Dear Editor,
Severe muscle injuries can lead to the release of myoglobin into the bloodstream, subsequently filtering into the urine via the kidneys [1, 2]. Elevated myoglobin levels can be detrimental to the kidneys, causing renal damage or failure. Therefore, urinary myoglobin measurement is crucial; however, existing commercially available kits are designed for serum or plasma [3, 4]. High myoglobin concentrations in serum or plasma can induce a high-dose hook effect [5, 6]. Using a serum or plasma myoglobin assay for urine specimens poses a risk of a hook effect owing to high myoglobin concentrations that may be present in urine from patients with severe muscle injuries [1, 7]. Therefore, the predilution of urine specimens would address high concentrations and potential hook effect but may impact accuracy as diluted specimens might approach the assay sensitivity [4].
Various urinary myoglobin dilutions were evaluated using the Elecsys Myoglobin assay (Cat#. 12178214160; Roche Diagnostics; Indianapolis, IN, USA) on a cobas e602 analyzer, which has an analytical measuring interval (AMI) of 1.18–168.54 nmol/L (21–3,000 ng/mL). Results were reported in ng/mL and converted to the International System of Units based on the molecular weight of myoglobin (17.8 kD) [8]. Residual, de-identified, frozen (−20°C) urine specimens were used (IRB protocol #00007275; informed consent waived). Specimens were pH-adjusted to 8–9 at the time of collection using Na2CO3. Specimens were diluted onboard with Elecsys Diluent Universal (Roche Diagnostics), and dilutions of 1:400 were previously investigated in accordance with CLSI guidelines (CLSI EP34) [9].
As a preliminary assessment, urine specimens (N=7; 56.19–1,516.85 nmol/L) were retested without dilution (neat) and at a 1:50 dilution. Of these, one produced a suspected hook effect, where the neat result was 100.00 nmol/L but was 1,496.46 nmol/L at a 1:50 dilution. This suggests that a hook effect in urine may occur at lower analyte concentrations than specified for the serum matrix by the manufacturer, as a hook effect does not occur for serum myoglobin concentrations up to 1,685.39 nmol/L [4]. For all remaining specimens (N=6; 23.76–68.03 nmol/L), the results were elevated by approximately 2.5-fold when using a 1:50 dilution, suggesting that the specimens had concentrations low enough to impede a dilution of that magnitude, potentially affecting measurement accuracy.
To investigate whether a lower dilution factor would allow the detection of a hook effect while providing more accurate results, additional urine specimens (N=35; 56.19–33,539.33 nmol/L) were reanalyzed neat, 1:10, and 1:50 dilutions. Specimens below the AMI (<168.54 nmol/L) were categorized as not exhibiting a hook effect. Specimens that produced results above the AMI after a 1:50 dilution (>8,426.97 nmol/L) were further diluted at 1:400. A hook effect was detected in 30 of the 35 specimens at both the 1:10 and 1:50 dilutions, with several specimens requiring a 1:400 dilution to obtain a result (Table 1).
Further, we performed a recovery experiment by serially diluting a high-concentration urine specimen (48,744.33 nmol/L) with a low-concentration urine specimen (6.18 nmol/L). Expected concentrations were calculated based on the high- and low-concentration specimens used. Each serially diluted specimen was tested neat and at 1:10, 1:50, and 1:400 dilutions, and the results were compared to the expected concentrations. However, the dilutions were only performed when the anticipated concentration was within the AMI of the assay (1.18–168.54 nmol/L). The acceptable limit of recovery (80.4%–119.6%) was based on a previously reported total allowable error for myoglobin in serum [10]. For each of the 1:10, 1:50, and 1:400 dilutions, recoveries exceeded 119.6% when the diluted specimen result (prior to correcting for the dilution factor) was 4.06–37.29 nmol/L (Table 2). The manufacturer recommends that the serum concentration after dilution should exceed 2.81 nmol/L; nevertheless, we observed that a higher concentration may be necessary for diluted urine specimens. Diluted results were within acceptable limits of recovery when the diluted specimen produced results between 35.86–132.19 nmol/L (Table 2). These findings demonstrate that accuracy reduces with decreasing myoglobin concentrations owing to the dilution process. Therefore, a smaller predilution factor (1:10) is recommended with additional dilutions (1:50 and 1:400) as necessary to detect a hook effect while avoiding inaccuracies for low-concentration specimens.
Overall, these findings support a predilution step when analyzing urine specimens using the Roche Myoglobin assay. A hook effect was observed in urine at lower concentrations than the serum hook effect threshold reported in the assay package insert. We conclude that to effectively use a serum myoglobin assay to measure myoglobin in urine, an appropriate predilution factor should be carefully validated to enable the detection of a high-dose hook effect while producing results with good accuracy and clinical acceptability.
Notes
References
1. Anwar MY, Gupta V. 2022. Myoglobinuria. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing;Treasure Island (FL): p. 1–3. DOI: 10.1007/springerreference_36050.
2. Chen-Levy Z, Wener MH, Toivola B, Daum P, Reyes M, Fine JS. 2005; Factors affecting urinary myoglobin stability in vitro. Am J Clin Pathol. 123:432–8. DOI: 10.1309/9AQ62FR265ER3E2W. PMID: 15716240.
3. de Waard H, van 't Sant P. 2009; Use of serum myoglobin assays for urine myoglobin measurements can cause false-negative results. Clin Chem. 55:1240–1. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.118968. PMID: 19342504.
4. Elecsys Myoglobin Package Insert. 2022-10, v.8.0. Roche Diagnostics;Indianapolis, IN, USA: DOI: 10.4135/9781452229669.n2548.
5. Kurt-Mangold M, Drees D, Krasowski MD. 2012; Extremely high myoglobin plasma concentrations producing hook effect in a critically ill patient. Clin Chim Acta. 414:179–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.024. PMID: 22960204.
6. Kikuchi H, Ohta A, Takahashi Y, Shibata A, Ohtake T, Watanabe K. 2003; High-dose hook effect in an immunochromatography-optical quantitative reader method for myoglobin. Clin Chem. 49:1709–10. DOI: 10.1373/49.10.1709. PMID: 14500606.
7. Tate J, Ward G. 2004; Interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem Rev. 25:105–20. DOI: 10.1177/00045632241240306. PMID: 18458713. PMCID: PMC1904417.
8. Lamb EJ, Jones GRD. Rifai N, Chiu RWK, editors. 2022. Kidney function tests. Tietz textbook of laboratory medicine. 7th ed. Elsevier;Saint-Louis, MO: p. 1531–91. DOI: 10.1515/9783111433998-058.
9. CLSI. 2018. Validating an extended measuring interval. Establishing and verifying an extended measuring interval through specimen dilution and spiking. 1st ed. CLSI EP34. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;Wayne, PA: p. 46–55.
10. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, García-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. 1999; Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 59:491–500. DOI: 10.1080/00365519950185229. PMID: 10667686.
Table 1
Table 2
Expected concentration (nmol/L) | Result of diluted specimen* (nmol/L) | Dilution | Final reported result* (nmol/L) | % Recovery |
---|---|---|---|---|
48,744.33 | 121.86 | 1:400 | 48,744.33 | 100.0 |
24,375.28 | 68.00 | 1:400 | 27,201.07 | 111.6 |
12,190.73 | 35.86 | 1:400 | 14,342.58 | 117.7 |
6,098.48 | 132.19 | 1:50 | 6,609.66 | 108.4 |
3,052.36 | 67.31 | 1:50 | 3,365.67 | 110.3 |
1,529.27 | 37.29 | 1:50 | 1,864.61 | 121.9 |
767.75 | 84.94 | 1:10 | 849.44 | 110.6 |
386.97 | 44.03 | 1:10 | 440.34 | 113.8 |
196.57 | 23.51 | 1:10 | 235.11 | 119.6 |
101.40 | 12.90 | 1:10 | 129.04 | 127.3 |
53.82 | 6.75 | 1:10 | 67.53 | 125.5 |
30.00 | 4.06 | 1:10 | 40.56 | 135.2 |
18.09 | Not applicable | No dilution | 18.93 | 104.6 |
12.13 | Not applicable | No dilution | 12.87 | 106.1 |
9.16 | Not applicable | No dilution | 9.61 | 104.9 |
7.70 | Not applicable | No dilution | 7.87 | 102.2 |
6.97 | Not applicable | No dilution | 7.08 | 101.6 |