Metformin Suppresses Both PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells and Cancer-Induced PD-1 Expression in Immune Cells to Promote Antitumor Immunity

Su Hwan Park; Juheon Lee; Hye Jin Yun; Seok-Ho Kim; Jong-Ho Lee

doi:10.3343/alm.2023.0443

Journal List > Ann Lab Med > v.44(5) > 1516087437

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Park, Lee, Yun, Kim, and Lee: Metformin Suppresses Both PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells and Cancer-Induced PD-1 Expression in Immune Cells to Promote Antitumor Immunity

Original Article

Transfusion and Cell Therapy

Ann Lab Med 2024;44(5):426-436.

Published online: 26 March 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0443

Metformin Suppresses Both PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells and Cancer-Induced PD-1 Expression in Immune Cells to Promote Antitumor Immunity

Su Hwan Park, M.S.^1,^*

, Juheon Lee, M.S.^1,^*

, Hye Jin Yun, B.S.¹

, Seok-Ho Kim, Ph.D.^1,^2,

, Jong-Ho Lee, Ph.D.^1,^3,

¹Department of Health Sciences, The Graduate School of Dong-A University, Busan, Korea

²Department of Medicinal Biotechnology, College of Health Science, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea

³Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea

Corresponding author: Jong-Ho Lee, Ph.D., Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 beon-gil, Saha-gu, Busan 49315, Korea, E-mail: Topljh19@dau.ac.kr

Co-corresponding author:, Seok-Ho Kim, Ph.D., Department of Medicinal Biotechnology, College of Health Science, Dong-A University, 37 Nakdong-daero 550 beon-gil, Saha-gu, Busan 49315, Korea, E-mail: cvaccine@dau.ac.kr

Equal contributor:

^* These authors contributed equally to this study as co-first authors.

Received 9 November 2023 Revised 3 January 2024 Accepted 4 March 2024

(open-access):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Metformin, a drug prescribed for patients with type 2 diabetes, has potential efficacy in enhancing antitumor immunity; however, the detailed underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to identify the inhibitory molecular mechanisms of metformin on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in cancer cells and programmed death 1 (PD-1) expression in immune cells.

Methods

We employed a luciferase reporter assay, quantitative real-time PCR, immunoblotting analysis, immunoprecipitation and ubiquitylation assays, and a natural killer (NK) cell-mediated tumor cell cytotoxicity assay. A mouse xenograft tumor model was used to evaluate the effect of metformin on tumor growth, followed by flow-cytometric analysis using tumor-derived single-cell suspensions.

Results

Metformin decreased AKT-mediated β-catenin S552 phosphorylation and subsequent β-catenin transactivation in an adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation-dependent manner, resulting in reduced CD274 (encoding PD-L1) transcription in cancer cells. Tumor-derived soluble factors enhanced PD-1 protein stability in NK and T cells via dissociation of PD-1 from ubiquitin E3 ligases and reducing PD-1 polyubiquitylation. Metformin inhibited the tumor-derived soluble factor-reduced binding of PD-1 to E3 ligases and PD-1 polyubiquitylation, resulting in PD-1 protein downregulation in an AMPK activation-dependent manner. These inhibitory effects of metformin on both PD-L1 and PD-1 expression ameliorated cancer-reduced cytotoxic activity of immune cells in vitro and decreased tumor immune evasion and growth in vivo.

Conclusions

Metformin blocks both PD-L1 and PD-1 within the tumor microenvironment. This study provided a mechanistic insight into the efficacy of metformin in improving immunotherapy in human cancer.

Keywords: E3 ligase, Immunotherapy, Metformin, PD-L1, PD-1, Tumor immune evasion

INTRODUCTION

Tumor immune escape is a common feature and hallmark of primary malignant tumors. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), cancer cells can evade immune surveillance by infiltrated cytotoxic lymphocytes, including CD8⁺ T and natural killer (NK) cells, which is induced via interaction between the immune checkpoint molecules programmed cell death 1 (PD-1, encoded by PDCD1) on cytotoxic lymphocytes and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1, encoded by CD274) on cancer cells [1, 2]. PD-L1/PD-1 signaling inhibits the antitumor activities of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes, resulting in enhanced immune evasion-induced tumor growth [3]. PD-L1 is upregulated in many human tumor types [3, 4] and is correlated with poor prognosis [5, 6]. PD-L1 expression in the TME can be upregulated at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels by numerous factors, including inflammatory stimuli and oncogenic pathways [3]. We have previously reported that β-catenin transactivation, which has been detected in various cancer types [7], can induce the transcriptional upregulation of CD274 in an AKT-mediated β-catenin S552 phosphorylation-dependent manner [4]. In addition, PD-1 levels are elevated in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes in many TME types compared with those in normal tissues [8 -10]. However, the precise mechanisms by which the TME upregulates PD-1 expression remain unknown.

