Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.17(4) > 1516083809

Lee, Kwon, and Kim: Importance-performance analysis of sodium reduction practices by school nutrition teachers and dietitians in the Republic of Korea

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the importance and performance level of sodium reduction practices in school meal service by school nutrition teachers and dietitians, and compared them according to school level and placement of the school nutrition teacher.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

An online survey was conducted with 608 nutrition teachers and dietitians in schools in the Republic of Korea from September 28 to November 12, 2021 (response rate: 57%). The questionnaire comprised 11 items related to sodium reduction practices (purchasing, food preparation and serving, and education). The importance and performance level of each item was rated on a 5-point scale. The mean differences were analyzed using t-tests or one-way analyses of variance and Duncan’s post-hoc tests. An importance-performance analysis was performed on sodium reduction practices.

RESULTS

Participating in sodium reduction education, sodium reduction education for cooks, and sodium reduction education for students were assessed to have high importance but low performance. Overall, the higher the school level, the lower was the importance level of sodium reduction practices. The performance in kindergartens and elementary schools was higher than that in middle and high schools. The importance in the purchasing category perceived by dietitians was lower as compared to nutrition teachers. In addition, the performance in the purchasing, food preparation and serving, and education categories perceived by dietitians was lower than those of nutrition teachers.

CONCLUSION

Sodium reduction education for nutrition teachers and dietitians, cooks, and students should prioritize practicing sodium reduction in school meal service. Specific guidelines for managing sodium reduction at all stages—purchasing, food preparation, and serving—should also be developed. The results could be used as basic data to reduce the sodium content in school meals.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of a school meal service is to provide well-balanced nutrition to promote the growth, development, and proper dietary habits in students. As of February 2022, 11,976 schools in the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as Korea) served at least one meal per day to 5.34 million students. Additionally, 6,277 nutrition teachers had been assigned to 57.4% of 10,712 schools with on-site meal service facilities [1]. The full implementation of the school meal service has been in place since 2003 in Korea, with some schools providing breakfast and dinner in addition to lunch.
The school meal service has a considerable impact on the growth and health of students. The school meals provided over one-third of the Dietary Reference Intakes for Korean (KDRIs) for energy, protein, vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, and iron [2]. The meals offered in all-girls high schools in Gyeonggi-do yielded 820.4 kcal of energy (41.0% of KDRIs), 31.8 g of protein, 289.5 mg of calcium, and 4.4 mg of iron per day, on average [3].
Based on a 2013 study on the reduction of sodium in school meals conducted by the Ministry of Education [2], the target sodium level per school meal was set to 900, 1,000, and 1,300 mg for elementary, middle, and high school students, respectively. The recommended salt content in soups and stews was set to 0.6% and 0.7% for elementary/middle and high school students, respectively. However, the salt content provided in school meals is high [45], and in particular, sodium content was relatively high in one-dish meals or noodles [467]. In middle schools in the Gyeongbuk region, an average sodium amount of 1,736.02 mg/meal was served, while the salt content in soups and stew was 0.69–0.80%, which exceeded the level recommended by the Ministry of Education (0.6%) [5]. Among meals served in elementary/middle and high schools, the sodium content of one-dish meals was 245 and 278 mg, respectively, while that in noodles was 319 and 291 mg, respectively, at least 8–13 times higher than in regular cooked rice [4].
Excessive sodium intake is associated with various diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and gastric cancer [89], and various studies have reported that higher sodium intake can increase the excretion of calcium through urine, thereby adversely affecting skeletal health [10111213]. Furthermore, excessive sodium intake can negatively affect reproductive health [14]. Therefore, school-aged children should be encouraged to avoid excessive sodium intake and nurture proper dietary habits.
As Korean school-aged children eat at least one meal from the school meal service and consume high levels of sodium in school meals, it is necessary to reduce the sodium content in school meal service to achieve sodium reduction in the diets of Korean school-aged children. Although the Enforcement Rule of the School Meals Act [15] stipulates that “salt, oils and fats, simple sugars, or food additives should not be used in excessive amount,” specific criteria for sodium reduction are lacking. According to the basic direction of school meal service, schools are recommended to establish their own sodium reduction plans and incorporate low-sodium diets, use a salt meter, implement meal-without-soup days, manage appropriate salt level in soups (0.6–0.7%), and conduct sodium-related education [16].
To reduce sodium, the practices of seasoning soup or stew at the end of cooking or blanching processed meat products such as ham to remove excessive sodium have been implemented [17]. Nearly two-thirds (62.7%) of school nutrition teachers and dietitians in Gyeonggi-do used a salt meter to check the sodium content of soups and stews [18], and 77.4% of schools in the Daegu area served low-sodium meals [19]. Although nutrition teachers and dietitians perceived the importance of reducing the sodium content in school meals [2021], the actual on-site practice of sodium reduction was, nonetheless, not satisfactory.
Numerous studies have been conducted on the practice of sodium reduction in school meal service at the local and regional levels [171819]; however, nationwide research on the status of sodium reduction in school meal service is still lacking. The literature [1718] has focused on ways to reduce sodium primarily in the cooking process. We could not find any investigations on the importance and performance of sodium reduction practices in purchasing, food preparation, serving, and education stage.
This study examined the importance and performance level of sodium reduction practices in purchasing, food preparation, serving, and education for school meal service, as perceived by nutrition teachers and dietitians in kindergartens, elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools in nationwide level. It also analyzed the differences according to school level and placement of the nutrition teacher in providing basic data for sodium reduction in school meals.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Participants

Among the 11,082 kindergarten, elementary, middle, and high schools utilizing the NEIS (National Education Information System) meal service system, approximately 10% (n = 1,068) of schools were selected for this study through proportional stratified quota sampling, considering school level (kindergarten, elementary, middle, and high schools), foodservice type (urban, agri-fishery town, and remote island and country), and region (17 cities and provinces). An online survey was conducted among nutrition teachers and dietitians in the selected schools using questionnaires (n = 608, response rate: 57%). All participants provided informed consent, and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kongju National University (approval number: KNU_IRB_2021-103). The survey was conducted between September 28 and November 12, 2021.

