Antibacterial effect of citrus press-cakes dried by high speed and far-infrared radiation drying methods

Kalpa Samarakoon; Mahinda Senevirathne; Won-Woo Lee; Young-Tae Kim; Jae-Il Kim; Myung-Cheol Oh; You-Jin Jeon

doi:10.4162/nrp.2012.6.3.187

Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.6(3) > 1051211

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Samarakoon, Senevirathne, Lee, Kim, Kim, Oh, and Jeon: Antibacterial effect of citrus press-cakes dried by high speed and far-infrared radiation drying methods

Original Research

Nutrition Research and Practice

Nutrition Research and Practice 2012; 6(3): 187-194.

Published online: 30 June 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2012.6.3.187

Antibacterial effect of citrus press-cakes dried by high speed and far-infrared radiation drying methods

Kalpa Samarakoon¹, Mahinda Senevirathne², Won-Woo Lee¹, Young-Tae Kim³, Jae-Il Kim⁴, Myung-Cheol Oh⁵, You-Jin Jeon¹

¹School of Marine Biomedical Sciences, Jeju National University, 1 Ara-dong, Jeju-si, Jeju 690-756, Korea.

²Marine Bioprocess Research Centre, Pukyoung National University, Busan 608-737, Korea.

³Food Biotechnology Major, Kunsan National University, Jeonbuk 573-701, Korea.

⁴Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Pukyoung National University, Busan 608-737, Korea.

⁵Department of Tourism Hotel Culinary Art, Jeju College of Technology, Jeju 690-140, Korea.

Corresponding Author: You-Jin Jeon, Tel. 82-64-754-3475, Fax. 82-64-756-3493, youjinj@jejunu.ac.kr

Received 1 September 2011 Revised 9 May 2012 Accepted 18 May 2012

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this study, the antibacterial effect was evaluated to determine the benefits of high speed drying (HSD) and far-infrared radiation drying (FIR) compared to the freeze drying (FD) method. Citrus press-cakes (CPCs) are released as a by-product in the citrus processing industry. Previous studies have shown that the HSD and FIR drying methods are much more economical for drying time and mass drying than those of FD, even though FD is the most qualified drying method. The disk diffusion assay was conducted, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined with methanol extracts of the dried CPCs against 11 fish and five food-related pathogenic bacteria. The disk diffusion results indicated that the CPCs dried by HSD, FIR, and FD prevented growth of all tested bacteria almost identically. The MIC and MBC results showed a range from 0.5-8.0 mg/mL and 1.0-16.0 mg/mL respectively. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that the extracts changed the morphology of the bacteria cell wall, leading to destruction. These results suggest that CPCs dried by HSD and FIR showed strong antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria and are more useful drying methods than that of the classic FD method in CPCs utilization.

Keywords: Citrus press-cakes, fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria, high speed drying, far-infrared radiation drying, antibacterial agent

Introduction

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance is a continual problem due to the evolution of a potent defense mechanism against antibiotics [1]. One of the main concerns is spread of various diseases by fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria, which can affect both the aquaculture and agriculture sectors leading to economic losses. Therefore, it is necessary to exploit and develop a novel inhibitory agent against those bacteria. An increasing number of studies have considered plant extracts for immune enhancement and antimicroorganism activities [2,3]. Essential oils as well as ethanol and methanol extracts of plants possess antimicrobial activity [4,5], which can be used as antibacterial agents.

The appearance and development of fish and food-related diseases are the result of the interaction among pathogens, hosts, and the environment. Prophylactic chemo-therapeutants have been commonly used in the fish and food industries for controlling opportunistic bacteria. Hence, nonchemotherapeutic methods for microbial control, such as the use of vaccine, probiotics, immune-stimulants, and natural therapeutics from plants have been considered [6,7].

Finding new naturally active components from plants or plant-based agricultural products has been of interest to many researchers. Hence, a great deal of attraction has been paid to the antibacterial activity of citrus as a potential and promising source of pharmaceutical agents [8-11]. Furthermore, citrus fruit peel has been used in traditional Asian medicines for centuries to treat indigestion and to improve bronchial and asthmatic conditions [12]. Ghasemi et al. [13] and Johann et al. [14] have shown that citrus varieties are considered and containing a rich source of secondary metabolites with the ability to produce a broad spectrum of biological activities. Yao et al. [15] reported that seven individual polymethoxylated flavones can be obtained from Citrus sinensis peel. Moreover, different parts of Citrus reticulate (peel, pith, endocarp, pulp, and seeds) have been used to identify five kinds of flavonoids, including hesperidin, naringin, didymin, tangeretin and nobiletin by high performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array [16]. In addition, shoots of germinated citron seeds (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) have significant antioxidant and antilipidemic activities due to their high content of flavonoids in methanol extracts [17]. Some significant components are abundantly available in citrus peel, including ascorbic acid, phenolic acids, polyphenols, and dietary fiber [18]. Constituents with antioxidant, antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer activities have also been reported in citrus [19-21]. Numerous studies have described the inhibitory activities of citrus against human pathogens, fungi, and yeasts. However, only a few studies have reported on the antibacterial effects against fish [22] and food pathogens [23].

Our previous studies have revealed that citrus by-products (CBPs) from citrus peel, which are comprised of flavonoid compounds, might be a useful antimicrobial agent [24,25]. Senevirathne et al. [26] have shown that enzymatic digests from CBPs dried by high speed drying (HSD) or freeze drying (FD) are responsible for the antioxidant properties in the in vitro assays conducted. In addition, citrus essential oils, including citrullene and limonene from CBPs have antimicrobial effects against a broad range of microorganisms [27]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the antibacterial activity of a dried CPC methanol extract by HSD and far-infrared radiation drying (FIR) against pathogenic bacteria by comparing the results with those of FD dried CPC. We used 11 fish and five food-related pathogenic bacteria to evaluate the effectiveness of the HSD and FIR drying systems compared to that of the qualified FD method using maximum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques in accordance with the antibacterial activity of dried CPCs, and to describe the alternative beneficial value of processing and utilizing CPCs.

Materials and Methods

Material and chemicals

CPCs were obtained from Jeju Provincial Development Co. in Korea. Nutrient agar (NA), nutrient broth (NB), brain heart infusion agar (BHIA) and brain heart infusion (BHI) were purchased from Difco (Sparks, MD, USA). Authentic reference compounds, including narirutin, quercetagetin, sinesetin, 3',4',7,8-tetramethoxyflavone, 5,6,7,3',4',5'-hexamethoxyflavone, and scutelarin tetramethyl ether were purchased from Extrasynthase (Genay, France). Hesperidin and neohesperidin were purchased from Sigma Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nobiletin and tangeritin were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan), and 3,5,6,7,8,3'4', heptamethoxyflavone was provided by the Pharmacy Department of Tokyo University. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Microorganisms and culture

Fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria were kindly provided by the Marine Microbes Laboratory at Jeju National University, Korea. The bacterial strains were cultured at an appropriate temperature as given in Table 1. The optical densities of each working culture were adjusted to 0.1 mg/mL at 625 nm using fresh broth to give standard inoculums of 1 × 10⁶ colony-forming units (cfu) per mL.

HSD or FIR of CPCs

CPCs stored at -50℃ were converted to a dried form by HSD (Okadora, Incheon, Korea) or FIR drying (TOURI-Q, Seoul, Korea) as explained in our previous studies [24,28]. Then, the dried CPCs were pulverized into fine powder using a grinder (MF 10 basic mill, GMBH & Co., Staufen, Germany) and passed through a 300 mm standard testing sieve (no. 50).

Extraction of bioactive compounds from dried CPC

A 20 gram portion of the ground dried CPC powder was mixed with 100% methanol and kept in a shaking incubator at 25℃ for 1 day, and then it was filtered in a vacuum using Whatman no. 1 (Whatman Ltd., Maidenstone, England) filter paper. The methanol was evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and the extracts were dissolved in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Disc diffusion assay

The CPC extract was screened for antibacterial activity against 16 bacterial strains using agar diffusion technique [29,30]. The bacterial strains were grown in nutrient agar (NA) and brain heart infusion agar (BHIA) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). Sterilized paper disks (Whatman no. 1, 6 mm diameter) containing 50 µL of each extract were applied to the surface of agar plates that were previously seeded by spreading 0.1 mL of culture overnight. Ampicillin and 1% DMSO was used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The plates were incubated overnight at respective temperatures, and the diameter of the clear zone was measured in millimeters. The measurement scale was the following: > 20 mm clear zone was strong inhibitory activity; < 12-20 mm clear zone was moderate/mild inhibitory activity; and < 12 mm was low inhibitory activity.

