Journal List > Brain Tumor Res Treat > v.8(2) > 1516081764

Ha, Jang, Jung, Kim, Lim, Moon, and Jung: Treatment Outcome of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Petroclival Meningiomas: Retrospective Analysis of a Single Institution Experience

Abstract

Background

Although Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been widely used for intracranial meningiomas as an alternative or adjuvant treatment, guidelines have not been established for the selection of patients with petroclival meningioma (PCM) for GKRS. In this study, we reported the factors related to tumor progression and postoperative complications in PCM patients treated by GKRS, with a review of the literatures.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2019, 64 patients (52 patients for alternative and 12 patients for adjuvant treatment) with PCM underwent GKRS in our institution. The clinical and radiological factors were retrospectively analyzed. The mean radiologic follow-up duration was 58.4 months (range, 6–164 months). The mean tumor volume and diameter before GKRS were 13.4 cm3 and 2.9 cm, respectively. The median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range, 10–14 Gy) with a 50% median isodose line. Fractionation was used in 19 cases (29%, two fractionations in 5 cases & three fractionations in 14 cases).

Results

Progression was noted in 7 cases (10.9%) and the progression-free survival rates were 91.1% at 5 years and 69.6% at 10 years. Although large in volume, moderate to severe peritumoral edema and male gender were somewhat related to progression, they did not reach statistical significance. Ten patients (15.6%) developed complications after GKRS. The most common complication was cranial nerve deficit (n=8), followed by hemiparesis, cognitive dysfunction, and hydrocephalus. Large size (maximal diameter ≥5 cm) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.091, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.014–0.608; p=0.013] and multiplicity (HR 0.102, 95% CI 0.018–0.573; p=0.009) were independent factors for developing complications after GKRS.

Conclusion

GKRS can be considered an effective and safe treatment for large-volume PCM. However, for patients with large size or multiple masses, the treatment method should be determined with caution because the probability of complications after GKRS may increase.

INTRODUCTION

Petroclival meningioma (PCM), closely associated with various cranial nerves and vascular structures, frequently extends into the cavernous sinus or middle cranial fossa, leading to difficulty in exposure during surgery and relatively high surgical morbidity or mortality [12]. Even though most PCMs follow a benign clinical course, gross total resection (GTR) is considered the ideal treatment if possible. When GTR is not possible or postoperative complications are anticipated, the recent trend is to perform radiation treatment or radiosurgery by adjuvant treatment after subtotal resection [3]. In addition, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) can be conducted as an initial alternative treatment for PCM, as in skull base meningiomas. Although the effectiveness of adjuvant or alternative GKRS for PCM has already been demonstrated in several studies [345678], the precise treatment guidelines have not yet been established.
In this study, we investigated the tumor control and complication rates in patients undergoing alternative or adjuvant GKRS in our institution. In addition, considering factors influencing the therapeutic effect of GKRS, we tried to determine which patients with PCM were eligible for GKRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient population

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital, which waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study. The subjects of this study were 64 patients who underwent GKRS for PCM in our hospital from 2004 to 2019. The patients were diagnosed with meningioma by MRI and pathologic reports. To define the clinical characteristics of the patients with PCMs, clinical data at the time of GKRS, including age, sex, KPS score, the type of treatment, pretreatment symptoms, multiplicity, perilesional edema, T2 signal intensity, initial volume, maximal diameter, the use of fractionation, and the presence of progression were collected.
Progression-free survival (PFS) of PCM was defined as the interval until the progression of PCM after GKRS. After GKRS, we defined complications as permanent neurologic deficits or sequelae, not transient. If the deficit persisted longer than 6 months or needed surgical intervention, it was regarded as a permanent complication. Minor symptoms, such as headache and dizziness, controlled by usual medications were not considered complications.

Radiosurgical technique

Radiosurgery was performed as usual. After applying the Leksell stereotactic frame under local anesthesia, high-resolution MRI was performed to obtain information about the shape and volume of the tumors. The treatment plan was carried out by a neurosurgeon and a medical physicist. The median isodose line of the tumor was 50% (range, 45–50%) and the median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range, 10–14 Gy). When fractionated GKRS was needed, the number of fractions was classified as 2–3 based on the tumor status (three fractionations in 14 patients, two fractionations in 5 patients). The frame was maintained until the last irradiation fractionation was completed. The linear quadratic model was used to calculate the biologically effective dose for fractionation. Detailed methods for the fractionations appear in a previously published paper [9].