Development of the questionnaire

The questionnaire comprised 11 items related to sodium reduction practice and 13 items concerning participants’ general characteristics, including sex and age, and general characteristics of the schools, such as school type and foodservice type. For the items related to sodium reduction practice, three items about purchasing, five items about food preparation and serving, and three items about education were included based on previous studies [222]. The importance and performance level of each item was measured on a 5-point scale (1 = not important at all/never perform to 5 = very important/always perform). The content validity, clarity, and conciseness of the measurement items were verified with five nutrition teachers.

The importance-performance analysis (IPA) method

This study adopted IPA as the methodological approach to determine the priorities of the factors to be improved in sodium reduction practices. The IPA technique is a basic diagnostic decision tool [23] that facilitates the identification of improvement prioritization [24]. Attributes are compared or classified according to the relative importance and performance ratings. The IPA technique is also categorized into quality attributes in an IPA grid [25], which gives a typology that classifies importance and performance on a scale of low or high into four categories: 1) concentrate here (high importance and low performance), 2) keep up the good work (high importance and high performance), 3) low priority (low importance and low performance), and 4) possible overkill (low importance and high performance).
The IPA has been used in hospitality and tourism research for years since the seminal work by Martilla and James [25]. IPAs are also used as tools to evaluate the importance and performance of the task of dietitians in public health nutrition areas [26] and of sanitation management of cooks in childcare centers [27].

Data analysis

The results were analyzed using SPSS Package Program (version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All data were compared according to school level and placement of nutrition teacher. Significant differences in distribution were tested by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, while the mean difference was tested by t-test or one-way analysis of variance and Duncan’s post-hoc test. Statistical significance was set at < 0.05. An IPA was performed on sodium reduction measures and the difference between importance and performance was tested by paired t-test. For an IPA grid analysis of the importance and performance of sodium reduction practices, the importance of 11 items of sodium reduction practices was put on the x-axis and the performance on the y-axis. Coordinates (x, y) for each item were marked with a dot, and the mean value of importance was set as a reference value of the x-axis while that of performance was set as a reference value on the y-axis for the 2 groups: low and high scores.

RESULTS

General characteristics

Table 1 presents the general characteristics of 608 participants from 608 schools (25 kindergartens, 323 elementary schools, 136 middle schools, and 124 high schools). Most participants were female (98.8%), with no significant difference in sex between school levels. The mean age of the participants was 43.4 years; those working in elementary (45.9 years) and middle (43.0 years) schools were significantly older than those working in kindergartens (37.0 years) and high schools (38.4 years; P < 0.05). The mean total work experience as nutrition teachers and dietitians was 16.0 years, appearing in the order of elementary school (18.7 years), middle school (14.8 years), high school (11.8 years), and kindergarten (8.3 years; P < 0.05). The overall placement rate of nutrition teachers was 57.7%, with the highest rate in elementary schools (76.5%) and lowest rate in kindergartens (4.0%; P < 0.001). Nutrition teachers (44.9 years) were older than dietitians (41.4 years; P < 0.001) and had longer work experience (P < 0.001). Most nutrition teachers (70.4%) were assigned to elementary schools, thus indicating a difference from dietitians (P < 0.001).
Table 1

General characteristics of the respondents

nrp-17-812-i001
Characteristics Total (n = 608) School level Placement of nutrition teacher
Kindergarten (n = 25) Elementary school (n = 323) Middle school (n = 136) High school (n = 124) P-value1) Nutrition teacher (n = 351) Dietitian (n = 257) P-value1)
Sex 0.640 0.248
Male 7 (1.2) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.5) 2 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 6 (1.7) 1 (0.4)
Female 601 (98.8) 25 (100.0) 318 (98.5) 134 (98.5) 124 (100.0) 345 (98.3) 256 (99.6)
Age (yrs) 43.38 ± 9.35 37.00 ± 8.96a 45.93 ± 7.79b 43.01 ± 9.52b 38.44 ± 10.35a < 0.001 44.85 ± 9.34 41.38 ± 9.00 < 0.001
Years of working 15.98 ± 9.05 8.28 ± 6.35a 18.66 ± 8.82d 14.83 ± 8.11c 11.81 ± 8.41b < 0.001 18.64 ± 9.80 12.34 ± 6.33 < 0.001
Educational level < 0.001 < 0.001
College 26 (4.3) 3 (12.0) 4 (1.2) 8 (5.9) 11 (8.9) 3 (0.8) 23 (8.9)
University 294 (48.3) 8 (32.0) 179 (55.4) 57 (41.9) 50 (40.3) 200 (57.0) 94 (36.6)
Graduate school 288 (47.4) 14 (56.0) 140 (43.4) 71 (52.2) 63 (50.8) 148 (42.2) 140 (54.5)
Placement of nutrition teacher < 0.001 -
Nutrition teacher 351 (57.7) 1 (4.0) 247 (76.5) 53 (39.0) 50 (40.3) - -
Dietitian 257 (42.3) 24 (96.0) 76 (23.5) 83 (61.0) 74 (59.7) - -
School level - < 0.001
Kindergarten 25 (4.1) - - - - 1 (0.3) 24 (9.3)
Elementary school 323 (53.1) - - - - 247 (70.4) 76 (29.6)
Middle school 136 (22.4) - - - - 53 (15.1) 83 (32.3)
High school 124 (20.4) - - - - 50 (14.2) 74 (28.8)
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.
1)P-value by χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, analysis of variance, or t-test.
a-dValues in the same row with different superscripted letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 using analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 2 presents the general characteristics of the 608 schools included in the study. Concerning foodservice type, the results showed 67.9%, 28.0%, and 4.1% for urban, agri-fishery town, and remote island and country types, respectively, demonstrating no significant difference between school levels. Overall, public schools accounted for the highest percentage with 84.4%, and all the kindergartens included in the study were public schools. The percentage of public schools was relatively higher among elementary schools (96.6%), as compared to middle schools (77.2%) and high schools (57.3%; P < 0.001). Concerning the foodservice system, a conventional system accounted for the highest proportion (89.8%), while the percentage of commissary type was relatively high among high schools (16.1%; P = 0.007). Regarding the eating place, most schools had cafeterias (87.2%). There were significant differences according to school level, with the lower school level showing a relatively higher percentage of classroom service type (P = 0.003). Based on lunch service, the number of students served exceeded 500 in elementary, middle, and high schools, which was higher than that in kindergartens (P < 0.05); whereas, the number of meals served per day was the highest in high schools, corresponding to 1.93 meals (P < 0.05).
Table 2

