Journal List > Int J Stem Cells > v.17(3) > 1516088259

TOOLS
Wang, Zhao, Rong, Cao, Chen, Li, Zhang, and Xu: The Role of Exosomes from Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Original Article

Int J Stem Cells 2024;17(3):236-252.

Published online: 29 November 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc23092

The Role of Exosomes from Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Haoyu Wang1, Chunxia Zhao1, Qingqing Rong1, Jinghe Cao2, Hongyi Chen3, Ruolin Li1, Bin Zhang4, , Peng Xu1,

1Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

2Department of Reproduce, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

3Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

4Institute of Forensic Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

Correspondence to Peng Xu, Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, 89 Guhuai Road, Jining 272007, China, E-mail: jyfyxp@126.com Co-Correspondence to Bin Zhang, Institute of Forensic Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Jining Medical University, 89 Guhuai Road, Jining 272000, China, E-mail: zhb861109@163.com

Received 15 June 2023       Revised 7 September 2023       Accepted 18 September 2023

Copyright © 2024 by the Korean Society for Stem Cell Research

(open-access):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious nervous system disease that usually leads to the impairment of the motor, sensory, and autonomic nervous functions of the spinal cord, and it places a heavy burden on families and healthcare systems every year. Due to the complex pathophysiological mechanism of SCI and the poor ability of neurons to regenerate, the current treatment scheme has very limited effects on the recovery of spinal cord function. In addition, due to their unique advantages, exosomes can be used as carriers for cargo transport. In recent years, some studies have confirmed that treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can promote the recovery of SCI nerve function. The therapeutic effect of MSCs is mainly related to exosomes secreted by MSCs, and exosomes may have great potential in SCI therapy. In this review, we summarized the repair mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) in SCI treatment and discussed the microRNAs related to SCI treatment based on MSCs-Exos and their mechanism of action, which is helpful to further understand the role of exosomes in SCI.

Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Mesenchymal stem cells, Exosomes, miRNA, Delivery vehicles

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious neurological disease and constitutes a considerable portion of the global injury burden (1, 2). It has been reported that SCI has a high incidence worldwide; the highest incidence in the United States of America is approximately 906 per million, and the most common cause is traffic accidents (3). Injury to the spinal cord could cause damage to the motor, sensory, and autonomic functions of the spinal cord and physical, social, or psychological damage to patients (4). Moreover, it places a substantial burden on families and healthcare systems (5, 6).
At present, the main measures to improve the lives of patients with SCI mainly include surgery, drug therapy, and rehabilitation (7-10). Unfortunately, an effective treatment to completely repair SCI and improve functional recovery has not been found. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a safe and efficacious treatment that can repair SCI.
In recent years, several clinical studies have shown that stem cell therapy can improve motor function and neurological status in patients with SCI (11). In particular, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely studied type of stem cells, which have a powerful ability in proliferation, differentiation, and tissue regeneration and can be obtained from different adult tissues, such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, umbilical cord, and placenta (12, 13). However, MSCs therapy also has some side effects in the clinic, including tumorigenicity, profibrogenic potential, and heterogenicity (3, 14). Fortunately, an increasing number of studies have shown that the therapeutic effects of MSCs are mainly related to exosomes secreted by MSCs, which have several advantages, including lower immunogenicity and an improved safety profile (15, 16). Exosomes contain nucleic acids, especially RNA, mainly including mRNA and microRNA (miRNA), the latter being considered bioactive compounds related to exosome function (17). Some studies have found that miRNAs associated with many secondary injuries are differentially expressed after SCI (18). Therefore, miRNAs may be potential targets for SCI therapy (19, 20).
In this review, we briefly describe the pathological process of SCI, provide information about exosomes, and summarize the repair mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) in the treatment of SCI. Moreover, we listed the miRNAs found in exosomes and their related mechanisms, analyzed the unique advantages of exosomes as cargo carriers, and finally indicated that MSCs-Exos might become a promising new direction for SCI therapy in the future.

Mechanism of SCI

Although SCI is a complex process involving multiple factors, the related mechanism of SCI has gradually become clear with further research (21). At present, the SCI pathological process includes two aspects: primary injury and secondary injury (22). Primary SCI is mainly due to mechanical trauma resulting in fracture and displaced bone fragments, disc material, and ligaments pressing directly on the spinal cord, which will lead to damaged blood vessels, disrupted axons, and broken neural-cell membranes (22, 23). The characteristics of primary injury are local hemorrhage, edema, and ischemia (24). Secondary SCI produces multiple cascades of chemical events that cause further tissue loss and dysfunction. These events can be divided into three distinct but often continuous sequences: acute (<48 hours), subacute (48 hours∼14 days), and chronic (14 days∼6 months) (25). The acute phase is characterized by vascular injury, blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) disruption, inflammation, ionic dysregulation, free radical production, and glutamate excitotoxicity. As the disease progresses, the SCI enters a subacute phase characterized by macrophage infiltration, astrocyte proliferation, glial scar formation, and neuronal apoptosis. Finally, it enters a chronic phase characterized by Wallerian degeneration, glial scar maturation, myelomalacia, and cyst formation. All possible mechanisms are summarized in Fig. 1 (4, 22, 26-28).

Exosomes and MSCs-Exos

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bound vesicles released by all cells, which are divided into three categories depending on their origin and biogenesis: apoptotic bodies, which are produced by the fragmentation of apoptotic cells; ectosomes, which are produced by direct outgrowths from the plasma membrane; and exosomes, which are produced by inward outgrowths from endosomal compartments that subsequently fuse with the plasma membrane (29, 30). Among them, exosomes are vesicles with a diameter of about 40∼160 nm, which contain various components such as specific lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids (31). Because exosomes have the smallest average diameter, complex composition, and diverse functions, they are the most studied EV types at present (30). Recent research has found that exosomes are actively secreted by most cells and widely exist in all body fluids and tissues, playing an important role in intercellular communication (32-35).
Exosomes are generated in a process that involves double invagination of the plasma membrane and the formation of intracellular multivesicular bodies (MVBs) containing intraluminal vesicles (ILVs), which can be summarized as four steps: budding of the plasma membrane, ILV formation, MVB formation, and exosome secretion (Fig. 2) (31, 36). The formation process and mechanism of exosomes are complex, and most of them act through the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT). The ESCRT system contains four protein complexes, ESCRT-0, ESCRT-1, ESCRT-2, and ESCRT-3, together with auxiliary proteins, such as VTA⁃1, ALIX, and VPS4 (36, 37). Notably, some studies have found that some exosomes can also be produced in the absence of ESCRT, and these mechanisms involve lipids, tetraspanins, or heat shock proteins. These approaches are collectively called ESCRT-independent mechanisms (38, 39). The process of exosome secretion into the extracellular matrix is mainly through MVB transport to the plasma membrane and fusion with the plasma membrane, depending on the synergy of several Rab GTPases and SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion attachment protein receptors) complexes (31, 40, 41). Finally, the released exosomes can directly enter cells through three different mechanisms: receptor-mediated entry, direct membrane fusion, and endocytosis, as shown in Fig. 2 (40).
MSCs-Exos is one of the most studied exosomes. MSCs-Exos contain multiple proteins with multiple functions, including ESCRT complexes, ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix), tumor susceptibility gene 101 (Tsg101), Rab GTPases, integrins, heat shock protein (HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90), and MHC class I and class II proteins (42, 43). In addition, MSCs also have characteristic tetraspanins (CD81, CD9, and CD63) and some surface markers (CD44, CD73, and CD90) (Fig. 2) (31, 44). MSCs-Exos participate in intercellular communication, which can carry proteins, mRNA, and miRNA into other cells (45). They can participate in the metabolism, energy pathways, cell growth, communication, and transport of target cells and regulate a wide range of normal physiological and pathological processes (46, 47). In particular, nucleic acids are abundant in exosomes, including mRNAs, miRNAs, mitochondrial DNA and piRNAs, ncRNA, ribosomal RNA, and snRNA (48). Among these RNAs, miRNAs have been the most extensively studied. They are endogenous small noncoding RNA molecules 18∼25 nucleotides in length that can control the expression of mRNAs, protein production, and cell function at the posttranscriptional level (49, 50). Primary miRNAs are transcribed, processed, and transported to the cytoplasm and then cleaved to generate double-stranded mature miRNAs, which often interact with target messenger RNAs, resulting in translational repression and degradation of these target mRNAs (49, 51). Biologically, miRNAs have been implicated in development, differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and immune responses (52). Currently, increasing evidence shows that MSCs-Exos and their miRNAs have great potential in promoting functional recovery after SCI, which is another new hope after stem cell treatment of SCI.

Mechanism of MSCs-Exos treatment of SCI

Compared with MSCs, MSCs-Exos have the advantages of low cytotoxicity, penetrating deep tissues, being able to escape the rapid clearance of the phagocytic system, and penetrating the blood-brain barrier, so there are an increasing number of studies on exosomes for the treatment of SCI (53). At present, a large number of animal experiments and cell experiments have proven that MSCs-Exos contribute to the repair of SCI (Table 1), but there are few related clinical studies. We summarize the mechanisms related to the existing research on MSCs-Exos and their miRNAs in the treatment of SCI.

