Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.38(10) > 1516081831

TOOLS
Kim, Chung, and Don Lee: Metachronous Contralateral Occurrence of Hydrocele After Unilateral Hydrocelectomy in Children Younger Than 8 Years
Original Article
Urology

Journal of Korean Medical Science 2023; 38(10): e79.

Published online: 3 March 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e79

Metachronous Contralateral Occurrence of Hydrocele After Unilateral Hydrocelectomy in Children Younger Than 8 Years

Jae Yeon Kim1, 2, Jae Min Chung1, 2, 3, Sang Don Lee1, 2, 3

1Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.

2Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.

3Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.

Address for Correspondence: Jae Min Chung, MD, PhD. Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20 Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea. busanuro@hanmail.net

Received 24 July 2022       Accepted 19 December 2022

© 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Hydrocele on the contralateral side after surgical repair is an uncommon condition compared to surgical site recurrence. Although there has been much research on metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia in children, metachronous contralateral hydrocele, which share a common pathology with inguinal hernias, has not yet been investigated. We have investigated the incidence and risk factors for metachronous contralateral occurrence of communicating and noncommunicating hydroceles in children younger than 8 years.

Methods

From January 2017 to June 2020, 302 children younger than 8 who were diagnosed with unilateral hydroceles were treated in our hospital without surgical exploration of contralateral hydrocele. The disease was classified into communicating and noncommunicating hydroceles. We divided patients into two groups according to the presence of metachronous contralateral hydrocele and analyzed the differences between the two groups.

Results

Among 302 patients, the mean age was 36.4 ± 20.9 months. Metachronous contralateral hydrocele occurred in 15 (4.9%) patients as communicating hydroceles. Comparison between the two groups showed statistically significant differences in type of hydrocele (P = 0.047) at first diagnosis.

Conclusion

Clinically evident risk of metachronous contralateral hydrocele after unilateral hydrocelectomy was 4.9%. Despite the relatively low incidence rate, the risk of metachronous contralateral occurrence should always be consulted with parents before surgical treatment of hydroceles.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-38-e79-abf001.jpg

Keywords: Testicular Hydrocele, Recurrence, Child, Incidence, Risk Factors

INTRODUCTION

A hydrocele is a fluid collection within the tunica vaginalis around the testicle or within the spermatic cord. When the fluid travels from the abdominal cavity through a patent processus vaginalis (PV), it is a communicating hydrocele. In contrast, a noncommunicating hydrocele has no connection to the abdominal cavity. These PVs can be classified into obliterated, partially patent, and totally patent PVs.1
Hydrocelectomy is one of the most common operations in children.2 Conventional open hydrocelectomy is simple and safe, providing fast recovery and low morbidity. The laparoscopic approach can be practical in bilateral communication cases.3 Although patent PV can be easily detected with laparoscopic surgery, noncommunicating hydrocele is unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery.
Communicating hydroceles are essentially associated with inguinal hernias, sharing a common etiology4 and a similar method of surgical repair.5 Both diseases occur due to the patent PV or the patency of the internal inguinal ring. Several studies have examined metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia, especially in infants.67891011 Metachronous contralateral hydroceles are uncommon compared to inguinal hernias, and this topic has not been widely explored.
Many studies of hydroceles with patent PVs have been investigated along with inguinal hernias. However, the two entities have distinct natural courses; inguinal hernias do not improve naturally after development, whereas hydroceles with patent PVs can resolve spontaneously. Therefore, it would be meaningful to separate hydroceles with patent PVs from inguinal hernias and investigate surgical findings and metachronous contralateral hydroceles of hydroceles in these patients.
There are also few reports in the literature explicitly targeting hydrocelectomy, although it appears that the classic treatment of hydrocele using an inguinal approach still represents the standard of care.
We aim to report the distribution of hydrocele types according to age and analyze the incidence and risk factors of metachronous contralateral hydroceles in children under 8 years old.

METHODS

Data acquisition

From January 2017 through June 2020, 302 children younger than 8 years were treated with unilateral hydrocelectomy without contralateral exploration by a single surgeon. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a bilateral hydrocele, had clinical evidence of an inguinal hernia containing abdominal contents (bowel or omentum), an associated undescended testis, or had previously undergone inguinal surgery on either side.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of hydrocele was based on clinical presentation, physical examination, and ultrasonographic findings. Ultrasonography was used to determine complex cases or suspected cases of bilateral hydroceles. We suspected the presence of communicating hydrocele when there was a change in hydrocele size during a Valsalva maneuver or straining or crying and during direct manual palpation.

Surgery

Hydrocelectomy was performed using the inguinal or scrotal approach, depending on the initial impression of communicating or noncommunicating hydrocele. We chose inguinal incision for cases of suspected communicating hydrocele and scrotal incision for suspected noncommunicating hydrocele. Communication was confirmed inside the surgical field by examining the PV directly for a defect in communicating in hydroceles.

Follow-up

All patients revisited our institution 6 months after the first hydrocelectomy to check for postoperative conditions. Patients were recommended to revisit before age 8 when they entered school. When there was a new onset hydrocele on the opposite side during follow-up, they were detected the same way as the initial diagnosis. The second surgery was done at least after a postoperative period of 6 months.

Outcome analysis

We performed a cross-sectional study to obtain clinical data, including age at first visit and operation, weight and height at the time of surgery, body mass index, laterality, incision method, type of hydrocele, patent PV status, and hydrocele wall thickening (visually determined intraoperatively), and operation time. Transient scrotal edema, transient postoperative hydrocele, and ipsilateral recurrence of hydrocele were excluded from the study. We defined the types of PV as obliterated, partially patent, and totally patent types. Hydrocele was categorized into communicating (with partially or totally patent PV) and noncommunicating (with obliterated PV) according to the type of PV (Fig. 1). Communicating hydroceles with patent PV was determined by directly examining open communication between the scrotal sac and the peritoneum in the surgical field. If the PV was partially obliterated inside the inguinal canal, it was defined as communicating hydroceles with partially patent PV. This category includes funicular hydrocele with cord hydrocele or funicular hydrocele with scrotal hydrocele. Noncommunicating hydroceles had no connection between the abdominal cavity and the scrotal sac.
Fig. 1

Classification of PV-related disorders.

PV = processus vaginalis.
jkms-38-e79-g001
We divided the patients into two groups according to the presence of metachronous contralateral hydroceles and analyzed the differences between the two groups.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 26.0; IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) with the Mann-Whitney test, Fisher’s exact test, or Spearman’s correlation. The patients’ data were analyzed using nonparametric tests, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

After obtaining approval from Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (IRB No. 05-2020-265), we performed a retrospective chart review for all children who underwent unilateral hydrocelectomy at our institution. The board waived submission of informed consents.

RESULTS

Total patients

Among 302 patients, the mean age of the first visit to our hospital was 33.7 ± 20.5 months (1–94 months). An ultrasound study was conducted on 32 patients preoperatively (10.6%). The mean age of the first hydrocelectomy of the patients was 36.0 ± 19.8 months (12–96 months). The right side (60.9%) was more prevalent than the left. Approach methods for the first hydrocelectomy were 218 inguinal, 48 scrotal, 34 inguinal and scrotal incisions, and two laparoscopic approaches. Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV (44.4%) was the more common type, followed by communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV (40.1%) and noncommunicating hydrocele (15.5%). Abnormal hydrocele wall thickening was found in 83.8%, and epididymal abnormality was found in 10.6%. The mean operation time was 35.2 ± 22.2 minutes (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics at first hydrocelectomy

jkms-38-e79-i001
Characteristics Metachronous contralateral occurrence No metachronous occurrence Total P value
Patients 15 (4.9) 287 (95.0) 302 (100.0)
Age at 1st visit, mon 35.6 ± 20.8 33.6 ± 20.6 33.7 ± 20.5 0.650a
12–93 1–94 1–94
Height, cm 92.5 ± 15.9 93.5 ± 13.9 93.5 ± 14.0 0.562a
Weight, kg 14.6 ± 4.7 14.6 ± 4.4 14.6 ± 4.4 0.965a
BMI, kg/m2 17.3 ± 3.9 16.8 ± 3.6 16.8 ± 3.6 0.273a
At 1st hydrocelectomy
Age, mon 36.4 ± 20.9 35.9 ± 19.8 36 ± 19.8 0.662a
12–94 12–96 12–96
Laterality 0.940b
Right 9 (60.0) 175 (60.9) 184 (60.9)
Left 6 (40.0) 112 (39.0) 118 (39.0)
Incision 0.493b
Inguinal 13 (86.6) 205 (71.5) 218 (72.1)
Inguinal and scrotal 0 (0.0) 34 (11.8) 34 (11.2)
Scrotal 2 (13.3) 46 (16.0) 48 (15.8)
Laparoscopic 0 (0.0) 2 (0.6) 2 (0.6)
Hydrocele type 0.047b
Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 8 (53.3) 113 (39.3) 121 (40.1)
Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 3 (20.0) 131 (45.6) 134 (44.4)
Non-communicating hydrocele 4 (26.7) 43 (14.9) 47 (15.5)
Total 15 (100.0) 287 (100.0) 302 (100.0)
Operation time, min 34.3 ± 18.0 35.3 ± 22.4 35.2 ± 22.2 0.860a
Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation or range.
SD = standard deviation, BMI = body mass index, PV = processus vaginalis.
aMann-Whitney U test; bPearson’s χ2 test.

Type of hydrocele according to age

The proportion of noncommunicating hydrocele (22.9% at 2 years old to 2.4% at 5–8 years old) decreased with age (P = 0.018) (Fig. 2). Noncommunicating hydrocele was not detected after 70 months.
Fig. 2

Distribution of hydrocele type according to age groups.

PV = processus vaginalis.
jkms-38-e79-g002

Metachronous contralateral occurrence vs. no metachronous occurrence group

Among 302 patients, metachronous contralateral hydrocele developed in 15 patients (4.9%). Comparison between the two groups resulted in no statistical difference in age, height and weight, laterality, incision, and operation time at first hydrocelectomy. However, the type of hydrocele (P = 0.047) showed statistical difference. Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV was less prevalent in the metachronous occurrence group than in the no metachronous occurrence group. Postoperatively, the metachronous occurrence was detected after 6 to 61 months (21.8 ± 16.9) (Table 2).
Table 2

Patient characteristics at second hydrocelectomy

jkms-38-e79-i002
Parameters Metachronous contralateral occurrence
Age, mon 62.2 ± 23.0
Time interval after 1st operation, mon 24.6 ± 17.8 (6–61)a
Laterality
Right 9 (60.0)
Left 6 (40.0)
Incision
Inguinal 13 (86.7)
Inguinal and scrotal 0 (0.0)
Scrotal 2 (13.3)
Laparoscopic 0 (0.0)
Hydrocele type
Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 5 (33.3)
Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 10 (66.6)
Non-communicating hydrocele 0 (0.0)
Total 15 (100.0)
Operation time, min 34.3 ± 18.0
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
PV = processus vaginalis.
aRanges.

Initial ultrasound study of metachronous occurrence group

Among 15 patients who developed metachronous contralateral hydrocele, 8 patients (53%) received a scrotal ultrasound study before their first hydrocelectomy. In these 8 ultrasound studies, there was no evidence of contralateral hydrocele or patent PV other than first unilateral hydroceles. Presumably, the contralateral hydrocele may have been overlooked or have not yet developed at the first hydrocelectomy.

Second hydrocelectomy

The average age at second surgery was 62.2 ± 23.0 months (6–61 months). The disease incidence was found to be higher on the right (60.0%) than on the left. The approach methods during the second hydrocelectomy were 13 inguinal, 1 scrotal, and 1 both incision. Hydrocele wall thickening was found at 81.4%, and the presence of epididymal abnormality was found at 15.2%. The mean operation time was 34.3 ± 18.0 minutes (Table 2). Even though the communicating type accounted for 73.3% at first hydrocelectomy, with 11 communicating hydroceles and 4 noncommunicating hydroceles, every case of metachronous contralateral occurrence was the communicating type (Table 3).
Table 3

Patient characteristics of metachronous contralateral hydrocele

jkms-38-e79-i003
Case number At first hydrocelectomy At second hydrocelectomy Interval of operations
Age, mon Laterality Approach Type Age, mon Laterality Approach Type
1 94 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 101 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 7
2 41 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 48 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 6
3 30 Left Inguinal Noncommunicating hydrocele 43 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 13
4 31 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 39 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 8
5 40 Right Inguinal Noncommunicating hydrocele 102 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 61
6 47 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 65 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 18
7 18 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 55 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 37
8 31 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 57 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 26
9 50 Right Scrotal Noncommunicating hydrocele 69 Left Scrotal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 18
10 12 Right Scrotal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 67 Left Scrotal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 54
11 14 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 38 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 23
12 16 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 42 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 25
13 29 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 102 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 11
14 35 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 40 Left Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with totally patent PV 13
15 59 Left Inguinal Noncommunicating hydrocele 66 Right Inguinal Communicating hydrocele with partially patent PV 7
PV = processus vaginalis.

DISCUSSION

Most hydroceles resolve with age, and surgery is considered when the hydrocele persists until the age of 2 years and does not decrease in size.12 The surgery for a communicating hydrocele is essentially the same as repairing an inguinal hernia.13 Hydrocelectomy involves an inguinal approach to make sure that there is a patent PV or inguinal hernia. Once the high ligation of the patent PV has been completed, the distal part of the hydrocele is widely opened to avoid injury to the testicle instead of completely removing the hydrocele sac to prevent recurrence, which is the method we chose in our study. Noncommunicating hydroceles are distinct from communicating hydroceles and inguinal hernias and require a scrotal incision.
According to several studies on inguinal hernia, which share a common pathophysiology with communicating hydroceles, the risk of contralateral inguinal hernia after unilateral inguinal hernia repair has been 5 to 20%.1114 Kemmotsu et al.8 found that the overall incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia was 11.6% (116 of 1,001). In boys, the incidence was 13.1%, 13.7%, and 11.7% in those under 1 year, under 2 years of age, and in total, respectively. In children, the incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia was lower (7.6%). Given this low incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia after unilateral inguinal hernia repair, the authors do not recommend contralateral exploration for infants and children with unilateral inguinal hernia.
The risk of metachronous contralateral hydrocele after unilateral hydrocelectomy may be even lower than that of inguinal hernia. There are also few reports in the literature specifically targeting hydrocelectomy, although it appears that the classic treatment of hydrocele using an inguinal approach still represents the standard of care.12 Lym et al. investigated the risk of contralateral hydrocele and inguinal hernia after unilateral hydrocelectomy in 85 children 5 to 107 months old (median age, 37). Contralateral hydrocele or inguinal hernia developed in 6 of the 89 patients (7%) 6 to 15 months (median, 12) postoperatively. They do not recommend routine contralateral exploration in children undergoing unilateral hydrocelectomy.11 We limited the present study to hydroceles only and excluded inguinal hernias. Metachronous contralateral occurrence is lower (4.9%) in hydrocele compared to inguinal hernia (7.6–11.6%) proposed in other recent studies.
Most cases of pediatric hydroceles can be diagnosed with history taking and adequate physical examination. Few patients require further radiological investigation for aid in diagnosis. Ultrasound study is known to detect contralateral patent PVs. It uses the 7.5 MHz transducer and currently is the modality of choice to aid the diagnosis of patent PVs, with a reported accuracy of 91.7%.15 Detection of the inflow of peritoneal fluid within the inguinal canal is diagnostic for a hydrocele. Preoperative ultrasound with selective contralateral patent PV closure in children can be an alternative to routine laparoscopy in detecting contralateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele development. However, the sensitivity of ultrasound detection of patent PVs have been questioned. Yip investigated the usefulness of ultrasound for detecting the closure of contralateral patent PV in 322 pediatric patients with unilateral inguinal hernia and hydrocele.16 In 96 cases (30%), contralateral patent PV was identified with ultrasound, 95% of which were affirmed intraoperatively. In this study, an inguinal ultrasound study is a valuable tool as an adjunct in pediatric inguinal hernia management by detecting contralateral patent PV with high accuracy.
To prevent metachronous contralateral occurrence after hydrocelectomy, a surgeon can offer bilateral hydrocelectomy according to the ultrasound finding. In our study, bilateral surgery was performed in cases in which bilaterality of disease was confirmed by ultrasound or physical examination at the first visit. However, metachronous contralateral occurrence also occurred in patients diagnosed with unilateral hydrocele by ultrasound study at the first visit. Therefore, we found that not all metachronous occurrences can be predicted by ultrasound study. Since it may vary depending on the experience and ability of the ultrasound examiner, clinicians should pay attention to the ultrasound findings.
Laparoscopy has been widely used to evaluate contralateral patent PV. It has been proved to be both sensitive (99.4%) and specific (99.5%) in its use.17 Bhatia et al.18 performed a total of 284 unilateral inguinal hernia repairs with laparoscopic explorations. They discovered positive findings during explorations in 65 of 171 (38%) children less than 2 years of age, 19 of 101 (20%) of children 2 to 8 years of age, and 1 of 12 children greater than 8 years of age (8%). However, the false-negative incidence of laparoscopic contralateral patent PV evaluation was low.17 Also, not every contralateral patent PV would develop into a clinically apparent inguinal hernia.1920 This led to the contralateral exploration after a unilateral inguinal hernia repair to be a controversial topic in pediatric surgery. Likewise, we do not recommend laparoscopic exploration of contralateral patent PV in communicating hydrocele patients due to the low incidence of contralateral hydroceles and the controversy in performing this method.
There are several limitations to our study. First, as this study was conducted retrospectively, our analysis may have potential biases. Because our data include only patients that need surgical treatment, cases of subclinical hydroceles and mild hydroceles that do not require surgery could be overlooked. Second, because this study was conducted in a single center, collecting cases of contralateral occurrence was challenging due to the low rate of occurrence. Because there was a great difference in sample size (15 vs. 287), the outcomes of our analysis is underpowered. For proper analysis of risk factors of metachronous occurrence, multicenter research will be beneficial. Finally, routine ultrasonography is not conducted preoperatively in our clinic, and 32.1% of patients were checked in our study. Thus, we may have overlooked contralateral hydroceles, and some cases may have been misdiagnosed as unilateral hydroceles.
In conclusion, the clinically evident risk of metachronous contralateral hydrocele after unilateral hydrocelectomy in children younger than 8 years was 4.9%. The hydrocele type of the metachronous occurrence was not always identical to the previous type of hydrocele. Regardless of the first hydrocele type, a latent communicating hydrocele on the opposite side can manifest later in life. Metachronous contralateral occurrence manifested as communicating hydroceles, including hydroceles that were initially noncommunicating. Due to the small incidence of metachronous contralateral hydrocele compared with metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia, contralateral exploration with laparoscopy or ultrasound is unnecessary. However, during the surveillance, physical examination is essential for metachronous contralateral occurrence after unilateral hydrocelectomy in children. Despite the low incidence, the possibility of metachronous contralateral hydrocele should always be consulted with parents before operation.

Notes

Funding: This study was supported by a 2021 research grant from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Chung JM.

  • Data curation: Chung JM.

  • Formal analysis: Chung JM.

  • Investigation: Kim JY, Chung JM.

  • Methodology: Chung JM.

  • Software: Chung JM.

  • Validation: Chung JM.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim JY.

  • Writing - review & editing: Kim JY, Chung JM, Lee SD.

References

1. Rafailidis V, Varelas S, Apostolopoulou F, Rafailidis D. Nonobliteration of the processus vaginalis: sonography of related abnormalities in children. J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35(4):805–818.
2. Lau ST, Lee YH, Caty MG. Current management of hernias and hydroceles. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007; 16(1):50–57. PMID: 17210483.
3. Esposito C, Escolino M, Turrà F, Roberti A, Cerulo M, Farina A, et al. Current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele in pediatric patients in laparoscopic era. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016; 25(4):232–240. PMID: 27521714.
4. Skandalakis JE, Colborn GL, Androulakis JA, Skandalakis LJ, Pemberton LB. Embryologic and anatomic basis of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Clin North Am. 1993; 73(4):799–836. PMID: 8378822.
5. Cogswell HD, Czerny EW. Treatment of hernias in infants and young children. Am Surg. 1953; 19(1):87–89. PMID: 13008022.
6. Shabbir J, Moore A, O’Sullivan JB, Delaney PV, Drumm J, Flood H, et al. Contralateral groin exploration is not justified in infants with a unilateral inguinal hernia. Ir J Med Sci. 2003; 172(1):18–19. PMID: 12760457.
7. Steinau G, Böhm G, Vaassen P, Wenzl T, Schumpelick V. Contralateral inguinal hernia in childhood and youth: which child will develop a contralateral inguinal hernia? Hernia. 2008; 12(6):631–634. PMID: 18594755.
8. Kemmotsu H, Oshima Y, Joe K, Mouri T. The features of contralateral manifestations after the repair of unilateral inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(7):1099–1102. PMID: 9694102.
9. Wang JH, Zhang W, Tou JF, Huang SJ, Liu WG, Xiong QX, et al. Incidence of pediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia in children aged ≥1 year. World J Pediatr. 2012; 8(3):256–259. PMID: 22886200.
10. Nataraja RM, Mahomed AA. Systematic review for paediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia: a decreasing concern. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011; 27(9):953–961. PMID: 21604078.
11. Lym L, Ross JH, Alexander F, Kay R. Risk of contralateral hydrocele or hernia after unilateral hydrocele repair in children. J Urol. 1999; 162(3 Pt 2):1169–1170. PMID: 10458458.
12. Wilson JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, Baskin LS. Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? J Urol. 2008; 180(4):Suppl. 1724–1727. PMID: 18721980.
13. Koski ME, Makari JH, Adams MC, Thomas JC, Clark PE, Pope JC 4th, et al. Infant communicating hydroceles--do they need immediate repair or might some clinically resolve? J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45(3):590–593. PMID: 20223325.
14. Liu CS, Chin TW, Wei CF. Intraoperative non-puncture laparoscopic examination of contralateral internal inguinal rings is feasible in children with unilateral hydrocele. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1998; 61(4):188–192. PMID: 9614776.
15. Hasanuzzaman SM, Chowdhury LH, Sarker RN, Bari MS, Talukder SA, Islam MK. Ultrasonographic evaluation of contralateral exploration of patent processus vaginalis in unilateral inguinal hernia. Mymensingh Med J. 2011; 20(2):192–196. PMID: 21522086.
16. Yip PK. Ultrasound detection and closure of contralateral patent processus vaginalis in pediatric patients with unilateral inguinal hernia and hydrocele: a longitudinal study to prove efficacy in avoiding contralateral hernia development. Hernia. 2019; 23(6):1253–1259. PMID: 31004237.
17. Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Kozinetiz C, Brandt ML. Laparoscopic evaluation of the pediatric inguinal hernia--a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(6):874–879. PMID: 9660219.
18. Bhatia AM, Gow KW, Heiss KF, Barr G, Wulkan ML. Is the use of laparoscopy to determine presence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis justified in children greater than 2 years of age? J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39(5):778–781. PMID: 15137018.
19. Brandt ML. Pediatric hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 2008; 88(1):27–43. vii–viii. PMID: 18267160.
20. Zhong H, Wang F. Contralateral metachronous hernia following negative laparoscopic evaluation for contralateral patent processus vaginalis: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014; 24(2):111–116. PMID: 24180355.
TOOLS
Similar articles