General characteristics of the subject schools

nrp-17-812-i002
Characteristics Total (n = 608) School level Placement of nutrition teacher
Kindergarten (n = 25) Elementary school (n = 323) Middle school (n = 136) High school (n = 124) P-value1) Nutrition teacher (n = 351) Dietitian (n = 257) P-value1)
Foodservice type 0.081 0.600
Urban 413 (67.9) 20 (80.0) 203 (62.9) 96 (70.6) 94 (75.8) 235 (67.0) 178 (69.2)
Agri-fishery town 170 (28.0) 5 (20.0) 105 (32.5) 36 (26.5) 24 (19.4) 103 (29.3) 67 (26.1)
Remote island and country 25 (4.1) 0 (0.0) 15 (4.6) 4 (2.9) 6 (4.8) 13 (3.7) 12 (4.7)
School type < 0.001 < 0.001
National 24 (3.9) 0 (0) 10 (3.1) 6 (4.4) 8 (6.4) 15 (4.3) 9 (3.5)
Public 513 (84.4) 25 (100.0) 312 (96.6) 105 (77.2) 71 (57.3) 322 (91.7) 191 (74.3)
Private 71 (11.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 25 (18.4) 45 (36.3) 14 (4.0) 57 (22.2)
Foodservice system 0.007 0.158
Conventional 546 (89.8) 24 (96.0) 287 (88.9) 131 (96.3) 104 (83.9) 310 (88.3) 236 (91.8)
Commissary 62 (10.2) 1 (4.0) 36 (11.1) 5 (3.7) 20 (16.1) 41 (11.7) 21 (8.2)
Eating place 0.003 0.161
Cafeteria 530 (87.2) 20 (80.0) 269 (83.3) 122 (89.7) 119 (96.0) 299 (85.2) 231 (89.9)
Classroom 56 (9.2) 4 (16.0) 40 (12.4) 10 (7.4) 2 (1.6) 39 (11.1) 17 (6.6)
Cafeteria+Classroom 22 (3.6) 1 (4.0) 14 (4.3) 4 (2.9) 3 (2.4) 13 (3.7) 9 (3.5)
No. of meals (lunch) 513.04 ± 404.32 196.24 ± 87.01a 500.79 ± 445.25b 515.95 ± 337.78b 605.64 ± 362.76b < 0.001 555.47 ± 435.51 455.10 ± 349.94 0.002
No. of meals / day
1 meal 531 (87.3) 23 (92.0) 323 (100.0) 131 (96.3) 54 (43.5) < 0.001 317 (90.3) 214 (83.3) 0.035
2 meals 28 (4.6) 2 (8.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7) 25 (20.2) 12 (3.4) 16 (6.2)
3 meals 49 (8.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (3.0) 45 (36.3) 22 (6.3) 27 (10.5)
Mean 1.21 ± 0.57 1.08 ± 0.28a 1.00 ± 0.00a 1.07 ± 0.35a 1.93 ± 0.89b < 0.001 1.16 ± 0.51 1.27 ± 0.64 0.020
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SD.
1)P-value by χ2 test, analysis of variance or t-test.
a,bValues in the same row with different superscripted letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 using analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test.
Concerning differences according to placement of nutrition teacher, most nutrition teachers (91.7%) were working in public schools, thereby indicating a difference from dietitians (P < 0.001). Based on the lunch service, the number of students served was higher in schools with a nutrition teacher with 555 students (P = 0.002), while the number of meals served per day was higher in schools with a dietitian (1.27 meals) than in schools with a nutrition teacher (1.16 meals; P = 0.020).

