Eun-Ju Lee; Seung-Yeon Oh; Mi-Kyung Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son; Mi-Kyung Sung

doi:10.4162/nrp.2009.3.3.185

Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.3(3) > 1051014

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Oh, Kim, Ahn, Son, and Sung: Modulatory effects of α- and γ-tocopherols on 4-hydroxyestradiol induced oxidative stresses in MCF-10A breast epithelial cells

Original Research

Nutrition Research and Practice

Nutrition Research and Practice 2009; 3(3): 185-191.

Published online: 30 September 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2009.3.3.185

Modulatory effects of α- and γ-tocopherols on 4-hydroxyestradiol induced oxidative stresses in MCF-10A breast epithelial cells

Eun-Ju Lee¹, Seung-Yeon Oh¹, Mi-Kyung Kim², Sei Hyun Ahn³, Byung Ho Son³, Mi-Kyung Sung¹

¹Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, 52 Hyochangwon-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 140-742, Korea.

²National Cancer Center Institute, 111 Jungbalsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi 410-769, Korea.

³Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-2 dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Mi-Kyung Sung, Tel. 82-2-710-9395, Fax. 82-2-710-9453, mksung@sm.ac.kr

Received 1 July 2009 Revised 10 September 2009 Accepted 16 September 2009

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The elevated level of circulating estradiol increases the risk of breast tumor development. To gain further insight into mechanisms involved in their actions, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) to initiate and/or promote abnormal cell growth, and of α- or γ-tocopherol to inhibit this process. MCF-10A, human breast epithelial cells were incubated with 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂, either with or without 30 µM tocopherols for 96 h. 4-OHE₂ caused the accumulation of intracellular ROS, while cellular GSH/GSSG ratio and MnSOD protein levels were decreased, indicating that there was an oxidative burden. 4-OHE₂ treatment also changed the levels of DNA repair proteins, BRCA1 and PARP-1. γ-Tocopherol suppressed the 4-OHE₂-induced increases in ROS, GSH/GSSG ratio, and MnSOD protein expression, while α-tocopherol up-regulated BRCA1 and PARP-1 protein expression. In conclusion, 4-OHE₂ increases oxidative stress reducing the level of proteins related to DNA repair. Tocopherols suppressed oxidative stress by scavenging ROS or up-regulating DNA repair elements.

Keywords: Breast cancer, DNA damage, 4-hydroxyestradiol, oxidative stress, tocopherol

Introduction

The etiology of breast cancer is related to multiple factors, a significant one of which is estrogen exposure (Colditz, 1998; Grodstein et al., 1997; Service, 1998). 4-Hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) is hydroxylated metabolite of 17β-estradiol formed by CYP1B1. This catechol estradiol is further oxidized by sequential one-electron oxidations to produce the estrogen semiquinone radical and estrogen quinone. In rodent models, estrogens have been shown to act as carcinogens through a mechanism that involves oxidative stress in various tissues including kidney, liver, and breast (Han & Liehr, 1994; Harvell et al., 2000; Yager & Liehr, 1996).

Several cellular defense molecules including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione (GSH) protect cells from oxidative damage. Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) catalyzes the conversion of superoxide to hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria. It has been demonstrated that MnSOD levels are lowered in certain cancer cells (Hitchler et al., 2006), while other studies have shown that the stimulated expression of MnSOD suppresses malignant phenotypes in mammalian tumor cells, including breast (Li et al., 1998), prostate (Liu et al., 1997), and oral carcinoma cells (Liu et al., 1998). The GSH/GSSG ratio is tightly regulated under normal circumstances, while the balance shifts towards a low GSH/GSSG ratio under conditions of oxidative stress. The ratio of GSH/GSSG measured in the blood of patients with colon and breast cancer has been found to be significantly decreased compared to that of control subjects (Pastore et al., 2003).

Several proteins are involved in oxidative DNA damage repair, and therefore genetic defects in these proteins increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), for example, regulates cell cycle progression and DNA damage repair, and maintains genomic integrity (Rosen et al., 2003). In addition, BRCA1 stimulates antioxidant response element-driven transcriptional activity and shifts the cellular redox balance to a higher ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (Bae et al., 2004). Inherited mutations or deficiencies in BRCA1 predispose its carriers to higher risks of breast and ovarian cancers (King et al., 2003; Walsh et al., 2007). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), a nuclear member of the PARP superfamily, binds rapidly to DNA single and double strand breaks where its activation facilitates DNA repair (Ame et al., 2004). In addition, PARP-1 is essential for the regulation of BRCA1 in response to DNA damage (Tong et al., 2007). PARP-1 complementation partly rescues defective DNA damage response resulting from defective BRCA1. Hence, BRCA1 and PARP-1 are thought to respond to cellular oxidative stress including exposure to the oxidized estradiol metabolites.

Cancer patients have been shown to have low concentrations of tissue and plasma tocopherols compared to their healthy counterparts (Abiaka et al., 2001; Goodman et al., 2003; McMillan et al., 2002). The functions of tocopherols in scavenging lipid peroxyl radicals in biological membranes are well documented (Baba et al., 2005). A recent report has demonstrated that tocopherols can also directly suppress ROS production by interfering with the assembly of membrane-bound NADPH-oxidase complexes (Wittmann et al., 2005). Tocopherols also regulate the expression of genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis in an antioxidant-independent way (Campbell et al., 2003; Campbell et al., 2006; Gysin et al., 2002; Roy et al., 2002).

In this study, we hypothesized that continuous exposure of normal breast epithelial cells to 4-OHE₂ increases oxidative stress and disrupts redox balance thereby altering the availability of repair elements. Effects of α- or γ-tocopherol on the markers of oxidative stress and the expression of DNA repair elements were also examined.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise. Cholera toxin was obtained from List Laboratories (Campbell, CA, USA). Culture media, epidermal growth factor, penicillin-streptomycin, horse serum and glutamine were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Anti-MnSOD, BRCA1, and HRP-conjugated secondary antibody were obtained from Upstate (Lake Placid, NY, USA). The glutathione assay kit was obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). PRO-PREP™ was purchased from iNtRON Biotechnology (Daejeon, Korea). The Bradford protein assay kit was purchased from BioRad laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA).

Cell culture

Human mammary epithelial cells (MCF-10A) obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10 µg/ml bovine insulin, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 20 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 5% horse serum at 37℃ in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. The non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cell line was originally derived from a patient with proliferative breast disease (Cuendet & Bolton, 2006).

Cell treatment

MCF-10A cells were incubated with 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂, either with or without 30 µM tocopherol for 24 to 96 h. 4-OHE₂ and tocopherols were replaced every day during the incubation period.

Measurement of intracellular ROS accumulation

MCF-10A cells were washed and treated for 20 min with 100 µM 2', 7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), a nonfluoroscent probe that diffuses into cells. Cytoplasmic esterase hydrolyzes DCFH-DA to 2', 7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH) and then ROS generated within cells oxidize DCFH to the fluorescent dye, 2', 7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF). The intensity of DCF was measured by a flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, Becton Dickinson, USA) at 530 nm using an FL1 filter.

Measurement of GSH/GSSG ratios

MCF-10A cells were collected by centrifugation at 1000×g for 5 min at 4℃. The cell pellet was sonicated in 1 mL PBS (pH 7.2) and centrifuged at 13,000×g for 20 min. Total GSH and GSSG were measured using a glutathione assay kit. The GSH disulfide (GSSG) content of cells was determined by adding 10 µL 2-vinylpyridine solution per mL of sample in order to remove GSH according to the method described by Griffith (1980).

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with PBS (pH 7.2) and the pellets were collected. The pellets were extracted using the PRO-PREP™ and protein concentration was determined. Protein (30 µg) was added to each well of 10-12% SDS-PAGE. The gel was run at 100 V, 250 mA and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 80 min. The membrane was blocked in blocking buffer (0.2% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.2), containing 5% non-fat dry milk for 2 h at room temperature. Dilution of primary antibodies (MnSOD 1:2000, BRCA1 1:250, PARP-1 1:500) was made in blocking buffer. The blots were incubated with primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Following three washes with 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.2 (PBST), the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were then washed three times with PBST, and developed with ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 1 min. Band intensity was measured by Versa Doc 5000 (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Differences in 4-OHE₂ treated and non-treated group were analyzed by Student's t-test. Comparisons among the treatments were tested by ANOVA followed Duncan's multiple range test. All statistical tests were performed using the SAS statistical package Version 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Changes in oxidative stress markers

Following the exposure of cells to 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 96 h, intracellular ROS was increased by 60% (Fig. 1A). Cellular GSH/GSSG ratios were increased at 24 h and then decreased at 48 and 96 h (Fig. 1B). The expression of MnSOD, a key antioxidant enzyme involved in scavenging oxygen radicals was significantly decreased at 72 h and 96 h (Fig. 1C).

