Journal List > Ewha Med J > v.47(4) > 1516088872

Kim, Song, Moon, Lee, and Park: Reduced cardiovascular events through dynamic lifestyle modification in individuals with prediabetes or prehypertension in Korea: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract

Objectives: There is limited knowledge regarding the impact of lifestyle changes on cardiovascular events and mortality among individuals with prehypertension or prediabetes.
Methods: This was a serial retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Health Screening Cohort. The primary outcome considered in the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Results: A higher risk of MACE was found in men with prehypertension whose unhealthy lifestyle deteriorated (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.23; P=0.004), those who gained weight (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03–1.28; P=0.010), and those who began smoking (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17–1.55; P<0.001). Conversely, a reduced risk of MACE was observed in men with prehypertension who improved their unhealthy lifestyle, quit smoking, reduced alcohol consumption, or increased the frequency of physical activity. In men with prediabetes, the risk of MACE was higher in those whose unhealthy lifestyle worsened (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12–1.35; P<0.001), those who gained weight (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06–1.33; P=0.003), those who started smoking (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64; P<0.001), and those who decreased their physical activity frequency (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09–1.35; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Preventive lifestyle changes reduce cardiovascular events and mortality, particularly in men at risk of developing hypertension or type 2 diabetes.

Introduction

Background

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are well-known cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and decreased physical activity are established risk factors associated with hypertension or T2D [1,2]. Previous studies have highlighted that lifestyle modifications can significantly reduce mortality risks in patients with hypertension or T2D [3,4]. However, once patients are diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes, they often begin treatment with medication, which means that analyses on the effect of lifestyle modifications are very limited. Previous research has primarily focused on how one specific lifestyle change affects hypertension or T2D. Moreover, studies examining whether lifestyle modifications have a similar clinical effect on cardiovascular events or mortality in the prehypertension or prediabetes stages are somewhat scarce. For example, a weight loss of approximately 10 kg may reduce systolic blood pressure by between 5 and 20 mmHg [5]. Alcohol consumption is directly correlated with elevated blood pressure; thus, reducing alcohol intake is associated with lower blood pressure [6]. However, regardless of weight loss, engaging in at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week has been shown to reduce the incidence of T2D by 44% [7]. Furthermore, there are correlations among certain lifestyles, suggesting that individuals who engage in intensive exercise may be more inclined to quit smoking or drinking. Therefore, it is necessary to dynamically analyze the changes in various types of lifestyle modifications rather than focusing on a single type. Furthermore, lifestyle habits such as smoking, drinking, and exercise are influenced by gender. Typically, men are more likely to smoke and drink, leading to the hypothesis that the impact of rigorous management of unhealthy lifestyles on the occurrence of cardiovascular events varies between genders. The frequency and intensity of exercise also differ by gender.

Objectives

Thus, the present study investigated (1) how dynamic changes in lifestyle can affect cardiovascular events; (2) how various lifestyles change organically; (3) whether gender-specific lifestyle changes can affect the occurrence of cardiovascular events, specifically in relation to prehypertension or prediabetes.

Methods

Ethics statement

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Ewha Womans Medical College Mokdong Hospital (IRB no. EUMC-2021-11-029) and the NHIS Big Data Steering Department (NHIS-2022-2-197) granted approval for this study. As the NHIS data used were completely anonymous and handled in accordance with the Personal Data Protection Act, obtaining written consent from subjects was not required.

Study design

This is a nationwide, population-based cohort study. It has been described in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, which is available at: https://www.strobe-statement.org/.

Setting

In December 2022, the authors conducted a search on prediabetes and prehypertension within the National Health Insurance Service–Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) database. Prediabetes is defined by the presence of impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or a hemoglobin A1c level of 5.7%–6.4%, while prehypertension is characterized by a systolic pressure of 120 to 139 mmHg or a diastolic pressure of 80 to 89 mmHg at the initial health screening. The NHIS-HEALS database was established from a cohort of 514,866 Koreans, aged 40 to 79 in 2002, who were randomly selected to represent 10% of the national health screening subjects from 2002 to 2003.

Data source and study cohort

The source of data for this study was the Korean NHIS-HEALS, which is a nationwide population-based cohort. Detailed information on the cohort has already been published elsewhere [8]. Additional details on the study cohort can be found in the Supplement 1.

