INTRODUCTION
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is one of the systemic vasculitides that involves the smallest vessels, such as the capillaries, arterioles, and venules [
1]. AAV is categorized into the following three subtypes; microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA), according to its clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological features [
2,
3]. AAV treatment consists of two steps, namely induction therapy and maintenance therapy. Currently, cyclophosphamide or rituximab (RTX) with glucocorticoids is strongly recommended as an induction therapeutic regimen for patients with organ-threatening disease, whereas methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil together with glucocorticoids is recommended for patients with non–organ-threatening disease [
4-
7]. In addition, after remission, azathioprine, methotrexate, or RTX along with tapered glucocorticoids for more than 2 years are currently recommended [
4,
7,
8].
Recently, a study reported that the incidence rate of severe infections increased in patients with AAV receiving RTX during the first 12 months of follow-up, and age and serum creatinine level were independently associated with severe infections [
9]. Given that the incidence rate of serious infection and mortality rate in AAV patients may differ based on ethnic and geographical diversity, it is worthwhile to investigate the proportion of Korean patients with AAV affected by serious adverse events and their clinical impact [
10]. Hence, in this study, we investigated the clinical implication of serious infection in AAV patients receiving RTX during the first 6 months of follow-up.
DISCUSSION
There were two reasons for investigating the incidence rate of serious infections and its influence on all-cause mortality in patients with AAV receiving RTX only during the first 6 months of follow-up. One was the reimbursement of the medical expenses. Until November 2020, only the reimbursement for RTX infusion as an induction therapy, but not as maintenance therapy, was approved by the Korean National Health Insurance Service. For this reason, most patients with AAV included in this study received only one cycle of RTX infusion (weekly for 4 weeks) as induction therapy under medical insurance. The other is an increased chance of confounding factors contribute to the occurrence of serious infections, such as elevated cumulative doses of glucocorticoids and rituximab, the possibility of worsening of AAV, and an increase in age, leading to increased susceptibility to infections.
There has been known to be that age, smoking, pulmonary involvement, immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophophamide, and dose of corticosteroid can increase the risk of infection those who administered with RTX in AAV patients.
Therefore, it was expected that the first 6 months of follow-up would yield clear results.
Serious infections were clearly and independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients with AAV receiving RTX. Therefore, if a factor to predict the occurrence of serious infections at the first RTX infusion can be identified, it will be possible to improve the clinical course by reducing the possibility of all-cause mortality during the first 6 months of follow-up. To obtain independent predictive factors at the time of initiating RTX for the occurrence of serious infections during the first 6 months of follow-up, Cox hazards model analysis for serious infections was conducted. However, in this study, no statistically significant predictors of the occurrence of serious infections were identified (
Supplementary Table 1).
We also investigated the effect of high-dose glucocorticoids on the occurrence of serious infection in AAV patients receiving the first cycle of RTX. First of all, when ‘high-dose glucocorticoids’ is considered as a dose of 1 mg/day equivalent to prednisolone, ‘high-dose glucocorticoids’ was administered to AAV patients only during the first four weeks of the first cycle of RTX. During the follow-up after the first cycle of RTX, ‘glucocorticoids’ was provided to three AAV patients, of whom 1 patient with serious infections received a dose of 62.5 mg/day equivalent to methylprednisolone, whereas, both two patients without serious infections took a dose of 62.5 mg/day equivalent to methylprednisolone. And there were no significant differences in the frequency and doses of ‘high-dose glucocorticoids’ between AAV patients with serious infections and those without (p=0.236 for the frequency).
Among the various risk factors for serious infections, we focused on four variables at the first cycle of RTX such as obesity, a smoking history and functional status in AAV patients. First, we investigated body mass index for obesity status and a smoking history at the time of the first cycle of RTX. The mean body mass index was 24.0 kg/m
2 and eight patients (22.2%) had smoking history (no current smoker), however, no statistically significant differences in those variables between the two groups were observed (
Table 1). Whereas, in terms of functional status, all AAV patients were discharged and none of them was transferred to other hospitals after the first cycle of RTX. Therefore, although we could not obtain clear information on functional status from the medical records, it is assumed that most patients did not have seriously reduced functional states and thus functional status was not likely to contribute to the development of the serious infection in AAV patients.
The five cases of serious infections comprised three cases of pneumonia, one case of enterocolitis, and one case of cellulitis. There were no cases of bacterial pneumonia was not included, but there were cases of viral, fungal, and atypical pneumonia. Of these three patients, two patients died, one from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (fungal infection) and the other from pneumonia due to cytomegalovirus infection. We believe that these results have two clinical implications. First, in terms of serious infections associated with AAV, all serious infections that caused death were infections that invaded the lungs. Therefore, it could be inferred that although pulmonary manifestation was not directly associated with serious infections, pulmonary involvement in AAV may increase the likelihood of infectious lung disease and ultimately increase the frequency of death. In terms of serious infections not associated with AAV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) at the time of first RTX infusion tended to be associated with serious infections, although there was no statistical significance in the univariable Cox hazards model analysis (HR=7.997; 95% CI: 0.725, 88.203; p=0.090) (
Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, it could be inferred that the presence or absence of COPD may also serve as a predictor for monitoring the occurrence of serious infections but was not useful in this study.
The advantage of this study is that we investigated and proved the clinical significance of serious infections after the first RTX infusion in Korean patients with AAV for the first time, although we could not identify predictors for the occurrence of serious infections in patients with AAV receiving RTX. However, this study had several limitations such as the small number of AAV patients and the retrospective design of this study. In particular, serum immunoglobulin levels should have been checked at baseline and monitored after RTX treatment because hypogammaglobinaemia following RTX may increase infectious risk [
12-
14]. However, due to the retrospective design of this study, we could not provide immunoglobulin levels before and after RTX treatment in AAV patients [
15]. We realized that vaccinations may be associated with the risk of serious infections, but we could not obtain information on the performance of vaccination generally recommended, because it is almost impossible in Korea's medical reality to collect information on vaccinations other than information provided by patients. Also, since two of three AAV patients with serious infection passed away during the first 6 months after the first cycle of RTX, we could not clarify the association between therapeutic responses to RTX and serious infections in this study. We believe that future prospective studies with a larger number of patients who receive more than the second cycle of RTX infusion will clarify and validate the results of our study.
In conclusion, serious infection is an important predictor of all-cause mortality in Korean patients with AAV who received their first RTX infusion but there were no significant variables to predict the occurrence of serious infections at the time of initiating RTX. Therefore, if the necessity for RTX infusion is increased in patients with AAV that is refractory to other induction therapeutic regimens and which should be controlled, physicians should begin RTX infusion beyond concerns about the occurrence of serious infection which might provoke all-cause mortality.