Journal List > Korean J Nutr > v.45(2) > 1043920

Lee, Yoo, Yang, Kim, and Cho: Effect of an abdominal obesity management program on dietary intake, stress index, and waist to hip ratio in abdominally obese women - Focus on comparison of the WHR decrease and WHR increase groups -

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of an abdominal obesity management program on dietary intake, stress index, and waist to hip ratio (WHR) in abdominally obese women. The subjects were 195 adult abdominally obese women (WHR ≥ 0.80) who had been participating in a nutrition education (total of nine times) and dietary habits and life style modification programs (total of six times) for 12 weeks. The abdominal obesity management program focused on the nutrition provided by breakfast, lunch, and dinner, proper dietary habits, and practices to improve life style. The subjects were divided into a WHR decrease group and a WHR increase group according to changes in the WHR. Daily nutrient intake was assessed with a 3-day food record, body measurements and blood vessel age, stress index, and a health index that were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. After the intervention, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, WHR, and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the WHR decrease group. Energy intake increased from 1486.2 kcal to 1541.4 kcal with a significant improvement in nutrient density for animal protein, total fat, animal fat, fiber, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin E, and saturated fatty acids in the WHR decrease group. Additionally, dietary diversity increased significantly in the WHR decrease group compared to that in the WHR increase group. The WHR decrease group showed a significant improvement in the stress and health indices. Changes in WHR were correlated with changes in nutrient intake (animal protein, total fat, animal fat, plant fat, fiber, calcium, iron, potassium, vitamin A, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin C, and folate) and medical index profiles (stress and indices) adjusted for age, birth status, baseline BMI, and baseline WHR. These results show that an abdominal obesity management program was effective not only for reducing the WHR but also to improve dietary intake and the stress index in abdominally obese women.

