ABSTRACT
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) refers to blastocyst implantation outside the uterine
endometrium. EP is major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Treatment
options include surgery, medical therapy with methotrexate, or expectant
management. Methotrexate is the primary regimen used in cases of early,
unruptured ectopic pregnancies. Most side effects of methotrexate are minor,
including nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and photosensitive skin
reaction. Serious side effects, including bone marrow suppression, and pulmonary
fibrosis, are invariably observed when methotrexate is administered in high
doses with frequent dosing intervals, in chemotherapeutic protocols for
malignancy. These side effects are uncommon with the doses used to treat ectopic
pregnancies. Since cases of methotrexate-induced pancreatitis are rare, we
report a case of pancreatitis in a patient with EP treated with methotrexate and
expect to consider pancreatitis as a side effect of methotrexate in a patient
with upper abdominal pain undergoing methotrexate chemotherapy.
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) refers to blastocyst implantation outside the uterine cavity.
The incidence of EP is rising, which can be explained by the increased use of
assisted reproductive technologies, tubal surgeries, and improved diagnostic tools
[1]. EP is medically important because it
is associated with reduced fertility and an increased risk of subsequent EPs [2]. Treatment options for EP involve surgical
and medical intervention [1]. Medical
treatment primarily uses a regimen of methotrexate (MTX) in cases of early,
unruptured EP, and is reported to be safe and effective [1].
MTX is a folic acid analog that competitively binds to dihydrofolic acid reductase,
an enzyme that converts dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate. This binding prevents the
reduction of folate to its active form, tetrahydrofolate. It transports one carbon
group during the synthesis of purine nucleotides and thymidylates. MTX impairs DNA
synthesis, DNA repair, and cellular replication [3]. MTX selectively acts on rapidly dividing cells, such as trophoblast
cells, which comprise the implantation site during early gestation [4]. MTX enters the liver via the hepatic artery
and is rapidly cleared from the body by the kidneys, with 90% of the intravenous
dose excreted unchanged within 24 h of injection [5,6].
Two common regimens are available for MTX: multidose [MTX 1.0 mg/kg intramuscularly
(i.m.) daily; days 0, 2, 4, and 6 alternated with folinic acid 0.1 mg/kg orally on
days 1, 3, 5, and 7]; and single dose (MTX 0.4 to 1.0 mg/kg or 50 mg/m2
i.m. without folinic acid) [7]. Current
regimens of MTX for the treatment of EP reduce the total MTX dose that patients
receive compared to other indications such as chemotherapy. Therefore, the incidence
of therapy-related side effects was low [8].
Most side effects of MTX are minor, such as nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and
diarrhea, and have rarely been reported to be linked to pancreatitis.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common disease that affects the digestive system. AP is
diagnosed on the basis on the fulfillment of 2 out of 3 of the following criteria :
clinical (upper abdominal pain), laboratory (serum amylase or lipase
>3× upper limit of normal) and/or imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasonography)
criteria [9]. Various etiologies of AP, most
of which are due to gallstones. Other common causes of pancreatitis are alcohol
consumption, hyperlipidemia, hypercalcemia, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, drugs and
toxins, which may also be idiopathic or traumatic [10]. The management of AP involves providing active treatment, including
fluid resuscitation, nutritional support, analgesics, and etiological treatment
[11]. At present, three cases of
MTX-induced pancreatitis have been reported [12,13]. We report a case of a
40-year-old woman who underwent MTX therapy for an unruptured EP and developed
AP.
A 40-year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman visited the emergency department with upper
abdominal pain. She had nausea and a low-grade fever, with a maximum temperature of
37.8°C. Abdominal examination revealed severe tenderness in the epigastric
area, and both the right and left upper quadrants without muscle guarding or rebound
tenderness.
The patient did not consume any other medications or alcohol. She had visited another
hospital four weeks ago because of lower abdominal pain and was diagnosed with a
left tubal EP. On that day, her total serum hCG level was 23,544 mIU/mL. She had
been treated with a single dose of MTX (99.1 mg), intramuscularly four weeks before
her visit to this hospital. A week after MTX injection, her total serum hCG level
was 13,166 mIU/mL, and 4,620 mIU/mL after two weeks. Three weeks after the injection
the total serum hCG level was 1,400 mIU/mL, and transvaginal sonography revealed a
decrease in the size of the left adnexal mass.
Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scan showed diffuse acute interstitial
edematous pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collection and infiltration (Fig. 1A) and acute hematoma in the cul-de-sac
without active bleeding (Fig. 1C). Upper
abdominal ultrasonography findings were consistent with that of AP (Fig. 2A, 2B).
Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed an empty uterus with 2.53 mm thick endometrium
and a probable ectopic mass at the left adnexa, measuring 3.15 cm in the largest
diameter, with degenerated gestational sac inside, but no fetal pole (Fig. 3A). A hematoma sized 7.9×3.5
cm2 was noted in the posterior cul-de-sac (Fig. 3B).
According to the laboratory investigations, hemoglobin was 12.6 g/dL (reference
range, 12.0–16.0 g/dL), WBC was 8,400 μL (4,000–10,000
μL), platelet counts were 349,000 μL (150,000–450,000
μL), total bilirubin was 0.38 mg/dL (≤1.2 mg/dL) with direct bilirubin
level of 0.14 mg/dL (≤0.25 mg/dL), AST was 15 IU/L (≤33 IU/L), ALT was
8 IU/L (≤33 IU/L), ALP was 87 IU/L (30–120 IU/L), total cholesterol
was 193 mg/dL (≤200 mg/dL), which were within the normal range. The enzymes
showed elevated levels: LDH 282 IU/L (135–214 IU/L), amylase 1,864 IU/L
(28–100 IU/L), lipase 4,394 IU/L (13–60 IU/L), CRP 0.97 mg/dL
(≤0.5 mg/dL), triglyceride 178 mg/dL (28–150 mg/dL), fibrinogen 458.1
mg/dL (180–350 mg/dL), FDP 13.7 μg/mL (≤5 μg/mL),
D-dimer 5.44 mg/L (≤0.59 mg/L). HCG was detected on urine examination, and
the total hCG level on admission was 1,289.0 mIU/mL. Considering her clinical
manifestations, laboratory tests, CT scan and abdominal ultrasound findings, the
diagnosis of AP was confirmed.
The patient was admitted to the hospital and received conservative medical management
with analgesia, hydration and fasting. She received gabexate 20 mg intravenously
daily for five days and 100,000 units injection units of ulinastatin intravenously
per daily for two days. Those gabexate mesylate and ulinastatin are protease
inhibitors, which are accepted as a potential treatment to inhibit the pancreatic
inflammation in AP [14].
She was administered ciprofloxacin 400 mg every 12 h intravenously for five days
during her hospitalization.
On fourth day after hospitalization, repeated measurements of her amylase and lipase
levels were within normal limits: amylase 75 IU/L (28–100 IU/L), lipase 35
U/L (13–60 IU/L); and the total hCG level decreased to 762.0 mIU/mL. The
patient’s symptoms continued to improve during her course of hospitalization.
The patient was discharged with oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg per 12 h for discharge
medication, on the 6th day of admission after significant clinical and laboratory
improvement. The patient presented with complete resolution of symptoms and
biochemical results during ambulatory follow-up. The follow-up transvaginal
sonography revealed a decrease in the size of the hematoma and left adnexa mass
(Fig. 4A, 4B).
We report a rare case of MTX-induced pancreatitis in a patient with EP and treated
with MTX. EP may be life threatening, and further treatment is determined based on
the patient’s hemodynamic status, size of the ectopic mass, and level of
beta-hCG. Medical treatment primarily uses the regimen of MTX [1]. Current regimens of MTX reduce the total MTX dose that
patients receive compared with other indications such as chemotherapy [4]. Therefore, the incidence of therapy-related
side effects is low, and most are minor side effects such as nausea, vomiting,
stomatitis, and diarrhea [1]. Cases of
MTX-induced pancreatitis are rare, and previous studies have reported a case of a
16-year-old girl with systemic lupus erythematosus acute necrotizing pancreatitis
was attributed to a combination regimen involving MTX [12]. Another case report is of a 36-year-old woman who received
MTX along with etoposide, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine for
suspected hydatidiform mole developed AP. Moreover, another case of a 10-year-old
girl with acute lymphatic leukemia who was treated with vincristine, daunorubicin,
L-asparaginase, intrathecal MTX, cyclophosphamide, and oral 6 MP and had MTX-induced
pancreatitis has been reported [13]. However,
AP after using MTX for the treatment of EP was not found in previously published
studies and this report has very important implication that we should consider other
differential diagnosis when we evaluate the patient suffering severe abdominal pain,
treated with MTX due to EP. Cramp abdominal pain which is self-limiting and
controlled with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent is common side effect during
MTX for an EP [15]. Also, If a patient with
EP experiences severe abdominal pain after MTX therapy, clinicians would mostly
suspect ectopic mass rupture, which will necessitate surgical treatment, and other
differential diagnosis may be overlooked. However, if there is no evidence of an
ectopic mass rupture, suspicion of other causes, laboratory tests, and imaging must
be performed based on the clinical manifestations.
The side effects of MTX may be overlooked in the clinical settings of EP. If a
patient with EP experiences abdominal pain after MTX therapy, clinicians would
mostly suspect ectopic mass rupture, which will necessitate surgical treatment.
However, if there is no evidence of an ectopic mass rupture, suspicion of other
causes, laboratory tests, and imaging must be performed based on the clinical
manifestations.
This case report has some limitations. For the diagnosis of an adverse drug reaction,
the time relationship between the use of the drug and the occurrence of the reaction
should be assessed. In addition, drug rechallenge should be considered [16]. However, since the patient received a
single dose of MTX, there was no chance of rechallenge with drug.
Second, MTX has rarely been reported to be associated with the pancreatitis, and its
possible etiology is unknown. Therefore, future studies and case reports are
required in this area.
Although MTX-induced pancreatitis is a rare complication, it is important for
clinicians to be aware of all possible complications of MTX because it is a widely
used medical treatment for EP. We hope that this may aid in the evaluation of
patients with severe abdominal pain after using MTX therapy.
References
1. Taran FA, Kagan KO, Hübner M, Hoopmann M, Wallwiener D, Bruker S. The diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112((41)):693–703. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0693. PMID: 26554319. PMCID: PMC4643163.
2. Chow WH, Daling JR, Cates W JR, Greenberg RS. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy. Epidemiol Rev. 1987; 9((1)):70–94. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036309. PMID: 3315720.
3. Lipscomb GH. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 55((2)):424–432. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510a48. PMID: 22510624.
4. Barnhart K, Coutifaris C, Esposito M. The pharmacology of methotrexate. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005; 2((3)):409–417. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2.3.409. PMID: 11336595.
5. Bleyer WA. The clinical pharmacology of methotrexate: new applications of an
old drug. Cancer. 1978; 41((1)):36–51. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197801)41:1<36::AID-CNCR2820410108>3.0.CO;2-I. PMID: 342086.
6. Kremer JM. Toward a better understanding of methotrexate. Arthrit Rhrumat. 2004; 50((5)):1370–1382. DOI: 10.1002/art.20278. PMID: 15146406.
7. Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A, Lu C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, et al. A prospective evaluation of a single-visit strategy to manage
pregnancies of unknown location. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20((5)):1398–1403. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh746. PMID: 15665023.
8. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Gray LA, Carson SA, Buster JE. Methotrexate treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy: a report
of 100 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77((5)):749–753.
9. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis
Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute
pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13((4)):Se1–Se15. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
10. Toouli J, Brooke-Smith M, Bassi C, Carr-Locke D, Telford J, Freeny P, et al. Guidelines for the management of acute
pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 17:S15–S39. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.2.x. PMID: 12000591.
11. Zheng Z, Ding YX, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis,
pathogenetic mechanism, and management. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9((1)):69. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4802. PMID: 33553362. PMCID: PMC7859757.
12. Kolk A, Horneff G, Wilgenbus KK, Wahn V, Gerharz CD. Acute lethal necrotising pancreatitis in childhood systemic lupus
erythematosus--possible toxicity of immunosuppressive
therapy. Clini Exp Rheumatol. 1995; 13((3)):399–403.
13. Shrikiran A. A rare case of methotrextate induced pancreatitis in acute
leaukemia patient. WebmedCentral Paediatrics. 2011; 2((12)):WMC002820.
14. Chen CC, Wang SS, Lee FY. Action of antiproteases on the inflammatory response in acute
pancreatitis. JOP J Pancreas. 2007; 8:S488–S494.
15. Stovall TG, Ling FW. Single-dose methotrexate: an expanded clinical
trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168((6)):1759–1762. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90687-E. PMID: 8317518.
16. Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and
management. Lancet. 2000; 356((9237)):1255–1259. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9. PMID: 11072960.