A 52-year-old woman (Case #2 in Table 1) came to the outpatient clinic complaining of pain radiating down her left arm. Cervical MRI obtained at the outpatient clinic showed herniated nucleus pulposus at the C4-5 level and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament at the C4-5-6 level. Cervical MBB at the left C4-5-6 was performed. Two milliliters of 2% mepivacaine HCL mixed with 8 mg (0.2 mL) of triamcinolone acetonide was injected at each level. After the procedure, the patient was moved to the recovery room. She complained of mild chest discomfort and respiratory difficulty. We checked her blood pressure and oxygen saturation and were reassured by her normal vital signs. A few minutes later, the recovery room nurse called for the CPR team. The patient's blood pressure and pulse were within the normal range, but she had severe respiratory depression. She required intubation and mechanical ventilation. The light reflex was intact, but quadriplegia was observed. Spontaneous respiration returned after thirty minutes of mechanical ventilation, and the quadriplegia improved gradually. After observation for the day, she was discharged without neurologic complications.

A 52-year-old man (Case #9 in Table 1) complained of right occipital headache and dizziness. He worked as a driver. He did not have any significant past medical history and his only regular medication was aspirin. He had tried taking medication for his occipital headache for years, but there was no improvement. A first C2 ganglion block was performed. Prior to the procedure, he underwent brain CT angiography and it was normal. Before the treatment, his blood pressure was 135/88 mm Hg and heart rate was 64 beats/min. To avoid complications of particulate steroids such as embolic infarction, only 1 mL of 2% mepivacaine was injected near the right C2 dorsal root. There was no improvement in symptoms and after 12 days, and an additional procedure was performed. Before the second procedure, his blood pressure was 128/90 mm Hg, heart rate was 65 beats/min and body temperature was 36.7℃. Using real-time fluoroscopy, a right C2 dorsal root ganglion block was performed. While attempting the block, the patient complained of his typical radiating pain to occipital area. Confirming that there was no vascular uptake after contrast media injection, the same drug as before was injected. The patient was stable during the procedure. As soon as we stepped into the recovery room, the patient complained of shortness of breath and right hemiparesis (motor grade II). Oxygen was administered and intravenous access was obtained. His vital signs were stable. Although alert, there was anisocoria in one pupil. Compared to the left, the right pupil was dilated. There were no other cranial nerve deficits. With preparation of intubation set and other emergency drugs, we observed the patient for 130 minutes. His pulse rate decreased to 49 beats/min for a moment, but soon recovered spontaneously. Finally, the symptoms all improved and he left the recovery room without neurologic deficit. However, when he came to the outpatient clinic a week later, he complained of impotence and fecal incontinence. These symptoms resolved spontaneously over two months, but he required some urologic medication.

A 34-year-old woman (Case #1 in Table 1) who was in a traffic accident two months prior to presentation visited the outpatient clinic because of right neck pain. To relieve the neck pain, cervical facet MBB at C3 to C7 was performed with a mixture of 10 mL of 2% mepivacaine and 2 mL of 40 mg triamcinolone. About 30 minutes after the injection, she reported chest discomfort and nausea. After that she rapidly developed quadriparesis, but showed stable respiration and blood pressure. Cervical spinal MRI was performed, but no abnormality was detected except for degenerative desiccation of the C5-6 disc. She required hospitalization in the neurosurgical ward. Three days later, she complained of dysphagia and showed mental obtundation. When we attempted to check the pupil size and light reflex, opening her eyelids was difficult because she was resisting; her eyeballs were deviated upwards, but it seemed like intentional deviation and the light reflexes were prompt. She was non-responsive to noxious stimuli on her face, neck, and upper and lower limbs. Deep tendon reflexes in the upper and lower extremities were symmetric and normoactive. Hoffmann or Babinski signs were not noted. Respiration, blood pressure and heart rate were stable. Brain MRI, including diffusion tensor images, was performed to differentiate organic brain lesions. It did not show any abnormalities. Four hours after mental obtundation, she awoke and was able to communicate with her mother by opening and closing her eyes. The consulting psychiatrist diagnosed her with a conversion disorder. A somatosensory-evoked potential study showed no electrophysiologic evidence of dysfunction. Physical therapy was begun. Two months of rehabilitation has improved her motor and sensory function. She complained of insomnia and abdominal discomfort without any motor or sensory disorder when she was discharged.

A case with temporary neurologic deficits after cervical transforaminal injection of local anesthetics was reported17) in which the patient had transient quadriparesis without respiratory depression for 20 minutes. The authors suggested the cause was inadvertent intra-arterial injection of drug17). There was also a reported case of transient tetraplegia after blockade of the cervical zygapophyseal joints14). Unguided injection 1% lidocaine was performed into the facet joints between the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae. The patient developed weakness in all limbs, dissociated sensory loss and had difficulty breathing. Transient hypotension and bradycardia were also noted, but all symptoms resolved within 30 minutes. The authors discussed the arterial relationship surrounding the cervical zygapophyseal joints and hypothesized that an inadvertent uptake of the local anesthetics into the anterior spinal artery caused the deficit. In our Cases #2 and #3, judging from the type of block and the patients' symptoms, the cause was likely similar.

