Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.38(47) > 1516084951

Lee, Ko, Park, Kang, Lee, Hong, Kim, Lee, Kang, Kim, Kim, Eun, Cho, Kim, Kim, Lee, Lee, Oh, Park, Hwang, Sohn, Lim, Kim, and Lee: A Report on a Nationwide Surveillance System for Pediatric Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Etiology in Korea

Abstract

Background

Several cases of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology related to adenoviral infections have been reported in Europe since January 2022. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence, severity, possible etiology, and prognosis of the disease with those in the past in Korea.

Methods

The surveillance group collected data between May and November 2022 using a surveillance system. Acute hepatitis of unknown etiology was defined in patients aged < 16 years with a serum transaminase level > 500 IU/L, not due to hepatitis A-E or other underlying causes. For comparison, data from 18 university hospitals were retrospectively collected as a control group between January 2021 and April 2022.

Results

We enrolled 270 patients (mean age, 5 years). The most common symptom was fever. However, the incidence was similar between 2021 and 2022. Liver function test results, number of patients with acute liver failure (ALF), liver transplantation (LT), death, and adenovirus detection rates did not differ between the two groups. None of the adenovirus-positive patients in either group experienced ALF, LT, or death. In the surveillance group, adenovirus-associated virus-2 was detected in four patients, one of whom underwent LT. Patients with an unknown etiology showed significantly higher bilirubin levels, a lower platelet count, and a higher LT rate than patients with a possible etiology.

Conclusion

The incidence of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology and adenovirus detection rate have not increased in Korea.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-38-e401-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Acute hepatitis in children is caused by various infectious pathogens, including viruses. Most viral hepatitis cases improve spontaneously, except for a few, including hepatotropic viruses in children.123 Therefore, pediatricians are often unaware of this self-resolving acute viral hepatitis.4
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported 74 cases of acute hepatitis in children aged < 10 years, not caused by hepatitis A–E, between January 2022 and April 8, mostly in the United Kingdom (UK), during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a unique inflection point for global health.5 Since then, the WHO has reported that approximately 169 pediatric patients with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology have been diagnosed in 11 countries, including Spain, Israel, Denmark, Italy, the UK, and the United States of America (USA). In the reported cases, patients showed elevated aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) levels > 500 IU/L and jaundice without fever. Adenoviruses were detected in 74 cases, and a potential link with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was considered.6 A technical briefing from the UK Health Security Agency also reported 163 cases of acute non-A-E hepatitis in the UK, and 91 (72% of the tested cases) had adenoviruses. They hypothesized that the increased pediatric acute non-A-E hepatitis due to normal adenovirus infection with abnormal susceptibility or host response was because of a lack of exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic or a coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 or a toxin, drug, or environmental exposure.7 In Alabama, USA, nine children with acute hepatitis without known causes were identified between October 1 and February 28, 2022. Among them, eight tested positive for adenovirus. Liver failure and liver transplantation (LT) rates were high (33.3% and 22.2%, respectively), and three patients with liver failure showed a higher adenoviral load.8 Subsequently, next-generation sequencing revealed adenovirus-associated virus-2 (AAV2) in the plasma and liver of many patients with acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology but not in healthy controls.9 Previously, AAV2 was not considered a disease-causing virus but as a viral vector using in vitro or in vivo gene transfer. However, its discovery in many patients with non-A-E acute hepatitis in Europe and the USA has raised suspicions that it is a virus that can modify acute hepatitis. In addition, AAV2 may be associated with the prevalence of acute hepatitis as a helper virus of human adenovirus in some susceptible individuals having a human leukocyte antigen class II status.9 Accordingly, an association between AAV2 and acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in children was suggested.
Therefore, monitoring the incidence of acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea and providing appropriate diagnostic tests, including adenovirus and AAV2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are crucial. Accordingly, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), Korean Society of Pediatrics, Korean Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, and Korean Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases established a nationwide surveillance system and conducted diagnostic tests to identify the cause of acute hepatitis having an infectious etiology. After this surveillance system was established, we performed this study to compare the incidence, severity, etiology, and prognosis of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology with those in the past in Korea. We systematically analyzed the results of our surveillance system regarding the status of acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea.

