Journal List > Blood Res > v.57(S1) > 1516078736

Samad, Mahboob, and Mansoor: Chronic myeloid leukemia: a type of MPN

Abstract

This review article classifies chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) based on cytogenetic analyses and different mutations detected in CML patients. The use of advanced technologies, such as karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization, has allowed us to study CML in detail and observe the different biochemical changes that occur in different CML types. This review also highlights the different types of receptor and signaling pathway mutations that occur in CML.

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines myeloproliferative disorders as a class of disorders in which the bone marrow (BM) produces an excess of red blood cells [polycythemia vera (PV)], platelets [essential thrombocytosis (ET)], or granulocytes [chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)]. In PV, there is an increase in the number of red blood cells and hemoglobin levels, which causes the blood to become more viscous, causing hypoxemia. ET is categorized by the multiplication of megakaryocytes, which are precursors to platelets. This leads to abnormal clotting and bleeding. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), another type of myeloproliferative disorder, is caused by the production of many new cells that ultimately scar the BM and disrupt healthy cell production.
CML, also known as chronic myelogenous leukemia, is an abnormality of the blood marrow typified by extensive growth of granulocytes without compromising their ability to become specialized cells. This results in an increase in the number of granulocytes and blast cells, which are precursors of granulocytes, in the blood smear. One-fifth of all leukemia cases in adults are caused by CML [1]. Reciprocal translocation t(9;22) (q34;q11.2) leads to 9q+ and a small 22q- being the distinguishable factor for CML. This chromosome is known as the Philadelphia chromosome, and leads to the formation of breakpoint cluster region (BCR)-tyrosine- protein kinase ABL1 fusion genes and proteins that are characteristically observed in patients with CML [2].
BCR-ABL fusion genes and proteins present in CML can be detected using fluorescent in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction, respectively. This helps in diagnosing CML in special cases (less than 10 percent), where the chromosome is difficult to locate owing to encrypted translocation [3].

CML PHILADELPHIA POSITIVE

In CML, the genetic translocation between ABL1 on the long arm of chromosome 9 and the BCR gene on the long arm of chromosome 22 is commonly observed, as shown by molecular studies. As a result, a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene is formed [4].
The position of the breaking point is highly irregular [5]; however, recombination usually follows a similar pattern. Two combinations are possible, as shown in Fig. 1A. The first is between intron 1 and intron 13/14 or exon 19 of BCR with ABL1 (140 kb region) and the second is when p210BCR-ABL1 is formed by fusion of BCR exon 13 and ABL1 exon 2 (e13a2) or e14a2. Both recombinations lead to the formation of a hybrid 210-kDa protein [6].
Fusion of the entire BCR and ABL1 gene results in the BCR-ABL1 transcript, p230BCR-ABL1 (e19a2). This transcript codes for a hybrid 230-kDa protein that is used in the diagnosis of neutrophilic-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-N) [7], as explained later in the article.

PHILADELPHIA NEGATIVE CML

Less than 1 in 10 patients with CML are Philadelphia negative [8]. The mean age group of Philadelphia negative patients is greater than 65 years, and patients present with common CML abnormalities such as monocytosis and thrombocytopenia. They have a shorter life span than Philadelphia positive patients because of a less effective response to chemotherapy [9, 10]. In Philadelphia negative CML there is a mutation in the JAK2 gene on chromosome 9p24 (V617F) instead of the BML/ABL gene. The JAK2 gene encodes for JAK2 kinase [11]. Many signaling pathways are activated through phosphorylation by non-receptor tyrosine kinases, such as Janus kinases. One such pathway is JAK/STAT, which is overly active in response to JAK2 gene mutations [12, 13]. In most cases of PV, there is a mutation in JAK2V617F gene, which is expected to be added to the WHO classification for the diagnosis of PV [14].

CHRONIC NEUTROPHILIC LEUKEMIA

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative disease that presents with an elevated neutrophil count in the blood or BM and an enlarged spleen [15]. The WHO classifies CNL according to the following characteristic features: sustained neutrophilia with minimal levels of circulating immature monocytes, basophils, and granulocytes in the peripheral blood or BM [16]. Along with a high percentage of neutrophils, CNL is also characterized by a defective Philadelphia chromosome that eventually translates into a novel BCR/ABL1 protein [7]. A BCR is located on chromosome 22 between exons 17 and 20, where a large fusion protein, p230, is also encoded [17].
Clinically, CNL is significantly more benign than CML. The total white blood cell (WBC) count was lower in CNL patients, anemia was milder, splenomegaly was less noticeable, and blastic transformation occurred considerably later [18].
CNL has been referred to as a version of “classical” CML linked to a defective Philadelphia chromosome. Translocation (9;22) in CNL causes the e19/a2 type BCR/ABL mRNA to be transcribed, which codes for a 230-kD BCR/ABL protein (p230). The e19/a2 BCR/ABL gene fusion anomaly on Philadelphia chromosome is a reliable diagnostic criterion for CNL. In contrast to classical CML, CNL’s significantly benign course stems from a distinct molecular lesion [19]. Recent developments in molecular genetics have revealed significant similarities between CNL and other chronic myeloid disorders such as atypical CML. These include epigenetic, spliceosome, and signaling mutations [20].

