Journal List > Ann Lab Med > v.44(5) > 1516087434

Chen, Yu, Chen, Cai, Chen, Zheng, Chen, Zheng, and Guo: Association Between the Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and 30-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Database

Abstract

Background

Millions of patients undergo cardiac surgery each year. The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) could help predict the prognosis of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery. We investigated whether the RDW has robust predictive value for the 30-day mortality among patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) after undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Database, we retrieved data for 11,634 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in an ICU. We performed multivariate Cox regression analysis to model the association between the RDW and 30-day mortality and plotted Kaplan–Meier curves. Subgroup analyses were stratified using relevant covariates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the predictive value of the RDWs.

Results

The total 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% (485/11,502). The elevated-RDW group had a higher 30-day mortality rate than the normal-RDW group (P<0.001). The robustness of our data analysis was confirmed by performing subgroup analyses. Each unit increase in the RDW was associated with a 17% increase in 30-day mortality when the RDW was used as a continuous variable (adjusted hazard ratio=1.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10&#8211;1.25). Our ROC results showed the predictive value of the RDW.

Conclusions

An elevated RDW was associated with a higher 30-day mortality in patients after undergoing cardiac surgery in an ICU setting. The RDW can serve as an efficient and accessible method for predicting the mortality of patients in ICUs following cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION

According to the American Heart Association, millions of patients undergo cardiac surgery yearly [1]. The mortality rate has declined in recent decades owing to advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management. However, even the lowest-risk procedures (such as isolated coronary artery bypass grafts or isolated aortic valve replacements) still have a mortality rate of 2% [2]. Additionally, higher mortality rates are associated with more complex or combined procedures and patients with high risks [3, 4]. Consequently, increasing emphasis has been placed on assessing mortality risks for cardiac surgery.
However, even widely used risk models, such as the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) [5], have their limitations. The EuroSCORE is widely used to predict mortality after cardiac surgery, but its predictive power and reliability are decreasing due to changes in cardiac surgery and outcomes. Among patients who underwent degenerative mitral valve repairs, the EuroSCORE II showed low discrimination, accuracy, and calibration scores because it overpredicted the 30-day mortality [6]. A new risk factor that enables simple and cost-effective clinical use, with improved methods for predicting and preventing mortality following cardiac surgery, should be proposed.
The red blood cell distribution width (RDW), an easily accessible laboratory parameter, is expressed as the ratio between the standard deviation (SD) of the red blood cell (RBC) volume and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV). The RDW can reflect heterogeneity in the RBC size distribution, and an increase in the RDW may imply the presence of various abnormalities, namely, telomere-length shortening, oxidative stress, inflammation, RBC fragmentation, a poor nutritional status, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and abnormal erythropoietin function [7, 8].
Generally, the RDW is primarily used for the differential diagnosis of anemia. According to MCV values, anemia can be classified as microcytic, normocytic, and macrocytic anemia. Combining MCV with RDW values can enable further sub-classification [9]. Recent findings showed that RDW could be used to predict the prognosis for various diseases, such as heart failure [10], acute myocardial infarction (MI) [11], and sepsis [12]. The RDW can also be used to predict the mortality of patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery [13] and percutaneous coronary intervention [14]. However, those studies were limited to coronary artery disease, and whether RDW has similar predictive capacities for other cardiac procedures remains unknown. To our knowledge, this study was the first to assess the prognostic ability of RDW for all populations who underwent cardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the utility of RDW as an early mortality predictor for cardiac surgery using a public database with a large sample size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data source

The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) Database (version 2.0) [15] of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA, was used to enroll patients undergoing cardiac surgery. From 2008 to 2019, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center’s intensive care unit (ICU) treated more than 50,000 adult patients. One author of this study (Weiqiang Chen) obtained full access to the database and extracted the data (certification number 41021697). Our study protocol followed the guidelines for observational studies [16]. As the data were obtained from a publicly available source, the requirement for informed consent was waived.
Patients (age >18 yrs) undergoing cardiac surgery based on International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes (Supplemental Data Table S1) from the MIMIC-IV Database (version 2.0) were included. Patients without RDW records during hospitalization were excluded. We used the date of the first ICU admission for patients admitted to an ICU at least once [17].

Variates

According to existing literature and clinical judgment, we incorporated the following ICU variables, which are considered confounders of cardiac surgery outcomes.
Demographic information: age, sex, and body–mass index (BMI).
Comorbidities: MI, congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), chronic pulmonary disease (CPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), renal disease, and liver disease. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and severity at admission were measured using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.
Vital signs: heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) at the time of ICU admission.
Laboratory results: hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose, potassium, lactate, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2): fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, and base excess (BE).
Prognostic information: acute kidney injury (AKI), sepsis, the lengths of stay in a hospital and ICU.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality, measured from the day of admission to an ICU. Secondary outcomes were the lengths of stay in a hospital and ICU.

Statistical analysis

We found that <30% of covariates had missing data. We used multiple imputations to impute the missing values for the covariates. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to test for normality in the quantitative data. Normally distributed, continuous data were presented as the mean (SD) and compared using Student’s t-test. Non-normally distributed data were presented as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables, and differences were presented as percentages (%). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted to evaluate the 30-day survival probabilities. To determine whether the elevated-RDW group was significantly different from the normal-RDW group, we applied the log-rank test (RDW <14.5 and ≥14.5) [18].
Additionally, to determine whether the RDW was independently associated with the 30-day mortality rate, we constructed five different multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Model 1 was only adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Model 2 was adjusted for additional comorbidities, such as MI, CHF, CVD, CPD, DM, and renal disease. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for the CCI, SAPS II, and SOFA scores. Model 4 was additionally adjusted for the heart rate, MAP, RR, and SpO2. Model 5 was additionally adjusted for Hb, WBC, and platelet counts; BUN, creatinine, glucose, and potassium lactate levels; the PaO2: FiO2 ratio; and BE.
We conducted a sensitivity analysis to ensure that our analysis was robust. To identify modifications and interactions, subgroup analyses were applied based on sex (male or female), age (<70 or ≥70 yrs), sepsis (yes or no), AKI (yes or no), CHF (yes or no), CVD (yes or no), CPD (yes or no), DM (yes or no), or renal disease (yes or no). To reduce publication bias, we also conducted sensitivity analysis after excluding patients with missing data. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) method was used to explore the relationship between the RDW and 30-day mortality of patients after undergoing cardiac surgery. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for RDW to assess the ability to predict the 30-day mortality. We determined the area under the curve (AUC) to test whether the predictive power of existing systems could be improved by incorporating the RDW. We also tested the robustness of the results by using RDW as a categorical variable. The lengths of hospital and ICU stays were also analyzed using multivariate linear regression. We used Free Statistics software (version 1.7; Beijing Free Clinical Medical Technology Co.) and R software (version 4.1.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org) in the RStudio environment for statistical analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant when P was <0.05.

RESULTS

Basic characteristics of the study population

In total, 11,634 patients were identified based on ICD codes recorded in the MIMIC-IV Database (version 2.0). Of these, 132 patients without RDW values or who died on the first day in the ICU were excluded, leaving 11,502 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the final cohort (Fig. 1).
According to Table 1, all patients enrolled had the following basic demographic characteristics. Approximately 67.7% of the patients were men. The average age of all patients was 68.8 (12.6). The 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% (485/11,502), and the lengths of their hospital and ICU stays were 6.8 (4.8, 10.0) and 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) days, respectively. Based on these criteria [15], the patients were divided into a normal-RDW group and an elevated-RDW group. The elevated-RDW group had a higher age; higher heart and respiratory rates; an elevated platelet count; higher BUN, creatinine, glucose, and lactate levels; and higher CCI, SAPS II, and SOFA scores. Patients in the normal-RDW group had higher Hb, MAP, PaO2: FiO2, and GCS values; were more likely to have MI, CHF, CVD, CPD, diabetes, AKI, and sepsis; and a lower mortality rate than those in the elevated-RDW group (Table 1, P<0.001).