Importance-performance regarding sodium reduction practice

Table 3 presents the results on the importance and performance of various sodium reduction measures. Overall, “using a salt meter during food preparation” (4.25 points) had the highest importance score, followed in order by “sodium reduction education for students” (4.13 points) and “sodium reduction education for cooks” (4.04 points). Moreover, “purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling” had the lowest importance score with 3.62 points. Additionally, “serving precise portions” (3.72 points) and “indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes” (3.73 points) had relatively low importance.
Table 3

Importance and performance levels of sodium reduction practices

nrp-17-812-i003
Items Importance Performance P-value1)
Purchasing
Purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling 3.62 ± 0.772) 3.14 ± 0.822) < 0.001
Using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning 4.03 ± 0.77 3.77 ± 0.83 < 0.001
Reducing the use of processed or frozen foods 3.97 ± 0.78 3.71 ± 0.74 < 0.001
Mean 3.87 ± 0.62 3.53 ± 0.62 < 0.001
Food preparation and serving
Indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes 3.73 ± 0.83 3.63 ± 0.85 0.006
Using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation 3.85 ± 0.82 3.50 ± 0.89 < 0.001
Using a salt meter during food preparation 4.25 ± 0.73 4.32 ± 0.74 0.012
Practicing low-sodium food preparation methods 3.85 ± 0.72 3.45 ± 0.76 < 0.001
Serving precise portions 3.72 ± 0.83 3.63 ± 0.72 0.003
Mean 3.88 ± 0.60 3.70 ± 0.54 < 0.001
Education
Participating in sodium reduction education 3.94 ± 0.76 3.51 ± 0.74 < 0.001
Sodium reduction education for cooks 4.04 ± 0.78 3.56 ± 0.77 < 0.001
Sodium reduction education for students 4.13 ± 0.73 3.52 ± 0.78 < 0.001
Mean 4.04 ± 0.69 3.53 ± 0.68 < 0.001
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
1)P-value by paired t-test, 2)5-point scale (1 = not important at all/never perform to 5 = very important/always perform).
Concerning performance, “using a salt meter during food preparation” (4.32 points) had the highest performance score, followed in order by “using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning” (3.77 points) and “reducing the use of processed or frozen foods” (3.71 points). “Purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling” had the lowest performance score with 3.14 points.
In the comparison of importance and performance, the mean importance scores were higher than mean performance scores in all categories: purchasing (P < 0.001), food preparation and serving (P < 0.001), and education (P < 0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences between importance and performance for all items. For all items except “using a salt meter during food preparation,” the importance scores were significantly higher than the performance scores, whereas for “using a salt meter during food preparation,” the performance score (4.32 points) was significantly higher than the importance score (4.25 points; P = 0.012).
Fig. 1 illustrates the IPA results. “Using a salt meter during food preparation” was assessed to have the highest importance and performance. “Using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning” and “reducing the use of processed or frozen foods” had high importance and performance scores as well. These three attributes were classified as “keep up the good work” that should be maintained. “Purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling” was assessed to have the lowest importance and performance (“low priority”), which did not require greater effort than that currently expended. “Using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation” and “practicing low-sodium food preparation methods” were also classified in this quadrant. Contrastingly, “participating in sodium reduction education,” “sodium reduction education for cooks,” and “sodium reduction education for students” were assessed to have high importance but low performance. These attributes were classified into the “concentrate here” quadrant, thus indicating areas that need urgent improvement. Therefore, there is a need to focus on improving the performance level on these attributes.
Fig. 1

Importance-Performance Analysis Grid about sodium reduction practices.

nrp-17-812-g001

Differences in importance and performance according to school level

Table 4 presents the analysis results of the differences in importance and performance according to school level. The results showed significant differences in importance scores in “using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning” (P = 0.002), “reducing the use of processed or frozen foods” (P = 0.002), “using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation” (P = 0.047), and “sodium reduction education for cooks” (P = 0.018), which were assessed higher in lower school levels. There were significant differences in all items in performance scores according to school level except “indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes,” “using a salt meter during food preparation,” and “serving precise portions.” Overall, the performance in kindergartens and elementary schools was higher than that in middle and high schools.
Table 4

Importance and performance levels of sodium reduction practices according to school level

