Journal List > Korean J Sports Med > v.40(4) > 1516080339

The Association between Weekend Warrior Physical Activity Patterns and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Korean Adults

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies that have evaluated the relationships between physical activity (PA) patterns of weekend warriors (i.e., individuals who perform all their weekly exercises in one or two sessions) and health outcomes have reported inconsistent findings. The present study sought to examine the association between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in Korean adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 29,543 men and women who participated in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2014 and 2019. The weekend warrior PA was defined as at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity or at least 75 minutes/week of vigorous-intensity PA concentrated in one or two sessions/week.

Results

Compared with the inactive PA patterns, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) between the weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors were 0.89 (0.69–1.15) for hypertension, 0.81 (0.55–1.17) for diabetes, 0.92 (0.69–1.22) for dyslipidemia, 1.10 (0.91–1.34) for obesity, and 1.0 (0.83–1.27) for metabolic syndrome. Regularly active PA patterns, however, had lower odds of diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that no evidence of significant associations between the weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in a representative Korean population. Large-scale prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

Introduction

The prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases, such as hypertension1, diabetes2, obesity3, metabolic syndrome3, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)4 has continued to increase due to aging and the rapid and increasing use of modern technology, changing patterns of commuting, and urbanization in the last several decades, which has contributed to increased levels of physical inactivity globally. The relationships of physical inactivity with hypertension5, diabetes6, dyslipidemia7, obesity8, metabolic syndrome9, and CVD10 are well established.
Higher levels of physical activity (PA) have a significant beneficial impact on health11 and positively modulate several cardiometabolic risk factors12. The PA guidelines of World Health Organization (WHO) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommend at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity aerobic PA or 75 minutes/week of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorous-intensity PA13-15. However, a fourth of adults do not currently meet global PA recommendations16. There are many reasons people cannot comply with the guidelines for PA, and this includes lack of time17. The reasons for the lack of time include the variety of jobs due to changes in the social environment, the diversity of work patterns, urbanization, the increased distance and time between workplace and home, and the heavy burden of work.
In accordance with compliance with the PA guidelines, the leisure time PA (LTPA) profile can be categorized into four groups18, which are inactive, insufficiently active, “weekend warrior,” and regularly active. When the recommended amount of PA pertaining to the guidelines is met but achieved in one or two sessions a week, it is called a weekend warrior PA18. In 2004, Lee et al.18 first reported the health benefits of the weekend warrior PA patterns.
Previous studies evaluating the relationships between weekend warrior PA patterns and health outcomes are sparse and the results have not been consistent. A number of studies have shown a beneficial effect of weekend warrior PA patterns on the risk of all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, cancer mortality, and cardio-metabolic risk factors19-22.
However, other studies have not confirmed these results23,24. Therefore, from a global perspective, further studies are needed to confirm or refute whether weekend warrior PA patterns have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, there is no previous report on the association between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in a Korean population. We hypothesized that weekend warrior PA patterns will be associated with decreased adverse cardiometabolic risk factors in the Korean general population. The aim of this study was to determine the associations of weekend warrior PA patterns with several cardiometabolic risk factors in a Korean population.

Methods

1. Participants

This study was conducted using data collected through the Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey from 2014 to 2019. In the Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency of the Ministry of Health and Welfare conducted health, nutrition, and screening surveys by extracting representative samples of residents over 1 year of age residing in Korea every year (http://knhanes.kdca.go.kr). Data were collected using health questionnaires administered during interviews, physical measurements, and clinical tests. From 2014 to 2019, 47,309 people participated in this survey, of whom 37,916 were over 19 years of age. We analyzed data for 29,543 individuals (median age, 46 years; range, 19–80 years), with exception of those with missing data on PA or cardiometabolic risk factors.
Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Seoul (No. 2021-05-002).

2. Physical activity questionnaire

The global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ), developed by the WHO in 200225, was used to assess PA in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey since 201426. It was translated into Korean, and its reliability and validity were verified27. In the GPAQ, the domains of PA were divided into LTPA, occupational PA (OPA), and transport PA. GPAQ is a standardized measurement tool that measures the amount of PA by domains and can compare the trends of PA within and between countries. In the present study, physical activity has been defined as sport, exercise, and LTPAs, excluding PA at work or when moving from one location to another28. Participants were asked about the types of activities, the number of days of activity per week, and the number of hours and minutes of activity per day26. Vigorous exercise was defined as high-intensity sport, athletics, and recreational activities in which the heart beats very fast or when one is out of breath for at least 10 minutes13,15 (e.g., running, jumping rope, mountain climbing, basketball, swimming, badminton singles, etc.). Moderate exercise was defined as a moderate-intensity sport or an exercise in which there is a slightly faster heartbeat or slight shortness of breath for at least 10 minutes13,15 (e.g., brisk walking, jogging, weight training, golf, dance sports, Pilates, etc). PA was classified into four groups according to the frequency, duration, and intensity of PA18. The four groups are as follows: (i) inactive, defined as not reporting any moderate-intensity or vigorous-intensity PA; (ii) insufficiently active, defined as reporting less than 150 minutes/week in moderate-intensity PA and less than 75 minutes/week in vigorous-intensity PA; (iii) weekend warrior, defined as at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity or at least 75 minutes/week of vigorous-intensity PA concentrated in one or two sessions/week; and (iv) regularly active, defined as reporting at least 150 minutes/week in moderate-intensity PA or at least 75 minutes/week in vigorous-intensity PA spread over 3 or more sessions during the week.

3. Cardiometabolic risk factors

Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medications. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose level of ≥126 mg/dL, taking oral hypoglycemic agents, using insulins, or being diagnosed by a physician. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol of ≥240 mg/dL or taking lipid lowering agents. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kg)/height2 (m2) and obesity was defined as a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2. Metabolic syndrome was defined based on the criteria of the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III, 2007) which included the presence of more than three of the following metabolic abnormalities: (1) elevated blood pressure of ≥130/85 mm Hg or on medication; (2) elevated fasting glucose of ≥100 mg/dL or on medication; (3) abdominal obesity (waist circumference of >90 cm for men and >85 cm for women in Korean); (4) elevated triglyceride of ≥150 mg/dL or on medication; (5) reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of <40 mg/dL for men and <50 mg/dL for women or on medication29.

4. Covariates

Marital status was classified as people living with their spouses and those living without their spouses, including single, divorced, and separated persons. The level of education was divided into middle school graduates or lower, high school graduates, and college graduates or higher. Household income was divided into quartiles according to monthly average household equalization income, and the quartiles were lower, lower-middle, upper-middle, and upper classes. The monthly average household equalization income was calculated as monthly household income square root of household numbers. Occupation was divided into professional and managerial, skilled nonmanual, skilled manual, routine and manual, and no occupation. Alcohol consumption was divided into drinking and nondrinking groups. Those who drank more than once a month in the past year were included in the drinking group, and those who drank less than one time or did not drink at all were included in the nondrinking group. Smoking status was categorized as smoking and nonsmoking groups. The smoking group included those who smoked more than five packs (100 cigarettes) of cigarettes throughout their lives, as well as smoke currently, while the nonsmoking group included those who smoked less than five packs throughout their lives or never smoked.

5. Statistical analysis

To compare the general characteristics of participants by PA patterns, we used the complex sample chi-square test for categorical variables and the complex sample generalized linear model for continuous variables. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression analyses with adjustment for confounding factors (age, age group, gender, marital status, education level, household income, occupation, smoking status, and alcohol consumption) to determine the associations between PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 and analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Of 29,545 analyzed participants, 21,514 (68.9%) were classified as inactive; 3,470 (13.0%) as insufficiently active; 638 (2.8%) as weekend warriors; and 3,921 (15.3%) as regularly active. The weekend warriors were younger than the other PA pattern groups with a mean age of 40.6 years and had more men than women (76.9%). All four groups of PA patterns had mean BMIs in the overweight range. (Table 1). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in the weekend warrior PA patterns was lower than in the other groups (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1). Compared with an inactive PA reference group, there were associations of weekend warrior PA with hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome in the crude model, but the associations were attenuated to null after adjustment for age and gender, and subsequent adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables (Table 2). Those who were regularly active had lower odds of diabetes and metabolic syndrome in multivariable analysis (Table 2). In the subgroup analysis by gender, there were no associations between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in men and women (Table 3). The association between regularly active PA pattern and metabolic syndrome persisted in subgroups of men and women (Table 3).