CHRONIC EOSINOPHILIC LEUKEMIA

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) is a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by sustained eosinophilia, organ involvement, increased blast cell count in the blood, and/or clonality, as demonstrated by cytogenetics and X-inactivation [21]. To the WHO classification system, CEL is characterized by the lack of a Philadelphia chromosome or PDGFRA/B and FGFR1 gene rearrangements and the ruling out of other acute or chronic primary marrow neoplasms linked to eosinophilia [22]. CEL is classified into two subtypes: CEL FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement positive, included in the WHO’s new subdivision, and CEL-NOS (not otherwise specified), which belongs to the WHO’s classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms [23]. A cryptic loss of 800 kb pairs on chromosome 4q12 causes FIP1L1 to fuse with the PDGFRA protein, resulting in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that promotes eosinophil growth, manifests as chronic eosinophilic leukemia in CEL FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement positive patients [24]. FIPL1-PDGFRA is a molecular indicator linked to a variant of hypereosinophilia, which is myeloproliferative in nature, that is, CEL [25, 26]. The characteristic findings in CEL-NOS include an absolute peripheral eosinophilia count >1.5×109 and a missing Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL fusion gene [23].
Several chromosomal abnormalities have validated the neoplastic nature of CEL, the most common of which are trisomy 15, trisomy 8, isochromosome 17, translocation t(2;5) (p23;q31), and translocation t(5;12) (q33;p13) [27-31].

CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA

In most patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) gene mutations found (Fig. 2) are due to the following reasons: involvement of genes regulating histone methylation like ASXL1 (40–50%); EZH2 (5–10%), genes causing methylation and hydroxymethylation like TET2 (50–60%); IDH1 (<5%), IDH2 (5–10%), and DNMT3A (<5%); RAS pathway genes like KRAS (10%), NRAS (10%), and CBL (5–10%); and splicing complex genes like SF3B1 (5–10%), ZRSF2 (5–10%), and U2AF1. CMML, a type of cancer with clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder. Patients with CMML present with sustained abnormal numbers of monocytes in the blood for more than 3 months (with a level above 950/µL equal to or greater than 10% monocytes) in addition to dysplastic features within the BM. CMML is usually defined as chronic leukemia with a persistent abnormal number of monocytes in the blood, and it has both proliferative and dysplastic features [32, 33]. Hence, a new category of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) has been established by the WHO so that CMML is not confused with other myeloproliferative disorders [34].
Furthermore, the WHO has subdivided CMML into CMML-1 and CMML-2 based on cell counts in BM biopsy and blood smears. CMLs with less than 5% blood cells in the blood and less than 10% in the BM cells are classified as CMML-1, and CMLs in which blast cells make up 5–20% of the WBC count and 10–20% of the BM cells are placed in the CMML-2 subcategory [35].
CMML is also associated with other mutations like JAK2 (5–10%), RUNX1 (10–15%), FLT3 (<5%), NPM1 (<5%), TP53 (1%) [36]. The exact genetic sequence leading to CMML is under investigation, but mutations in TET2 or ASXL1 have been seen in 40–60% of the patients. Furthermore, single-cell tracking experiments have shown that these mutations are the initial cellular changes that lead to CMML [37-39].

JUVENILE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a rare, deadly form of blood cancer that affects younger children, usually below the age of 3 years [40, 41]. JMML is a bridging disorder between MDS and MPN. Although it was earlier classified as an MDS by the French-American-British scheme, the presence of both dysplastic and proliferative features raised controversies with respect to its classification. Hence, it has now been placed in a new category of MDS/MPN by the WHO to recognize the overlap between the two disorders [42-44].
A major criterion for the diagnosis of JMML is the absence of the Philadelphia chromosome (BCR-ABL fusion gene). Chromosomal abnormalities like monosomy 7, deletion of 7q, are seen in 25–30% of the patients, but these chromosomal translocations are non-consistent [45].
Spontaneous proliferation of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) from myeloid progenitor cells in colony forming assays (CFU-GM) can be seen in some cases of JMML; however, it is now considered a non-consistent feature for diagnosis [46] and is also noted in children with viral infections [47].
In most cases of JMML, genetic mutations in RAS/MAPK pathway genes such as PTPN11, KRAS, NRAS, and NF-1 have been noted [48]. Less commonly occurring mutations that activate intracellular signaling pathways, including RAS and JAK/STAT signaling, have also been identified, such as RAC, RRAS, and JAK3. The co-occurrence of JMML with RAS pathway genes has only been observed in some cases [49-51]. The relationship between RAS pathway mutations and clinical symptoms in JMML patients is under investigation. Some studies have shown spontaneous disease regression with NRAS mutations [52, 53]. However, cases of JMML regeneration of JMML been recorded in patients with PTPN11 mutations [54].

CONCLUSION

According to WHO guidelines, the diagnosis of CML requires the results of morphological, immunophenotypic, and genetic testing with the examination of prior medical history and clinical details. Molecular testing is required to detect relevant chromosomal anomalies in CML. The presence of immature megakaryocytes is a hallmark of CML and is confirmed by BCR-ABL1 cytogenetic or molecular testing. The clinical findings in CML are insidious. The disorder is usually detected in the chronic phase when increased WBC counts are found in the blood or when splenomegaly is discovered on a general physical examination. Additionally, flow cytometry can be used to diagnose abnormal blasts and/or mature myeloid cells in the blood and BM. In a blast crisis, tracking lineage and atypical immunophenotypes can be useful. In addition, other subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms should be ruled out when making a diagnosis of CML. For example, ET presents with large and mature megakaryocytes on morphology, whereas PMF consists of abnormally maturing megakaryocytes with hyperchromatic and irregularly folded nuclei. Similarly, BM biopsy of PV displays hypercellularity, including marked proliferation of erythrocytes, granulocytes, and megakaryocytes. The diagnosis of PV is confirmed by the mutation of JAK2 V617F or JAK2 exon 12 [55].
Furthermore, recent developments in molecular genetics have shown the potential for further improvements in our understanding of CML and its treatment.