Association between RDW and 30-day mortality

The Kaplan–Meier survival curves (Fig. 2) show that the elevated-RDW group had a lower 30-day survival probability than that in the normal-RDW group (P<0.001), suggesting that the elevated-RDW group had a higher 30-day mortality rate. Table 2 shows hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In all five models, the HRs were robust between the unadjusted and adjusted models (P<0.05). The unadjusted model showed a 19% increase in the 30-day mortality for every unit difference of RDW (HR=1.19, 95% CI, 1.17–1.21). Increasing the RDW by one unit increased the 30-day mortality difference by 17% in the minimally adjusted model (Model 1; HR=1.17, 95% CI, 1.16–1.19). With Model 5, as the RDW increased by one unit, the 30-day mortality increased by 12% (HR=1.12, 95% CI, 1.10–1.14). Overall, the statistical results showed that the RDW was independently associated with the 30-day mortality rate and that this association was robust with all models tested.
Further sensitivity analysis was conducted by dividing the continuous variable, RDW, into two subgroups and comparing the results against those of the normal-RDW group as a reference baseline. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in the elevated-RDW group than in the normal-RDW group (HR=1.79, 95% CI, 1.64–1.96). Missing covariate values were imputed with multiple imputation. Supplemental Data Table S2 shows that the RDW was independently associated with 30-day mortality.
A Cox regression model (adjusted for all confounders mentioned above and the RDW) was developed to predict the 30-day mortality. The survival probability was calculated using the regression model based on the grouping criteria (RDW <14.5 or ≥14.5). A significant difference in survival probabilities was observed between both groups (P<0.001, Supplemental Data Table S3).

Subgroup analysis of RDW and other factors

Subgroup analyses were performed to examine whether the association between the RDW and the 30-day mortality was stable among the distinct subgroups (Fig. 3). No significant interaction was identified between the RDW and sex, sepsis, AKI, CHF, CVD, CPD, DM, renal disease, sepsis, or the SOFA score (interaction P all >0.05). However, a significant interaction was observed between RDW and age (P<0.05).

Association between the RDW and clinical outcomes

The RCS method revealed a linear correlation between the RDW and 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery (Supplemental Data Fig. S1). The ROC was calculated to further show the predictive power of the RDW (Supplemental Data Fig. S2). The results in Supplemental Data Fig. S3 suggest that the AUC increased significantly when the RDW was combined with the SOFA score or SAPS II. The AUC increased when the RDW was treated as a categorical variable (Supplemental Data Table S4).

Associations between the RDW and the lengths of hospital and ICU stays

When considering RDW as a continuous variable, each unit increase in the RDW correlated with an increased stay of 0.32 days in a hospital or an increase of 0.08 days in an ICU (Supplemental Data Table S5).

DISCUSSION

We examined the relationship between the RDW and the 30-day mortality rate by conducting a population-based analysis with adjusted variables. An elevated RDW was associated with a higher 30-day mortality. Additionally, the RDW was positively associated with 30-day mortality in patients after cardiac surgery in an ICU setting. The predictive power of existing scoring systems could be improved by incorporating the RDW. An elevated RDW was linked to a longer hospital stay and more days in an ICU.
Used for the differential diagnosis of anemia, an elevated RDW has been associated with ineffective RBC production (e.g., iron deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 and folic acid deficiency, bone marrow suppression, and hemoglobinopathies), increased RBC destruction (e.g., hemolysis), or blood transfusion. Recent reports showed that the RDW may be useful for predicting the prognoses of various diseases. For example, an elevated RDW correlated significantly with a poor prognosis for people with atrial fibrillation [19], severe heart failure, acute heart attacks, septic shock [20], spontaneous cerebral hemorrhaging [21], and hepatocellular carcinoma [22].
The underlying mechanism linking an elevated RDW with mortality remains unclear. One possible mechanism is related to inflammation [23]. Inflammation can impair bone marrow function, resulting in poor efficiency in terms of RBC production, and affect the RBC membrane permeability, which causes reticulocytes to enter the peripheral blood circulation, increases the proportion of immature RBCs, and increases the RDW [24]. Elevated RDW levels are associated with elevated inflammatory-cytokine levels, which usually result in organ dysfunction and complications [25, 26]. The RDW is linked to mortality because it increases oxidative stress, which reduces RBC survival and increases circulating premature RBCs, thereby leading to anisocytosis [27, 28]. Additionally, the RDW increases during malnutrition [29]. These factors may represent pathophysiological mechanisms that explain the association between RDW and mortality. RDW can be used to predict mortality.
The 30-day mortality rate following cardiac surgery was 4.2%, which was 2.1% higher than that reported previously [30]. The elevated rate may be attributed to the higher percentage of patients in this study undergoing cardiac surgery and hybrid operations with higher risks.
Many findings have shown that age; BMI; residual, lactate, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels; and complications such as CHF, the SOFA score, and other risk factors can significantly impact mortality in patients after cardiac surgery [31-34]. These factors were well controlled preoperatively in this study. We performed multivariate Cox regression and sensitivity analyses to enhance the robustness and reliability of our results.
Our results revealed that abnormally elevated RDW levels are independent predictors of the 30-day mortality rate. Combining the RDW with risk-scoring tools, such as the SOFA score and SAPS II, significantly improved the diagnostic performance. Therefore, mortality in patients admitted to an ICU after cardiac surgery may be predicted based on their RDW values.
This is the first report describing an independent correlation between the RDW and 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in an ICU. Our results could promote the development of diagnostic or predictive models for patients after cardiac surgery.
This study has several strengths. First, our analysis was based on real-world data collected from a diverse group of people. Second, strict statistical adjustments were utilized in this retrospective observational study. Potential residual confounders were minimized using multivariate Cox regression. Third, we considered the targeted independent variables separately as categorical and continuous variables. This approach reduced random errors in statistical analysis and enhanced the robustness of our conclusions. Finally, we evaluated the predictive value of the RDW and assessed whether incorporating it could improve the predictive power of existing scoring systems, such as the SOFA score and the SAPS II, by evaluating the AUC.
This study also has several limitations. First, this was a single-center study. Another study is needed to determine whether these findings apply to other hospitals or patients in other countries. Second, nutrition information may impact the predictive value of the RDW. We did not adjust for some unknown confounders, such as iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 levels, and other nutritional information. In addition, the MIMIC-IV Database may have incomplete data for many patients, and other confounding factors (including inflammatory biomarkers, bilirubin levels, underlying disease, the severity of underlying disease, and surgical information such as the transfusion history, bleeding, operation duration, reoperation, and causes of infection) were not collected and analyzed; thus, the current results should be confirmed with a prospective cohort. Third, the predictive performance of the RDW was evaluated in this study without comparison with the EuroSCORE because of missing data in the MIMIC-IV Database. During this study, the baseline RDW was examined at the time of ICU admission, but subsequent changes to the RDW were not included in the dynamic analysis. As with all retrospective analyses, the lack of some necessary data resulted in the exclusion of some patients who underwent cardiac surgery from our study, which may have influenced the results. However, we applied multiple imputation to the entire cohort, followed by multivariate Cox regression, and the results were robust. This was a retrospective study of MIMIC-IV data, making it a post-hoc analysis. Evidences were insufficient to validate the association between the RDW and the 30-day mortality in ICU patients, and more high-quality prospective studies are needed in the future.
In conclusion, our findings indicate that an increase in the RDW is associated with higher 30-day mortality in ICU patients after cardiac surgery and that the RDW can be an efficient predictor. As a risk factor for a poor prognosis, the RDW is a simple and cost-effective laboratory test that can enable early postoperative screening. A high RDW value was associated with a poor prognosis, and the RDW could be an important criterion for early and aggressive intervention and better individualized patient management. Consequently, the RDW might be clinically significant and could become widely used in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the MIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology, MA, USA and collaborating research groups for help in accessing the MIMIC-IV Database.