Changes in oxidative stress-related DNA damage response proteins

DNA damage response elements including BRCA1 and PARP-1 are closely related to the regulation of oxidative stress in breast cancer. As shown in Fig. 2A, BRCA1 protein levels were significantly suppressed at 48 h, while longer exposure (72 h) to 4-OHE₂ restored the level. Fig. 2B shows a significant decrease in PARP-1 level at 48 h when cells were treated with 4-OHE₂ treatment, while a considerable increase was observed at 72 h exposure.

Effects of tocopherols on modulating oxidative stress

Cells treated with 30 µM γ-tocopherol showed a decreased level of intracellular ROS (Fig. 3A). γ-Tocopherol increased the GSH/GSSG ratio by reducing the level of GSSG (Fig. 3B). MnSOD protein level was increased with γ-tocopherol treatment (Fig. 3C). Although α-tocopherol did not exert a significant effect on these markers, it inhibited 4-OHE₂-induced BRCA1 and PARP-1 depletion (Fig. 4A, 4B).

Discussion

Carcinogenesis can be viewed as a stepwise process beginning with genotoxic events followed by enhanced cell proliferation and tumor progression. Evidence has accumulated supporting the theory that catechol estrogens are oxidized to quinones accompanied by the generation of ROS, capable of causing genotoxicity and tumorigenicity. Despite the importance of this process, a limited number of studies have attempted to evaluate oxidized estrogen as a possible compound affecting redox balance in the cellular environment and the possible effects of antioxidant intervention. Therefore, we investigated the molecular events involved in 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂)-induced oxidative stresses as a possible events in cancer initiation process using normal breast epithelial cells. Protective roles of tocopherols were also determined.

In the present study, ROS levels, GSH/GSSG ratios, and manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) protein levels were measured as indicators of oxidative stress in normal breast epithelial cells treated with 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂, which is close to the physiological concentration in breast tissue. Changes in ROS level and the GSSG/GSH ratio indicate that intracellular ROS production caused by 4-OHE₂ was possibly alleviated by GSH. In addition, reactive quinone formed from 4-OHE₂ can produce a conjugate with GSH causing depletion of cellular thiol levels, which renders the cells vulnerable to oxidative damage. Since H₂O₂-detoxifying enzymes were poorly expressed in breast cancer cells (Esworthy et al., 1995), ROS accumulation may exert a greater effect in breast tumor development. We observed the restoration of GSH/GSSG balance in cells treated for 72 h. Cellular exposure to xenobiotics also results in a temporal increase in the total intracellular GSH content (Arrigo, 1999) indicating that cellular redox shift may stimulate GSH biosynthesis to overcome a redox shift, thereby stimulating GSH biosynthesis. Our study showed that MnSOD protein expression was decreased when cells were exposed to 4-OHE₂ for more than 72 h, suggesting MnSOD protein expression is responsive to increased ROS levels caused by 4-OHE₂ exposure. The decrease in MnSOD levels also leads to the accumulation of the superoxide anion (O₂^•) possibly inducing further oxidative damage.