Regulation of the neuroinflammatory response

Inhibiting inflammation by exosomes: The inflammatory response induced by SCI is an important factor in secondary injury. Microglia, neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes accumulate and release various cytokines in the microenvironment due to the disruption of capillaries, the BSCB, and chemokines, which unbalance the local microenvironment (54, 55). The microenvironment contains multiple proinflammatory factors (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-13) that are related to the functional recovery of SCI patients (56). Therefore, modulating local microenviron-mental inflammation may be a therapeutic approach for SCI (10, 56).
Several studies have demonstrated that exosomes can modulate the levels of inflammatory factors (Fig. 3). Fan et al. (57) showed that bone marrow stem cell-derived exosomes (BMSC-Exos) can attenuate the inflammatory response and apoptosis of SCI by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. Zhang et al. (58) found that miR-181c-enriched BMSC-Exos could downregulate the levels of TNF-α and IL-1β to reduce spinal cord inflammation and apoptosis, and the study illustrated that the mechanism may be the inhibition of Phosphatase and Tensin homolog (PTEN) and NF-κB signaling. Nie and Jiang (59) also made a similar discovery that miR-23b delivered by BMSC-Exos could decrease the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α) and increase the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10). miR-23b also promotes the transformation of microglia to the M2 type. Further studies revealed that it attenuates the inflammatory cytokine response by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Recently, Sung et al. (60) demonstrated that exosomes from human epidural adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) attenuated local inflammatory responses by inhibiting the release of proinflammatory cytokines after SCI.
In addition, neuroinflammation, which is characterized by the activation of central immune cells triggered by various causes, also plays a key role in the secondary injury process of SCI, and the most important step is the activation of various inflammasome complexes (61, 62). Inflammasome complexes consist of three components: a sensor, adaptor protein apoptotic speck protein, and effector caspase-1 (63). Currently, the sensors that have been identified include NLR family pyrin domain containing (NLRP)1, NLRP3, and NOD like receptor family CARD domain containing 4, and absent in melanoma 2 (64, 65). Studies have found that the expression of the above four inflammasomes is upregulated after SCI injury (64, 65), and inhibition of inflammasome activation reduces neuronal death and promotes motor recovery (66-68). Recently, several studies have shown that exosomes can inhibit the activation of inflammasomes to attenuate inflammatory responses (69). Huang et al. (70) suggested epidural fat mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (EF-MSCs-Exos) via tail vein injection to improve neurological functional recovery, and the possible mechanism is to inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation and reduce the expression of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, Noori et al. (71) indicated that human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (HWJ-MSCs-Exos) attenuated neuroinflammation after SCI by decreasing the expression of caspase 1, a component of the inflammasome complex, and the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-18, and TNF-α. Thus, MSCs-Exos and their miRNA can modulate the levels of inflammatory factors to improve the outcome of SCI.
Promotion of macrophage polarization by exosomes: Microglia are resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS) and are mainly derived from microglial progenitor cells derived from the embryonic yolk sac (72, 73). Macrophages are derived from blood mononuclear cells, which are derived from myeloid progeny in the bone marrow (74). After SCI, the destruction of the cerebrospinal barrier allows monocytes to infiltrate the spinal cord tissue and transform into macrophages, which together with resident microglia activate and participate in inflammatory responses (75). Notably, macrophages and microglia were morphologically and immunohistologically indistinguishable after activation (76). Thus, activated microglia and blood-derived monocytes are collectively referred to as CNS macrophages (77). Macrophages have two main polarization phenotypes: M1 and M2 (74, 78). M1 macrophages (proinflammatory cells) produce various pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-23, IL-1β, and TNF-α), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide to promote inflammation and neuronal damage. In contrast, M2 macrophages (anti-inflammatory cells) have anti-inflammatory and tissue repair properties because they express high levels of the anti-inflammatory factors IL-10 or transforming growth factor (TGF)β, and some studies have confirmed that the predominance of M1 macrophages compared with M2 macrophages can aggravate injury after SCI (54, 76, 79). Therefore, the regulation of macrophage polarization may be a treatment method for SCI.
Some studies have reported that MSCs-Exos can promote macrophage polarization (Fig. 3). Chang et al. (80) found that miR-125a from BMSC-Exos could promote M2 macrophage polarization by negatively regulating interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) expression and ultimately reduce the inflammatory response caused by SCI and promote the recovery of motor function. Li et al. (81) showed that exosomal miR-124-3p from BMSC attenuated nerve injury induced by SCI, which may inhibit endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus signaling 1 (Ern1) and promote M2 pola-rization. Liu et al. (82) suggested that exosomal miR-216a-5p from hypoxia-treated MSCs inhibited TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and activated the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to convert microglia from the M1 proinflammatory phenotype to the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype and increase the treatment potential of SCI. In addition, Liu et al. (83) revealed that dental pulp stem cell-derived exosomes could suppress M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the ROS-MAPK-NF-κB P65 signaling pathway after SCI. Thus, MSCs-Exos and their miRNA can promote macrophage polarization to improve the outcome of SCI.
Regulation of astrocytes by exosomes: Astrocytes are involved in CNS repair and play a very important role in the process of SCI (84-87). There are two types of reactive astrocytes, A1 and A2 astrocytes, which are induced by neuroinflammation (induced by IL-1α, TNF-α, and C1q) and ischemia. A1 astrocytes have neurotoxic effects on myelin sheaths, synapses, and neurons; in contrast, A2 astrocytes exert neuroprotective effects by upregulating the expression of certain neurotrophic factors (86, 87). There-fore, reducing the proportion of A1 neurotoxic astrocytes may be a potential treatment strategy for SCI.
There are few reports that MSCs-Exos reduce A1 neurotoxic astrocytes (Fig. 3). Wang et al. (88) found that intravenous administration of MSCs-Exos exerts anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in a rat model of SCI, possibly by inhibiting nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 to reduce SCI-induced A1 astrocytes. Liu et al. (89) identified that BMSC-Exos can inhibit the activation of A1 neurotoxicity-responsive astrocytes and promote functional behavioral recovery after acute SCI. Lai et al. (90) showed that exosomal miR-146a-5p from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUC-MSCs) significantly reduces the toxic effects of neurotoxic astrocytes and promotes the recovery of neurological function in injured rats, and its possible mechanism is to inhibit the activation of the NF-κB pathway by suppressing the expression of TNF receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 1 (IRAK1). Thus, MSCs-Exos and their miRNA can reduce A1 neurotoxic astrocytes to improve the outcome of SCI.

Promotion of angiogenesis by exosomes

Blood vessels can transport multiple ingredients (oxygen and nutrients), remove metabolic waste, and facilitate cell circulation (91, 92). After SCI, vascular injury leads to ischemia, hemorrhage, and immune cell infiltration, accelerating the onset of secondary injury and neurological deficits (93, 94). Studies have proven that angiogenesis is one of the most important conditions for ensuring tissue survival and functional regeneration (95). Therefore, promoting angiogenesis is another research direction for SCI.
Several studies have shown that exosomes can promote angiogenesis after SCI (Fig. 4). Zhang et al. (96) found that human placenta mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (HP-MSCs-Exos) could promote tube formation by endothelial cells in vitro and new vessel formation in vivo and improve neurologic function in mice post-SCI. Xue et al. (97) revealed that MSCs-Exos induced by hypoxia have been found to accelerate angiogenesis by promoting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression through activation of the PKA signaling pathway. Recent research also revealed that hypoxia-stimulated exosomes derived from MSCs could be transplanted into the injured spinal cord through an adhesive hydrogel, which could promote angiogenesis and functional recovery after injury in vitro and in vivo (98). Furthermore, besides exosomes from MSCs, exosomes derived from neural stem cells (99), M2 macrophages (100), microglia (101), and Schwann cells (102) have also been found to promote angiogenesis to facilitate functional recovery after SCI. However, the mechanism by which exosomes promote angiogenesis still needs further research. Thus, MSCs-Exos can promote angiogenesis to improve the outcome of SCI.

Activation of autophagy and inhibition of apoptosis by exosomes

Autophagy is an important defense and protection mechanism for an organism. Autophagy mainly participates in cell recycling by degrading damaged and denatured proteins, organelles, and other substances, thus enabling neurons to survive in an environment deficient in nutritional factors (103-105). Proper activation of autophagy is beneficial to eliminate toxic proteins and damaged mitochondria for promoting neuroprotection in traumatic SCI (106). Previous studies have found that the levels of autophagy biomarkers (Beclin-1, LC3B II, and P63) are elevated during the acute phase of secondary injury in SCI, indicating that autophagy was significantly activated (107, 108). In addition, apoptosis, also known as programmed cell death, plays a crucial role in SCI-induced cell death (109, 110). Inhibition of apoptosis signaling pathways could impede neuronal cell death (111). Some studies have shown that activation of autophagy and inhibition of neuronal apoptosis can promote the recovery of neural function after SCI (112, 113). Therefore, modulation of autophagy and apoptosis is a promising therapeutic strategy for SCI.
Recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy and apoptosis are closely related to exosomes (Fig. 5). BMSC-Exos can inhibit neuronal apoptosis by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (114). EF-MSCs-Exos could decrease the expression level of the proapoptotic protein Bax and upregulate antiapoptotic proteins to reduce apoptosis after SCI (70). HUC-MSCs-Exos improved rat motor function after SCI through anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammatory effects, possibly by regulating the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)/Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) axis and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways (115). Another study found that BMSC-Exos not only enhanced the expression of the autophagy-related proteins LC3IIB and Beclin-1 and induced autophagosomes to form but also reduced the expression level of the proapoptotic protein cleaved caspase-3 and upregulated the expression level of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. These effects ultimately attenuate neuronal apoptosis by promoting autophagy and functional behavior recovery in SCI rats (116).
In addition, some miRNAs from exosomes have similar findings. Xu et al. (117) found that miR-21 and miR-19b derived from MSCs-Exos could reduce the expression of PTEN in a rat model of SCI, and further studies confirmed that they could regulate the apoptosis and differentiation of neuronal cells by regulating PTEN expression. Kang et al. (118) similarly found that miR-21 derived from MSCs-Exos inhibited the apoptosis of neurons in SCI rats by regulating programmed cell death 4 protein (PDCD4) and PTEN expression. Zhou et al. (119) suggested that miR-21-5p was one of the most highly expre-ssed miRNAs in MSCs-Exos, which could downregulate the expression of the proapoptotic target gene FasL and attenuate apoptosis in the injured spinal cord. Xiao et al. (120) reported that the expression of miR-29b-3p was upregulated in the spinal cord tissue of SCI rats treated with MSCs-Exos. Treatment of SCI rats with MSCs-Exos transfected with miR-29b-3p inhibitor significantly increased apoptosis in the spinal cord tissue. Further research found that its possible mechanism is to activate the Akt/mTOR pathway through the miR-29b-3p/PTEN axis to promote neurological function recovery in rats. Jia et al. (121) showed that miR-381 derived from MSCs-Exos reverses neuronal apoptosis by downregulating the BRD4/WnT5A axis and can promote recovery from SCI in a rat model. A recent study found that miR-499-5p derived from hypoxia-induced adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (AD-MSCs-Exos) may promote SCI repair by inhi-biting JNK3/MAPK10 and negatively regulating the JNK3/c-jun signaling pathway to regulate neuronal apoptosis (122). Furthermore, He et al. (123) explored exosomal miR-9-5p on SCI progression in an in vitro or in vivo model and discovered that exosomal miR-9-5p derived from BMSC inhibited the expression of histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5), deacetylated the FGF2 gene and decreased its expression, thereby inhibiting FGF2-mediated apoptosis, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress to alleviate SCI in rats. Similarly, Huang et al. (124) revealed through in vitro and in vivo experiments that miR-511-3p from hypoxia-induced AD-MSCs-Exos can inhibit neuronal apoptosis and inflammatory reactions by regulating the TRAF6/S1P axis and weakening SCI progression. Thus, MSCs-Exos and their miRNA can regulate autophagy and apoptosis to improve the outcome of SCI.

