Journal List > J Korean Neurosurg Soc > v.51(5) > 1161064

Lee, Kim, and Chung: Morphometrical Study of Uncinate Processes and Vertebral Body of Cervical Spine

Abstract

Objective

The anatomical knowledge is the most important and has a direct link with success of operation in cervical spine surgery. The authors measured various cervical parameters in cadaveric dry bones and compared with previous reported results.

Methods

We made 255 dry bones age from 19 to 72 years (mean, 42.3 years) that were obtained from 51 subjects in 100 subjects who donated their bodies. All measurements from C3-C7 levels were made using digital vernier calipers, standard goniometer, and self-made fix tool for two different cervical axes (canal and disc setting). We classified into 4 groups (uncinate process, vertebral body, lamina, and pedicle) and measured independently by two neurosurgeons for 28 parameters.

Results

We analyzed 23970 measurements by mean value and standard deviations. In comparing with previous literatures, there are some different results. The mean values for uncinate process (UP) width ranged from 5.5 mm at C4 and 5 to 6.3 mm at C3 and C7 in men. Also, in women, the mean values for UP width ranged from 5.5 mm at C5 to 6.3 mm at C7. C7 was widest and C5 was most narrow than other levels. The antero-posterior length of UP tended to increase gradually from C3 to C6. The tip way, tip distance, and base distance of UP also showed increasing pattern from C3 to C7.

Conclusion

These measurements can provide the spinal surgeons with a starting point to address bony architectures surrounding targeted soft tissues for safeguard against unintended damages during cervical operation.

INTRODUCTION

The definition of uncinate process (UP) is the bony protuberances that extends cranially from postero-lateral margins of superior end plates in lower cervical spine (C3-C7). In 1858, Luschka named as "eminentia costaria" due to resembled head of rudimentary rib, and Trolard named as "processus uncinatus" in 1893 and its function is to protect brachial plexus and to allow rotational movement12). So far, anatomic studies for cervical UP were demonstrated by several investigators6,9,11), the biomechanical role of cervical UP is both guiding mechanism during flexion and extension and a limiting mechanism during posterior translation and lateral bending18).
Recently, anterior cervical microforaminotomy has been regarded as one of surgical methods, and UP is frequently removed during surgery. Therefore, the anatomical knowledge is 247the most important and has a direct link with success of operation in cervical spine surgery. For prevention of nerve roots and vertebral artery (VA) injuries, the surgeons must keep in mind of normal range and understand of the relationships between the neurovascular structures and bony surroundings. Authors measured various cervical parameters, especially for UP, in cadaveric dry bones and compared with previous reported results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

A total of 100 individuals who donated their bodies to the Department of Anatomy were selected for appropriate study subjects. In 100 subjects, there are no information for age in 32 and severe cervical injuries in 11. So, we tried to make dry bones from 57 subjects. Fifty-seven subjects died with the cause of tumor, cerebral stroke, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and etc. After making dry bone, we found that 6 subjects were exclusive status (cervical operation, severe degenerative change, vertebral body injuries, invasion of tumor, and loss of cervical level). Finally, 255 dry bones (32 male and 19 female) were obtained from 51 subjects.
Total of 51 subjects between the ages of 19 and 72 years (mean, 42.3 years) were categorized according to age and sex. We performed the measurements on 255 cervical dry vertebrae from the C3-C7 levels.

Instruments of measurement

All measurements were made using digital vernier calipers which has accuracy to 0.01 mm and standard goniometer. We used self-made fix tool for cervical vertebrae measurements (Fig. 1). Cervical vertebra has two different axes. One is canal setting and the other is disc setting. Canal setting is the state when imaginary longitudinal line made by posterior side of vertebral body (VB) is perpendicular to the ground (Fig. 1D). Disc setting is the state when imaginary horizontal line made by superior side of VB (endplate) is parallel to the ground. Fix tool was able to support two kinds of axis (Fig. 1E).

Parameters

We measured and classified into 4 groups which are UP, VB, lamina, and pedicle. The parameters of measurements from C3 to C7 were precisely performed. All measurements were checked independently by two neurosurgeons, and mean values were calculated. Total of 28 parameters (27 linear and 1 angular) for 255 vertebrae were used (Table 1) (Fig. 2). There were 19 paired and 9 unpaired parameters.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of total 23970 measurements (results from two neurosurgeons) was performed by mean value and standard deviations. The final table was made by the average of bilateral structures (right and left). The authors compared the data with the results in previous literatures.

