PDF
Citation
Print
INTRODUCTION
Secondary bone tumors originate from various organs. Prostate, breast, lung, kidney, and thyroid cancers account for 80% of all skeletal metastases1,10). Hematological malignancies, although the incidence is less than that of solid malignant tumors, also frequently affect the skeletal system. Among these skeletal events, the spine is one of the most commonly involved site. In cases of involving spinal column by hematological malignancies, patients show various clinical manifestations including bone pain syndrome, pathological fractures, recurrent infection, or neurologic compromise15–17). These complications bring patients with hematological malignancy to spine department and spinal lesions usually need a multimodal strategy including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy in addition to the primary medical treatment for the hematological disease. These involvements frequently result in disability and morbidity leading to increased anxiety and socio-economical cost.
Although spinal metastasis from solid tumors has been amply reported in many literatures, little is known about spinal involvements of hematological malignancies. In this study, the authors analyzed patients with hematological malignancies involving the spine at a single institute to assess the epidemiologic data and their clinical courses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2011 to September 2014, 195 patients (98 males, 97 females) suffered from hematological malignancies in a single institute were enrolled in this study. All patients referred to spine department due to spine-related symptoms. Their clinical records and radiological data were reviewed retrospectively. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to evaluate the levels of spinal lesions causing their symptoms in all patients. Presenting symptoms and its causing spinal problems were analyzed using clinical history, imaging findings, and operation-related record in surgical cases. Proper treatment modalities were selected based on the status of the disease by experienced spine surgeons. In surgically treated patients, their clinical results were also analyzed. Numeric rating score (NRS) for pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used for clinical results. Neurologic outcomes were assessed using Frankel grading for the patients who had neurologic compromise. The data were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
RESULTS
Primary hematological malignancies
Ninety-eight male patients and ninety-seven female patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age at the time of referral was 58.9±13.0 years (21–93 years). The mean duration of follow-up after the diagnosis of spinal involvement of hematological malignancy was 23.5±15.6 months (6–50 months). Primary diagnosis of hematological malignancies was multiple myeloma (96 patients, 49.2%), chronic myeloid leukemia (30 patients, 15.4%), acute myeloid leukemia (22 patients, 11.3%), lymphoma (15 patients, 7.7%), myelodysplastic syndrome (10 patients, 5.1%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (4 patients, 2.1%), and others (18 patients, 9.2%) (Fig. 1).
Presenting symptoms and diagnosis of the spinal problems
Presenting symptoms were classified into three types: axial pain, radiating pain, and extremity weakness combined with paresthesia. Mechanical axial pain (131 patients, 67.2%) was the most common symptom, followed by radiating pain (49 patients, 25.1%) and weakness (15 patients, 7.7%) (Fig. 2). Pathologic spinal compression fracture was the leading cause of the axial pain, and the majority of the pathologic fractures were related to multiple myeloma (112 patients). Radiating pain was caused by the underlying degenerative spinal problems (44 patients) and drug-induced neuropathy (5 patients). Diagnosis of drug-induced neuropathy was done by clinical features (non-dermatomal paresthesia) and radiologic findings (no evidence of compressive radiculopathy/myelopathy). Progressive extremity weakness resulted from epidural mass without pathologic fractures in 5 patients (4 with multiple myeloma and 1 with chloroma from acute myeloid leukemia) and pathologic fracture causing cord compression in 10 patients.
Surgical managements and results
Among the patients presenting pathologic fractures without neurologic compromises, 35 patients (26.5%) who were unresponsive to conservative treatment for pain relief were surgically treated by percutaneous bone cement augmentation. The thoracolumbar area was the most involved site of these pathologic fractures (Fig. 3). And this surgical treatment was efficient for early pain management with similar long term clinical results (NRS and ODI) comparing with the conservative managements9). Instability of the fractured segment was evaluated based on the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)8). A score of 7 to 12 denoted indeterminate instability (possibly impending) and 13 to 18 denoted instability. Surgery was recommended for patients with SINS scores ≥7 with clinical features. Reconstructive surgery was performed in 16 patients (6 patients presenting impending cord compression and 10 patients presenting compressive myelopathy) (Fig. 4). There were no surgery-related perioperative complications. In one patient, however, relapse of epidural mass developed at the adjacent level at the early postoperative period. In terms of neurologic outcomes, their neurologic outcomes were favorable in the patients with preoperative grade of Frankel grade D or E. However, the patients with preoperative grade of Frankel grade A or B presented poor neurologic recovery. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of patients undergoing reconstructive surgical treatment.
DISCUSSION
Many patients with malignant tumors develop skeletal invasion, and the spine is the most frequent involved skeletal site1). As many as 70% of cancer patients have spinal metastasis, and up to 10% of those develop symptomatic spinal involvement4). Spinal metastasis usually comes from breast, lung, kidney, prostate, and thyroid. However, hematological malignancies, such as myeloma and lymphoma, also frequently involve the spine and neurologic complications can develop2). Their clinical manifestations are quite different from those of solid cancers. Compared to solid cancers which invade a focal area, hematologic malignancies usually involve skeletal system diffusely due to their hematopoietic and lymphoid origins and is more likely to develop intraspinal and extradural mass. Although metastasis of solid cancers has been amply investigated, little has been reported about spinal involvement of hematological malignancies.
Hematological malignancies accounted for 9.4% of new cancer diagnosis in the United States in 2014 and 3.9% in South Korea in 2010. Leukemia is the most common hematological malignancy followed by lymphoma and myeloma18). Many organs can be affected by hematological malignancies and bone is one of them. Representatively, multiple myeloma frequently involves the skeletal system in up to 90% of myeloma patients, but other hematological cancers can also affect bone2).
Spinal involvement of hematological malignancies has various clinical manifestations. Although exact epidemiological data are scarce, clinicians often encounter various types of symptoms from nonspecific pain to definite neurologic deficits from radiculopathy, myelopathy, and direct nervous involvement of tumor cell in hematological malignancy patients.
Axial pain can originate from various sources including osteolysis, bone marrow infiltration, nervous system involvement, or the combination of the aforementioned mechanisms15). Osteolysis is usually found in multiple myeloma, but has also been reported in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, and chronic myeloid disorders in limited cases5,11,13,14). Osteolysis may result in fractures and skeletal instability. In this study, the most common site of pathologic fractures was the thoracolumbar junction. Because authors had not examined MRI of non-symptomatic patients with hematologic malignancies, it is unclear whether hematologic malignancies have some tropism. Authors thought that pathologic fractures, like benign compression fractures, are likely to occur in the thoracolumbar junction where mechanical stress concentrates. Bone marrow involvement by malignant cells produces pain by the expansion of hematopoietic matrix within the fixed volume causing elevated intraosseous pressure and impairment of blood supply15). Patients with pain from tumor infiltration of spine without neurologic deficit may benefit from steroid treatment, vertebroplasty, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy12).
Radiating pain related to hematological malignancy results from the irritation of nerve root by tumor mass or fracture fragment and peripheral neuropathy due to chemotherapy agents3). Many patients are elderly, so spondylotic neuropathy that is not from hematological origin can occur. In our study, 49 patients presenting radiating pain had various causes including spondylosis in 37 patients, pathologic fractures in 7 patients, epidural mass in 2 patients, and peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients.
Extramedullary epidural mass or fracture fragments may cause neurologic deficits7). In this study, 15 patients presented various degrees of paralysis of Frankel grade A to E. Spinal involvement of myeloma is most commonly treated non-surgically with a combination of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. When patients present with spinal instability or neurologic deficits in the setting of a compressive lesion, surgical intervention is considered7,19,21). The surgical strategies are usually sufficient decompression of neural elements and/or stabilizing the spinal column. Stabilization via anterior or posterior fixation may also provide support for patients with hematological malignancies who are scheduled to undergo nonsurgical treatments to control disease progression. There are various surgical options depending on the degree of instability, compression of neural elements, and overall general health condition of the patient. Surgical management can improve neurologic function and quality of life6,20). We performed reconstructive surgeries in 16 patients. Even though surgical intervention was useful for early paralysis (Frankel grade D or E), neurologic recovery was not satisfactory for the progressed paralysis (Frankel grade A).
Our study has several limitations. First, we enrolled only consulted patients in a single institute, so there is possibility of selection bias. Second, polyneuropathy as a causative factor was overlooked. Various chemotherapy agents produce polyneuropathy-induced pain to hematological malignancy patients. Third, clinical outcomes like visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were not included.
However, this study demonstrated the various causes of the spine related problems in hematological malignancies, and these problems could develop by the disease progression or consequences of treatments. Moreover, neurologically deteriorating conditions could occur in limited cases (7.7%) and timely surgical management may be required for these patients to improve the patients’ quality of life and overall clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Hematological malignancies may lead to various spinal problems ranging from fractures to spinal cord injury. Conservative and palliative treatments are mainstay for these lesions. However, timely surgical interventions should be also considered for rapidly progressive neurologic compromise.
XML Download