Regulation of BSCB permeability by exosomes

The BSCB is the most important interface for the exchange of molecules between the blood and spinal cord parenchyma; it is mainly responsible for maintaining the normal function of the nervous system and is regulated by neurovascular unit cells (125). The BSCB is composed of the basement membrane, pericytes, capillary endothelial cells, and astrocyte foot processes (126). In particular, pericytes, as a part of the neurovascular unit, are very important for maintaining the integrity and function of blood vessels and the BSCB (127). Current studies have shown that pericytes can maintain the stability of microvessels, possibly through the following three mechanisms: promoting the expression of endothelial tight junction proteins, regulating vesicle transport and body flow across cells, and moderating the tightness connection arrangement (128). Following SCI, the structural disruption and increased permeability of the BSCB can lead to secondary injuries such as spinal cord edema, hemorrhage, oxidative stress, and excessive inflammation (127). Therefore, maintaining the integrity of the BSCB after SCI may be a potential therapeutic approach.
Some studies have identified that exosomes can improve BSCB integrity (Fig. 4). Lu et al. (129) provided the first evidence that BMSC-Exos could inhibit pericyte migration via suppression of the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby maintaining the integrity of the BSCB and promoting functional recovery after SCI. Zhou et al. (130) showed that BMSC-Exos effectively suppresses pericyte pyroptosis and maintain BSCB integrity. Recently, another study found that MSCs-Exos increases the expression of cell junction proteins via the TIMP2/MMP pathway, which ultimately attenuates the destruction of the BSCB and improves functional recovery after SCI (131). In addition, Nakazaki et al. (132) suggested that MSCs-Exos were able to target M2 macrophages to upregulate TGFβ, TGFβ receptors, and tight junction proteins, thereby reducing BSCB permeability. Thus, MSCs-Exos can improve BSCB integrity to improve the outcome of SCI.

Promotion of neuronal regeneration and axonal growth by exosomes

Axonal damage and neuronal apoptosis usually occur during the secondary injury period of SCI (10). Due to the weak ability of neurons and axons to regenerate, they are almost unable to regenerate after injury, which ultimately leads to a large degree of limited functional recovery of the spinal cord (133). Therefore, promoting axonal growth and neuronal regeneration is one of the directions of SCI treatment.
Some studies have verified that exosomes can promote axonal growth and neuronal regeneration (Fig. 6). Early researchers found that MSCs-Exos could promote the growth of axons in neurons, but the mechanism was unclear (134, 135). Recently. Zhou et al. (136) reported that HP-MSCs-Exos can promote motor function recovery after SCI through endogenous neural progenitor cell activation and neurogenesis, a process that may involve activation of the MEK/ERK/CREB signaling pathway. Li et al. (137) provided that Exosomes derived from lipopolysaccharide-precondi-tioned MSCs can promote M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the NF-κb/NLRP3 signaling pathway, which ultimately promotes axon regeneration and myelin regene-ration. Wang et al. (138) found that miR-199a-3p/145-5p derived from HUC-MSCs-Exos target Cblb and Cbl mRNAs, inhibit the ubiquitination-mediated degradation of TrkA, and ultimately mediate the NGF/TrkA signaling pathway to promote neurite outgrowth and functional recovery in rats. Han et al. (139) revealed that MSCs-Exos upregulate receptor-regulated Smad 6 expression and promote neuronal regeneration in SCI rats by carrying TGFβ. Wang et al. (140) showed that MSCs-Exos containing miR-let-7a-5p can downregulate SMAD2 expression by inhibiting high-mobility Group A2 (HMGA2) and ultimately promote neuronal regeneration and improve neurological recovery through the HMGA2/SMAD2 axis in SCI rats. Thus, MSCs-Exos and their miRNA can promote axonal growth and neuronal regene-ration to improve the outcome of SCI.

Exosomes as delivery vehicles for the transport of cargo

Recent studies have shown that exosomes not only have innate therapeutic potential but also serve as drug-delivery vehicles (141). The commonly used drug delivery carriers are multifunctional nanomaterials, including polymer nanoparticles, micelles, liposomes, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, microneedles, and polymer vesicles. Not only are nanomaterials potentially systemically toxic and immunogenic, but there are still barriers to accurate delivery to in vivo target sites (142). Compared with other carriers, exosomes have the following advantages: low cytotoxicity, deep tissue penetration, rapid clearance from the phagocytic system, and penetration of the blood-brain barrier (53). Various methods (electroporation, sonication, coincubation with modified cargo) have been developed to load proteins, siRNA, miRNA, and small molecule compounds into exosomes, which are subsequently delivered to the animal via intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, and topical injections to produce therapeutic effects (143). Studies have found that exosomes carrying miRNAs can repair SCI; thus, exosomes can be used as cargo transporters, which is another new method of SCI treatment.
At present, some experiments have proven that exosomes carrying miRNA have great potential in the treatment of SCI. Li et al. (144) discovered that miR-544-modified MSCs-Exos improve functional recovery and neuronal survival by reducing the levels of proinflammatory cytokines after SCI. Li et al. (145) identified that loaded with miR-133b, MSCs-Exos preserved neuronal cells and enhanced the regeneration of axons, which was attributed to the activation of ERK1/2, STAT3, and CREB, as well as to the inhibition of RhoA expression. MSCs-Exos containing miR-126 not only inhibits the expression of SCI-related EVH1 domain protein 1 and phosphoinositide 3 kinase regulatory subunit 2 to promote angiogenesis after SCI but also has apoptotic effects (146). Ren et al. (147) discovered that miR-133b-modified AD-MSCs-Exos can affect the signaling pathway related to axon regeneration, NF, GAP43, GFAP, and MBP and promote the recovery of neurological function in SCI animals. Similarly, miRNA-29b loaded in BMSC-Exos repaired SCI in rats by regulating proteins involved in neuronal regeneration, such as NF200, GAP-43, and GFAP (148). Overexpression of miR-338-5p in BMSC-Exos provided neuroprotection and inhibited apoptosis after SCI in vivo and in vitro. Further studies indicated that the possible mechanism is the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway through cAMP-mediated Rap1 activation (149). Chen et al. (150) and Liu et al. (151) found that loaded with miR-455-5p, BMSC-Exos could alleviate SCI, increase autophagy to inhibit neuronal apoptosis and promote recovery of locomotor function after SCI by downregulating Nogo-A. Chen et al. (152) verified that loaded with miR-26a, BMSC-Exos could activate the PTEN-AKT-mTOR pathway to promote axonal regeneration and neurogenesis and attenuate glial scarring in SCI. Sheng et al. (153) reported that MSCs-Exos loaded with miRNA-22 can inhibit the pyroptosis of microglia and the neuroinflammatory response after SCI and ultimately improve the neurological function of rats. Huang et al. (154) showed that MSCs-Exos loaded with miR-494 can suppress inflammatory responses and resist apoptosis by promoting the polarity of macrophages and increasing the levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Last, Jiang and Zhang (155) suggested that MSCs-Exos loaded with miR-145-5p reduces inflammation in SCI by regulating the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. The above large number of animal experiments has confirmed the great potential of exosome-carrying miRNAs in the treatment of SCI. Thus, MSCs-Exos can carry external miRNA to improve the outcome of SCI.

