Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.28(6) > 1076434

Lee: Factors associated with Life Satisfaction among Older Adults in Korea according to Living Arrangements

Abstract

Purpose

This study utilized secondary data and investigated the factors associated with life satisfaction by living arrangements among community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older in Korea.

Methods

A total of 2,134 participants were selected from the 2014 Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used for data analysis.

Results

The significant factors associated with life satisfaction in older adults living with others were education level (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41~2.11), place of residence in medium-size city (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.25~1.97), place of residence in rural town(OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.19~1.95), depression (OR 2.99, 95% CI 2.43~3.68), frequency of contact with neighbors (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10~1.76), and social participation (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14~1.93). In contrast, factors associated with life satisfaction among older adults living alone were education level (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.15~3.24) and depression (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.48~4.19).

Conclusion

These findings indicated that nursing interventions for improving life satisfaction among older adults should take into account their specific living arrangements.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Substruction of the study.

kjan-28-659-g001
Table 1

Differences according to Living Arrangements among Older Adults (N=2,134)

kjan-28-659-i001

Missing data excluded; IADLs=instrumental activities of daily living scale.

Table 2

Factors associated with Life Satisfaction among Older Adults Living with Others (N=1,873)

kjan-28-659-i002

IADLs=instrumental activities of daily living scale; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

Table 3

Factors associated with Life Satisfaction among Older Adults Living Alone (N=261)

kjan-28-659-i003

IADLs=instrumental activities of daily living scale; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

References

1. Statistics Korea. Population by age [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2016. cited 2016 November 16. Available from: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1010#quick_05.
2. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD better life index [Internet]. Paris: OECD;2015. cited 2016 August 5. Available from: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/life-satisfaction/.
3. Statistics Korea. 2015 senior citizen statistics [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2015. cited 2016 August 7. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=348565.
4. Li C, Chi I, Zhang X, Cheng Z, Zhang L, Chen G. Urban and rural factors associated with life satisfaction among older Chinese adults. Aging Ment Health. 2015; 19(10):947–954. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2014.977767.
crossref
5. Meggiolaro S, Ongaro F. Life satisfaction among older people in Italy in a gender approach. Ageing Soc. 2015; 35:1481–1504. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X14000646.
crossref
6. Heisel MJ, Neufeld E, Flett GL. Reasons for living, meaning in life, and suicide ideation: investigating the roles of key positive psychological factors in reducing suicide risk in community-residing older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2016; 20(2):195–207. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078279.
crossref
7. Kim J, Lee YS, Lee J. Living arrangements and suicidal ideation among the Korean older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2015; 20(12):1305–1313. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078280.
crossref
8. Kim SY, Sok SR. Relationships among the perceived health status, family support and life satisfaction of older Korean adults. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012; 18(4):325–331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02050.x.
crossref
9. Sok SR. Factors influencing life satisfaction of Korean older adults living with family. J Gerontol Nurs. 2010; 36(3):32–40. DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20100202-01.
crossref
10. Chung SD, Lee SH. Change in life satisfaction of Korean elderly: comparisons of 1994, 2004, 2008 national survey results on the elderly life conditions and welfare need. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2011; 31(4):1229–1246.
11. Shin SH, Sok SR. A comparison of the factors influencing life satisfaction between Korean older people living with family and living alone. Int Nurs Rev. 2011; 59(2):252–258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00946.x.
crossref
12. Guan J, Li H, Sun H, Wang T, Wu W. The impact of a discrepancy between actual and preferred living arrangements on life satisfaction among the elderly in China. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015; 70(9):623–627. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)05.
crossref
13. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2014 a national survey on the living status and welfare needs of the aged. Policy Report. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2014. 12. p. Report No.: 11-1352000-001426-12.
14. Levine ME. The four conservation principles of nursing. Nurs Forum. 1967; 6(1):45–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.1967.tb01297.x.
crossref
15. Levine ME. Conservation and integrity. In : Parker M, editor. Nursing theories in practice. New York: National League for Nursing;1990. p. 189–201.
16. Zalon ML. Correlates of recovery among older adults after major abdominal surgery. Nurs Res. 2004; 53(2):99–106.
crossref
17. Dulock HL, Holzemer WL. Substruction: improving the linkage from theory to method. Nurs Sci Q. 1991; 4(2):83–87.
crossref
18. Korea Employment Information Service. 2014 Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) basic analysis report. Research Report. Eumseonggun: Korea Employment Information Service;2015. 12. p. Report No.: 2015-05.
19. Lee KS, Cheong HK, Oh BH, Hong CH. Comparison of the validity of screening tests for dementia and mild cognitive impairment of the elderly in a community: K-MMSE, MMSE-K, MMSE-KC, and K-HDS. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2009; 48(2):61–69.
20. WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403):157–163. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15268-3.
21. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3):179–186.
crossref
22. Won CW, Rho YG, Duk SW, Lee YS. The validity and reliability of Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) Scale. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2002; 6(4):273–280.
23. Lee SE, Hong GRS. Predictors of depression among community-dwelling older women living alone in Korea. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016; 30(5):513–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.05.002.
crossref
24. Kohout FJ, Berkman LF, Evans DA, Cornoni-Huntley J. Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. J Aging Health. 1993; 5(2):179–193. DOI: 10.1177/089826439300500202.
crossref
25. Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN. Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:1701–1704.
26. Ko KD, Cho YT, Cho SI, Sung JH, Cho BL, Son KY, et al. Association of health risk behaviors with mental health among elderly Koreans. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2012; 16(2):66–73. DOI: 10.4235/jkgs.2012.16.2.66.
crossref
27. Banjare P, Dwivedi R, Pradhan J. Factors associated with the life satisfaction amongst the rural elderly in Odisha, India. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13(201):1–13. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0398-y.
crossref
28. Levine ME. Introduction to clinical nursing. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis;1969. p. 1–515.
29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2015 OECD health statistics [Internet]. Paris: OECD;2015. cited 2016 September 15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health-data-en.
TOOLS
Similar articles