Participants (study population)

For this study, we constructed a sub-cohort based on the research hypothesis. Initially, we excluded subjects with inconsistent examination dates, resulting in a cohort of 514,795 individuals who had undergone at least one health screening between 2002 and 2003. Of these, 334,937 subjects who also participated in a health screening during the second period (2004–2005) were included. We designated the date of the second health screening as the index date (Fig. 1C). Subsequently, we excluded individuals with a history of specific conditions prior to the index date, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10): heart failure (ICD-10: I50, n=668); cerebrovascular accident (I60-I69, n=13,187); cardiovascular disease (CVD; I20-I25, I71, I72, n=25,528); or cancer (C00-C96, n=3,921). Additionally, we excluded individuals with missing lifestyle-related data (n=13; n=297,010).
Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of selection of the study population from the National Health Insurance Service database. (A) Prehypertension subgroup; (B) prediabetes subgroup; (C) overall schema of the study. NHIS, National Health Insurance Service; HF, heart failure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index.

emj-47-4-63-g1
Next, we defined cohorts for prediabetes and prehypertension. Detailed criteria used to define these cohorts are available in the Supplement 1. The prehypertension cohort included 95,152 subjects (60,084 men and 35,068 women), while the prediabetes cohort comprised 57,865 subjects (37,836 men and 20,029 women). The flow diagram illustrating the selection of the study population is displayed in Fig. 1A, B.

Outcome variables

The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke resulting from CVD. Hospital admission data were used to identify instances of CVD, including MI (ICD-10: I21), stroke (ICD-10: I60–I69), and cardiovascular death (I20–I25, I71–I72, and I60–I69). The secondary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality. The date of death was obtained from the claims database, and this information was used to determine all-cause mortality. The follow-up period began on the index date and concluded either on the date of the first occurrence of the primary outcome or on the last follow-up date (12/31/2015).

Measurement (assessment of lifestyle changes)

Regarding lifestyle factors, we considered body mass index (BMI), current smoking status, alcohol intake categorized by weekly frequency (never; 2–3 times a month; 1–2 times a week; 3–4 times a week; ≥5 times a week), and physical activity also categorized by weekly frequency (never; 1–2 times a week; 3–4 times a week; 5–6 times a week; every day). Changes in these lifestyle factors were assessed using health checkup data from the first observation period (2002–2003) to the second (2004–2005) as shown in Fig. 1C. Detailed methods for evaluating changes in lifestyle factors are available in the Supplement 1.

Study size

A sample size estimation was not performed, as all target subjects were included.

Bias

Since subjects were selected from the cohort database according to the inclusion criteria and disease criteria, selection bias was not a concern.

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics for baseline characteristics were presented as means with SDs for numerical data and as counts with percentages for categorical data. To explore the impact of disease incidence and lifestyle behaviors according to gender, we performed gender-stratified analyses. The incidence rate (per 10,000 person-years) of outcomes was estimated using a Poisson regression model. To evaluate the influence of lifestyle changes on disease incidence, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Detailed descriptions of the covariates used for adjusting the HRs, as well as the methodology for the sensitivity analysis, are available in the Supplement 1.
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set to P<0.05.

Results

Males constituted 65.2% of the prehypertension cohort (n=60,084). Additionally, women were found to consume less alcohol (32.0% vs. 80.7% for never drinking) and to exercise less frequently (46.4% vs. 65.0% for never exercising) compared to men. Among the men, 44.1% were current smokers (n=25,201), whereas only 1.7% of women smoked currently (n=577). Similarly, in the prediabetes cohort, men made up 65.4% of the subjects (n=37,836). The percentage of women who neither exercised (47.2% vs. 67.7%) nor consumed alcohol (29.8% vs. 80.9%) was lower compared to men. In this cohort, 41.8% of men (n=15,144) were current smokers, while only 2.2% of women (n=432) were smokers. Furthermore, the prevalence of BMI over 25.0 kg/m2 was lower in women than in men in both cohorts (32.3% vs. 28.5% in the prehypertension cohort and 38.1% vs. 36.7% in the prediabetes cohort). The general characteristics of subjects according to group are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics based on the index examination of National Health Insurance Service National Health Screening

Prehypertension group Prediabetes group
All Men Women All Men Women
Participants (%) 95,152 60,084 (63.15) 35,068 (36.85) 57,865 37,836 (65.39) 20,029 (34.61)
Age (SD) 49.71 (8.08) 49.04 (7.85) 50.85 (8.34) 51.69 (8.90) 50.77 (8.57) 53.42 (9.25)
Income (%) Quintile 1 13,925 (14.63) 6,069 (10.1) 7,856 (22.4) 8,907 (15.39) 4,382 (11.58) 4,525 (22.59)
Quintile 2 11,874 (12.48) 5,966 (9.93) 5,908 (16.85) 7,975 (13.78) 4,426 (11.7) 3,549 (17.72)
Quintile 3 14,207 (14.93) 9,117 (15.17) 5,090 (14.51) 9,080 (15.69) 5,959 (15.75) 3,121 (15.58)
Quintile 4 19,537 (20.53) 13,603 (22.64) 5,934 (16.92) 11,881 (20.53) 8,271 (21.86) 3,610 (18.02)
Quintile 5 35,609 (37.42) 25,329 (42.16) 10,280 (29.31) 20,022 (34.6) 14,798 (39.11) 5,224 (26.08)
SBP, mmHg (SD) 123.69 (7.02) 123.78 (7.00) 123.54 (7.07) 128.60 (17.56) 129.80 (16.95) 126.35 (18.45)
DBP, mmHg (SD) 78.06 (5.39) 78.46 (5.14) 77.38 (5.73) 80.86 (11.50) 82.19 (11.25) 78.34 (11.55)
FBS, mg/dL (SD) 95.26 (28.80) 96.56 (30.14) 93.04 (26.20) 107.87 (6.48) 108.11 (6.54) 107.40 (6.34)
Currently smoking (%) 25,778 (28.33) 25,201 (44.05) 577 (1.71) 15,576 (28.07) 15,144 (41.79) 432 (2.24)
Drinking (%) Never 49,153 (53.27) 26,985 (46.39) 22,168 (65.01) 26,936 (47.36) 11,135 (29.82) 15,801 (80.92)
2–3 times per month 25,803 (27.96) 19,491 (33.5) 6,312 (18.51) 9,670 (17.00) 7,485 (20.04) 2,185 (11.19)
1–2 times per week 9,532 (10.33) 6,835 (11.75) 2,697 (7.91) 12,024 (21.14) 10,899 (29.19) 1,125 (5.76)
3–4 times per week 2,550 (2.76) 1,661 (2.86) 889 (2.61) 5,313 (9.34) 5,076 (13.59) 237 (1.21)
Everyday 5,235 (5.67) 3,203 (5.51) 2,032 (5.96) 2,927 (5.15) 2,748 (7.36) 179 (0.92)
Exercise (%) Never 49,153 (53.27) 26,985 (46.39) 22,168 (65.01) 30,678 (54.28) 17,469 (47.2) 13,209 (67.7)
1–2 times per week 25,803 (27.96) 19,491 (33.50) 6,312 (18.51) 15,407 (27.26) 12,106 (32.71) 3,301 (16.92)
3–4 times per week 9,532 (10.33) 6,835 (11.75) 2,697 (7.91) 5,405 (9.56) 4,098 (11.07) 1,307 (6.7)
5–6 times per week 2,550 (2.76) 1,661 (2.86) 889 (2.61) 1,517 (2.68) 1,064 (2.88) 453 (2.32)
Everyday 5,235 (5.67) 3,203 (5.51) 2,032 (5.96) 3,512 (6.21) 2,271 (6.14) 1,241 (6.36)
BMI, kg/m2 (%) <23 38,116 (40.08) 22,739 (37.87) 15,377 (43.88) 19,699 (34.06) 12,372 (32.72) 7,327 (36.61)
23–24.9 27,574 (29.00) 17,901 (29.81) 9,673 (27.60) 16,379 (28.32) 11,041 (29.20) 5,338 (26.67)
Over 25 29,409 (30.92) 19,412 (32.33) 9,997 (28.52) 21,754 (37.62) 14,403 (38.09) 7,351 (36.73)
CCI score (SD) 0.31 (0.64) 0.27 (0.61) 0.37 (0.68) 0.32 (0.63) 0.57 (0.59) 0.41 (0.70)
Total cholesterol (SD) 199.18 (36.91) 198.46 (36.46) 200.41 (37.65) 203.92 (38.00) 202.14 (37.41) 207.30 (38.87)
Statin (%) 855 (0.9) 410 (0.68) 445 (1.71) 1,026 (1.77) 520 (1.37) 506 (2.53)
HTN (%) 11,577 (20.01) 6,715 (17.75) 4,862 (24.27)
Antihypertensive drug (%) 8,962 (15.49) 5,416 (14.31) 3,546 (17.7)
DM (%) 7,376 (7.75) 4,496 (7.48) 2,880 (8.21)
Antihyperglycemic drug (%) 2,601 (2.73) 1,708 (2.84) 893 (2.55)
Aspirin 665 (0.7) 418 (0.7) 247 (0.7) 2,506 (4.33) 1,572 (4.15) 934 (4.66)