Metformin is the most widely used drug for treating type 2 diabetes. Epidemiological studies have shown that patients with diabetes treated with metformin have reduced cancer and cancer-related mortality risks [11]. Accumulating evidence from preclinical studies shows that metformin exerts antitumor effects [12]. Moreover, metformin reportedly enhances the sensitivity to radiotherapy [13] and chemotherapy [14], particularly when standard chemotherapeutic agents are used at suboptimal doses [15]. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of the respiratory chain and causes energy depletion, which activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [16], a major sensor of the energy status of cells, and subsequently inhibits the mechanistic target of rapamycin [17], thus restraining cancer growth. Metformin also elicits anticancer effects independent of AMPK [18, 19]. Metformin reportedly promotes antitumor immunity by downregulating PD-L1 expression in several cancer cell types [20 -22]. However, most studies on the antitumor immune activity of metformin focused on PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, not on PD-1 expression in infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes within the TME. In addition, the detailed molecular mechanisms of metformin-mediated antitumor immunity are not well understood.

We aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which the TME upregulates PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes and whether metformin can reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment by modulating immune checkpoint expression (i.e., PD-L1 and PD-1), and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that metformin can downregulate both PD-L1 expression in cancer cells and cancer-induced PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes and thus may induce antitumor immunity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Luciferase reporter gene assay

Transcriptional activities of TCF/LEF-1 in A431 cells were measured as described previously [23]. Relative luciferase activity levels were normalized to those in untreated cells or that in the Renilla control plasmid. Each assay was performed at least three times.

NK cell-mediated tumor cell cytotoxicity assay

A431 cells were used as target cells, and human primary NK cells (purified from cord blood of healthy donors in Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea [2-1040709-AB-N-01-202303- BR-002-02]) were used as effector cells. Before inducing cytotoxicity, A431 cells and NK cells were pretreated or not with metformin for 24 hrs. The A431 cells were then labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; CFSE Cell Division Tracker Kit, #423801; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) at 37°C for 30 mins. Target cell cytotoxicity was initiated by coculture with NK cells at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 1:1 for 4 hrs. After coculture, the A431 cells were harvested and stained with Fixable Viability Dye (FVD; #65-0865-14; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). After 20 mins, the cells were washed and subjected to flow-cytometric analysis. CFSE/FVD-double-positive cells were regarded as dead cells.

Animal studies

C56BL/6 mice were obtained from OrientBio (Seongnam, Korea) and were housed in the animal facility of Dong-A University. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant institutional and national guidelines. All animal procedures and maintenance conditions were approved by the Dong-A University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (DIACUC-21-48). We subcutaneously injected 5×10⁵ B16F10 murine melanoma cells into five-week-old male C56BL/6 mice (N=5 mice/group). On day 3 post-tumor implantation, 200 mg/kg of metformin dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was intraperitoneally injected daily. Mice in the control group were injected with the same volume of PBS. At 20 days after tumor implantation, the mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide inhalation to analyze tumor volume and weight, followed by flow-cytometric analysis.

Other methods

Materials, cell culture, transfection, DNA constructs, quantitative real-time PCR analysis, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis, ubiquitylation assay, preparation of conditioned medium (CM), and flow cytometric analysis are available in the supplemental materials.

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data are presented as the mean±SD of at least three independent experiments. The normality of the data was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk test. Means of two groups were compared using Student’s t-test. Means of more than two groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Normality and homogeneity assumptions were met. The SPSS statistical package version 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Values of P<0.05 indicated statistically significant differences.

Results

Metformin inhibits both PD-L1 expression in cancer cells and PD-1 expression in infiltrating immune cells in the TME

To determine the effects of metformin on immune checkpoints in the TME, C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously implanted with B16F10 murine melanoma cells, followed by intraperitoneal administration of metformin (Fig. 1A). We did not observe any abnormalities in mouse body weight or behavior. However, metformin effectively exhibited anticancer activity in B16F10 cell-harboring mice, as reflected by decreases in tumor volume and weight (Fig. 1B–1D). B16F10 tumors were extracted, dissociated to obtain single-cell suspensions, and subjected to flow-cytometric analysis. As shown in Fig. 1E, metformin significantly suppressed PD-L1 expression on the surface of B16F10 cancer cells. Consistent with previous findings [8 -10], PD-1 expression on the surfaces of tumor-infiltrating NK and CD8⁺ T cells was significantly upregulated compared with that on splenic naïve NK and CD8⁺ T cells (Supplemental Data Fig. S1A). Notably, we found that metformin also suppressed PD-1 expression on the surfaces of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating NK and CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 1F).

