PDF
Citation
Print
INTRODUCTION
Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is characterized by fibrosis, calcification and OLF, causing thoracic myelopathy [2,8,10]. Surgical decompression with or without fixation is recommended when thoracic myelopathy is symptomatic [20]. However, the need for instrumentation in thoracic OLF surgery is uncertain even though instrumented fusion surgery for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) is the standard treatment [24]. The symptoms of thoracic myelopathy usually improve after surgery, and the recurrence of OLF is rarely reported [3,14,30,44].
The causes of recurrence are not clear, but repeated mechanical stress on the residual ligamentum flavum after decompression-only surgery might be involved [12,18,36,40]. Because of this possibility, instrumented fusion has been advocated with decompression surgery [3,13,14,20,27,29,35,38,44]. Moreover, instrumented fusion may influence the local, regional and global sagittal spinal alignment, but studies analyzing post-surgical radiological changes are limited [1].
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of decompression only surgery with outcomes of decompression plus instrumented fusion for thoracic OLF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient populations
After approval from the Institutional Review Board at the Seoul National University Hospital (No. 1805-022-944) was obtained, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone surgery for thoracic myelopathy from January 2009 to December 2016.
Inclusion criteria were as follows : 1) patients who had undergone surgery for thoracic OLF, 2) patients who had followed up more than 24 months, 3) patients with preoperative, 12-month, and 24-month postoperative whole spine X-rays, and 4) patients with preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) scan.
Exclusion criteria were as follows : 1) patients with a history of previous thoracic spinal surgery, 2) patients with combined herniated disc disease or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments at the thoracic spine, 3) patients with myelopathic symptoms due to cervical lesions, and 4) patients who had undergone surgery with OLF in upper and mid-thoracic level (T2-8).
Finally, 28 patients were included in this study. Enrolled cases were divided into two groups; 17 patients with decompression only (D-group) and 11 patients with decompression plus instrumented fusion (F-group).
Surgical procedure and postoperative management
All operations were performed by experienced surgeons (CCK, JTA, and KCH) who had each performed more than 300 spinal surgeries.
Before 2013, decompression-only surgery was performed (D-group). The OLF and residual ligamentum flavum were removed after laminotomy, and the laminoplasty was performed with translaminar screws after decompression [31,41]. From 2013, instrumented fusions were routinely performed after decompression and removal of OLF (F-group). In the F-group, more than half of the facets were sufficiently removed to allow removal of the lateral parts of the OLF (Fig. 1), and instrumentations were performed only on the level of the OLF presence.
All patients were encouraged to ambulate from the day of surgery and were discharged 2–3 days after surgery. The patients were requested to wear a thoracic orthosis for a month in case of instrumented fusion.
Clinical evaluation
Mean age, sex proportion, body mass index (BMI), and the number of diabetic patients, symptom duration, follow-up duration, location of lesions were compared between two groups as preoperative characteristics. The mean follow-up period was 41.1±13.9 months (range, 25–74).
The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was modified to evaluate the neurological function [42] (11, normal; 7–10, mild dysfunction; 4–6 moderate dysfunction; 0–3 severe dysfunction) (Table 1). All patients were requested to fill out questionnaires to evaluate the Korean version of Oswestry disability index (K-ODI) and Visual analogue scale of the back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L) [15]. To compare the clinical outcomes of the D-group and the F-group, we used the preoperative clinical parameters and those at postoperative 1 and 2 years.
In addition, complications from surgery and recurrence of OLF in the two groups during the follow-up period were investigated.
Radiographic evaluation
Whole-spine radiographs were taken in patients using 36-inch-long digital lateral radiographic films, with the arms of the patient flexed to 60° and the hips and knees fully extended preoperative, 12 months postoperative, and yearly thereafter. Patients were asked to stand up and look straight ahead during the whole-spine radiography. The following parameters were measured from the whole-spine radiographs; sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), thoracic kyphosis angle (TKA; T4-T12), segmental kyphosis angle (SKA) at the operative segment, and lumbar lordosis angle (LLA; L1-S1, a negative value implying lordosis) (Fig. 2). Cobb’s method was used to measure angles with positive values, meaning kyphosis.