REFERENCES

1). Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Dietary diversity score is related to obesity and abdominal adiposity among Iranian female youth. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14(1):62–69.
crossref
2). Al-Rethaiaa AS, Fahmy AE, Al-Shwaiyat NM. Obesity and eating habits among college students in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study. Nutr J. 2010; 9:39.
crossref
3). Baek YA, Kim KN, Lee YA, Chang N. The effect of nutrition education on visceral fat reduction and diet quality in postmenopausal women. Korean J Nutr. 2008; 41(7):634–644.
4). Kim HR, Kang YH, Kwak NS, Kang EJ, Kim EJN. Trends in obesity and comprehensive policy strategy to prevent obesity in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2009.
5). Yang SW. The effects of combined exercise program on blood lipids, laptin, and cortisol stress hormone concentration in obesity middle-aged women. J Sport Leis Stud. 2008; 33(2):795–802.
crossref
6). Garrow JS. Obesity and related diseases. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1988. 12–14.
7). Nam JH. Effect of weight control program on obesity degree and blood lipid levels among middle-aged obese women. Korean J Food Nutr. 2006; 19(1):70–78.
8). Lee KS, Lee J. Effect of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet with aerobic exercise on body composition and blood lipid profiles in obese individuals. Korean J Exerc Nutr. 2010; 14(1):17–21.
9). Jacobs EJ, Newton CC, Wang Y, Patel AV, McCullough ML, Campbell PT, Thun MJ, Gapstur SM. Waist circumference and all-cause mortality in a large US cohort. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(15):1293–1301.
crossref
10). Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, Kahn R. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping America’s health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NA-ASO, the Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(6):1647–1652.
crossref
11). Heo YH, Kim EJ, Seo HS, Kim SM, Choi KM, Hwang TG, Cho GJ, Park Y. The effect of 16 week exercise program on abdominal fat, serum lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure in obese women. Korean J Obes. 2010; 19(1):16–23.
12). Oh IS, Ahn GS, Kang BH. Women’s diet practice by their lifestyles. Rev Ind Manage. 2005; 17(2):87–111.
13). Neovius M, Johansson K, Rössner S. Head-to-head studies evaluating efficacy of pharmaco-therapy for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2008; 9(5):420–427.
crossref
14). Choi MS. Effects of nutrition education and exercise intervention on health and diet quality of middle-aged women. Korean J Nutr. 2009; 42(1):48–58.
15). Wu H, Pan A, Yu Z, Qi Q, Lu L, Zhang G, Yu D, Zong G, Zhou Y, Chen X, Tang L, Feng Y, Zhou H, Li H, Demark-Wahnefried W, Hu FB, Lin X. Lifestyle counseling and supplementation with flaxseed or walnuts influence the management of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2010; 140(11):1937–1942.
crossref
16). Keränen AM, Savolainen MJ, Reponen AH, Kujari ML, Linde-man SM, Bloigu RS, Laitinen JH. The effect of eating behavior on weight loss and maintenance during a lifestyle intervention. Prev Med. 2009; 49(1):32–38.
crossref
17). Kim YH, Yoo JY, Lee EG, Kim KB, Jo DH, Hwang JY. Effects of a dietary supplement consisting of Phaseolus vulgaris and Garcinia cambogia (HCA) on the lipid level and body weight. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2004; 33(3):518–522.
18). Lee SH, Chang N. Effectiveness of nutrition education on dietary habits and diet quality in the weight loss and weight gain groups in college women. Korean J Nutr. 2007; 40(5):463–474.
19). Jin HM, Kwon JS. The change of physical fitness, percent body fat and waist hip ratio on the elderly people using exercise program in leisure-welfare facility. J Korean Phys Edu Assoc Girls Women. 2010; 24(1):107–118.
20). Friedenreich CM, Woolcott CG, McTiernan A, Terry T, Brant R, Ballard-Barbash R, Irwin ML, Jones CA, Boyd NF, Yaffe MJ, Campbell KL, McNeely ML, Karvinen KH, Courneya KS. Adiposity changes after a 1-year aerobic exercise intervention among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011; 35(3):427–435.
crossref
21). Ahn HJ, Cho YO, Kwon HR, Ku YH, Koo BK, Han KA, Min KW. The effects of low-calorie diets on abdominal visceral fat, muscle mass, and dietary quality in obese type 2 diabetic subjects. Korean Diabetes J. 2009; 33(6):526–536.
crossref
22). Baker S, Jerums G, Proietto J. Effects and clinical potential of very-low-calorie diets (VLCDs) in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009; 85(3):235–242.
crossref
23). Zwiauer KF, Mueller T, Widhalm K. Resting metabolic rate in obese children before, during and after weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992; 16(1):11–16.
24). Tounian P, Frelut ML, Parlier G, Abounaufal C, Aymard N, Vein-berg F, Fontaine JL, Girardet JP. Weight loss and changes in energy metabolism in massively obese adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999; 23(8):830–837.
crossref
25). Lissner L, Odell PM, D’Agostino RB, Stokes J 3rd, Kreger BE, Belanger AJ, Brownell KD. Variability of body weight and health outcomes in the Framingham population. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(26):1839–1844.
crossref
26). Chang UJ, Lim KA, Han YB. Effect of nutrition education on weight control program. Korean J Food Nutr. 1999; 12(2):177–183.
27). Kim MS, Choi MS, Kim KN. Effect of nutritional education and exercise intervention on reducing and maintaining weight in obese women. Korean J Community Nutr. 2007; 12(1):80–89.
28). Kang YH, Yi KO, Ha EH, Kim JY, Kim WY. Evaluation of short term weight control program for female college students. Korean J Nutr. 2004; 37(6):493–501.
29). Park BN, Lee HJ, Park JS. The effects of health management program on BMI, obesity stress, self-esteem and depression in female college students. J Korean Soc Health Inf Health Stat. 2007; 32(2):1–12.
30). Bray GA. Is dietary fat important? Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 93(3):481–482.
crossref
31). Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels SR, D’Alessio DA. A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88(4):1617–1623.
crossref
32). Yoo JS, Kim EJ, Lee SJ. The effects of a comprehensive life style modification program on glycemic control and stress response in type 2 diabetes. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2006; 36(5):751–760.
crossref
33). Oh HJ. Obesity and trace mineral. Med Postgrad. 2007; 35(1):25–27.
34). Lim MR, Kang SM. The effect of functional foods on the abdominal obesity. J Cosmetol Sci. 2010; 6(2):95–104.
35). Papakonstantinou E, Flatt WP, Huth PJ, Harris RB. High dietary calcium reduces body fat content, digestibility of fat, and serum vitamin D in rats. Obes Res. 2003; 11(3):387–394.
crossref
36). Ock SM, Ju SY, Choi WS, Park HM, Jung KI, Song CJ. Association of sleep hours with obesity in adult women. Korean J Obes. 2008; 17(3):110–116.
37). Tuomilehto H, Peltonen M, Partinen M, Lavigne G, Eriksson JG, Herder C, Aunola S, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Ilanne-Parikka P, Uusitupa M, Tuomilehto J, J Lindström. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Sleep duration, lifestyle intervention, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in impaired glucose tolerance: The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(11):1965–1971.
38). The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans, 1st revision. Seoul. 2010.
39). Lee HS, Lee JW, Chang N, Kim JM. The effect of nutrition education and excercise program on body composition and dietary intakes, blood lipid and physical fitness in obese women. Korean J Nutr. 2009; 42(8):759–769.
crossref
40). Moon SJ, Kim HS, Kim JH, Park GS, You YH. The effect of weight control on obese women. Korean J Nutr. 1995; 28(8):759–770.
41). Hong HR, Kang HS, An EN. Relationship of obesity indices with daily physical activity and dietary intake in high school women. Korean J Exerc Nutr. 2007; 11(3):189–197.

Table 1.
Content of comprehensive abdominal obesity management program
Week Session Contents
1 Desirable diet for healthy   • Desirable diet for abdominal obesity management
2 Nutrition education Sodium and obesity • Association of sodium with obesity • How to eat for salinity control
2 Dietary habits modification Important on three meals a day and breakfast • Make sure to have brown rice with beans • Do not have an unbalanced diet or white flour
3 Nutrition education Calcium and Magnesium • Calcium and magnesium necessary for muscle contraction and relaxation • Cooking method to improve absorption in body
  Dietary habits modification Substitutional foods • Use of substitutional foods
4 Nutrition education Fiber • Understand the function of fiber and food sources • How to eat fiber (Avoid eating grind or crushed)
4 Life style modification Stress management • Association of stress with abdominal obesity • How to manage stress
5 Nutrition education Burning fat and Vitamin C • Understand the process of burning fat • Food sources of vitamin C to help fat burning
6 Life style modification Sleeping habits • Association of sleep hours with abdominal obesity (Hormonal change of Leptin and Ghrelin) • Dietary habits for taking a deep sleep
7 Nutrition education Blood glucose control and glycemic index • Association of blood glucose with abdominal obesity • How to eat for blood glucose management
8 Dietary habits modification Control of appetite • Do not have overeating and binge-eating • Importance and the ways to select nutritious snacks
9 Nutrition education Alpha lipoic acid, Chrome and Zinc • Understand the function of alpha lipoic acid, Cr and Zn • Main food sources (Avoid stress and excessive intake of copper)
10 Dietary habits modification Eat leisurely • Eat slowly for dopamine secretion • Do have Solid food
11 Nutrition education Essential fatty acid Cholesterol • Separate the bad fats and the good fats • Do not eat foods containing a lot of cholesterol
12 Importance of weight maint tenance • Keep the dietary habits prevent to the weight cycling
Table 2.
General characteristic of the subjects
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95) Significance 1)
Age (years), mean 27.8 ± 5.6 2) 28.2 ± 6.9 NS 3)
Waist hip ratio 0.88 ± 0.04 0.88 ± 0.05 NS
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 2.8 23.6 ± 3.1 NS
Employment status      
  Employed 96 (96.0) 4) 86 (90.5) χ2 = 0.221 df = 1
  Unemployed 4 ( 4.0) 9 ( 9.5) df = 1 p = 0.367
Experience of child birth      
  Yes 21 (21.0) 15 (15.8) χ2 = 0.745 df = 1
  Not 79 (79.0) 80 (84.2) p = 0.477
Marital status      
  Married 24 (24.0) 19 (20.0) χ2 = 0.032 df = 1
  Single 76 (76.0) 76 (80.0) p = 0.490
History of disease      
  Yes 24 (24.0) 21 (22.1) χ2 = 0.219 df = 1
  No 76 (76.0) 74 (77.9) p = 0.320
Regularity of meal      
  Regular 18 (18.0) 15 (15.8) χ2 = 0.195 df = 1
  Irregular 82 (82.0) 80 (84.2) p = 0.320
Sleeping time (hours/day)      
  ≥7 39 (39.0) 46 (48.4)  
  5-6 43 (43.0) 38 (40.0) χ2 = 1.865 df = 3
  <5 9 ( 9.0) 7 ( 7.4) p = 0.727
  Irregularity 9 ( 9.0) 9 ( 4.2)  
Physical activity (kcal) 299.2 ± 91.0 322.9 ± 103.6 NS

1) Chi-square test between the two groups

2) Values are Mean ± SD

3) NS: Not significant by Student t-test (p < 0.05)

4) Values are expressed as frequency (percentage)

Table 3.
Change in body measurements in WHR decrease and WHR increase groups
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95)
Baseline Final % Change Baseline Final % Change
Height (cm) 161.7 ± 4.4 1) 161.7 ± 4.4 - 160.8 ± 7.2 160.8 ± 7.2 -
Weight (kg) 60.9 ± 8.3 58.2 ± 7.7∗∗∗2),†††3) -4.4†† 61.1 ± 9.7 61.8 ± 8.7 1.1
Waist circumference (cm) 85.1 ± 7.9 82.0 ± 7.0∗∗∗†† -3.6†† 84.1 ± 8.3 85.3 ± 8.7 1.4
Hip circumference (cm) 96.7 ± 15.2 94.3 ± 14.6∗∗∗†† -2.5†† 96.3 ± 14.9 96.7 ± 17.8 0.4
Waist-hip ratio 0.88 ± 0.04 0.87 ± 0.05∗∗∗ -1.1 0.87 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.08 1.1
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 2.8 22.3 ± 2.5∗∗∗†† -4.3†† 23.6 ± 3.1 23.9 ± 5.4 1.3

1) Values are Mean ± SD

2) Significantly different between baseline and final in each groups by paired t-test

p < 0.05

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

3) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity

p < 0.05

†† p < 0.01

††† p < 0.001)

Table 4.
Change in daily nutrient intakes per 1,000kcal in WHR decrease and WHR increase groups
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95)
Baseline Final % Change Baseline Final % Change
Total energy (kcal) 1486.2 ± 275.11) 1541.4 ± 304.7∗∗∗2) 3.7 1589.3 ± 321.2 1580.9 ± 369.0 -0.5
Total protein (g) 45.9 ± 8.9 47.7 ± 4.93) 3.9 43.9 ± 5.9 45.6 ± 6.5∗∗ 3.9
 Animal protein (g) 22.3 ± 7.6 21.6 ± 8.4∗∗ -3.1 20.9 ± 8.9 22.5 ± 10.5 7.7
 Plant protein (g) 23.6 ± 4.6 26.1 ± 5.4∗∗∗ 10.6 23.0 ± 4.8 23.1 ± 6.4 0.4
Total fat (g) 27.4 ± 5.9 27.3 ± 3.13) -0.4†† 27.8 ± 7.1 29.9 ± 3.8 7.6
 Animal fat (g) 12.9 ± 5.8 11.6 ± 6.6†† -10.1†† 12.8 ± 9.3 14.6 ± 9.6 14.1
 Plant fat (g) 14.5 ± 5.7 15.8 ± 4.8 9.0 15.0 ± 4.2 15.3 ± 6.1 2.0
Carbohydrate (g) 146.4 ± 11.0 147.0 ± 12.5 0.4 146.5 ± 11.7 142.1 ± 9.8 -3.1
Fiber (g) 14.5 ± 1.9 17.3 ± 2.4∗∗ 19.3†† 15.8 ± 2.4 16.1 ± 2.2 1.9
Calcium (g) 376.9 ± 85.0 384.9 ± 77.2∗∗†† 2.1††† 395.9 ± 93.2 334.3 ± 66.2∗∗ -15.6
Phosphorus (mg) 673.1 ± 85.9 695.9 ± 85.3∗∗dagger; 3.4†† 680.3 ± 95.8 673.9 ± 82.1∗∗ -0.9
Iron (mg) 9.1 ± 1.0 11.0 ± 1.5 20.9 8.6 ± 1.2 10.3 ± 1.6∗∗ 19.8
Sodium (mg) 2681.9 ± 588.6 2794.7 ± 567.9 4.2 2609.2 ± 550.6 2739.9 ± 657.8∗∗ 5.0
Potassium (mg) 1922.2 ± 277.0 2149.0 ± 333.1∗∗∗ 11.8 1811.9 ± 315.1 2086.2 ± 286.2∗∗∗ 15.1
Zinc (mg) 5.8 ± 0.6 5.9 ± 0.9 1.7††† 5.5 ± 0.8 4.6 ± 0.6∗∗ -16.4
Vitamin A (µgRE) 677.9 ± 148.2 793.3 ± 245.0∗∗∗ 17.0 611.3 ± 109.8 751.3 ± 175.9∗∗ 22.9
Vitamin B1 (mg) 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0 0.7 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 0
Vitamin B2 (mg) 0.7 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2∗∗ 14.3 0.7 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.1 14.3
Vitamin B6 (mg) 1.4 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2∗∗ 14.3 1.4 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2 7.1
Niacin (mgNE) 10.6 ± 1.6 11.6 ± 2.1 9.4 10.9 ± 1.9 11.2 ± 2.8 2.8
Vitamin C (mg) 76.3 ± 22.3 87.3 ± 23.8∗∗,† 14.4 67.0 ± 26.3 70.5 ± 23.2 5.2
Folate (µgDFE) 221.1 ± 45.1 260.5 ± 36.6∗∗∗ 17.8 195.3 ± 32.3 254.3 ± 40.8∗∗ 30.2
Vitamin E (mg) 10.2 ± 2.1 11.2 ± 2.1 9.8 10.3 ± 2.9 10.6 ± 1.5 2.9
Cholesterol (mg) 188.7 ± 109.6 177.0 ± 95.0∗∗ -6.2 196.1 ± 96.2 192.1 ± 156.8 -2.0
Saturated fatty acid (g) 5.5 ± 3.4 4.9 ± 2.9 -10.9 5.0 ± 2.6 5.1 ± 2.9 2
Monounsaturated fatty acid (g) 6.9 ± 3.8 6.6 ± 3.4 -4.3 6.6 ± 3.3 6.6 ± 3.3 0
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (g) 6.6 ± 3.2 7.2 ± 3.4 9.1 6.7 ± 3.0 6.8 ± 3.4 1.5

1) Values are Mean ± SD

2) Significantly different between baseline and final in each groups by paired t-test

p < 0.05

∗∗ p < 0.01

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

3) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity

p < 0.05

†† p < 0.01

††† p < 0.001)

Table 5.
Change in INQ in the WHR decrease and WHR increase groups
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95)
Baseline Final Baseline Final
INQ 1)
  Protein 2.0 ± 0.4 2) 2.1 ± 0.4 3) 1.9 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.3
  Calcium 0.8 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.2∗∗∗ 0.7 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.2
  Phosphorus 1.1 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.2∗∗ 1.0 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.3
  Iron 1.0 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.34) 1.0 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3
  Vitamin A 1.5 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 1.2∗∗, 1.3 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.9
  Vitamin B1 1.4 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.4∗∗, 1.5 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.5
  Vitamin B2 1.3 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.4∗∗ 1.4 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.4
  Niacin 1.4 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.5
  Vitamin C 1.3 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 0.8∗∗, 1.1 ± 1.0 1.2 ± 1.1
MAR 5) 0.86 0.04 0.96 0.02∗∗∗, 0.87 0.04 0.91 0.02
Meal distribution
Breakfast (%) 20.8 ± 3.4 26.3 ± 4.6∗∗ 20.8 ± 4.1 25.6 ± 4.9
Lunch (%) 31.6 ± 5.1 38.2 ± 6.5 32.1 ± 4.9 31.6 ± 4.1
Dinner (%) 37.8 ± 6.1 32.0 ± 5.2 35.3 ± 5.7 34.1 ± 5.1
Snack (%) 9.8 ± 1.9 3.5 ± 0.3∗∗ 10.2 ± 2.0 8.7 ± 1.9

1) INQ: Index of nutritional quality

2) Values are Mean ± SD

3) Significantly different between baseline and final in each groups by paired t-test

p < 0.05

∗∗ p < 0.01

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

4) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity

p < 0.05)

5) MAR (Mean adequacy ratio): sum of NAR (NAR over 1 is considered 1)/n

Table 6.
Change of dietary diversity in the WHR decrease and WHR increase groups
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95)
Baseline Final Baseline Final
Meat and meat products 1.6 ± 1.1 1) 1.6 ± 1.2 1.7 ± 1.4 1.5 ± 1.0∗∗
Fishes and shellfish 1.7 ± 1.3 1.8 ± 1.4∗∗2) 1.8 ± 1.2 1.7 ± 1.5
Eggs and egg products 1.0 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.8∗∗ 0.8 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 0.9∗∗
Milk and milk products 0.6 ± 0.6 0.6 ± 0.43) 0.6 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.8
Fat and oil 4.7 ± 2.1 4.5 ± 2.7 4.0 ± 2.1 4.2 ± 2.1
Cereal and cereal products 5.2 ± 2.3 5.4 ± 1.8 5.0 ± 1.8 4.8 ± 1.5
Potatoes and starch products 0.6 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 1.0 0.6 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 1.1∗∗
Beans and bean products 1.6 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 1.7∗∗ 1.6 ± 1.4 1.8 ± 1.4
Nut seeds and products 1.1 ± 1.4 1.3 ± 1.7 1.1 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 1.1
Vegetables 16.1 ± 5.9 19.0 ± 9.1∗∗∗ 16.6 ± 7.1 17.1 ± 8.3∗∗
Mushrooms 0.5 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.8 0.4 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 0.6
Seaweeds 1.1 ± 1.1 0.9 ± 0.9∗∗ 1.1 ± 1.4 0.8 ± 0.9∗∗
Fruits 0.6 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.7
Sugar and sugar products 1.7 ± 1.3 1.5 ± 1.1∗∗ 1.6 ± 1.2 2.0 ± 1.3∗∗∗
Seasoning 9.0 ± 5.2 9.3 ± 4.6 9.1 ± 4.3 8.8 ± 4.7
Total 47.1 ± 27.5 50.4 ± 32.0∗∗ 46.6 ± 27.5 46.7 ± 27.8

1) Values are Mean ± SD

2) Significantly different between baseline and final in each groups by paired t-test

p < 0.05

∗∗ p < 0.01

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

3) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity

p < 0.05)

Table 7.
Change in medical index profiles 1) in the WHR decrease and WHR increase groups
WHR decrease (n = 100) WHR increase (n = 95)
Baseline Final % Change Baseline Final % Change
Age 27.8 ± 5.6 2) - 28.2 ± 6.9 -
Blood vessel age 31.9 ± 6.8 31.7 ± 8.1 -0.6 30.9 ± 6.0 30.8 ± 6.1 -0.3
Stress index 6.5 ± 3.5 6.2 ± 2.8∗∗∗3)††4) -4.6†† 6.5 ± 4.3 6.5 ± 2.1 0
Health index 72.7 ± 11.5 74.2 ± 9.7∗∗ 2.1 73.4 ± 8.7 73.1 ± 9.9 -0.4

1) Blood vessel age, stress index and health index

2) Values are Mean ± SD

3) Significantly different between baseline and final in each groups by paired t-test

p < 0.05

∗∗ p < 0.01

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

4) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity († p < 0.05

†† p < 0.01)

Table 8.
Pearson's correlation coefficients between changes1) waist hip ratio and changes in nutrient density and medical index
Variables Unadjusted2) Adjusted 3)
Nutrient density changes (%)
 Total protein -0.288 -0.274
 Animal protein 0.359∗∗ 0.314
 Plant protein -0.310 -0.378
 Total fat 0.429∗∗ 0.400††
 Animal fat 0.645∗∗ 0.611
 Plant fat -0.321 -0.300
 Carbohydrate 0.141 0.119
 Fiber -0.426∗∗∗ -0.327††
 Calcium -0.212∗∗∗ -0.279
 Phosphorus -0.212 -0.196
 Iron -0.389∗∗ -0.319
 Sodium 0.222 0.270
 Potassium 0.374∗∗∗ -0.378†††
 Zinc -0.411∗∗∗ -0.401†††
 Vitamin A -0.496∗∗ -0.326
 Vitamin B1 -0.126 -0.215
 Vitamin B2 -0.314 -0.301
 Vitamin B6 -0.315∗∗ -0.264
 Niacin -0.298 -0.199
 Vitamin C -0.375∗∗ -0.397
 Folate -0.418∗∗∗ -0.392††
 Vitamin E -0.279 -0.251
 Cholesterol 0.300 0.297
 Saturated fatty acid 0.415∗∗ 0.350
 Monounsaturated fatty acid 0.315 0.328
 Polyunsaturated fatty acid -0.213 -0.189
Medical index profiles changes (%)
 Blood vessel age 0.125 0.137
 Stress index 0.428∗∗∗ 0.398††
 Health index -0.326 -0.325

1) Change, %: [(final-baseline)/baseline × 100]

2) Pearson's correlation coefficient

p < 0.05

∗∗ p < 0.01

∗∗∗ p < 0.001)

3) Significantly different by GLM univariate model test between WHR decrease group and WHR increase group; adjusted for age, birth status, baseline WHR, baseline BMI, physical activity

p < 0.05

†† p < 0.01

††† p < 0.001)

TOOLS
Similar articles