Journal List > Anesth Pain Med > v.19(2) > 1516087035

Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, and Kim: Association between preoperative lumbar skeletal muscle index and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative complications; however, its impact on the quality of postoperative recovery, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain, remains unclear. We investigated the association of preoperative lumbar skeletal muscle mass index (LSMI) with PONV, postoperative pain, and complications.

Methods

Medical records of 756 patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) were retrospectively reviewed. The skeletal muscle areas were measured on abdominal computed tomography (CT) images. LSMI was calculated by dividing the skeletal muscle area by the square of the patient’s height. We analyzed the correlations between preoperative LSMI calibrated with confounding variables and PONV scores, PONV occurrence, pain scores, rescue analgesic administration, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.

Results

The median (1Q, 3Q) LSMI was 47.72 (40.74, 53.41) cm2/m2. The incidence rates of PONV according to time period were as follows: post-anesthesia care unit, 42/756 (5.6%); 0–6 h, 54/756 (7.1%); 6–24 h, 120/756 (15.9%); 24–48 h, 46/756 (6.1%); and overall, 234/756 (31.0%). The incidence of PONV was inversely correlated with LSMI 24–48 h post-surgery and overall. LSMI and PONV scores were negatively associated 6–24 h and 24–48 h post-surgery. There was no association between LSMI and postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesic administration, complications, or length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Preoperative LSMI was associated with PONV in patients undergoing PPPD. Therefore, LSMI measured on preoperative abdominal CT can be a predictive indicator of PONV. Appropriate PONV prophylaxis is necessary in patients with low LSMI before PPPD.