nrp-17-812-i004
Items Importance Performance
Kindergarten (n = 25) Elementary school (n = 323) Middle school (n = 136) High school (n = 124) P-value1) Kindergarten (n = 25) Elementary school (n = 323) Middle school (n = 136) High school (n = 124) P-value1)
Purchasing
Purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling 3.56 ± 0.652) 3.66 ± 0.80 3.60 ± 0.69 3.56 ± 0.80 0.620 3.20 ± 0.87ab2) 3.23 ± 0.80b 3.10 ± 0.79ab 2.93 ± 0.85a 0.006
Using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning 4.00 ± 0.71ab 4.14 ± 0.76b 3.97 ± 0.76ab 3.84 ± 0.79a 0.002 3.80 ± 0.82bc 3.94 ± 0.79c 3.60 ± 0.85ab 3.51 ± 0.83a < 0.001
Reducing the use of processed or frozen foods 3.96 ± 0.89ab 4.06 ± 0.73b 3.94 ± 0.81ab 3.75 ± 0.82a 0.002 3.80 ± 0.76b 3.88 ± 0.68b 3.55 ± 0.72a 3.40 ± 0.75a < 0.001
Mean 3.84 ± 0.59ab 3.95 ± 0.60b 3.84 ± 0.57ab 3.72 ± 0.69a 0.003 3.60 ± 0.63bc 3.68 ± 0.56c 3.42 ± 0.63ab 3.28 ± 0.64a < 0.001
Food preparation and serving
Indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes 3.52 ± 0.59 3.80 ± 0.83 3.70 ± 0.81 3.62 ± 0.86 0.085 3.68 ± 0.95 3.71 ± 0.80 3.54 ± 0.90 3.53 ± 0.88 0.105
Using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation 3.68 ± 0.80 3.93 ± 0.81 3.77 ± 0.83 3.73 ± 0.84 0.047 3.16 ± 0.99a 3.59 ± 0.83b 3.46 ± 0.95ab 3.35 ± 0.94ab 0.013
Using a salt meter during food preparation 4.20 ± 0.71 4.30 ± 0.71 4.21 ± 0.71 4.15 ± 0.79 0.211 4.48 ± 0.59 4.34 ± 0.70 4.29 ± 0.80 4.25 ± 0.81 0.417
Practicing low-sodium food preparation methods 3.80 ± 0.91 3.92 ± 0.71 3.78 ± 0.69 3.76 ± 0.71 0.100 3.64 ± 0.81c 3.56 ± 0.75bc 3.32 ± 0.75ab 3.27 ± 0.74a < 0.001
Serving precise portions 3.76 ± 0.88 3.67 ± 0.85 3.77 ± 0.80 3.79 ± 0.79 0.490 3.68 ± 0.90 3.63 ± 0.73 3.63 ± 0.72 3.62 ± 0.68 0.985
Mean 3.79 ± 0.57 3.93 ± 0.59 3.85 ± 0.59 3.81 ± 0.64 0.211 3.73 ± 0.54 3.77 ± 0.51 3.65 ± 0.60 3.60 ± 0.55 0.019
Education
Participating in sodium reduction education 4.00 ± 0.82 3.97 ± 0.75 3.88 ± 0.75 3.90 ± 0.77 0.585 3.56 ± 0.71 3.59 ± 0.77 3.43 ± 0.69 3.40 ± 0.72 0.044
Sodium reduction education for cooks 4.20 ± 0.76b 4.12 ± 0.77ab 3.89 ± 0.78a 3.98 ± 0.78ab 0.018 3.72 ± 0.74b 3.65 ± 0.76ab 3.40 ± 0.74a 3.44 ± 0.78a 0.002
Sodium reduction education for students 4.12 ± 0.83 4.20 ± 0.68 4.04 ± 0.75 4.06 ± 0.79 0.110 3.32 ± 0.56a 3.62 ± 0.76b 3.50 ± 0.77ab 3.32 ± 0.84a 0.002
Mean 4.11 ± 0.78 4.10 ± 0.66 3.94 ± 0.71 3.98 ± 0.73 0.101 3.53 ± 0.59 3.62 ± 0.67 3.45 ± 0.66 3.38 ± 0.69 0.003
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
1)P-value by analysis of variance, 2)5-point scale (1 = not important at all/never perform to 5 = very important/always perform).
a-cValues in the same row with different superscripted letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 using analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test.

Differences in importance and performance according to placement of the nutrition teacher

Table 5 presents the analysis results of the differences in importance and performance according to placement of nutrition teacher. In the purchasing category, nutrition teachers assessed “using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning” (P = 0.001) and “reducing the use of processed or frozen foods” (P = 0.007) as having higher importance, as compared with dietitians. The mean importance score in the purchasing category was also significantly higher among nutrition teachers (3.93 points) than among dietitians (3.80 points; P = 0.006). In the food preparation and serving category, there were no significant differences between the mean importance scores of the 2 groups; however, the importance score for “practicing low-sodium food preparation methods” was higher among nutrition teachers (3.90 points) than among dietitians (3.78 points; P = 0.038). In the education category, there were no significant differences in importance scores between the 2 groups.
Table 5

Importance and performance levels of sodium reduction practices according to placement of nutrition teacher

nrp-17-812-i005
Items Importance Performance
Nutrition teacher (n = 351) Dietitian (n = 257) P-value1) Nutrition teacher (n = 351) Dietitian (n = 257) P-value1)
Purchasing
Purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling 3.64 ± 0.812) 3.60 ± 0.71 0.538 3.19 ± 0.852) 3.07 ± 0.77 0.082
Using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning 4.12 ± 0.77 3.92 ± 0.75 0.001 3.87 ± 0.83 3.63 ± 0.80 0.001
Reducing the use of processed or frozen foods 4.04 ± 0.79 3.87 ± 0.76 0.007 3.83 ± 0.74 3.53 ± 0.70 < 0.001
Mean 3.93 ± 0.63 3.80 ± 0.59 0.006 3.63 ± 0.63 3.41 ± 0.57 < 0.001
Food preparation and serving
Indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes 3.76 ± 0.89 3.70 ± 0.74 0.354 3.71 ± 0.87 3.53 ± 0.82 0.007
Using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation 3.90 ± 0.89 3.77 ± 0.72 0.055 3.61 ± 0.90 3.34 ± 0.86 < 0.001
Using a salt meter during food preparation 4.26 ± 0.79 4.22 ± 0.65 0.420 4.32 ± 0.75 4.31 ± 0.73 0.862
Practicing low-sodium food preparation methods 3.90 ± 0.73 3.78 ± 0.70 0.038 3.51 ± 0.79 3.36 ± 0.72 0.018
Serving precise portions 3.69 ± 0.88 3.77 ± 0.76 0.266 3.65 ± 0.76 3.60 ± 0.67 0.463
Mean 3.90 ± 0.65 3.85 ± 0.53 0.232 3.76 ± 0.56 3.63 ± 0.52 0.003
Education
Participating in sodium reduction education 3.95 ± 0.79 3.92 ± 0.71 0.594 3.61 ± 0.79 3.38 ± 0.66 < 0.001
Sodium reduction education for cooks 4.08 ± 0.82 4.00 ± 0.71 0.196 3.62 ± 0.82 3.47 ± 0.68 0.012
Sodium reduction education for students 4.18 ± 0.76 4.07 ± 0.68 0.073 3.61 ± 0.81 3.40 ± 0.72 0.001
Mean 4.07 ± 0.72 3.99 ± 0.65 0.196 3.61 ± 0.72 3.42 ± 0.60 < 0.001
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
1)P-value by t-test, 2)5-point scale (1 = not important at all/never perform to 5 = very important/always perform).
Concerning performance, nutrition teachers had higher performance scores than dietitians in all categories: purchasing (P < 0.001), food preparation and serving (P = 0.003), and education (P < 0.001). Nutrition teachers had higher performance scores for “using natural ingredients and reducing the use of seasoning” (P = 0.001) and “reducing the use of processed or frozen foods” (P < 0.001) in the purchasing category; and “indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes” (P = 0.007), “using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation” (P < 0.001), and “practicing low-sodium food preparation methods” (P = 0.018) in the food preparation and serving category. In the education category, nutrition teachers had significantly higher performance scores for “participating in sodium reduction education” (P < 0.001), “sodium reduction education for cooks” (P = 0.012), and “sodium reduction education for students” (P = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Managing the sodium content in school meal service could be an effective strategy to reduce sodium intake and contribute to healthy dietary habits during childhood. Among the measures for sodium reduction in school meal service in this study, using a salt meter during food preparation revealed the highest importance and performance scores. According to previous studies [1928], most schools used a salt meter, which is consistent with the current results. As the purpose of the salt meter is to check the final salt content in cooked foods, accurately planning the amount of salt or seasoning in standard recipes using scientific calculation and accurately measuring them are of primary importance to reduce sodium intake. However, the importance of salt planning through standard recipes, which is the starting point for systematic salt content management, was perceived at a low level. Kim et al. [19] reported that the importance scores of planning meals considering sodium content and planning meals using natural ingredients instead of processed products were below average, which is consistent with the current results. These results indicate that education on sodium reduction practices for nutrition teachers and dietitians should include specific methods for menu planning.
The importance of serving precise portions was perceived at a low level as well, even as it could ensure the consumption of planned amount of sodium. In a study conducted in middle schools in the USA, the actual portion sizes of menu items served as school meals ranged between 67% and 203% of the planned portion sizes [29]. As increase in a portion size is associated with increased amounts of food and energy intake [3031], cooks should be trained to serve the precise portions planned in the recipes.
Items such as purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content in nutrition labeling, using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation, and following low-sodium food preparation methods had low importance and performance scores in this study. In Lee’s study [21], 90.5% of nutrition teachers and dietitians who participated in the survey said that they did not use low-sodium products because of lack of information, high price, or lack of product diversity. These results suggest the necessity of development and promotion of various low-sodium products.
Measuring seasonings during food preparation and using low-sodium food preparation methods are also important. A study on restaurant staff in Korea reported that related education increased the likelihood of measuring seasonings and maintaining sodium reduction [22]. In a similar study, the sodium content of foods decreased after low-sodium cooking training intervention [32]. Based on these findings, it is necessary to provide education on the importance of sodium reduction measures not only in the purchasing stage but also in the food preparation stage, such as measuring seasonings and practicing low-sodium food preparation methods.
The IPA results showed that “participating in sodium reduction education,” “sodium reduction education for cooks,” and “sodium reduction education for students” had high importance scores but low performance scores, thus indicating the need for improving these aspects first. According to a previous study, the percentage of nutrition teachers and dietitians who participated in education on sodium reduction was low [2133]. In Lee’s study [18], 87.5% of nutrition teachers and dietitians reported that sodium reduction education was helpful. Further, more than half of nutrition teachers and dietitians responded that specific guidelines were necessary (57.2%) to achieve policy goals about low-sodium school meals. Therefore, opportunities for related education for nutrition teachers and dietitians should be expanded by including information on how to reduce sodium in all stages of school meal service.
Many studies have demonstrated that well-planned nutrition education can have a significant impact on the quality of nutrition knowledge among children and adolescents [34353637383940]. Lee [18] reported that sodium reduction education for students was mostly conducted through passive methods such as home communication (38.9%), school website (37.9%), and cafeteria bulletin board (12.1%). The educational effect for students may be augmented through various forms of learning such as classes, cooking, and experiences.
The importance scores for “using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation,” “using natural ingredients and reducing use of seasoning,” “reducing use of processed and frozen foods,” and “sodium reduction education for cooks” were lower as the school level increased. The performance scores were also generally lower among middle and high schools than among kindergartens and elementary schools. Previous studies have also reported that sodium reduction practices by nutrition teachers and dietitians decreased with an increase in the school level [1941], which is consistent with the current results. It is probably because the number of schools that serve 2 or 3 meals per day rises as the school level increases, which contribute to the workload. As the school level increases, processed foods are used more frequently to alleviate the workloads, which might have influenced the decrease in performance scores for sodium reduction.
In comparison with natural foods, processed foods contain higher sodium content owing to the addition of salt, preservatives, and chemical seasonings [42]. Lee [19] reported that the frequency of using processed foods in school meal service increased as the school level increased. Lee [43] further demonstrated that the percentages of the sodium intake from processed foods in school meals were high at 36–40% in middle and high schools. Education on sodium reduction should be prioritized for nutrition teachers and dietitians at the middle and high school levels.
Dietitians had lower importance scores than nutrition teachers in three items and lower performance scores than nutrition teachers in eight items. Since the enactment of Chapter 2 Article 7, “Placement of Nutrition Teacher” in the School Meals Act [44] implemented in 2006, the employees in charge of school meal service in Korea have been differentiated as nutrition teachers and dietitians. According to a study investigating the job performance of nutrition teachers and dietitians in the Daejeon and Chungnam areas, dietitians showed lower performance than nutrition teachers in 13 out of 23 items for school meal production [45]. This difference in job performance between nutrition teachers and dietitians can be viewed in the same context as that in the performance of sodium reduction found in this study. Education opportunities for nutrition teachers and dietitians were limited [33] and dietitians reportedly participated in training program less frequently than nutrition teachers [46]. Therefore, the customized education program, especially for school dietitians, should be applied and placement of nutrition teachers should be expanded in a long-term strategy.
In conclusion, sodium reduction education for nutrition teachers and dietitians, cooks, and students should be given priority to practice sodium reduction in school meal service. Various educational materials for sodium reduction should be developed and opportunities for diverse forms of learning, including extra-curricular activities such as cooking classes, should be provided. Especially, education programs for dietitians in middle and high schools should be implemented at the local level.
Specific guidelines for the management of sodium reduction at all stages—purchasing, food preparation, and serving—should be also developed. In particular, items such as purchasing food ingredients by comparing the sodium content on the nutrition labeling, using the measured amount of seasoning during food preparation, and practicing low-sodium food preparation methods with low performance level need to be included in the guidelines. In addition, it is necessary to emphasize the importance of items such as indicating the amount of seasoning in standard recipes and serving precise portions, which are perceived as low in importance, in the guidelines.
This study had a limitation. It used IPA to identity relative importance level in sodium reduction practices in school meal service; however, IPA has been criticized because of various reasons, including potential misclassifications of attributes on the IPA grid [47]. Therefore, future studies are required using a more in-depth approach such as additional analyses suggested by several scholars to enhance the validity of IPA [4849].
This study is meaningful in that it can represent the current state of school meal service in Korea by collecting samples through proportional stratified quota sampling considering the school level, foodservice type, and region. The current results could be used as basic data in implementing sodium reduction measures in school meal service.

