Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to suggest the strategies for improvement of home-delivered meal services for the elderly, to identify reasons for recipients to get started with the services and to evaluate the attitude, acceptability and adaptation of recipients to the services from the perspective of life context.
Methods
The data was collected through face-to-face in-depth interviews with eighteen low-income elderly recipients of home-delivered meals and analyzed using a qualitative research method.
Results
The results were deduced as four themes which comprised of long-term vulnerable socioeconomic contexts resulted in entry to the services, conflicting acceptability to the services, passive adaptation to taking the services, and positive practices to cope with supplement free meals or other services. The service participation was initiated because of a combination of prolonged, vulnerable socioeconomic contexts, including poverty and unexpected life events such as diseases, disability, living alone, aging and unemployment. With regard to taking the services, conflicting acceptability was observed: positive aspects including saving living cost and good quality of meals, and negative aspects including lack of a tailored service and feeling of stigma. Although the recipients needed an individualized service, they did not express their needs and demands for the services and they accepted the unavailability as an accustomed, prolonged vulnerable socioeconomic context. With regard to lack of tailored services, either self-solution such as modification of eating patterns or community-based network and services were used.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2013R1A1A1060704).
References
1. Administration on Aging. Nutrition Services (OAA Title IIIC). 2014. cited January 20, 2014. Available from http://www.aoa.gov/AoA_Programs/HCLTC/Nutrition_Services/index.aspx.
2. Baek HY. A qualitative study on the experience of poverty among the poor elderly people who live alone. Korean J Soc Welf Stud. 2006; 31:5–39.
3. Bartlett S, Burstein N, Andrews M. Food stamp program access study: eligible nonparticipants. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture;2004.
4. Burstein NR, Patrabansh S, Hamilton WL, Siegel SY. Understanding the determinants of supplemental nutrition assistance program participation. Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture;2009.
5. Department of Health. Commonwealth (HACC) program. 2008. cited January 21, 2014. Available from http://health.gov.au/hacc.
6. Edfors E, Westergren A. Home-living elderly people's views on food and meals. J Aging Res. 2012; 2012:761291.
7. Food Research and Action Center. Access and access barriers to getting food stamps: a review of the literature. Washington D.C.: Food Research and Action Center;2008.
8. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine: Chicago;1967. p. 237–250.
9. Kim K, Frongillo EA. Participation in food assistance programs modifies the relation of food insecurity with weight and depression in elders. J Nutr. 2007; 137(4):1005–1010.
10. Kim K, Kim MK, Shin YJ. The concept and measurement of food security. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008; 41(6):387–396.
11. Kim K, Kim MK, Shin YJ. Household food insecurity and its characteristics in Korea. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2009; 29(2):268–292.
12. Kim DS. Qualitative Researching (translated version). 2nd ed. Nanam: Seoul;2010. p. 213–250. original written by Mason J.
13. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. International comparison of old-age income and poverty in Korea health welfare. Issue Focus. 2009; 9:1–8.
14. Lauren HN. Can food stamps help to reduce Medicare spending on diabetes? Econ Hum Biol. 2011; 9(1):1–13.
15. Lee JS, Frongillo EA. Understanding needs is important for assessing the impact of food assistance program participation on nutritional and health status in U.S. elderly persons. J Nutr. 2001; 131(3):765–773.
16. Locher JL, Ritchie CS, Robinson CO, Roth DL, West DS, Burgio KL. A multidimensional approach to understanding under-eating in homebound older adults: the importance of social factors. Gerontologist. 2008; 48(2):223–234.
17. Locher JL, Robinson CO, Roth DL, Ritchie CS, Burgio KL. The effect of the presence of others on caloric intake in homebound older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60(11):1475–1478.
18. McConnell S, Ponza M. The reaching the working poor and poor elderly study: what we learned and recommendations for future research. 1999. cited December, 1999. Available from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/~/media/publications/PDFs/reach.pdf.
19. Millen BE, Ohls JC, Ponza M, McCool AC. The elderly nutrition program: an effective national framework for preventive nutrition interventions. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102(2):234–240.
20. Margetts BM, Thompson RL, Elia M, Jackson AA. Prevalence of risk of undernutrition is associated with poor health status in older people in the UK. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57(1):69–74.
21. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Survey on the current livelihood status and the welfare need in the elderly 2008. 2009.
22. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Elderly health and welfare business guide. 2013. cited January 20, 2014. Available from http://www.mw.go.kr.
23. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Total care service for the elderly 2013. 2013.
24. Park JY, Lee KE, Yi NY, Kwak TK. Clients' handling and consumption of home-delivered meals at home and their perceptions on home-delivered meal services for older adults. Korean J Community Nutr. 2010; 15(3):379–392.
25. Participle. The circle movement. 2014. cited August 16, 2014. Available from http://www.participle.net/projects/view/5/101/.
26. Rodriguez E, Frongillo EA, Chandra P. Do social programmes contribute to mental well-being? The long-term impact of unemployment on depression in the United States. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30(1):163–170.
27. Splett PL, Weddle DO. The elderly nutrition program: contribution to the health and independence of older adults. Florida: National policy and resource center on nutrition and aging;1999.
28. Shin GR. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (translated version). Seoul: Hyunmoon;2001. p. 91–110. original written by Strauss A and Corbin JM.
29. Suda Y, Marske CE, Flaherty JH, Zdrodowski K, Morley JE. Examining the effect of intervention to nutritional problems of the elderly living in an inner city area: a pilot project. J Nutr Health Aging. 2001; 5(2):118–123.
30. Statistics Korea. Statistics on the elderly population 2010. 2010.
31. Seo S, Yu E, Kim OY. Qualitative study on home delivery meal services for the elderly. J Nutr Health. 2013; 46(6):589–596.
32. Teshima T, Hirakawa A. Shokuiku for the elderly. Japan: Cabinet Office;2010.
33. United States Government Accountability Office. Food assistance: options for improving nutrition for older Americans. 2000. cited August 17, 2000. Available from http://www.gao.gov/assets/240/230545.pdf.
34. Workers' collective. Fukushi-club. 2014. cited August 1, 2014. Available from http://fukushi-club.net/index.html.