However, in Case #9, the cause of the deficits does not seem to be limited to arterial uptake. The signs and symptoms were compatible with toxicity of local anesthetics related to venous injection4). This case (#9) showed signs of hemianesthesia and cardiac effects. If these deficitsoccurred due to anterior spinal artery uptake, the neurologic signs would have been symmetric. If we had inadvertently punctured the adjacent vertebral artery, it should have been easily recognizable because of the large size and arterial pressure of the vertebral artery. We suspected that the profuse venous plexus around the C2 ganglion might have played some role in the deficits. We do not use particulate steroids for TFEB or ganglion blocks because it is well-known that particulate steroids can cause embolic aggregation and occlude vessels, leading to permanent neuronal infarction. In general, the greater the vascular supply of the tissue, the greater the absorption.

Radicular arterial and venous anatomy of the cervical spine is variable from person to person, and it is difficult to estimate the location even with real-time fluoroscopy. We cannot completely avoid the inadvertent intravascular uptake of the drugs. Clinicians should be aware that intravascular injection may always occur no matter how carefully the procedures are performed. Even if temporary, cervical block complications can be serious. Therefore, vital signs must be checked before and after the procedure and real-time monitoring is recommended during treatment. When performing these procedures around the cervical roots or ganglia, it would be best not to use steroids because arterial uptake can occur easily in these areas. Physicians must explain this risk to patients and caregivers for fully-informed consent.

Little is known about the relative importance of local anesthetic volume versus concentration for peripheral nerve blockade24,25,31,33) or for spinal pain blocks. The optimum dose of local anesthetics in spinal pain blocks is adjusted to prevent pain, minimize motor block, and prolong block duration. A study of the relative influence of local anesthetic volume and concentration on recovery room pain and motor paralysis in patients undergoing interscalene blocks for shoulder surgery has been reported10). This report suggested that when a large volume of local anesthetics (ropivacaine) was administered, the placement accuracy was less critical and motor block was associated with the local anesthetic concentration. In studies of sciatic nerve blocks, the authors concluded that administering a low volume and a high concentration of local anesthetic was associated with a shorter time to onset of complete sensory and motor block33) and a longer duration of analgesia31) than a larger volume and a lower concentration of local anesthetic. Individual patients may have different responses to the same dose of the same drug delivered in the same location. Needle-to-nerve proximity may also influence pain suppression or motor paralysis10). However, these results cannot be directly translated to spinal pain block procedures.

In our results, the incidence of transient deficits between Groups A and B was definitely different in lumbar pain block cases (p<0.05). The incidence of complications after the lumbar block procedure depended on the concentration of the drug. Motor paralysis was the most common symptom. Motor paralysis developed only in Group A. After the injection of 2% mepivacaine caused a temporary motor paralysis, two patients were switched to 1% mepivacaine for treatment in the same area, and the complications did not occur again. Those patients who experienced motor paralysis tended to show better pain outcomes; nevertheless dense motor paralysis was problematic. Clinicians should bear in mind that the concentration of local anesthetics can influence motor power.

Unlike the different concentration of the drug in Group A and B, the volume per injection site was set equal to 2 mL. A large number of patients had injection procedure in multiple levels. We analyzed to the relationship of total injected volume and incidence of complication but it did not show any meaningful difference.

The term conversion disorder (previously referred to as "hysterical neurosis") refers to functional or unexplained neurological deficits such as paralysis or somatosensory losses that are not explained by organic lesions in the nervous system15,22). It is usually a diagnosis of exclusion after all organic causes have been ruled out18). Hysterical conversion reactions can present as unexplained deafness, blindness, hemi- or paraplegia, seizures, or aphonia9,18,27). Most often, an underlying disorder such as depression or an overwhelming stressor has distorted the patient's coping mechanisms9,19,22,23). Recurrence rates are reported to be as high as 20% to 25%, and most recurrences are within the first year after diagnosis28). The highest recurrence rates and poorest outcomes of treatment tend to be found in individuals who are 30 to 50 years of age and those who have an underlying personality disorder at presentation, poor general health at presentation, and a long duration of symptoms before diagnosis2,7,32). This paralysis is occasionally found after spine surgery such as spinal cord stimulation13), lumbar disc surgery16) or trauma20). Chhibber and Lustik6) reported a patient who presented with leg paralysis after successful spinal anesthesia. Her neurological examination revealed the absence of voluntary movement with hyperesthesia and normal deep tendon reflexes in the affected extremity. The patient was discharged with the diagnosis of conversion disorder and later recovered after outpatient psychiatric treatment. Laraki et al.18) reported a case of bilateral lower extremity paralysis after epidural neurological examination revealed a loss of voluntary movement in the lower extremities with absent proprioception, vibratory sensation, and a patchy sensory loss bilaterally. However, all reflexes, anal tone, and the ability to urinate were intact. Likewise, this patient's symptoms were unexplainable and transient, suggesting a psychological etiology.

Before considering a psychological cause such as conversion disorder, all organic causes should be eliminated. Conversion disorder must be differentiated from malingering and factitious disorders. Unlike factitious and malingering, conversion disorders are manifested unconsciously with no evidence of any external gain.