Abstract
Background
The aims of this study are to review data on 4-months age National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children (NHSPIC) using a National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, and to analyze the newborn hearing screening (NHS) results and related characteristics of the 4-months NHSPIC for 7 years in South Korea.
Methods
We analyzed a NHIS database of infants who had participated in the 4-month age NHSPIC from 2010 to 2016. According to the results of hearing questionnaires and physical examination, we analyzed the outcomes of NHS and related infantile and socioeconomic factors.
Results
Among 3,128,924 of total eligible infants in Korea between the year 2010 and 2016, 69.2% (2,164,621 infants) conducted 4-months age NHSPIC, and 94.4% (2,042,577 infants) of which performed hearing questionnaires regarding NHS. Among the total hearing examinees, premature infants accounted for 3.6%, infants who were hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for more than 5 days accounted for 5.6%, and infants with head and neck abnormalities were 0.6%. The NHS performing rate was 79.1% for total hearing examinees in 2010, but gradually increased to 88.9% in 2016. The NHS performing rate in 2016 was 93.4% for premature infants, 91.7% for NICU hospitalized babies. The mean referral rate was 0.6% for total hearing examinees, 1.4% for premature infants, and 2.3% for NICU hospitalized babies. When we analyzed the NHS performing rate and the referral rate according to the household income level, the NHS performing rate of infants in Medical Aid programs was the lowest as 65.6%, and the NHS performing rates in other five levels of NHIS was higher ranging between 85.1% to 86.0%. The referral rate of infants in the Medical Aid program (3.8%) was significantly higher than those of infants in other classes (1.10–1.25%).
Conclusion
The estimated overall NHS performing rate in Korea gradually increased and was 88.9% in 2016. The overall referral rate was low as 0.6%, and it was significantly different depending on the infant’s health condition and household income levels. We assume that our finding would help to establish policies managing hearing impaired children, and to develop the customized hearing care service programs considering the household economic levels.
Graphical Abstract
The future hope of the society is children, and the health of children is very important in maintaining the society. Infancy and childhood show the rapid growth and development over a lifetime, and the hearing during this period is very important for the language and the cognitive function development.12 The interest in infants and children’s health has led to the establishment of a periodic infant and toddler health management system in developed countries. Japan has been conducting infant health checkups since 1969 limited to low-income families, and since 1973 it has been implemented for all infants and toddlers. The checkup period in Japan is 3–4 months, 6–7 months, 18 months, and 3 years old; especially the 18 months and the 3 years examinations are mandatory by the Maternal and Child Health Act.3 Infant and child checkups in Germany are conducted nine times in preschool period and until a child’s 14th year.4 The United States Government’s Infant and Toddler Screening is an early and periodic screening, diagnostic and treatment program through the Medicaid for low-income children, and the subjects are children and adolescents from 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 2 years to 20 years old.5
Korea has the lowest total fertility rate as 0.92 in 2019 among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries due to an aging population and the decrease in the fertile female population, and as a result, the population of infants and toddlers continues to decrease.6 With an aging Korean society and low birth rate, the Korean government realized the importance of providing an environment which guarantees the healthy birth and the well-being of the infants and children of the nation. Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) introduced the National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children (NHSPIC) since 2007.7 This is a children population surveillance program which contains physical examinations and measurements, the screening for visual acuity, and questionnaires regarding anticipatory guidance, developmental issues, and hearing for infants and children in the following age groups: 4 months, 9 months, 18 months, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, and 6 years old.
The universal hearing screening program for newborns (newborn hearing screening; NHS) was also implemented in October 2018 with the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) coverage in South Korea. Prior to 2018, the government recognized the significance of NHS and had initiated a nationwide NHS program since 2007, but the programs were primarily for newborns of low-income families. Accordingly, there was no official statistics to identify how many newborns had performed NHS tests in the country before the NHIS coverage, because most caregivers paid the screening tests at their own expenses and test results were shared only between the parents and hospitals. However, as NHSPIC were conducted since 2007 and there are questionnaires asking NHS test results, we could analyze the results of NHS in these periods.8 Herein, we investigated the results of the hearing questionnaires, physical examination, and the NHS status of infants who participated in the 4-months NHSPIC for 7 years (from 2010 to 2016) in Korea.
