Abstract
Purpose
The efficacy of the Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) for Healthcare Communities program has not been verified. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the online MSC for Healthcare Communities program on burnout, stress-related health, and resilience among surgical trainees.
Methods
A single-arm pilot study was conducted at a tertiary referral academic hospital in Korea. Surgical trainees were recruited through flyer postings; therefore, a volunteer sample was used. Thus, 15 participants participated, among whom 9 were women and 11 were doctor-residents. The Self-Compassion for Healthcare Communities (SCHC) program was conducted from September to October 2021 via weekly online meetings (1 hour) for 6 weeks. The efficacy of the program was evaluated using validated scales for burnout, stress, anxiety, depression, self-compassion, and resilience before and after the intervention and 1 month later.
Results
The results showed significantly reduced burnout, anxiety, and stress scores. After the program, high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization rates decreased, and personal accomplishment increased. Eight participants showed reduced anxiety postintervention, and 9 showed reduced stress. Improvements were observed between pre- and postintervention in resilience, life satisfaction, and common humanity. Changes in self-compassion predicted higher gains in resilience and greater reductions in burnout and stress.
Conclusion
The SCHC is a feasible and effective program to improve resilience, self-compassion, and life satisfaction and reduce stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout in surgical trainees. This study highlights the need to include specific mental health programs in surgical training to improve trainees’ well-being.
Burnout is prevalent in various human service occupations and professional healthcare services [1]. It is particularly widespread among surgical trainees at the frontlines of clinical healthcare. A United States national survey showed that surgical trainees reported the following symptoms: 69%, burnout; 57%, emotional exhaustion; 50%, depersonalization; and 16%, reduced personal accomplishment [2]. According to research conducted in Korea [3], medical trainees reported emotional exhaustion (54.2%), depersonalization (62.5%), and reduced personal accomplishment (33.3%). A growing concern is that burnout in physicians is linked to negative consequences, including physical, psychological, and occupational problems.
Research is currently being conducted on the effects of burnout on physicians, examining variables such as stress-related health, anxiety, depression, alcohol abuse, suicidal thoughts, reduced productivity, absenteeism, high turnover, and increased medical errors [456]. Moreover, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, healthcare professionals have suffered increased fatigue and consequent burnout symptoms [78]. These symptoms negatively affect the professionalism and well-being of physicians and the quality of their patient care.
Consequently, the prevention and alleviation of burnout is an urgent issue in the medical field. Studies have found that enhanced resilience is an important protective factor against burnout [9]. Resilience is defined as an individual’s ability to recover quickly from adverse or stressful situations [10]. It is characterized by mindfulness, coping skills, optimism, and empathy, and is inversely related to burnout risk [25]. Various strategies have been implemented to promote individual resilience in healthcare communities, including mindfulness-based interventions, professional resilience coaching, and enhanced stress resilience training [1112].
Self-compassion is a helpful resource among healthcare professionals to enhance resilience and coping skills when confronted with challenges and common stressors [13]. According to Neff and Germer [14], self-compassion is defined as treating one’s personal limitations and shortcomings with warmth and kindness; the acknowledgment of shared human experiences, including experiences of pain, imperfections, and difficulties (regarded in this study as common humanity); and a clear and balanced awareness of the experience of suffering in the present. Research has demonstrated that self-compassionate medical trainees and residents have the potential advantage of being confident in their ability to provide calm and compassionate care to themselves and others [15]. Furthermore, physicians with higher levels of self-compassion have reported better work engagement, reduced emotional exhaustion, and increased life satisfaction [16]. Therefore, a prerequisite for psychological well-being and compassionate care is that the healthcare professional acknowledges and accepts their difficulties and possesses self-compassion.
The Self-Compassion for Healthcare Communities (SCHC) program is a brief version of the Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) program traditionally used in healthcare settings [13]. Due to the fatigue experienced by physicians, the SCHC program is useful as a practical self-compassion intervention. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the SCHC program in decreasing the prevalence of burnout and improving resilience in a sample of Korean surgical trainees.
The Institutional Review Board in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital approved the study (No. B-2007-624-304). Subsequently, surgical trainees were recruited from a tertiary referral academic hospital in Seongnam, Korea. The research team facilitated this through flyers, advertising the SCHC program from August 15 to 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria for participation were (1) being employed as a surgical trainee, doctor-resident, or fellow; (2) having no previous experience regarding meditation; and (3) having no known mental disorders. The preferred sample size was 20 students. All participants provided informed consent before completing the preintervention survey. The study protocol was registered as NCT04857567 on clinicaltrial.gov before participant enrollment.
The study used a 1-group pretest–posttest design without a control group. The SCHC program was conducted every Thursday and Friday for 6 weeks between September and October 2021. A total of 10 participants were assigned to each session, and those who could not participate on their assigned day were allowed to participate on other available days. Three supplementary sessions were conducted on Saturdays for those unable to participate during the week. These sessions were held according to the trainees’ work, which often included unplanned overtime and late surgeries. Participants attended weekly live online sessions via Zoom for 1 hour from 7:30 to 8:30 PM. The participation rate for all the sessions was 87.8% (session 1, 86.7%; session 2, 93.3%; session 3, 86.7%; session 4, 100%; session 5, 66.7%; and session 6, 93.3%). A certified MSC teacher trainer, Y.S., and an MSC-trained teacher, H.S, led the intervention.
At the beginning of each session, participants were allocated time to share the contents of the last session’s practice as an informal meditation exercise. This was followed by the instructors presenting a daily topic and guiding participants through 1 or 2 targeted exercises. Thereafter, the research team sent a reminder e-mail to encourage the participants to practice the sessions’ learnings in their daily lives.
Each session of the SCHC program concentrated on a specific topic: In session 1, participants were provided an overview of the program, and concepts such as self-compassion and the misunderstandings thereof (e.g., self-compassion as a form of self-pity) were presented. Session 2 introduced self-compassion exercises, such as supportive touch, and mindfulness practices, including mindful breathing and being aware of physical sensations. Session 3 focused on how to change unwanted behavior using kindness instead of self-criticism. Session 4 taught methods to manage intractable emotions, such as labeling emotions and being aware of them throughout the day. Session 5 explored caregiving fatigue and burnout and highlighted the importance of understanding one’s limitations in resolving others’ pain through “compassion with equanimity.” Session 6 encouraged the participants to know their core values as caregivers and instructed them on how to continue the practices included throughout the course [17].
Participants completed the baseline and first posttest online, 1 week before and after the program, respectively. A second posttest was conducted as a 1-month follow-up. In these assessments, burnout was measured using the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Scale [18], which contains 3 subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Responses were provided on a seven-point scale ranging from 0 (almost never) to 6 (almost always). The total burnout scores on each of the 3 subscales were divided into high, moderate, or low levels based on the cutoffs for the 3 subscales of burnout (emotional exhaustion: low, ≤18; moderate, 19–26; and high, ≥27 / depersonalization: low, ≤5; moderate, 6–9; and high: ≥10 / reduced personal accomplishment: low, ≥34; moderate, 29–33; and high, 28) [2], and presented in the results section.
Self-compassion was measured using the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale [19], which contains 6 subscales: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. Responses were provided on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always).
Life satisfaction was measured using the 5-item Satisfaction with Life Scale [20]. Responses were provided on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 7 (almost always).
Depression, anxiety, and stress were measured using the short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) [21]. This tool examines the respondent’s symptoms experienced over the past week on a scale of 0 (never) to 3 (almost always). Subscale items were summated for a total score in each category. The total depression, anxiety, and stress scores were stratified into normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe levels per the standards of the DASS-21. Total depression, anxiety, and stress scores were categorized into normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe levels according to the standard of the DASS scale (depression: normal, 0–9; mild, 10–13; moderate: 14–20; and severe, 21–27; extremely severe, ≥28 / anxiety: normal, 0–7; mild, 8–9; moderate, 10–14; severe, 15–19; and extremely severe, ≥20 / stress: normal, 0–14; mild, 15–18; moderate, 19–25; severe, 26–33; and extremely severe, ≥34), and presented in the results section.
Resilience was measured using the 27-item Resilience Scale, which contains 3 subscales: control, positivity, and sociality [22]. Responses were provided using a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always).
Participants who attended at least 4 of the 6 sessions and had completed all pre- and posttests were included in the final data analysis set (n = 15). The power of normality was satisfied for all variables except common humanity in the pretest and self-kindness in the first posttest as less than 30 samples were used to conduct the Shapiro-Wilk tests. The characteristics of the participants are presented as descriptive statistics. A series of repeated measures analysis of variances (RMANOVAs) were conducted under sphericity conditions to confirm any significant changes in the study variables between the pre- and posttests. Friedman tests, the nonparametric alternative to RMANOVA, were conducted for 2 study variables, common humanity and self-kindness, due to nonnormal distributions. The post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction were conducted to compare changes between the pretest and both posttests. The following analyses were conducted to examine whether changes in self-compassion predicted changes in the outcome variables: first, to create standardized difference scores, postscores were regressed on prescores, and B scores estimated from the regression were subtracted from postscores and standardized. Second, the standardized difference scores were used to conduct linear regressions.
All statistical tests were 2-sided; the P-value of <0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference. We used IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Corp.) to analyze all the data.
Among the 15 participants, there were 11 residents and 4 fellows. Participants’ response rate remained at 100% at the pre- and posttests and at the follow-up survey. The general characteristics of the participants are displayed in Table 1.
Burnout variables of the pretest were used to categorize participants into levels: 11 participants (73.3%), high emotional exhaustion level (score range, 27–51); 8 participants (53.3%), high depersonalization level (score range, 11–25); and 1 participant (6.7%), high reduced personal accomplishment level (score, ≥28). Fig. 1 presents the burnout pattern changes of all the participants before and after the SCHC program. In the posttest, high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization rates decreased by 6.6% (1 participant), while personal accomplishment rates increased by 6.7% (1 participant). In the 1-month follow-up test, high depersonalization and high reduced individual accomplishment rates decreased by 6.7% (1 participant) compared with the posttest.
In the pretest, all participants reported normal to moderate levels of depression (score range, 0–20); 12 experienced normal to moderate levels of anxiety (score range, 0–14), and 3 reported severe to extremely severe anxiety (score range, 16–20) (Fig. 2). Further, 10 participants experienced normal to moderate stress levels (score range, 0–18), and 5 reported severe to extremely severe stress (score range, 26–30). After participating in the SCHC program, 8 of 15 participants (53.3%) showed relief from anxiety or maintenance of anxiety levels, and 9 (60.0%) were relieved of stress or maintained their stress levels. Further, 3 participants (20.0%), who were categorized with extremely severe or severe anxiety, showed mild to moderate remission in anxiety levels in the posttest following the intervention, and 5 participants (33.3%) with extremely severe or severe stress levels were relieved in the posttest. Fig. 3 depicts changes in anxiety and stress in all participants following the SCHC program intervention.
Table 2 displays the means, standard deviations, and significant changes between the pretest, posttest, and 1-month follow-up. Based on the RMANOVA and Friedman tests, significant differences between the pretest, posttest, and 1-month follow-up scores were found in control (F2,28 = 4.3, P = 0.024), total resilience (F2,28 = 5.5, P = 0.010), life satisfaction (F2,28 = 3.8, P = 0.035), and common humanity (χ2[2, n = 15] = 9.7, P = 0.008). The post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction revealed that, compared with the pretest scores, posttest scores increased in control (mean difference, 0.3; P = 0.024), total resilience (mean difference, 0.2; P = 0.019), life satisfaction mean difference, 0.6; P = 0.028), and common humanity (mean difference, 0.9; P = 0.041). However, there were no significant differences between the posttest and 1-month follow-up. Therefore, changes were maintained postintervention.
Table 3 shows that self-compassion gains significantly predicted changes in resilience, burnout, and stress. An increase in self-compassion significantly predicted greater gains in resilience (B = 0.60, R2 = 0.36, P = 0.018) and greater reductions in burnout (B = –0.66, R2 = 0.43, P = 0.008) and stress (B = –0.72, R2 = 0.52, P = 0.002).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elucidate the feasibility and efficacy of an online SCHC program to improve resilience and decrease burnout symptoms in surgical trainees in Korea. The main results from the current study are as follows. First, we observed that after the SCHC program, the rates of high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization decreased to moderate levels, and the rate of personal accomplishment increased. Second, we found that 8 of 15 participants (53.3%) experienced relief from—or maintenance of—anxiety levels, and 9 (60.0%) were relieved of—or maintained their—stress levels. The SCHC program seemed effective for lowering mental pains, including burnout, anxiety, and stress. Third, significant differences were noted in control, 1 subscale of resilience, total resilience, life satisfaction, common humanity, and 1 subscale of self-compassion. Further, gains in self-compassion significantly predicted an increase in resilience and decrease in burnout and stress. The SCHC appeared to increase positive variables, such as resilience or life satisfaction, and decrease negative variables, such as stress.
Previous research showed that surgical trainees are directly exposed to patient pain and trauma and that 60% of trainees experience burnout. Therefore, it is important to promote surgical trainees’ mental health and well-being [23]. Studies have consistently suggested that interventions implemented to alleviate and prevent burnout in surgical trainees need to target the enhancement of their resilience [5]. This study addressed self-compassion, a coping mechanism related to personal challenges and stressors, which is known to improve resilience. Self-compassion and mindfulness of suffering are vital in treating oneself with warmth and kindness [14]. Acts of kindness by caring for oneself benefit both the giver and the receiver; although kindness is temporary, it is an appropriate strategy to increase personal well-being [23]. The most significant benefit of self-compassion training is to teach specific practices that individuals can apply in their daily lives [13]. Since stress is ongoing in healthcare work environments, the capacity to care for and support oneself in moments of anguish is a healthy coping strategy. Previous research has demonstrated that the SCHC program effectively teaches healthcare professionals to be more self-compassionate and manage occupational stress to increase their well-being and empathy and reduce fatigue and burnout [13].
Surgical trainees who participated in the SCHC program experienced burnout symptoms, such as emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, also previously reported to be high in surgery residents [2]. A longitudinal study of burnout revealed that its development progressed from emotional exhaustion to depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment [24]. Furthermore, longitudinal results that explored the causal sequence between burnout and depression found that burnout induces depression [25]. These results suggest that the emotional exhaustion of surgical trainees is an important signal for early intervention. Moreover, the results reveal that mental health management using intervention strategies is necessary to address burnout experienced by surgical trainees. The SCHC program is particularly helpful for surgical trainees who are experiencing early burnout symptoms (e.g., emotional exhaustion or depersonalization) because it is an intervention that helps deactivate the threat defense system (fight-flight-freeze) induced in stressful situations and activate the system that instills a sense of safety. Stress and burnout conditions activate threat defense systems biologically, leading people to worry more, choose avoidance responses, and become critical of others externally, as well as become more self-judgmental and self-critical, and experience self-isolation internally, while the system activating a sense of safety helps evoke thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that promote positive links with others [26]. As a training that includes compassionate care, empathy, and warmth, the SCHC program helps activate a safety-seeking threat protection system when detecting signals that are perceived as external or internal psychological threats [13]. This self-compassionate attitude of being gentle, comforting, and tolerant suggests that emotional tension, physical exhaustion, and lack of self-affection can be alleviated. Thus, the system promoting a sense of safety can facilitate relaxed and self-calming conditions, thus helping improve resilience in the face of negative experiences, such as early emotional exhaustion and depersonalization due to burnout.
Similarly, research has reported that surgical trainees tend to be more stressed due to excessive workload and time pressure [27]. They may experience anxiety and depression due to uncertainty and pressure regarding their capacity to care for their patients’ well-being [228]. Self-compassion or mindfulness training programs can help exhausted health professionals recognize their own feelings and thoughts, accept their experiences as a universal human experiences, and be kind to themselves [1113]. These positive attitude changes lead to a clearer state of mind and to their adopting self-care strategies [19]. The SCHC relieves negative experiences, such as psychological distress, fear of failure, trauma, anxiety, and depression, and promotes positive outcomes, such as positive mental health, happiness, curiosity, optimism, resilience, and life satisfaction. Such evidence suggests that the SCHC program can be beneficial for preventing burnout and enhancing psychological well-being.
The findings of this study are significant because they demonstrate the effectiveness of the online SCHC program, unlike previous research. Prior studies of online smartphone applications or mindful training programs have not been able to verify their efficacy [2930]. In a recent study, self-compassion was found to increase through a smartphone application intervention; however, it was difficult to expect decreased burnout and perceived stress [11]. In the current study, the online SCHC program reduced burnout and increased resilience.
Despite the novel findings, some limitations of this study must be acknowledged. First, after the SCHC program intervention, significant changes were found in common humanity, a subscale of self-compassion. However, there were no significant improvements in the other subscales of self-compassion, namely self-kindness and mindfulness. These results suggest that the short-term MSC program improved skills to be cognitively aware of one’s suffering; however, it was challenging to demonstrate mindfulness and self-kindness. Continuous daily practices are required to internalize self-kindness and mindfulness. Consequently, it is necessary to complement the SCHC program to encourage and guide daily practices. Second, we used a comparatively small sample size of 15 participants without a control group, and environmental factors may have affected the results. Therefore, this study’s findings should be interpreted with caution. Third, a follow-up evaluation of 1 month was a relatively short period for assessing the SCHC program’s benefits. In future research, it will be valuable to evaluate program effects with larger number of participants based on follow-up evaluations over longer durations. In addition, the chosen setting was an environment where most surgical trainees had to manage their workload and the SCHC program due to work pressure. This intervention should be temporally supported to ensure that environmentally sound program participation is possible. However, this study provides valuable insights into the mechanism through which the online SCHC program decreases burnout and stress and promotes resilience in surgical trainees.
This study aimed to elucidate the SCHC program’s effectiveness for surgical trainees using an online platform. The online SCHC intervention was suitable for reducing anxiety, stress, and burnout in surgical trainees. Additionally, it also helped improve resilience, self-compassion, and life satisfaction. MSC is a contributing factor in strengthening resilience and alleviating or preventing burnout. Thus, it is an important resource for surgical trainees to cope with stress. Therefore, it is recommended that specific mental health programs should be included in surgical training to improve the well-being of surgical trainees.
Notes
Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of Korean Society of Coloproctology (Busan, South Korea), 2022.
References
1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172:1377–1385. PMID: 22911330.
2. Elmore LC, Jeffe DB, Jin L, Awad MM, Turnbull IR. National survey of burnout among US general surgery residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 223:440–451. PMID: 27238875.
3. Shin S. The relationship between burnout and the personality characters among interns. Dongguk J Med. 2009; 16:185–192.
4. Dimou FM, Eckelbarger D, Riall TS. Surgeon burnout: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 222:1230–1239. PMID: 27106639.
5. Lebares CC, Guvva EV, Ascher NL, O’Sullivan PS, Harris HW, Epel ES. Burnout and stress among us surgery residents: psychological distress and resilience. J Am Coll Surg. 2018; 226:80–90. PMID: 29107117.
6. Anderson P. Physicians experience the highest suicide rate of any profession [Internet]. Medscape Medical News;2018. cited 2021 Dec 5. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/896257
.
7. Freund Y. The challenge of emergency medicine facing the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020; 27:155. PMID: 32205709.
8. de Wit K, Mercuri M, Wallner C, Clayton N, Archambault P, Ritchie K, et al. Canadian emergency physician psychological distress and burnout during the first 10 weeks of COVID-19: a mixed-methods study. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020; 1:1030–1038. PMID: 32905025.
9. Sotile WM, Fallon R, Orlando J. Curbing burnout hysteria with self-compassion: a key to physician resilience. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020; 40 Suppl 1:S8–S12. PMID: 32502063.
10. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008; 15:194–200. PMID: 18696313.
11. Lebares CC, Hershberger AO, Guvva EV, Desai A, Mitchell J, Shen W, et al. Feasibility of formal mindfulness-based stress-resilience training among surgery interns: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2018; 153:e182734. PMID: 30167655.
12. Song Y, Swendiman RA, Shannon AB, Torres-Landa S, Khan FN, Williams NN, et al. Can we coach resilience? An evaluation of professional resilience coaching as a well-being initiative for surgical interns. J Surg Educ. 2020; 77:1481–1489. PMID: 32446771.
13. Neff KD, Knox MC, Long P, Gregory K. Caring for others without losing yourself: an adaptation of the Mindful Self-Compassion Program for Healthcare Communities. J Clin Psychol. 2020; 76:1543–1562. PMID: 32627192.
14. Neff KD, Germer C. Self-compassion and psychological well-being. Seppälä EM, Simon-Thomas E, Brown SL, Worline MC, Cameron CD, Doty JR, editors. The Oxford handbook of compassion science. Oxford University Press;2017. p. 371–385.
15. Olson K, Kemper KJ. Factors associated with well-being and confidence in providing compassionate care. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2014; 19:292–296. PMID: 24986815.
16. Babenko O, Mosewich AD, Lee A, Koppula S. Association of physicians' self-compassion with work engagement, exhaustion, and professional life satisfaction. Med Sci (Basel). 2019; 7:29. PMID: 30759845.
17. Bluth K, Lathren C, Silbersack Hickey JV, Zimmerman S, Wretman CJ, Sloane PD. Self-compassion training for certified nurse assistants in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021; 69:1896–1905. PMID: 33837539.
18. Maslach C, Jackson SE. Maslach burnout inventory: manual. 2nd ed. Consulting Psychologists Press;1986.
19. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003; 2:223–250.
20. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49:71–75. PMID: 16367493.
21. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005; 44(Pt 2):227–239. PMID: 16004657.
22. Shin WY, Kim MG, Kim JH. Developing measures of resilience for Korean adolescents and testing cross, convergent, and discriminant validity. Stud Korean Youth. 2009; 20:105–131.
23. Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D. Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005; 9:111–131.
24. Golembiewski RT, Munzenrider RF, Stevenson JG. Phases of burnout: developments in concepts and applications. Praeger;1988.
25. Shin H, Noh H, Jang Y, Park YM, Lee SM. A longitudinal examination of the relationship between teacher burnout and depression. J Employ Couns. 2013; 50:124–137.
26. Gilbert P. Compassion: conceptualizations, research and use in psychotherapy. Routledge;2005.
27. Galaiya R, Kinross J, Arulampalam T. Factors associated with burnout syndrome in surgeons: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020; 102:401–407. PMID: 32326734.
28. Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med. 2014; 89:443–451. PMID: 24448053.
29. Goldhagen BE, Kingsolver K, Stinnett SS, Rosdahl JA. Stress and burnout in residents: impact of mindfulness-based resilience training. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015; 6:525–532. PMID: 26347361.
30. Mistretta EG, Davis MC, Temkit M, Lorenz C, Darby B, Stonnington CM. Resilience training for work-related stress among health care workers: results of a randomized clinical trial comparing in-person and smartphone-delivered interventions. J Occup Environ Med. 2018; 60:559–568. PMID: 29370014.
Table 2
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
a)By the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. b)By the Friedman tests. c)No significant mean differences after using the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.
*P < 0.05, mean difference compared with pretest, statistically significant at the 5% significance.