The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Sonchus oleraceus L. extracts

Jie Yin; Gu-Joong Kwon; Myeong-Hyeon Wang

doi:10.4162/nrp.2007.1.3.189

Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.1(3) > 1050741

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Yin, Kwon, and Wang: The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Sonchus oleraceus L. extracts

Original Research

Nutrition Research and Practice

Nutrition Research and Practice 2007; 1(3): 189-194.

Published online: 30 September 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2007.1.3.189

The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Sonchus oleraceus L. extracts

Jie Yin, Gu-Joong Kwon, Myeong-Hyeon Wang

School of Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon-Do 200-701, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Myeong-Hyeon Wang, Tel. 82-33-250-6486, Fax. 82-33-241-6480, mhwang@kangwon.ac.kr

Received 23 July 2007 Revised 16 August 2007 Accepted 3 September 2007

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study investigated in vitro antioxidant activity of Sonchus oleraceus L. by extraction solvent, which were examined by reducing power, hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity(HRSA) and 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assays. 70% MeOH extract had the greatest reducing power while EtOH extract had the greatest HRSA. The antioxidant activity of S. oleraceus extracts was concentration dependent and its IC₅₀ values ranged from 47.1 to 210.5 µg/ml and IC₅₀ of 70% MeOH, boiling water and 70% EtOH extracts were 47.1, 52.7 and 56.5 µg/ml, respectively. 70% MeOH extract of S. oleraceus contained the greatest amount of both phenolic and flavonoid contents. The extracts tested had greater nitrite scavenging effects at lower pH conditions. The cytotoxic activity showed that EtOH extract had the best activity against the growth of stomach cancer cell. These results suggest that S. oleraceus extract could be used as a potential source of natural antioxidants.

Keywords: Sonchus oleraceus L, Antioxidant, Cytotoxic, Phenolic content, Nitrite scavenging activity

Introduction

Free radicals lead to a variety of biochemical and physiological lesions (Ames, 1998) and are implicated in the etiology of degenerative diseases, including coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer (Halliwell et al., 1992). Antioxidants delay or prevent oxidation of the substrate (Halliwell, 1995). Interest in finding naturally occurring antioxidants in foods or medicines to replace synthetic antioxidants has increased considerably, given that synthetic antioxidants are being restricted due to their side effects (Ito et al., 1983; Zneng & Wang, 2001). Therefore, attention has been directed toward the development and isolation of natural antioxidants from plant sources. The antioxidants in some plants including ascorbic acid, carotenoids, flavonoids and hydrolysable tannins play important roles in preventing diseases induced by free radicals (Huxley & Neil, 2003). The antioxidant activity of plant materials is correlated with their phenolic compound content (Velioglu et al., 1998). Polyphenols belong to a heterogeneous class of compounds with a variety of antioxidant actions. The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities have been studied using medicinal plants and fruits (Singh et al., 2002). The bioactivity of phenolics may be related to their ability to chelate metals, inhibit lipoxygenase, and scavenge free radicals (Decker, 1997). In addition, flavonoids can act as free radical scavengers and terminate the radical chain reactions that occur during the oxidation of triglycerides (Das & Pereira, 1990). It has been reported that phenolic compounds have a nitrite scavenging effect at low pH (Kang et al., 1996). The antioxidant and anticancer activities of extracts from medicinal plants and herbs are associated with phenolic compounds (Cai et al., 2004).

S. oleraceus has rough, thorny petioles that embrace the main stem. It blossoms yellow flowers from May to September, and the seeds ripen in July. The seeds are used for medicine and young leaves are edible. It was suggested that the amount of polyphenol and the antioxidant activity in plants depend on environment factors such as growing season (Howard et al., 2002) and location (Ma et al., 2003). The nutritional composition of S. oleraceus was reported previously (Guil-Guerrero et al., 1998). However, detailed information on antioxidative activities of the S. oleraceus was not sufficiently available.