Determination of MIC

MIC was defined as the minimum concentration of the test extract that was required to limit turbidity (growth) to < 0.05 absorbance units. The MICs of the extracts from the dried CPCs were assessed by a modified microdilution broth method described by Cai and Wu [31]. Briefly, bacteria from overnight cultures were adjusted to 1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL. The extracts were serially diluted with broth to give concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 mg/mL. A 100 µL aliquot of the diluted extracts was added to wells containing 100 µL of bacterial suspension. A parallel series of uninoculated broth samples were used as blanks. After 24 h incubation at an appropriate temperature under anaerobic conditions, optical density was measured at 600 nm using a microtiter plate reader (Tecan, Vienna, Austria).

Determination of MBC

The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of the extract that allowed < 0.1% of the original inoculum treated with the extracts to survive and grow on the surface of the medium used. A method described by Patrick [32] in the ASM Pocket Guide to Clinical Microbiology was slightly modified to determine MBC in this study. Briefly, a 50 µL aliquot of the mixture was withdrawn from the MIC assay wells where no visible turbidity (growth) was observed and spread on freshly prepared BHIA/NA plates. The plates were incubated at an appropriate temperature for 24 h to determine the MBC.

SEM observations

Bacterial cells were suspended in NA or BHI broth and incubated overnight at 37℃ or 30℃ respectively. Both suspensions were divided equally into four tubes accordingly. The extracts from the dried CPCs (8 mg/mL) were added to the tubes and incubated at 30℃ for 4 h. One tube was used as a control for each (no extract). Later, bacterial cells were harvested and prefixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution at 4℃ overnight followed by resuspension in 0.1 M Na-cacodylate buffer. The mixture was dehydrated rapidly in an ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100%). Then, bacterial cells were dried with liquid CO2 at "critical point" (Balzers CPD 030) under 95 bars of pressure and gold-covered by cathodic spraying (Edwards S 150 B). Finally, bacterial cell morphology was observed by SEM (JEOL, JSM 6700F, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate (n = 3) and an analysis of variance (using SPSS 11.5 statistical software, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to compare the mean values of each treatment. Significant differences among the means of parameters were determined using Duncan's test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Growth inhibitory activity

Eleven fish pathogenic bacteria (nine Gram-negative and two Gram-positive) and five food-related pathogenic bacteria (two Gram-negative and three Gram-positive) were tested for their sensitivity against methanol extracts from CPCs prepared using different drying methods. Antibacterial potency was initially determined by the disc diffusion assay. Table 2 presents the inhibition zone diameters (clear zones around discs) formed by the various extracts against the bacteria. The CPC extracts dried by HSD or FIR showed strong inhibitory activity against fish pathogenic bacteria strains, as > 21 mm clear zones were observed with respect to Streptococcus iniae, Vibrio ichioenteri, and S. parauberis. In addition, those extracts showed higher inhibitory activities against other fish and food-related bacterial strains, and the activities were almost the same as with the CPC extract dried by FD (inhibition zone, 9-20 mm). The inhibition zones were very prominent when compared with that of ampicillin, which is a commercial antimicrobial agent (positive control). Vibrio salmonicida was more susceptible to the extracts and showed the smallest inhibition zones (9-11 mm). However, the methanol extracts from CPCs dried by HSD or FIR showed antibacterial activity in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

Susceptibility test

A quantitative evaluation of the antibacterial activity of the extracts from the dried CPCs was carried out against selected bacteria according to the method described by Cai and Wu [31]. The MICs of the extracts to the fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria are shown in Table 3. The MIC values were 2-8 mg/mL for the fish pathogenic bacteria and both extracts from CPCs dried by HSD or FIR showed strong activities against S. iniae, V. anguilarum, S. parauberis, and V. parahemolyticus. These values were almost the same as those of CPC extracts dried by FD. Furthermore, all extracts showed moderate MIC values against the V. alginolyticus and V. ichyienter strains tested. In contrast to the food-related pathogenic bacteria, MIC values were 0.5-8 mg/mL. Strong activity was evident against L. monocytogens, S. aureus, and Bacillus subtilis at 0.5-2 mg/mL, which was significant. These values were also the same as those of the HSD and FIR extracts from dried CPCs with the extract from CPCs dried by FD. All extracts showed moderate MIC values against Salmonella thyphimurium and E. coli. The MBC results against fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria are shown in Table 4. The MBC results were 1-16 mg/mL. In contrast to the food-related pathogenic bacteria, strong inhibitory activities were shown against Listeria monocytogens and S. aureus at 1-4 mg/mL. Moreover, moderate MBC values were exhibited at 4-16 mg/mL against all other tested fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria. These MBC values were the same for all extracts dried by HSD and FIR compared to that of those dried by FD. Therefore, these results further confirmed the potential activities of the CPC extracts.

SEM observations

The CPC extracts dried by HSD, FIR, and FD were added to S. iniea and B. subtilis bacteria strains and observed by SEM (Figs. 1 and 2 respectively). The SEM results suggested that the CPC extracts caused morphological changes in the surface of the treated bacteria compared to those of the control. Untreated bacterial cells (control) remained intact and showed a smooth surface, whereas the treated bacterial cells showed damage or distinctive changes in cell membranes.

Discussion

Efficient, fast, and economically reliable drying methods were used to prepare HSD and FIR extracts from CPCs and was compared with that of FD in our previous studies [24,25]. Furthermore, total flavonoid contents in the methanol extracts from the CPCs, dried by HSD, FIR, and FD were determined to be 477.4 mg/100 g, 463 mg/100 g, and 624 mg/100 g, respectively. All extracts from dried CPCs had hesperidin and narirutin in large quantities as compared to other flavonoids [24,25]. We focused on the antibacterial activity of some of the different flavonoid compounds found in the extracts (Table 5). Hence, the antibacterial activities shown in this study might be due to the presence of a variety of flavonoid or phenolic compounds. The synergistic effects of those flavonoids may have resulted in higher antibacterial activities, and they are thermostable, as they showed activity even after being dried at very high temperatures during HSD compared to those of FIR. However, the FIR drying process is shorter drying time than that of FD [26]. Moreover, differences in the activities of the CPC extracts could be partially explained by variations in flavonoid content and strain sensitivity. Yi et al. [9] showed that hesperidin is more active against bacterial growth than that of polymethoxylated flavones such as tangeritin and nobiletin, whereas various flavanones such as hesperitin and naringenin are active against Helicobactor pylori [33]. The antimicrobial activity of purified flavonoids has also been described [34].

The reason for the lower sensitivity of the Gram-negative bacteria compared to that of Gram-positive bacteria could be due to differences in their cell wall composition. Gram-positive bacteria contain an outer peptidoglycan layer, which is an effective permeability barrier [35], whereas Gram-negative bacteria have an outer phospholipidic membrane that makes the cell wall impermeable to lipophollic solutes, and porins act as a selective barrier to hydrophilic solutes [36].

The SEM results showed that the active components of the extracts destroyed the bacterial cell walls and changed their morphology. Several mechanisms are responsible for those changes. The phospholipid bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane in the bacterial cell wall may be sensitized and inhibit membrane-bound enzymes by the biologically active compounds in the CPC crude extracts. In fact, those bind to the surface of bacterial cells, preventing target points, and changing biochemical processes in the bacterial cells. These processes may lead to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, restraints from on active transport, reductions in metabolites, and disruption of nucleic acid, protein, lipid, and polysaccharide synthesis [37-39]. The bacterial cells loses its structural integrity, and membrane permeability due to the damage to the cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane [40]. This has been shown in many cases with an increase in altered membrane fluidity in the hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions. Therefore, a reduction in membrane fluidity of bacterial cells may have led to the reduced number of CFUs in the viable counts [41]. In addition, perturbing the lipid bilayer by membrane fusion by leakage of intramembranous materials, including ions, ATP, nucleic acid, and amino acids that cause aggregation, may have led to a disruption in activity [42,43].

There may be a relationship between antibacterial activity and the chemical structures of the major phenolic compounds in the extracts [44]. However, the different groups of phytochemicals may target different components and functions of bacterial cells [45]. The inhibitory action on DNA and RNA synthesis could be affected by creating a hydrogen bond with the B ring of flavonoids [46]. Moreover, inhibiting the enzyme's ATPase activity which is related to DNA gyrase, has been coupled in cases of antibacterial activity [47].

In conclusion, we showed that the major active components from dried CPCs possessed significant in vitro antibacterial properties against 11 fish and five food-related pathogenic bacteria. CPCs as a citrus peel by-product from the citrus processing industry can be recovered as a value-added source. The HSD and FIR drying systems were confirmed as economical and time effective alternative techniques compared to the qualified FD technique. Taken together, our results demonstrate that drying CPCs by HSD and FIR could provide beneficial antibacterial components for the fish and food preservative industries. However, further studies on improving food safety by controlling or eliminating these pathogenic bacteria is needed for future prospective applications.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Scanning electron micrographs of Streptococcus iniae treated with the dried citrus press-cake (CPCs) extracts. A, Negative control; B, treated with 8 mg/mL CPC extract dried by high speed drying (HSD); C, treated with 8 mg/mL CPC extract dried by far-infrared radiation drying (FIR) at 50℃; D, treated 8 mg/mL CPC extract dried by freeze drying (FD)

Fig. 2

Scanning electron micrographs of Bacillus subtilis treated (8 mg/mL) with the dried citrus press-cake (CPC) extracts. A, Negative control; B, treated with 8 mg/mL extract from CPCs dried by high speed drying (HSD); C, treated 8 mg/mL extract from CPCs dried by far-infrared radiation drying at 50℃; D, treated 8 mg/mL extract from CPCs dried by freeze drying (FD)

Table 1

Fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria used in this study

Appropriate temperatures used to culture each fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria and adjusted standard inoculums to 1 × 10⁶ (CFU)/mL.

Table 2

Growth inhibition zones (mm) showing antibacterial activity of the dried citrus press-cakes (CPCs) against fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria

Diameter of inhibition zone includes the disc diameter of 6 mm.

¹⁾The concentration of the extract and ampicillin was 10 mg/disc and 2 mg/disc, respectively. All data are means of three determinations. Significant differences at P < 0.05 indicated with different letters along the row.

FD, freeze dried; HSD, high speed dried; FIR-40, FIR-50, FIR-60, FIR-70, FIR-80, far-infrared radiation dried at 40℃, 50℃, 60℃, 70℃, and 80℃ temperatures, respectively.

Table 3

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of methanol extracts from dried citrus press-cakes (CPCs) against fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria

¹⁾Concentrations of ampicillin are given in µg/mL. Significant differences at P < 0.05 are indicated with different letters along the row.

FD, freeze dried; HSD, high speed dried; FIR-40, FIR-50, FIR-60, FIR-70, FIR-80, far-infrared radiation dried at 40℃, 50℃, 60℃, 70℃, and 80℃ temperatures, respectively.

Table 4

Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of methanol extracts from dried citrus press-cakes (CPCs) against fish and food-related pathogenic bacteria

¹⁾Concentrations of ampicillin are given in µg/mL. Significant differences at P < 0.05 are indicated with different letters along the row.

FD, freeze dried; HSD, high speed dried; FIR-40, FIR-50, FIR-60, FIR-70, FIR-80, far-infrared radiation dried at 40℃, 50℃, 60℃, 70℃, and 80℃ temperatures, respectively.

Table 5

Flavanone glycosides; A and polymethoxylated flavones; B found in the extracts from citrus press-cakes prepared by high speed drying (HSD) or far infrared drying (FIR).

Notes

This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Research and Development for Regional Industry.

References

1. Cabello FC. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ Microbiol. 2006. 8:1137–1144.

2. Alzoreky NS, Nakahara K. Antibacterial activity of extracts from some edible plants commonly consumed in Asia. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003. 80:223–230.

3. Kim JS, Kim Y. The inhibitory effect of natural bioactives on the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Nutr Res Pract. 2007. 1:273–278.

4. Dorman HJ, Deans SG. Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J Appl Microbiol. 2000. 88:308–316.

5. Abu-Shanab B, Adwan G, Abu-Safiya D, Jarrar N, Adwan K. Antibacterial activities of some plant extracts utilized in popular medicine in Palestine. Turk J Biol. 2004. 28:99–102.

6. Sakai M. Current research status of fish immunostimulants. Aquaculture. 1999. 172:63–92.

7. Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000. 64:655–671.

8. Ortuño A, Báidez A, Gómez P, Arcas MC, Porras I, García-Lidón A, Del Río JA. Citrus paradisi and Citrus sinensis Flavonoids: Their influence in the defence mechanism against Penicillium digitatum. Food Chem. 2006. 98:351–358.

9. Yi ZB, Yu Y, Liang YZ, Zeng B. In vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the extract of Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae of a new Citrus cultivar and its main flavonoids. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 2007. 41:597–603.

10. Jo C, Park BJ, Chung SH, Kim CB, Cha BS, Byun MW. Antibacterial and anti-fungal activity of citrus (Citrus unshiu) essential oil extracted from peel by-products. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2004. 13:384–386.

11. Kitzberger CS, Smânia A Jr, Pedrosa RC, Ferreira SR. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of shiitake (Lentinula edodes) extracts obtained by organic solvents and supercritical fluids. J Food Eng. 2007. 80:631–638.

12. Huang B, Aung SK, Wang Y. Thousand Formulas and Thousand Herbs of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 1993. vol. 1. Harbin: Heilongjiang Education Press.

13. Ghasemi K, Ghasemi Y, Ebrahimzadeh MA. Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2009. 22:277–281.

14. Johann S, Oliveira VL, Pizzolatti MG, Schripsema J, Braz-Filho R, Branco A, Smânia A Jr. Antimicrobial activity of wax and hexane extracts from Citrus spp. peels. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007. 102:681–685.

15. Yao X, Pan S, Duan C, Yang F, Fan G, Zhu X, Yang S, Xu X. Polymethoxylated flavone extracts from citrus peel for use in the functional food and nutraceutical industry. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2009. 18:1237–1242.

16. Sun Y, Wang J, Gu S, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Simultaneous determination of flavonoids in different parts of Citrus reticulata 'Chachi' fruit by high performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detection. Molecules. 2010. 15:5378–5388.

17. Choi I, Choi S, Ji J. Flavonoids and functional properties of germinated citron (Citrus junos Sieb. ex TANAKA) shoots. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2009. 18:1224–1229.

18. Gorinstein S, Martín-Belloso O, Park YS, Haruenkit R, Lojek A, Ĉíž M, Caspi A, Libman I, Trakhtenberg S. Comparison of some biochemical characteristics of different citrus fruits. Food Chem. 2001. 74:309–315.

19. Mahmud S, Saleem M, Siddique S, Ahmed R, Khanum R, Perveen Z. Volatile components, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Citrus acida var. sour lime peel oil. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2009. 13:195–198.

20. Matasyoh JC, Kiplimo JJ, Karubiu NM, Hailstorks TP. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Tarchonanthus camphorates. Food Chem. 2007. 101:1183–1187.

21. Zhang M, Zhang JP, Ji HT, Wang JS, Qian DH. Effect of six flavonoids on proliferation of hepatic stellate cells in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2000. 21:253–256.

22. Lee SW, Najiah M. Antimicrobial property of 2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-Tricarboxylic acid isolated from Citrus microcarpa extract. Agric Sci China. 2009. 8:880–886.

23. Nannapaneni R, Muthaiyan A, Crandall PG, Johnson MG, O'Bryan CA, Chalova VI, Callaway TR, Carroll JA, Arthington JD, Nisbet DJ, Ricke SC. Antimicrobial activity of commercial citrus-based natural extracts against Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates and mutant strains. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2008. 5:695–699.

24. Senevirathne M, Jeon YJ, Ha JH, Kim SH. Effective drying of citrus by-product by high speed drying: A novel drying technique and their antioxidant activity. J Food Eng. 2009. 92:157–163.

25. Senevirathne M, Kim SH, Kim YD, Oh CK, Oh MC, Ahn CB, Je JY, Lee WW, Jeon YJ. Effect of far-infrared radiation drying of citrus press-cakes on free radical scavenging and antioxidant activities. J Food Eng. 2010. 97:168–176.