Notes

Authors’ Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

REFERENCES

1. Besa EC, Grethlein SJ. 2021. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML): practice essentials, background, pathophysiology. Medscape;New York, NY: at https://medicine.medscape.com/article/199425-overview. Accessed September 11, 2021.
2. Shtivelman E, Lifshitz B, Gale RP, Canaani E. 1985; Fused transcript of ABL and BCR genes in chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Nature. 315:550–4. DOI: 10.1038/315550a0. PMID: 2989692.
crossref
3. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. 2008. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th ed. IARC Press;Lyon, France: DOI: 10.1038/315550a0.
4. Hagemeijer A. 1987; Chromosome abnormalities in CML. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1:963–81. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3536(87)80034-3. PMID: 3332858.
crossref
5. Score J, Calasanz MJ, Ottman O, et al. 2010; Analysis of genomic breakpoints in p190 and p210 BCR-ABL indicate distinct mechanisms of formation. Leukemia. 24:1742–50. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.174. PMID: 20703256.
crossref
6. Kang ZJ, Liu YF, Xu LZ, et al. 2016; The Philadelphia chromosome in leukemogenesis. Chin J Cancer. 35:48. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0108-0. PMID: 27233483. PMCID: PMC4896164.
crossref
7. Pane F, Frigeri F, Sindona M, et al. 1996; Neutrophilic-chronic myeloid leukemia: a distinct disease with a specific molecular marker (BCR/ABL with C3/A2 junction). Blood. 88:2410–4. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V88.7.2410.bloodjournal8872410. PMID: 8839830.
8. Kantarjian HM, Smith TL, McCredie KB, et al. 1985; Chronic myelogenous leukemia: a multivariate analysis of the associations of patient characteristics and therapy with survival. Blood. 66:1326–35. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V66.6.1326.1326. PMID: 3864497.
crossref
9. Bartram CR, de Klein A, Hagemeijer A, et al. 1983; Translocation of c-ab1 oncogene correlates with the presence of a Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 306:77–80. DOI: 10.1038/306277a0. PMID: 6580527.
10. Kantarjian HM, Keating MJ, Walters RS, et al. 1986; Clinical and prognostic features of Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer. 58:2023–30. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861101)58:9<2023::AID-CNCR2820580912>3.0.CO;2-H. PMID: 3463397.
crossref
11. Haferlach T, Bacher U, Kern W, Schnittger S, Haferlach C. 2008; The diagnosis of BCR/ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPD): a comprehensive approach based on morphology, cytogenetics, and molecular markers. Ann Hematol. 87:1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-007-0403-6. PMID: 17938925. PMCID: PMC2082654.
crossref
12. Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. 2005; A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 352:1779–90. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051113. PMID: 15858187.
crossref
13. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Gilliland G. 2005; JAK2 mutations in myelo-proliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 353:1416–7. author reply 1416–7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc051878. PMID: 16192494.
14. Tefferi A, Thiele J, Orazi A, et al. 2007; Proposals and rationale for revision of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis: recommendations from an ad hoc international expert panel. Blood. 110:1092–7. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-083501. PMID: 17488875.
crossref
15. Böhm J, Kock S, Schaefer HE, Fisch P. 2003; Evidence of clonality in chronic neutrophilic leukaemia. J Clin Pathol. 56:292–5. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.4.292. PMID: 12663642. PMCID: PMC1769920.
crossref
16. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW. 2001. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. WHO classification of tumours. 3rd ed. IARC Press;Lyon, France: DOI: 10.3410/f.1087119.540101.
17. Saglio G, Guerrasio A, Rosso C, et al. 1990; New type of Bcr/Abl junction in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 76:1819–24. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V76.9.1819.1819. PMID: 2224129.
crossref
18. You W, Weisbrot IM. 1979; Chronic neutrophilic leukemia. Report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2:233–42. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/72.2.233. PMID: 289288.
crossref
19. Verstovsek S, Lin H, Kantarjian H, et al. 2002; Neutrophilic-chronic myeloid leukemia: low levels of p230 BCR/ABL mRNA and undetectable BCR/ABL protein may predict an indolent course. Cancer. 94:2416–25. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10490. PMID: 12015767.
20. Maxson JE, Tyner JW. 2017; Genomics of chronic neutrophilic leukemia. Blood. 129:715–22. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-695981. PMID: 28028025. PMCID: PMC5301820.
crossref
21. Vandenberghe P, Wlodarska I, Michaux L, et al. 2004; Clinical and molecular features of FIP1L1-PDFGRA (+) chronic eosinophilic leukemias. Leukemia. 18:734–42. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403313. PMID: 14973504.
crossref
22. Gotlib J. 2017; World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 92:1243–59. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24880. PMID: 29044676.
crossref
23. Bain BJ, Gilliland DG, Horny HP, Vardiman JW. 2008; Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al, eds.WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. WHO classification of tumours. 4th ed. Lyon, France:. IARC Press,. 51–3.
24. Murray NP. 2015; Chronic eosinophilic leukemia: a mini-review. J Hematol Blood Transfus Disord. 2:100004. DOI: 10.24966/HBTD-2999/100004.
25. Pardanani A, Brockman SR, Paternoster SF, et al. 2004; FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion: prevalence and clinicopathologic correlates in 89 consecutive patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia. Blood. 104:3038–45. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0787. PMID: 15284118.
crossref
26. Metzgeroth G, Erben P, Martin H, et al. 2012; Limited clinical activity of nilotinib and sorafenib in FIP1L1-PDGFRA positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia with imatinib-resistant T674I mutation. Leukemia. 26:162–4. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.181. PMID: 21818111.
crossref
27. Oliver JW, Deol I, Morgan DL, Tonk VS. 1998; Chronic eosinophilic leukemia and hypereosinophilic syndromes. Proposal for classification, literature review, and report of a case with a unique chromosomal abnormality. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 107:11–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4608(98)00099-5. PMID: 9844604.
28. Ma SK, Kwong YL, Shek TW, et al. 1999; The role of trisomy 8 in the pathogenesis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia. Hum Pathol. 30:864–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90149-1. PMID: 10414507.