Discussion

Acute SCI is a severe CNS injury that has high morbidity and mortality. Due to the complex structure of the CNS and the poor regeneration ability of neurons, the treatment of SCI is still a worldwide problem. Previous studies have shown that MSCs may be a new research direction for the treatment of SCI, and a large number of animal studies have shown that stem cells can promote SCI repair through tissue repair and replacement, angiogenesis, and neurotrophic, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, but MSCs treatment also has many safety problems, such as thrombosis and embolism, infection, immune rejection, and tumorigenicity (11). As research progressed, it was found that the efficacy of MSCs appeared to be related to the exosomes they secreted. Exosomes have the advantages of small size, good biocompatibility, low toxicity, and low immunogenicity, which suggests that exosome therapy is superior to stem cell therapy (156). More importantly, exosomes can transport genetic material, protect it from extra-cellular degradation, penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and act on receptor cells with high selectivity, making them an ideal delivery system for regenerative medicine (157). In recent years, MSCs-Exos have achieved satisfactory results in clinical studies in the treatment of ischemic stroke, macular degeneration, diabetes, and kidney disease (43). Although there are currently no clinical studies on exosomes and SCI, a large number of animal studies in this review demonstrate that exosomes have neuroprotective properties as a treatment for SCI, paving the way for future clinical studies on exosomes. In addition, after SCI, miRNAs related to oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and other secondary injuries are significantly differentially expressed, resulting in differential expression of target genes and changes in cell function, which makes us pay more attention to the role of miRNAs in SCI. The possible therapeutic mechanisms and effects of some miRNAs in SCI have been discovered thus far, but the direct mechanisms of more miRNAs are still unclear, so further exploration is needed, and miRNAs are expected to become a key component of SCI repair. Moreover, MSCs-Exos are promising cell-free drug delivery systems for delivering therapeutic agents, such as miRNAs, to target tissues in animal models, enabling individualized therapy through proteins in miRNA-regulated pathways.
Despite the progress of exosomes in the treatment of SCI, there are still many challenges to be faced. On the one hand, the separation, purification, and amplification of exosomes need to be solved comprehensively. There is an urgent need for rapid, inexpensive, simple, and standardized isolation and purification procedures to produce high-purity, high-yield exosomes with intact biological acti-vity. On the other hand, current SCI models are mainly rats or mice. Due to species and anatomical differences, the human nervous system is more complex than rodents, and recovery after SCI is more difficult. Therefore, it is important to clarify the experimental efficacy of exosomes in primates, which have a more complex and advanced nervous system, to provide a further theoretical basis for the next clinical study. In addition, exosomes are generally not targeted, and it remains challenging to efficiently translocate them to the site of the lesion and to function in vivo for a long period. Recent studies have identified tissue-engineered scaffolds and bioengineering approaches to assist exosome delivery, which not only improve exosome targeting but also facilitate long-term sustainment and slow release of exosomes in vivo (158). Therefore, further search for efficient tissue engineering and bioengineering techniques can help exosomes to function better.

Summary

In conclusion, MSCs-Exos and their miRNAs, as new therapeutic methods for SCI, showed special advantages. Current animal research has clarified that MSCs-Exos and their miRNAs in the treatment of SCI, including regulating immune responses, promoting angiogenesis, activating autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis, regulating the permeability of BSCB, promoting neuronal regeneration and axonal growth, and acting as delivery carriers. However, there are still many challenges, including exploring more efficient methods for isolation, purification, and amplification of exosomes, clarifying the role of exosomes in different animal models of SCI, and finding efficient tissue engi-neering and bioengineering techniques to improve the efficacy of exosomes. Ultimately, we believe that MSCs-Exos offers new possibilities for the treatment of SCI, and we expect that relevant clinical trials will be able to be conducted in the future, ultimately benefiting all of humanity.

Notes

Potential Conflict of Interest

There is no potential conflict of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contribution

Conceptualization: BZ, PX. Funding acquisition: BZ, PX. Writing – original draft: HW, CZ, QR. Writing – review and editing: JC, HC, RL, PX, BZ.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82173371), project tsqn201909192 supported by Tai Shan Young Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province, project ZR2020YQ59 supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, Shandong Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science () and Technology Development Program and Jining City Key R&D Program (2021YXNS103). The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

