We collected clinical data of 11 patients who underwent VS surgery between July 2011 and October 2012. The mean age of the patients was 51 years (range, 40-74), and the male-to-female ratio was 3 : 8. The initial symptom of most patients was asymmetric hearing impairment. Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss was evident in seven patients (64%). Other initial symptoms were dizziness, tinnitus, and asymmetric facial paresthesia. The preoperative facial nerve function of all patients was normal. Tumor diameters ranged from 18 to 38 mm. Four patients were Koos grade II, two patients were grade III, and the other five patients were grade IV (Table 1)12).

All patients received preoperative DTT for the facial nerve and underwent operations using the retromastoid approach in the park bench position. All surgically treated patients underwent intraoperative facial nerve integrity monitoring, nerve stimulation, brainstem auditory evoked potential, electromyography and nerve conduction study. Postoperative DTT was performed at postoperative 3 month. Facial nerve function was clinically evaluated according to the House-Brackmann (HB) facial nerve grading system8).

DTI data were acquired using a 6-channel head coil on a 1.5 T Philips Gyroscan Intera (Philips, Ltd., Best, the Netherlands) with single-shot echo-planar imaging. For each of the 32 non-collinear diffusion sensitizing gradients, we acquired 70 contiguous slices parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line. Imaging parameters were as follows : acquisition matrix=96×96, reconstructed to matrix=192×192, field of view=240× 240 mm², repetition time=10398 ms, echo time=72 ms, parallel imaging reduction factor (sensitivity encoding factor)=2, echo planar imaging factor=59 and b=1000 s/mm², number of excitations=1, and a slice thickness of 2.5 mm (acquired isotropic voxel size 2.5×2.5×2.5 mm³). Affine multi-scale two-dimensional registration at the Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Software Library (FSL; www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) was used for removal of eddy current-induced image distortions and motion artifacts24). DTI-Studio software (Center of Magnetic Resonance Microimaging, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA) was used for evaluation of the facial nerve tract9). Fiber tracking was based on the fiber assignment continuous tracking algorithm and a multiple regions of interest (ROIs) approach. For the reconstruction of facial nerve, two ROIs were drawn at the internal auditory meatus (IAM) and facial nerve entry area at the brainstem7,28). Fiber tracking was started at the center of a seed voxel with a fractional anisotropy >0.15 and ended at a voxel with a fractional anisotropy of <0.15 and a tract turning-angle of <70 degrees.

DTT was able to obtain a tract connecting the IAM and brainstem in all 11 cases. Facial nerve course on preoperative tractography were entirely correlated with intraoperative findings in all patients (100%). Facial nerve was located on the anterior of the tumor surface in 5 cases, on anteroinferior in 3 cases, on anterosuperior in 2 cases, and on posteroinferior in 1 case (Table 2).

The mean follow-up period was 20 months, with a range of 12-27 months. In postoperative facial nerve DTT, preservation of facial nerve was confirmed in all patients (Fig. 1). All patients were checked according to HB grade for facial nerve function at immediate postoperative 1 day. One patient was grade I, two patients were grade II, two patients were grade III, five patients were grade IV, and one patient was grade V. Patients with facial palsy were referred for intensive physiotherapy treatment. Facial nerve function at one year after surgery was clinically improved. Two patients recovered to HB grade III, seven patients recovered to HB grade II, and two other patients recovered HB grade I. Gross total resection (GTR) of tumor mass was achieved in 10 of the 11 cases (91%). Postoperative MRI revealed no residual mass in GTR group. In one patient (Case 10), the facial nerve was stretched thin and adhered to the tumor, thereby it was almost indistinguishable from the tumor mass. Therefore, we performed subtotal resection in order to preserve the facial nerve (Table 2).

Facial nerve preservation was evident in 10 of the 11 patients. In another patient (Case 2), the facial nerve was transected during tumor removal. Her facial nerve was very thin and fragile because of severe indentation caused by the tumor mass. We initially tried a primary end-to-end anastomosis, which failed due to the thinness and weakness the facial nerve. Thus, glue-coated collagen fleece (Tachocomb®) was used to connect the facial nerve.

Although evoked potential monitoring and careful visual inspections are performed to identify the compressed facial nerve during surgery, it is also desirable to obtain preoperative information about its course26). The reliable preoperative visualization of the nerve location in relation to the tumor may be valuable additional information for the surgeon. This information would allow the surgeon to plan the tumor removal accordingly and might increase the safety of the surgery4). However, despite the advances in surgical imaging, visualization of the three-dimensional anatomy of the lesion with its surrounding cranial nerves is, at times, difficult. Currently, the best methods of imaging of the CPA and its contents consist of two-dimensional MR imaging, including fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition and CISS methods17,25). Although the relationship of the lesion to its nearby cranial nerve can be visualized, detailed anatomy cannot be ascertained, particularly in cases of very large tumors5). Furthermore, thinned, splayed fibers, particularly of the facial/vestibular bundle, are often difficult to visualize because they course around the tumors. For larger lesions, it is difficult to visualize the facial nerve preoperatively using such conventional MR imaging22). This due in part to the nearly indistinguishable signal intensities of the facial nerve and VS, focal nerve thinning that occurs as a result of the tumor mass effect, and in large tumors, the lack of intervening cerebrospinal fluid between the two structures26).

Recently developed DTT allows the three-dimensional reconstruction of the cranial nerves in healthy individuals7). DTT is a novel modality of MR imaging analysis that measures the diffusion direction of water molecules by combining multiple diffusion-weighted image scans taken from multiple gradient directions. The diffusion of water molecules is thought to be anisotropic inside white matter tracts14,15) and therefore maximal along the direction of the fiber tracts14). A three-dimensional vector field (tensor) is assigned to each voxel. This information is then used to reconstruct and represent pictorially the white matter tracts within a specific ROI.

DTT reconstruction has been considered successful if a continuous tract of fibers is seen to extend from the IAM to the brainstem along the tumor capsule19). Taoka et al.26) applied these DTT techniques to patients with VS, and the authors reported that they were able to identify the location of the facial nerve in a subset of patients. We consider the technique of DTT to be a powerful tool for preoperatively predicting the course of the displaced facial nerve in VS. This information may increase the safety of surgery by enabling preservation of facial nerve function26). The reliable preoperative visualization of the nerve location in relation to the tumor may be valuable additional information for the surgeon. This information would allow the surgeon to plan the tumor removal accordingly and might increase the safety of the surgery4).

Hodaie et al.7) studied the course of cranial nerves using DT imaging-based tractography in 4 healthy patients. The study of the facial/vestibular complex with seeds in the internal auditory meatus primarily showed the cisternal segment of the nerves, and it was not possible to clearly differentiate the facial, vestibular, and cochlear components. Chen et al.3) successfully combined tractography and anatomical imaging to demonstrate the location of the trigeminal and facial nerves in 3 patients with VS and found that the facial nerve position was primarily anterior and inferior. In a study of 8 patients with VS, Taoka et al.26) were able to demonstrate a correspondence between the preoperative DT imaging reconstruction and the intraoperative location of the facial nerve in 5 patients (62.5%). Gerganov et al.4) proved that tractography provides highly reliable data : in 20 (90.9%) of 22 patients, a good correlation between the findings existed. And, recent study28) reported that preoperative identification of facial nerve was possible in 7 (87.5%) of 8 cases. The facial nerve location predicted by preoperative DTT agreed with surgical findings in all 7 cases. In this study, facial nerve courses on preoperative tractography were entirely correlated with intraoperative findings in all patients (100%).