BRCA1 and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) are established as DNA repair elements especially in breast tissue (Ginestier et al., 2009). Previous studies have reported that genetic polymorphisms in these genes are closely related to the increased risk of breast cancer (King et al., 2003; Lane, 1992; Malkin et al., 1990), indicating the functional importance of these genes in breast cancer development. It has been reported that estradiol and its metabolites induce mutation of chromosome 17 which contains the BRCA1 genes in human breast epithelial cells (Fernandez et al., 2006). Deficiency of BRCA1 and PARP-1 results in the accumulation of DNA strand breaks by impairing DNA damage repair, and causing defects in cell cycle checkpoints, centrosome amplification, and genetic instability (Brodie & Deng, 2001; Cantor & Andreassen, 2006; Deng & Wang, 2003; Venkitaraman, 2002; Zhang & Powell, 2005), which eventually result in tumorigenesis. Even though the effect was a transient, 4-OHE₂ significantly decreased BRCA1 and PARP-1 protein expression. Since BRCA1 regulates the activity of nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NFE2L2), an antioxidant response transcription factor, and is required for the repair of oxidative 8-oxoguanine lesions by transcription-coupled DNA repair (Bae et al., 2004), BRCA1 depletion by 4-OHE₂ possibly accelerates carcinogenesis through inhibition of DNA damage repair and antioxidant enzyme expression.

Besides generating ROS during redox cycling, 4-OHE₂ reacts with DNA to form covalently bound adducts such as 4-OHE₂-N7-Gua and 4-OHE₂-N3-Ade (Belous et al., 2007). ROS-induced oxidized bases are predominantly repaired via the base excision repair process (BER). It is generally believed that the repair of DNA single and double stranded breaks in mammalian cells is initiated by PAPR-1 (de Murcia & Ménissier de Murcia, 1994; Plummer, 2006). Moreover, PARP-1 has a functional domain that includes the BRCA1 C-terminal domain (Plummer, 2006), and therefore PARP-1 deficiency impairs BRCA1 recruitment to the site of DNA damage (De Soto & Deng, 2006), which may facilitate cancer development. A reduction in PARP-1 protein expression and an increase in its activity at 48 and 96 h were possibly accompanied by 4-OHE₂-induced ROS production. Chen et al. (2005) also showed that treatment with 4-OHE₂ at 25 µM for 24 h causes PARP-1 cleavage. Depletion of both PARP-1 and BRCA1 at 48 h can therefore cause an overload of 4-OHE₂ induced DNA damage.

Since exogenous antioxidants may regulate 4-OHE₂-induced cellular oxidative stress, we next evaluated the effects of tocopherols on oxidative stress markers and DNA repair protein expression. In these experiments, we used tocopherols at 30 µM which falls within the normal range of blood level in human. For measurement of oxidative stress markers, 4-OHE₂ and/or tocopherols were treated for 96 h, because our pretests indicated that the disturbance of antioxidatve system was induced within 96 h. Study results indicated that in 4-OHE₂ treated MCF-10A cells, the accumulation of intracellular ROS and depletion of GSH and MnSOD were significantly attenuated by γ-tocopherol. The antioxidant activity of tocopherols is rooted in their ability to donate phenolic hydrogens to lipid radicals. Because it lacks electron-donating methyl groups on the chromanol ring, γ-tocopherol is somewhat less potent in donating electrons than α-tocopherol and thus a slightly less powerful antioxidant. However, the unsubstituted C-5 position of γ-tocopherol appears to make it as a better trap for lipophilic electrophiles such as reactive nitrogen oxide species (RNOSs). Jiang et al. (2002) showed that in vivo γ-tocopherol supplementation, not α-tocopherol, resulted in inhibition of protein nitration and ascorbate oxidation in kidney. Li et al. (1999) also reported that γ-tocopherol was more potent than α-tocopherol in enhancing MnSOD protein expression in arterial tissues affected by cardiovascular disease. Mense et al. (2009) showed that antioxidant vitamin C reduces the incidence of estrogen-induced mammary tumors and increases tumor latency through changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase. The cellular functions of α-tocopherol that are independent of this antioxidant/radical scavenging ability have been well characterized. A recent report suggests that vitamin E isomers possess anti-cancer activity by regulating DNA repair gene and apoptosis via signaling pathways (Aiub et al., 2009; Theriaut et al., 1999). Therefore, we determined the effects of tocopherols on DNA repair elements in 4-OHE₂ induced oxidative stress in breast epithelial cells. We treated 4-OHE₂ and/or tocopherols for 48 h because our pretests indicated that 4-OHE₂ induced the depletion of BRCA1 and PARP-1 protein expression at 48 hr. Our results showed that α-tocopherol stimulates the up-regulated expression of DNA repair proteins, including BRCA1 and PARP-1. Yu et al. (2003) and Gu et al. (2008) reported that human cancer cells undergo apoptosis stimulated by α-tocopherol succinate in a concentration- and time-dependent manner by restoring PARP-1 levels.

In conclusion, the estrogen metabolite, 4-OHE₂ affects cellular redox status, regulates the expression of proteins closely related DNA repair and promotes breast cancer cell growth. As far as we know, this is one of few studies to examine the involvement of oxidized estradiol in the impaired DNA repair. Exogenous α- and γ-tocopherol played a role as anti-cancer compounds by modulating 4-OHE₂ induced oxidative stresses.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on oxidative markers in MCF-10A cells. A. Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on intracellular ROS levels in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were treated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 24 h to 96 h. The ROS accumulation was measured using DCF-DA as described in materials and methods. ^*Significantly different from the control value (P < 0.05). B. Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on GSH levels in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 24 to 96 h. The level of GSH was measured as described in materials and methods. ^*Significantly different from the control value (P < 0.05). C. Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on MnSOD protein expression in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 24 to 96 h. MnSOD protein expression was detected by western blot analysis and normalized by β-actin as described in materials and methods. ^**Significantly different from the control value (P < 0.01). Values present means ± standard deviation (n=3 or 4).

Fig. 2

Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on BRCA1 and PARP-1 protein expression in MCF-10A cells. A. Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on BRCA1 protein expression in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 24 to 96 h. BRCA1 protein expression was detected by western blot as described in materials and methods. ^*Significantly different from the control value (P < 0.05). B. Effect of 4-hydroxyestradiol (4-OHE₂) on PARP-1 protein in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ for 24 to 96 h. PARP-1 protein was detected by western blot analysis and normalized by β-actin as described in materials and methods. ^*Significantly different from the control value, P < 0.05.Values present means ± standard deviation (n=3 or 4).

Fig. 3

Effect of α- and γ-tocopherol on oxidative stresses in MCF-10A cells. A. Effect of α- and γ-tocopherols on 4-OHE₂ induced ROS in MCF-10A. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ only with or without 30 µM α-, or γ-tocopherols for 96 h. Different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). B. Effect of α- and γ-tocopherol on GSH/GSSG levels in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ only with or without 30 µM α-, or γ-tocopherols for 96 h. ^*Significantly different from 4-OHE₂ value, P < 0.05. Different superscripts (a, b) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). C. Effect of α- and γ-tocopherol on MnSOD expression in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ with or without 30 µM α-, or γ-tocopherols for 96 h. MnSOD protein expression was detected by western blot analysis and normalized by β-actin as described in materials and methods. Different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Values present means ± standard deviation (n=3 or 4).

Fig. 4

Effect of α- and γ-tocopherol on BRCA 1 and PARP-1 expression in MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were incubated with or without 0.1 µM 4-OHE₂ with or without 30µM α-, or γ-tocopherols for 48 h. BRCA1 and PARP-1 protein expression was detected by western blot analysis and normalized by β-actin as described in materials and methods. Different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Values present means ± standard deviation (n=3 or 4).

Notes

This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2005-042-C00194) and by the SRC program of KOSEF (Research Center for Women's Diseases).

References

1. Abiaka C, Al-Awadi F, Gulshan S, Al-Sayer H, Behbehani A, Farghaly M, Simbeye A. Plasma concentrations of alpha-tocopherol and urate in patients with different types of cancer. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001. 26:265–270.

2. Aiub CA, Pinto LF, Felzenszwalb I. DNA-repair genes and vitamin E in the prevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine mutagenicity. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2009. 25:393–402.

3. Ame JC, Spenlehauer C, de Murcia G. The PARP superfamily. Bioessays. 2004. 26:882–893.

4. Arrigo AP. Gene expression and the thiol redox state. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999. 27:936–944.

5. Baba T, Shimizu T, Suzuki Y, Ogawara M, Isono K, Koseki H, Kurosawa H, Shirasawa T. Estrogen, insulin, and dietary signals cooperatively regulate longevity signals to enhanceresistance to oxidative stress in mice. J Biol Chem. 2005. 280:16417–16426.

6. Bae I, Fan S, Meng Q, Rih JK, Kim HJ, Kang HJ, Xu J, Goldberg ID, Jaiswal AK, Rosen EM. BRCA1 induces antioxidant gene expression and resistance to oxidative stress. Cancer Res. 2004. 64:7893–7909.

7. Belous AR, Hachey DL, Dawling S, Roodi N, Parl FF. Cytochrome P450 1B1-mediated estrogen metabolism results in estrogen-deoxyribonucleoside adduct formation. Cancer Res. 2007. 67:812–817.

8. Brodie SG, Deng CX. BRCA1-associated tumorigenesis: what have we learned from knockout mice? Trends Genet. 2001. 17:S18–S22.

9. Campbell SE, Stone WL, Lee S, Whaley S, Yang H, Qui M, Goforth P, Sherman D, McHaffie D, Krishnan K. Comparative effects of RRR-alpha- and RRR-gamma-tocopherol on proliferation and apoptosis in human colon cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2006. 6:13.

10. Campbell SE, Stone WL, Whaley SG, Qui M, Krishnan K. Gamma (gamma) tocopherol upregulates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) gamma (gamma) expression in SW 480 human colon cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2003. 3:25.

11. Cantor SB, Andreassen PR. Assessing the link between BACH1 and BRCA1 in the FA pathway. Cell Cycle. 2006. 5:164–167.

12. Chen ZH, Na HK, Hurh YJ, Surh YJ. 4-Hydroxyestradiol induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in human mammary epithelial cells: possible protection by NF-kappaB and ERK/MAPK. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005. 208:46–56.

13. Colditz GA. Relationship between estrogen levels, use of hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998. 90:814–823.

14. Cuendet M, Bolton JL. Response of human mammary epithelial cells to DNA damage induced by 4-hydroxyequilenin: Lack of p53-mediated G1 arrest. Chem Biol Interact. 2006. 161:271–278.

15. de Murcia G, Ménissier de Murcia J. Poly (ADP-ribose)polymerase: a molecular nick-sensor. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994. 19:172–176.

16. De Soto JA, Deng CX. PARP-a inhibitor: are they the lomg-sought genetically specific drugs for BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer? Int J Med Sci. 2006. 3:117–123.

17. Deng CX, Wang RH. Roles of BRCA1 in DNA damage repair: a link between development and cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2003. 12 Spec No 1:R113–R123.

18. Esworthy RS, Baker MA, Chu FF. Expression of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase in human breast tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1995. 55:957–962.

19. Fernandez SV, Russo IH, Russo J. Estradiol and its metabolites 4-hydroxyestradiol and 2-hydroxyestradiol inducemutation in human breast epithelial cells. Int J Cancer. 2006. 118:1862–1868.

20. Ginestier C, Liu S, Wicha MS. Getting to the root of BRCA1-deficient breast cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2009. 5:229–330.

21. Goodman GE, Schaffer S, Omenn GS, Chen C, King I. The association between lung and prostate cancer risk, and serum micronutrients: results and lessons learned from beta-carotene andretinol efficacy trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003. 12:518–526.

22. Griffith OW. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal Biochem. 1980. 106:207–212.

23. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Joffe M, Rosner B, Fuchs C, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1997. 336:1769–1775.

24. Gu X, Song X, Dong Y, Cai H, Walters E, Zhang R, Pang X, Xie T, Guo Y, Sridhar R, Califano JA. Vitamin E succinate induces ceramide-mediated apoptosis in head and neck squamouscell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. 14:1840–1848.

25. Gysin R, Azzi A, Visarius T. Gamma-tocopherol inhibits human cancer cell cycle progression and cell proliferation by down-regulation of cyclins. FASEB J. 2002. 16:1952–1954.

26. Han X, Liehr JG. 8-Hydroxylation of guanine bases in kidney and liver DNA of hamsters treated with estradiol: role of free radicals in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994. 54:5515–5517.

27. Harvell DM, Strecker TE, Tochacek M, Xie B, Pennington KL, McComb RD, Roy SK, Shull JD. Rat strain-specific actions of 17beta-estradiol in the mammary gland: correlation between estrogen-induced lobuloalveolar hyperplasia and susceptibility to estrogen-induced mammary cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000. 97:2779–2784.

28. Hitchler MJ, Wikainapakul K, Yu L, Powers K, Attatippaholkun W, Domann FE. Epigenetic regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase expression in human breast cancer cells. Epigenetics. 2006. 1:163–171.

29. Jiang LJQ, Shienaga MK, Shigeno T, Christen S, Ames BN. Gamma-tocopherol supplementation inhibits protien nitration and ascorbate oxidation in rats with inflammation. Free Rad Biol Med. 2002. 33:1534–1542.

30. King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003. 302:643–646.

31. Lane DP. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 1992. 358:15–16.

32. Li D, Saldeen T, Romeo F, Mehta JL. Relative Effects of alpha- and gamma-Tocopherol on Low-Density Lipoprotein Oxidation and Superoxide Dismutase and Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity and Protein Expression in Rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 1999. 4:219–226.

33. Li JJ, Oberley LW, Fan M, Colburn NH. Inhibition of AP-1 and NF-kappaB by manganese-containing superoxide dismutase in human breast cancer cells. FASEB J. 1998. 12:1713–1723.

34. Liu R, Oberley TD, Oberley LW. Transfection and expression of MnSOD cDNA decreases tumor malignancy of human oral squamous carcinoma SCC-25 cells. Hum Gene Ther. 1997. 8:585–595.

35. Liu R, Oberley TD, Oberley LW. Effects of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression on the tumor biology of human oral carcinoma SCC-25 cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1998. 9:239–246.

36. Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, Fraumeni JF, Nelson CE, Kim DH, Kassel J, Gryka MA, Bischoff FZ, Tainsky MA. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science. 1990. 250:1233–1238.

37. McMillan DC, Talwar D, Sattar N, Underwood M, O'Reilly DS, McArdle C. The relationship between reduced vitamin antioxidant concentrations and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with common solid tumours. Clin Nutr. 2002. 21:161–164.

38. Mense SM, Singh B, Remotti F, Liu X, Bhat HK. Vitamin C and alpha-naphthoflavone prevent estrogen-induced mammary tumors and decrease oxidative stress in female ACI rats. Carcinogenesis. 2009. 30:1202–1208.

39. Pastore A, Federici G, Bertini E, Piemonte F. Analysis of glutathione: Implication in redox and detoxification. Clin Chim Acta. 2003. 333:19–39.

40. Plummer ER. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006. 6:364–368.

41. Rosen EM, Fan S, Pestell RG, Goldberg ID. BRCA1 gene in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2003. 196:19–41.

42. Roy S, Lado BH, Khanna S, Sen CK. Vitamin E sensitive genes in the developing rat fetal brain: a high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. FEBS Lett. 2002. 530:17–23.

43. Service RF. New role for estrogen in cancer? Science. 1998. 279:1631–1633.

44. Theriault A, Chao JT, Wang Q, Gapor A, Adeli K. Tocotrienol: a review of its therapeutic potential. Clin Biochem. 1999. 32:309–319.

45. Tong WM, Yang YG, Cao WH, Galendo D, Frappart L, Shen Y, Wang ZQ. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 plays a role in suppressing mammary tumorigenesis in mice. Oncogene. 2007. 26:3857–3867.

46. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell. 2002. 108:171–182.

47. Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J, Roach KC, Mandell J, Lee MK, Ciernikova S, Foretiva L, Soucek PKM. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in Families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2007. 295:1379–1388.

48. Wittmann BM, Fujinaga K, Deng H, Ogba N, Montano MM. The breast cell growth inhibitor, estrogen down regulated gene 1, modulates a novel functional interaction between estrogen receptor alpha and transcriptional elongation factor cyclin T1. Oncogene. 2005. 24:5576–5588.

49. Yager JD, Liehr JG. Molecular mechanisms of estrogen carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996. 36:203–232.

50. Yu W, Sanders BG, Kline K. RRR-alpha-tocopheryl succinate-induced apoptosis of human breast cancer cells involves Bax translocation to mitochondria. Cancer Res. 2003. 63:2483–2491.

51. Zhang J, Powell SN. The role of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor in DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cancer Res. 2005. 3:531–539.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs: Mi-Kyung Sung
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-5628
Similar articles