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia consists of loss of appendicular muscle mass, decline in muscle strength, and loss of physical performance, which are associated with increased mortality and decreased quality of life [1]. It has emerged as an important public health concern, especially among the older adult population [2,3]. Sarcopenia is associated with various comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and liver disease [4,5]. Skeletal muscle mass can be measured in various ways; however, skeletal muscle mass measured through computed tomography (CT) is likely correlated with muscle strength and physical function [6,7].
Skeletal muscle mass and strength affect the prognosis of patients after surgery. Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with extended hospital stay, post-surgical complications, and increased mortality after colorectal cancer surgery [8]. In cardiac surgery, low muscle mass increases stay in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), and the rate of postoperative complications [9,10]. In patients undergoing liver transplantation, high muscle mass is associated with early tracheal extubation and a short mechanical ventilation period [11], and a rapid decrease in muscle mass before and after surgery is associated with the patient survival rates [12]. Therefore, preoperative screening for preoperative sarcopenia will significantly improve prognostic predictions after surgery.
The recently published Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for pancreatoduodenectomy underscores postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis and adequate pain control to improve patient outcomes [13]. Therefore, predicting which patients are at high risk of developing PONV and severe pain would help improve recovery. Whereas the association between sarcopenia and nausea has been demonstrated in cancer patients [14-16], no studies have investigated the effects of preoperative sarcopenia on the development of PONV. If preoperative sarcopenia affects patient recovery after surgery, postoperative recovery can be improved by screening high-risk patients and providing appropriate treatment in advance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative skeletal muscle mass and PONV, postoperative pain, and postoperative complication rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea (#4-2020-0964), and the requirement for patient consent was waived as this was a retrospective study with minimal risk. We included patients aged 19 years or older who received pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) under general anesthesia from September 2010 to July 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital. At this Hospital, specialized patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) management teams record postoperative pain, side effects, and PCA effects in every patient who receives postoperative PCA. These data and other electronic medical records were retrieved for this study. Patients with incomplete medical records or without preoperative abdominal CT images were excluded.
The skeletal muscle area (cm2) was measured, including the psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, transverse abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and rectus abdominis, at the L3 level using abdominal CT images (Centricity Web PACS Viewer, version 3.0, GE Medical Systems). Lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI) was calculated by dividing the skeletal muscle area by the square of the patient’s height (m). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of PONV on two postoperative days. The nausea and vomiting scores were defined as follows: 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild nausea; 2 = moderate nausea; 3 = severe nausea with or without vomiting; and 4 = extreme nausea and vomiting. The postoperative period was divided into the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative 0–6 h, 6–24 h, 24–48 h, and overall (0–48 h) periods to determine whether PONV occurred. Secondary outcomes included the highest numeric pain rating scale (NRS) by time period, number of rescue analgesic administrations, PCA duration after surgery, duration of hospital stay after surgery, PCA-related side effects (dizziness, headache, and sedation), postoperative complications during hospitalization (wound infection, wound dehiscence, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, cardiac complications, pneumonia, acute kidney injury, and delirium), ICU admission, all-cause reoperation, and all-cause mortality 1 year after surgery.
We also collected data on potential confounding variables that may affect postoperative PONV, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, kidney disease, history of abdominal surgery, preoperative chemotherapy, smoking, history of motion weakness, Apfel score for PONV [17], maintenance anesthetic agent (inhalation or total intravenous), anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and type of PCA (intravenous or epidural). Variables were included in the multivariate model if they showed statistical significance in the univariate regression analysis.
A linear regression model was fitted to the PONV score according to the time period, and logistic regression models were used to determine whether PONV occurred in each time interval or in the overall time period. The Poisson regression model was used to estimate the relative risks of the number of rescue analgesics administered in each period. A linear regression model was fitted for NRS according to the period. Additionally, the distribution of data on the length of PACU stay and length of hospital stay was highly skewed; therefore, a log transformation was performed, and a linear regression model was fitted. A logistic regression was fitted for PCA-related complications, postoperative complications, and all-cause reoperation. For mortality, the Cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to estimate the hazard ratios because the results comprised time-to-event data. For univariate analysis showing statistical significance, a multivariate analysis was conducted including other potential confounding variables. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. SAS (version 9.4, SAS Inc.) was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 756 patients who underwent PPPD were identified. Baseline patient demographics are presented in Table 1. In this study population, the L3 skeletal muscle area (cm2) and LSMI (cm2/m2) were 128.83 (101.30, 148.19) and 47.72 (40.74, 53.41), respectively. Table 2 shows the intraoperative and postoperative variables in this study. The median (1Q, 3Q) for maximum PONV score at two postoperative days was 0 (0, 0), and that in the subgroup with PONV occurrence was 1 (1, 2). Intravenous PCA was infused at 2 ml/h and a 0.5 ml on-demand bolus dose was administered with a 15 min lockout time. Epidural PCA was infused at 5 ml/h and a 0.5 ml on-demand bolus dose was administered with a 15 min lockout time. Regarding PCA-related complications, dizziness occurred in 138 patients (18.3%), sedation in six patients (0.8%), and headache in 14 patients (1.9%). No patients were admitted to the ICU immediately after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications were as follows: wound infection, 20 (2.6%); wound dehiscence, 5 (0.7%); deep vein thrombosis, 0 (0.0%); stroke, 1 (0.1%); cardiac complications, 13 (1.7%); pneumonia, 10 (1.3%); acute kidney injury, 5 (0.7%); delirium, 12 (1.6%); overall complications, 56 (7.1%); all-cause reoperation, 9 (1.2%); and all-cause 1 year mortality, 59 (7.8%).
According to the result of the multivariate regression analysis, the occurrence of PONV was inversely correlated with the preoperative LSMI at 24–48 h and in the overall time period (24–48 h, odds ratio [OR], 0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.891 to 0.997; overall, OR, 0.971; 95% CI, 0.947 to 0.996, Table 3). Preoperative LSMI and PONV scores were negatively associated 6–24 h and 24–48 h post-surgery (6–24 h, coefficient, -0.0038; P value = 0.025; 24–48 h, coefficient, -0.050; P value = 0.030).
No significant association was noted between preoperative LSMI, postoperative NRS, and the number of rescue analgesics administered (Table 4). Furthermore, no association was present between preoperative LSMI and the duration of PCA administration, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that low preoperative LSMI was independently correlated with PONV scores 6–48 h post-surgery and PONV occurrence 2 days post-surgery. In contrast, a correlation between sarcopenia and postoperative pain was not observed. In our study population, preoperative LSMI was not associated with postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, or the 1-year mortality rate.
PONV is very common after surgery, although its importance has long been overlooked [18,19]. Furthermore, patient discomfort can be significant and was called the “Big little problem [20].” PONV reduces patient satisfaction, increases morbidity, and occasionally causes serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance because of vomiting, as well as delayed mobilization and increased length of hospital stay [21]. Several risk factors have been identified for PONV, such as Apfel score, type of surgery including laparoscopy, and anesthetic agents (inhalation, opioid) [17,22]. However, the exact mechanism by which risk factors predispose patients to PONV is poorly understood. Therefore, efforts to identify the risk factors for PONV remain meaningful. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to show a correlation between preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative PONV.
Nausea and vomiting occur when various pathways affecting the vomiting center in the brainstem are stimulated by stresses such as motion, pain, or anesthetic agents including inhalational agents or opioids [23,24]. The gut–brain interaction also induces PONV, and mechanical stimulation of the gastrointestinal tract or gastric distension can cause secretion of emetic neurotransmitters [25,26]. Anesthetic methods can also affect gastrointestinal function. In particular, inhalational agents can stimulate the vagal afferent pathway, which induces emetic reflux [27], opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and gastric distention [28]. Accordingly, laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia, and postoperative opioid use are risk factors for PONV. Postoperative ileus is a common complication. Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between sarcopenia and delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing PPPD [29,30], which could be one possible reason for increased risk of PONV in sarcopenic patients in current study. An association between sarcopenia and nausea has been reported in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Chemotherapy causes nausea and sarcopenia, and sarcopenia alone also increases the risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity such as nausea and anorexia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer [14,15]. In a recent study including patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a low total psoas area measured with lumbar CT images was a predictor of complications such as pain and nausea [16]. Therefore, our data showing the association between sarcopenia and PONV are consistent with those of previous studies.
Several studies have investigated the effects of preoperative sarcopenia on the risk of postoperative complications. In previous meta-analyses evaluating gastrointestinal cancer surgeries [31] and urologic cancer surgeries [32], preoperative sarcopenia increased the risk of major complications and was an independent prognostic factor for short survival and increased mortality after surgery. In a previous study evaluating hepatic resection for Klatskin tumors conducted at our institution [33], preoperative sarcopenia was associated with postoperative ICU admission, length of ICU stay, postoperative complication rate, and in-hospital mortality. In contrast, we found no association between preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative complications or mortality. The relatively low disease severity in our study population could explain this discrepancy with previous studies. While 61.8% of the patients were admitted to the ICU immediately after hepatic resection in a previous study [33], none were admitted to the ICU immediately after PPPD in our study.
Evidence suggests that sarcopenia is related to chronic pain [34-36]. Nonetheless, in this study, no correlation was noted between preoperative sarcopenia and acute postoperative pain in terms of pain scores or the number of rescue analgesic administrations. Pain control with intravenous PCA could explain these results; however, data on the PCA volume administered were insufficient in this retrospective study.
This study had several limitations. First, the study was performed by retrospectively reviewing electronic medical records, which may carry an inherent bias. However, we calibrated the results by incorporating as many potential confounding variables as possible to minimize the risk of bias. Second, the data in this study were obtained from a patient cohort undergoing a single operation at a single hospital. Therefore, the generalizability of these results is limited, and future research should be conducted to verify the conclusions in other populations. Third, the LSMI is an indicator of decreased muscle mass as a component of sarcopenia. Therefore, it is not an ideal representation of sarcopenia, which includes not only decreased muscle mass, but also decreased muscle strength and physical performance. However, many studies have focused on sarcopenia based on muscle area and some have shown a strong association between muscle area and sarcopenia [37-40].
Preoperative LSMI was associated with the occurrence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing PPPD. Nonetheless, no association was observed between preoperative LSMI and postoperative pain, postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, or mortality. In conclusion, LSMI measured using preoperative abdominal CT can be a predictive indicator of PONV, and appropriate PONV prophylaxis in patients with low LSMI before PPPD should be implemented.

Notes

FUNDING

This research was funded by the Korean Society of Geriatric Anesthesia and Pain, grant number KSGAP-2020-001.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Seung Hyun Kim is the current editor of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. However, he was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Writing – original draft: Hyun Il Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Writing -review & editing: Hyun Il Kim, Ki Jun Kim, Sangil Kim, Hae Dong Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Conceptualization: Seung Hyun Kim. Data curation: Hyun Il Kim, Ki Jun Kim, Sangil Kim, Hae Dong Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Formal analysis: Hyun Il Kim, Ki Jun Kim, Sangil Kim, Hae Dong Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Methodology: Hyun Il Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Project administration: Hyun Il Kim, Ki Jun Kim, Sangil Kim, Hae Dong Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Funding acquisition: Seung Hyun Kim. Investigation: Hyun Il Kim, Ki Jun Kim, Seung Hyun Kim. Resources: Seung Hyun Kim. Supervision: Ki Jun Kim.

REFERENCES

1. Baek JY, Jung HW, Kim KM, Kim M, Park CY, Lee KP, et al. Korean Working Group on Sarcopenia guideline: expert consensus on sarcopenia screening and diagnosis by the Korean Society of Sarcopenia, the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research, and the Korean Geriatrics Society. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2023; 27:9–21.
crossref
2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010; 39:412–23.
3. Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster JY, Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0169548.
crossref
4. Wannamethee SG, Atkins JL. Muscle loss and obesity: the health implications of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015; 74:405–12.
crossref
5. Zhang H, Lin S, Gao T, Zhong F, Cai J, Sun Y, et al. Association between sarcopenia and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older non-obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018; 10:364.
crossref
6. Itoh S, Shirabe K, Yoshizumi T, Takeishi K, Harimoto N, Ikegami T, et al. Skeletal muscle mass assessed by computed tomography correlates to muscle strength and physical performance at a liver‐related hospital experience. Hepatol Res. 2016; 46:292–7.
crossref
7. Gong G, Wan W, Zhang X, Liu Y, Liu X, Yin J. Correlation between the Charlson comorbidity index and skeletal muscle mass/physical performance in hospitalized older people potentially suffering from sarcopenia. BMC Geriatr. 2019; 19:367.
crossref
8. Xiao J, Caan BJ, Feliciano EMC, Meyerhardt JA, Peng PD, Baracos VE, et al. Association of low muscle mass and low muscle radiodensity with morbidity and mortality for colon cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155:942–9.
crossref
9. Oh J, Shin WJ, Jeong D, Yun TJ, Park CS, Choi ES, et al. Low muscle mass as a prognostic factor for early postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing the Fontan operation: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2019; 8:1257.
crossref
10. Kiriya Y, Toshiaki N, Shibasaki I, Ogata K, Ogawa H, Takei Y, et al. Sarcopenia assessed by the quantity and quality of skeletal muscle is a prognostic factor for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Surg Today. 2020; 50:895–904.
crossref
11. Chae MS, Kim JW, Jung JY, Choi HJ, Chung HS, Park CS, et al. Analysis of pre-and intraoperative clinical factors for successful operating room extubation after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19:112.
12. Chae MS, Moon KU, Jung JY, Choi HJ, Chung HS, Park CS, et al. Perioperative loss of psoas muscle is associated with patient survival in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2018; 24:623–33.
crossref
13. Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreatoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020; 44:2056–84.
crossref
14. Bozzetti F. Forcing the vicious circle: sarcopenia increases toxicity, decreases response to chemotherapy and worsens with chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28:2107–18.
crossref
15. Da Rocha IMG, Marcadenti A, De Medeiros GOC, Bezerra RA, Rego JFdM, Gonzalez MC, et al. Is cachexia associated with chemotherapy toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients? A prospective study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019; 10:445–54.
crossref
16. Jin WH, Mellon EA, Frakes JM, Murimwa GZ, Hodul PJ, Pimiento JM, et al. Impact of sarcopenia in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9:24–34.
crossref
17. Apfel CC, Läärä E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:693–700.
18. Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2019; 131:411–48.
crossref
19. Weibel S, Rücker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, et al. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta‐analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 10:CD012859.
crossref
20. Kapur PA. The big “little problem”. Anesth Analg. 1991; 73:243–5.
21. Apfel C, Heidrich F, Jukar-Rao S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Whelan RP, et al. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109:742–53.
crossref
22. Apfel CC, Philip BK, Cakmakkaya OS, Shilling A, Shi YY, Leslie JB, et al. Who is at risk for postdischarge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery? Anesthesiology. 2012; 117:475–86.
crossref
23. Horn CC, Wallisch WJ, Homanics GE, Williams JP. Pathophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 722:55–66.
crossref
24. Zhong W, Shahbaz O, Teskey G, Beever A, Kachour N, Venketaraman V, et al. Mechanisms of nausea and vomiting: current knowledge and recent advances in intracellular emetic signaling systems. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:5797.
crossref
25. De Winter BY, Van den Wijngaard RM, De Jonge WJ. Intestinal mast cells in gut inflammation and motility disturbances. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012; 1822:66–73.
crossref
26. Spiller R. Serotonin and GI clinical disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2008; 55:1072–80.
crossref
27. Mutoh T, Tsubone H, Nishimura R, Sasaki N. Effects of volatile anesthetics on vagal C-fiber activities and their reflexes in anesthetized dogs. Respir Physiol. 1998; 112:253–64.
crossref
28. Kurz A, Sessler DI. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: pathophysiology and potential new therapies. Drugs. 2003; 63:649–71.
29. Tankel J, Dagan A, Vainberg E, Boaz E, Mogilevsky L, Hadas I, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with a greater incidence of delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018; 27:105–9.
crossref
30. Shintakuya R, Sasaki M, Nakamitsu A, Kohyama M, Tazaki T, Sugiyama Y, et al. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2019; 89:E433–7.
crossref
31. Simonsen C, De Heer P, Bjerre ED, Suetta C, Hojman P, Pedersen BK, et al. Sarcopenia and postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgical oncology: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018; 268:58–69.
crossref
32. Guo Z, Gu C, Gan S, Li Y, Xiang S, Gong L, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of postoperative outcomes after urologic oncology surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol. 2020; 38:560–73.
crossref
33. Jung HE, Han DH, Koo BN, Kim J. Effect of sarcopenia on postoperative ICU admission and length of stay after hepatic resection for Klatskin tumor. Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1136376.
crossref
34. Sakai Y, Matsui H, Ito S, Hida T, Ito K, Koshimizu H, et al. Sarcopenia in elderly patients with chronic low back pain. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2017; 3:195–200.
crossref
35. Choi S, Nah S, Jang H, Moon J, Han S. Association between relative handgrip strength and chronic lower back pain: a nationwide cross-sectional analysis of the Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:10770.
crossref
36. Tsuji H, Tetsunaga T, Tetsunaga T, Misawa H, Oda Y, Takao S, et al. Evaluation of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for sarcopenia screening in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A prospective cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101:e29568.
crossref
37. Boutin RD, Yao L, Canter RJ, Lenchik L. Sarcopenia: current concepts and imaging implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205:W255–66.
crossref
38. Guerri S, Mercatelli D, Gómez MPA, Napoli A, Battista G, Guglielmi G, et al. Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018; 8:60–85.
crossref
39. Rossi F, Valdora F, Bignotti B, Torri L, Succio G, Tagliafico AS. Evaluation of body computed tomography-determined sarcopenia in breast cancer patients and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2019; 21:100154.
crossref
40. Albano D, Messina C, Vitale J, Sconfienza LM. Imaging of sarcopenia: old evidence and new insights. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30:2199–208.
crossref

Table 1.
Demographic Data of Patients in This Study
Variable Value
Age (yr) 64 (57, 70)
Sex (F) 323 (42.7)
Height (cm) 163.1 (157, 169)
Weight (kg) 61 (54.7, 68.2)
BMI (kg/m2) 23.05 (21.2, 25.0)
History of motion sickness 44 (5.8)
Smoker 250 (33.1)
ASA physical status
 1/2/3/4 38 (5.0)/413 (54.6)/303 (40.1)/2 (0.3)
Apfel score
 0/1/2/3/4 65 (8.6)/237 (31.3)/250 (33.1)/182 (24.1)/22 (2.9)
Comobidities and past history
 Hypertension 292 (38.6)
 Diabetes mellitus 210 (27.8)
 Heart disease 24 (3.2)
 Kidney disease 8 (1.1)
 History of abdominal surgery 149 (19.7)
 History of preoperative chemotherapy 57 (7.5)

Values are presented as median (1Q, 3Q) or number (%). BMI: body mass index, ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Table 2.
Intraoperative and Postoperative Variables in This Study
Variable Value
Intraoperative
 Inhalation aneshesia/total intravenous anesthesia 694 (91.8)/62 (8.2)
 Anesthesia time (min) 450 (385, 520)
 Estimated blood loss (ml) 300 (150, 500)
 Intravenous PCA/Epidural PCA 707 (93.5)/49 (6.5)
 Intravenous PCA regimen (total volume of 100 ml)
  Fentanyl; μg/kg/ml 0.33 (0.29, 0.37)
  Non-opioid adjuvant 248 (35.1)
  Ramosetron 707 (100.0)
 Epidural PCA regimen (total volume of 250 ml)
  0.15% ropivacaine 49 (100.0)
  Adjuvant fentanyl; μg/kg 9.1 (7.3, 11.2)
Postoperative
 Postoperative nausea and vomiting
  PACU/0-6 h/6-24 h/24-48 h/overall 42 (5.5)/54 (7.1)/120 (15.9)/46 (6.1)/234 (31.0)
 Postoperative rescue analgesics use (number)
  PACU/0-6 h/6-24 h/24-48 h/overall 1 (0, 2)/1 (1, 2)/1 (0, 3)/1 (0, 2)/5 (3, 7)
 Numeric pain rating scale
  PACU/0-6 h/6-24 h/24-48 h 5 (3, 6)/7 (5, 8)/6 (5, 7)/5 (4, 6)
 PCA duration (day) 3 (2, 4)
 Duration of hospital stay (day) 15 (12, 22)
 PCA related complications 149 (19.7)
 Postoperative complications 54 (7.1)
 All cause reoperation 9 (1.2)
 One year mortality 59 (7.8)

Values are presented as number (%) or median (1Q, 3Q). PCA: patient-controlled analgesia, PACU: post-anesthesia care unit.

Table 3.
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses Between Preoperative Lumbar Skeletal Muscle Index and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (by Score and Occurrence) at Each Postsurgical Period
Outcomes Univariate
Multivariate
Estimate SE P value Estimate SE P value
By score
 PACU -0.0020 0.0015 0.137
 0–6 h -0.0040 0.0020 0.083
 6–24 h -0.0099 0.0029 0.001 -0.0085 0.0038 0.025
 24–48 h -0.0067 0.0018 <0.001 -0.0050 0.0023 0.030
Outcomes Univariate Multivariate
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
By occurrence
 PACU 0.983 0.947–1.020 0.353
 0–6 h 0.959 0.927–0.992 0.016 0.977 0.933–1.024 0.330
 6–24 h 0.957 0.934–0.980 <0.001 0.970 0.939–1.003 0.073
 24–48 h 0.941 0.906–0.977 0.002 0.943 0.891–0.997 0.040
 Overall 0.968 0.950–0.986 0.001 0.971 0.947–0.996 0.022

SE: standard error, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, PACU: post-anesthesia care unit.

Table 4.
Univariate Analyses Between Preoperative Lumbar Skeletal Muscle Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Number of Rescue Analgesics Administration Postoperatively at Each Postsurgical Period
Outcomes Estimate SE P value
Numeric pain rating scale
 PACU 0.0104 0.0077 0.177
 0–6 h -0.0022 0.0094 0.814
 6–24 h -0.0123 0.0081 0.130
 24–48 h 0.0099 0.0079 0.215
Outcomes RR 95% CI P value
Rescue analgesics administration
  PACU 1.002 0.994–1.010 0.619
  0–6 h 1.002 0.994–1.010 0.615
  6–24 h 0.997 0.990–1.004 0.411
  24–48 h 1.006 0.997–1.015 0.188
  Overall 1.001 0.996–1.007 0.587

SE: standard error, RR: relative risk, CI: confidence interval, PACU: post-anesthesia care unit.

Table 5.
Univariate Analyses Between Preoperative Lumbar Skeletal Muscle Index and Complications, duration of PCA Administration and Hospital Stay, and Mortality
Outcomes OR 95% CI P value
PCA related complications 0.988 0.97–1.009 0.250
Postoperative complications 1.008 0.975–1.041 0.650
All cause reoperation 1.056 0.978–1.140 0.162
Outcomes Estimate SE P value
PCA duration (day) 0.0007 0.002 0.721
Hospital stay duration (day) 0.0009 0.0019 0.628
Outcomes HR 95% CI P value
Mortality 1.005 0.975–1.035 0.757

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, SE: standard error, HR: hazard ratio, PACU: post-anesthesia care unit, PCA: patient-controlled analgesia.

TOOLS
Similar articles