RESULTS

A total of 255 vertebrae obtained from 51 cervical spines were studied between the C3 and C7 levels. All symmetrical structures were measured bilaterally. The results of measurement for cervical parameters are shown in Table 2 with the mean value and the standard deviation for linear and angular parameters.
The mean values for UP width ranged from 5.5 mm at C4 and 5 to 6.3 mm at C3 and C7 in men. Also, in women, the mean values for UP width ranged from 5.5 mm at C5 to 6.3 mm at C7. C7 was widest and C5 was narrower than other levels. The AP length of UP ranged 13.1 mm at C3, 13.3 mm at C4 and C5, 13.7 mm at C6, and 13.0 mm at C7 in men. In women, it ranged 11.0 mm at C3 and 12.2 mm at C6. Thus, they tended to increase gradually from C3 to C6. The tip way, tip distance, and base distance of UP also showed increasing pattern from C3 to C7. The UP height ranged from 5.9 mm at C3 to 5.1 mm at C7 in men and from 6.0 mm at C5 to 4.2 mm at C7 in women. There was no increasing pattern in height and C5 was highest than other levels. Not unexpectedly, the inclination tended to decrease gradually from C3 to C7.
There were no increasing patterns in lamina parameters. C5 lamina was longest in length, narrowest in width, and lowest in height than other levels. The width and lower length of pedicle showed increasing pattern from C3 to C7. But upper pedicle length had a similar value in 5 cervical vertebrae. The pedicle-disc height (PDH) were within 1 mm at C3 in canal setting (0.1-0.7 mm) and at C4-C7 in disc setting (0.0-0.9 mm). The distance of UP tip and transverse foramen (TF) was narrowest at C4, C5 and C6.
The parameters of VB showed gradual increasing pattern in width, length, and posterior height. But in anterior height, C5 was lowest than other levels.

DISCUSSION

According to our study result, the mean values for UP width ranged from 5.5 mm at C4 and 5 to 6.3 mm at C3 and C7. In 1996, Ebraheim et al.3) reported that C5 is widest level, and this may be originated from the clinical occurrence of cervical spondylosis due to excessive cervical segmental motion3,8). In our subject, C7 was widest and C5 was narrower than other levels. The AP length of UP tended to increase gradually from C3 to C6. And the tip way, tip distance, and base distance of UP also showed increasing pattern from C3 to C7. These patterns were similar with previous studies2,3). However, the UP height showed no increasing pattern in height, and C5 was highest than other levels. Ebraheim et al. reported that C6 was highest level in UP height1) and Yilmazlar et al.20) reported that C7 was highest level. We thought that it might have caused from different measuring method (disc or canal setting), ethnic character, and etc.
The PDH was within 1 mm at C3 in canal setting (0.1-0.7 mm) and at C4-C7 in disc setting (0.0-0.9 mm). So, antero-superior point of VB and superior pedicle surface can be considered as nearly same height. The distance of UP tip and TF was narrowest at C4, C5 and C6 (1.4 and 1.7 mm). Ebraheim et al.2) reported that the UP tip-TF distance showed decreasing pattern from C3 to C4 (1.2 and 1.6 mm) and increasing from C4 to C7. In that study, they used calculation formula instead of direct measuring as following; (TF medial border distance-interuncinate distance)/2. Pait et al.10) reported that the distance from the tip of UP to VA averaged 0.8 mm at C2-C3 and 1.6 mm at C4-C5 in cadaver. In view of the results so far achieved, when UP is recognized, we must remember that the VA is within about 1-2 mm from the lateral border of UP. In a review of 10 cases of VA injury, Smith et al.15) found that the use of a high-powered drill was the most frequent cause of VA injury.
There are some literatures about measurement for cervical UP and VB using dry bone (Table 3). We selected 3 literatures used dry bone, and compared with our results (Table 4). We averaged all the values from C3 to C7, and compared with those of previous reports. Eight parameters are comparable among 28 parameters, and 3 parameters showed a difference above the standard deviation. The UP tip distance, the UP-TF distance, and the VB width were slightly wide in our result. Other parameters showed similar figures and within the standard deviation.
The authors started this study because there were only few data of oriental cadaveric measurements for cervical vertebra, although increasing of cervical operation. We introduced the concept of disc and canal setting. This is important that without these setting, the more parameters are measured, the more the error is increased. We had interest in the PDH values, because anterior cervical disc height and upper pedicle height are nearly same level, unlikely lumbar and thoracic vertebra. We would like to emphasis that various parameters and methods for cervical measuring, along with results of measurement.
These measurements can provide the spinal surgeons with a starting point to address bony architectures surrounding targeted soft tissues. The spinal surgeon must have a complete understanding of the hidden vascular and bony anatomy and knowledge of the changes during discectomy in anterior cervical spine surgery. Although avoiding unfortunate injury is not always possible, being well-informed with the location and relations among the anatomic features is the only safeguard against unintended damages during cervical operation.

CONCLUSION

The authors measured various cervical parameters with dry bones from donated subjects, and reported the result. There were some different results with previous literatures. These measurements could help spinal surgeon to success in cervical operation.

References

1. Clausen JD, Goel VK, Traynelis VC, Scifert J. Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine : quantification using a finite element model of the C5-C6 segment. J Orthop Res. 1997; 15:342–347. PMID: 9246079.
crossref
2. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Biyani A, Brown JA, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations for uncovertebral involvement in cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; 200–206.
crossref
3. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Brown JA, Biyani A, Yeasting RA. Vulnerability of vertebral artery in anterolateral decompression for cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 146–151. PMID: 8542690.
crossref
4. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Bhatti RA, Yeasting RA. The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol. 1999; 51:363–367. PMID: 10199287.
crossref
5. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Lin D, Haman S, Yeasting RA. Quantitative anatomy of the transverse foramen and pedicle of the axis. J Spinal Disord. 1998; 11:521–525. PMID: 9884298.
crossref
6. Frykholm R. Lower cervical vertebrae and intervertebral discs; surgical anatomy and pathology. Acta Chir Scand. 1951; 101:345–359. PMID: 14868335.
7. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Yang H, Skie M, Yeasting RA. Cervical uncinate process : an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998; 20:249–252. PMID: 9787390.
crossref
8. Marchiori DM, Henderson CN. A cross-sectional study correlating cervical radiographic degenerative findings to pain and disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21:2747–2751. PMID: 8979320.
crossref
9. Milne N. The role of zygapophysial joint orientation and uncinate processes in controlling motion in the cervical spine. J Anat. 1991; 178:189–201. PMID: 1810926.
10. Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI. Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine : the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:769–776. PMID: 8880772.
crossref
11. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K. Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16:861–869. PMID: 1948369.
crossref
12. Payne EE, Spillane JD. The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1957; 80:571–596. PMID: 13499761.
crossref
13. Saringer W, Nöbauer I, Reddy M, Tschabitscher M, Horaczek A. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (uncoforaminotomy) for unilateral radiculopathy : clinical results of a new technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144:685–694. PMID: 12181702.
14. Saringer WF, Reddy B, Nöbauer-Huhmann I, Regatschnig R, Reddy M, Tschabitscher M, et al. Endoscopic anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy : anatomical morphometric analysis and preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:171–180. PMID: 12650402.
crossref
15. Smith MD, Emery SE, Dudley A, Murray KJ, Leventhal M. Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75:410–415. PMID: 8496209.
crossref
16. Taşçioğlu AO, Attar A, Taşçioğlu B. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (uncinatectomy) for cervical disc herniation. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 2001; 94:121–125. PMID: 11147846.
17. Uğur HC, Uz A, Attar A, Tekdemir I, Egemen N, Elhan A. Anatomical projection of the cervical uncinate process in ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93:248–251. PMID: 11012055.
crossref
18. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 1990. ed 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott;p. 722.
19. Yilmazlar S, Ikiz I, Kocaeli H, Tekdemir I, Adim SB. Details of fibroligamentous structures in the cervical unco-vertebral region : an obscure corner. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003; 25:50–53. PMID: 12819950.
crossref
20. Yilmazlar S, Kocaeli H, Uz A, Tekdemir I. Clinical importance of ligamentous and osseous structures in the cervical uncovertebral foraminal region. Clin Anat. 2003; 16:404–410. PMID: 12903062.
crossref
Fig. 1
The self-made fix tools which authors made and used. Anterior (A), lateral (B), and oblique (C) aspect applied with vernier calipers. Schematic sagittal figures of two different axes for cervical vertebra. Canal setting (D) is the state when imaginary longitudinal line made by posterior side of vertebral body is perpendicular to the ground. Disc setting (E) is the state when imaginary horizontal line made by superior side of vertebral body (endplate) is parallel to the ground.
jkns-51-247-g001
Fig. 2
Schematic figures of parameters of cervical vertebra. Superior (A), enlarged figure of anterior with imaginary line of vertebral artery (B), anterior (C), and sagittal cross section of lateral aspect (D). Illustration (A) from The Textbook of Spine, Korea, 2004, p.37, with permission.
jkns-51-247-g002
Table 1
Anatomical parameters of cervical vertebra
jkns-51-247-i001

UP : uncinate process, AP : antero-posterior, VB : vertebral body, CP : costal process, TF : transverse foramen, PDH : pedicle-disc height, canal setting : the state when imaginary longitudinal line made by posterior side of vertebral body is perpendicular to the ground (Fig. 1D), disc setting : the state when imaginary horizontal line made by superior side of vertebral body (endplate) is parallel to the ground (Fig. 1E)

Table 2
Anatomical parameters of cervical vertebra
jkns-51-247-i002

All parameters are the mean of right and left in millimeters. They are presented as mean±standard deviation. M : male, F : female, UP : uncinate process, CP : costal process, PDH : pedicle-disc height, TF : transverse foramen, canal setting : the state when imaginary longitudinal line made by posterior side of vertebral body is perpendicular to the ground (Fig. 1D), disc setting : the state when imaginary horizontal line made by superior side of vertebral body (endplate) is parallel to the ground (Fig. 1E)

Table 3
The published studies of uncinate process and cervical vertebrae
jkns-51-247-i003
Table 4
Mean values and standard deviation of parameters of cervical vertebra
jkns-51-247-i004

All parameters are in millimeters. All measurements are presented as mean±standard deviation. M : male, F : female, T : total, UP : uncinate process, CP : costal process, PDH : pedicle-disc height, TF : transverse foramen, canal setting : the state when imaginary longitudinal line made by posterior side of vertebral body is perpendicular to the ground (Fig. 1D), disc setting : the state when imaginary horizontal line made by superior side of vertebral body (endplate) is parallel to the ground (Fig. 1E)

TOOLS
Similar articles