Abstract
In the root planning group(control), the complete open of dentinal tubule surface was accounted for 73.8%, the partial obliteration for 17.2% and the complete obliteration for 9.0%.
In the Gluma® desensitizer group (test I), the complete open of dentinal tubule surface was accounted for 23.6%, the partial obliteration for 42.8% and the complete obliteration for 33.6%.
In the MS coat® group (test II), the complete open of dentinal tubule surface was accounted for 19.2%, the partial obliteration for 45.6% and the complete obliteration for 35.2%.
The average number of open dentinal tubules in the control was significantly higher than in the testI and II(P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences between the test I and II.
The average number of the partially obliterated and the completely blocked dentinal tubules in the control was significantly lower than the testI and II(P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences between the test I and II.