Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the most devastating complications of cancer and is usually associated with poor prognosis2,10). Improvements in the systemic treatment of cancer and survival mean that the control of central nervous system (CNS) involvement has become increasingly important to achieve overall disease control10). BM in breast cancer (BC) differs from BM from other primaries for several reasons. The first concerns the high incidences of BM and relapse in BC, which vary from 25 to 40%3,19). The second is that BM in BC is more radiosensitive than BM from other primaries, such as, melanoma or renal cell carcinoma, and the third reason is that prognosis is better after BM diagnosis4).

For these reasons additional whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after local treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery for BM from BChave been recommended for patients with a good prognosis1,20). But there appears to be a lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment because of known adverse radiation effect. Furthermore, until comparatively recently, the majority of comparative studies conducted on treatment modalities failed to consider primary cancer intrinsic subtype, even after the development of targeted therapy.

Accordingly, treatment outcomes should be re-investigated to determine the roles of treatment modalities and the effects of intrinsic subtype in BM from BC. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patient with BM from BC treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) and assessed the impacts of other treatment methods, clinical and pathological variables on the risks of brain relapse and overall survival.

In 105 patients who treated with GKS as an initial treatment, mean age at the time of GKS was 50.3 and 83 (78.3%) had KPS no less than 70. Mean tumor volume and number were 9.9 cc and 3.78 cc, respectively. Prescribed marginal dose showed 18.48 on average. Median overall survival was 72.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-89.975].

In the study population (n=62), the mean age at the time of GKS for BM was 51.6±1.4 years, and 48 (77.4%) had KPS no less than 70. Mean tumor volume and number were 11.4 cc and 3.05 cc respectively. Prescribed marginal dose showed 17.8 Gy on average. These baseline characteristics did not differ from that of patients (number=105) who underwent GKS as initialtreatment. Other demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Forty-five of the 62 patients had died at the time of review. Median overall survival was 73.0 weeks (95% CI, 46.0-100.1). LC and DC failure occurred in 14 and 23 of the 62 patients, respectively. Overall survival, LC rate and DC rate were not different between GKS alone group from additional WBRT group. Six- and 12-month actuarial DC rates were 80.7% and 77.0% in GKS alone group and 93.7% and 67.5% in additional WBRT group, respectively (p=0.181).

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on breast cancer patients with BM treated at a single-institution from 2002 to 2011. Overall survival in the present study was longer than those reported previously4,11,15), which could be due to a high proportion of younger patients (≤65) and an overall good performance status (KPS≥70). Furthermore, previously identified prognostic factors, such as, treatment modality and volume and number of brain metastases were not found to affect treatment outcomes significantly. Patients' homogeneity who was elegible to GKS might affect to these results. Nevertheless, we also attribute this result to a betterunderstanding of tumor biology, early diagnosis of brain metastases, and the adoption of multimodal treatments, which included targeted drug therapies, surgery, radiosurgery, and radiotherapy.

Le Scodan et al.9) examined outcomes for WBRT in BC patients with BM, and concluded that a low KPS, and tumor intrinsic subtypes were for significant prognostic value. Our results support these findings. However, in the present study, previously reported prognostic factors for brain metastasis, such as, number and volume of brain metastases, age, and additional WBRT were not found to be significantly associated with LC or overall survival. Only a large number of metastases were found to be significantly related to DC rate. These findings suggest that established scoring systems, such as, RPA, GPA, and SIR, cannot accurately predict outcomes of BM from BC14). Because generally well known prognostic factors considered in decision of radiosurgery or radiotherapy do not take into account primary tumor subtype, and thus, many previous studies concerning radiosurgery seems to have been conducted using incomplete prognosis scoring systems6-8,14). Accordingly, the progress made in tumor biology and targeted therapy means that cancer-specific prognostic systems are needed to better characterize patients and devise individualized treatment strategies6).

Aoyama1) recently reviewed treatment outcomes of BM from BC, and concluded that WBRT is still important in this context of modern radiotherapy despite delayed adverse effects on cognition and functional independence2,13). In our study, we found that additional WBRT did not influence LC, DC, or survival. Furthermore, actuarial curves showed that DC and overall survival rates in GKS alone vs. additional WBRT crossed at 37 and 55 weeks. These findings suggest the effect of WBRT on recurrence does not give significant influence in long term survivors. They caution that treatment scheme should be modified to meet the expectations of physicians and patients12,18).

In this study, LC rate was not affected by any prognostic value such as age, KPS, intrinsic subtype or WBRT status. Which may suggest that local recurrence did not affect prognosis after GKS for BM from BC. This result may reflect high LC probability of GKS. And better survival and distant control were found to be driven by the HER2+ subset. Previously, HER2+ overexpression indicates an aggressive subtype of BC characterized by rapid cell proliferation, increased angiogenesis, deficient apoptosis, and increased metastasis formation. Accordingly, HER2+ is considered a negative prognostic factor that affects new and recurrent brain metastases in BC5). However, recent reports which showed treatment outcome regarding to intrinsic subtype suggest that patients with CNS metastases and HER2+ have better survival than patients with CNS metastases and HER210,16,17,20), which may be due to the differences in biological background and treatment improvements related to HER2-targeted therapy10). These results suggest that other unknown genetic factors, rather than HER2+, affect outcome. Our data suggest that elevated observed rates of recurrent BM in HER2+ BC were due to prolonged survival, rather than any causative relation.

Several limitations of the current study warrant consideration. First, this study included patients who were treated with GKS for brain metastases initially and whose tumor intrinsic subtype could be identified. The selection bias may have inflated median survival and deviated the results of analyses. But the main objective of our study was to analyze the effect of biological subtype on treatment outcomes, therefore we had to select the patients who could provide whole parameters of interest. Also, all 106 patients who underwent GKS as initial treatment showed similar baseline characteristics and similar results on univariate analyses results. Therefore, we thought this data might possess representativeness. Second, the effects of secondary treatments after LC and DC failure were not considered and third, the cohort size was small.

In this study, the clinical courses of patients with BM from BC were found to be affected by BC subtype, performance score, and systemic chemotherapy. These results might suggest that therapeutic strategy and prognosis scoring system should be individualized to reflect these factors. Additional data from large-scaled, randomized controlled trials are required to determine the role of additional WBRT and to devise a disease specific prognostic scale for BM from BC.