26. Senevirathne M, Kim SH, Um BH, Lee JS, Ha JH, Lee WW, Jeon YJ. Effect of high speed drying on antioxidant properties of enzymatic digests from citrus by-products and their protective effect on DNA damage induced by H₂O₂. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2009. 18:672–681.

27. Callaway TR, Carroll JA, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Collier CT, Nisbet DJ. Watson R, Gerald JL, Preedy VR, editors. Citrus products and their use against bacteria: Potential health and cost benefits. Nutrients, Dietary Supplements, and Nutriceutical: Cost Analysis Versus Clinical Benefits. 2011. New York: Humana press;277–286.

28. Senevirathne M, Jeon YJ, Ha JH, Kim SH. Effect of far-infrared radiation for dying citrus by-products and their radical scavenging activities and protective effects against H₂O₂ - induced DNA damage. J Food Sci Nutr. 2008. 13:313–320.

29. Meena MR, Sethi V. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils from spices. J Food Sci Technol. 1994. 31:68–70.

30. Rota C, Carramiñana JJ, Burillo J, Herrera A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants against selected foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot. 2004. 67:1252–1256.

31. Cai L, Wu CD. Compounds from Syzygium aromaticum possessing growth inhibitory activity against oral pathogens. J Nat Prod. 1996. 59:987–990.

32. Patrick R. Antimicrobial Agents and Susceptibility Testing. 1996. Washington, DC: Murray.

33. Bae EA, Han MJ, Kim DH. In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of some flavonoids and their metabolites. Planta Med. 1999. 65:442–443.

34. Taguri T, Tanaka T, Kouno I. Antimicrobial activity of 10 different plant polyphenols against bacteria causing food-borne disease. Biol Pharm Bull. 2004. 27:1965–1969.

35. Scherrer R, Gerhardt P. Molecular sieving by the Bacillus megaterium cell wall and protoplast. J Bacteriol. 1971. 107:718–735.

36. Nikaido H, Vaara M. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol Rev. 1985. 49:1–32.

37. Denyer SP, Hugo WB. Denyer SP, Hugo WB, editors. Mechanisms of antibacterial action - a summary. Mechanisms of Action of Chemical Biocides. 1991. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications;331–334.

38. Kim YS, Kim HH, Yoo MJ, Shin DH. Bactericidal effect of the extracts of Polygonum cuspidatum on Bacillus cereus. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2004. 13:430–433.

39. Nychas GJE. Gould GW, editor. Natural antimicrobials from plants. New Methods of Food Preservation. 1995. London: Blackie Academic and Professional;58–89.

40. de Billerbeck VG, Roques CG, Bessière JM, Fonvieille JL, Dargent R. Effects of Cymbopogon nardus (L.) W. Watson essential oil on the growth and morphogenesis of Aspergillus niger. Can J Microbiol. 2001. 47:9–17.

41. Tsuchiya H, Iinuma M. Reduction of membrane fluidity by antibacterial sophoraflavanone G isolated from Sophora exigua. Phytomedicine. 2000. 7:161–165.

42. Ikigai H, Nakae T, Hara Y, Shimamura T. Bactericidal catechins damage the lipid bilayer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993. 1147:132–136.

43. Ultee A, Bennik MH, Moezelaar R. The phenolic hydroxyl group of carvacrol is essential for action against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002. 68:1561–1568.

44. Beuchat LR, Golden DA. Antimicrobials occurring naturally in foods. Food Technol. 1989. 43:134–142.

45. Haraguchi H, Tanimoto K, Tamura Y, Mizutani K, Kinoshita T. Mode of antibacterial action of retrochalcones from Glycyrrhiza inflata. Phytochemistry. 1998. 48:125–129.

46. Mori A, Nishino C, Enoki N, Tawata S. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of plant flavonoids against Proteus vulgaris and Staphylococcus aureus. Phytochemistry. 1998. 26:2231–2234.

47. Ohemeng KA, Schwender CF, Fu KP, Barrett JF. DNA gyrase inhibitory and antibacterial activity of some flavones (1). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1993. 3:225–230.

TOOLS

Similar articles