METHODS

Study population and definition

Acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology was defined as a patient aged < 16 years with AST or ALT levels > 500 IU/L during the study period, not due to hepatitis A-E, and no metabolic, inherited/genetic, congenital, mechanical, or other underlying causes.610 We collected data from two different groups: the surveillance and control groups (Fig. 1). We established a nationwide surveillance system from May to November 2022. Using this surveillance system, we systematically collected prospective data and supporting diagnostic tests. The historical control group data were retrospectively collected from January 2021 to April 2022 for comparison with previous traditional acute hepatitis diagnoses and treatments. To reduce bias, such as seasonal variability and differences in study period, we analyzed patients who had visited the hospital from May to November 2021 as the control subgroup, which was the same month as that of the surveillance group. We included all LT centers and major university hospitals in all regions of South Korea as controls.
Fig. 1

A flow diagram of the current study of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea.

AST = aspartate transaminase, ALT = alanine transaminase.
jkms-38-e401-g001

Clinical and laboratory data

Demographic, biochemical, radiological, and histological data were collected from the surveillance and control groups. Major symptoms, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, underlying diseases, travel history, and family history of liver disease were recorded. Complete blood cell counts and liver function tests were used to collect biochemical data, including the maximum levels of AST, ALT, total bilirubin (TB), prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR), and albumin. Direct bilirubin (DB) was typically detected in patients with elevated TB levels. Liver ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography (CT) findings were evaluated. Histological findings were evaluated in patients who underwent liver biopsy or LT. Hepatic necrosis, intranuclear inclusions, and adenovirus immunochemistry results were also evaluated.11
We aimed to evaluate treatment modalities, severity, and prognosis of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology. Data on treatment modalities, such as antiviral agents, steroids, antibiotics, and intravenous immunoglobulins, were collected. The duration of admission to the general ward and the number of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were recorded. Acute liver failure (ALF) was defined as coagulopathy not corrected with vitamin K and a PT-INR > 1.5 in patients with encephalopathy or as a PT-INR > 2 in patients with or without encephalopathy.12 Data on the number of patients with ALF, LT, death, and recovery were collected.

Evaluation of possible etiologies

To investigate the possible etiology, we collected test results for possible pathogens, such as serological or molecular tests for hepatitis A-E, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), enterovirus, human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), parvovirus B19, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1, HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, leptospirosis, human immunodeficiency virus, and blood culture.713 If respiratory specimens were available, the results of respiratory PCR for SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, rhinovirus, and parainfluenza virus were collected. The results of the stool culture or PCR were also collected, if available.
During surveillance, the KDCA tested whole blood, serum, respiratory, and stool samples for possible etiologies, including adenovirus, AAV2, and SARS-CoV-2. At the KDCA, all viral and bacterial tests were performed using PCR, and fecal bacterial tests were performed.
The AAV2 test was performed on whole blood samples obtained from the KDCA, and conventional PCR and gene sequencing were performed on positive samples after real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing (minimum detection limit of the gene detection method: 100 copies/mL).
An expert meeting was conducted monthly to evaluate the possible etiologies of hepatitis in the surveillance system. At the expert meeting, we checked the test results and clinical manifestations and classified the participants into subgroups by voting whether they had a possible etiology of hepatitis or not. Hepatotoxic drugs were evaluated as a possible etiology of hepatitis depending on the number and duration of medication use. Patients were classified as “unknown etiology” in absence of evidence of a possible hepatitis etiology, and as “possible etiology” if such evidence was present. We further classified our participants into three subgroups according to adenovirus detection: unknown etiology, possible etiology, and adenovirus.

Statistical analysis

The incidence was compared between 2021 and 2022 to confirm whether or not acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology, which has been prevalent overseas since January 2022, was also present in Korea in 2022. However, other analyses were conducted for the surveillance and control groups because the study population, data collection methods, and supporting diagnostic tests differed between the two groups. The incidence was calculated by dividing the number of newly diagnosed acute hepatitis cases of unknown etiology by the number of Korean children aged 0–16 years in 2021 and 2022. Korean population data were extracted from the Korean Statistical Information Service (https://kosis.kr/index/index.do).
Categorical variables, such as sex, etiology, symptoms, results of radiological and histological examinations, treatments, and severity, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables, such as age, admission duration, and laboratory test results, were compared using the analysis of variance with post hoc analysis or t-test. Non-parametric tests were used for non-normally distributed variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics software (version 27.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Two-sided P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Ethics statement

The data were collected for disease surveillance by the KDCA, and because the data were reviewed retrospectively, the requirement for obtaining informed consent was waived. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of all included hospitals, including Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (05-2023-045).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, frequency, and incidence