References

1. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. 2019; Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18:56–87. Erratum in: Lancet Neurol 2021;20:e7. DOI: 10.3410/f.734500777.793573250. PMID: 30497965. PMCID: PMC6291456.
2. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18:459–480. DOI: 10.3410/f.735346535.793561284. PMID: 30879893. PMCID: PMC6459001.
3. Singh A, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. 2014; Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin Epidemiol. 6:309–331. DOI: 10.2147/clep.s68889. PMID: 25278785. PMCID: PMC4179833.
4. Eli I, Lerner DP, Ghogawala Z. 2021; Acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurol Clin. 39:471–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.02.004. PMID: 33896529.
5. Feigin VL, Vos T, Alahdab F, et al. 2021; Burden of neurological disorders across the US from 1990-2017: a global burden of disease study. JAMA Neurol. 78:165–176. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4152. PMID: 33136137. PMCID: PMC7607495.
6. Islam MS, Harvey LA, Hossain MS, et al. 2021; The cost of providing a community-based model of care to people with spinal cord injury, and the healthcare costs and economic burden to households of spinal cord injury in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord. 59:833–841. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00600-6. PMID: 33495581.
7. Bracken MB. 2012; Steroids for acute spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:CD001046. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001046.pub2. PMID: 22258943. PMCID: PMC6513405.
8. Rath N, Balain B. 2017; Spinal cord injury-the role of surgical treatment for neurological improvement. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 8:99–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.06.016. PMID: 28720984. PMCID: PMC5498753.
9. Wutte C, Klein B, Becker J, et al. 2019; Earlier decompression (< 8 hours) results in better neurological and functional outcome after traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 36:2020–2027. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6146. PMID: 30489193.
10. Zhang Y, Al Mamun A, Yuan Y, et al. 2021; Acute spinal cord injury: pathophysiology and pharmacological intervention (Re-view). Mol Med Rep. 23:417. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12056. PMID: 33846780. PMCID: PMC8025476.
11. Silvestro S, Bramanti P, Trubiani O, Mazzon E. 2020; Stem cells therapy for spinal cord injury: an overview of clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci. 21:659. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21020659. PMID: 31963888. PMCID: PMC7013533.
12. Berebichez-Fridman R, Montero-Olvera PR. 2018; Sources and clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells: state-of-the-art review. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 18:e264–e277. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.03.002. PMID: 30607265. PMCID: PMC6307657.
13. Brown C, McKee C, Bakshi S, et al. 2019; Mesenchymal stem cells: cell therapy and regeneration potential. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 13:1738–1755. DOI: 10.1002/term.2914. PMID: 31216380.
14. Musiał-Wysocka A, Kot M, Majka M. 2019; The pros and cons of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies. Cell Transplant. 28:801–812. DOI: 10.1177/0963689719837897. PMID: 31018669. PMCID: PMC6719501.
15. Qiu G, Zheng G, Ge M, et al. 2019; Functional proteins of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell Res Ther. 10:359. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1484-6. PMID: 31779700. PMCID: PMC6883709.
16. Romanelli P, Bieler L, Scharler C, et al. 2019; Extracellular vesicles can deliver anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring activities of mesenchymal stromal cells after spinal cord injury. Front Neurol. 10:1225. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01225. PMID: 31849808. PMCID: PMC6896947.
17. Qiu G, Zheng G, Ge M, et al. 2018; Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles affect disease outcomes via tra-nsfer of microRNAs. Stem Cell Res Ther. 9:320. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-1069-9. PMID: 30463593. PMCID: PMC6249826.
18. Guo XD, He XG, Yang FG, et al. 2021; Research progress on the regulatory role of microRNAs in spinal cord injury. Regen Med. 16:465–476. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0125. PMID: 33955796.
19. Quinzaños-Fresnedo J, Sahagún-Olmos RC. 2015; Micro RNA and its role in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury - a further step towards neuroregenerative medicine. Cir Cir. 83:442–447. Spanish. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0125. PMID: 26162489.
20. Yuan J, Botchway BOA, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liu X. 2020; Role of circular ribonucleic acids in the treatment of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 57:4296–4304. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-02027-9. PMID: 32700251.
21. Lima R, Monteiro A, Salgado AJ, Monteiro S, Silva NA. 2022; Pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches for spinal cord injury. Int J Mol Sci. 23:13833. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213833. PMID: 36430308. PMCID: PMC9698625.
22. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. 2002; Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 359:417–425. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07603-1. PMID: 11844532.
23. Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. 2001; Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26(24 Suppl):S2–S12. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002. PMID: 11805601.
24. Young W. 1993; Secondary injury mechanisms in acute spinal cord injury. J Emerg Med. 11 Suppl 1:13–22. PMID: 8445198.
25. Rowland JW, Hawryluk GW, Kwon B, Fehlings MG. 2008; Cur-rent status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus. 25:E2. DOI: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E2. PMID: 18980476.
26. Tran AP, Warren PM, Silver J. 2018; The biology of regeneration failure and success after spinal cord injury. Physiol Rev. 98:881–917. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2017. PMID: 29513146. PMCID: PMC5966716.
27. Alizadeh A, Dyck SM, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S. 2019; Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front Neurol. 10:282. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00282. PMID: 30967837. PMCID: PMC6439316.
28. Venkatesh K, Ghosh SK, Mullick M, Manivasagam G, Sen D. 2019; Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, treatment strategies, associated challenges, and future implications. Cell Tissue Res. 377:125–151. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-019-03039-1. PMID: 31065801.
29. Cocucci E, Meldolesi J. 2015; Ectosomes and exosomes: shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. Trends Cell Biol. 25:364–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.01.004. PMID: 25683921.
30. Jeppesen DK, Zhang Q, Franklin JL, Coffey RJ. 2023; Extrace-llular vesicles and nanoparticles: emerging complexities. Trends Cell Biol. 33:667–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.01.002. PMID: 36737375. PMCID: PMC10363204.
31. Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. 2020; The biology, function, and biomedi-cal applications of exosomes. Science. 367:eaau6977. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau6977,. PMID: 32029601. PMCID: PMC7717626.
32. Caby MP, Lankar D, Vincendeau-Scherrer C, Raposo G, Bonnerot C. 2005; Exosomal-like vesicles are present in human blood plasma. Int Immunol. 17:879–887. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxh267. PMID: 15908444.
33. Pisitkun T, Shen RF, Knepper MA. 2004; Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:13368–13373.
34. Keller S, Ridinger J, Rupp AK, Janssen JW, Altevogt P. 2011; Body fluid derived exosomes as a novel template for clinical diagnostics. J Transl Med. 9:86. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-86. PMID: 21651777. PMCID: PMC3118335.
35. Zhang Y, Yu M, Tian W. 2016; Physiological and pathological impact of exosomes of adipose tissue. Cell Prolif. 49:3–13. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12233. PMID: 26776755. PMCID: PMC6496788.
36. Kowal J, Tkach M, Théry C. 2014; Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 29:116–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.004. PMID: 24959705.
37. Colombo M, Moita C, van Niel G, et al. 2013; Analysis of ESCRT functions in exosome biogenesis, composition and secretion highlights the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles. J Cell Sci. 126(Pt 24):5553–5565. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.128868. PMID: 24105262.
38. Stuffers S, Sem Wegner C, Stenmark H, Brech A. 2009; Multive-sicular endosome biogenesis in the absence of ESCRTs. Traffic. 10:925–937. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00920.x. PMID: 19490536.
39. van Niel G, Charrin S, Simoes S, et al. 2011; The tetraspanin CD63 regulates ESCRT-independent and -dependent endosomal sorting during melanogenesis. Dev Cell. 21:708–721. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.019. PMID: 21962903. PMCID: PMC3199340.
40. Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, Théry C. 2019; Specifi-cities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extra-cellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol. 21:9–17. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9. PMID: 30602770.
41. Xunian Z, Kalluri R. 2020; Biology and therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Cancer Sci. 111:3100–3110. DOI: 10.1111/cas.14563. PMID: 32639675. PMCID: PMC7469857.
42. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H, Tang WH. 2019; Exosomes: biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci. 9:19. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-019-0282-2. PMID: 30815248. PMCID: PMC6377728.
43. Mendt M, Rezvani K, Shpall E. 2019; Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for clinical use. Bone Marrow Transplant. 54(Suppl 2):789–792. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0616-z. PMID: 31431712.
44. L Ramos T, Sánchez-Abarca LI, Muntión S, et al. 2016; MSC surface markers (CD44, CD73, and CD90) can identify human MSC-derived extracellular vesicles by conventional flow cyto-metry. Cell Commun Signal. 14:2. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-015-0124-8. PMID: 26754424. PMCID: PMC4709865.
45. Heldring N, Mäger I, Wood MJ, Le Blanc K, Andaloussi SE. 2015; Therapeutic potential of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and their extracellular vesicles. Hum Gene Ther. 26:506–517. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2015.072. PMID: 26153722.
46. Yang C, Guo WB, Zhang WS, et al. 2017; Comprehensive proteomics analysis of exosomes derived from human seminal plasma. Andrology. 5:1007–1015. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12412. PMID: 28914500. PMCID: PMC5639412.
47. Kim HS, Choi DY, Yun SJ, et al. 2012; Proteomic analysis of microvesicles derived from human mesenchymal stem cells. J Proteome Res. 11:839–849. DOI: 10.1021/pr200682z. PMID: 22148876.
48. Liang Y, Duan L, Lu J, Xia J. 2021; Engineering exosomes for targeted drug delivery. Theranostics. 11:3183–3195. DOI: 10.7150/thno.52570. PMID: 33537081. PMCID: PMC7847680.
49. Bartel DP. 2004; MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 116:281–297. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. PMID: 14744438.
50. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. 2008; Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 9:102–114. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2290. PMID: 18197166.
51. Winter J, Jung S, Keller S, Gregory RI, Diederichs S. 2009; Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol. 11:228–234. DOI: 10.1038/ncb0309-228. PMID: 19255566.
52. Tüfekci KU, Meuwissen RL, Genç S. 2014; The role of microRNAs in biological processes. Methods Mol Biol. 1107:15–31. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_2. PMID: 24272429.
53. Wiklander OPB, Brennan MÁ, Lötvall J, Breakefield XO, El Andaloussi S. 2019; Advances in therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles. Sci Transl Med. 11:eaav8521. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8521. PMID: 31092696. PMCID: PMC7104415.
54. Fan B, Wei Z, Yao X, et al. 2018; Microenvironment imbalance of spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant. 27:853–866. DOI: 10.1177/0963689718755778. PMID: 29871522. PMCID: PMC6050904.
55. Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Qian T. 2021; Inflammatory response to spinal cord injury and its treatment. World Neurosurg. 155:19–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.148. PMID: 34375779.
56. Hellenbrand DJ, Quinn CM, Piper ZJ, Morehouse CN, Fixel JA, Hanna AS. 2021; Inflammation after spinal cord injury: a review of the critical timeline of signaling cues and cellular infiltration. J Neuroinflammation. 18:284. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-021-02337-2. PMID: 34876174. PMCID: PMC8653609.
57. Fan L, Dong J, He X, Zhang C, Zhang T. 2021; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes reduce apoptosis and inflammatory response during spinal cord injury by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. Hum Exp Toxicol. 40:1612–1623. DOI: 10.1177/09603271211003311. PMID: 33779331.
58. Zhang M, Wang L, Huang S, He X. 2021; Exosomes with high level of miR-181c from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit inflammation and apoptosis to alleviate spinal cord injury. J Mol Histol. 52:301–311. DOI: 10.1007/s10735-020-09950-0. PMID: 33548000.