Discussion

In this general population-based sample of Korean men and women, regularly active PA patterns were associated with lower risk of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. However, we did not find any significant associations between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors. Though several previous studies have demonstrated that PA was associated with beneficial health outcomes when the recommended amounts of PA are met, findings on the effects of weekend warrior PA have mostly been inconsistent.
A previous study showed that weekend warriors who were active only at a moderate intensity were more likely to have low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness than men who exercised more frequently but at the same intensity23. Another study showed that moderate-intensity activity only at weekends did not improve cardiovascular risk factors in elderly persons with a relatively normal cardiovascular risk profile. However, in elderly persons having hypertension, there might be some beneficial effects from such an activity24. In addition, Lee et al.18 reported that the decrease in the mortality rate of weekend warriors was not significant compared to sedentary activity (relative risk [RR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.65–1.11); in their subanalysis, weekend warriors showed a 59% decrease in the risk of mortality (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21–0.81) in the low-risk group, but not in the high-risk group with either smoking, obesity, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75–1.38). Our results are consistent with these previous studies that reported no evidence of significant associations between the weekend warrior PA patterns and health outcomes and add to the accumulating literature on these relationships in a Korean population.
In contrast to the results of studies demonstrating that weekend warrior PA patterns were not associated with reduced risk of mortality and adverse cardiometabolic risk factors, a few studies have demonstrated that a favorable effect of weekend warrior PA patterns on all-cause and CVD mortality and cardiometabolic risk factors. In a pooled analysis of 11 population-based cohorts, using a large sample of British adults, O’Donovan et al.19 reported that weekend warriors had a reduced risk of all-cause mortality by 30%, cerebrovascular disease mortality by 40%, and cancer mortality by 18%. Furthermore, Shiroma et al.21 objectively assessed accumulated patterns of PA recorded while wearing an accelerometer. They reported a 69% reduction in mortality rate in weekend warriors versus inactive participants after adjustment for socioeconomic covariates. In addition, another study based on Chinese rural adults showed that the decreased odds of hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome in male weekend warriors were 21%, 48%, and 42%, respectively, and in female weekend warriors were 29%, 48%, and 33% respectively20, compared with inactive participants. In another study that evaluated associations between PA patterns and cardiovascular risk factors in Swiss middle-aged adults, Gubelmann et al.22 reported associations of lower prevalence of hypertension and obesity in weekend warriors following adjustment for socioeconomic variables.
The reasons for these conflicting results are not fully understood, but differences in study design, or racial or outcomes differences between previous studies and the present study could, in part, explain these conflicting results. In the present study, we used a cross-sectional design and our population was based on Asian adults. Future studies are needed to confirm these results in participants with different racial or ethnic origins and to clarify the prospective associations of weekend warrior PA patterns and a variety of health outcomes.
In addition, the differences in PA questionnaires between previous studies and the present study could also explain these conflicting results. In the PA questionnaires used in the study by O’Donovan et al.19, PA had three domains that were housework, walking, and sports. There was no distinction between PA domains by LTPA in the analysis of weekend warrior PA patterns. In the questionnaires used in the study by Xiao et al.20, the questionnaire was IPAQ that PA had two domains which were OPA and LTPA. However, there was no distinction between PA domains by LTPA in the analysis of weekend warrior PA patterns. They reported less than 30% of weekend warriors were only engaged in LTPA. PA questionnaires in these previous studies were not distinct by domains of LTPA and OPA. In the present study, we only used LTPA, with OPA excluded from the GPAG. It is of interest to note that the recent evidence of Holtermann et al.30 suggests a contrast between the health effects of LTPA and OPA. According to Wanner et al.31, LTPA was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular health, whereas OPA was associated with adverse cardiovascular health. Thus, such differences in the evaluation of PA may provide insight into these conflicting results. Future studies are needed to clarify the associations between weekend warrior LTPA patterns and a variety of health outcomes using the same PA questionnaires.
The present study has several methodological limitations which should be acknowledged. Because this study was based on a cross-sectional design, the temporal relationship between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors cannot be determined. The relatively small sample size of participants with weekend warrior PA patterns is also a limitation. Since the information on PA was obtained from a self-reported questionnaire, there could be misclassification in terms of duration, frequency, and intensity of LTPA. Other confounding factors such as diet, living place, and the presence of musculoskeletal diseases were not considered. In spite of these limitations, this study has several strengths. This is the first study to evaluate the associations between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in a Korean population. The sample was large and utilized a nationwide cohort using an appropriate sampling process and is representative of the general population.
In conclusion, though regularly active PA patterns were associated with lower odds of diabetes and metabolic syndrome, there was no evidence of significant associations between weekend warrior PA patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors in a representative Korean population. Large-scale prospective cohort studies are warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://doi.org/10.5763/kjsm.2022.40.4.234 .