Preoperative radiological parameters were compared with those at postoperative 1 and 2 years. All parameters were measured three times each at 2-week intervals by one neurosurgeon (SHH) and once by another neurosurgeon (JHY) blinded to the information of the patients using the tools in the picture archiving and communication system (Marosis, version 5483; Infinitt Healthcare, Seoul, Korea), which ran in a Microsoft Windows environment (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). For all radiological parameters, the intra-rater correlation coefficient was greater than 0.87 and the inter-rater correlation coefficient was greater than 0.81, and therefore the mean values of the four measurements were used for the present study.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons between continuous values were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests (or t-tests), while comparisons between non-continuous values were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and chi-square tests (or Fisher’s exact tests). A linear mixed model was used to compare parameters of the D-group to those of the F-group at admission, postoperative 1 year, and postoperative 2 years. Fixed effects included sex, age, operative methods, and parameters measured over periods, especially in order to control for the differences in the period between the D-group and the F-group. The correlations between the parameters were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 21.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
RESULTS
The preoperative characteristics of enrolled patients, clinical, and radiographic parameters are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Mean age, sex proportion, BMI, and the number of diabetic patients were not different between the groups, nor were any of their clinical parameters. Asymptomatic combined diseases (lesions without spinal cord compression) at other spinal levels were observed in 27 patients (multiple OLF, 17; diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, 10; cervical OPLL, 6; ankylosing spondylitis, 1)
A gait disturbance with sensory change was the main presenting symptom in all patients (n=28). Other associated symptoms were back pain (n=23), leg pain (n=23), leg weakness (n=14), and voiding/defecation difficulty (n=12). After surgery, all clinical parameters were improved in both groups, and there was no difference in outcomes between groups, while the change in VAS-L was larger in F-group (Table 3). The radiological parameters were not different between the groups except for SVA (D-group, -1.1±3.9 mm vs. F-group, 3.5±5.4 mm; p=0.02).
Preoperative and postoperative 2-year SVA, pelvic parameters (PT, SS) and LLA were not significantly changed in either group. However, TKA and SKA were significantly changed after surgery in the D-group (p=0.02 and p=0.00, respectively), while they were not significantly changed in the F-group. The changes in TKA, SKA and LLA were significantly different between the groups. TKA, SKA, and LLA changed 6.8°±6.1°, 3.0°±2.8°, and 2.2°±5.3° after surgery in the D-group, while these changed 2.3°±4.7°, -0.1°±1.4°, and -1.3°±5.6° in the F-group (p=0.013, p<0.001, p=0.037, respectively) (Table 4). The change in SKA was correlated with that of TKA (r2=0.46, p=0.01), and the change in TKA was correlated with that of LLA (r2=0.33, p=0.01). Eventually, TKA was less kyphotic in the F-group than in the D-group (p=0.01), and LLA was more lordotic in the D-group than in the F-group after surgery (p=0.02) (Table 3).
According to the linear mixed model analysis, VAS-L, TKA, SKA, and LLA showed significant differences between the two procedures (p=0.008, p=0.013, p<0.0001, p=0.037, respectively) (Table 4 and Fig. 3), but there were no differences in these parameters between following times.
Surgical complications and OLF recurrence
In the D-group, there was one patient who has undergone duroplasty due to intraoperative dural tear, one patient with asymptomatic exacerbation of OLF in the adjacent region, and symptomatic recurrence of OLF occurred in one patient at postoperative 24 months (Fig. 4).
In the F-group, there was one patient who has undergone duroplasty due to intraoperative dural tear, one patient who has undergone revision due to CSF leakage after surgery. There was no revision surgery or failure due to instrumentation during the investigation period.
DISCUSSION
OLF was first reported in 1920 by Polgar [32] and the prevalence of incidental OLF on chest CT is reported to be around 20% [16]. OLF is not only an isolated form of spinal column ossification but it also occurs in association with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and metabolic diseases such as Paget disease, hypoparathyroidism, and X-linked hypophophatemia [20]. However, since not all OLF patients are symptomatic, surgery is performed only in 0.6/10000 population [2]. Several studies have described the pathophysiology in the development and progression of OLF, including mechanical/traumatic stress [9,12,36], metabolic cause [23,34], diabetes mellitus [20], degenerative change [25], genetic/hereditary factor [7,17,37,43] and environmental factor [26,28]. In addition to these hypotheses, increased tensile stress on the ligamentum flavum has appeared as a more plausible pathophysiology [11,22]. Patients with OLF have a more kyphotic thoracic angle than the normal population [16]. Increased kyphosis may lead to stretching and increased tensile stress on the ligamentum flavum, and thus, it has been suggested as one of causative factors for OLF [16].