The study used nationwide population data of total 2,164,621 infants who underwent the 4-months NHSPIC from January 2010 to December 2016 using the NHIS information database. The 4-months NHSPIC contains history taking, physical examination and measurement, questionnaires of the anticipatory guidance, developmental issues, visual and hearing states. We collected the results of the date of birth, birth weight, the expected due date for checking premature state, physical examination of head and neck (head, face, nose, external ear, ear drum, and oral cavity) and three hearing questionnaires which inquired whether infant had been hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) more than 5 days, had performed NHS test and how the result of NHS was (Fig. 1). The household income classification of this study was based on health insurance premiums: beneficiaries of the Medical Aid program were the lowest grade, and the national health insurance beneficiaries were divided into quintiles (the first quintile means the bottom 20%, and the fifth quintile means the top 20%).
We analyzed the participation rate of the 4-month NHSPIC, the hearing screening rate of NHSPIC, and the abnormality rate of the head and neck examination. We also investigated the NHS performing rates and referral rates according to the total infants, premature infants, infants who were admitted to the NICU for more than 5 days, and the household income levels using the results of the hearing questionnaires in the NHSPIC.
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). In the results, the continuous variable presented mean and standard deviation, and the categorical variable presented the frequency (%) value. Statistical significance was set to P values < 0.05. The statistical significance was assessed by Pearson χ2 test or Wilcoxon-test.
This study was performed by the committee of the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and reviewed and confirmed by the Korean Audiological Society. As a representative hospital, the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB file No. HKS 2016-08-105). The confidentiality of the infants was protected, and their information was anonymized and de-identified before analysis. Thus, informed consent was waived by the IRB because of retrospective database study nature.
For 7 years, 2,164,621 infants participated in the 4-months NHSPIC, which accounted for 69.2% of the total eligible infants (infants who were able to participate the 4-months NHSPIC during 2010–2016). In 2010, 56.6% (248,242 infants) of the eligible subjects participated in the NHSPIC, but the participation rate gradually increased, and in 2016, 80.3% (340,351) of the eligible subjects participated. The mean age of the total participants was 5.58 ± 0.89 months old, and the mean body weight was 3.19 ± 0.46 kg (Table 1).
The total number of total hearing examinees with hearing questionnaires was 2,042,577, which accounted for 94.4% of the total participants (infants who participated the 4-months NHSPIC during 2010–2016) in the NHSPIC. Of the total hearing examinees (infants who participated hearing questionnaires in the 4-months NHSPIC during 2010–2016), total premature infants and total infants who were hospitalized in NICU for more than 5 days were 72,851 (3.6%) and 114,690 (5.6%), respectively. The mean proportion of boys of each group was 52.5% in premature infants and 56.1% in infants who were admitted in the NICU for more than 5 days (Table 1).
Among all hearing examinees, the NHS performing rate (response “yes” to question whether the baby received a hearing screening test in the newborn period; Fig. 1) was 79.1% in 2010, and gradually increased to 88.9% in 2016. The average NHS performing rate for 7 years was 85.3%. Of the infants who were hospitalized in the NICU for more than 5 days, the NHS performing rate was 81.9% in 2010 and 91.7% in 2016, and the average NHS performing rate was 87.7%. The NHS performing rates in the premature infants were 83.5% in 2010 and 93.4% in 2016, and the mean NHS performing rate was 89.2%. The NHS performing rates steadily increased every year in all groups (Table 2, Fig. 2A).
The referral rates of the NHS test for the total hearing examinees, infants who stayed in the NICU for more than 5 days, and preterm infants were 0.6% (range, 0.5–0.8%), 2.3% (range, 1.9–2.6%), and 1.4% (range, 1.2–1.9%), respectively. The referral rates of infants who were admitted to NICU more than 5 days and premature infants were higher than those of overall hearing examinees (P = 0.006) (Table 2, Fig. 2B).
Among the total hearing examinees, the average rate of the head and neck abnormalities in the physical examination was 0.6% (Table 1). Infants who did not pass the NHS tests had significantly higher rate of the head and neck abnormalities than infants who had passed the NHS tests (P < 0.001, χ2 test) (Fig. 3).
When we analyzed the proportion of hearing examinees based on health insurance premiums of their households, the infants in the Medical Aid program accounted for 0.76% of the total, and the infants in the 3rd quintile of the NHIS comprised 32.6% of the total which was the highest proportion (Table 3). The NHS performing rate of infants in Medical Aid programs was the lowest ranging from 58.6% to 76.7% (P < 0.001), and the NHS performing rates in other five levels of NHIS gradually increased each year reaching the highest in 2015 as from 89.8% to 90.0% (Fig. 4A). The mean referral rate of infants in Medical Aid programs was 3.1% ranging from 1.3% to 5.9% each year and was the highest among total infants when compared to other five levels of NHIS groups (P = 0.008 [1st quintile], P = 0.008 [2nd quintile], P = 0.009 [3rd quintile], P = 0.010 [4th quintile], and 0.009 [5th quintile], respectively); the mean referral rates of infants in the other NHIS groups was 1.2% (Fig. 4B).
In Korea, the NHSPIC has been conducted since 2007, and it includes the preventive education for the health promotion of infants and children from birth through six years old. In the 4-months NHSPIC, there are hearing checkups by questionnaires which are meaningful in that they remind the importance of the hearing screening in the newborn period and the regular hearing checkups for infants who have risk factors for hearing loss. As for the NHS, there was a government-funded support for low-income class families prior to October 2018, but the NHS test was not yet supported to all the households as a national health insurance, therefore the parents themselves decided to perform the screening test and paid for it. However, the government-funded NHS pilot project which has been conducted from 2007 had helped to improve the national awareness of the NHS. As a result, the NHS performing rate had increased as the NHSPIC’s examination year went on; the NHS performing rate of the infants who participated in the 4-month NHSPIC was 79.1% in 2010, but it rose to 88.9% in 2016. In our study, the NHS performing rates in premature infants and in infants who were hospitalized for more than 5 days in NICU were higher than that of the overall infants. It is possible that due to the severity and the long hospitalization period in these infant groups compared to healthy newborns, there might have been sufficient time to inform parents and conduct the NHS test. But further studies are needed to find out more detailed causes.
In the present study, the overall average referral rates were 0.5% to 0.8%. Considering that the ideal referral rate suggested by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) and various NHS guidelines is 1% to 4%,91011 our overall referral rate was relatively low. The low referral rates of the NHS tests in Korea were also seen in the results of government-supported NHS pilot projects, and it is presumed to be due to the behavior of some screeners’ repeating the NHS tests more than three times.12 According to the informal survey performed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2010, it is reported that the maternity clinics which comprise 91.4% of hearing screening institution in Korea,1213 had misconceptions in the beginning of the NHS program, misunderstood the screening tests for a confirmation test and performed the screening tests more than three times repeatedly. The manner of repeating the screening test for multiple times has a problem in that it lowers the referral and leads to false negative. The JCIH recommends that the screening test should be performed maximum twice, as it is possible to accidentally achieve a “pass” result when repeating the automated screening test.91415 Subsequently, the Otolaryngology Society established annual off-line NHS workshops, an online NHS training site development (2013) and the publication of NHS guidelines and position statement (2010 and 2018) to increase the investigator proficiency.11
The referral rates for premature infants and the infants admitted to the NICU for more than 5 days were 1.4% (1.2–1.9%) and 2.3% (1.9–2.6%) respectively, which is higher than the overall mean referral rate (0.5–0.8%). It is in accordance with other reported referral rates of NICU neonates which are 2.8–9.2% and much higher than overall referral rate.1316171819 It is noted that the referral rate increases with raised incident of hearing loss and that NICU neonates show a high incidence of hearing loss, at a rate 10 times greater than that of well-babies.1320 In this study, the total infants were divided into the ‘pass group’ and the ‘refer group,’ and the proportion of head and neck abnormalities in the physical examination were analyzed. We identified that the head and neck abnormalities were statistically significantly higher in the ‘refer group’ than in the ‘pass group.’ External ear anomalies such as pre-auricular pit, lob ear, microtia or congenital atresia might occur with middle ear or inner ear anomalies. Congenital atresia is reported to have 12% of abnormal inner ear findings in radiologic examination.2122 Cleft lip and cleft palate is commonly associated with otitis media with effusion and conductive hearing loss. Since head and neck anomalies have a tendency to accompany conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss or mixed hearing loss, it can be advised to the parents to have continuous hearing check-up when neonates have head and neck anomalies.
In the present study, the classification of income level was divided into a total of six groups, which were the Medical Aid group and five health insurance groups based on the health insurance premiums. The proportion of newborns and infants was not evenly distributed according to their classification. The Medical Aid group had the lowest percentage of infants (0.76%), and the health insurance groups had the highest percentage of infants in the order of 3rd (32.55%), 4th (24.43%), 2nd (18.30%), 1st (12.27%), and 5th (11.68%) quintile (the first quintile means the bottom 20%, and the fifth quintile the top 20%). Since the ratio of infants are not evenly distributed according to the household income levels as in our study (the 3rd quintile had the highest rate of infants as 32.6%), the governmental policy to support the target group should consider the actual rate of infants in the households. For example, if there is a policy to support up to the 3rd quartile of income level according to the health insurance from bottom, a budget to cover 64% of all infants should be prepared. However, if the policy was applied to the lower 2nd quintile, the budget to support 31% of all infants is required.
In this study, the NHS performing rates and referral rates were significantly different depending on the household income level. The Medical Aid group had a significantly lower NHS performing rate and the higher referral rate than the health insurance groups. Considering that government-funded NHS low-income household supporting NHS programs were going on during these periods, it can be assumed that the newborns or infants of the Medical Aid group still had difficulties visiting hospitals due to lack of time, or awareness about the NHS program. Currently (after the year 2018), the NHS test is covered by national health insurance up to two times, so there are no needs to pay for the test by the parents, which means that the economic burden for the hearing screening tests is reduced. In the future, further studies are needed to investigate the NHS performing rate according to the income level, the place of household residence and the screening institutions. Additional research is also needed to examine the reasons for the higher referral rate 3.1% (1.3–5.9%) of the Medical Aid group compared to the health insurance group 1.2%.
There are some limitations to the present study. First, it does not directly analyze the data of NHS but indirectly evaluate the data based on the questionnaires of NHSPIC for 4-months infants. That is, there might be dropouts (infants participated in NHS but have not participated in NHSPIC at-4 months of age) or a recall bias (NHS results are dependent on parents’ memories). Second, although we identified that the performing rates were low and the referral rates were high in infants enrolled in Medical Aid programs, we could not recognize the causes in this study. We need to examine the regional distribution of families enrolled in Medical Aid programs, and to inspect the parental awareness of NHS among these families in the future.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the results of NHS in total neonates before it was covered by the national insurance and became UNHS in Korea. Since approximately 80% of the total eligible infants participated in the 4-months NHSPIC in 2016, it is assumed that this data represents the overall NHS result in Korea. The estimated overall NHS performing rate was 88.9%, the overall referral rate was 0.6%, and it was significantly different depending on the infant’s health condition and household income levels. We assume that our finding would help to establish policies managing hearing impaired children, and to develop the customized hearing care service programs considering the household economic levels.
Notes
Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Korean Audiological Society (2017).
References
1. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(5):1161–1171. PMID: 9794949.
2. Evelyn C. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol. 2000; 9(1):9–29.
3. Japan Healthcare info. Baby checkups. Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://japanhealthinfo.com/child-health-and-childcare/baby-checkups
.
4. Pediatric Practice Berlin. Preventive check-ups. Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://www.kinderarzt-berlin-zia.de/en/preventive-check-ups
.
5. Council on Children with Disabilities. Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics. Bright Futures Steering Committee. Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1):405–420. PMID: 16818591.
6. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Vital statistics. Projected population by age (Korea). Updated December 9, 2021. Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B08024&vw_cd=MT_ETITLE&list_id=A1_13&scrId=&seqNo=&language=en&lang_mode=en&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ETITLE&path=Population%2520%253E%2520Population%2520Census%2520%253E%2520Population%2520Density
.
7. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Introduction to manual revision of the National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children (NHSPIC). Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://www.kdca.go.kr/filepath/boardDownload.es?bid=0034&list_no=62341&seq=1
.
8. Lee J, Rhee J, Park SK, Chang J, Kim JS, Park KH, et al. Development of a more effective Hearing Screening Questionnaire for Infants and Children during medical check-ups. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2016; 59(4):273–280.
9. American Academy of Pediatrics. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(4):898–921. PMID: 17908777.
10. Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, Trunkel D, Ziring P. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998-1999. Pediatrics. 1999; 103(2):527–530. PMID: 9925859.
11. The Korean Audiological Society. Korean Newborn Hearing Screening Guideline Update. 2nd ed. Seoul, Korea: Korean Audiological Society;2018.
12. Chung YS, Oh SH, Park SK. Referral rates for newborn hearing screening based on the test time. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 127:109664. PMID: 31521889.
13. Chang J, Oh SH, Park SK. Comparison of newborn hearing screening results between well babies and neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 5 days: Analysis based on the national database in Korea for 9 years. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0235019. PMID: 32559227.
14. Washington State Department of Health. Protocol for newborn hearing screening, 2022. Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/Pubs/344-023_E HDDINBScrnProto.pdf
.
15. Tennessee Department of Health. Newborn hearing screening guidelines for hospitals and birthing centers, 2009. Accessed October 10, 2022.
https://www.infanthearing.org/stateguidelines/Tennessee/Screening%20Guidelines.pdf
.
16. Mason JA, Herrmann KR. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(2):221–228. PMID: 9445495.
17. van Dommelen P, van Straaten HL, Verkerk PH. Dutch NICU Neonatal Hearing Screening Working Group. Ten-year quality assurance of the nationwide hearing screening programme in Dutch neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100(8):1097–1103. PMID: 21342253.
18. Colella-Santos MF, Hein TA, de Souza GL, do Amaral MI, Casali RL. Newborn hearing screening and early diagnostic in the NICU. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014:845308. PMID: 24999481.
19. Li PC, Chen WI, Huang CM, Liu CJ, Chang HW, Lin HC. Comparison of newborn hearing screening in well-baby nursery and NICU: a study applied to reduce referral rate in NICU. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152028. PMID: 27023324.
20. Martínez-Cruz CF, Poblano A, Fernández-Carrocera LA. Risk factors associated with sensorineural hearing loss in infants at the neonatal intensive care unit: 15-year experience at the National Institute of Perinatology (Mexico City). Arch Med Res. 2008; 39(7):686–694. PMID: 18760198.
21. Vrabec JT, Lin JW. Inner ear anomalies in congenital aural atresia. Otol Neurotol. 2010; 31(9):1421–1426. PMID: 21113986.
22. Park E, Lee G, Jung HH, Im GJ. Analysis of inner ear anomalies in unilateral congenital aural atresia combined with microtia. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 12(2):176–180. PMID: 30403837.