59. Nie H, Jiang Z. 2021; Bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles deliver microRNA-23b to alleviate spinal cord injury by targeting toll-like receptor TLR4 and inhibiting NF-κB pathway activation. Bioengineered. 12:8157–8172. DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1977562. PMID: 34663169. PMCID: PMC8806461.
60. Sung SE, Seo MS, Kim YI, et al. 2022; Human epidural AD-MSC exosomes improve function recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. Biomedicines. 10:678. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10030678. PMID: 35327480. PMCID: PMC8945172.
61. Zhou K, Shi L, Wang Y, Chen S, Zhang J. 2016; Recent advances of the NLRP3 inflammasome in central nervous system disorders. J Immunol Res. 2016:9238290. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9238290. PMID: 27652274. PMCID: PMC5019917.
62. Zhou C, Zheng J, Fan Y, Wu J. 2022; TI: NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pyroptosis in CNS trauma: a potential therapeu-tic target. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:821225. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.821225. PMID: 35186932. PMCID: PMC8847380.
63. Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA. 2016; Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 165:792–800. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.046. PMID: 27153493. PMCID: PMC5503689.
64. Chen J, Shen Y, Shao X, Wu W. 2023; An emerging role of inflammasomes in spinal cord injury and spinal cord tumor. Front Immunol. 14:1119591. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1119591. PMID: 36969234. PMCID: PMC10033975.
65. Majidpoor J, Khezri Z, Rostamzadeh P, et al. 2020; The expre-ssions of NLRP1, NLRP3, and AIM2 inflammasome complexes in the contusive spinal cord injury rat model and their responses to hormonal therapy. Cell Tissue Res. 381:397–410. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-020-03250-5. PMID: 32696217.
66. Jiang W, Li M, He F, Zhou S, Zhu L. 2017; Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome to attenuate spinal cord injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation. 14:207. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-017-0980-9. PMID: 29070054. PMCID: PMC5657095.
67. Zhang M, Wang L, Huang S, He X. 2020; MicroRNA-223 targets NLRP3 to relieve inflammation and alleviate spinal cord injury. Life Sci. 254:117796. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117796. PMID: 32417375.
68. Dai C, Liu B, Peng B, et al. 2021; Entinostat improves motor function and neuronal damage via downregulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation after spinal cord injury. Front Pharmacol. 12:774539. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.774539. PMID: 34899337. PMCID: PMC8664236.
69. Noonin C, Thongboonkerd V. 2021; Exosome-inflammasome crosstalk and their roles in inflammatory responses. Theranostics. 11:4436–4451. DOI: 10.7150/thno.54004. PMID: 33754070. PMCID: PMC7977448.
70. Huang JH, Fu CH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Cao Y, Lin FY. 2020; Extra-cellular vesicles derived from epidural fat-mesenchymal stem cells attenuate NLRP3 inflammasome activation and improve functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neu-rochem Res. 45:760–771. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-019-02950-x. PMID: 31953741.
71. Noori L, Arabzadeh S, Mohamadi Y, et al. 2021; Intrathecal administration of the extracellular vesicles derived from human Wharton's jelly stem cells inhibit inflammation and attenuate the activity of inflammasome complexes after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurosci Res. 170:87–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2020.07.011. PMID: 32717259.
72. Ginhoux F, Prinz M. 2015; Origin of microglia: current concepts and past controversies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 7:a020537. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020537. PMID: 26134003. PMCID: PMC4526747.
73. Alliot F, Godin I, Pessac B. 1999; Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 117:145–152. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-3806(99)00113-3. PMID: 10567732.
74. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Randolph GJ. 2014; Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity. 41:21–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.013. PMID: 25035951. PMCID: PMC4470379.
75. Zhou X, He X, Ren Y. 2014; Function of microglia and macrophages in secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 9:1787–1795. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.143423. PMID: 25422640. PMCID: PMC4239768.
76. David S, Kroner A. 2011; Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 12:388–399. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3053. PMID: 21673720.
77. Devanney NA, Stewart AN, Gensel JC. 2020; Microglia and macrophage metabolism in CNS injury and disease: the role of immunometabolism in neurodegeneration and neuro-trauma. Exp Neurol. 329:113310. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113310. PMID: 32289316. PMCID: PMC7237336.
78. Martinez FO, Gordon S. 2014; The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 6:13. DOI: 10.12703/p6-13. PMID: 24669294. PMCID: PMC3944738.
79. Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG. 2009; Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neuro-sci. 29:13435–13444. DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3257-09.2009. PMID: 19864556. PMCID: PMC2788152.
80. Chang Q, Hao Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhuo H, Zhao G. 2021; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-125a promotes M2 macrophage polarization in spinal cord injury by downregulating IRF5. Brain Res Bull. 170:199–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.02.015. PMID: 33609602.
81. Li R, Zhao K, Ruan Q, Meng C, Yin F. 2020; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-124-3p attenuates neurological damage in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury by downregulating Ern1 and promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Arthritis Res Ther. 22:75. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-2146-x. PMID: 32272965. PMCID: PMC7146970.
82. Liu W, Rong Y, Wang J, et al. 2020; Exosome-shuttled miR-216a-5p from hypoxic preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by shifting microglial M1/M2 polarization. J Neuroinflammation. 17:47. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-020-1726-7. PMID: 32019561. PMCID: PMC7001326.
83. Liu C, Hu F, Jiao G, et al. 2022; Dental pulp stem cell-derived exosomes suppress M1 macrophage polarization through the ROS-MAPK-NFκB P65 signaling pathway after spinal cord injury. J Nanobiotechnology. 20:65. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01273-4. PMID: 35109874. PMCID: PMC8811988.
84. Sofroniew MV. 2014; Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 7:a020420. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020420. PMID: 25380660. PMCID: PMC4315924.
85. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. 2010; Astrocytes: biology and patho-logy. Acta Neuropathol. 119:7–35. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8. PMID: 20012068. PMCID: PMC2799634.
86. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, et al. 2017; Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 541:481–487. DOI: 10.3410/f.727217936.793528237. PMID: 28099414. PMCID: PMC5404890.
87. Liddelow SA, Barres BA. 2017; Reactive astrocytes: production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity. 46:957–967. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.006. PMID: 28636962.
88. Wang L, Pei S, Han L, et al. 2018; Mesenchymal stem cell-deri-ved exosomes reduce A1 astrocytes via downregulation of phosphorylated NFκB P65 subunit in spinal cord injury. Cell Physiol Biochem. 50:1535–1559. DOI: 10.1159/000494652. PMID: 30376671.
89. Liu W, Wang Y, Gong F, et al. 2019; Exosomes derived from bone mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by suppressing the activation of A1 neurotoxic reactive astro-cytes. J Neurotrauma. 36:469–484. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5835. PMID: 29848167.
90. Lai X, Wang Y, Wang X, Liu B, Rong L. 2022; miR-146a-5p-modified hUCMSC-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cord function recovery by targeting neurotoxic astrocytes. Stem Cell Res Ther. 13:487. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-03116-3. PMID: 36175984. PMCID: PMC9524140.
91. Adams RH, Eichmann A. 2010; Axon guidance molecules in vascular patterning. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2:a001875. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001875. PMID: 20452960. PMCID: PMC2857165.
92. Himmels P, Paredes I, Adler H, et al. 2017; Motor neurons control blood vessel patterning in the developing spinal cord. Nat Commun. 8:14583. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14583. PMID: 28262664. PMCID: PMC5343469.
93. Oudega M. 2012; Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the role of blood vessels in spinal cord injury and repair. Cell Tissue Res. 349:269–288. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-012-1440-6. PMID: 22592628.
94. Losey P, Young C, Krimholtz E, Bordet R, Anthony DC. 2014; The role of hemorrhage following spinal-cord injury. Brain Res. 1569:9–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.04.033. PMID: 24792308.
95. Tsivelekas K, Evangelopoulos DS, Pallis D, et al. 2022; Angio-genesis in spinal cord injury: progress and treatment. Cureus. 14:e25475. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25475. PMID: 35800787. PMCID: PMC9246426.
96. Zhang C, Zhang C, Xu Y, Li C, Cao Y, Li P. 2020; Exosomes derived from human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve neurologic function by promoting angiogenesis after spinal cord injury. Neurosci Lett. 739:135399. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135399. PMID: 32979457.
97. Xue C, Shen Y, Li X, et al. 2018; Exosomes derived from hypoxia-treated human adipose mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis through the PKA signaling pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 27:456–465. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2017.0296. PMID: 29415626.
98. Mu J, Li L, Wu J, et al. 2022; Hypoxia-stimulated mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes loaded by adhesive hydrogel for effective angiogenic treatment of spinal cord injury. Biomater Sci. 10:1803–1811. DOI: 10.1039/d1bm01722e. PMID: 35234220.
99. Zhong D, Cao Y, Li CJ, et al. 2020; Neural stem cell-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cord functional recovery after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 245:54–65. DOI: 10.1177/1535370219895491. PMID: 31903774. PMCID: PMC6987743.
100. Luo Z, Peng W, Xu Y, et al. 2021; Exosomal OTULIN from M2 macrophages promotes the recovery of spinal cord injuries via stimulating Wnt/β-catenin pathway-mediated vascular regeneration. Acta Biomater. 136:519–532. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.026. PMID: 34551329.
101. Peng W, Wan L, Luo Z, et al. 2021; Microglia-derived exosomes improve spinal cord functional recovery after injury via inhibiting oxidative stress and promoting the survival and function of endothelia cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021:1695087. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1695087. PMID: 34484559. PMCID: PMC8413072.
102. Huang JH, Chen YN, He H, Fu CH, Xu ZY, Lin FY. 2023; Schwann cells-derived exosomes promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury by promoting angiogenesis. Front Cell Neurosci. 16:1077071.
103. Wirawan E, Vanden Berghe T, Lippens S, Agostinis P, Vandenabeele P. 2012; Autophagy: for better or for worse. Cell Res. 22:43–61. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.152. PMID: 18336290.
104. Avin-Wittenberg T. 2019; Autophagy and its role in plant abiotic stress management. Plant Cell Environ. 42:1045–1053. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13404. PMID: 29998609.
105. Zhang D, Wang F, Zhai X, Li XH, He XJ. 2018; Lithium promotes recovery of neurological function after spinal cord injury by inducing autophagy. Neural Regen Res. 13:2191–2199. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.241473. PMID: 30323152. PMCID: PMC6199946.
106. Ray SK. 2020; Modulation of autophagy for neuroprotection and functional recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 15:1601–1612. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.276322. PMID: 32209759. PMCID: PMC7437603.
107. Hao HH, Wang L, Guo ZJ, et al. 2013; Valproic acid reduces autophagy and promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurosci Bull. 29:484–492.
108. Muñoz-Galdeano T, Reigada D, Del Águila Á, et al. 2018; Cell specific changes of autophagy in a mouse model of contusive spinal cord injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 12:164. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00164. PMID: 29946241. PMCID: PMC6005838.
109. Shi Z, Yuan S, Shi L, et al. 2021; Programmed cell death in spinal cord injury pathogenesis and therapy. Cell Prolif. 54:e12992. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12992. PMID: 33506613. PMCID: PMC7941236.
110. Liao HY, Wang ZQ, Ran R, Zhou KS, Ma CW, Zhang HH. 2021; Biological functions and therapeutic potential of autophagy in spinal cord injury. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9:761273. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.761273. PMID: 34988074. PMCID: PMC8721099.
111. Al Mamun A, Wu Y, Monalisa I, et al. 2020; Role of pyroptosis in spinal cord injury and its therapeutic implications. J Adv Res. 28:97–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.004. PMID: 33364048. PMCID: PMC7753222.
112. Wang ZY, Lin JH, Muharram A, Liu WG. 2014; Beclin-1-mediated autophagy protects spinal cord neurons against mecha-nical injury-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis. 19:933–945. DOI: 10.1007/s10495-014-0976-1. PMID: 24623173.
113. Li W, Yao S, Li H, Meng Z, Sun X. 2021; Curcumin promotes functional recovery and inhibits neuronal apoptosis after spinal cord injury through the modulation of autophagy. J Spinal Cord Med. 44:37–45. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1616147. PMID: 31162984. PMCID: PMC7919922.
114. Li C, Jiao G, Wu W, et al. 2019; Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit neuronal apoptosis and promote motor function recovery via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Transplant. 28:1373–1383. DOI: 10.1177/0963689719870999. PMID: 31423807. PMCID: PMC6802144.
115. Kang J, Guo Y. 2022; Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes promote neurological function reco-very in a rat spinal cord injury model. Neurochem Res. 47:1532–1540. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-022-03545-9. PMID: 35132478.
116. Gu J, Jin ZS, Wang CM, Yan XF, Mao YQ, Chen S. 2020; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes improves spinal cord function after injury in rats by activating auto-phagy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 14:1621–1631. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S237502. PMID: 32425507. PMCID: PMC7196809.
117. Xu G, Ao R, Zhi Z, Jia J, Yu B. 2019; miR-21 and miR-19b delivered by hMSC-derived EVs regulate the apoptosis and differentiation of neurons in patients with spinal cord injury. J Cell Physiol. 234:10205–10217. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27690. PMID: 30387159.
118. Kang J, Li Z, Zhi Z, Wang S, Xu G. 2019; MiR-21 derived from the exosomes of MSCs regulates the death and differentia-tion of neurons in patients with spinal cord injury. Gene Ther. 26:491–503. DOI: 10.1038/s41434-019-0101-8. PMID: 31570818.
119. Zhou X, Chu X, Yuan H, et al. 2019; Mesenchymal stem cell derived EVs mediate neuroprotection after spinal cord injury in rats via the microRNA-21-5p/FasL gene axis. Biomed Pha-rmacother. 115:108818. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108818. PMID: 31102912.
120. Xiao X, Li W, Rong D, et al. 2021; Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles facilitate the repair of spinal cord injury via the miR-29b-3p/PTEN/Akt/mTOR axis. Cell Death Discov. 7:212. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-021-00572-3. PMID: 34381025. PMCID: PMC8357833.
121. Jia X, Huang G, Wang S, et al. 2021; Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells containing microRNA-381 protect against spinal cord injury in a rat model via the BRD4/WNT5A axis. Bone Joint Res. 10:328–339. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.105.BJR-2020-0020.R1. PMID: 34024119. PMCID: PMC8160032.
122. Liang Y, Wu JH, Zhu JH, Yang H. 2022; Exosomes secreted by hypoxia-pre-conditioned adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce neuronal apoptosis in rats with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 39:701–714. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0290. PMID: 35018814.
123. He X, Zhang J, Guo Y, Yang X, Huang Y, Hao D. 2022; Exosomal miR-9-5p derived from BMSCs alleviates apoptosis, inflam-mation and endoplasmic reticulum stress in spinal cord injury by regulating the HDAC5/FGF2 axis. Mol Immunol. 145:97–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.03.007. PMID: 35316648.
124. Huang T, Jia Z, Fang L, et al. 2022; Extracellular vesicle-derived miR-511-3p from hypoxia preconditioned adipose mesenchy-mal stem cells ameliorates spinal cord injury through the TRAF6/S1P axis. Brain Res Bull. 180:73–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.12.015. PMID: 34974133.
125. Bartanusz V, Jezova D, Alajajian B, Digicaylioglu M. 2011; The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implica-tions. Ann Neurol. 70:194–206. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22421. PMID: 21674586.
126. Reinhold AK, Rittner HL. 2017; Barrier function in the peripheral and central nervous system-a review. Pflugers Arch. 469:123–134. DOI: 10.1007/s00424-016-1920-8. PMID: 27957611.
127. Jin LY, Li J, Wang KF, et al. 2021; Blood-spinal cord barrier in spinal cord injury: a review. J Neurotrauma. 38:1203–1224. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7413. PMID: 33292072.
128. Jo DH, Kim JH, Heo JI, Kim JH, Cho CH. 2013; Interaction between pericytes and endothelial cells leads to formation of tight junction in hyaloid vessels. Mol Cells. 36:465–471. DOI: 10.1007/s10059-013-0228-1. PMID: 24213675. PMCID: PMC3887934.
129. Lu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang R, et al. 2019; Bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote recovery following spinal cord injury via improvement of the integrity of the blood-spinal cord barrier. Front Neurosci. 13:209. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00209. PMID: 30914918. PMCID: PMC6423165.
130. Zhou Y, Wen LL, Li YF, et al. 2022; Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells protect the injured spinal cord by inhibiting pericyte pyroptosis. Neural Regen Res. 17:194–202. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.314323. PMID: 34100456. PMCID: PMC8451579.
131. Xin W, Qiang S, Jianing D, et al. 2021; Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes attenuate blood-spinal cord barrier disruption via the TIMP2/MMP pathway after acute spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 58:6490–6504. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-021-02565-w. PMID: 34554399.
132. Nakazaki M, Morita T, Lankford KL, Askenase PW, Kocsis JD. 2021; Small extracellular vesicles released by infused mesenchymal stromal cells target M2 macrophages and promote TGF-β upregulation, microvascular stabilization and functional recovery in a rodent model of severe spinal cord injury. J Extracell Vesicles. 10:e12137. DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12137. PMID: 34478241. PMCID: PMC8408371.
133. de Freria CM, Van Niekerk E, Blesch A, Lu P. 2021; Neural stem cells: promoting axonal regeneration and spinal cord connec-tivity. Cells. 10:3296. DOI: 10.3390/cells10123296. PMID: 34943804. PMCID: PMC8699545.
134. Zhang Y, Chopp M, Liu XS, et al. 2017; Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stromal cells promote axonal growth of cortical neurons. Mol Neurobiol. 54:2659–2673. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-9851-0. PMID: 26993303. PMCID: PMC5028236.
135. Lopez-Verrilli MA, Caviedes A, Cabrera A, Sandoval S, Wyneken U, Khoury M. 2016; Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes from different sources selectively promote neuritic outgrowth. Neuroscience. 320:129–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.061. PMID: 26851773.
136. Zhou W, Silva M, Feng C, et al. 2021; Exosomes derived from human placental mesenchymal stem cells enhanced the recovery of spinal cord injury by activating endogenous neurogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12:174. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02248-2. PMID: 33712072. PMCID: PMC7953814.
137. Li C, Li X, Shi Z, et al. 2022; Exosomes from LPS-preconditioned bone marrow MSCs accelerated peripheral nerve regeneration via M2 macrophage polarization: involvement of TSG-6/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Exp Neurol. 356:114139. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114139. PMID: 35690131.
138. Wang Y, Lai X, Wu D, Liu B, Wang N, Rong L. 2021; Umbilical mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cord functional recovery through the miR-199a-3p/145-5p-mediated NGF/TrkA signaling pathway in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12:117. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02148-5. PMID: 33579361. PMCID: PMC7879635.
139. Han T, Song P, Wu Z, et al. 2022; MSC secreted extracellular vesi-cles carrying TGF-beta upregulate Smad 6 expression and promote the regrowth of neurons in spinal cord injured rats. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 18:1078–1096. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-021-10219-6. PMID: 34449013. PMCID: PMC8942898.
140. Wang Y, Han T, Guo R, et al. 2022; Micro-RNA let-7a-5p derived from mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promotes the regrowth of neurons in spinal-cord-injured rats by targeting the HMGA2/SMAD2 axis. Front Mol Neurosci. 15:850364. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.850364. PMID: 35401112. PMCID: PMC8990843.
141. Batrakova EV, Kim MS. 2015; Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J Control Release. 219:396–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.030. PMID: 26241750. PMCID: PMC4656109.
142. Mondal J, Pillarisetti S, Junnuthula V, et al. 2023; Hybrid exosomes, exosome-like nanovesicles and engineered exosomes for therapeutic applications. J Control Release. 353:1127–1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.027. PMID: 36528193.
143. Luan X, Sansanaphongpricha K, Myers I, Chen H, Yuan H, Sun D. 2017; Engineering exosomes as refined biological nanoplatforms for drug delivery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 38:754–763. DOI: 10.1038/aps.2017.12. PMID: 28392567. PMCID: PMC5520184.
144. Li C, Li X, Zhao B, Wang C. 2020; Exosomes derived from miR-544-modified mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch Physiol Biochem. 126:369–375. DOI: 10.1080/13813455.2019.1691601. PMID: 32141339.
145. Li D, Zhang P, Yao X, et al. 2018; Exosomes derived from miR-133b-modified mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Neurosci. 12:845. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00845. PMID: 30524227. PMCID: PMC6262643.
146. Huang JH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Lin FY. 2020; Exosomes derived from miR-126-modified MSCs promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis and attenuate apoptosis after spinal cord injury in rats. Neuroscience. 424:133–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.043. PMID: 31704348.
147. Ren ZW, Zhou JG, Xiong ZK, Zhu FZ, Guo XD. 2019; Effect of exosomes derived from MiR-133b-modified ADSCs on the recovery of neurological function after SCI. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 23:52–60. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201901_16747. PMID: 30657546.
148. Yu T, Zhao C, Hou S, Zhou W, Wang B, Chen Y. 2019; Exo-somes secreted from miRNA-29b-modified mesenchymal stem cells repaired spinal cord injury in rats. Braz J Med Biol Res. 52:e8735. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20198735. PMID: 31826179. PMCID: PMC6903804.
149. Zhang A, Bai Z, Yi W, Hu Z, Hao J. 2021; Overexpression of miR-338-5p in exosomes derived from mesenchymal stromal cells provides neuroprotective effects by the Cnr1/Rap1/Akt pathway after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurosci Lett. 761:136124. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136124. PMID: 34302891.
150. Chen J, Zhu C, Jia W, Wang J, Gu L. 2020; MiR-455-5p attenuates cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury by targeting FLT3. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 76:627–634. DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000898. PMID: 32833902.
151. Liu B, Zheng W, Dai L, Fu S, Shi E. 2022; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomal miR-455-5p protects against spinal cord ischemia reperfusion injury. Tissue Cell. 74:101678. DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101678. PMID: 34823099.
152. Chen Y, Tian Z, He L, et al. 2021; Exosomes derived from miR-26a-modified MSCs promote axonal regeneration via the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway following spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12:224. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02282-0. PMID: 33820561. PMCID: PMC8022427.
153. Sheng Y, Zhou X, Wang J, et al. 2021; MSC derived EV loaded with miRNA-22 inhibits the inflammatory response and nerve fun-ction recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. J Cell Mol Med. 25:10268–10278. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16965. PMID: 34609045. PMCID: PMC8572783.
154. Huang W, Lin M, Yang C, et al. 2021; Rat bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes loaded with miR-494 promoting neurofilament regeneration and behavioral function recovery after spinal cord injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021:1634917. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1634917. PMID: 34635862. PMCID: PMC8501401.
155. Jiang Z, Zhang J. 2021; Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes containing miR-145-5p reduce inflammation in spinal cord injury by regulating the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell Cycle. 20:993–1009. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2021.1919825. PMID: 33945431. PMCID: PMC8172161.
156. Ren Z, Qi Y, Sun S, Tao Y, Shi R. 2020; Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: hope for spinal cord injury repair. Stem Cells Dev. 29:1467–1478. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2020.0133. PMID: 33045910.
157. Rao D, Huang D, Sang C, Zhong T, Zhang Z, Tang Z. 2022; Adva-nces in mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as drug deli-very vehicles. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 9:797359. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.797359. PMID: 35186913. PMCID: PMC8854766.
158. Li Q, Fu X, Kou Y, Han N. 2023; Engineering strategies and optimized delivery of exosomes for theranostic application in nerve tissue. Theranostics. 13:4266–4286. DOI: 10.7150/thno.84971. PMID: 37554270. PMCID: PMC10405842.

Fig. 1
Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI). BSCB: blood-spinal cord barrier.
ijsc-17-3-236-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Exosome formation, secretion, and action on target cells. Formation of mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos): ① Endocytosis: The extracellular component and cell surface protein are engulfed into the cells through the invagination of the plasma membrane to form an early endosome (EE); ② First exchange: The EE could initially exchange goods with the Golgi network and endoplasmic reticulum to form the late endosome (LE); ③ Secondary exchange: LE conducts cargo exchange again through the second plasma membrane invagination and finally forms intraluminal vesicles (ILVs), and the collection of multiple ILVs of different sizes is called a multivesicular body (MVB); ④ Plasma membrane budding: Some MVBs release exosomes extracellularly through plasma membrane budding; ⑤ Recycling: Some MVBs can be degraded by lysosomal fusion, and the degradation products can be recovered by cells. The structure of MSCs-Exos: Exosomes express tetraspanins (CD81, CD63, and CD9), heat shock proteins (HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90), ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix), TSG101, integrins, flotillin, surface markers (CD44, CD73, and CD90) and adhesion molecules (CD29, CD44, and CD73). In addition, MSCs-Exos carry nucleic acids, proteins, and enzymes. Exosomes enter recipient cells in three ways: ⑥ receptor-mediated entry, ⑦ direct membrane fusion, and ⑧ endocytosis.
ijsc-17-3-236-f2.tif
Fig. 3
The mechanism by which mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) regulate the immune response. Bone marrow stem cell (BMSC)-Exos can regulate the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway to produce the production of anti-inflammatory factors. MSCs-Exos with miR-181c and miR-23b can inhibit the formation of microglia via the Phosphatase and Tensin homolog (PTEN) signaling pathway and inhibit the TLR4/NF-κB pathway to inhibit the production of proinflammatory factors. Epidural fat (EF)-MSCs-Exos and human Wharton’s jelly (HWJ)-MSCs-Exos can inhibit the NLRP3 activation to inhibit the production of proinflammatory factors. MSCs-Exos with miR-125a and miR-124-3p can inhibit M2 macrophage polarization by regulating the IRF5 and Ern1 signaling pathways. MSCs-Exos with miR-216a-5p can inhibit M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB and activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. MSCs-Exos can inhibit the NFκB p65 signaling pathway to reduce astrocyte toxicity. MSCs-Exos with miR-146a-5p can inhibit the Traf6/Irak1/NF-κB signaling pathway to reduce astrocyte toxicity.
ijsc-17-3-236-f3.tif
Fig. 4
The mechanism by which mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) promotes angiogenesis and regulates blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) integrity. MSCs-Exos can promote angiogenesis by promoting the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) via the PKA signaling pathway. BMSC-Exos can suppress pericyte pyroptosis and inhibit pericyte migration by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway to maintain BSCB integrity. MSCs-Exos could increase the expression of cell junction proteins via the TIMP2/MMP pathway to attenuate the destruction of the BSCB. MSCs-Exos could reduce BSCB permeability by targeting M2 macrophages to upregulate TGFβ and TGFβ receptor expression.
ijsc-17-3-236-f4.tif
Fig. 5
The mechanism by which mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) regulates apoptosis and autophagy. Bone marrow stem cell (BMSC)-Exos can inhibit apoptosis by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. human umbilical cord (HUC)-MSCs-Exos can regulate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and the Bcl-2/Bax axis to inhibit apoptosis. MSCs-Exos with miR-19b and miR-181c can inhibit apoptosis via the Phosphatase and Tensin homolog (PTEN) signaling pathways. MSCs-Exos with miR-21 can inhibit apoptosis via the PTEN and PDCD4 signaling pathways. MSCs-Exos with miR-21-5p and miR-29b-3p can inhibit apoptosis by regulating the FasL signaling pathway and activating the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. MSCs-Exos with miR-381 can inhibit apoptosis via BRD4/WNT5A signaling pathways. MSCs-Exos with miR-499-5p inhibits the JNK3/MAPK10 and JNK3/c-jun signaling pathways to inhibit apoptosis. MSCs-Exos with miR-9-5p and miR-511-3P could regulate the HDAC5/FGF2 and TRAF6/S1P signaling pathways to inhibit apoptosis. MSCs-Exos could regulate the autophagy-related proteins LC3IIB and Beclin-1 to promote autophagy.
ijsc-17-3-236-f5.tif
Fig. 6
The mechanism by which mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes (MSCs-Exos) promotes axonal growth and neuronal regeneration. MSCs-Exos can promote axonal growth by promoting M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the NF-κb/NLRP3 signaling pathway. MSCs-Exos with miR-199a-3p/145-5p can target Cblb/Cbl mRNAs to inhibit the NGF/TrkA pathway to promote axonal growth. Human placenta (HP)-MSCs-Exos can promote neuronal regeneration by activating the MEK/ERK/CREB signaling pathway. MSCs-Exos could attenuate R-Smad 6 expression to promote neuronal regeneration by carrying TGFβ. MSCs-Exos with miR-let-7a-5p downregulated SMAD2 expression by inhibiting HMGA2 to promote neuronal regeneration.
ijsc-17-3-236-f6.tif
Table 1
Current preclinical studies on MSCs-Exos in the treatment of spinal cord injury
References Types of exosomes Research objects Type of miRNA Mechanism Effect
(57) BMSC-Exos Rat and PC12 cell - Inhibit the TLR4/MyD88 /NF-κB pathway Inhibit the inflammatory response and apoptosis
(58) BMSC-Exos Rat miR-181c Inhibit the PTEN and NF-κB signaling pathway Reduce spinal cord inflammation and apoptosis
(59) BMSC-Exos Rat and BV2 cells miR-23b Inhibit TLR4/NF-κB pathway Attenuate the inflammatory cytokine response
(60) AD-MSCs-Exos Rat - - Inhibit the release of proinflammatory cytokines
(70) EF-MSCs-Exos Rat - Inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation, decrease the level of pro-apoptotic protein Bax Reduce the expression of inflammatory cytokines and reduce apoptosis
(71) HWJ-MSCs-Exos Rat - Decrease the expression of caspase 1 Attenuate neuroinflammation
(80) BMSC-Exos Rat miR-125a Negatively regulate IRF5 expression Promote M2 macrophage polarization and reduce the inflammatory response
(81) BMSC-Exos Rat miR-124-3p Negatively regulate Ern1 expression Promote M2 macrophage polarization
(82) MSCs-Exos Mice miR-216a-5p Inhibit TLR4/NF-κB and activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway Promote M2 macrophage polarization
(88) BMSC-Exos Rat - Inhibit nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 Reduce A1 astrocytes
(89) BMSC-Exos Rat - - Suppress activation of A1 neurotoxic reactive
(90) HUC-MSCs-Exos Rat miR-146a-5p Inhibit the Traf6/Irak1/ NFκB pathway Reduces the toxic effects of neurotoxic astrocytes
(96) HP-MSCs-Exos Mice - - Promote the new vessel formation
(97) MSCs-Exos Endothelial cells - Rromote VEGF expression through activation of PKA signaling pathway Enhance angiogenesis
(98) MSCs-Exos Rat - - Promote the new vessel formation
(114) BMSC-Exos Rat - Activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway Inhibit neuronal apoptosis
(115) HUC-MSCs-Exos Rat - Regulate BCL2/Bax and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways Anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammatory
(116) BMSC-Exos Rat - Regulate the expression of pro-apoptoticprotein cleaved caspase-3，anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, and autophagy-related proteins LC3IIB and Beclin-1 Promote autophagy to reduce neuronal apoptosis
(117) MSCs-Exos Rat and SH-SY5Y cells miR-21 and miR-19b Regulate PTEN expression Regulate the apoptosis and differentiation of neuron cells
(118) MSCs-Exos Rat miR-21 Regulate PDCD4 and PTEN expression Inhibit the apoptosis of neurons
(119) MSCs-Exos Rat miR-21-5p Downregulate the expression of the pro-apoptotic target gene FasL Inhibit the apoptosis of neurons
(120) MSCs-Exos Rat miR-29b-3p Activate the Akt/mTOR pathway through the PTEN axis Inhibit the apoptosis of neurons
(121) MSC-Exos Rat miR-381 Downregulate the BRD4/ WnT5A axis Reverse neuronal apoptosis
(122) AD-MSCs -Exos Rat miR-499-5p Inhibit JNK3/MAPK10 and negatively regulate the JNK3/c-jun signaling pathway Regulate neuronal apoptosis
(123) BMSC-Exos Rat and PC12 cell miR-9-5p Regulate the HDAC5/FGF2 axis Alleviate apoptosis and inflammation
(124) AD-MSCs-Exos Rat and PC12 cell miR-511-3p Regulate TRAF6/S1P axis Inhibit neuronal apoptosis and inflammatory
(129) BMSC-Exos Rat - Activate the NF-κB signaling pathway Maintain BSCB integrity
(130) BMSC-Exos Rat - Suppress pericyte pyroptosis Maintain BSCB integrity
(131) MSCs-Exos Rat - Increase the expression of cell junction proteins via the TIMP2/MMP pathway Attenuate the destruction of the BSCB
(132) MSCs-Exos Rat - Upregulate TGFβ, TGFβ receptors, and tight junction proteins Reduce BSCB permeability
(134,
135)		 MSCs-Exos Cortical neurons - - Promote the growth of axons in neurons
(136) HP-MSCs-Exos Rat - Activate of the MEK/ERK/CREB signaling pathway Neural progenitor cells activation and neurogenesis
(137) MSCs-Exos Rat - Inhibit the NF-κb/NLRP3 signaling pathway Promote axon regeneration and myelin regeneration
(138) HUC-MSCs-Exos Rat and PC12 cell miR-199a-3p/145-5p Regulate NGF/TrkA signaling pathway Promote axonal growth
(139) MSCs-Exos Rat - Upregulate R-Smad 6 expression by carrying TGFβ Promote neuronal regeneration
(140) MSCs-Exos Rat miR-let- 7a-5p Regulate the HMGA2/ SMAD2 axis Promote neuronal regeneration

MSCs-Exos: mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes, miRNA: microRNA, BMSC: bone marrow stem cell, PTEN: Phosphatase and Tensin homolog, AD: adipose tissue, EF: epidural fat, HWJ: human Wharton’s jelly, HUC: human umbilical cord, HP: human placenta, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor, BSCB: blood-spinal cord barrier.

TOOLS
Similar articles