Therefore, this study was initiated to investigate the antioxidant activities of S. oleraceus by extraction solvent, including the free radical scavenging activity, reducing power, nitrite scavenging activity, total phenolic content, and flavonoid content using a number of classical assays. We evaluated whether this species could be used as a source of natural antioxidants.

Materials and Methods

Extraction of S. oleraceus

S. oleraceus were collected at Chuncheon in South Korea in August, 2006. They were dried in the shade at room temperature and cut into small pieces, followed by being grinded into powder. Dried S. oleraceus powder (100 g) was soaked in 2 L of six different solvents including water, ethanol, 70% ethanol, methanol and 70% methanol, and kept in a shaking incubator at 25℃ for 2 days. For the extraction with boiling water, the powder was heated at 100℃ for 3 h. After filtering the extracts in vacuum with Whatman No. 1 filter paper, the residue was re-extracted, filtered, and evaporated using a rotary evaporator at 45℃. The yields of these dried extracts were as follows: water extract 8.1%, boiling water extract 12.2%, ethanol extract 3.8%, 70% ethanol extract 8.7%, methanol extract 8.5%, 70% methanol extract 11.5% and chloroform extract 3.0%. All of extracts were kept in the refrigerator prior to further experiments.

Reducing power assay

The reducing power assay was determined according to the method of Oyaizu (1986). Different concentrations of S. oleraceus extract in 1 ml of each solvent including water, ethanol and methanol were mixed with 2.5 ml of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 ml of 1% potassium ferricyanide, respectively. The mixture was incubated at 50℃ for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 395 × g for 10 min at room temperature after 2.5 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) was added. The upper layer (2.5 ml) was mixed with 2.5 ml of distilled water and 0.5 ml of 0.1% ferric chloride, and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Vitamin E was used as the standard.

Hydroxyl radical (·OH) scavenging activity

The scavenging activity of the S. oleraceus extracts on the hydroxyl radical (·OH) was based on the deoxyribose method (Aruoma, 1994). Hydroxyl radicals were generated by direct addition of iron (II) salts to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture contained 200 µl of 10 mM FeSO₄ 7 H₂O, 200 µl of 10 mM EDTA, 200 µl of 10 mM 2-deoxyribose, 200 µl of 10 mM H₂O₂, mixed with 1.2 ml of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 200 µl of S. oleraceus extract. The reaction mixture was incubated for 4 h at 37℃ in a water bath. After incubation, 1 ml of 1% thiobarbituric acid and 1 ml of ice-cold 2.8% trichloroacetic acid were added to the resultant reaction mixture followed by being heated in a boiling water bath (95℃-100℃) for 10 min. After cooling down to room temperature and being centrifuged at 395 × g for 5 min, the absorbance at 532 nm was measured. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and Vitamin E were used as the positive control.

Radical scavenging activity (RSA)

The free radical scavenging activity was determined according to the method of 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical (Kilani et al., 2005). Different concentrations (0.025-0.4 mg/ml) of S. oleraceus extract (0.5 ml) were mixed with 0.5 ml freshly prepared DPPH in MeOH (final concentration 65 µM). The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm after incubation for 30 min in the dark condition at room temperature. The IC₅₀ value, defined as the amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%, was calculated by using the percent scavenging activities of serially diluted extract concentration.

Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents

The total phenolic content was estimated by Folin-Denis reagent. One ml of each extract at different concentrations was mixed with 2 ml of Folin-Denis reagent and 2 ml of 35% sodium carbonate. The mixtures were shaken thoroughly and made up to 10 ml with distilled water. The absorbance at 760 nm was determined after incubation at room temperature for 30 min. Phenolic content was estimated from a standard curve determined from different concentrations of tannic acid.

Total flavonoid contents were determined according to the aluminum chloride colorimetric method (Chang et al., 2002). Quercetin was used as a standard to make the calibration curve. The sample solution (0.5 ml) was mixed with 1.5 ml of 95% ethanol, 0.1 ml of 10% aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl₃), 0.1 ml of 1 M potassium acetate (CH₃COOK) and 2.8 ml of distilled water. After incubation at room temperature for 40 min, the absorbance of reaction mixture was measured at 415 nm. The same amount of distilled water substituted for the amount of 10% aluminum chloride as the blank. Using a seven point standard curve (0-500 mg/l), the total flavonoid content of extracts was determined in independent triplicate (n=3).

