The rigid neuroendoscope used for endoscopic disconnection consists of a 30-degree Hopkins pediatric telescope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) with an outside diameter of 2.7 mm, a sheath for the telescope with an outside diameter of 3.8 mm with two working channels, and a stylet. A monopolar-coagulating electrode or an Nd-Yag laser system, a fiberoptic light guide, an Xe light source, and an endovision system are other supporting instruments. An endoscopic procedure is performed under the general endotracheal anesthesia. Because most of the patients have small ventricles, usually a neuronavigation system is set before beginning the main surgical procedure. The AxiEM™ Electromagnetic Navigation system from Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA is usually helpful in avoiding a fixation of head. After conformation of optimal trajectory to the interface between HH and normal tissue under guidance of neuronavigation, Kocher’s point is the most favored site for a burr hole (Fig. 2A). Then the frameless stereotaxy would be used to tap the ‘normal’ right lateral ventricle using a ventricular catheter (Fig. 2D). At the author’s institute, a peel-away technique is usually used for endoscopic surgery. A peel-away catheter is then replaced via the tract. The telescope with the sheath is then advanced into the lateral ventricle through the peel-away catheter with irrigation of isotonic solution. When the telescope has been advanced through the foramen of Monro, the HH protruding from the floor and the lateral wall of the third ventricle is usually seen (Fig. 2E). The confines of the protruding hamartoma and the normal hypothalamus can be easily determined by direct visualization; however, for difficult cases, the depth electrode is inserted prior to endoscopic surgery to guide the depth and the margin of disconnection. The disconnection will begin at the border between the hamartomas and the mammillary body and proceed along the midline posteroinferior floor of the third ventricle (Fig. 2C, E, F). The direction will be posterior to anterior and lateral to inferior midline (Fig. 2A, B). Neuronavigation and the depth electrode will guide the depth of disconnection. The fiberoptic laser or monopolar coagulator is used through the working channel of the sheath. Under direct visualization, the hamartoma can be coagulated by a monopolar electric coagulator or removed by microforceps (Fig. 2A, B, F). When the thin pial membrane or arachnoid membrane is reached, dissection is complete. For difficult or larger/giant HH, dissection carries along the depth electrode until the tip of the electrode is reached. Complete disconnection between the HH and hypothalamus can be confirmed by observing air density along the disconnection site on postoperative brain CT scans or signal changes on MR images7,8).

Valdueza et al. reviewed the literature and summarized a treatment scheme according to topographical classification of HHs37). Their classification was based on either pedunculated or sessile sagittal orientation and the treatments included open surgical removal or medicinal intervention. Furthermore, they did not suggest any treatment strategy for Type 2 sessile HHs. However, it did reveal a very important feature that sessile-type HHs usually cause GSs1,37). Delalande et al. suggested a new classification of HHs according to their coronal relationship to the hypothalamus, and introduced ‘the concept of disconnection surgery for HHs’10,12). Their report concluded that, as hemispherectomy gave way to hemispherotomy because of serious complications, the complete removal of HHs for controlling seizures was not required anymore. As the nearby vicinity of HHs consists of very critical structures, the utmost effort should be paid to reduce collateral damage. Thus, the authors performed an endoscopic disconnection only for the intraventricular type of hamartoma (Type III). Since Choi et al.8) introduced their small series, the disconnection surgery for all types of HHs only by endoscope has been suggested as a primary treatment10). An HH smaller than 20 mm is considered small (Type I, Type II, Type III) while those larger than 20 mm is considered giant (Type III). Then, based on the location of the HH relative to the hypothalamus and third ventricle, additional classifications are midline (Type I), lateral (Type II), or intraventricular (Type III)8). They also performed ‘repeated disconnection’ for giant Type IV HH31). These classifications have been accomplished according to the symptomatology and the feasibility of treatment modalities (Fig. 1).

Since Choi et al. and others introduced the feasibility of endoscopic disconnection as a feasible treatment option for HHs, Rekate et al. have suggested several factors for successful endoscopic disconnection as follows. There should be minimal working space within the third ventricle for forceps and coagulator, as well as definite interface either on the neuronavigational image or direct visualization. The mass should not be under the optic tract. However, most intraventricular HHs are excellent candidates for endoscopic resection or disconnection8,23,27). Seizure outcomes are mostly about 50–60% of initial seizure-free condition with over 90% of seizure control (reduction of more than 50% of seizure)23,27,31). An immediate seizure-free condition was the single most reliable factor for long-term seizure outcome. The rate of resection was not correlated to the seizure-free condition23). Consequently, complete disconnection is considered to be more important than resection. Most small HHs less than 15 mm in diameter can be effectively managed by endoscopic disconnection27,31). Because small HHs are often attached unilaterally, unilateral disconnection will be enough. But even though HHs attach to the bilateral hypothalamus, unilateral disconnection is usually enough. In bilateral attachment and giant HH cases, preoperative electrophysiological evaluation mostly revealed unilateral propagation of epileptiform discharge31,32). Therefore, disconnection of the ‘affected side’ at first attempt is an optimal strategy for achieving a good outcome with fewer complications24,31,32). As the authors describe31), even giant HHs larger than 25 mm can be efficiently disconnected under guidance of a depth electrode and frameless neuronavigation system. After confirmation of the extent of disconnection and seizure outcome, a second disconnection can be performed with fewer complications. Repeat endoscopic disconnection can effectively rescue the recurrence of seizure. The success rate of repeat endoscopic disconnection was reported as 50%24). Patients with most unilateral attachment, intraventricular type, and small HHs less than 1.5 cm have been reported to be very good candidates for frameless stereotactic endoscopy with over 90% good expected seizure outcome7,8,23,27,31). Slit-like lateral ventricle and giant HHs within a 6-mm space of the third ventricle are no longer limitations in endoscopic disconnection31). Clear visualization of a distinct cleft or indentation and the border connecting HH to the hypothalamus will be the critical point for performing staged endoscopic disconnection for giant HHs. Neuronavigational neuroendoscope with a high definition visualization system will never miss the perfect entry point, trajectory, and entry for the small ventricle31). Complete removal of larger or giant HHs is very difficult or nearly impossible with acceptable morbidity. However, disconnection from the brain for controlling intractable epilepsy would be always feasible regardless of HH size.

Transient short-term memory loss, weight gain, thalamic infarction with memory loss, and hemiparesis have been reported as early complications. About 15–25% of immediate short-term memory loss was reported while permanent memory loss was less than 10% (6.8–8.2%)23,27). Three of four patients with postoperative disconnection-like syndrome (mental dullness, verbal anomia, unilateral tactile anomia, and lack of somesthetic transfer) were observed by Choi et al. This syndrome disappeared spontaneously within 10 days8). Acceptable morbidity has made multiple-staged operations possible24,31,38). A proper trajectory directly to HHs and keeping the disconnection margin straight are essential instructions for minimizing complications. An anterior wiping motion of the endoscope could result in critical damage to the fornix, optic apparatus, or hypothalamus. Because unilateral thalamic infarction can result in approximately 30% of patients by the breaching arachnoid or pia mater, staying within the third ventricle without breaching these friable membranes is of utmost importance23). For severely affected patients, relieving intractable epilepsy would outweigh these complications and clinically significant damage to a mammillary body or fornix would not be evident. Because these patients are mostly clinically and socially impaired, pursuing resection or disconnection would be more beneficial for these patients38). The endoscopic disconnection may not always be possible for every HH. However, there are known factors to achieving good outcomes with minimal complications10,12). Careful planning and a stepwise approach with the advanced surgical technique will make it possible24,31).