Journal List > Endocrinol Metab > v.37(4) > 1516079243

TOOLS
Kim, Son, Kim, Kim, Seo, Jung, Park, Lim, and Kim: Association between the Blautia/Bacteroides Ratio and Altered Body Mass Index after Bariatric Surgery
Erratum: Correction of Figures
Miscellaneous

Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2022;37(4):701-702.

Published online: 21 July 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2022.401

Association between the Blautia/Bacteroides Ratio and Altered Body Mass Index after Bariatric Surgery

Yoonhong Kim1, *, Dooheon Son2, *, Bu Kyung Kim3, Ki Hyun Kim1, Kyung Won Seo1, Kyoungwon Jung3, Seun Ja Park3, Sanghyun Lim2, Jae Hyun Kim3

1Department of Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

2Cell Biotech Co. Ltd., Gimpo, Korea

3Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Corresponding authors: Jae Hyun Kim. Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, 262 Gamcheon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49267, Korea Tel: +82-51-990-5061, Fax: +82-51-990-5055, E-mail: kjh8517@daum.net

Sanghyun Lim. Cell Biotech Co. Ltd., 50 Aegibong-ro 409beon-gil, Wolgot-myeon, Gimpo 10003, Korea Tel: +82-31-987-6205, Fax: +82-31-987-6209, E-mail: shlim@cellbiotech.com

* These authors contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2022 Korean Endocrine Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Endocrinol Metab 2022;37:475-486
In the published article, Fig. 2C appeared incorrectly. The “r=0.65” should be changed to “r=–0.65.” And Fig. 5C also appeared incorrectly. The “r=0.59” should be changed to “r=–0.59.” In addition, Supplemental Fig. S1B and S1C appeared incorrectly. The “Before” and “After” should be switched.
The corrected figures are shown below.
We would like to apologize for any inconvenience or misunderstanding.

Fig. 2.
Prominent gut microbiota at the genus level before and after bariatric surgery and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size before and after bariatric surgery (threshold 2.4). (B) Correlation between Blautia and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides and BMI. (D) Correlation between the log value of Blautia/Bacteroides and BMI.
enm-2022-401f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Prominent gut microbiota between severe obese patients and healthy controls and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size between severely obese patients and healthy controls (left panel). Cladogram analysis between severely obese patients and healthy controls (right panel). (B) Correlation between Blautia and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides and BMI. (D) Correlation between the log value of Blautia/Bacteroides and BMI.
enm-2022-401f2.tif
Fig. 5.
Prominent gut microbiota at the species level before and after bariatric surgery and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size before and after bariatric surgery (threshold 3.6). (B) Correlation between Ruminococcus gnavus and Blautia obeum wexlerae and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides dorei vulgatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides nordii and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and BMI.
enm-2022-401f3.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles