Journal List > Korean J Community Nutr > v.17(5) > 1038380

Yeon, Hong, and Bae: A Study on Nutritional Status and Dietary Quality of University Students by Body Image

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the satisfaction of body image, dietary habits, nutrition intake and dietary quality according to body image of university students (n = 290). The subjects (male = 178, female = 112) were classified to lean, normal and overweight/fat groups according to body image. The weight, body fat and body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the students who recognized their body image as 'overweight/fat'. The satisfaction of body image, interest of weight control and experience of weight control were significantly higher in students who recognized their body image as 'normal' in both the male and female subjects. The intakes of nutrients, dietary habits and life styles were not different according to body image. In the male subjects, the niacin intake density, the nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) of vitamin B1 and the dietary diversity score (DDS) in the students who recognized their body image as 'overweight/fat' were significantly lower than in students who recognized their body image as 'normal' and 'lean'. In female subjects, no significant differences in nutrient intakes, NAR, MAR and DDS were observed according to body image. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed for further assessment of the relationship between nutritional status/diet quality and body image in university students.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Dietary diversity score (DDS) of subjects by body image.
kjcn-17-543-g001
Table 1
Age and anthropometric measurements of subjects by gender
kjcn-17-543-i001

1) Mean ± SD

2) Not significant

Table 2
Age and anthropometric measurements of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i002

1) Significance as determined by GLM test

2) Significance as determined by t-test

3) Mean ± SD

4) Not significant

5) Means with different superscripts (a~c) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 3
Satisfaction with body image and interest of weight control in subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i003

1) Significance as determined by χ2 test

2) %

Table 4
Life style and dietary habits of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i004

1) Significance as determined by χ2 test, 2) %, 3) Not significant, 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Significance as determined by GLM test (Not significant), 6) Significance as determined by t-test (Not significant), 7) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 5
Mean daily energy and nutrient intakes of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i005

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant, 5) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 6
Food intakes from each food group of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i006

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant

Table 7
NAR and MAR of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i007

1) Significance as determined by GLM test, 2) Significance as determined by t-test, 3) Mean ± SD, 4) Not significant, 5) Means with different superscripts (a~b) within a row are significantly different from each at α = 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test

Table 8
Distribution of food group intake pattern (GMVFD)1) of subjects by body image
kjcn-17-543-i008

1) GMVFD: grains, meats, vegetables, fruits, dairys food group

1: food group(s) present, 0: food group (s) absent

For example, GMVFD = 11111 denotes that all food group (grains, meats, vegetables, fruits, dairys food group) were consumed

References

1. Bae YJ, Kim EY, Yeon JY, Cho HK, Lee JS, Kim MH, Kim MH. Evaluation of dietary behavior, nutrient and food intake status, and dietary quality based on Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) in female university students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2010. 20(4):491–501.
2. Chin JH, Chang KJ. College students' attitude toward body weight control, health-related lifestyle and dietary behavior by self-perception on body image and obesity index. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2005. 34(10):1559–1565.
3. Chung HK, Lee HY. The concepts of weight control and dietary behaviors in high school seniors. Korean J Nutr. 2010. 43(6):607–619.
4. Hong MS, Pak HO, Sohn CY. A study on food behaviors and nutrient intakes according to body mass index and body image recognition in female university students from Incheon. Korean J Food Nutr. 2011. 24(3):386–395.
5. Jin YH, You KH. A study on the eating habit and eating out behavior of the university students in the Gyeonggi area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2010. 15(5):687–693.
6. Kant AK, Block G, Schatzkin A, Ziegler RG, Nestle M. Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976-1980. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991. 91(12):1526–1531.
7. Kant AK. Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996. 96(8):785–791.
8. Kim KH. Comparisons of dietary, living habits and blood parameters in underweight and overweight university students. Korean J Food Cult. 2006. 21(4):366–374.
9. Kim MH, Jeong ES, Kim EJ, Chol HK, Bae YJ, Choi MK. Night eating status of university students in partial area of Chungnam. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2011. 21(4):563–576.
10. Kim SY, Lee HM, Song KH. Body image recognition and dietary behaviors of college students according to the body mass index. Korean J Community Nutr. 2007. 12(1):3–12.
11. Krebs-Smith SM, Smiciklas-Wright H, Guthrie HA, Krebs-Smith J. The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987. 87(7):897–903.
12. Lee JH, Kim MS, O JH. A comparative study on perceptions of body image, body satisfaction, and dietary habits of beauty art major and non-major female college students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2007. 17(4):463–473.
13. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW]. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDCP]. Korea Health Statistics 2009: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES IV-3). 2010. Seoul:
14. Mirmiran P, Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. Dietary diversity score in adolescents - a good indicator of the nutritional adequacy of diets: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004. 13(1):56–60.
15. Park KA. Dietary habits, body weight satisfaction and eating disorders according to the body mass index of female university students in Kyungnam province. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2009. 19(6):891–908.
16. Ries CP, Daehler JL. Evaluation of the nutrient guide as a dietary assessment tool. J Am Diet Assoc. 1986. 86(2):228–233.
17. Szponar L, Rychlik E. Dietary intake elderly subjects in rural and urban area in Poland. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2002. 13(78):490–496.
18. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. 2010. Seoul:
19. World Health Organization. The asia-pacific perspective. Redefining obesity and its treatment. International Diabetes Institute [internet]. 2000. Sydney: Health communications Australia Pty Ltd.;Available from http://www.obesity.asiapacific.com/dafault.htm\.
20. Yeon JY, Bae YJ. Evaluation of nutrient and food intake status, and dietary quality -Focused on comparison with overweight and normal female university students-. Korean J Food Nutr. 2010. 23(4):453–461.
21. You JS, Chin JH, Chang KJ. Prevalence of constipation, bowel habits and nutrient intakes of college students in Incheon area. Korean J Nutr. 2009. 42(8):702–713.
TOOLS
Similar articles