We enrolled 270 patients (115 girls and 155 boys; mean age: 5.05 ± 5.0 years). Among these, 82 and 188 patients were enrolled in the surveillance and control groups, respectively (Table 1). One hundred forty-three patients were diagnosed in 2021 and 127 in 2022 (until November). In our surveillance study, the incidence of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology was 19.995/1,000,000 in 2021 and 19.997/1,000,000 in 2022. No outbreaks were observed in Korea in 2022. In the surveillance group, most patients were reported from the Gyeongsang Province (n = 30) and Seoul (n = 26), followed by Jeolla (n = 10), Gyeonggi (n = 7), Chungcheong (n = 3), Jeju (n = 3), and Gangwon (n = 3) Provinces. A similar distribution of patients was confirmed in the control group as follows: Seoul (n = 59), Gyeongsang (n = 55), Jeolla (n = 31), Gyeonggi (n = 13), Jeju (n = 14), Chungcheong (n = 9), and Gangwon (n = 7) Provinces.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of pediatric patients with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea

jkms-38-e401-i001
Variables Total (N = 270) Surveillance (n = 82) Control (n = 188) P value
Female 115 (42.6) 48 (58.5) 67 (35.6) 0.001
Male 155 (57.4) 34 (48.5) 121 (64.4)
Unknown etiology 156 (57.8) 33 (40.2) 123 (65.4) < 0.001
Possible etiology 114 (42.2) 49 (59.8) 65 (34.6)
Age, yr 5.05 ± 5.0 4.84 ± 4.30 5.14 ± 5.29 0.629
Height, cm 103.89 ± 24.48 102.61 ± 33.46 104.5 ± 40.55 0.701
Weight, kg 24.48 ± 21.55 21.95 ± 17.79 25.58 ± 22.95 0.169
History of SARS-CoV-2 infection 48 (17.8) 30 (36.6) 18 (10.2) < 0.001
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination 6 (2.2) 3 (3.7) 3 (1.8) 0.354
History of hepatotoxic drugs 9 (3.3) 6a (7.3) 3b (1.6) 0.164
History of travel abroad/Contact with hepatitis patients 0 0 0 NA
Family history of liver disease 4 (1.5) 2c (2.4) 2d (1) NA
Underlying disease 4 (1.5) 4e (4.9) 0 NA
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
aAcetaminophen 4, ceftriaxone 1, and topiramate 1; bAcetaminophen 1, herbal medication 2; cHepatitis A 1, hepatitis B 1; dHepatitis C 1, fatty liver 1; eCongenital heart disease 1, neurologic disorder 2, hematologic disorder 1, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 1.
More possible hepatitis etiologies were observed in the surveillance group than in the control group (Table 1). The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly higher in the surveillance group; however, the vaccination rate was low (1.8–3.7%) in both groups without a significant difference. Nine patients had a history of hepatotoxic drug ingestion; the most common hepatotoxic drug was acetaminophen (55.5%), followed by herbal medications (22.2%).
The most common symptom in both groups was fever (64.4%), followed by vomiting, respiratory symptoms, and abdominal pain (Supplementary Table 1). Jaundice (16.4%) was not a dominant symptom in this study population. On physical examination, hepatomegaly was observed in 13% of the patients. Most patients were alert (91.6%); however, some showed an altered mental status (3%).

Results of laboratory, radiological, and histological evaluation

All participants had AST and ALT levels > 1,000 IU/L (Table 2). The TB, DB, and PT-INR levels were also elevated; however, no significant differences were observed between the surveillance and control groups. Liver ultrasonography was performed in 183 (67.8%) patients and liver CT in 42 (15.6%). Among the patients who underwent liver ultrasonography, 51.9% showed normal results, whereas only 19% of patients who underwent CT showed normal findings. The most common abnormal finding on liver ultrasonography and CT was hepatomegaly. No differences were observed in the frequency of radiological findings between the two groups. A liver biopsy was performed on eight (9.8%) patients in the surveillance group and 15 (8.2%) in the control group. Necrosis and intrahepatic cholestasis were observed in some patients; however, none had intranuclear inclusions or positive adenovirus immunochemical results.
Table 2

Results of laboratory, radiological, and histological evaluation for pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea

jkms-38-e401-i002
Variables Total (N = 270) Surveillance (n = 82) Control (n = 188) P value
AST, U/L 1,283.53 ± 3,025.67 1,782.06 ± 4,864.97 1,066.08 ± 1,661.51 0.197
ALT, U/L 1,255.00 ± 1,626.87 1,404.49 ± 2,512.29 1,189.80 ± 1,029.22 0.457
TB, mg/dL 2.70 ± 4.91 2.73 ± 4.66 2.68 ± 5.03 0.944
DB, mg/dL 2.59 ± 4.43 2.10 ± 3.79 2.86 ± 4.75 0.254
Albumin, g/dL 3.99 ± 1.80 3.87 ± 0.60 4.05 ± 2.12 0.472
PT-INR 1.68 ± 4.42 1.39 ± 0.89 1.81 ± 5.29 0.506
Total WBC, ×103/μL 9.08 ± 4.81 10.07 ± 5.35 8.65 ± 4.51 0.026*
Platelet, 103/uL 301.10 ± 140.37 286.70 ± 129.96 307.34 ± 144.54 0.270
hs-CRP, mg/L 6.25 ± 22.01 9.08 ± 29.39 4.95 ± 17.59 0.253
ESR, mm/hr 14.77 ± 17.21 15.33 ± 19.22 14.45 ± 16.04 0.733
Liver sonography 183 (67.8) 54 (65.9) 129 (68.6) 1.000
Normal 95 (51.9) 22 (40.7) 73 (57) 0.052
Hepatosplenomegaly 41 (22.4) 13 (24.5) 28 (21.7) 0.703
Gall bladder, duct abnormalitya 31 (16.9) 14 (25.9) 17 (13.2) 0.051
Portal edema 29 (15.8) 12 (22.2) 17 (13.2) 0.182
Increased echogenicity 13 (7.1) 4 (7.4) 9 (7.0) 1.000
Ascites 15 (8.2) 9 (17) 6 (4.7) 0.014
Liver CT 42 (15.6) 14 (17.1) 28 (14.9) 0.597
Normal 8 (19) 2 (14.3) 6 (23) 0.697
Hepatosplenomegaly 21 (50) 9 (64.3) 12 (42.9) 0.326
Gall bladder, duct abnormalitya 16 (38.1) 5 (35.7) 11 (39.3) 1.000
Portal edema 22 (52.4) 7 (50) 15 (53.6) 1.000
Ascites 18 (42.9) 5 (35.7) 13 (46.4) 0.742
Liver biopsy 23 (8.5) 8 (9.8) 15 (8.2) 0.637
Necrosis 1 (14.3) 2 (13.3)
Intrahepatic cholestasis 2 (13.3)
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
AST = aspartate transaminase, ALT = alanine transaminase, TB = total bilirubin, DB = direct bilirubin, PT-INR = prothrombin time – international normalized ratio, WBC = white blood cell count, CRP = C-reactive protein, hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CT = computed tomography.
aGB wall thickening, GB sludge, and intrahepatic duct dilatation.
*The P value is less than 0.05 in the analysis between the surveillance group (May to November 2022) and control subgroup (May to November 2021).

Investigation for possible causative etiology

Hepatitis E tests were performed more frequently in the surveillance group (n = 49, 59.8%) than in the control group (n = 23, 12.2%; P < 0.001). Tests supported by the KDCA, and those for several other pathogens, were also performed significantly more frequently in the surveillance group than in the control group (Table 3). Adenoviruses were tested in 97.6% and 36.7% of the surveillance and control groups, respectively. Tests for EBV and CMV were commonly performed in both groups and showed relatively high detection rates. SARS-CoV-2 detection rate was significantly higher in the surveillance group than that in the control group.
Table 3

Investigation for possible etiology for pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea

jkms-38-e401-i003
Test Number of tests performed Number of positive results
Surveillance Control P value Surveillance Control P value
Blood
Adenovirus (Blood/Stool/Respiratory) PCRa 80 (97.6%) 69 (36.7%) < 0.001* 11 (13.8%) 6 (8.7%) 0.443
67/69/76 0/15/63 0/9/6 0/0/6
AAV2 PCRa 67 (81.7%) 0 4 (6.0%)
Epstein Barr virus (PCR/serology) 74 (90.2%) 149 (79.3%) < 0.001* 11 (14.9%) 13 (8.7%) 0.164
Cytomegalovirus (PCR/serology) 74 (90.2%) 140 (74.5%) < 0.001* 9 (11.0%) 23 (16.4%) 0.546
Enterovirus PCRa 56 (68.3%) 12 (6.4%) < 0.001* 1 (1.8%) 0 0.086
Human herpes virus-6 PCR 3 (3.7%) 11 (5.9%) 0.562 1 (33.3%) 1 (0.5%) 0.482
Parvovirus B19 PCR 8 (9.8%) 25 (13.3%) 0.545 0 2 (8%) 0.533
Herpes simplex virus-1 and 2 PCR 5 (6.1%) 18 (9.6%) 0.478 0 0 NA
Varicella zoster virus PCR/IgM 3 (3.7%) 4 (2.1%) 0.759 0 0 NA
Leptospira Ab 1 (1.2%) 1 (0.5%) 0.516 0 0 NA
Anti-streptolysin O antibody 11 (13.4%) 22 (11.7%) 0.690 0 2 (10.1%) 0.529
Anti-human immunodeficiency virus 10 (12.2%) 23 (12.2%) 1.000 0 0 NA
Positive for blood culture 59 (72%) 125 (66.5%) 0.398 1b (1.7%) 3c (2.4%) 0.644
Stool
Enterovirus PCRa 58 (70.7%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 3 (5.1%) 0
Salmonella PCRa/culture 69 (84.1%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 2 (2.9%) 0 1.000
Shigella PCRa/culture 67 (81.7%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 0 0 NA
Campylobacter PCRa/culture 66 (80.5%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 0 0 NA
E. coli O157 PCRa/culture 65 (79.3%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 1 (1.5%) 0 1.000
Norovirus PCRa 71 (86.6%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 6 (8.5%) 1 (2.9%) 0.424
Sapovirus PCRa 66 (80.5%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 3 (4.5%) 0 0.549
Rotavirus PCR 47 (57.3%) 34 (18.1%) < 0.001* 2 (4.3%) 0 0.507
Respiratory
SARS-CoV-2 PCRa 74 (90.2%) 131 (69.7%) < 0.001* 11 (14.9%) 8 (6.1%) 0.046
Influenza PCRa 76 (92.7%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 2 (2.6%) 0 0.501
Respiratory syncytial virus PCRa 75 (91.5%) 65 (34.6%) < 0.001* 6 (8.0%) 0 1.000
Rhinovirus PCR 61 (74.4%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 12 (19.7%) 9 (14.3%) 0.479
Parainfluenza virus PCR 61 (74.4%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 5 (8.2%) 5 (7.9%) 1.000
Human coronavirus PCR 61 (74.4%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 1 (1.6%) 0 0.492
Bocavirus PCR 61 (74.4%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 2 (3.3%) 1 (1.6%) 0.616
Metapneumovirus PCR 61 (74.4%) 63 (33.5%) < 0.001* 4 (6.6%) 1 (1.6%) 0.204
Throat culture 6 (7.3%) 0 0.001 0 NA NA
Urine
Toxin 5 (6.1%) 0 0.002 0 NA NA
Leptospira 2 (2.4%) 0 0.091 0 NA NA
PCR = polymerase chain reaction, AAV2 = adenovirus associates virus-2, Ig = immunoglobulin, E. coli = Escherichia coli, NA = not applicable.
aTest supported by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
b Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis.
c Klebsiella pneumoniae.
*The P value is less than 0.05 in the analysis between the surveillance group (May to November 2022) and control subgroup (May to November 2021).
Blood adenovirus PCR was performed only in the surveillance group, and none of the blood samples yielded positive results. In total, 11 (13.8%) patients in the surveillance group had adenovirus in their stool and respiratory samples (nine and six, respectively). In the control group, adenovirus was detected in respiratory samples from six patients, and adenovirus positivity did not differ between the two groups. AAV2 was tested in 67 (81.7%) patients in the surveillance group and detected in four (6%) patients. Of the four reported cases, one was confirmed to be respiratory adenovirus PCR-positive, one was stool enterovirus-positive, one was parainfluenza virus PCR-positive, and one had no other pathogens. HHV-6 and HHV-7 were not checked in patients positive for AAV2.

Treatment, severity, and prognosis

The mean admission duration was 7.79 ± 8.47 days in the surveillance group and 7.44 ± 19.06 in the control group (P = 0.875). Seven patients (8.9%) in the surveillance group and 11 (5.9%) in the control group were admitted to the ICU (P = 0.424). Antibiotics were the most commonly used in both groups, followed by steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, and antiviral agents (Supplementary Table 2). The ALF rate did not differ between the two groups: five (6.3%) in the surveillance group and eight (4.3%) in the control group. LT was performed in four (5.0%) patients in the surveillance group and five (2.7%) in the control group, without significant differences between the two groups. Most patients (80.8–82.7%) recovered in both groups; however, the surveillance group included more patients who were still being followed up (15.1%). The transfer rate was higher in the control group (11.4%) than that in the surveillance group (1.5%).
Only one patient died in the surveillance group; she had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result, but adenovirus was not detected in her respiratory samples. She was not tested for adenovirus or AAV2 in her blood. Three of the four patients detected with AAV2 in the surveillance group fully recovered, whereas one 7-month-old boy underwent emergency LT for ALF. He showed no cause of acute hepatitis other than AAV2, and a blood specimen was obtained from this patient after LT for AAV2 testing. In the control group, three patients died, and none had detectable adenovirus or SARS-CoV-2.

Comparisons among unknown etiology, possible etiology, and adenovirus subgroups

In the surveillance group, patients in the possible etiology subgroup had significantly higher mean TB and DB levels (P = 0.004 and P = 0.013, respectively) and lower white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts (P = 0.004 and P = 0.011, respectively) (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table 3). The mean AST, ALT, albumin, and PT-INR levels did not differ between the two subgroups. Four of the five patients who underwent LT were in the unknown etiology subgroup.
Fig. 2

Differences in laboratory test results of pediatric acute hepatitis in Korea. (A) Differences in laboratory test results between the unknown- and possible-etiology subgroups of pediatric acute hepatitis in Korea during the surveillance system. (B) Differences in laboratory test results among the unknown-etiology, possible-etiology, and adenovirus subgroups of pediatric acute hepatitis in Korea during the surveillance system.

TB = total bilirubin, DB = direct bilirubin, WBC = white blood cell count.
*P < 0.05.
jkms-38-e401-g002
On comparing the subgroups, including the adenovirus subgroup, only the unknown- and possible-etiology subgroups showed the same differences in TB, DB, WBC, and platelet counts; however, there were no differences in the adenovirus subgroup (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Table 4). None of the 17 adenovirus-positive patients in the surveillance or control group experienced liver failure, LT, or death.

Control subgroup

The number of patients with acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology in the historical control subgroup, who had visited between May and November 2021, was 89 (male 55 and female 34). The mean age was 5.42 ± 5.19 years, which did not significantly differ from that of the surveillance group (P = 0.433). The frequency of a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly lower the control subgroup than the surveillance group (9.1% vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001). The mean AST, ALT, TB, DB, and PT-INR levels did not differ significantly between the surveillance and control subgroups, whereas the WBC count did (Table 2). Investigation results on possible etiologies did not differ significantly. Tests for adenovirus, EBV, CMV, enterovirus, respiratory viruses, and stool virus and bacteria were also conducted more frequently in the surveillance group than control subgroup, while positivity did not differ significantly (Table 3). The prognosis of the surveillance group and control subgroup were also the same as the results of surveillance and the control groups (Supplementary Table 2). Numbers of patients with ALF (n = 2, 2.2%), LTs (n = 1, 1.1%), and deaths (n = 2, 2.3%) in the control subgroup did not differ significantly from those in the surveillance group.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we established a nationwide surveillance system and performed diagnostic tests, including those for adenovirus and AAV2, for pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea. We compared the incidence, severity, and prognosis of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology between surveillance and historical control groups.
Patients in the surveillance group were examined for infectious etiology more often than those in the control group, and significantly more possible etiologies were found. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of symptoms and signs; laboratory, radiological, and histological results; treatment; and prognosis. The surveillance group from May to November 2022 and the control group from January 2021 to April 2022 had similar pediatric acute hepatitis epidemiology. The surveillance and control groups showed no differences in possible etiologies.
Adenoviruses were detected in many pediatric patients with acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Europe and the US from October 2021 to early 2022.14 During the COVID-19 pandemic, since early 2020, there has been no adenovirus epidemic due to social distancing; however, a serious epidemic occurred when distancing measures were lifted in 2022. A cofactor in young children with adenoviral infections causes more severe infections or immune-mediated liver damage, which is usually mild.15 However, a subsequent follow-up study concluded that the incidence of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology or LT in children in the USA will not increase significantly from 2017 to 2022.16
In Korea, similar to Europe and the USA, the incidence of adenovirus infections has been suppressed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the incidence of adenovirus infections, especially enteric adenoviruses, has increased since early 2022.17 In a 2018 Korean multicenter study of children with nonspecific reactive hepatitis, respiratory infection was the most common etiology, with 4.9% having adenovirus.4 However, despite the increase in adenovirus infections, there was no difference in the frequency of adenovirus-related hepatitis between the surveillance (13.8%) and control (8.7%) groups in our study. In contrast, in the surveillance group, the unknown-etiology subgroup showed significantly higher TB and DB levels and significantly lower WBC and platelet counts than the adenovirus or possible-etiology subgroups, despite having similar prognosis. Adenovirus, which can cause hepatitis but is not clinically severe, is a major cause of hepatitis in children, although it is difficult to draw a conclusion due to the small number of patients. This finding indicates the need for continuous monitoring of adenoviruses in pediatric patients with acute hepatitis.
Pediatric acute severe hepatitis cases reported in Korea showed overall differences in clinical symptoms and prognoses compared with those reported in Europe and the USA. In terms of clinical symptoms, jaundice (69.2%) was the most frequent, followed by vomiting (57.9%), diarrhea (41.5%), and pale stools (40.5%) in cases reported in Europe,18 whereas fever (23.1%) and respiratory symptoms (17.9%) were less frequent. In contrast, fever (68%) and respiratory symptoms, such as cough, sputum, and runny nose (17.0%), occurred frequently in Korean patients. In a European study,19 of 208 patients with complete information regarding LT, 9.6% received or were waiting for LT, while 3.8% received LT, and most showed a favorable prognosis in our surveillance group. At the time of diagnosis, direct symptoms of hepatitis, such as jaundice, are the most commonly reported in Europe. In contrast, patients who visit the hospital because of fever or cold are often accidentally diagnosed with hepatitis after a laboratory examination in Korea likely owing to the relatively low medical cost. Therefore, the symptoms and prognosis differed even though patient information was collected using the same case definition.
AAV2 is a defective DNA virus that was not previously known to cause diseases. In the UK, AAV2 was tested using next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR, and AAV2 was detected in plasma and liver samples in 26 out of 32 (81%) cases of hepatitis compared with 5 out of 74 (7%) of samples from unaffected controls.10 However, the effect of AAV2 in acute hepatitis remains unknown. In our study, 67 patients in the surveillance group were tested for AAV2 by plasma PCR, and AAV2 was confirmed in four. Three of the four patients with AAV2 were co-infected with another virus (adenovirus, enterovirus, or parainfluenza virus). One boy who underwent LT tested positive for AAV2; however, blood samples for AAV2 were obtained after LT. Therefore, it is uncertain whether AAV2 caused hepatitis. We could not test healthy controls for AAV2; therefore, we could not determine whether the AAV2 prevalence found in this study was significantly higher than that in the normal population.
We performed a subgroup analysis of the control group to eliminate bias, such as seasonal variability or differences in the study period between the two groups. Although we included the same month for the surveillance group and control subgroup, our main results were unchanged. Disease severity, presence of possible etiology, and prognosis did not differ significantly between 2021 and 2022, particularly from May to November. These results support our findings of no increase in the incidence of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in 2022 compared to that in 2021 in Korea.
Our study had some limitations. If an infectious agent is detected, it may be difficult to determine whether it is the direct cause of hepatitis. In the group whose data were retrospectively investigated in 2021, tests to determine the etiology were insufficient. Although hepatitis E virus should have been excluded to meet these criteria, we did not exclude patients without hepatitis E results. However, the prevalence of hepatitis E in Korean children is extremely low (1% in 10–14-year-olds, 0% in 15–19-year-olds),20 and it is unnecessary to assume that infection cannot be ruled out. Moreover, research on causes other than infection is lacking. Finally, the data for the control group were limited because they were collected retrospectively from the university hospitals where the researchers participated. However, there is a high probability that most of the omitted cases were mild, and the most severe cases were thought to have been reported, resulting in no significant difference in the conclusion.
This study had several strengths. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nationwide report of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Asia using several diagnostic tests, including those for adenovirus, SARS-CoV-2, and AAV2. We found no outbreaks of severe acute hepatitis of unknown etiology associated with these viruses in Korea. We compared this study population among surveillance, control, and unknown and possible etiology subgroups and found that patients with an unknown etiology had higher disease severity and poorer prognosis.
In conclusion, this was the first Korean national study to investigate the incidence, causes, and prognosis of acute pediatric hepatitis. Severe acute hepatitis due to an adenovirus outbreak in the UK and USA was not observed in Korea. Pediatric acute hepatitis has a relatively fair prognosis; however, many cases of unknown etiology show high disease severity and poor prognosis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank all the doctors who participated in our surveillance system, especially Dr. Jung Ok Shim at Korea University Guro Hospital and Dr. Byung-Ho Choe at Kyungpook National University. We would also like to thank the KDCA for supporting this system.

Notes

Funding: This study was conducted with research funding from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (Grant number 2022-07-011).

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Lee YJ, Lee KJ, Ko JS.

  • Data curation: Lee YJ, Lee KJ, Shon S, Lim JG, Kim YJ.

  • Formal analysis: Lee YJ, Lee KJ.

  • Funding acquisition: Ko JS.

  • Investigation: Park KY, Kang KS, Lee JS, Hong J, Kim SH, Lee Y, Kang B, Kim YB, Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Oh SH, Park S, Methodology.