Based on the inhibitory effects of metformin on both PD-L1 and PD-1 expression, we performed an NK cell killing assay using human primary NK cells and A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells. We cocultured metformin-pretreated A431 cells with metformin-pretreated human primary NK cells and found that metformin treatment significantly induced NK cell-mediated cancer cell death compared with that in the untreated control (Supplemental Data Fig. S1B). These results suggest that metformin downregulates PD-L1 expression on cancer cells and PD-1 expression on infiltrating immune cells (NK and CD8⁺ T cells) to reduce tumor cell immune evasion in the TME.

Metformin inhibits the transcriptional expression of PD-L1 in an AMPK-downregulated AKT/β-catenin signaling-dependent manner

To determine the mechanism by which metformin downregulates PD-L1 expression on cancer cells, we treated A375SM human melanoma cells, A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, U87MG and U251 glioblastoma (GBM) cells, and MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cells with metformin. Quantitative PCR and immunoblotting analyses showed that metformin treatment significantly inhibited CD274 (encoding PD-L1) mRNA expression (Fig. 2A) and PD-L1 protein expression (Fig. 2B) in a dose-dependent manner.

We previously reported that AKT-mediated β-catenin S552 phosphorylation is instrumental for β-catenin transcriptional activity to enhance CD274 transcription [4]. Therefore, we investigated the effect of metformin on AKT/β-catenin signaling. As shown in Fig. 2C, metformin increased AMPK Thr172 phosphorylation, which is consistent with previous findings [16]. It significantly inhibited AKT S473 phosphorylation and β-catenin S552 phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. In line with these results, metformin treatment suppressed β-catenin transcriptional activity (TOP-FLASH) in A431 cells (Fig. 2D). Notably, the inhibitory effects of metformin on β-catenin transcriptional activity (Fig. 2E and 2H), CD274 mRNA expression (Fig. 2F and 2I), and PD-L1 protein expression (Fig. 2G and 2J) were abrogated upon expression of a constitutively active (CA-) β-catenin mutant or myristoylated AKT1 (myr-AKT1) in A431 cells. These results demonstrate that metformin inhibits the transcriptional expression of PD-L1 by downregulating AKT/β-catenin signaling.

AMPK is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway in cancer cells [24]. Ectopic expression of CA-AMPK inhibited AKT S473 phosphorylation, resulting in decreased β-catenin S552 phosphorylation and PD-L1 expression in A431 cells (Supplemental Data Fig. S2). We next examined whether the suppressive effect of metformin on AKT/β-catenin signaling was mediated via AMPK activation. Metformin-inhibited AKT S473 phosphorylation and β-catenin S552 phosphorylation (Fig. 2K) and subsequent PD-L1 expression (Fig. 2L) were significantly reversed upon treatment with compound C, a pharmacological inhibitor of AMPK. These results suggest that metformin inhibits PD-L1 expression in an AMPK-reduced AKT/β-catenin signaling-dependent manner.

Cancer cells enhance PD-1 protein stability in NK and T cells

Consistent with previous reports showing that PD-1 levels are markedly elevated in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in many TME types compared with those in normal tissues [8 -10], we observed an increase in PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating NK and CD8⁺ T cells within B16F10 tumors (Fig. 1). However, the specific molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Tumor-derived soluble factors within the TME provide an immunosuppressive environment [25]. To identify the role of cancer-secreted factors in PD-1 expression on immune cells, we collected CM from A431 or B16F10 cells and then treated NK-92 natural killer cells, Jurkat cells, mouse primary splenocytes, and human primary NK cells with the CM. Quantitative PCR and immunoblotting analyses showed that tumor CM treatment substantially enhanced PD-1 protein expression (Fig. 3A upper panel and Supplemental Data Fig. S3 upper panel), whereas no significant alterations were detected in the mRNA expression of Pdcd1 (encoding PD-1) in these four cell types (Fig. 3A lower panel and Supplemental Data Fig. 3 lower panel). To determine whether the tumor CM-induced increase in PD-1 expression resulted from increased PD-1 stability, we pretreated NK-92 and Jurkat cells with cycloheximide (CHX) to block protein synthesis. CHX did not reduce the fold induction of PD-1 expression upon CM treatment (Fig. 3B). In addition, tumor CM treatment increased the half-life of endogenous PD-1 (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that tumor CM enhances PD-1 expression primarily by enhancing PD-1 stability.

Several E3 ubiquitin ligases, including FBXO38 [26], c-Cbl [27], and KLHL22 [28], target PD-1 protein for degradation. To determine the effect of tumor CM on the association between corresponding E3 ligases and PD-1, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays and found that tumor CM treatment significantly disrupted the binding of endogenous PD-1 to all three endogenous E3 ligases without affecting the expression levels of the E3 ligases (Fig. 3D). Concordantly, ubiquitylation assays revealed that tumor CM treatment decreased PD-1 polyubiquitylation in NK-92 and Jurkat cells (Fig. 3E). These results suggest that tumor-derived soluble factors induce PD-1 stability via dissociation of PD-1 from E3 ligases.