Notes

Conflict of Interest

Sae Young Jae is the editor-in-chief of The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. He was not involved in the review process of this study. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Visualization: CG, SYJ. Data curation, Formal analysis: CG. Methodology: all authors. Writing–original draft: CG, SYJ. Writing–review & editing: all authors.

REFERENCES

1. Bloch MJ. 2016; Worldwide prevalence of hypertension exceeds 1.3 billion. J Am Soc Hypertens. 10:753–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.08.006. PMID: 27660007.
crossref
2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. 2004; Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 27:1047–53. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047. PMID: 15111519.
crossref
3. Engin A. 2017; The definition and prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 960:1–17. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_1. PMID: 28585193.
crossref
4. Laslett LJ, Alagona P, Clark BA, et al. 2012; The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 60(25 Suppl):S1–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.002. PMID: 23257320.
5. Diaz KM, Shimbo D. 2013; Physical activity and the prevention of hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 15:659–68. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-013-0386-8. PMID: 24052212. PMCID: PMC3901083.
crossref
6. LaMonte MJ, Blair SN, Church TS. 2005; Physical activity and diabetes prevention. J Appl Physiol (1985). 99:1205–13. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00193.2005. PMID: 16103523.
crossref
7. LeBlanc AG, Janssen I. 2010; Dose-response relationship between physical activity and dyslipidemia in youth. Can J Cardiol. 26:201–5. DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(10)70400-1. PMID: 20548982.
crossref
8. Fox KR, Hillsdon M. 2007; Physical activity and obesity. Obes Rev. 8 Suppl 1:115–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00329.x. PMID: 17316313.
crossref
9. Yao C, Zuo H, Kong L, Yang X, Zhai F. Technical Working Group of China National Nutrition and Health Survey. 2006; Relationship between physical activity and metabolic syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 86:2099–104.
10. Conti AA, Macchi C, Molino Lova R, Conti A, Gensini GF. 2007; Relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular disease. Selected historical highlights. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 47:84–90.
11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion;1996.
12. Cleven L, Krell-Roesch J, Nigg CR, Woll A. 2020; The association between physical activity with incident obesity, coronary heart disease, diabetes and hypertension in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies published after 2012. BMC Public Health. 20:726. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08715-4. PMID: 32429951. PMCID: PMC7238737.
crossref
13. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. 2020; World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 54:1451–62. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. PMID: 33239350. PMCID: PMC7719906.
crossref
14. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). 2013. Physical activity guide for Koreans. MOHW;Sejong:
15. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. 2018; The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 320:2020–8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854. PMID: 30418471. PMCID: PMC9582631.
crossref
16. Hei Y, Yoon J, Sung H, Lim J, Kim YS. 2022; Current status of physical activity according to the socioeconomic status of Korean adults: based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2014‒2018. Korean J Sports Med. 40:22–9. DOI: 10.5763/kjsm.2022.40.1.22.
crossref
17. Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W. Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34:1996–2001. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00020. PMID: 12471307.
crossref
18. Lee IM, Sesso HD, Oguma Y, Paffenbarger RS. 2004; The "weekend warrior" and risk of mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 160:636–41. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh274. PMID: 15383407.
crossref
19. O'Donovan G, Lee IM, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. 2017; Association of "Weekend Warrior" and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 177:335–42. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8014. PMID: 28097313.
20. Xiao J, Chu M, Shen H, et al. 2018; Relationship of "weekend warrior" and regular physical activity patterns with metabolic syndrome and its associated diseases among Chinese rural adults. J Sports Sci. 36:1963–71. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1428883. PMID: 29345215.
crossref
21. Shiroma EJ, Lee IM, Schepps MA, Kamada M, Harris TB. 2019; Physical activity patterns and mortality: the weekend warrior and activity bouts. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 51:35–40. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001762. PMID: 30138219. PMCID: PMC6295264.
crossref
22. Gubelmann C, Antiochos P, Vollenweider P, Marques-Vidal P. 2018; Association of activity behaviours and patterns with cardiovascular risk factors in Swiss middle-aged adults: the CoLaus study. Prev Med Rep. 11:31–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.012. PMID: 29984135. PMCID: PMC6030388.
crossref
23. Kohl HW, FitzGerald SJ, Willis BL, Barlow CE, Haskell WL. 2009; Weekend warriors and cardiorespiratory fitness: is it frequency or intensity? Med Sci Sport Exerc. 41:146. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000354089.72043.7e.
crossref
24. Gatterer H, Raab C, Pramsohler S, Faulhaber M, Burtscher M, Netzer N. 2015; Effect of weekly hiking on cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 48:150–3. DOI: 10.1007/s00391-014-0622-0. PMID: 24609428.
crossref
25. Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health Cluster, World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. WHO STEPS surveillance manual: the WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance [Internet]. WHO;Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43376. cited 2021 Jul 26. Geneva:
26. Min K, Oh YH, Kim SW, Kim HJ, Lee H, Lee SH, et al. 2020; Physical activity patterns and their associated factors measured by Global Physical Activity Questionnaire Survey among Korean. Korean J Sports Med. 38:1–11. DOI: 10.5763/kjsm.2020.38.1.1.
crossref
27. Lee J, Lee C, Min J, et al. 2020; Development of the Korean global physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity study. Glob Health Promot. 27:44–55. DOI: 10.1177/1757975919854301. PMID: 31375056.
crossref
28. Armstrong T, Bull F. 2006; Development of the world Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. 14:66–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x.
crossref
29. Huang PL. 2009; A comprehensive definition for metabolic syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2:231–7. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.001180. PMID: 19407331. PMCID: PMC2675814.
crossref
30. Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, Straker L. 2018; The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med. 52:149–50. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965. PMID: 28798040.
crossref
31. Wanner M, Lohse T, Braun J, et al. 2019; Occupational physical activity and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: results from two longitudinal studies in Switzerland. Am J Ind Med. 62:559–67. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22975. PMID: 31111529.
crossref