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBS, fasting blood sugar; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Table 2 presents the incidence of diseases during follow-up in subjects with prehypertension and prediabetes, categorized by gender. In the prehypertension cohort, there were 3,979 MACE cases in men and 2,290 in women. The MACE incidence rates were similar between genders (62.6/10,000 PY for men vs. 62.1/10,000 PY for women; P=0.724). However, a significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality rates, with men showing a higher rate than women (47.1/10,000 PY vs. 24.3/10,000 PY; P<0.001). In the prediabetes cohort, 3,435 MACE cases were recorded in men and 1,904 in women. The incidence rate of MACE in women was slightly higher than in men, but this difference was not statistically significant (88.0/10,000 PY for women vs. 92.8/10,000 PY for men; P=0.063). However, there was a significant difference in all-cause mortality between men and women, with men experiencing a higher rate (66.7/10,000 PY vs. 41.4/10,000 PY; P<0.001).
Table 2.

Disease incidence rate between two biennial health screening periods

Prehypertension group Prediabetes group
Outcome Men Women P for gender difference Men Women P for gender difference
Incidence rate (per 10,000 PY), [95% CI] Incidence rate (per 10,000 PY), [95% CI] Incidence rate (per 10,000 PY), [95% CI] Incidence rate (per 10,000 PY), [95% CI]
MACE1) 62.63 [60.71–64.61] 62.05 [59.56–64.65] 0.724 87.98 [85.09–90.97] 92.78 [88.70–97.04] 0.063
Non-fatal MI 18.52 [17.50–19.60] 12.14 [11.08–13.30] <0.001 23.13 [21.69–24.67] 19.11 [17.34–21.06] 0.001
Non-fatal stroke 44.21 [42.61–45.87] 50.31 [48.07–52.64] <0.001 64.04 [61.59–66.58] 74.51 [70.88–78.32] <0.001
CVD death 3.85 [3.41–4.35] 3.20 [2.69–3.82] 0.093 7.47 [6.68–8.34] 6.55 [5.56–7.71] 0.195
All-cause death 47.13 [45.49–48.82] 24.27 [22.76–25.89] <0.001 66.73 [64.26–69.29] 41.38 [38.75–44.20] <0.001

MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

1) MACE was defined as a composite of non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and CVD death.

As previously mentioned, lifestyle factors were defined as BMI, current smoking, drinking, and physical activity. In the prehypertension and prediabetes cohorts, 26.6% and 26.1% of subjects, respectively, experienced a worsening in one or more lifestyle factors. Conversely, 34.2% and 34.8% of subjects in these cohorts improved in one or more lifestyle factors. Overall, fewer than 10% of subjects experienced a decline or improvement in two or more lifestyle factors (Supplement 2).
By controlling for lifestyle and clinical factors at the initial health screening, we evaluated the effects of lifestyle changes on major outcomes using a multivariate model (Tables 3, 4). In the prehypertension group, 7,376 patients (7.75%) had already been diagnosed with T2D, and 2,601 (2.73%) were taking anti-hyperglycemic medication. Similarly, in the prediabetes group, 11,577 patients (20.01%) had been diagnosed with HTN, and 8,962 (15.49%) were on antihypertensive medication (Table 1). To isolate the effects of medication, the multivariate analysis accounted for the impact of antihypertensive drugs, anti-hyperglycemic drugs, and aspirin. In men with prehypertension, the risk of MACE increased if their lifestyle worsened (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.23, P=0.004), particularly if they gained weight (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03–1.28, P=0.010) or started smoking (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17–1.55, P<0.001). For women with prehypertension, the risk of MACE was higher for those who started smoking (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.15–2.49, P=0.008) or reduced their physical activity (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.47, P=0.010). Conversely, in men with prehypertension, improving lifestyle factors reduced the risk of MACE (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84–0.99, P=0.025), particularly through smoking cessation (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.89, P<0.001), drinking less (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00–1.20, P=0.048), or increasing physical activity (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84–0.99, P=0.027). In men with prediabetes, those whose lifestyle factors worsened had a 23% higher risk of MACE compared to those with no lifestyle changes (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12–1.35, P<0.001). An increased risk of MACE was also observed in those who gained weight (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06–1.33, P=0.003), started smoking (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64, P<0.001), or decreased their physical activity (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09–1.35, P<0.001). Additionally, in men with prediabetes, a reduction in alcohol consumption was linked to a higher risk of MACE (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07–1.29, P=0.001). In women with prediabetes, the risk of MACE was 1.24 times higher for those who gained weight compared to those with no change in BMI levels (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06–1.45, P=0.006). As weight change can be a consequence of lifestyle changes, the association between unhealthy lifestyles, excluding BMI, and MACE was evaluated. Among pre-hypertensive men, those whose lifestyles worsened had a higher risk of MACE (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02–1.20, P=0.022). Among pre-hypertensive women, those whose lifestyles improved tended to have a lower MACE risk, although this association was not statistically significant (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81–1.01, P=0.072) (Table 3, Supplement 3). In the prediabetes group, men whose lifestyles worsened showed a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12–1.35, P<0.001), while there was no significant difference in MACE risk among comparative female subjects (Table 4, Supplement 4).
Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of total cardiovascular disease events and mortality associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prehypertension group

Outcome Parameter Change Men Women
Adjusted hazard ratio P-value Adjusted hazard ratio P-value
[95% CI] [95% CI]
MACE1) Unhealthy lifestyle Worsened 1.13 [1.04–1.23] 0.004 1.10 [0.98–1.23] 0.121
Improved 0.91 [0.84–0.99] 0.025 0.94 [0.85–1.04] 0.243
Unhealthy lifestyle (exclude BMI) Worsened 1.10 [1.02–1.20] 0.022 1.03 [0.90–1.17] 0.718
Improved 0.92 [0.85–1.00] 0.052 0.91 [0.81–1.01] 0.072
BMI Worsened 1.15 [1.03–1.28] 0.010 1.09 [0.95–1.25] 0.220
Improved 0.98 [0.88–1.09] 0.683 0.97 [0.85–1.11] 0.642
Currently smoking Worsened 1.34 [1.17–1.55] <0.001 1.69 [1.15–2.49] 0.008
Improved 0.79 [0.70–0.89] <0.001 0.76 [0.48–1.21] 0.247
Frequency of drinking Worsened 1.08 [1.00–1.18] 0.061 0.92 [0.78–1.08] 0.307
Improved 1.09 [1.00–1.20] 0.048 1.10 [0.88–1.38] 0.413
Frequency of physical activity Worsened 1.09 [0.99–1.21] 0.086 1.25 [1.06–1.47] 0.010
Improved 0.91 [0.84–0.99] 0.027 0.93 [0.83–1.03] 0.166

Adjusted covariates include age, income level (quantiles), current smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, CCI score, BMI, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, fasting serum glucose level at the first health screening, and usage of statin medication prior to the index date.

MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

1) MACE was defined as a composite of non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and CVD death.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of total cardiovascular disease events and mortality associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prediabetes group

Outcome Parameter Change Men Women
Adjusted hazard ratio P-value Adjusted hazard ratio P-value
[95% CI] [95% CI]
MACE1) Unhealthy lifestyle Worsened 1.23 [1.12–1.35] <0.001 1.09 [0.96–1.24] 0.199
Improved 1.05 [0.96–1.14] 0.304 0.96 [0.85–1.07] 0.425
Unhealthy lifestyle (exclude BMI) Worsened 1.23 [1.12–1.35] <0.001 0.97 [0.83–1.13] 0.671
Improved 1.08 [0.99–1.17] 0.084 0.97 [0.86–1.09] 0.64
BMI Worsened 1.19 [1.06–1.33] 0.003 1.24 [1.06–1.45] 0.006
Improved 0.93 [0.83–1.04] 0.214 0.93 [0.80–1.07] 0.315
Currently smoking Worsened 1.41 [1.22–1.64] <0.001 0.88 [0.46–1.69] 0.693
Improved 0.91 [0.80–1.03] 0.138 1.08 [0.69–1.70] 0.741
Frequency of drinking Worsened 1.08 [0.99–1.18] 0.102 0.96 [0.81–1.14] 0.65
Improved 1.17 [1.07–1.29] 0.001 1.06 [0.82–1.38] 0.659
Frequency of physical activity Worsened 1.21 [1.09–1.35] <0.001 1.05 [0.86–1.28] 0.661
Improved 0.98 [0.90–1.07] 0.632 0.99 [0.88–1.12] 0.912

Adjusted covariates include age, income level (quantiles), current smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, CCI score, BMI, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, fasting serum glucose level at the first health screening, and usage of statin medication prior to the index date. MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

1) MACE was defined as a composite of non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and CVD death.

To mitigate the risk of reverse causality, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by excluding cardiovascular events that occurred within two years following the observation of lifestyle changes. In the prehypertension male group, the risk of MACE increased among subjects who experienced a decline in lifestyle quality, gained weight, decreased their physical activity frequency, or began smoking between biennial screenings. Conversely, the risk decreased in those who improved their lifestyles or quit smoking. In the prehypertension female group, an increase in MACE risk was observed in subjects who started smoking (Fig. 2A). In the prediabetes group, the MACE risk escalated in men who worsened their lifestyle, gained weight, reduced their physical activity frequency, or started smoking between the biennial screenings. In women, the risk increased among those who gained weight (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.

Risk of cardiovascular disease events and mortality due to lifestyle changes. (A) The prehypertension group; (B) the prediabetes group. For the sensitivity analysis, events occurring 2 years after the observation of the lifestyle changes were excluded and evaluated. MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; BMI, body mass index.

emj-47-4-63-g2

Discussion

Key results

This study highlights two significant findings: First, the risk of MACE increased in men with prediabetes or prehypertension whose lifestyle factors deteriorated, and this risk escalated even with the worsening of just one parameter. Second, the impact on MACE risk varied slightly depending on lifestyle changes, with smoking being strongly linked to an increased risk of MACE in both prediabetes and prehypertension conditions, irrespective of gender.

Interpretation/comparison with previous studies

Smoking is a well-known risk factor for CVD risk. However, the precise level of risk that smoking presents to CVD in the prehypertensive population has not been clearly defined. The incidence of CVD is higher in people with a blood pressure of 120–129/80–84 mmHg and 130–139/85–89 mmHg than in normal blood pressure group in Europe and the United States [9]. Previous studies have demonstrated that smoking significantly influences the progression from prehypertension to hypertension by stiffening the arteries [10]. Furthermore, smoking increases the risk of developing hypertension in a dose-response manner over long-term follow-up [11]. This study confirmed that MACE increased as smoking habits worsened in both women and men. In prehypertensive patients, smoking not only contributes to the progression to hypertension but also independently elevates the risk of CVD. These findings underscore the importance of smoking cessation in patient education for individuals with prehypertension.
In a previous study, smoking was strongly associated with prediabetes in healthy young individuals, showing a linear risk gradient with increased cumulative smoking exposure [12]. Additionally, prior epidemiological studies have indicated that smoking may be an independent risk factor for T2D and is significantly associated with a higher risk of coronary heart disease [1316]. A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies revealed a relative risk of 1.55 (95% CI 1.46–1.64) for total mortality and 1.29 (95% CI 1.29–1.71) for cardiovascular mortality, assessing the relationship between smoking and mortality risk in diabetes patients [17]. In this study, men with prediabetes who started smoking showed an increased risk of MACE, while smoking cessation decreased CVD death.
In this study, we also analyzed changes in the risk of MACE, specifically excluding BMI to assess whether its inclusion as a factor influenced the outcomes. Males in the prehypertension and prediabetes groups who experienced a deterioration in their lifestyle had an increased risk of MACE, a trend that persisted even when BMI was excluded. However, among women in both groups, the risk of MACE did not show significant differences when unhealthy lifestyle parameters were considered, with or without BMI (Tables 3, 4). Previous research has demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between obesity and all-cause mortality and a linear association between BMI and cardiovascular events [1820]. In this context, changes in an individual's BMI category do not directly correlate with an increase or decrease in CVD risk. For instance, overweight patients with stable coronary heart disease exhibited lower mortality compared to those of normal weight, and overweight patients with acute coronary syndrome showed significantly lower in-hospital and 12-month mortality [2123]. Furthermore, BMI does not accurately reflect body composition, such as muscle mass or fat distribution. This phenomenon, known as 'reverse causality,' suggests that BMI is often considered a result influenced by other confounding factors rather than a standalone factor in previous studies [24]. In particular, the BMI values in this dataset do not indicate any intention to lose weight. Additionally, a decrease in BMI could also result in a reduction in muscle mass. Given these considerations, although the primary outcome based on lifestyle changes, excluding BMI, revealed significant differences in MACE risk among male groups, an analysis of the impact of BMI parameters on the detailed elements of MACE yielded conflicting results (Supplementals 5, 6).
Previous studies have shown that women generally have lower rates of smoking and obesity than men, while men are more likely to engage in regular and sustained physical activity [25,26]. When comparing men and women, the increase in MACE among men whose unhealthy lifestyles worsened could be linked to differences in lifestyle patterns between the genders. Indeed, data from the NHIS indicate gender-specific lifestyle patterns; men are more likely to smoke, be obese, and consume more alcohol. A previous study demonstrated that moderate to high physical activity during leisure time was associated with a lower risk of MACE [27]. Specifically, Fig. 2 illustrates that a decreased frequency of physical activity was associated with an increased risk of MACE in both the prehypertension and prediabetes male groups.