Notes

Funding: This study was supported by the 2021 Research Fund of Korea Educational Environments Protection Agency.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Lee Y, Kwon S, Kim M.

  • Formal analysis: Lee Y.

  • Investigation: Kim M.

  • Methodology: Lee Y, Kwon S, Kim M.

  • Supervision: Lee Y.

  • Validation: Kim M.

  • Writing - original draft: Lee Y, Kim M.

  • Writing - review & editing: Lee Y, Kwon S, Kim M.

References

1. Korea Ministry of Education. Status of School Meals in 2021. Sejong: Ministry of Education;2022.
2. Kim HY. A Study on the Reduction of Sodium in School Meals (report). Sejong: Ministry of Education;2013.
3. Jeon MS. Relevance of snacking at school store, school meal caloric intake and its satisfaction of female middle and high school students [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2016.
4. Lim H, Ko YS, Shin D, Heo Y, Chung H, Chae I, Kim HY, Kim M, Leem D, Lee Y. Sodium and potassium content of school meals for elementary and junior high school students in Daegu, Masan, Gwangju, and Jeju. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2013; 42:1303–1317.
crossref
5. Park S, Lee K. Study on the salt and sodium content of middle school lunch meals in Gyeongsangbuk-do area: focus on application of ‘SamSam foodservice’. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2016; 45:757–776.
6. Lee S, Chang E, Choi J, Bahn K, Kim M. Current assessment of sodium and potassium intakes in elementary and middle school students through school meals. Korean J Food Sci Technol. 2010; 42:578–585.
7. Lee EM, Park YG, Jung WY, Kim MR, Seo EC, Jung RS, Na MA, Lee JH, Heo OS. Survey on sodium and potassium content of school meals as well as sodium and potassium intake by students in the Daejeon and Chungcheong area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2010; 20:853–862.
8. Meneton P, Jeunemaitre X, de Wardener HE, MacGregor GA. Links between dietary salt intake, renal salt handling, blood pressure, and cardiovascular diseases. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85:679–715. PMID: 15788708.
crossref
9. Kurosawa M, Kikuchi S, Xu J, Inaba Y. Highly salted food and mountain herbs elevate the risk for stomach cancer death in a rural area of Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21:1681–1686. PMID: 16984589.
crossref
10. Kurtz TW, Al-Bander HA, Morris RC Jr. “Salt-sensitive” essential hypertension in men. Is the sodium ion alone important? N Engl J Med. 1987; 317:1043–1048. PMID: 3309653.
11. Jones G, Beard T, Parameswaran V, Greenaway T, von Witt R. A population-based study of the relationship between salt intake, bone resorption and bone mass. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997; 51:561–565. PMID: 11248883.
crossref
12. Teucher B, Dainty JR, Spinks CA, Majsak-Newman G, Berry DJ, Hoogewerff JA, Foxall RJ, Jakobsen J, Cashman KD, Flynn A, et al. Sodium and bone health: impact of moderately high and low salt intakes on calcium metabolism in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23:1477–1485. PMID: 18410231.
crossref
13. Yoon JS, Lee MJ. Calcium status and bone mineral density by the level of sodium intake in young women. Korean J Community Nutr. 2013; 18:125–133.
crossref
14. Pitynski D, Flynn FW, Skinner DC. Does salt have a permissive role in the induction of puberty? Med Hypotheses. 2015; 85:463–467. PMID: 26190310.
crossref
15. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Enforcement Rule of the School Meals Act, Chapter 5 Article 1. Nutritional Standards for School Meals, etc. Sejong: Korean Law Information Center;2022.
16. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. Basic Direction of School Meals in 2022 (Report). Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education;2022.
17. Ha IH, Lyu ES. Awareness, practice, and obstruction of sodium reduction by middle school dietitians in Busan area. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2015; 31:225–232.
crossref
18. Lee KS. Use of salimeters and sodium reduction education in school foodservice in the Gyeonggi area. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2013; 19:173–181.
crossref
19. Kim SH, Shin EK, Lee YK. Sodium reduction practice and importance-performance analysis of sodium reduction methods in school foodservice in Daegu. Korean J Community Nutr. 2020; 25:386–395.
crossref
20. Lee KS. Study on the perception of school dietitians about sodium and the analysis on sodium reduction using NEIS [master’s thesis]. Suwon: Kyonggi University;2007.
21. Lee JH. Awareness and practice of sodium reduction by elementary, middle and high school dietitians in Gyeonggi area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2012; 22:734–743.
22. Ahn SH, Kwon JS, Kim K, Lee Y, Kim HK. Current status, perception and practicability of restaurant staffs related to reducing sodium use in Seongnam, Korea. J Nutr Health. 2019; 52:475–487.
crossref
23. Matzler K, Sauerwein E, Heischmidt K. Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. Serv Ind J. 2003; 23:112–129.
crossref
24. Sampson SE, Showalter MJ. The performance-importance response function: observations and implications. Serv Ind J. 1999; 19:1–25.
crossref
25. Martilla JA, James JC. Importance-performance analysis. J Mark. 1977; 41:77–79.
crossref
26. Park HR, Cha JA, Lim YS. Performance and importance analysis of dietitian’s task in public health nutrition areas. Korean J Community Nutr. 2008; 13:540–554.
27. Park HR, Kim HM, Lee Y, Jeong SY, Lim YS. Sanitation management of cooks in childcare centers in South Korea according to working duration and the type of childcare center: importance-performance analysis. Food Control. 2017; 73:1452–1458.
crossref
28. Lee MJ. Survey on the current state of sodium reduction according to dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of school dietitian [master’s thesis]. Changwon: Kyungnam University;2015.
29. Feldman C, Briceno-Pinar EA, Konas DW, Ruskin M, Toney J, Wunderlich S. A laboratory analysis of total fat content and an examination of portion size of foods served in four New Jersey public middle-school foodservice operations. J Foodserv. 2009; 20:264–274.
crossref
30. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 2004; 12:562–568. PMID: 15044675.
crossref
31. Levitsky DA, Youn T. The more food young adults are served, the more they overeat. J Nutr. 2004; 134:2546–2549. PMID: 15465745.
crossref
32. Hong SM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Yu R, Seo JH, Huh EJ, Cho SS, Yang J. Study on sodium reduction: ‘Healthy restaurant for sodium reduction’. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2014; 20:174–182.
crossref
33. Han JK, Kim H. Comparative study of the job satisfaction, job performance and job importance level of school nutrition teachers and school dietitians. Korean J Food Cult. 2009; 24:525–532.
34. Manios Y, Kafatos A. Health and nutrition education in elementary schools: changes in health knowledge, nutrient intakes and physical activity over a six year period. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2:445–448. PMID: 10610086.
crossref
35. Powers AR, Struempler BJ, Guarino A, Parmer SM. Effects of a nutrition education program on the dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of second-grade and third-grade students. J Sch Health. 2005; 75:129–133. PMID: 15987006.
crossref
36. Wagner N, Meusel D, Kirch W. Nutrition education for children – results and perspectives. J Public Health. 2005; 13:102–110.
crossref
37. McAleese JD, Rankin LL. Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107:662–665. PMID: 17383272.
crossref
38. Lytle LA, Stone EJ, Nichaman MZ, Perry CL, Montgomery DH, Nicklas TA, Zive MM, Mitchell P, Dwyer JT, Ebzery MK, et al. Changes in nutrient intakes of elementary school children following a school-based intervention: results from the CATCH study. Prev Med. 1996; 25:465–477. PMID: 8818069.
crossref
39. Reynolds K, Winton A, Shewchuk R, Hickey C. Social cognitive model of fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary school children. J Nutr Educ. 1999; 31:23–30.
crossref
40. Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002; 11(Suppl 3):S579–S585. PMID: 12492651.
crossref
41. Kim EK, Kim HY. School dietitian awareness, practice, and sodium reduction plan in school meal service. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2016; 32:222–232.
crossref
42. Mattes RD, Donnelly D. Relative contributions of dietary sodium sources. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991; 10:383–393. PMID: 1910064.
crossref
43. Lee MK. Sodium intake of students and sodium content of processed foods used in the school meal service [master’s thesis]. Iksan: Wonkwang University;2009.
44. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. School Meals Act, Chapter 2 Article 7. Placement, etc. of Nutrition Teachers. Sejong: Korean Law Information Center;2022.
45. Han JI. The work performance and the factor contributing to the work performance of nutrition teacher & school dieticians. J Nutr Health. 2015; 48:558–570.
crossref
46. Hong YS, Lee JH. Current status and strategic plan of nutrition education comparing nutrition teachers with dietitians in schools, Gyeonggi area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2013; 18:233–242.
crossref
47. Oh H. Revisiting importance–performance analysis. Tour Manage. 2001; 22:617–627.
crossref
48. Ko Y, Lee Y, Kim D, Kim H. Analysis of recognition and educational needs on competency of secondary school informatics teachers. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol. 2017; 7:1632–1637.
crossref
49. Son EJ, Yong L, Huh MK. A needs analysis of character education on socio-biological human exploration using Borich priority and locus for focus model. Int J Acad Res Reflect. 2019; 7:16–22.
TOOLS
Similar articles