Metformin inhibits cancer-enhanced PD-1 expression via AMPK-dependent deregulation of PD-1 protein stability

We next determined the effect of metformin on tumor CM-induced PD-1 expression. We found that tumor CM-induced increases in PD-1 protein levels were significantly suppressed by metformin in NK-92 and Jurkat cells, mouse primary splenocytes, and human primary NK cells (Fig. 4A and Supplemental Data Fig. S4). To determine the mechanism underlying the metformin-induced PD-1 protein expression suppression, we treated NK-92 and Jurkat cells with a proteasome inhibitor, MG132, which blocked metformin-reduced PD-1 protein expression (Fig. 4B), indicating that metformin induced proteasomal degradation of PD-1 protein. Concordantly, metformin treatment reduced the CM-induced increase in the half-life of endogenous PD-1 in NK-92 and Jurkat cells (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation and ubiquitylation assays showed that metformin treatment reversed the tumor CM-induced reduction in the binding of endogenous E3 ligases (FBXO38, c-Cbl, and KLHL22) to endogenous PD-1 (Fig. 4D) and PD-1 polyubiquitylation (Fig. 4E), whereas it did not affect the expression levels of the E3 ligases (Fig. 4D lower panel).

To address the specific role of AMPK in PD-1 expression, 293T cells were cotransfected with PD-1 and CA-AMPK. The results revealed that AMPK activation abolished the tumor CM-induced increase in PD-1 expression and decrease in PD-1 polyubiquitylation (Fig. 4F). Moreover, the level of PD-1 polyubiquitylation was decreased in AMPKα1/2 double-knockout (DKO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) compared with that in wild-type (WT) AMPK-expressing MEFs (Fig. 4G). These findings suggested that AMPK negatively regulates PD-1 protein stability. Therefore, we next determined whether the inhibitory effect of metformin on PD-1 expression would be mediated by AMPK activation. Treatment with a pharmacological inhibitor of AMPK compound C blocked the metformin-induced decrease in PD-1 expression (Fig. 4H) and increase in PD-1 polyubiquitylation (Fig. 4I) in NK-92 and Jurkat cells. Collectively, these results indicate that metformin inhibits tumor-derived soluble factor-induced PD-1 expression via AMPK-dependent downregulation of PD-1 protein stability.

DISCUSSION

The representative immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD-1 are overexpressed in the TME. They play a crucial role in tumor immune evasion, resulting in enhanced tumor growth and a poor prognosis [3]. Therefore, the blockade of PD-L1/PD-1 signaling is recognized as an attractive strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Therapeutics targeting PD-L1/PD-1 signaling result in tumor regression in several cancer types, including melanoma and lung cancer [2, 3]. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of PD-L1/PD-1 antagonists against solid tumors is currently unsatisfactory. Only a portion of patients respond to immunotherapy [3]. This hurdle must be overcome, and alternative agents must be explored to expand their benefits and improve their efficacy and, consequently, patient prognosis. Recent studies have shown that metformin treatment alone can enhance antitumor immunity [20 -22]. In addition, metformin synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitors, as shown in clinical and preclinical studies [20, 21, 29]. However, the exact molecular mechanism of metformin-mediated antitumor immunity remains unclear.

We demonstrated that metformin downregulated the transcriptional expression of PD-L1 via inhibition of the AKT/β-catenin axis in cancer cells and inhibited tumor-derived soluble factor-mediated promotion of PD-1 stability by enhancing the association of PD-1 with E3 ligases and PD-1 polyubiquitylation in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes. These inhibitory effects of metformin on both PD-L1 and PD-1 expression are AMPK activation-dependent (Fig. 5). Our findings provide a deeper understanding of the antitumor-responsive roles of metformin within the TME, along with new regulatory mechanisms.

Consistent with previous reports showing high PD-1 expression on tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes in many human TME types [8 -10], our study showed robust PD-1 expression on the surfaces of tumor-infiltrating NK and CD8⁺ T cells in the B16F10 tumor model. Numerous studies have shown that various signaling pathways and transcription factors are involved in the induction of PD-1 transcription in several immune cell types [30 -33]. T-cell receptor (TCR) activation can induce PDCD1 transcription via NFATc1 activation in CD8⁺ T lymphocytes [30]. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-6 signals promote PD-1 transcription by activating the STAT3/STAT4 pathway upon TCR activation [31]. Interferon-α per se or synergistically with TCR can upregulate PD-1 expression by activating JAK/STAT signaling [32, 33]. Recent studies have shown that PD-1 can be regulated at the post-translational level; PD-1 undergoes ubiquitination by E3 ubiquitin ligases, including FBXO38 [26], c-Cbl [27] and KLHL22 [28], followed by proteasomal degradation. The present study revealed that PD-1 expression is upregulated at the post-translational level, not the transcriptional level, upon interaction with a tumor. Many types of cells and soluble factors within the TME can induce the dysfunction of antitumor immune-responsive cells to provide an immunosuppressive environment, resulting in tumor immune escape. Small molecules such as cytokines (e.g., IL-6 and IL-10), growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta), and metabolites (e.g., lactic acid) secreted by cancer cells are involved in the process [25, 34]. We found that tumor-derived soluble factors induce the dissociation of PD-1 from all types of ubiquitin E3 ligases, resulting in reduced PD-1 polyubiquitylation and enhanced PD-1 protein stability. However, the comprehensive mechanisms underlying tumor-derived soluble factor-induced dissociation of PD-1 from E3 ligases and types of tumor-derived soluble factors responsible for PD-1 stability mediated by the mechanism remain to be explored.