Limitations

This study may have several limitations. First, there is a potential for misclassification bias, as the diagnoses of prediabetes and prehypertension were based on the recorded history in the NHIS and single measurements of blood pressure or serum glucose levels. Second, the data on lifestyle patterns were derived from self-reported questionnaires, which may have introduced some misclassification. Third, further research is necessary to determine if similar trends are observable in multi-racial populations beyond Asians. Fourth, the study assessed changes in lifestyle by analyzing data collected at two distinct time points, specifically between the index examination and the second examination. However, it is possible that any lifestyle changes occurring after the second examination were not captured.

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort study, a worsening smoking habit was associated with an increased incidence of MACE in populations with prehypertension and men with prediabetes. This finding remained consistent after sensitivity analysis. Specifically, a decline in healthy lifestyle habits among men significantly increased the risk of MACE. Therefore, lifestyle modifications are crucial even before the diagnosis of hypertension or T2D, as they can significantly reduce cardiovascular events and mortality, particularly in men.

Authors' contributions

Project administration: Moon CM, Park J

Conceptualization: Kim Y, Song S, Moon CM, Lee HA, Park J

Methodology & data curation: Moon CM, Lee H, Park J

Funding acquisition: Lee HA, Park J

Writing – original draft: Kim Y, Song S

Writing – review & editing: Kim Y, Song S, Moon CM, Lee HA, Park J

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2022R1A2C1093352), and by an Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2022-00155966), Artificial Intelligence Convergence Innovation Human Resources Development (Ewha Womans University).

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in online repositories. The names of the repositories and accession numbers can be found below: https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials are available from: https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2024.e60.

Supplement 1. Supplemental methods

Supplement 2. Distribution pattern according to the changes in lifestyle pattern

Supplement 3. Univariate analysis of total cardiovascular disease events and mortality associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prehypertension group

Supplement 4. Univariate analysis of total cardiovascular disease events and mortality associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prediabetes group

Supplement 5. Multivariate analysis of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prehypertension group

Supplement 6. Multivariate analysis of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke associated with lifestyle changes between two biennial health screening periods in the prediabetes group

References

1. Gong Q, Zhang P, Wang J, Ma J, An Y, Chen Y, et al. Morbidity and mortality after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance: 30-year results of the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 7(6):452–461. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30093-2. PMID: 31036503.
crossref
2. Faselis C, Doumas M, Kokkinos JP, Panagiotakos D, Kheirbek R, Sheriff HM, et al. Exercise capacity and progression from prehypertension to hypertension. Hypertension. 2012; 60(2):333–338. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.196493. PMID: 22753224.
crossref
3. Lu Q, Zhang Y, Geng T, Yang K, Guo K, Min X, et al. Association of lifestyle factors and antihypertensive medication use with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among adults with hypertension in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(2):2146118. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46118. PMID: 35103793. PMCID: PMC8808332.
4. Schlesinger S, Neuenschwander M, Ballon A, Nöthlings U, Barbaresko J. Adherence to healthy lifestyles and incidence of diabetes and mortality among individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020; 74(5):481–487. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213415. PMID: 32075860.
crossref
5. Ghadieh AS, Saab B. Evidence for exercise training in the management of hypertension in adults. Can Fam Physician. 2015; 61(3):233–239.
6. Puddey IB, Beilin LJ, Vandongen R. Regular alcohol use raises blood pressure in treated hypertensive subjects: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1987; 329(8534):647–651. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90413-2. PMID: 2882082.
crossref
7. Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, et al. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(9):2102–2107. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-0560. PMID: 16936160. PMCID: PMC1762038.
8. Seong SC, Kim YY, Park SK, Khang YH, Kim HC, Park JH, et al. Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) in Korea. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(9):016640. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016640. PMID: 28947447. PMCID: PMC5623538.
9. Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Levy D. Hypertension in adults across the age spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. JAMA. 2005; 294(4):466–472. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.4.466. PMID: 16046653.
10. Kim JW, Park CG, Hong SJ, Park SM, Rha SW, Seo HS, et al. Acute and chronic effects of cigarette smoking on arterial stiffness. Blood Press. 2005; 14(2):80–85. DOI: 10.1080/08037050510008896. PMID: 16036484.
11. Thuy AB, Blizzard L, Schmidt MD, Luc PH, Granger RH, Dwyer T. The association between smoking and hypertension in a population-based sample of Vietnamese men. J Hypertens. 2010; 28(2):245–250. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833310e0. PMID: 19829145.
crossref
12. Aeschbacher S, Schoen T, Clair C, Schillinger P, Schönenberger S, Risch M, et al. Association of smoking and nicotine dependence with pre-diabetes in young and healthy adults. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014; 144(4142):w14019. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2014.14019. PMID: 25295968.
13. Foy CG, Bell RA, Farmer DF, Goff DC Jr, Wagenknecht LE. Smoking and incidence of diabetes among U.S. adults: findings from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(10):2501–2507. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2501. PMID: 16186287.
14. Will JC, Galuska DA, Ford ES, Mokdad A, Calle EE. Cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus: evidence of a positive association from a large prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30(3):540–546. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.3.540. PMID: 11416080.
crossref
15. Beziaud F, Halimi JM, Lecomte P, Tichet J. Cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2004; 30(2):161–166. DOI: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70102-7. PMID: 15223988.
crossref
16. Morrish NJ, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, Jarrett RJ, Keen H. Risk factors for macrovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: the London follow-up to the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetics. Diabetologia. 1991; 34(8):590–594. DOI: 10.1007/BF00400279. PMID: 1936663.
crossref
17. Pan A, Wang Y, Talaei M, Hu FB. Relation of smoking with total mortality and cardiovascular events among patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Circulation. 2015; 132(19):1795–1804. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017926. PMID: 26311724. PMCID: PMC4643392.
crossref
18. Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013; 309(1):71–82. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.113905. PMID: 23280227. PMCID: PMC4855514.
crossref
19. Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(8):763–778. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa055643. PMID: 16926275.
crossref
20. Kong KA, Park J, Hong S, Hong YS, Sung YA, Lee H. Associations between body mass index and mortality or cardiovascular events in a general Korean population. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):0185024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185024. PMID: 28915262. PMCID: PMC5600387.
21. Romero-Corral A, Montori VM, Somers VK, Korinek J, Thomas RJ, Allison TG, et al. Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006; 368(9536):666–678. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69251-9. PMID: 16920472.
crossref
22. Bundhun PK, Li N, Chen MH. Does an obesity paradox really exist after cardiovascular intervention?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Medicine. 2015; 94(44):1910. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001910. PMID: 26554791. PMCID: PMC4915892.
23. Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2017; 318(2):175–193. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3303. PMID: 28697259.
crossref
24. Standl E, Erbach M, Schnell O. Defending the con side: obesity paradox does not exist. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36:Supplement_2. S282–S286. DOI: 10.2337/dcS13-2040. PMID: 23882060. PMCID: PMC3920775.
25. Chang SH, Chang YY, Wu LY. Gender differences in lifestyle and risk factors of metabolic syndrome: do women have better health habits than men? J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28(11-12):2225–2234. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14824. PMID: 30786102.
crossref
26. Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9):1601–1609. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00013. PMID: 10994912.
27. Holtermann A, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG, Marott JL. The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary Copenhagen General Population Study with 104 046 adults. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(15):1499–1511. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab087. PMID: 33831954. PMCID: PMC8046503.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles