Journal List > J Nutr Health > v.46(6) > 1081315

Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Choi, Bak, Lim, Suh, and Lee: Effect of fermented soybean curd residue (FSCR; SCR-meju) by aspergillus oryzae on the anti-obesity and lipids improvement*

Abstract

In this study, we designed to confirm the dietary effect of anti-obesity of fermented soybean curd residue (FSCR; SCR-Meju; Biji-meju) by A. oryzae, which is well known as a Korean traditional meju microbe. We observed that body weight gain, serum and hepatic lipid profile, as well as the activity of ROS generating enzyme and ROS scavenging enzyme in high-fat diet induced obese mice fed experimental diet (SCR and SCR-meju). Body weight gain and epididymal fat weight of HC (high-fat diet control) was markedly higher than that of NC (Normal control). Conversely, body weight gain and epididymal fat weight of the SCR (Biji) and SCR-meju (Biji-meju) group was significantly lower than that of HC; these of the SCR-meju group was lower than that of the SCR group. Furthermore, serum TG and total-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol contents of SCR and SCR-meju groups were lower than that of HC, and HDL-cholesterol level of the SCR-meju group was significantly higher than that of HC. In conclusion, although precise mechanisms of the antiobese effects of SCR-meju in this study are unknown, the present study provides an experimental evidence that SCR-meju may pre-vent obesity and obesity related metabolic syndromes, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, and liver disease by high-fat diet. Nevertheless, further study in this filed will be needed. (J Nutr Health 2013; 46(6): 493 – 502)

References

1). Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000; 404(6778):635–643.
crossref
2). Hossain P, Kawar B, El Nahas M. Obesity and diabetes in the developing world–a growing challenge. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(3):213–215.
3). Grundy SM. Multifactorial causation of obesity: implications for prevention. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998; 67(3 Suppl):563S–572S.
crossref
4). Ferraro KF, Su YP, Gretebeck RJ, Black DR, Badylak SF. Body mass index and disability in adulthood: a 20-year panel study. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(5):834–840.
crossref
5). Mukherjee M. Human digestive and metabolic lipases – a brief review. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2003; 22(5–6):369–376.
6). Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, Nakayama O, Makishima M, Matsuda M, Shimomura I. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2004; 114(12):1752–1761.
crossref
7). Drew BS, Dixon AF, Dixon JB. Obesity management: update on orlistat. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007; 3(6):817–821.
8). Poston WS, Foreyt JP. Sibutramine and the management of obesity. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004; 5(3):633–642.
crossref
9). Karamadoukis L, Shivashankar GH, Ludeman L, Williams AJ. An unusual complication of treatment with orlistat. Clin Nephrol. 2009; 71(4):430–432.
crossref
10). Slovacek L, Pavlik V, Slovackova B. The effect of sibutramine therapy on occurrence of depression symptoms among obese patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008; 18(8):e43–e44.
crossref
11). Birari RB, Bhutani KK. Pancreatic lipase inhibitors from natural sources: unexplored potential. Drug Discov Today. 2007; 12(19–20):879–889.
crossref
12). Halford JC, Blundell JE. Pharmacology of appetite suppression. Prog Drug Res. 2000; 54:25–58.
crossref
13). Redinger RN. Fat storage and the biology of energy expenditure. Transl Res. 2009; 154(2):52–60.
crossref
14). Madsen L, Petersen RK, Kristiansen K. Regulation of adipocyte differentiation and function by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1740(2):266–286.
crossref
15). Langin D. Adipose tissue lipolysis as a metabolic pathway to define pharmacological strategies against obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Pharmacol Res. 2006; 53(6):482–491.
crossref
16). Rayalam S, Della-Fera MA, Baile CA. Phytochemicals and regulation of the adipocyte life cycle. J Nutr Biochem. 2008; 19(11):717–726.
crossref
17). Yang JY, Lee SJ, Park HW, Cha YS. Effect of genistein with car-nitine administration on lipid parameters and obesity in C57Bl/6J mice fed a high-fat diet. J Med Food. 2006; 9(4):459–467.
crossref
18). Moriyama T, Kishimoto K, Nagai K, Urade R, Ogawa T, Utsumi S, Maruyama N, Maebuchi M. Soybean β-conglycinin diet suppresses serum triglyceride levels in normal and genetically obese mice by induction of β-oxidation, downregulation of fatty acid synthase, and inhibition of triglyceride absorption. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004; 68(2):352–359.
crossref
19). Harmon AW, Harp JB. Differential effects of flavonoids on 3T3-L1 adipogenesis and lipolysis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 280(4):C807–C813.
crossref
20). Shi M, Yang Y, Guan D, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Bioactivity of the crude polysaccharides from fermented soybean curd residue by Flam-mulina velutipes. Carbohydr Polym. 2012; 89(4):1268–1276.
crossref
21). Choi MS, Kim JI, Jeong JB, Lee S, Jeong JN, Jeong HJ, Seo EW, Kim TY, Kwon OJ, Lim JH. Suppressive effects of by-product extracts from soybean on adipocyte differentiation and expression of obesity-related genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Life Sci. 2011; 21(3):358–367.
crossref
22). Matsumoto K, Watanabe Y, Yokoyama S. Okara, soybean residue, prevents obesity in a diet-induced murine obesity model. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007; 71(3):720–727.
crossref
23). Choi UK, Kim MH, Lee NH, Jeong YS, Hwang YH. Changes in quality characteristics of Meju made with germinated soybean during fermentation. Korean J Food Sci Technol. 2007; 39(3):304–308.
24). Lee J, Jeong JY, Cho YS, Park SK, Kim K, Kim MJ, Lee MK. Effect of young Phragmites communis leaves powder on lipid metabolism and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in high-fat diet fed mice. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2010; 39(5):677–683.
crossref
25). Reitman S, Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transam-inases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1957; 28(1):56–63.
crossref
26). Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18(6):499–502.
crossref
27). Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226(1):497–509.
crossref
28). Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959; 82(1):70–77.
crossref
29). Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979; 95(2):351–358.
crossref
30). Stirpe F, Della Corte E. The regulation of rat liver xanthine oxidase. Conversion in vitro of the enzyme activity from dehydrogenase (type D) to oxidase (type O). J Biol Chem. 1969; 244(14):3855–3863.
31). Martin JP Jr, Dailey M, Sugarman E. Negative and positive assays of superoxide dismutase based on hematoxylin autoxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1987; 255(2):329–336.
crossref
32). Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974; 249(22):7130–7139.
33). Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967; 70(1):158–169.
34). Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193(1):265–275.
crossref
35). Wu YG, Xia LL, Lin H, Zhou D, Qian H, Lin ST. Prevention of early liver injury by breviscapine in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Planta Med. 2007; 73(5):433–438.
crossref
36). Ha SK, Chae C. Inducible nitric oxide distribution in the fatty liver of a mouse with high fat diet-induced obesity. Exp Anim. 2010; 59(5):595–604.
crossref
37). Wang RS, Nakajima T, Honma T. Different change patterns of the isozymes of cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferas-es in chemically induced liver damage in rat. Ind Health. 1999; 37(4):440–448.
crossref
38). Gordon T, Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Dawber TR. Lipoproteins, cardiovascular disease, and death. The Framingham study. Arch Intern Med. 1981; 141(9):1128–1131.
crossref
39). Yao T, Sato M, Kobayashi Y, Wasa T. Amperometric assays of total and free cholesterols in serum by the combined use of immobilized cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase reactors and peroxidase electrode in a flow injection system. Anal Biochem. 1985; 149(2):387–391.
crossref
40). Hashim MS, Lincy S, Remya V, Teena M, Anila L. Effect of poly-phenolic compounds from Coriandrum sativum on H2O2-induced oxidative stress in human lymphocytes. Food Chem. 2005; 92(4):653–660.
41). Lee SI, Kim JW, Lee YK, Yang SH, Lee IA, Suh JW, Kim SD. Protective effect of Monascus pilosus mycelial extract on hepatic damage in high-fat diet induced-obese rats. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2011; 54(3):206–213.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Preparation procedure of fermented soybean curd residue (SCR-meju).
jnh-46-493f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the changes in body weight gain (% against initial) of mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Fig. 1 and Table 1. Values are means (n = 6), and the values of the final week are mean ± standard deviations (n = 6). Different superscripts on the final week indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Effects of FSCR supplemented diets on the weight of fat around epididymis in mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Table 1. Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the figures indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the content of hepatic TG and TC in mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Table 1. Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the figures indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the content of glutathione total lipid peroxide in mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Table 1. Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the figures indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the serum ALT activity in mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Table 1. Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the figures indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f6.tif
Fig. 7.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the activities of XO, SOD, GPX and GST in liver of mouse fed for 8 weeks. See Table 1. Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the figures indicates significant differences (p < 0.05).
jnh-46-493f7.tif
Fig. 8.
Light microscopic photographs of liver tissue (bar: 25 µ m) of mouse fed with experimental diets for 8 weeks (HE stain). The hepatocytes in HC group are distended by accumulation of multiple fat droplets and sinusoids are occluded (arrow).
jnh-46-493f8.tif
Table 1.
Experimental groups and ingredients of diets (%)
Ingredients Experimental groups 1)
  NC HC SCR SCR-meju
Pellet stew (5L79 diets)2) 100 65 63 63
Lard 35 35 35
Soybean curd residue (SCR)3) 2
SCR fermented by A. oryzae 4) 2

1) NC: normal control group, HC: high fat supplemented control group, SCR: soybean curd residue supplemented high fat diet group, SCR-meju: SCR fermented by A. oryzae supplemented high fat diet group

2) The diets for animal experiments manufactured in PMI Nutrition, LLC, Brentwood, MO, USA. Guaranteed analysis: crude protein 18%, crude fat 5%, crude fiber 5%, ash 8%

3) Moisture 3.28%, crude protein 20.34%, crude fat 8.72%, carbohydrate 23.94%, fiber 40.81%, ash 2.91%

4) moisture 3.45%, crude protein 16.55%, crude fat 7.95%, carbohydrate 29.07%. fiber 39.95%, ash 3.03%

Table 2.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on body weight gain and feed efficiency ratio of mouse fed for 8 weeks
Measurements Experimental plots 1)
NC HC SCR SCR-meju
Initial body weight (g) 30.70 ± 1.45 NS3) 30.60 ± 1.53 32.40 ± 1.38 31.00 ± 1.40
Final body weight (g) 36.70 ± 2.21 b4) 44.49 ± 2.30a 43.22 ± 2.09a 37.75 ± 2.24 b
Feed intakes (g/week) 41.92 ± 2.24 NS 40.40 ± 2.19 41.68 ± 2.32 40.88 ± 2.40
Calorie intakes (kcal/week) 156.36 ± 8.36 b 225.22 ± 12.21 a 233.37 ± 12.43 a 228.90 ± 13.44 a
Weight gain (g/week) 0.75 ± 0.04 c 1.74 ± 0.09 a 1.35 ± 0.07 b 0.84 ± 0.05 c
Water intakes (mL/week) 62.00 ± 4.96 a 33.20 ± 3.21b 35.24 ± 2.98b 39.20 ± 3.75b
FER 2) 0.02 ± 0.00 b 0.04 ± 0.01 a 0.03 ± 0.005 a 0.02 ± 0.00 b

1) See Fig. 1 and Table 1.

2) Feed efficiency ratio = Weight gain/Feed intakes

3) Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 6), different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

4) Not significant

Table 3.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on organs weight of mouse fed for 8 weeks (relative % of body weight)
Organs Experimental plots 1)
NC HC SCR SCR-meju
Liver 4.43 ± 0.19 ab2) 4.09 ± 0.20 b 4.52 ± 0.21 a 4.59 ± 0.22 a
Kidney 1.97 ± 0.11 a 1.48 ± 0.07 c 1.70 ± 0.09 b 1.77 ± 0.09 ab
Heart 0.58 ± 0.03 ab 0.53 ± 0.03 b 0.57 ± 0.04 b 0.64 ± 0.05 a
Testis 0.72 ± 0.04 a 0.57 ± 0.03 c 0.57 ± 0.02 c 0.64 ± 0.03 b

1) See Fig. 1 and Table 1.

2) Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 6), different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

Table 4.
Effects of SCR and SCR-meju supplemented high fat diets on the content of serum lipid profiles in mouse fed for 8 weeks
Measurements NC 1) HC 2) SCR 3) SCR-meju 4)
TG (mg/dL) 87.36 ± 2.94 b7) 115.06 ± 6.15 a 74.15 ± 4.33 cd 71.17 ± 3.95 d
TC (mg/dL) 136.20 ± 7.22 c 233.75 ± 9.37 a 203.38 ± 8.26 b 186.78 ± 9.75 b
HDL-C (mg/dL) 54.24 ± 3.18 a 43.44 ± 3.12 c 48.40 ± 2.97 bc 52.40 ± 2.88 ab
LDL-C (mg/dL)5) 64.49 ± 3.22 d 167.30 ± 8.37 a 140.15 ± 7.01 b 120.15 ± 6.01 c
AI 6) 1.51 ± 0.09 d 4.38 ± 0.26 a 3.20 ± 0.16 b 2.56 ± 0.13 c

1–4) See Table 1.

5) LDL-cholesterol = total cholesterol – (triglyceride / 5 + HDL-cholesterol)

6) AI: altherogenic index = (Total cholesterol – HDL-cholesterol) / HDL-cholesterol

7) Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 5), different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

TOOLS
Similar articles