The PD-L1/PD-1 pathway, as an important immune checkpoint signaling pathway, can inhibit the activation of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes and enhance the immune tolerance of cancer cells, thereby achieving tumor immune evasion [3]. Metformin can reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment to shift from a protumoral state toward a more antitumoral state. We and others have shown that metformin can inhibit PD-L1 expression at the transcriptional and post-translational levels in many cancer cell types [20 -22]. Metformin plays a key role in maintaining the high multifunctional capacity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, including the infiltration and activation of CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in tumor tissues [35, 36]. Moreover, metformin can enhance both the number and activity of peripheral NK cells, as well as tumor infiltration, thereby benefiting patients with cancer from NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity [37]. The present study revealed that metformin suppresses tumor-derived soluble factor-induced PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes. Collectively, previous and our current findings imply that metformin may exert an antitumor immune effect in part by downregulating both PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in the TME.

In summary, our findings revealed that metformin decreases AKT-mediated β-catenin S552 phosphorylation and subsequent β-catenin transactivation to inhibit the transcriptional expression of PD-L1 in human cancer cells. We demonstrated for the first time that metformin decreases PD-1 protein stability in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes by blocking the tumor-induced reduction in the binding of PD-1 to E3 ligases and PD-1 polyubiquitylation. Our findings suggest that metformin blocks both PD-L1 and PD-1 within the TME to exert an antitumor-immune effect, expanding our understanding of the detailed antitumor-responsive roles of metformin and revealing new regulatory mechanisms. Therefore, metformin can be used in combination therapy to improve the response rate in immunotherapy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

None.

Notes

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0443

alm-44-5-426-supple.pdf

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kim SH and Lee JH designed the study. Park SH, Lee J, and Yun HJ performed the experiments. Park SH, Lee J, Yun HJ, Kim SH, and Lee JH analyzed the data. Park SH, Lee J, Kim SH, and Lee JH drafted the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

RESEARCH FUNDING

This work was supported by a Dong-A University research fund.

References

1. Boussiotis VA. 2016; Molecular and biochemical aspects of the PD-1 checkpoint pathway. N Engl J Med. 375:1767–78. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1514296. PMID: 27806234. PMCID: PMC5575761.

2. Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, Ribas A. 2017; Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell. 168:707–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017. PMID: 28187290. PMCID: PMC5391692.

3. Jiang X, Wang J, Deng X, Xiong F, Ge J, Xiang B, et al. 2019; Role of the tumor microenvironment in PD-L1/PD-1-mediated tumor immune escape. Mol Cancer. 18:10. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-018-0928-4. PMID: 30646912. PMCID: PMC6332843. PMID: 70238db4d68c4e4bb58930633279c9c3.

4. Du L, Lee JH, Jiang H, Wang C, Wang S, Zheng Z, et al. 2020; β-Catenin induces transcriptional expression of PD-L1 to promote glioblastoma immune evasion. J Exp Med. 217:e20191115. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20191115. PMID: 32860047. PMCID: PMC7596815.

5. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Iwasaki M, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. 2007; Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are prognostic factors of human ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:3360–5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611533104. PMID: 17360651. PMCID: PMC1805580.

6. Thompson RH, Gillett MD, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Dong H, Webster WS, et al. 2004; Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:17174–9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406351101. PMID: 15569934. PMCID: PMC534606.

7. Nusse R, Clevers H. 2017; Wnt/β-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 169:985–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. PMID: 28575679.

8. Ahmadzadeh M, Johnson LA, Heemskerk B, Wunderlich JR, Dudley ME, White DE, et al. 2009; Tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cells infiltrating the tumor express high levels of PD-1 and are functionally impaired. Blood. 114:1537–44. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-195792. PMID: 19423728. PMCID: PMC2927090.

9. Pesce S, Greppi M, Tabellini G, Rampinelli F, Parolini S, Olive D, et al. 2017; Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: a phenotypic and functional characterization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 139:335–46.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.025. PMID: 27372564.

10. Hsu J, Hodgins JJ, Marathe M, Nicolai CJ, Bourgeois-Daigneault MC, Trevino TN, et al. 2018; Contribution of NK cells to immunotherapy mediated by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. J Clin Invest. 128:4654–68. DOI: 10.1172/JCI99317. PMID: 30198904. PMCID: PMC6159991.

11. Muti P, Berrino F, Krogh V, Villarini A, Barba M, Strano S, et al. 2009; Metformin, diet and breast cancer: an avenue for chemoprevention. Cell Cycle. 8:2661. DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.16.9226. PMID: 19571669.

12. Vancura A, Bu P, Bhagwat M, Zeng J, Vancurova I. 2018; Metformin as an anticancer agent. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 39:867–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.07.006. PMID: 30150001. PMCID: PMC6153060.

13. Wink KCJ, Belderbos JSA, Dieleman EMT, Rossi M, Rasch CRN, Damhuis RAM, et al. 2016; Improved progression free survival for patients with diabetes and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using metformin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 118:453–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.012. PMID: 26861738.

14. Saif MW, Rajagopal S, Caplain J, Grimm E, Serebrennikova O, Das M, et al. 2019; A phase I delayed-start, randomized and pharmacodynamic study of metformin and chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 84:1323–31. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03967-3. PMID: 31583436.

15. Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. 2011; Metformin decreases the dose of chemotherapy for prolonging tumor remission in mouse xenografts involving multiple cancer cell types. Cancer Res. 71:3196–201. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3471. PMID: 21415163. PMCID: PMC3085572.

16. Zhang CS, Li M, Ma T, Zong Y, Cui J, Feng JW, et al. 2016; Metformin activates AMPK through the lysosomal pathway. Cell Metab. 24:521–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.003. PMID: 27732831.

17. Dowling RJ, Zakikhani M, Fantus IG, Pollak M, Sonenberg N. 2007; Metformin inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent translation initiation in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 67:10804–12. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2310. PMID: 18006825.

18. Blandino G, Valerio M, Cioce M, Mori F, Casadei L, Pulito C, et al. 2012; Metformin elicits anticancer effects through the sequential modulation of DICER and c-MYC. Nat Commun. 3:865. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1859. PMID: 22643892.

19. Ben Sahra I, Regazzetti C, Robert G, Laurent K, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Auberger P, et al. 2011; Metformin, independent of AMPK, induces mTOR inhibition and cell-cycle arrest through REDD1. Cancer Res. 71:4366–72. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1769. PMID: 21540236.

20. Cha JH, Yang WH, Xia W, Wei Y, Chan LC, Lim SO, et al. 2018; Metformin promotes antitumor immunity via endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation of PD-L1. Mol Cell. 71:606–20.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.030. PMID: 30118680. PMCID: PMC6786495.

21. Lu Y, Xin D, Guan L, Xu M, Yang Y, Chen Y, et al. 2021; Metformin downregulates PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting IL-6 signaling pathway. Front Oncol. 11:762523. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762523. PMID: 34881181. PMCID: PMC8645640. PMID: c861b8c7f13c4c35a4f101a9ac29c246.

22. Zhang JJ, Zhang QS, Li ZQ, Zhou JW, Du J. 2019; Metformin attenuates PD-L1 expression through activating Hippo signaling pathway in colorectal cancer cells. Am J Transl Res. 11:6965–76. PMID: 31814900. PMCID: PMC6895520.

23. Yang W, Xia Y, Ji H, Zheng Y, Liang J, Huang W, et al. 2011; Nuclear PKM2 regulates beta-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature. 480:118–22. DOI: 10.1038/nature10598. PMID: 22056988. PMCID: PMC3235705.

24. Rattan R, Giri S, Singh AK, Singh I. 2005; 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranoside inhibits cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo via AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 280:39582–93. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507443200. PMID: 16176927.

25. Russo V, Protti MP. 2017; Tumor-derived factors affecting immune cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 36:79–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.06.005. PMID: 28606733.

26. Meng X, Liu X, Guo X, Jiang S, Chen T, Hu Z, et al. 2018; FBXO38 mediates PD-1 ubiquitination and regulates anti-tumour immunity of T cells. Nature. 564:130–5. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0756-0. PMID: 30487606.

27. Lyle C, Richards S, Yasuda K, Napoleon MA, Walker J, Arinze N, et al. 2019; c-Cbl targets PD-1 in immune cells for proteasomal degradation and modulates colorectal tumor growth. Sci Rep. 9:20257. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56208-1. PMID: 31882749. PMCID: PMC6934810.

28. Zhou XA, Zhou J, Zhao L, Yu G, Zhan J, Shi C, et al. 2020; KLHL22 maintains PD-1 homeostasis and prevents excessive T cell suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:28239–50. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004570117. PMID: 33109719. PMCID: PMC7668036.

29. Kubo T, Ninomiya T, Hotta K, Kozuki T, Toyooka S, Okada H, et al. 2018; Study protocol: phase-Ib trial of nivolumab combined with metformin for refractory/recurrent solid tumors. Clin Lung Cancer. 19:e861–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.07.010. PMID: 30172698.

30. Oestreich KJ, Yoon H, Ahmed R, Boss JM. 2008; NFATc1 regulates PD-1 expression upon T cell activation. J Immunol. 181:4832–9. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4832. PMID: 18802087. PMCID: PMC2645436.

31. Austin JW, Lu P, Majumder P, Ahmed R, Boss JM. 2014; STAT3, STAT4, NFATc1, and CTCF regulate PD-1 through multiple novel regulatory regions in murine T cells. J Immunol. 192:4876–86. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302750. PMID: 24711622. PMCID: PMC4011967.

32. Cho HY, Lee SW, Seo SK, Choi IW, Choi I, Lee SW. 2008; Interferon-sensitive response element (ISRE) is mainly responsible for IFN-alpha-induced upregulation of programmed death-1 (PD-1) in macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1779:811–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.08.003. PMID: 18771758.

33. Terawaki S, Chikuma S, Shibayama S, Hayashi T, Yoshida T, Okazaki T, et al. 2011; IFN-α directly promotes programmed cell death-1 transcription and limits the duration of T cell-mediated immunity. J Immunol. 186:2772–9. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003208. PMID: 21263073.

34. Tie Y, Tang F, Wei YQ, Wei XW. 2022; Immunosuppressive cells in cancer: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. J Hematol Oncol. 15:61. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01282-8. PMID: 35585567. PMCID: PMC9118588. PMID: 274a447483bf40e79ac6103100cdf0e6.

35. Wang S, Lin Y, Xiong X, Wang L, Guo Y, Chen Y, et al. 2020; Low-dose metformin reprograms the tumor immune microenvironment in human esophageal cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 26:4921–32. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0113. PMID: 32646922.

36. Eikawa S, Nishida M, Mizukami S, Yamazaki C, Nakayama E, Udono H. 2015; Immune-mediated antitumor effect by type 2 diabetes drug, metformin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112:1809–14. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1417636112. PMID: 25624476. PMCID: PMC4330733.

37. Crist M, Yaniv B, Palackdharry S, Lehn MA, Medvedovic M, Stone T, et al. 2022; Metformin increases natural killer cell functions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through CXCL1 inhibition. J Immunother Cancer. 10:e005632. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005632. PMID: 36328378. PMCID: PMC9639146. PMID: d5e39b30e67c484baead80341faf7c76.

Fig. 1

Metformin inhibits both PD-L1 expression on cancer cells and PD-1 expression on infiltrating immune cells in the TME. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures. B16F10 murine melanoma cells were subcutaneously injected into C57BL/6 mice. From day 3 after tumor implantation, the mice received an intraperitoneal injection of metformin or PBS daily. On day 20, after tumor implantation, the mice were sacrificed. (B) Representative images of B16F10 tumors. Scale bar, 1 cm. (C) Growth curve of subcutaneous B16F10 tumors derived from metformin-treated (red line; N=5) and PBS-treated (blue line; N=5) mice. (D) Tumor weight of subcutaneous B16F10 tumors on day 20 derived from metformin-treated (red line; N=5) and PBS-treated (blue line; N=5) mice. (E) Cell-surface analysis of PD-L1 protein expression in B16F10 single-cell suspensions derived from B16F10 tumors using flow cytometry. A representative histogram (left panel) and graph (right panel) are shown. (F) Cell-surface analysis of PD-1 protein expression in NK or CD8⁺ T single-cell suspensions derived from B16F10 tumors using flow cytometry. A representative histogram (left panel) and graph (right panel) are shown. P<0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001, Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; PD-1, programmed death 1; TME, tumor microenvironment; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; NK, natural killer.

Fig. 2

Metformin inhibits transcriptional expression of PD-L1 in an AMPK-downregulated AKT/β-catenin signaling-dependent manner. (A, B) The indicated cells were treated or not with metformin for 12 hrs. Then, mRNA and protein expression levels of PD-L1 were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (A) and immunoblotting (B) with the indicated primers and antibodies, respectively. (C) A431 cells were treated or not with metformin for 12 hrs and subjected to immunoblotting analysis using the indicated antibodies. (D) A431 cells were transfected with TOP-FLASH or FOP-FLASH, followed by metformin (10 mM) treatment for 12 hrs. Luciferase activity was measured. Relative luciferase activity levels were normalized to levels in untreated cells and to Renilla luciferase activity levels. (E–G) A431 cells stably expressing control vector or CA-β-catenin were transfected with TOP-FLASH or FOP-FLASH, followed by metformin (10 mM) treatment for 12 hrs. Luciferase activity was measured. Relative luciferase activity levels were normalized to levels in untreated cells and to Renilla luciferase activity levels (E). mRNA and protein expression levels of PD-L1 were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (F) and immunoblotting (G) with the indicated primers and antibodies, respectively. (H–J) A431 cells stably expressing the control vector or HA-myr-AKT1 were transfected with TOP-FLASH or FOP-FLASH, followed by metformin (10 mM) treatment for 12 hrs. Luciferase activity was measured. Relative levels of luciferase activity were normalized to levels in untreated cells and to Renilla luciferase activity levels (H). The mRNA and protein expression levels of PD-L1 were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (I) and immunoblotting (J) with the indicated primers and antibodies, respectively. (K, L) A431 cells were pretreated or not pretreated with compound C (5 μM) for 1 hr and then treated or not pretreated with metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. Protein and mRNA expression levels of PD-L1 were determined using immunoblotting (K and bottom panel of L) and quantitative real-time PCR (L, top panel) with the indicated antibodies and primers, respectively. Data are presented as mean±SD of three independent experiments (A, D, E, F, H, I, L). P<0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001, Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests.

Abbreviations: PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CA, constitutively active; HA, hemagglutinin.

Fig. 3

Cancer cells enhance PD-1 protein stability in NK and T cells. (A) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated or not treated with CM (50%) for the indicated periods. Protein and mRNA expression levels of PD-1 were determined using immunoblotting (upper panel) and quantitative real-time PCR (bottom panel) with the indicated antibodies and primers, respectively. Data are presented as mean±SD of three independent experiments. (B) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were pretreated with DMSO or CHX (100 μg/mL) for 1 hr and then treated with CM (50%) for 6 hrs. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies. (C) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were pretreated with CM (50%) for 12 hrs and then treated with CHX (100 μg/mL) for the indicated periods. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies (left panel). Quantification of PD-1 levels relative to tubulin levels is shown (right panel). Band intensities were quantified using the ImageJ software. Data are presented as mean±SD of three independent experiments. **P<0.01, Student’s t-test. (D) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated or not treated with CM (50%) for 12 hrs. Immunoprecipitation analyses were performed using an anti-PD-1 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies. (E) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated with CM (50%) for the indicated periods. The cells were incubated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 hrs before they were harvested using a guanidine-HCl-containing buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-PD-1 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies.

Abbreviations: PD-1, programmed death 1; NK, natural killer; CM, conditioned medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; CHX, cycloheximide.

Fig. 4

Metformin inhibits cancer-enhanced PD-1 expression via AMPK-dependent deregulation of PD-1 protein stability. (A) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated or not with CM (50%) or metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies. (B) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were pretreated with DMSO or MG132 (10 μM) for 1 hr and then treated or not with CM (50%) or metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies. (C) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were pretreated or not with CM (50%) or metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs and then treated with CHX (100 μg/mL) for the indicated periods. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies (left panel). Quantification of PD-1 levels relative to tubulin levels is shown (right panel). Band intensity was quantified using the ImageJ software. Data are presented as mean±SD of three independent experiments. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, Student’s t-test. (D) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated or not with CM (50%) and metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-PD-1 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies. (E) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were treated or not with CM (50%) or metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. The cells were incubated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 hrs before they were harvested using a guanidine-HCl-containing buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-PD-1 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies. (F) 293T cells stably expressing V5-PD-1 and Flag-vector or Flag-CA-AMPK were treated or not with CM (50%) for 12 hrs. The cells were incubated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 hrs before they were harvested using a guanidine-HCl-containing buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-V5 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies. (G) AMPK WT and AMPK DKO MEFs were transfected or not with V5-PD-1. These cells were incubated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 hrs before they were harvested using a guanidine-HCl-containing buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-V5 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies. (H) NK-92 and Jurkat cells were pretreated with DMSO or compound C (5 μM) for 1 hr and then treated or not with CM (50%) and metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. Immunoblotting analyses were performed using the indicated antibodies. (I) 293T cells stably expressing V5-PD-1 were pretreated with DMSO or compound C (5 μM) for 1 hr and then treated or not with CM (50%) or metformin (10 mM) for 12 hrs. The cells were incubated with MG132 (10 μM) for 6 hrs before they were harvested using a guanidine-HCl-containing buffer. Immunoprecipitation was performed using an anti-V5 antibody, followed by immunoblotting analyses using the indicated antibodies.

Abbreviations: PD-1, programmed death 1; AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; CM, conditioned medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; CHX, cycloheximide; CA, constitutively active; WT, wild-type; DKO, double knockout.

Fig. 5

Schematic representation of the proposed mechanisms.

TOOLS

Similar articles