Volumetric analysis

A follow-up MRI was initially obtained 6 months after GKRS and then annual imaging was conducted for the rest of the patient's life. Tumor volume (TV) analysis was performed by Leksell GammaPlan Ver. 10.1.1 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Using the volumetric tools included in Leksell GammaPlan, we drew slice-by-slice anatomical regions of interest (ROI) in the MRI and defined the three-dimensional volume in the ROI. Since the ROI was manually outlined by freehand drawing, it was important to describe the boundary between the tumor and normal tissue. In order to more accurately contour the ROI and more accurately track changes in the TV, co-registration image studies using a reference MRI (pre-GKRS) and follow-up MRI were performed. The collaboration process was automatic and based on an algorithm consistent with mutual MRI information. The ROI for the subsequent MRI was outlined in the co-registered image window overlaid with the ROI from the reference MRI. From the ROI obtained from this image, the study produced a three-dimensional TV and calculated its size. More than 20% increase in volume compared to the initial MRI at the time of GKRS was conducted tumor progression.

Statistical analysis

PFS and the tumor control rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. For univariate analysis, Fisher's exact test or a chi-square test was used for the categorical variables, and Student's t-test was used for the continuous variables. For multivariate analysis, binary logistic regression for post-GKRS complications and Cox regression for PFS were used. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Patient population and treatment characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the clinical and radiological features of the patients. Among 64 enrolled patients, the tumor was restricted to the petroclival region in 30 patients and 34 patients showed tumor extension into other portions. GKRS was adopted as an initial alternative treatment in 52 patients and as an adjuvant treatment after surgical resection in 12 patients. Multiplicity was observed in 10 patients. The mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (range, 1–6 cm) and the mean TV was 13.4 cm3 (range, 0.4–64.9 cm3). The tumor size and volume based on 5 cm and 15 cm3, respectively, were used to classify the patients. Fifty patients had incidentally detected tumors or complained only of minor symptoms, and 14 patients had motor or sensory deficits, multiple cranial nerve signs, or brainstem signs. Moderate to severe perilesional edema was found in 14 cases on pretreatment MRI and the remaining 50 showed little or only mild edema.

Tumor control

The mean radiologic follow-up duration was 58.4 months (range, 6–164 months). The overall 5-year PFS rate was 91.1% and the 10-year PFS was 69.6% (Fig. 1). Although no clinicoradiological factor showed statistical significance, some factors, including sex, peritumoral edema, and large volume, were marginally correlated with survival benefit on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, no factor was associated with PFS (Fig. 2, Table 2).

Post-GKRS complications

Ten patients developed new symptoms after GKRS. Fifty-four out of 64 patients did not reveal any permanent neurologic deficits or sequelae, indicating a stable neurologic state of 84.4%. The most common complication was cranial nerve deficits (n=8, especially 5th and 7th cranial nerve symptoms) followed by hemiparesis, cognitive dysfunction, and hydrocephalus. The presence of multiplicity [p=0.009, hazard ratio (HR) 0.102, 95% confidential index (CI) 0.018–0.573] and large maximal diameter (p=0.013, HR 0.091, 95% CI 0.014–0.608) on pre-GKRS MRI were independent predictive factors for developing post-GKRS complications (Table 3).

Representative case 1

A 39-year-old man visited our hospital with diplopia as a chief complaint. The patient also complained of gait disturbance and 48.9 cm3 of PCM was diagnosed on the MRI. Although the tumor had a perilesional edema and an indistinct margin with the brainstem, surgical resection was recommended. The patient and his family were concerned about the possibility of postoperative complications and decided to undergo alternative GKRS. The radiosurgery was performed with three fractionations of 6 Gy and 50% isodose (total 12.7 Gy). Fifty-four months after treatment, the follow-up MRI showed a size reduction of 29.4 cm3 and a clinically stable state without discomfort. The last follow-up MRI performed at 128 months showed a well-controlled mass with a shrunken volume of 28.9 cm3. Diplopia and the gait disturbance were completely improved and there were no other complications (Fig. 3).

Representative case 2

A 58-year-old woman visited the medical center complaining of a visual field defect on the right temporal side. Mild 6th nerve palsy was also observed. MRI showed a large sized PCM invading cavernous sinus on the right side. The patient and his family wanted the alternative GKRS mainly due to mild clinical symptoms. Radiosurgery was conducted as usual, with a single session of 12 Gy and 50% isodose. The mass gradually decreased in volume on serial follow-up MRIs after the detection of internal necrosis. There were no specific complications other than mild 6th nerve palsy that appeared to be initial (Fig. 4).

Representative case 3

An 82-year-old woman visited our hospital for further evaluation of an incidentally detected mass. There were no neurological symptoms or signs. The patient wanted to undergo alternative GKRS. Fractionated GKRS was performed uneventfully (5.5 Gy/fraction, 3 fractions, and 50% isodose). Even though the TV was reduced on the early follow-up MRI, the mass gradually increased and another fractionated GKRS was performed at 5.5 Gy. There were no symptoms or patient complaints, but the follow-up MRI performed 11 years after the 1st GKRS showed progression of the mass with a volume of 32.4 cm3 (Fig. 5).

DISCUSSION

Although PCM has benign tumor characteristics, it is more likely to cause post-operative complication as it spans the clivus and petrous portions where vascular structures and cranial nerves are located. Therefore, other alternative methods may be considered when a high possibility of complications and morbidity is anticipated after surgical resection [10].
A recent study summarized the treatment outcomes of patients with PCM for 30 years in a single institution. The authors analyzed several types of multimodal treatments to establish an optimal management strategy for PCM. Interestingly, their study showed no progression for five years in both the group with GTR and the group with additional radiotherapy or radiosurgery, even without GTR. The GTR rate had been decreased since 2000 with the frequent use of GKRS as an adjuvant treatment, and the complication rate tended to decrease. The authors concluded that, considering local tumor control and postoperative quality of life, adjuvant radiosurgery after planned incomplete resection would be a good option [3]. Bernard et al. [11] conducted a retrospective study of 154 patients who underwent treatment for PCMs larger than 2.5 cm from 1984 to 2017. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year PFS were not significantly different between the GTR group and the non-GTR group with adjuvant radiation treatment (100, 90, and 75%, respectively). In the group that did not receive adjuvant radiation treatment after subtotal removal, 5-, 10-, and 15-year PFSs were clearly reduced to 71, 51 and 31%, respectively. Based on these results, it can be argued that planned subtotal resection without injury to the cranial nerves, brain stem or vascular structures, followed by radiation therapy or GKRS, especially for a difficult case anticipated to have high possibility of postsurgical complications should be performed [1213].
Recently, it has been suggested that GKRS is effective as an alternative treatment for PCMs, as it is for other intracranial meningiomas [14151617181920]. In fact, the reason neurosurgeons were reluctant to choose GKRS as the primary treatment for PCM was because of concerns regarding the injury of the cranial nerve and brain stem caused by radiation-induced toxicity. In addition, when the tumor presented with a large volume and wide extension into the multi-cranial fossa, they were concerned about a higher failure rate of GKRS. Furthermore, there are not many studies on the outcomes of GKRS for PCMs [3456782122] (Table 4).
Subach et al. [8] reported 62 patients with PCM treated by GKRS. During the median follow-up period of 37 months, only five patients (8%) developed new complications, such as cranial nerve deficits, and none had evidence of tumor progression. Flannery et al. [4] reported on 163 patients who underwent GKRS for PCMs during a 21-year interval. The median TV was 6.1 cm3 and the mean radiating dose to the tumor margin was 13 Gy. The overall 5-year PFS rate was 91% and the 10-year PFS was 86%. Among the patients who underwent primary GKRS in the study, 12 patients out of 97 showed aggravation of neurologic symptom (12.3%). Patients with tumor progression complained of facial pain, hydrocephalus, deteriorating balance, vocal cord paresis, and headache. They concluded that the tumor progression and symptom deterioration related factors were tumors over 8 cm3 and male sex. Starke et al. [7] studied 254 patients diagnosed with PCM from multiple centers. In their study, the mean volume was 7.8 cm3 (rang, 0.17–36.1 cm3), the 5-year PFS was 93%, and the 10-year PFS was 84%. Neurologically stable states after GKRS were found in 93.6% of the patients. They concluded that the predictors for tumor included increasing-interval time from diagnosis to radiosurgery, large initial TV, previous radiotherapy history, and decreasing maximal dose. The predictors for unfavorable clinical outcome included the large initial TV, male sex, previous radiotherapy history, and increasing maximal dose. Kim et al. [21] reported 94.7% and 88.9% 5-year and 10-year PFSs, respectively, with a mean TV of 6.7 cm3. Eighty-one of 89 patients (91%) showed neurologically stable states after GKRS.
In our study, the overall 5-year PFS was 91.1% and the 10 year PFS was 69.6%. Compared to other studies, the results worse, and this is because the mean TV of the study subjects was larger in our study. The mean maximum diameter was 2.9 cm (range, 1–6 cm) in our study, and the mean TV was 13.4 cm3 (range, 0.4–64.9 cm3). Complications were found in 10 out of 64 patients and 84.4% were neurologically stable, which was relatively lower than the results of other studies. Increased diameter and multiplicity were independently related with complication after GKRS. Although the clinical outcome and growth rate in multiple meningiomas has been reported to be similar to a solitary case [2324], unknown biological behaviors including inconsistent pathological features [25] in multiple meningiomas may lead to unexpected clinical outcome after GKRS. Based on our results, we concluded that GKRS was shown to be an effective and safe treatment strategy for large-sized PCMs, as an alternative or adjuvant treatment. Research on how GKRS can overcome limited situations such as large-volume tumors and the complications of surrounding structures, is ongoing. Fractionated GKRS can be considered an answer to that question [92627].
Some limitations exist in this retrospective study. It was conducted on a small number of patients in a single institution with a wide range of follow-up periods. Prospective studies with a large scale and long-term follow-up period are needed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of GKRS for PCM.
In conclusion, considering the surgical morbidity of PCM, GKRS could be considered an effective alternative or adjuvant treatment in selective patients. Although there was no predictive factor for PFS for PCM, multiplicity and large size were independent predictive factors for post-GKRS complications in our study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant (HCRI19030) of Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

References

1. Little KM, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56:546–559. PMID: 15730581.
2. Sekhar LN, Swamy NK, Jaiswal V, Rubinstein E, Hirsch WE Jr, Wright DC. Surgical excision of meningiomas involving the clivus: preoperative and intraoperative features as predictors of postoperative functional deterioration. J Neurosurg. 1994; 81:860–868. PMID: 7965116.
3. Kim JW, Jung HW, Kim YH, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: long-term outcomes of multimodal treatments and management strategies based on 30 years of experience at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2019; 132:1675–1682.
4. Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD, et al. Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2010; 112:957–964. PMID: 19731986.
5. Roche PH, Pellet W, Fuentes S, Thomassin JM, Régis J. Gamma knife radiosurgical management of petroclival meningiomas results and in dications. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003; 145:883–888. PMID: 14577010.
6. Sadik ZHA, Lie ST, Leenstra S, Hanssens PEJ. Volumetric changes and clinical outcome for petroclival meningiomas after primary treatment with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2018; 129:1623–1629. PMID: 29372884.
7. Starke R, Kano H, Ding D, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery of petroclival meningiomas: a multicenter study. J Neurooncol. 2014; 119:169–176. PMID: 24821284.
8. Subach BR, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Flickinger JC. Management of petroclival meningiomas by stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1998; 42:437–443. discussion 443-5. PMID: 9526975.
9. Han MS, Jang WY, Moon KS, et al. Is fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery a safe and effective treatment approach for large-volume (>10 cm3) intracranial meningiomas? World Neurosurg. 2017; 99:477–483. PMID: 28017757.
10. Zentner J, Meyer B, Vieweg U, Herberhold C, Schramm J. Petroclival meningiomas: is radical resection always the best option? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 62:341–345. PMID: 9120445.
11. Bernard F, Troude L, Isnard S, et al. Long term surgical results of 154 petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective multicenter study. Neurochirurgie. 2019; 65:55–62. PMID: 31104846.
12. Nanda A, Javalkar V, Banerjee AD. Petroclival meningiomas: study on outcomes, complications and recurrence rates. J Neurosurg. 2011; 114:1268–1277. PMID: 21184632.
13. Park CK, Jung HW, Kim JE, Paek SH, Kim DG. The selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy for petroclival meningiomas. Surg Neurol. 2006; 66:160–165. discussion 165-6. PMID: 16876612.
14. Bledsoe JM, Link MJ, Stafford SL, Park PJ, Pollock BE. Radiosurgery for large-volume (>10 cm3) benign meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2010; 112:951–956. PMID: 19764829.
15. Chang JH, Chang JW, Choi JY, Park YG, Chung SS. Complications after gamma knife radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003; 74:226–230. PMID: 12531956.
16. DiBiase SJ, Kwok Y, Yovino S, et al. Factors predicting local tumor control after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for benign intracranial meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60:1515–1519. PMID: 15590183.
17. Eustacchio S, Trummer M, Fuchs I, Schröttner O, Sutter B, Pendl G. Preservation of cranial nerve function following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas: experience in 121 patients with follow-up of 5 to 9.8 years. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002; 84:71–76. PMID: 12379007.
18. Faramand A, Kano H, Niranjan A, et al. Cranial nerve outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2018; 139:341–348. PMID: 29691775.
19. Kondziolka D, Patel AD, Kano H, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Long-term outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016; 39:453–457. PMID: 24755664.
20. Starke RM, Williams BJ, Hiles C, Nguyen JH, Elsharkawy MY, Sheehan JP. Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2012; 116:588–597. PMID: 22175723.
21. Kim JW, Kim DG, Se YB, et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for petroclival meningioma: long-term outcome and failure pattern. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017; 95:209–215. PMID: 28683438.
22. Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60:965–979. PMID: 17538370.
23. Lynch JC, Ferreira LA, Welling L, Schulz RC. Multiple intracranial meningiomas: diagnosis, biological behavior and treatment. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008; 66:702–707. PMID: 18949266.
24. Wong RH, Wong AK, Vick N, Farhat HI. Natural history of multiple meningiomas. Surg Neurol Int. 2013; 4:71. PMID: 23776757.
25. Koh YC, Yoo H, Whang GC, Kwon OK, Park HI. Multiple meningiomas of different pathological features: case report. J Clin Neurosci. 2001; 8 Suppl 1:40–43.
26. Chung LK, Mathur I, Lagman C, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in benign meningioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2017; 36:1–5. PMID: 27815026.
27. Joshi KC, Raghavan A, Muhsen B, et al. Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: a single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2019; 46:E8.
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curves showing the progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative survival of the enrolled patients in this study (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). The overall 5-year PFS rate was 91.1% and the 10-year PFS was 69.6%.

btrt-8-83-g001
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves showing progression-free survival (PFS) according to different predictors (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). The number on the right upper of each curve represents the p-value. A: sex, B: fractionation, C: T2 signal intensity (SI), D: perilesional edema, E: maximal diameter, F: tumor volume.

btrt-8-83-g002
Fig. 3

Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRIs in a 38-year-old man with diplopia. Fractionated GKRS was performed for the tumor, gradually decreasing in the tumor volume from 48.9 cm3 to 28.9 cm3, without neurological complications. GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

btrt-8-83-g003
Fig. 4

Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRIs for a 58-year-old woman with 6th nerve palsy. Single-session GKRS was performed for the tumor, gradually decreasing in the tumor volume from 48.3 cm3 to 21.7 cm3. There was no neurological aggravation during the follow-up period. GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

btrt-8-83-g004
Fig. 5

Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRIs for an 82-year-old woman with incidentally detected petroclival meningioma. Fractionated GKRS was performed for the tumor. The tumor initially decreased in volume but eventually progressed despite a 2nd GKRS. GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

btrt-8-83-g005
Table 1

Clinicoradiological characteristics of 64 patients with petroclival meningioma

btrt-8-83-i001
Characteristic Values
Age
 <65 yr 25 (39.0)
 ≥65 yr 39 (61.0)
Sex
 Male 23 (35.9)
 Female 41 (64.1)
Treatment
 Alternative GKRS 52 (81.2)
 Adjuvant GKRS 12 (18.8)
Multiplicity
 Single 54 (84.3)
 Multiple 10 (15.7)
Cranial nerve symptom
 No or mild 50 (78.1)
 Severe 14 (21.9)
Location
 Restricted to petroclivus 30 (46.9)
 Extended to around structures 34 (53.1)
KPS
 ≥90 56 (87.5)
 <90 8 (12.5)
Fractionation
 Single 45 (70.3)
 Fractionated 19 (29.6)
Perilesional edema
 None or mild 50 (78.1)
 Moderate to severe 14 (21.9)
T2 signal
 High 45 (70.3)
 Low or iso 19 (29.7)
Maximal diameter (cm)
 <3 36 (56.3)
 3 to <4 14 (21.9)
 4 to <5 7 (10.9)
 ≥5 7 (10.9)
Initial volume (cm3)
 <10 38 (59.4)
 10 to <15 4 (6.2)
 15 to <20 9 (14.1)
 ≥20 13 (20.3)
Median age (yr) 62 (27–88)
Median KPS 90 (50–100)
Median isodose line (%) 50 (45–50)
Median marginal dose (Gy) 12 (10–14)
Number of fractionations 19 (29)
 2 fractionations 5
 3 fractionations 14
Mean max diameter (cm) 2.9 (1–6)
Mean tumor volume (cm3) 13.4 (0.4–64.9)

Data are presented as number (%), median (range), or mean (range). GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery; KPS, Karnofsky performance score

Table 2

Statistical analyses for progression-free survival of the patients with petroclival meningioma

btrt-8-83-i002
Variable Volume change Survival (month) p-value HR 95% CI
Stable Increase Univariate Multivariate
Age 0.911 0.500 ND ND
 <65 yr 21 (84) 4 (16) 121.4±7.5
 ≥65 yr 36 (92) 3 (18) 123.5±11.4
Sex 1.000 0.725 ND ND
 Male 19 (83) 4 (17) 108.3±15.6
 Female 38 (93) 3 (7) 122.1±5.4
Treatment 0.350 0.800 ND ND
 Alternative GKRS 47 (90) 5 (10) 123.9±5.8
 Adjuvant GKRS 10 (83) 2 (17) 102.2±22.8
Multiplicity 0.452 0.850 ND ND
 Single 48 (89) 6 (11) 123.4±8.1
 Multiple 9 (90) 1 (10) 131.3±0.5
Cranial nerve symptom 0.585 0.775 ND ND
 No or mild 45 (90) 5 (10) 127.7±7.4
 Severe 12 (86) 2 (14) 112.2±14.9
Location 0.547 0.450 ND ND
 Petroclivus 28 (93) 2 (7) 123.9±6.6
 Extended 29 (85) 5 (15) 121.8±9.6
KPS 0.314 0.900 ND ND
 ≥90 49 (87) 7 (13) ND
 <90 8 (100) 0 (0) ND
Fractionation 0.212 0.675 ND ND
 Single 42 (93) 3 (7) 132.0±6.8
 Fractionated 15 (79) 4 (21) 105.0±13.5
Perilesional edema 0.185 0.725 ND ND
 None or mild 47 (94) 3 (6) 124.7±4.5
 Moderate to severe 10 (71) 4 (29) 107.2±16.1
T2 signal 0.263 0.750 ND ND
 High 39 (86) 6 (14) 113.6±6.8
 Low or iso 18 (95) 1 (5) 140.2±5.8
Maximal diameter 0.261 0.850 ND ND
 <5 cm 53 (93) 4 (7) 130.4±7.4
 ≥5 cm 4 (57) 3 (43) 109.0±15.7
Initial volume 0.133 0.575 ND ND
 <15 cm3 41 (98) 1 (2) 124.8±6.7
 ≥15 cm3 16 (73) 6 (27) 115.6±10.9

Data are presented as number (%) or mean±SD unless otherwise indicated. HR, hazard ratio; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery; KPS, Karnofsky performance score; ND, non-detected