Notes

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0345

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Zheng L and Guo C conceived the study. Chen W and Yu P curated the data. Yu P and Cai S analyzed the data. Chen W, Zheng C, and Zheng L developed the methods used in the study. Zhen L and Guo C were responsible for project administration. Chen W, Cai S, and Guo C acquired resources for the project. Zheng C developed software. Chen Chao and Chen Chaojin supervised the project. Chen Chao and Chen J validated the findings. Chen W, Chen Chao, and Chen J drafted the original manuscript. Yu P and Chen Chaojin reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

RESEARCH FUNDING

None declared.

References

1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, et al. Writing Group Members. 2016; Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 133:e38–360. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. PMID: 26673558.
2. Landoni G, Lomivorotov V, Silvetti S, Nigro Neto C, Pisano A, Alvaro G, et al. 2018; Nonsurgical strategies to reduce mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an updated consensus process. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 32:225–35. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.06.017. PMID: 29122431.
crossref
3. Lazam S, Vanoverschelde JL, Tribouilloy C, Grigioni F, Suri RM, Avierinos JF, et al. 2017; Twenty-year outcome after mitral repair versus replacement for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation: analysis of a large, prospective, multicenter, international registry. Circulation. 135:410–22. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023340. PMID: 27899396.
crossref
4. Pieri M, Belletti A, Monaco F, Pisano A, Musu M, Dalessandro V, et al. 2016; Outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with low preoperative ejection fraction. BMC Anesthesiol. 16:97. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0271-5. PMID: 27760527. PMCID: PMC5069974.
crossref
5. Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, et al. 2012; EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 41:734–45. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs043. PMID: 22378855.
crossref
6. Carino D, Denti P, Ascione G, Del Forno B, Lapenna E, Ruggeri S, et al. 2021; Is the EuroSCORE II reliable in surgical mitral valve repair? A single-centre validation study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 59:863–8. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa403. PMID: 33313790.
crossref
7. Pinna A, Carlino P, Serra R, Boscia F, Dore S, Carru C, et al. 2021; Red cell distribution width (RDW) and complete blood cell count-derived measures in non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Int J Med Sci. 18:2239–44. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.53668. PMID: 33859533. PMCID: PMC8040420.
crossref
8. Qi X, Dong Y, Lin X, Xin W. 2021; Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell distribution width in evaluating the prognosis of children with severe pneumonia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021:1818469. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1818469. PMID: 34603463. PMCID: PMC8486541.
crossref
9. Salvagno GL, Sanchis-Gomar F, Picanza A, Lippi G. 2015; Red blood cell distribution width: a simple parameter with multiple clinical applications. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 52:86–105. DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2014.992064. PMID: 25535770.
crossref
10. Xanthopoulos A, Giamouzis G, Dimos A, Skoularigki E, Starling RC, Skoularigis J, et al. 2022; Red blood cell distribution width in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognostic role, controversies and dilemmas. J Clin Med. 11:1951. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071951. PMID: 35407558. PMCID: PMC8999162. PMID: f95e06d778b84d5cac31e74e6900cfe5.
crossref
11. Huang S, Zhou Q, Guo N, Zhang Z, Luo L, Luo Y, et al. 2021; Association between red blood cell distribution width and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Medicine. 100:e25404. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025404. PMID: 33847638. PMCID: PMC8052072.
crossref
12. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. 2016; The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 315:801–10. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PMID: 26903338. PMCID: PMC4968574.
crossref
13. Warwick R, Mediratta N, Shaw M, McShane J, Pullan M, Chalmers J, et al. 2013; Red cell distribution width and coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 43:1165–9. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs609. PMID: 23277431.
crossref
14. Frentiu AA, Mao K, Caruana CB, Raveendran D, Perry LA, Penny-Dimri JC, et al. 2023; The prognostic significance of red cell distribution width in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 37:471–9. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.11.015. PMID: 36635145.
crossref
15. Johnson AEW, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, Gayles A, Shammout A, Horng S, et al. 2023; MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data. 10:1. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x. PMID: 36596836. PMCID: PMC9810617. PMID: 87ad030cf80044449c8297af0def7c70.
crossref
16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. 2007; Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 335:806–8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. PMID: 17947786. PMCID: PMC2034723.
crossref
17. Yang Q, Zheng J, Chen W, Chen X, Wen D, Chen W, et al. 2021; Association between preadmission metformin use and outcomes in intensive care unit patients with sepsis and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 8:640785. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.640785. PMID: 33855034. PMCID: PMC8039324. PMID: 6e49fd9b118647e8b4a0e46370772e7e.
crossref
18. Otero TM, Canales C, Yeh DD, Hou PC, Belcher DM, Quraishi SA. 2016; Elevated red cell distribution width at initiation of critical care is associated with mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 34:7–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.03.005. PMID: 27288601. PMCID: PMC4903153.
crossref
19. Shao Q, Korantzopoulos P, Letsas KP, Tse G, Hong J, Li G, et al. 2018; Red blood cell distribution width as a predictor of atrial fibrillation. J Clin Lab Anal. 32:e22378. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22378. PMID: 29315856. PMCID: PMC6817116.
crossref
20. Ling J, Liao T, Wu Y, Wang Z, Jin H, Lu F, et al. 2021; Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width in septic shock patients with thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study using machine learning. J Clin Lab Anal. 35:e24053. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24053. PMID: 34674393. PMCID: PMC8649348.
crossref
21. Pinho J, Silva L, Quintas-Neves M, Marques L, Amorim JM, Reich A, et al. 2021; Red cell distribution width is associated with 30-day mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 34:825–32. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-01103-1. PMID: 32959199. PMCID: PMC8179905.
crossref
22. Smirne C, Grossi G, Pinato DJ, Burlone ME, Mauri FA, Januszewski A, et al. 2015; Evaluation of the red cell distribution width as a biomarker of early mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 47:488–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.03.011. PMID: 25864774.
crossref
23. Drakopoulou M, Toutouzas K, Stefanadi E, Tsiamis E, Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. 2009; Association of inflammatory markers with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 206:335–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.01.041. PMID: 19264307.
crossref
24. Arbel Y, Birati EY, Finkelstein A, Halkin A, Berliner S, Katz BZ, et al. 2014; Red blood cell distribution width and 3-year outcome in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 37:469–74. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-0964-2. PMID: 23836454.
crossref
25. Maluf CB, Barreto SM, Giatti L, Ribeiro AL, Vidigal PG, Azevedo DRM, et al. 2020; Association between C reactive protein and all-cause mortality in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 74:421–7. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213289. PMID: 32102838. PMCID: PMC7307658.
crossref
26. Lindmark E, Diderholm E, Wallentin L, Siegbahn A. 2001; Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. JAMA. 286:2107–13. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.17.2107. PMID: 11694151.
crossref
27. Fibach E, Rachmilewitz E. 2008; The role of oxidative stress in hemolytic anemia. Curr Mol Med. 8:609–19. DOI: 10.2174/156652408786241384. PMID: 18991647.
crossref
28. Ghaffari S. 2008; Oxidative stress in the regulation of normal and neoplastic hematopoiesis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 10:1923–40. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2008.2142. PMID: 18707226. PMCID: PMC2932538.
crossref
29. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. 2021; ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 40:4745–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031. PMID: 34242915.
crossref
30. Devereaux PJ, Lamy A, Chan MTV, Allard RV, Lomivorotov VV, Landoni G, et al. 2022; High-sensitivity troponin I after cardiac surgery and 30-day mortality. N Engl J Med. 386:827–36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000803. PMID: 35235725.
crossref
31. Liu X, Xie L, Zhu W, Zhou Y. 2020; Association of body mass index and all-cause mortality in patients after cardiac surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis. Nutrition. 72:110696. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110696. PMID: 32007807.
crossref
32. Zante B, Reichenspurner H, Kubik M, Kluge S, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. 2018; Base excess is superior to lactate-levels in prediction of ICU mortality after cardiac surgery. PLoS One. 13:e0205309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205309. PMID: 30289956. PMCID: PMC6173442. PMID: ee629989b9aa4ab397e6409916e20812.
crossref
33. Bouma HR, Mungroop HE, Scheeren TWL, Epema AH. 2021; Very early creatinine changes and 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 38:665. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001436. PMID: 33967257.
crossref
34. Yu Y, Peng C, Zhang Z, Shen K, Zhang Y, Xiao J, et al. 2022; Machine learning methods for predicting long-term mortality in patients after cardiac surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 9:831390. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.831390. PMID: 35592400. PMCID: PMC9110683. PMID: ce2a375dab0f43a681805eb2e558676f.
crossref

Fig. 1

Study flow chart showing the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; MIMIC-IV, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV; RDW, red blood cell distribution width.
alm-44-5-401-f1.tif
Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier curves showing the association between the red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and the 30-day mortality of patients after undergoing cardiac surgery.

alm-44-5-401-f2.tif
Fig. 3

Forest plot showing subgroup analysis of the association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and 30-day mortality.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Sepsis 3.0, the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; AKI, acute kidney injury; MI, myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; CPD, chronic pulmonary disease; DM, diabetes mellitus.
alm-44-5-401-f3.tif
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study participants and their outcome parameters

Variables Total (N=11,502) Normal-RDW group (N=8,209) Elevated-RDW group (N=3,293) P
Age (yrs) 68.8±12.6 67.7±12.2 71.6±12.9 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 29.7±6.2 29.6±5.8 30.1±7.0 <0.001
Male, N (%) 7,782 (67.7) 5,838 (71.1) 1944 (59) <0.001
MI, N (%) 4,001 (34.8) 2,792 (34) 1,209 (36.7) 0.006
CHF, N (%) 3,936 (34.2) 2,165 (26.4) 1,771 (53.8) <0.001
CVD, N (%) 1,168 (10.2) 733 (8.9) 435 (13.2) <0.001
CPD, N (%) 2,619 (22.8) 1,548 (18.9) 1,071 (32.5) <0.001
DM, N (%) 1,108 (9.6) 655 (8) 453 (13.8) <0.001
Renal disease, N (%) 2,161 (18.8) 1,047 (12.8) 1,114 (33.8) <0.001
Liver disease, N (%) 72 (0.6) 15 (0.2) 57 (1.7) <0.001
Sepsis, N (%) 5,640 (49.0) 3,900 (47.5) 1,740 (52.8) <0.001
AKI, N (%) 6,150 (53.5) 4,153 (50.6) 1,997 (60.6) <0.001
Mortality, N (%) 485 (4.2) 197 (2.4) 288 (8.7) <0.001
HR (bpm) 96.8±16.8 96.5±16.0 97.8±18.5 <0.001
MAP (mmHg) 57.7±10.5 58.4±10.1 56.0±11.0 <0.001
RR (bpm) 26.9±5.7 26.8±5.6 27.4±5.9 <0.001
SpO2 (%) 92.4±5.2 92.6±5.1 92.0±5.4 <0.001
Hb (g/L) 98±20 101±20 92±19 <0.001
PLT (×109/L) 159.6±72.4 156.1±64.9 168.4±87.8 <0.001
K (mmol/L) 4.6±0.6 4.6±0.6 4.7±0.7 <0.001
P/F (mmHg) 210.5±95.3 213.4±92.8 201.9±101.8 <0.001
GLU (mg/dL) 144.3±69.1 140.7±62.5 153.2±82.6 <0.001
WBCs (×109/L) 14.0 (10.6, 18.2) 14.2 (10.9, 18.2) 13.3 (9.7, 18.1) <0.001
BUN (mg/dL) 18.0 (14.0, 25.0) 17.0 (14.0, 22.0) 23.0 (17.0, 34.5) <0.001
CR (mg/dL) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 0.9 (0.8, 1.2) 1.2 (0.9, 1.7) <0.001
LAC (mmol/L) 2.5 (1.9, 3.4) 2.4 (1.9, 3.2) 2.6 (1.9, 3.8) <0.001
BE (mmol/L) −3.0 (−5.0, −1.0) −3.0 (−5.0, −1.0) −3.0 (−6.0, −1.0) <0.001
SOFA score 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) <0.001
SAPS II 35.9±12.4 34.6±12.0 39.3±12.8 <0.001
CCI 5.4±2.4 5.0±2.1 6.7±2.5 <0.001
GCS 13.0±3.6 13.2±3.5 12.7±3.8 <0.001
Los in hospital (days) 6.8 (4.8, 10.0) 6.2 (4.6, 9.1) 8.2 (5.4, 13.0) <0.001
Los in ICU (days) 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) 1.6 (1.2, 3.0) 2.3 (1.3, 4.2) <0.001

Data were presented as mean±SD or median (first quartile, third quartile) based on their distribution.

Abbreviations: RDW, red blood cell distribution width; BMI, body–mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; CPD, chronic pulmonary disease; DM, diabetes mellitus (with complications); CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats/min; MAP, mean artery pressure; RR, respiratory rate; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CR, creatinine; GLU, glucose; K, potassium; LAC, lactate; P/F, partial pressure of oxygen: fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; BE, base excess; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; AKI, acute kidney injury; Los, length of stay; ICU, Intensive care unit.

Table 2

Multivariate Cox regression to assess the association between the RDW and 30-day mortality

Variables Normal RDW Elevated RDW RDW
HR HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Unadjusted 1 2.32 (2.14–2.52) <0.001 1.19 (1.17–1.21) <0.001
Model 1* 1 2.20 (2.02–2.39) <0.001 1.17 (1.16–1.19) <0.001
Model 2 1 2.00 (1.83–2.18) <0.001 1.16 (1.14–1.18) <0.001
Model 3 1 1.83 (1.68–2.00) <0.001 1.13 (1.11–1.15) <0.001
Model 4§ 1 1.84 (1.69–2.01) <0.001 1.13 (1.11–1.15) <0.001
Model 5ІІ 1 1.79 (1.64–1.96) <0.001 1.12 (1.10–1.14) <0.001

*Models 1–5 were derived from multivariate Cox regression models. Model 1 covariates were adjusted for sex, age, and body–mass index (BMI).

Model 2 covariates were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes with complications, and renal disease.

Model 3 covariates were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes with complications, renal disease, Charlson comorbidity index, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II.

§Model 4 covariates were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes with complications, renal disease, Charlson comorbidity index, SOFA score, SAPS II, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2).

ІІModel 5 covariates were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes with complications, renal disease, Charlson comorbidity index, SOFA score, SAPS II, heart rate, MAP, respiratory rate, SpO2, hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cells, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, potassium, lactate, partial pressure of oxygen: fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, Glasgow Coma Scale, and base excess.

Abbreviations: RDW, red blood cell distribution width; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

TOOLS
Similar articles