Table 1
General characteristics of the study population by physical activity patterns
Characteristic Physical activity pattern
Inactive Insufficiently active Weekend warrior Regularly active p-value
No. of patients 21,514 (68.9) 3,470 (13.0) 638 (2.8) 3,921 (15.3)
Age (yr) 49.0±0.2 43.4±0.3 40.6±0.6 42.5±0.3
Male sex, n=12,290 (41.6) 8,170 (44.7) 1,648 (55.6) 443 (76.9) 2,029 (60.2) <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.8±0.0 23.8±0.1 24.2±0.2 24.0±0.1
Marital status 0.003
Living with spouse 14,925 (66.6) 2,511 (67.3) 450 (64.7) 2,748 (63.1)
Living without spouse 6,584 (33.4) 959 (32.7) 188 (35.3) 1,172 (36.9)
Education level <0.001
Middle school or less 8,418 (29.3) 505 (10.2) 73 (8.5) 562 (9.4)
High school 6,656 (35.3) 1,105 (33.1) 235 (39.2) 1,440 (33.1)
College or over 6,384 (35.4) 1,860 (56.7) 330 (52.3) 1,913 (51.5)
Household income <0.001
Lower 5,091 (18.5) 307 (6.9) 33 (4.4) 390 (8.3)
Lower middle 5,727 (26.0) 693 (18.9) 116 (17.7) 771 (19.0)
Upper middle 5,523 (28.4) 1,076 (31.5) 199 (33.2) 1,132 (29.6)
High 5,112 (27.1) 1,384 (42.7) 289 (44.7) 1,621 (43.1)
Smoking status 0.011
Current 3,540 (20.8) 542 (19.4) 136 (24.6) 601 (18.8)
Never or ex-smoker 17,824 (79.2) 2,920 (80.6) 502 (75.4) 3,312 (81.2)
Alcohol consumption <0.001
Yes 10,378 (54.1) 2,099 (64.7) 460 (73.0) 2,454 (66.8)
No 11,005 (45.9) 1,363 (35.3) 178 (27.0) 1,459 (33.2)
Occupation <0.001
Professional and managerial 4,248 (23.9) 1,262 (40.2) 238 (39.1) 1,173 (33.3)
Skilled nonmanual 2,607 (13.3) 416 (12.6) 88 (14.6) 502 (13.8)
Skilled manual 3,201 (15.2) 417 (12.4) 112 (15.9) 400 (10.2)
Routine and manual 2,208 (9.4) 185 (4.7) 33 (4.3) 222 (4.9)
Inoccupation 9,182 (38.2) 1,184 (30.1) 164 (26.1) 1,605 (37.8)
Cardiometabolic risk factors
Hypertension 7,699 (29.5) 835 (21.2) 129 (18.2) 936 (20.1) <0.001
Diabetes 2,299 (11.2) 223 (6.8) 39 (5.8) 244 (6.5) <0.001
Dyslipidemia 4,669 (20.3) 623 (16.4) 91 (13.4) 709 (16.2) <0.001
Obesity 7,337 (34.0) 1,107 (31.9) 230 (37.7) 1,317 (35.6) 0.043
Metabolic syndrome 6,056 (29.5) 769 (22.5) 161 (24.8) 790 (19.5) <0.001

Values are presented as frequency (%) or mean±standard error.

Table 2
Association between weekend warrior physical activity pattern and cardiometabolic risk factors
Physical activity pattern Cardiometabolic risk factors, OR (95% CI)
Hypertension Diabetes Dyslipidemia Obesity Metabolic syndrome
Subjects, n (%) 9,599 (32.6) 2,805 (12.3) 6,092 (22.0) 9,991 (33.9) 7,776 (30.0)
Model 1
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.64 (0.58−0.71) 0.58 (0.49−0.69) 0.77 (0.69−0.85) 0.91 (0.84−0.99) 0.47 (0.41−0.55)
Weekend warrior 0.53 (0.42−0.67) 0.49 (0.34−0.70) 0.61 (0.46−0.80) 1.18 (0.97−1.42) 0.51 (0.33−0.79)
Regularly active 0.60 (0.54−0.66) 0.55 (0.47−0.64) 0.76 (0.68−0.84) 1.03 (0.94−1.12) 0.43 (0.37−0.50)
Model 2
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.91 (0.82−1.02) 0.80 (0.67−0.96) 1.03 (0.92−1.15) 0.89 (0.82−0.97) 0.81 (0.73−0.91)
Weekend warrior 0.83 (0.54−1.08) 0.73 (0.50−1.06) 0.94 (0.71−1.25) 1.04 (0.86−1.26) 0.96 (0.77−1.18)
Regularly active 0.85 (0.76−0.95) 0.75 (0.63−0.88) 1.04 (0.93−1.16) 0.99 (0.91−1.08) 0.68 (0.61−0.76)
Model 3
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.97 (0.87−1.09) 0.88 (0.73−1.05) 1.01 (0.90−1.13) 0.95 (0.87−1.04) 0.87 (0.78−0.97)
Weekend warrior 0.89 (0.69−1.15) 0.81 (0.55−1.17) 0.92 (0.69−1.22) 1.10 (0.91−1.34) 1.05 (0.83−1.27)
Regularly active 0.90 (0.81−1.01) 0.83 (0.70−0.98) 1.03 (0.92−1.15) 1.06 (0.97−1.16) 0.74 (0.66−0.82)