crossref
29. Saitoh T, Saiki M, Inoue M, et al. 2002; CD25 positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia with myelofibrosis. Rinsho Ketsueki. 3:918–23. PMID: 12462027.
30. Lepretre S, Jardin F, Buchonnet G, et al. 2002; Eosinophilic leukemia associated with t(2;5)(p23;q31). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 33:164–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4608(01)00590-8. PMID: 11943346.
crossref
31. Granjo E, Lima M, Lopes JM, et al. 2002; Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia presenting with erythroderma, mild eosinophilia and hyper-IgE: clinical, immunological and cytogenetic features and therapeutic approach. A case report. Acta Haematol. 107:108–12. DOI: 10.1159/000046640. PMID: 11919392.
crossref
32. Patnaik MM, Padron E, LaBorde RR, et al. 2013; Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes. Leukemia. 27:1504–10. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.88. PMID: 23531518.
crossref
33. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. 2016; The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 127:2391–405. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. PMID: 27069254.
crossref
34. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, et al. 1999; World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol. 17:3835–49. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.12.3835. PMID: 10577857.
crossref
35. Vardiman JW, Pierre R, Bain B, et al. 2001; WHO histological classification of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon, France:. IARC Press,. 47–59.
36. Patnaik MM, Parikh SA, Hanson CA, Tefferi A. 2014; Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a concise clinical and patho-physiological review. Br J Haematol. 165:273–86. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12756. PMID: 24467717.
crossref
37. Jankowska AM, Makishima H, Tiu RV, et al. 2011; Mutational spectrum analysis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia includes genes associated with epigenetic regulation: UTX, EZH2, and DNMT3A. Blood. 118:3932–41. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-311019. PMID: 21828135. PMCID: PMC3193268.
crossref
38. Smith AE, Mohamedali AM, Kulasekararaj A, et al. 2010; Next- eneration sequencing of the TET2 gene in 355 MDS and CMML patients reveals low-abundance mutant clones with early origins, but indicates no definite prognostic value. Blood. 116:923–32. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274704. PMID: 20693430.
39. Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Renneville A, et al. 2013; Clonal architecture of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias. Blood. 121:2186–98. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-440347. PMID: 23319568.
crossref
40. Niemeyer CM, Arico M, Basso G, et al. 1997; Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases. European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Childhood (EWOG-MDS). Blood. 89:3534–43. PMID: 9160658.
41. Aricò M, Biondi A, Pui CH. 1997; Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 90:479–88. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V90.2.479. PMID: 9226148. PMCID: PMC9120833.
crossref
42. Orazi A, Germing U. 2008; The myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: myeloproliferative diseases with dysplastic features. Leukemia. 22:1308–19. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.119. PMID: 18480833.
crossref
43. Emanuel PD. 1999; Myelodysplasia and myeloproliferative disorders in childhood: an update. Br J Haematol. 105:852–63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1999.01435.x. PMID: 10554793.
crossref
44. Hasle H, Niemeyer CM, Chessells JM, et al. 2003; A pediatric approach to the WHO classification of myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative diseases. Leukemia. 17:277–82. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402765. PMID: 12592323.
crossref
45. Niemeyer CM, Locatelli F. 2006; Chronic myeloproliferative disorders. In: Pui CH. Childhood leukemias. New York, NY:. Cambridge University Press,. 571–98. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511471001.023. PMID: 17140547.
46. Emanuel PD, Bates LJ, Castleberry RP, Gualtieri RJ, Zuckerman KS. 1991; Selective hypersensitivity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 77:925–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V77.5.925.925. PMID: 1704804.
crossref
47. Pinkel D. 1998; Differentiating juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia from infectious disease. Blood. 91:365–7. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V91.1.365. PMID: 9414312.
crossref
48. Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Fragale A, et al. 2003; Somatic mutations in PTPN11 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 4:148–50. DOI: 10.1038/ng1156. PMID: 12717436.
crossref
49. Caye A, Strullu M, Guidez F, et al. 2015; Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia displays mutations in components of the RAS pathway and the PRC2 network. Nat Genet. 47:1334–40. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3420. PMID: 26457648.
crossref
50. Stieglitz E, Taylor-Weiner AN, Chang TY, et al. 2015; The genomic landscape of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 47:1326–33. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3400. PMID: 26457647. PMCID: PMC4626387.
51. Sakaguchi H, Okuno Y, Muramatsu H, et al. 2013; Exome sequencing identifies secondary mutations of SETBP1 and JAK3 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 45:937–41. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2698. PMID: 23832011.
crossref
52. Flotho C, Kratz CP, Bergsträsser E, et al. 2008; Genotype-phenotype correlation in cases of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia with clonal RAS mutations. Blood. 111:966–7. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-111831. PMID: 18182584.
crossref
53. Matsuda K, Shimada A, Yoshida N, et al. 2007; Spontaneous improve-ment of hematologic abnormalities in patients having juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia with specific RAS mutations. Blood. 109:5477–80. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-046649. PMID: 17332249.
crossref
54. Locatelli F, Niemeyer CM. 2015; How I treat juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 125:1083–90. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-08-550483. PMID: 25564399.
crossref
55. Tefferi A. 2016; Primary myelofibrosis: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk- tratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 91:1262–71. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24592. PMID: 27870387.

Fig. 1
Translocation of the break-point cluster region (BCR) gene.
br-57-2-95-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Gene mutations detected in patients with chronic myelomono-cytic leukemia (CMML).
br-57-2-95-f2.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles