietary habits between male and female college students in Daejeon. Korean J Community Nutr. 2006; 11(1):39–51.

Fig. 1.
Coffee preference by gender. 1) Etc.: espresso doppio, espresso ris-tretto, espresso macchiato, espresso conpanna
jnh-46-560f1.tif
Table 1.
General characteristics and health-related lifestyle of the subjects
Variables Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
Age (years) 23.4 ± 0.2 22.8 ± 0.3 23.4 ± 0.4 23.2 ± 0.22)***3) 20.8 ± 0.3a4) 20.6 ± 0.2 a 21.6 ± 0.3 b 21.0 ± 0.2
Type of residence
  Living with family 24 (63.2) 17 (54.8) 19 (59.4) 60 (59.4)5) 19 (76.0) 27 (84.4) 18 (56.3) 64 (71.9)
  Living by oneself 13 (34.2) 9 (29.0) 9 (28.1) 31 (30.7) 3 (12.0) 3 (9.4) 8 (25.0) 14 (15.7)
  Dormitory or etc. 1 (2.6) 5 (16.1) 4 (12.5) 10 (9.9) 3 (12.0) 2 (6.3) 6 (18.8) 11 (12.4)
Pocket money (1,000 won/month)
  <200 7 (18.4) 7 (22.6) 6 (18.8) 20 (19.8) 4 (16.0) 8 (25.0) 4 (12.5) 16 (18.0)
  200–400 26 (68.4) 16 (51.6) 15 (46.9) 57 (56.4) 15 (60.0) 19 (59.4) 20 (62.5) 54 (60.7)
  ≥400 5 (13.2) 8 (25.8) 11 (34.4) 24 (23.8) 6 (24.0) 5 (15.6) 8 (25.0) 19 (21.3)
Eating out (times/week)
  ≤1 6 (15.8) 7 (22.6) 7 (21.9) 20 (19.8) 7 (28.0) 7 (21.9) 7 (21.9) 21 (20.2)
  2–4 22 (57.9) 16 (51.6) 9 (28.1) 47 (46.5) 9 (36.0) 17 (53.1) 17 (53.1) 43 (48.3)
  ≥5 10 (26.3) 8 (25.8) 16 (50.0) 34 (33.7) 9 (36.0) 8 (25.0) 8 (25.0) 25 (28.1)
Frequency of exercise (times/week)
  None 6 (15.8) 6 (19.4) 7 (21.9) 19 (18.8)*** 13 (52.0) 19 (59.4) 12 (37.5) 44 (49.4)
  1–2 19 (50.0) 15 (48.4) 13 (40.6) 47 (46.5) 7 (28.0) 8 (25.0) 12 (37.5) 27 (30.3)
  3–5 11 (28.9) 7 (22.6) 10 (31.3) 28 (27.7) 5 (20.0) 3 (9.4) 7 (21.9) 15 (16.9)
  6–7 2 (5.3) 3 (9.7) 2 (6.3) 7 (6.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.3) 1 (3.1) 3 (3.4)
Frequency of alcohol drinking (times/week)
  None 13 (34.2) 7 (22.6) 3 (9.4) 23 (22.8) 10 (40.0) 13 (40.6) 6 (18.8) 29 (32.6)
  ≤1 18 (47.4) 15 (48.4) 23 (71.9) 56 (55.4) 10 (40.0) 15 (46.9) 20 (62.5) 45 (50.6)
  2–4 6 (15.8) 9 (29.0) 4 (12.5) 19 (18.8) 4 (16.0) 4 (12.5) 6 (18.8) 14 (15.7)
  ≥ 5 1 (2.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.3) 3 (3.0) 2 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.1)

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) Superscripts are significantly different between male and female by student t-test or chi-square test (*: p < 0.05 **: p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001).

4) Superscripts are significantly different among groups according to coffee intake percentile by duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

5) n (%)

Table 2.
Anthropometric parameters
Variables Male (n = 101) Female (n = 89)
LP group 1) (n = 38) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
Height (cm) 174.0 ± 0.9 174.6 ± 0.8 174.4 ± 1.0 174.3 ± 0.52)***3) 161.8 ± 1.1 161.0 ± 1.0 162.9 ± 1.0 161.9 ± 0.6
Weight (kg) 70.2 ± 1.1 70.4 ± 1.2 71.5 ± 1.7 70.7 ± 0.8*** 55.7 ± 2.3 54.3 ± 0.9 56.6 ± 1.2 55.5 ± 0.8
Percent body Fat (%) 17.0 ± 0.8 16.9 ± 0.8 16.9 ± 1.0 16.9 ± 0.5*** 26.6 ± 1.6 26.9 ± 0.7 26.4 ± 0.7 26.6 ± 0.6
BMI (kg/m2)4) 23.2 ± 0.3 23.1 ± 0.4 23.5 ± 0.5 23.3 ± 0.2*** 21.2 ± 0.8 21.0 ± 0.3 21.3 ± 0.3 21.2 ± 0.3
  Underweight (<18.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)*** 6 (24.0) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 8 (9.0)
  Normal (18.5–23) 20 (52.6) 14 (45.2) 18 (56.3) 52 (51.5) 12 (48.0) 25 (78.1) 24 (75.0) 61 (68.5)
  Overweight (23–25) 12 (31.6) 12 (38.7) 5 (15.6) 29 (28.7) 2 (8.0) 5 (15.6) 6 (18.8) 13 (14.6)
  Obesity (≥25) 6 (15.8) 5 (16.1) 9 (28.1) 20 (19.8) 5 (20.0) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1) 7 (7.9)

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) Superscripts are significantly different between male and female by student t-test or chi-square test (*: p < 0.001).

4) BMI: Body Mass Index

Table 3.
Coffee intake motivation by gender and group
Variables Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
Emotional motivation 8.3 ± 0.5 a 9.5 ± 0.4ab 10.6 ± 0.4b 9.4 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 0.5a 10.1 ± 0.4b 11.3 ± 0.4c 10.0 ± 0.3
  Flavor and aroma 3.6 ± 0.22) a3) 3.9 ± 0.2 ab 4.2 ± 0.2 b 3.9 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.1
  Habit 2.0 ± 0.2 a 2.7 ± 0.2 b 3.2 ± 0.2 b 2.6 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.2 a 2.8 ± 0.2 b 3.9 ± 0.2 c 2.9 ± 0.1
  Atmosphere 2.8 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1
Utilitarian motivation 7.3 ± 0.5 a 7.7 ± 0.4 ab 8.8 ± 0.4 b 7.9 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.5 a 8.0 ± 0.5 b 9.0 ± 0.5 b 8.0 ± 0.3
  Prevention of sleepness 2.8 ± 0.2 a 3.5 ± 0.2 b 3.7 ± 0.2 b 3.3 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.1
  Reduction of stress 1.8 ± 0.2 a 1.8 ± 0.2 a 2.5 ± 0.2 b 2.1 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2 a 1.9 ± 0.2 a 3.0 ± 0.2 b 2.2 ± 0.1
  Meeting 2.6 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake:(200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) Superscripts are significantly different among groups according to coffee intake percentile by duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Table 4.
Dietary habits score by gender and group according to coffee intake percentile
Dietary habits Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
I eat a breakfast regularly. 3.2 ± 0.22) 3.4 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 0.2 NS3) 3.3 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.1
I eat three meals a day. 3.1 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1
I have enough time to eat a meal. . 2.5 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1
I eat the variety foods. 3.2 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1
I don’t eat too much. 2.6 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.1
I don’t eat the salty food. 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1
I eat the meat, fish, bean, egg or tofu everyday. 3.4 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2
I don’t eat the fried or stir-fired food. 3.6 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.1
I eat the milk or dairy product everyday. 3.1 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1
I eat the vegetable, seaweed or mushroom every meal. 3.1 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1
I eat the fruit everyday. 2.9 ± 0.2 a4) 2.5 ± 0.2 b 2.9 ± 0.2 b 2.8 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.1
I often eat the natural food. 3.1 ± 0.1a4) 2.7 ± 0.2b 2.7 ± 0.1b 2.8 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.1
I purchase the processed food after examining nutrition labels. 2.4 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1
I apply nutrition knowledge to everyday. 3.3 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1
Total score 41.2 ± 1.3 40.7 ± 1.2 41.8 ± 1.3 41.3 ± 0.7 40.9 ± 1.0 41.8 ± 1.2 41.4 ± 1.2 41.4 ± 0.7

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) NS: Not significant

4) Superscripts are significantly different among groups according to coffee intake percentile by duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Table 5.
Correlation of coffee intake and dietary habits score
Dietary habits Male Female Total
Coffee intake (n = 101) Coffee intake (n = 89) Coffee intake (n = 190)
I eat a breakfast regularly. 0.0771) 0.100 0.086
I eat three meals a day. 0.044 0.080 0.060
I have enough time to eat a meal. 0.057 0.078 0.061
I eat the variety foods. 0.116 –0.104 0.038
I don’t eat too much. 0.027 0.021 0.024
I don’t eat the salty food. 0.006 –0.008 –0.001
I eat the meat, fish, bean, egg or tofu everyday. –0.015 –0.055 –0.028
I don’t eat the fried or stir-fired food. 0.079 0.043 0.064
I eat the milk or dairy product everyday. 0.111 0.115 0.114
I eat the vegetable, seaweed or mushroom every meal. 0.037 –0.109 –0.018
I eat the fruit everyday. 0.051 0.032 0.040
I often eat the natural food. 0.015 0.027 0.021
I purchase the processed food after examining nutrition labels. 0.102 0.280**2) 0.167*
I apply nutrition knowledge to everyday. –0.060 0.128 0.011
Total score 0.082 0.105 0.090

1) Pearson's correlation coefficient

2) Values with superscripts are significantly correlated by Pearson's correlation

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

Table 6.
Nutrients intake by gender and group according to coffee intake percentile
Variables Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
Energy (kcal) 1,751.0 ± 55.22) ab3) 1,611.4 ± 60.1 a 1,910.7 ± 88.2 b 1,761.7 ± 41.0 1,557.4 ± 70.7 1,566.5 ± 72.2 1,477.0 ± 66.9 1,531.7 ± 40.4
%EER 67.3 ± 2.1 64.1 ± 2.6 73.5 ± 3.4 68.3 ± 1.6 74.2 ± 3.4 74.6 ± 3.4 70.3 ± 3.2 72.9 ± 1.9
Carbohydrate(g) 240.5 ± 6.7 244.0 ± 10.4 268.0 ± 12.1 250.6 ± 5.7 210.4 ± 7.8 217.5 ± 8.2 225.1 ± 11.0 218.1 ± 5.3
Protein (g) 69.6 ± 2.8 73.2 ± 7.0 74.2 ± 3.8 72.2 ± 2.7 58.8 ± 3.6 56.9 ± 3.0 54.9 ± 3.1 56.7 ± 1.9
%RI 126.5 ± 5.0 133.2 ± 12.8 135.0 ± 6.9 131.2 ± 4.8 117.7 ± 7.2 113.9 ± 6.0 109.7 ± 6.3 113.4 ± 3.7
Vit A (μ gR.E) 629.6 ± 33.8 586.8 ± 41.2 712.0 ± 64.9 642.6 ± 27.5 635.1 ± 55.0 639.3 ± 54.4 518.7 ± 36.1 594.7 ± 28.5
%RI 83.9 ± 4.5 78.2 ± 5.5 94.9 ± 8.6 85.7 ± 3.7 97.7 ± 8.5 98.4 ± 8.4 79.8 ± 5.6 91.5 ± 4.4
Vit B1 (mg) 1.28 ± 0.05 1.17 ± 0.06 1.32 ± 0.08 1.26 ± 0.04 1.07 ± 0.06 1.13 ± 0.12 0.96 ± 0.06 1.05 ± 0.05
%RI 106.4 ± 4.1 97.6 ± 4.8 109.6 ± 6.9 104.7 ± 3.1 97.1 ± 5.6 102.3 ± 11.0 87.5 ± 5.7 95.5 ± 4.7
Vit B2 (mg) 1.05 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.05 1.17 ± 0.08 1.07 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.05 1.15 ± 0.19 0.86 ± 0.06 0.98 ± 0.08
%RI 70.0 ± 3.4 65.6 ± 3.5 77.9 ± 5.4 71.2 ± 2.4 77.3 ± 4.2 96.1 ± 16.0 71.6 ± 5.2 82.0 ± 6.2
Niacin (mg) 15.7 ± 0.6 17.7 ± 3.3 16.4 ± 1.1 16.5 ± 1.1 13.3 ± 1.0 13.7 ± 1.7 13.2 ± 0.8 13.4 ± 0.7
%RI 98.0 ± 3.9 110.7 ± 20.5 102.5 ± 7.0 103.3 ± 6.8 95.3 ± 6.8 97.7 ± 11.8 93.9 ± 5.4 95.7 ± 5.0
Folic acid (μ gDFE) 193.9 ± 11.3 177.3 ± 12.8 200.2 ± 14.4 190.8 ± 7.4 170.6 ± 11.0 174.6 ± 14.0 162.4 ± 11.1 169.1 ± 7.1
%RI 48.5 ± 2.8 44.3 ± 3.2 50.0 ± 3.6 47.7 ± 1.8 42.7 ± 2.7 43.7 ± 3.5 40.6 ± 2.8 42.3 ± 1.8
Vit C (mg) 61.9 ± 2.9 56.7 ± 4.6 60.4 ± 5.9 59.8 ± 2.6 54.3 ± 4.6 50.7 ± 5.4 50.8 ± 4.3 51.7 ± 2.8
%RI 61.9 ± 2.9 56.7 ± 4.6 60.4 ± 5.9 59.8 ± 2.6 54.3 ± 4.6 50.7 ± 5.4 50.8 ± 4.3 51.7 ± 2.8
Ca (mg) 409.0 ± 20.1 397.5 ± 32.3 435.5 ± 27.4 413.9 ± 15.1 387.0 ± 27.3 385.7 ± 23.3 342.5 ± 21.2 370.5 ± 13.7
%RI 54.5 ± 2.7 53.0 ± 4.3 58.1 ± 3.7 55.2 ± 2.0 59.5 ± 4.2 59.3 ± 3.6 52.7 ± 3.3 57.0 ± 2.1
P (mg) 890.6 ± 35.6 911.9 ± 62.0 973.9 ± 48.3 923.5 ± 27.8 791.1 ± 48.6 752.0 ± 40.8 726.7 ± 38.5 753.9 ± 24.2
%RI 127.2 ± 5.1 130.3 ± 8.9 139.1 ± 6.9 131.9 ± 4.0 113.0 ± 6.9 107.4 ± 5.8 103.8 ± 5.5 107.7 ± 3.5
Fe (mg) 11.5 ± 0.4 11.8 ± 0.8 12.6 ± 0.7 11.9 ± 0.4 10.9 ± 0.6 10.5 ± 0.9 9.9 ± 0.6 10.4 ± 0.4
%RI 114.9 ± 3.8 118.0 ± 7.7 125.6 ± 7.4 119.3 ± 3.6 77.8 ± 4.6 75.0 ± 6.5 71.0 ± 4.4 74.3 ± 3.1

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) Superscripts are significantly different among groups according to coffee intake percentile by duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Table 7.
Correlation of coffee intake and nutrients intake
Factors Male Female Total
Coffee intake (n = 101) Coffee intake (n = 89) Coffee intake (n = 190)
Energy (kcal) 0.2751)**2) –0.001 0.169*
Cabohydrate 0.269** 0.067 0.192**
Protein (g) 0.201* –0.054 0.124
Vit A (μ gR.E) 0.226* –0.126 0.088
Vit B1 (mg) 0.184 –0.066 0.067
Vit B2 (mg) 0.230* –0.069 0.057
Niacin (mg) 0.069 0.011 0.056
Folic acid (μ gDFE) 0.103 0.076 0.095
Vit C (mg) 0.199* 0.010 0.124
Vit E (mg) 0.199* 0.076 0.144*
Ca (mg) 0.211* –0.056 0.116
P (mg) 0.272** –0.035 0.163*
Fe (mg) 0.347*** –0.080 0.162*
Na (mg) 0.250* –0.119 0.135
K (mg) 0.247* 0.030 0.169*
Zn (mg) 0.250* 0.017 0.155

1) Pearson's correlation coefficient

2) Values with superscripts are significantly correlated by Pearson's correlation

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001).

Table 8
Nutrient density (ND) by gender and group according to coffee intake percentile
Variables Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
Protein (g/1,000 kcal) 39.7 ± 0.82) 43.6±3.7 39.4 ± 1.1 NS3) 40.8 ± 1.2 37.4 ± 0.9 36.4 ± 0.9 36.9 ± 1.0 36.8 ± 0.6
Vit A (μ gR.E/1,000 kcal) 362.5 ± 17.5 348.3 ± 18.5 381.7 ± 31.4 364.2 ± 13.2 406.2 ± 29.9 403.7 ± 25.0 356.7 ± 23.2 387.5 ± 14.9
Vit B1 (mg/1,000 kcal) 0.73 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.03 0.68 ± 0.02
Vit B2 (mg/1,000 kcal) 0.60 ± 0.02 0.59 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.01 0.60 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.09 0.58 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.03
Niacin (mg/1,000 kcal) 9.0 ± 0.3 10.5 ± 1.9 8.6 ± 0.4 9.3 ± 0.6 8.6 ± 0.5 8.3 ± 0.6 8.9 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.3
Folic acid (mg/1,000 kcal) 110.7 ± 4.9 104.1 ± 5.0 104.9 ± 5.8 106.8 ± 3.0 108.9 ± 4.8 110.0 ± 5.2 108.3 ± 4.5 109.0 ± 2.8
Vit C (mg/1,000 kcal) 35.9 ± 1.6 33.3 ± 2.2 31.1 ± 2.0 33.6 ± 1.1 34.7 ± 2.3 31.9 ± 2.0 34.2 ± 2.4 33.5 ± 1.3
Ca (mg/1,000 kcal) 231.9 ± 7.5 233.2 ± 14.1 232.4 ± 12.4 232.4 ± 6.4 248.0 ± 14.4 247.0 ± 9.6 230.3 ± 9.2 241.3 ± 6.3
P (mg/1,000 kcal) 506.8 ± 9.4 538.7 ± 24.7 514.8 ± 13.2 519.1 ± 9.4 502.1 ± 15.8 481.1 ± 12.9 490.5 ± 12.3 490.4 ± 7.8
Fe (mg/1,000 kcal) 6.7 ± 0.2 7.0 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.2 6.7 ± 0.1 7.0 ± 0.3 6.7 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.2 6.7 ± 0.2

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) NS: Not significant

Table 9.
Nutrient Adequancy Ratio (NAR) by gender and percentile group according to coffee intake
Variables Male Female
LP group (n = 38)1) MP group (n = 31) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 101) LP group (n = 25) MP group (n = 32) HP group (n = 32) Total (n = 89)
NAR                
  Protein 0.98 ± 0.012) 0.96 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.01 NS3) 0.97 ± 0.01 0.94 ± 0.02 0.95 ± 0.02 0.90 ± 0.03 0.93 ± 0.01
  Vit A 0.78 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.4 0.80 ± 0.04 0.77 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.04 0.79 ± 0.02
  Vit B1 0.93 ± 0.02 0.87 ± 0.03 0.90 ± 0.03 0.91 ± 0.01 0.87 ± 0.03 0.84 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.04 0.83 ± 0.02
  Vit B2 0.68 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.04 0.72 ± 0.04 0.67 ± 0.04 0.72 ± 0.02
  Niacin 0.90 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.03 0.88 ± 0.03 0.87 ± 0.02 0.85 ± 0.04 0.79 ± 0.04 0.84 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.02
  Vit C 0.62 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.05 0.56 ± 0.04 0.58 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.05 0.48 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.04 0.50 ± 0.02
  Ca 0.55 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.03 0.55 ± 0.02 0.60 ± 0.04 0.58 ± 0.03 0.53 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.02
  P 0.97 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.02 0.99 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.03 0.92 ± 0.02 0.89 ± 0.03 0.91 ± 0.01
  Fe 0.96 ± 0.02 0.92 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.02 0.95 ± 0.01 0.77 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.03 0.68 ± 0.04 0.71 ± 0.02
MAR 0.82 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.01 0.79 ± 0.03 0.75 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.03 0.75 ± 0.02

1) LP group: Low 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (coffee intake < 100 mL), MP group: Midium 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake (100 mL ≤ coffee intake < 200 mL), HP group: High 1/3 percentile group according to coffee intake: (200 mL ≤ coffee intake)

2) Mean ± SE

3) NS: Not significant

TOOLS
Similar articles