Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.1(1) > 1050773

Jang and Song: Personal digital assistants: Essential tools for preparing dietetics professionals to use new generation information technology

Abstract

Rapid integration of information technology into health care systems has included the use of highly portable systems-in particular, personal digital assistants (PDAs). With their large built-in memories, fast processors, wireless connectivity, multimedia capacity, and large library of applications, PDAs have been widely adopted by physicians and nurses for patient tracking, disease management, medical references and drug information, enhancing a quality of health care. Many health-related PDA applications are available to both dietetics professionals and clients. Dietetics professionals can effectively use PDAs for client tracking and support, accessing to hospital database or information, and providing better self-monitoring tools to clients. Internship programs for dietetics professionals should include training in the use of PDAs and their dietetics applications, so that new practitioners can stay abreast of this rapidly evolving technology. Several considerations to keep in mind in selecting a PDA and its applications are discussed.

Introduction

Personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been widely adopted in medical practice in recent years. Recent surveys of physicians have shown that 40 ~ 60% of physicians are using PDAs, and this percentage is expected to increase, possibly due to benefits from using the technology in their health practices (Carroll & Christakis, 2004; Criswell & Parchman, 2002; Larkin, 2001; Skyscape psychiatry PDA usage survey, 2004). Physicians, nurses, and other health professionals use PDAs for patient tracking, patient data management, disease management, e-prescribing, billing, medical references and drug information (Burdette et al., 2004; Fischer et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2004; Stolworthy, 2005; VanDenKerkhof et al., 2003; Volsko, 2004). Use of PDAs by health professionals has been shown to increase efficiency of patient care and management, and to reduce medical errors (Chen et al., 2004; Grasso et al., 2002; McAlearney et al., 2004), resulting in an enhanced quality of health care.
Many of the features that have made PDAs an essential tool for health professionals, i.e. their portability, easy synchronization with computers, wireless connectivity, and variety of available applications, will make them equally central to the modern practices of dietetics. This report provides a general overview of PDAs and their potential applications as a resource for dietetics professionals, and lists considerations in selecting a PDA for professional use.

Basics

PDAs, also referred to as handheld computers, are light and pocket sized digital devices that use a stylus or keyboard for input. PDAs were first introduced by Apple computer (Cupertino, CA) in 1993, and became more prevalent with the introduction of models by PalmOne Inc (Milpitas, CA) in 1996 (Volsko, 2004). PDAs are currently manufactured by many companies, including PalmOne, Sony, Samsung, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Compaq, Casio, Toshiba, and Dell. The most common types of PDAs are the Blackberry, Palm, and those using Windows Pocket PC. Table 1 summarizes a comparison among these major PDA types by their major features. Some other types of PDAs are Java/J2ME, Linux, and Symbian.
The common features of PDAs include an address book, calendar, memo feature, things to do list, calculator, making them useful (Rosenthal, 2004; Volsko, 2004). Recent PDA models have color screens, large built in memory, expandable memory cards, fast processors, and multimedia features such as digital cameras, music players, and voice recorders. Many newly developed models have wireless connectivity to computers and the Internet, using Bluetooth (short range: within 30 feet), and Wi fi (long distance: within 300 feet) wireless technologies. Smartphone, a hybrid of PDA and telephone, is also available, providing additional convenience to users. These multiple features have led to the wide adoption of PDAs as portable computers by health professionals.

Applications

Physicians and medical students install references and applications on their PDAs, and readily use them in their education and practices (Carroll & Christakis, 2004; Criswell & Parchman, 2002; McAlearney et al., 2004; McLeod et al., 2003). The applications most commonly used by residents and physicians are database management, medical references, clinical computation, patient tracking and drug information (Carroll & Christakis, 2004; Criswell & Parchman, 2002; Groote & Doranski, 2004; McAlearney et al., 2004; McLeod et al., 2003). Similarly, there are many health and nutrition related applications available for use by dietetics professionals (Table 2). The National Institutes of Health provide health education materials, clinical guidelines, nutrient database, and calculators for Palm OS and Windows Pocket PC free of charge. There are also a number of nutrition assessment and health management applications available. As of May 20, 2005, there were more than 100 diet and exercise related applications available at Handango. com (Handango.com, Accessed May 20, 2005). Dietetics professional can use these applications both to provide clients with effective assessment, education, counseling, and health care, and also to provide clients tools for self monitoring and health management.
In addition to content specific applications, dietetics professionals can also benefit from the general purpose applications available. These include document processing applications (word processing/spreadsheet/slide presentation), the Portable Document Format (PDF) file viewer, an e book reader, and a dictionary. The American Dietetic Association (ADA) is considering converting Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) protocol files into PDF files (McCaffree, 2001), thus making them readily available on PDAs. This resource would make the research based evidence to support their advice and counseling readily available to dietetics professionals. The use of PDAs and their applications will have dietetics professionals easily and dynamically updated at the point of care (Hansen & Dorup, 2001; Johnson et al., 2004).

Buying Guidelines for PDA and Its Applications

The key variables to consider in selecting a PDA are the operating system, cost, memory, wireless features, and application availability (Chevan, 2004; Rosenthal, 2003; Volsko, 2004). PDA Web portals such as MobileTechReview.com (MobileTechReview. com, Accessed May 20, 2005), ZDnet.com (ZDnet.com, Accessed in May 20, 2005), and PCWorld.com (PCWorld.com, Accessed May 20, 2005) provide detailed information on a variety of PDAs, PDA product comparison charts, and users' guidelines, and thus serve as good Web resources for the first time PDA buyers and current users.
The choice of operating system not only depends on the professional context of use but also on personal preference. More than 80% of physicians and residents in family practice residency programs and hospitals use Palm OS PDAs (Criswell & Parchman, 2002; Groote & Doranski, 2004; McLeod et al., 2003), due to its user friendliness, longer battery life, and a larger number of available medical related applications. For patient care and education in clinical health settings, Palm OS PDAs are recommended to dietetics professionals considering compatibility with other colleagues and hospital systems. For private practices, the choice is increasingly a matter of personal preference and compatibility with clients, since the number of users of the Windows Pocket PC (40% of PDA users in 2004 compared to 16% in 2001) and its applications are steadily increasing (Gartner Dataquest, Accessed April 30, 2005).
It is essential to buy a PDA with built in memory sufficient to install all the applications and references the purchaser intends to use on the PDA. For Palm OS, at least 32 MB of internal memory is recommended. For Windows Pocket PC, which requires more memory to operate, 64 MB of memory is recommended. A PDA with wireless connectivity is becoming increasingly important to provide remote access to central databases, electronic journals, medical news, and references (Burdette et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2004; Duncan & Shabot, 2000; Hansen & Dorup, 2001). Wireless PDAs are not yet in popular use, possibly due to a lack of knowledge, but the wireless feature will make PDAs real mobile tools for future health care since health professionals can provide patients with needed information anytime and anywhere (Chen et al., 2004; Duncan & Shabot, 2000).
Before purchasing PDA applications, it is best to evaluate trial versions, provided free for 15 ~ 30 days, to test the applications for user friendliness and compatability with the intended use. Handango.com (Handango.com, Accessed May 20, 2005), Palmgear.com (PalmGear.com, Accessed May 15, 2005), and Tucows.com (Tucows.com, Accessed May 15, 2005) are the best known online stores for PDA applications, and provide good information on the applications. Among these sites, Handango. com was our first choice. All applications it sells are well categorized by operating systems, and then by application types (e.g. business, databases, education, medical, health/fitness, personal productivity, etc). Comparable applications can be sorted by number of downloads, best selling items, and review rankings, providing guidance in assessing application quality. Medical application sites such as MedicalWizards.com (Medical Wizards. com, Accessed May 15, 2005), PDACortex. com (PDACortex. com, Accessed May 15, 2005), Skyscape.com (Skyscape.com, Accessed May 15, 2005), and Unbound Medicine. com (Unbound Medicine.com, Accessed May 15, 2005) provide extensive information on a variety of medical applications by professions, specialty, and purpose of use.

Conclusions

The widespread adoption of PDAs by other health professionals points to their importance for dietetics professionals as well. Information technology has become integrated within all aspects of health care, and will further enhance the quality of health care as it continues to improve (Burdette, 2004; Fischer et al., 2003; Grasso et al., 2002; VanDenKerkhof et al., 2003; Volsko, 2004; ZDnet.com, Accessed May 15, 2005). To the best of our knowledge, no information has yet been gathered on the extent and nature of PDA use among dietetics professionals, or their attitudes towards using PDAs and information technology. Research on dietetics professionals' use of PDAs and information technology would help increase awareness about the technology use in their practices for effective counseling, education, and health care for clients. Such research would also guide the development of education materials and training sessions to support dietetics professionals as they learn to use these cutting edge technologies.
The inclusion of training in the use of PDAs in medical residency programs has been successful in preparing residents to use PDAs effectively in their education and practices (Criswell & Parchman, 2002; McLeod et al., 2003; Rao, 2002). This result suggests incorporating training in the use of PDAs in dietetic internship programs would help introduce the technology and its applications to the next generation of practitioners. Further research is needed to understand impacts of PDA implementation in dietetic internship programs as well as potential effects of PDA and technology use in dietetics practices.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
A comparison of PDAs by operating systems
nrp-1-42-i001

1)Smartphone; a hybrid of PDA and phone.

2)Handango.com; Online PDA application store, Accessed March 9, 2007.

Table 2
Health related PDA applications and education materials for the use of dietetics professionals
nrp-1-42-i002

Applications under each category are listed by an alphabetic order. Accessed March 9, 2007.

Notes

This report was not supported by any of the companies manufacturing PDAs or applications described, and authors do not have any financial interests in these companies.

References

1. Burdette S, Herchline T, Richardson WS. Killing bugs at the bedside: a prospective hospital survey of how frequently personal digital assistants provide expert recommendations in the treatment of infectious diseases. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2004. 3:22–27.
2. Carroll AE, Christakis DA. Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics. 2004. 113:238–242.
crossref
3. Chen ES, Mendonca EA, McKnight LK, Stetson PD, Lei J, Cimino JJ. PalmCIS: A wireless handheld application for satisfying clinician information needs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004. 11:19–28.
crossref
4. Chevan J. PDAs, PDQ. PT Magazine. 2004. 12:22–24.
5. Criswell DF, Parchman ML. Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002. 9:80–86.
crossref
6. Duncan R, Shabot M. Secure remote access to a clinical data repository using a wireless personal digital assistant (PDA). Proc AMIA Symp. 2000. 210–214.
7. Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky SE. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003. 10:139–149.
crossref
8. Gartner Dataquest. PalmSource, Microsoft tie for 1Q04 PDA market lead. 2004. Accessed on 4/30/2005. http://news.designtechnica.com/article3599.html.
9. Grasso BC, Genest R, Yung K, Arnold C. Reducing errors in discharge medication lists by using personal digital assistants. Psychiatr Serv. 2002. 53:1325–1326.
crossref
10. Groote S, Doranski M. The use of personal digital assistants in the health sciences: results of a survey. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004. 92:341–348.
11. Handango.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/20/2005. http://www.handango.com.
12. Hansen M, Dorup J. Wireless access to a pharmaceutical database: a demonstrator for data driven wireless application protocol applications in medical information processing. J Med Internet Res. 2001. 3:e4.
crossref
13. Johnson ED, Pancoast PE, Mitchell JA, Shyu CR. Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based alerting service for clinicians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004. 92:438–444.
14. Larkin M. Can handheld computers improve the quality of care? Lancet. 2001. 358:1438–1439.
crossref
15. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004. 328:1162–1166.
crossref
16. McCaffree J. Techno-tools for tracking outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001. 101:1310–1311.
crossref
17. McLeod TG, Ebbert JO, Lymp JF. Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003. 10:605–607.
crossref
18. MedicalWizards.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.medicalwizards.com.
19. MobileTechReview.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.mobiletechreview.com.
20. PalmGear.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.palmgear.com.
21. PCWorld.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.pcworld.com.
22. PDACortex.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.pdacortex.com.
23. Rao G. Introduction of handheld computing to a family practice residency program. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2002. 15:118–122.
24. Rosenthal K. "Touch" vs. "Tech": valuing nursing-specific PDA software. Nurs Manage. 2003. 34:58–60.
crossref
25. Rosenthal K. Get "smart" with a PDA. Nurs Manage. 2004. 35:Suppl 5. 17–18.
crossref
26. Skyscape.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.skyscape.com.
27. Skyscape psychiatry PDA usage survey. Psychiatrists using handheld computers to improve quality of patient care. 2004. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://skyscape.com/company/NewsArticle.aspx?id=162.
28. Stolworthy Y. RNs are mobilizing. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.pdacortex.com/RNs_are_Mobilizing.htm.
29. Tucows.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.tucows.com.
30. UnboundMedicine.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.unboundmedicine.com.
31. VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Lane J, Rimmer MJ, Van Dijk JP. Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003. 50:368–375.
crossref
32. Volsko TA. Portable computers and applications in respiratory care. Respir Care. 2004. 49:497–506.
33. ZDnet.com. 2005. Accessed on 5/15/2005. http://www.zdnet.com.
TOOLS
Similar articles