Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusion
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Table 1
Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation. The sample serum-induced AhRL and MIS-ATP are presented as fold induction and % control (%) over those of the 10% CS-HS-treated control cells, respectively.
PIVUS, Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; AhRL, arylhydrocarbon receptor ligand activity; CS-HS, charcoal stripped human serum; MIS-ATP, mitochondrial inhibiting substance activity measured by intracellular ATP content.
Table 2
Quartile | AhRL | MIS-ATP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
Prevalence, % | OR (95% CI) | P value | Prevalence, % | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Q1 | 18.1 | Reference | - | 25.1 | Reference | - |
|
||||||
Q2 | 22.8 | 1.48 (0.86–2.55) | 0.160 | 23.7 | 0.98 (0.59–1.60) | 0.921 |
|
||||||
Q3 | 24.1 | 1.76 (1.03–3.01) | 0.158a | 25.0 | 1.15 (0.70–1.89) | 0.583 |
|
||||||
Q4 | 28.9 | 2.23 (1.33–3.74) | 0.003a | 20.2 | 0.71 (0.42–1.20) | 0.203 |
P values were calculated using multivariate logistic regression for quartile categories adjusted for sex, smoking, exercise habits, energy and alcohol intake, education level, body mass index, and fasting glucose.
Table 3
Variable | AhRLa | MIS-ATPa | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
Beta | SE | P value | Beta | SE | P value | |
Continuous variable | ||||||
Model 1 | 0.053 | 0.037 | 0.025b | 0.025 | 0.038 | 0.502 |
Model 2 | 0.092 | 0.039 | 0.020b | 0.022 | 0.040 | 0.594 |
|
||||||
Quartilec | ||||||
Model 1 | ||||||
Q1 | Reference | - | - | Reference | - | - |
Q2 | 0.024 | 0.105 | 0.819 | 0.014 | 0.105 | 0.897 |
Q3 | −0.046 | 0.105 | 0.662 | 0.076 | 0.105 | 0.471 |
Q4 | 0.243 | 0.105 | 0.021b | −0.003 | 0.105 | 0.972 |
Model 2 | ||||||
Q1 | Reference | - | - | Reference | - | - |
Q2 | −0.012 | 0.116 | 0.914 | 0.024 | 0.116 | 0.835 |
Q3 | 0.008 | 0.117 | 0.943 | 0.094 | 0.116 | 0.417 |
Q4 | 0.241 | 0.114 | 0.035b | −0.027 | 0.117 | 0.812 |
P values were calculated using linear regression for continuous variables and quartile categories. Model 1, adjusted for sex; Model 2, adjusted for Model 1+smoking, exercise habits, energy and alcohol intake, education level, body mass index, and fasting glucose.
Table 4
Component | AhRL (FI) | MIS-ATP (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
Mean±SD | P value | Mean±SD | P value | |
High glucose | ||||
Present (n=193) | 2.20±0.25 | 0.191 | 80.13±8.36 | 0.265 |
Absent (n=718) | 2.17±0.24 | 80.56±8.30 | ||
|
||||
Hypertension | ||||
Present (n=759) | 2.18±0.25 | 0.282 | 80.46±8.38 | 0.788 |
Absent (n=152) | 2.16±0.23 | 80.51±7.97 | ||
|
||||
High triglyceride | ||||
Present (n=162) | 2.20±0.26 | 0.219 | 80.51±8.63 | 0.844 |
Absent (n=749) | 2.17±0.24 | 80.46±8.24 | ||
|
||||
Low HDL | ||||
Present (n=163) | 2.21±0.25 | 0.019a | 80.98±7.51 | 0.238 |
Absent (n=748) | 2.17±0.24 | 80.36±8.47 | ||
|
||||
Large waist circumference | ||||
Present (n=311) | 2.18±0.25 | 0.479 | 80.48±8.17 | 0.344 |
Absent (n=600) | 2.17±0.24 | 80.46±8.39 |
The presence of each component of MetS was defined by following criteria; high glucose, glucose >6.2 mmol/L or antidiabetic treatment; hypertension, blood pressure >130/85 mm Hg or antihypertensive treatment; high triglyceride, triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L; low HDL, HDL <1.0 mmol/L in men and <1.3 mmol/L in women; large waist circumference, waist circumference >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women. Serum AhRL and MIS-ATP are presented as FI and % of charcoal stripped human serum-treated control. P values were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for sex, smoking, exercise habits, energy and alcohol intake, education level, body mass index, and fasting glucose.
Table 5
AhRLa | MIS-ATPa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
No./totalb | OR (95% CI) | P value | No./totalb | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Continuous variable | ||||||
Model 1 | 1.30 (1.03–1.62) | 0.022c | 0.86 (0.68–1.08) | 0.210 | ||
Model 2 | 1.43(1.13–1.81) | 0.003c | 0.82 (0.63–1.05) | 0.120 | ||
|
||||||
Quartilesd | ||||||
Model 1 | ||||||
Q1 | 15/180 | Reference | 19/191 | Reference | ||
Q2 | 16/181 | 1.21 (0.52–2.57) | 0.620 | 20/183 | 1.11 (0.57–2.17) | 0.740 |
Q3 | 18/190 | 1.25 (0.60–2.60) | 0.540 | 26/181 | 1.57 (0.83–2.96) | 0.160 |
Q4 | 28/191 | 2.02 (1.03–3.95) | 0.040c | 12/187 | 0.63 (0.29–1.38) | 0.230 |
Model 2 | ||||||
Q1 | 15/180 | Reference | 19/191 | Reference | ||
Q2 | 16/181 | 1.39 (0.58–3.31) | 0.450 | 20/183 | 0.81 (0.39–1.69) | 0.570 |
Q3 | 18/190 | 1.72 (0.75–3.94) | 0.200 | 26/181 | 1.38 (0.71–2.76) | 0.330 |
Q4 | 28/191 | 2.81 (1.31–6.02) | 0.008c | 12/187 | 0.45 (0.20–1.04) | 0.062 |
A worsening glucose tolerance was defined as either moving from the normal group to the impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or diabetes mellitus (DM) group, or from the IFG group to the DM group. Model 1, adjusted for sex; Model 2, adjusted for Model 1+smoking, exercise habits, energy and alcohol intake, education level, body mass index, and fasting glucose. P values were calculated using multivariate logistic regression for continuous variables and quartile categories.