Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
MATERIALS/METHODS
RESULTS
Figures and Tables
![]() | Fig. 1Effect of Dual-Oligo on gastrointestinal transit ratio.The intestinal tract ratio of charcoal (%) = (moving distance of the most distal end portion of the charcoal /total length intestinal tract) ×100. Bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 8). Different letters in the bar mean significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Tukey's test. Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
|
![]() | Fig. 2Concentrations of acetic acid, butyric acid, and propionic acid in loperamide-treated rat feces.Bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 8). Different letters in the bar mean a significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Tukey's test. Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
|
![]() | Fig. 3Bifidobacteria counts of cecal contents in loperamide-treated rats.Bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 8). NS: not significantly different among groups; Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
|
![]() | Fig. 4Effects of Dual-Oligo on histological parameters in a loperamide-induced constipation model.(A) Cross-sections of the distal colon were stained with Alcian blue at a pH of 2.5 (×100). Arrow indicates the surface mucus thickness measurement. (B) Area of colonic crypt; (C) Thickness of colonic mucosa. Bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 8). Different letters in the bar mean a significant difference at P < 0.05 level by Tukey's test. Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
|
Table 1
Effect of dietary Dual-Oligo on body weight gain, food intake, and food efficiency ratio in normal rats and loperamide-treated rats

FER: Food efficiency ratio = body weight gain (g)/food intake (g). Mean ± SEM (n = 8). Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05) among groups by Tukey's test. NS: not significantly different among groups; Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
Table 2
Effect of dietary Dual-Oligo on number of fecal pellets, wet weight of fecal pellets, and fecal water content in rats

Mean ± S.D. (n = 8). Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05) among groups by Tukey's test. NS: not significantly different among groups; Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
Table 3
Effect of Dual-Oligo on serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol in SD and loperamide-treated rats

Mean ± S.D. (n = 8). Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05) among groups by Tukey's test. NS: not significantly different among groups; Normal: normal group; Control: loperamide-treated group; LDO: low concentration of Dual-Oligo (10%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group; HDO: high concentration of Dual-Oligo (15%, w/v of drinking water) and loperamide-treated group.
Notes
References




