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for post-GKRS new onset symptoms from the treatment for petroclival meningioma

btrt-8-83-i003
Variable Complication p-value HR 95% CI
No Yes Univariate Multivariate
Age 0.523 0.767 ND ND
 <65 yr 22 (88.0) 3 (12.0)
 ≥65 yr 32 (82.1) 7 (17.9)
Sex 0.670 0.453 ND ND
 Male 20 (87.0) 3 (13.0)
 Female 34 (82.9) 7 (17.1)
Treatment 0.440 0.877 ND ND
 Alternative GKRS 43 (82.7) 9 (17.3)
 Adjuvant GKRS 11 (91.7) 1 (8.3)
Multiplicity 0.021 0.009 0.102 0.018–0.573
 Single 48 (88.9) 6 (11.1)
 Multiple 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0)
Cranial nerve symptom 0.876 0.350 ND ND
 No or mild 42 (84.0) 8 (16.0)
 Severe 12 (85.7) 2 (14.3)
Location 0.365 0.115 ND ND
 Petroclivus 24 (80) 6 (20)
 Extended 30 (88.2) 4 (11.8)
KPS 0.193 0.095 ND ND
 ≥90 46 (82.1) 10 (17.9)
 <90 8 (100) 0 (0)
Fractionation 0.437 0.969 ND ND
 Single 39 (86.7) 6 (13.3)
 Fractionated 15 (78.9) 4 (21.1)
Perilesional edema 0.499 0.916 ND ND
 None or mild 43 (86.0) 7 (14.0)
 Moderate to severe 11 (78.6) 3 (21.4)
T2 signal 0.437 0.973 ND ND
 High 15 (78.9) 4 (21.1)
 Low to iso 39 (86.7) 6 (13.3)
Maximal diameter 0.035 0.013 0.091 0.014–0.608
 <5 cm 50 (87.7) 7 (12.3)
 ≥5 cm 4 (57.1) 3 (42.9)
Initial volume 0.257 0.973 ND ND
 <15 cm3 37 (88.1) 5 (11.9)
 ≥15 cm3 17 (77.3) 5 (22.7)

Data are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated. HR, hazard ratio; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; ND, non-detected; GKRS, Gamma Knife radiosurgery; KPS, Karnofsky performance score

Table 4

Comparison of Gamma Knife radiosurgery outcomes and tumor control and complications related factors in selected studies

btrt-8-83-i004
Progression free survival (%) Patients (alternative/adjuvant) Mean tumor volume (cm3) Mean marginal dose (Gy) Mean radiological follow up (month) Volume change (progression state) (%) Aggravation of neurologic symptom (%) Related factors
Tumor control related factors Complication related factors
Starke et al. [7] 93 (5 yr) 254 (140/114) 7.8 (0.17–36.1) 13.4 (9–40) 71 (6–252) 9 13 Time from symptom onset, volume, prior radiation therapy, maximal dose Volume, male gender, prior radiation therapy, increasing maximal dose
84 (10 yr)
Flannery et al. [4] 91 (5 yr) 163 (97/66) 6.1 (0.3–32.5) 13 (9–18) 64 (3–204) 10 12.3 Volume >8 cm3, male Volume >8 cm3, male
86 (10 yr)
Roche et al. [5] 100 (5 yr) 32 (24/8) 2.3 (0.25–6.0) 13 (10–15) 52.6 (24–118) 0 6 ND Large volume, vascular involvement, brainstem compression
Kim et al. [21] 94.7 (5 yr) 89 (58/31) 6.7 (0.5–46.3) 13.2 (8–17) 68 (3–195) 5.6 9 ND Cystic formation, brainstem compression
88.9 (10 yr)
Sadik et al. [6] 98 (5 yr) 53 (53/0) ND 13 (11–15) 59 (12–147) 2 5 ND Trigeminal pain score
93 (7 yr)
Our study 91.1 (5 yr) 64 (52/12) 13.4 (0.4–64.9) 12* (10–14) 58.4 (6–164) 10.9 15.6 ND Maximal dimeter (>5 cm), multiplicity
69.6 (10 yr)

*median marginal dose, median tumor volume. ND, non-detected

TOOLS
Similar articles