Because of the progressive nature of myelopathy in OLF, surgical decompression is recommended for symptomatic OLF, and the symptoms are mostly reversible with appropriate decompression [2,8,13,27]. However, the extent of decompression is still controversial. Because OLF usually progresses from the lateral to the medial part of the ligamentum flavum [35], removal of OLF from the medial to lateral part with preservation of the facet joint may leave the lateral part of OLF. This remained OLF may grow due to micro-motion and tensile stress at the operated segment [2,35], and the recurrence of OLF has been reported after decompression-only surgery [3,6,14,30,44]. To date, there has been no reported case of recurrence at the surgical site after instrumented fusion. To achieve sufficient decompression and total removal of OLF, at least half of the facet joint needs to be resected during decompression [9,45]. However, one study reported the progression of thoracic kyphosis after the removal of the facet joints and OLF [1]. Instrumented fusion enables sufficient decompression and eliminates mechanical factor/tensile stress contributing to the progression of OLF [9,12,19,21,36,45]. In addition to these effects on the operated site, we hypothesized that instrumented fusion might influence local, regional, and global spinal alignment.
In this study, we compared surgical outcomes between patients with decompression only (D-group) and patients with decompression plus instrumented fusion (F-group). Clinical outcomes were improved in both groups, but the improvement of leg pain was better in F-group. The cause of the better VAS-L in the F-group than in the D-group was not clear. The different extent of decompression between the two groups and the consequent improvement of VAS-L may be a plausible explanation. Observation of the two groups’ postoperative MR images and CT scans revealed that more than half of the facets were sufficiently removed to allow for removal of the lateral parts of OLF in the F-group. On the other hand, in the D-groups, the lateral parts of OLF were not sufficiently removed, as fewer than half of facets were removed.
According to results by Wang et al. [39] showed the JOA score improvement rate of the F-group at the 1-year follow-up was significantly different from that of the D-group. This might be because the spinal activity of the F-group had little interference with postoperative spinal cord recovery. These results showed that decompression with instrumented fusion had a significant clinical effect, especially for patients with OLF who had an extensive laminectomy [39].
In radiological outcomes, our study showed that global spinal alignment, which was represented by SVA and pelvic parameters, was not significantly changed and that there was no difference between the groups. Furthermore, the linear mixed model analysis, with which we expected to mitigate the difference in the period between the D-group and the F-group, revealed that the difference between the two groups was due to the surgical method as we expected but not the period of surgery.
Although our study showed that the surgery improved clinical parameters regardless of the use of instrumented fusion, the symptomatic progression of residual OLF occurred after the decompression-only surgery. In addition to its possible recurrence at the operated segment, we need to consider the development/progression of OLF at other levels. The progression of kyphosis at the operated segment and thoracic spine was evident in cases without instrumented fusion. Because OLF was observed on multiple levels in more than 50% of thoracic OLF patients, less TKA may be advantageous in reducing the development and progression of OLF [16].
Additionally, according to a large meta-analysis by Prablek et al. [33], the incidence of pseudoarthrosis in thoracic fusion is approximately 1.8%. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the deterioration of OLF due to excessive stress on the upper and lower adjacent joints.
Recently, a multicenter study reported that the posterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation method for thoracic OLF was only performed in 9.4% of patients from 2000 to 2008, but then the proportion increased to 48.9% from 2014 to 2017 in Japan [4]. Actually, the reason for this change may be that the techniques and instrumentation of spinal surgery have advanced markedly over the past 15 years [5]. However, the increase in the portion of instrumentation also reflects the current surgical trend toward posterior instrumented fusion surgery in thoracic OLF [4].
Limitation
The present study had several limitations. First, the use of instrumented fusion was not randomized and the design of the present study meant there was a chance of selection bias, different rehabilitation procedures might have influenced the results. Moreover, the small number of patients might have led to low statistical power. Second, although we showed improved SKA and TKA with instrumented fusion, their clinical significance may only be evident with a long-term follow-up study. Nonetheless, we showed that local and regional spinal alignments were improved by instrumented fusion. Third, the D-group and the F-group had different operation time points. To control for this, a linear mixed model was used, but the characteristics of patients before and after 2013, differences in postoperative care before and after 2013, and so on were impossible to control.
Even if the difference in time were controlled, the effect of the era would be included, so there could be a difference in effects between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
In thoracic OLF, the postoperative clinical outcomes were favorable regardless of whether instrumented fusion was added. However, the progression of kyphosis at both the index level and thoracic spine occurred after decompression surgery without instrumented fusion. Considering the pathophysiology of OLF, after enabling sufficient decompression, instrumented fusion may be appropriate. A long-term follow-up study with a large number of patients is necessary to show the effectiveness of the instrumented fusion.
XML Download