Measurement of nitrite scavenging ability (NSA)

One ml of each extract sample was mixed with 1 ml of 1 mM nitrite sodium and followed by addition of 8 ml solution at pH 1.2 adjusted with 0.1 N HCl or 0.2 M citrate buffer at pH 4.2 and 6.0. Then 1 ml from this mixture was withdrawn and added to 2 ml of 2% acetic acid and 0.4 ml of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilic acid and 1% naphthylamine in a methanol solution containing 30% acetic acid) after incubation in a water bath at 37℃ for 1 h. After vigorously mixed with a vortex, the reactant was placed at room temperature for 15 min, and the absorbance was measured at 520 nm. A blank was prepared by adding 0.4 ml distilled water instead of the Griess reagent.

In vitro cytotoxic activity (MTT assay)

The cytotoxicity of S. oleraceus extracts to the stomach cancer cell line (NCI-N87) was determined by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma) assay (Sun et al., 2005). The stomach cancer cell NCI-N87 was seeded into a 96-well plate at 1 × 10⁶ cells/ml in 200 µl RPMI complete medium containing each extract from S. oleraceus. After 48 h of incubation at 37℃ in humidified chamber adjusted with 5% CO₂, 50 µl of MTT solution (2 mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated 4 h further. The supernatant was carefully removed using a needle or syringe and 100 µl of DMSO was added to each well followed by pipetting up and down to dissolve crystals. The plate was placed in a 37℃ incubator for 5 min to dissolve air bubbles. The absorbance at 570 nm was measured with a microplate reader. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in independent triplicate (n=3) and data were expressed as mean ± standard derivation for a number of experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 7.5 (SPSS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and individual comparisons were obtained by Duncan's multiple-range test which was used to determine the difference of means, and p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Reducing power assay

Although all of the extracts had less reducing power activity than Vitamin E at the same concentration, extracts from the sample had considerable reducing activity. As shown in the results, the reducing activity of six extracts, in the descending order, was 70% MeOH > boiling water > 70% EtOH > MeOH > water > EtOH (Fig. 1). This is in accord with the order of the free radical scavenging activity and may be associated with the relationship between the antioxidant activity and reducing power of plant extracts.

Hydroxyl(·OH) radical scavenging activity

The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of S. oleraceus extracts was increased with the sample concentrations (Fig. 2). Nearly all of the extracts showed a considerable hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, although the activity was less than those of the positive controls at the same concentration (Vitamin E and BHT scavenged 78.2 and 78.7% of the available free radicals, respectively, at the concentration of 100 µg/ml). At concentrations from 500 to 1,000 µg/ml, all of the extracts scavenged more than 70% of the available free radicals.

Radial scavenging activity (RSA)

The free radical scavenging capacities of the extracts, measured by the 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method, are shown in Table 1. The boiling water, 70% MeOH, and 70% EtOH extracts had stronger antioxidant activities than any other extract from S. oleraceus.

Determination of the Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents

The contents of the 70% MeOH, 70% EtOH, boiling water, MeOH, water and EtOH extracts were 74.8, 73.6, 71.2, 54.1, 40.5 and 39.5 mg/g, respectively (Table 2). The flavonoid contents of the extracts are shown in Table 2, and they were in accord with the total phenolic content.

Measurement of the nitrite scavenging ability (NSA)

The nitrite scavenging effect of S. oleraceus extracts was examined over a range of acidic conditions (pH 1.2, 4.2 and 6.0). The scavenging effect was the highest at pH 1.2 (Fig. 3). However, the nitrite scavenging activity in the tested extracts was not in the same order at different pH levels. The scavenging rates of these six extracts at pH 1.2 were shown to be in order as boiling water (71%), 70% EtOH (67%), MeOH (59%), 70% MeOH (54%), EtOH (48%) and water (44%). Moreover, the nitrite scavenging effect was the greatest at lower pH.

In vitro cytotoxic activity (MTT assay)

The cytotoxic activity of the extracts from S. oleraceus against stomach cancer cell (NCI-N87) is shown in Fig. 4. The percentage of growth inhibition at various concentrations was determined as a percentage of viable treated cells in comparison with viable cells of untreated controls. The EtOH extract had the best activity against the proliferation of stomach cancer cells. The maximal inhibition of cell growth was 65.0% in the EtOH extract compared to 96.5% for paclitaxel at the same concentration of 100 µg/ml.

Discussion

Antioxidant activity is reported to be concomitant with the reducing power, or the capability of reducing oxidized intermediates of the lipid peroxidation processes (Ordonez et al., 2006). The reducing power indicates compounds that are electron donors, which can act as primary and secondary antioxidants (Yen & Chen, 1995). Studies have shown that reducing activity is associated with the presence of reductones (Duh, 1998), which exert their antioxidant effect by donating a hydrogen atom and breaking the free radical chain (Gordon, 1990). Our study showed that all of extracts had less reducing power activity than vitamin E at the same concentration and there were considerable reducing activities in the extracts from our sample. The reducing activity of six extracts was as follows in the descending order: 70% MeOH > Boiling water > 70% EtOH > MeOH > Water > EtOH. Since the reducing activity contributes significantly to the antioxidant activity, we plan to investigate whether the sample contains antioxidants like reductones. As antioxidants donate protons to these radicals, the absorbance is decreased. The decrease in absorbance is used to measure the extent of radical scavenging (Aziz et al., 2007). DPPH is a stable free radical that accepts an electron or hydrogen radical and becomes a stable diamagnetic molecule (Soares et al., 1997). In addition, antioxidant activity has been reported to have a linear relationship with the total phenolic or anthocyanin content in some plants (Kalt et al., 1999). As shown in the results, boiling water extract, 70% MeOH extract and 70% EtOH extract had stronger antioxidant activities (IC₅₀ ranged from 47.1 to 56.5 µg/ml, Table 1) than any other extract from S. Oleraceus (vit. C and BHA with an IC₅₀ of 4.5 and 3.6 µg/ml, respectively), which were in the descending order as: 70% MeOH > Boiling water > 70% EtOH > MeOH > Water > EtOH extract.

Phenolic compounds are found in both edible and inedible plants, which have multiple biological effects including antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is due mainly to their redox properties, which play an important role in absorbing and neutralizing free radicals, quenching single and triple oxygen, and decomposing peroxides (Osawa, 1994; Siriwardhana et al., 2003). Therefore, we hypothesized that the significant hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of the S. oleraceus extracts is likely to be due to phenolic compounds present in the extracts. In our hydroxyl radical scavenging activity assay, nearly all of the extracts showed considerable hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, though less than that of the positive control at the same concentration (100 µg/ml), and the activity order was shown here as: BHT > Ve > EtOH > 70% MeOH > Boiling water > Water > MeOH > 70% EtOH. In addition, the key role of phenolic compounds as free-radical scavengers has been emphasized in several reports (Komali et al., 1999; Moller et al., 1999). The phenolic compounds may contribute to the antioxidative action directly (Duh et al., 1999). A study of Hypericum hyssopifolium found that the antioxidant activity was derived from flavonoid-type compounds (Cakir et al., 2003). It is thought that the high free radical-scavenging activity and total antioxidant activity result from the existence of both phenolic and flavonoid-type compounds. The higher content of total phenolic and flavonoid compounds in S. oleraceus may account for the observed reducing power and free radical scavenging effect.

Nitrite ions in the acidic environment of the stomach induce mutagenic and cell-damaging reactions (Kato & Puck, 1971). Exposure to excess dietary nitrites has been implicated as a potential etiological factor in the development of stomach and colorectal cancers. Nitrite is toxic and the consumption of excess nitrites over time results in the oxidization of hemoglobin, which can lead to methemoglobinemia (Jeon et al., 2002). It has been reported that phenolic compounds have a greater nitrite scavenging effect in environments with low pH (Noh et al., 2002).

In conclusion, based on the results of reducing power, hydroxyl radical scavenging, and DPPH free radical scavenging assays, we showed that extracts from S. oleraceus had effective antioxidant activity. In addition, the extracts may have considerable activity against the growth of the stomach cancer cells. Therefore, S. oleraceus might be a source of food and natural antioxidants.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Effects of different solvents used to produce extracts from S. oleraceus on reducing power. The concentrations of these extracts were the same as 500 µg/ml. Vitamin E at the same concentration of 500 µg/ml was used as the positive control.

Fig. 2

Effects of different solvents used to produce extracts from S. oleraceus on Hydroxyl radical (·OH) scavenging assay. The concentrations of different solvent extracts were 100 (□), 500 (▨) and 1000 (▪) µg/ml, respectively. Vitamin E and BHT at the concentration of 100 µg /ml were used as the positive control.

Fig. 3

Nitrite scavenging activity of various extracts from S. oleraceus. The pH of different solvent extracts was 1.2 (□), 4.2 (▨) and 6.0 (▪), respectively.

Fig. 4

Inhibitory effect of various extracts from S. oleraceus on the growth of NCI-N87 in MTT assay. The concentration of all of the tested extracts was the same as 100 µg/ml. Paclitaxel at the concentration of 100 µg/ml was used as the positive control.

Table 1

DPPH free radical scavenging activity of various extracts from S. oleracheus expressed as IC₅₀ Each value is expressed as a mean of three determinations

IC₅₀: the effective concentration at which DPPH radicals were scavenged by 50%.

Table 2

Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of different extracts from S. oleraceus

Notes

This is partially supported a grant from Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University

References

1. Ames B. Micronutrients prevent cancer and delay aging. Toxicology letters. 1998. 102:5–18.

2. Aruoma OI. Deoxyribose assay for detecting hydroxyl radicals. Methods in Enzymology. 1994. 233:57–66.

3. Aziz T, Mehmet ED, Nazime M, Ibrahim K, Kudret G. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Laetiporus sulphureus (Bull.) Murrill. Food Chem. 2007. 101:267–273.

4. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004. 74:2157–2184.

5. Cakir A, Mavi A, Yildirim A, Duru ME, Harmandar M, Kazaz C. Isolation and characterization of antioxidant phenolic compounds from the aerial parts of Hypericum hyssopifolium L. by activity-guided fractionation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003. 87:73–83.

6. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2002. 10:178–182.

7. Das NP, Pereira TA. Effects of flavonoids on thermal autoxidation of palm oil: structure-activity relationships. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1990. 67:255–258.

8. Decker EA. Phenolics: prooxidants or antioxidants? Nutr Rev. 1997. 55:396–407.

9. Duh PD. Antioxidant activity of burdock (Arctium lappa Linne): its scavenging effect on free radical and active oxygen. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1998. 75:455–461.

10. Duh PD, Tu YY, Yen GC. Antioxidant activity of water extract of harnjyur (Chyrsanthemum morifolium Ramat). Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. 1999. 3:269–277.

11. Gordon MH. Hudson BJF, editor. The mechanism of antioxidant action in vitro. Food Antioxidants. 1990. London. UK: Elsevier;1–18.

12. Guil-Guerrero JL, Giménez-Giménez A, Rodríguez-García I, Torija-Isasa ME. Nutritional composition of Sonchus species (A. asper L, S. oleraceus L and S. tenerrimus L). J Sci Food Agric. 1998. 76:628–232.

13. Halliwell B. Antioxidant characterization: methodology and mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995. 49:1341–1348.

14. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, Cross CE. Free radicals, antioxidants and human disease: Where are we now? J Lab Clin Med. 1992. 119:598–620.

15. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. The world's worst weeds: Distribution and Biology. 1977. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii;436–439.

16. Howard LR, Pandjaitan N, Morelock T, Gil MI. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of spinach as affected by genetics and growing season. J Agric Food Chem. 2002. 50:5891–5896.

17. Huxley RR, Neil H. The relationship between dietary flavonol intake and coronary heart disease mortality: a metaanalysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003. 57:904–908.

18. Ito N, Fukushima S, Hasegawa A, Shibata M, Ogiso T. Carcinogenecity of butylated hydroxylanisole in F 344 rats. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983. 70:343–347.

19. Jeon TW, Jo CH, Kim KH, Byun MW. Inhibitory effect on tyrosinase and xanthine oxidase, and nitrite scavenging activities of Schizandrae Fructus extract by gamma irradiation. Korean Journal of Food Preservation. 2002. 9:369–374.

20. Kalt W, Forney CF, Martin A, Prior RL. Antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, phenolics, and anthocyanins after fresh storage of small fruits. J Agric Food Chem. 1999. 47:4638–4644.

21. Kang YH, Park YK, Lee GD. The nitrite scavenging and electron donating ability of phenolic compounds. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1996. 28:232–239.

22. Kato FT, Puck TT. Mutagenesis by carcinogenic nitroso compounds. J Cell Physiol. 1971. 78:139–144.

23. Kilani S, Ammar RB, Bouhlel I, Abdelwahed A, Hayder N, Mahmoud A, Ghedira K, Chekir-Ghedira L. Investigation of extracts from (Tunisian) Cyperus rotundus as antimutagens and radical scavengers. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005. 20:478–484.

24. Komali AS, Zheng Z, Shetty K. A mathematical model for the growth kinetics and synthesis of phenolics in oregano (Origanum vulgare) shoot cultures inoculated with Pseudomonas species. Process Biochem. 1999. 35:227–235.

25. Ma M, Hong CL, An SQ, Li B. Seasonal, spatial, and interspecific variation in quercetin in apocynum venetum and poacynum hendersonii, Chinese traditional herbal teas. J Agric Food Chem. 2003. 51:2390–2393.

26. Moller JKS, Madsen HL, Altonen T, Skibsted LH. Dittany (Origanum dictamnus) as a source of water-extractable antioxidants. Food Chem. 1999. 64:215–219.

27. Noh KS, Yang MO, Cho EJ. Nitrite scavenging effect of Umbelligeraeceae. Korean Journal of Food and Cookery Science. 2002. 18:8–12.

28. Ordonez AAL, Gomez JD, Vattuone MA, Isla MI. Antioxidant activities of Sechium edule (jacq.) Swartz extracts. Food Chem. 2006. 97:452–458.

29. Osawa T. Novel Natural Antioxidants for Utilization in Food and Biological Systems. 1994. Tokyo. Japan: Japan Scientific Scoieties Press;241–251.

30. Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reactions: antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition. 1986. 44:307–315.

31. Singh RP, Murthy KNC, Jayaprakasha GK. Studies on the antioxidant activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel and seed extracts using in vitro models. J Agric Food Chem. 2002. 50:81–86.

32. Siriwardhana N, Lee KW, Kim SH, Ha WJ, Jeon YJ. Antioxidant activity of Hizikia fusiformis on reactive oxygen scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibition. Food Science and Technology International. 2003. 9:339–346.

33. Soares JR, Dins TCP, Cunha AP, Ameida LM. Antioxidant activity of some extracts of Thymus zygis. Free Radic Res. 1997. 26:469–478.

34. Sun HX, Qin F, Pan YJ. In vitro and in vivo immunosuppressive activity of Spica prunellae ethanol extract on the immune responses in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005. 101:31–36.

35. Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J Agric Food Chem. 1998. 46:4113–4117.

36. Yen GC, Chen HY. Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity. J Agric Food Chem. 1995. 43:27–32.

37. Zheng W, Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem. 2001. 49:5165–5170.

TOOLS

Similar articles