  • Writing - original draft: Lee KJ.

  • Writing - review & editing: Lee JY.

References

1. Jang M, Oh MS, Oh SC, Kang KS. Distribution of diseases causing liver function test abnormality in children and natural recovery time of the abnormal liver function. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(11):1784–1789. PMID: 27709857.
crossref
2. Chan HL, Kwan AC, To KF, Lai ST, Chan PK, Leung WK, et al. Clinical significance of hepatic derangement in severe acute respiratory syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11(14):2148–2153. PMID: 15810082.
crossref
3. Eisenhut M, Thorburn K, Ahmed T. Transaminase levels in ventilated children with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30(5):931–934. PMID: 15024569.
crossref
4. Lee Y, Yi DY, Lee YM, Choi SY, Choi YJ, Lee KJ. A multicenter study of real-world practice for management of abnormal liver function tests in children with acute infectious diseases. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(47):e310. PMID: 34873882.
crossref
5. World Health Organization. Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Aetiology–the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2022.
6. World Health Organization. Multi-Country – Acute, Severe Hepatitis of Unknown Origin in Children. Disease Outbreak News. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2022.
7. UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children in England, technical briefing 2. Updated 2022. Accessed May 7, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1073704/acute-hepatitis-technical-briefing-2.pdf .
8. Baker JM, Buchfellner M, Britt W, Sanchez V, Potter JL, Ingram LA, et al. Acute hepatitis and adenovirus infection among children - Alabama, October 2021-February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71(18):638–640. PMID: 35511732.
crossref
9. Ho A, Orton R, Tayler R, Asamaphan P, Herder V, Davis C, et al. Adeno-associated virus 2 infection in children with non-A-E hepatitis. Nature. 2023; 617(7961):555–563. PMID: 36996873.
crossref
10. UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children in England. Technical briefing 3. Updated 2022. Accessed May 19, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1077027/acute-hepatitis-technical-briefing_3.pdf .
11. Schaberg KB, Kambham N, Sibley RK, Higgins JP. Adenovirus hepatitis: clinicopathologic analysis of 12 consecutive cases from a single institution. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017; 41(6):810–819. PMID: 28296681.
12. Squires RH Jr, Shneider BL, Bucuvalas J, Alonso E, Sokol RJ, Narkewicz MR, et al. Acute liver failure in children: the first 348 patients in the pediatric acute liver failure study group. J Pediatr. 2006; 148(5):652–658. PMID: 16737880.
crossref
13. World Health Organization. Laboratory Testing for Severe Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Aetiology in Children: Interim Guidance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2022.
14. Cates J, Baker JM, Almendares O, Kambhampati AK, Burke RM, Balachandran N, et al. Interim analysis of acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in children aged <10 years - United States, October 2021–June 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71(26):852–858. PMID: 35771734.
15. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Increase in Severe Acute Hepatitis Cases of Unknown Aetiology in Children. Solna, Sweden: ECDC;2022.
16. Kambhampati AK, Burke RM, Dietz S, Sheppard M, Almendares O, Baker JM, et al. Trends in acute hepatitis of unspecified etiology and adenovirus stool testing results in children - United States, 2017–2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71(24):797–802. PMID: 35709071.
17. Kim KR, Won J, Kim H, Kim BI, Kim MJ, Kim JY, et al. The changes in respiratory and enteric adenovirus epidemiology in Korea from 2017 to June 2022. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(9):e71. PMID: 36880111.
crossref
18. UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children in England, technical briefing 4. Updated 2022. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1094573/acute-hepatitis-technical-briefing-4.pdf .
19. Romaní Vidal A, Vaughan A, Innocenti F, Colombe S, Nerlander L, Rachwal N, et al. Hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children - epidemiological overview of cases reported in Europe, 1 January to 16 June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022; 27(31):2200483. PMID: 35929429.
crossref
20. Yun H, Lee HJ, Cheon D, Chu C, Oh KW, Kim YT, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis A and E viruses based on the third Korea national health and nutrition survey in Korea. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2011; 2(1):46–50. PMID: 24159450.
crossref

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table 1

Major symptoms and signs of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea
jkms-38-e401-s001.doc

Supplementary Table 2

Treatment and prognosis of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea
jkms-38-e401-s002.doc

Supplementary Table 3

Laboratory tests and prognosis according to the etiology subgroups in pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in Korea
jkms-38-e401-s003.doc

Supplementary Table 4

The results of the laboratory tests for pediatric acute hepatitis in Korea by unknown, possible etiology, and adenovirus subgroups
jkms-38-e401-s004.doc
TOOLS
Similar articles