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Model 1: non-adjusted, model 2: adjusted for age and gender, model 3: adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education level, household income, occupation, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

Table 3
Association between weekend warrior physical activity pattern and cardiometabolic risk factors by gender
Physical activity pattern Cardiometabolic risk factors, OR (95% CI)
Hypertension (n=9,599) Diabetes (n=2,805) Dyslipidemia (n=6,092) Obesity (n=9,991) Metabolic syndrome (n=7,776)
Men, n (%) 4,404 (45.9) 1,415 (50.4) 2,219 (36.4) 4,851 (38.6) 3,653 (47.0)
Model 1
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.96 (0.83−1.10) 0.91 (0.72−1.15) 1.11 (0.95−1.30) 0.98 (0.87−1.10) 0.92 (0.80−1.06)
Weekend warrior 0.81 (0.61−1.08) 0.79 (0.52−1.20) 0.96 (0.69−1.33) 1.08 (0.86−1.35) 0.96 (0.75−1.21)
Regularly active 0.87 (0.76−0.99) 0.75 (0.61−0.93) 1.09 (0.93−1.27) 1.07 (0.95−1.20) 0.72 (0.63−0.83)
Model 2
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.96 (0.82−1.11) 0.99 (0.77−1.26) 1.02 (0.87−1.20) 0.95 (0.84−1.07) 0.90 (0.78−1.03)
Weekend warrior 0.82 (0.61−1.09) 0.86 (0.57−1.31) 0.87 (0.62−1.21) 1.04 (0.83−1.34) 0.95 (0.75−1.20)
Regularly active 0.87 (0.76−0.99) 0.83 (0.67−1.03) 1.05 (0.89−1.22) 1.08 (0.96−1.21) 0.73 (0.64−0.84)
Women, n (%) 5,195 (54.1) 1,390 (49.6) 3,873 (63.6) 5,140 (51.4) 4,123 (53.0)
Model 1
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.86 (0.73−1.01) 0.62 (0.47−0.81) 0.94 (0.81−1.10) 0.79 (0.70−0.90) 0.66 (0.56−0.77)
Weekend warrior 0.74 (0.44−1.25) 0.46 (0.17−1.24) 0.75 (0.45−1.25) 0.76 (0.51−1.13) 0.79 (0.48−1.30)
Regularly active 0.84 (0.71−0.98) 0.76 (0.57−1.00) 0.97 (0.84−1.25) 0.84 (0.73−0.96) 0.61 (0.52−0.72)
Model 2
Inactive 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Insufficiently active 0.95 (0.81−1.13) 0.67 (0.50−0.89) 0.93 (0.79−1.09) 0.91 (0.79−1.04) 0.74 (0.63−0.87)
Weekend warrior 0.85 (0.51−1.43) 0.52 (0.20−1.39) 0.77 (0.46−1.29) 0.89 (0.60−1.34) 0.95 (0.58−1.57)
Regularly active 0.92 (0.78−1.08) 0.83 (0.62−1.11) 0.95 (0.81−1.10) 0.95 (0.83−1.09) 0.68 (0.58−0.80)

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Model 1: adjusted for age, model 2: adjusted for age, education, marital status, household income, occupation, smoking status, and alcohol use.

TOOLS
Similar articles